According to Newsday, the major newspaper on Long Island, about half of eligible students opted out of state math tests. This shows the resilience of the opt out movement and confounds the ability of the state to rank schools by test scores. The statewide number are likely to be about 20%, as in other years.
“Nearly 80,000 public school students in 100 districts across Long Island refused Tuesday to take the state mathematics exam given in grades three through eight, in a fifth straight year of boycotts driven by opposition to the Common Core tests, according to a Newsday survey.
“On the first full-fledged day of math testing in Nassau and Suffolk counties, 79,780 students in the districts that responded opted out — 53.1 percent of the pupils eligible in those systems to take the exam. There are 124 districts on the Island.
“The state’s Common Core math exams began Tuesday morning for most students in grades three through eight. The math test, like the English Language Arts exam administered in the same grade levels in late March, is given in segments during three days and will finish for most students on Thursday.
“Educators and leaders of the opt-out movement on the Island had said they expected refusals to remain high on the Island, a hotbed of anti-test activism. Nearly 85 percent of eligible students in the Middle Country district boycotted the test Tuesday.
“Until state assessments are cleanly and clearly uncoupled from teacher evaluations and are used solely to inform instruction, opt-outs will continue to be a reality,” Middle Country Superintendent Roberta Gerold said. “Parents have to believe that activities in which their children are involved are free of politics and have instructional value and no one can honestly say that is true about the current grades three-through-eight assessment.”
“This is the fifth consecutive year of boycotts of the Common Core tests. On Long Island, the number of refusals mushroomed to about half of all eligible students both last year and in 2015, according to Newsday surveys of the 124 districts in Nassau and Suffolk counties at the time.
“On Tuesday, figures from the 100 responding districts showed 32,239 students in Nassau and 47,541 in Suffolk opted out of the exams. Newsday’s survey showed a broad range: In the Plainedge district, for example, 79 percent of students refused to take the test, while in Hempstead, less than 7 percent opted out.
“More than half of the 100 districts that responded reported that more than 50 percent of their eligible students were sitting out the exam.
“Those opposed to the exams object to the Education Department’s reforms, saying that children are being over-tested and the tests are not developmentally appropriate to children’s ages.
“The state agency has made some changes. Last year, the department shortened the exams, established a statewide moratorium until 2019-20 on using test scores in teachers’ job ratings, and included teachers in devising test questions.
“The ELA exam, given the final week in March, was boycotted by more than 97,000 students on the Island — more than half of those eligible — according to results of a Newsday survey to which 116 of the 124 school systems responded.
“There is a significant difference in the number of students who take the math exam compared with the ELA, because some middle school students in accelerated math classes may not sit for it.
“Districts can waive the state math test for seventh- and eighth-graders who will take the Regents exam in algebra and for those who will take the Regents exam in geometry. In Newsday’s survey Tuesday, tallies of eligible students in three districts included students slated to sit for the Regents exam.
“This year, several systems on Long Island are offering computer-based testing, a new program implemented by the Education Department. Those exams also are given during three days.
“The Franklin Square district on Monday had third-graders in one of its three elementary schools taking the electronic test. Eighteen of 78 eligible third-graders there — 23 percent — opted out, the district said.
“In the South Huntington school district, more than 47 percent of eligible students opted out of the math test on Tuesday. School officials there said they encouraged parents to make their own choice.
“Our position on the opt-out or opt-in movement is that we respect each family’s right to make their own decision regarding testing and have worked hard to keep this polarizing issue from diverting focus away from the important instructional work taking place in our classrooms,” Superintendent David Bennardo said.
“Last year, nearly 88,000 students in 106 districts that responded to Newsday’s survey opted out of the math exam — nearly 53 percent of eligible students in the responding districts.
“In 2015, 66,000 students in 99 districts that responded to Newsday’s survey boycotted the math tests — 46.5 percent of eligible students in the responding districts.”

Hooray! Good for the students. They are not sheep being led to the slaughter house. I like sheep.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If we teach children that they cannot be defined by test scores, we may be giving them the most essential tool needed for surviving the 21st Century’s corporate widget plan.
LikeLike
THANK YOU NEW YORK!
LikeLike
“Poor poor Eliah”
Poor poor Eliah
Years of pushing test
Poor poor Eliah
Eighty percent, at best
Poor poor Eliah
Effort’s all for naught
Poor poor Eliah
Opt outs can’t be fought
Poor poor Eliah
Failed to make the grade
Rich rich Eliah
A million dollars paid
LikeLike
Wow, this is nuts! Good!
LikeLike
Thanks for the update, Diane! Shared on FB for my teacher and parent friends.
LikeLike
“have worked hard to keep this polarizing issue from diverting focus away from the important instructional work taking place in our classrooms,”
Beautiful example of adminimal speak. Should be kept for posterity in the Smithsonian.
Well of course the supe has worked hard to “keep this polarizing issue from. . .” Can’t have them pesky questions about the inanity and insanity that is standardized testing actually be a part of the teaching and learning process. I’d bet he hasn’t done anything to prevent the standardized tests from taking “away from the important instructional work taking place in our classrooms”. Has he told his staff to send the unopened boxes of tests back to the Dept of Ed? Has he instructed the staff to not give the computer version? Of course not, can’t do that, he might lose his very well-paying job and the salary that is quite higher than any of the non-adminimal staff’s job. Can’t have that now can we?
Ahhh, the annual springtime sounds of adminimal bloviations during testing season. Too bad it’s not open season for adminimals.
To put a more serious spin on this very depressing situation:
“Should we therefore forgo our self-interest? Of course not. But it [self-interest] must be subordinate to justice, not the other way around. . . . To take advantage of a child’s naivete. . . in order to extract from them something [test scores, personal information] that is contrary to their interests, or intentions, without their knowledge [or consent of parents] or through coercion [state mandated testing], is always and everywhere unjust even if in some places and under certain circumstances it is not illegal. . . . Justice is superior to and more valuable than well-being or efficiency; it cannot be sacrificed to them, not even for the happiness of the greatest number [quoting Rawls]. To what could justice legitimately be sacrificed, since without justice there would be no legitimacy or illegitimacy? And in the name of what, since without justice even humanity, happiness and love could have no absolute value?. . . Without justice, values would be nothing more than (self) interests or motives; they would cease to be values or would become values without worth.”—Comte-Sponville [my additions]
LikeLike
I have a question.
So, how do the schools pay for these tests? Is it a lump sum? Or per pupil? And who is reviewing the contracts? Are there triple damages if some artificial percentage isn’t met?
This is the kind of information that will motivate people WITHOUT kids in the system to rethink spending our tax dollars on these tests.
LikeLike
Excellent question.
And could have many corollary questions such as “What consequence was there to the testing company for last year’s printing error resulting in a page being omitted from 3-5 ELA test booklets?” Whomever paid for the testing did not receive the product they paid for. Is anyone asking that question?
“Why were there questions on this year’s math test that tested things that are no longer in the revised state standards?”
“How can the tests be considered reliable measures of anything when students received very different versions of a test with different standards being tested depending on the test they received?” (more on these at another time if anyone’s interested…)
“Why must teachers and students use instructional time to do field testing to provide free data to private corporations so they can “improve” a product they then sell back to the schools? Are teachers and students compensated in any way for this coerced compliance with a profit-making company’s R and D?”
And so many others…
LikeLike
The testing in New York is out of control. In April, May, and June we have:
3-8th Grade ELA
3-8th Grade Math
**MOSL’s for all non-tested subjects
Regents Exams
Final Exams
8th Grade Science
NYSESLAT – 4 days (English Language Learners)
LOTE Exams
Field testing
AP Exams
**MOSL’s are exams designed by NYC for the sole purpose of evaluating teachers. These count for 50% of evaluations. MOSL exams are given to every student in a “non-tested” subject. This also includes 3-8 ELA and Math because the state put a phony “moratorium” on the use of the state ELA and Math for teacher evaluation. Now the students who take the state ELA and Math also have to take a MOSL ELA and Math so their teachers can be evaluated. They also take MOSL’s in science, social studies, etc. solely for the purpose of teacher evaluation. We are also required to fulfill any testing accommodations the student may have. This means we are in full test mode for three months. All rooms in use, schedules changed, walls covered.
Parents should know that they can also opt out of the MOSLs. Write your school and opt out. It is the only way to protect your children.
LikeLike
Has anyone else read this?
LikeLike