Recently, Betsy DeVos visited the public schools of Van Wert, Ohio, with Randi Weingarten. Randi picked the district to show DeVos public schools that are the heart of their rural community, which is in Trump country. DeVos talked school choice, but encountered the reality of a community with high poverty and no interest in vouchers or charters.
In this article, Indianan Jill Long THOMPSON explains why vouchers would be a disaster for rural schools.
Jill Long Thompson is a former member of Congress and former USDA Under Secretary for Rural Development. She was board chair and CEO of the Farm Credit Administration and is now an associate professor at the Kelley School of Business and the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University. She lives on a farm in northern Indiana.
Jill Long Thompson is a former member of Congress from Indiana. She is also a former USDA Undersecretary for Rural Development. She is a visiting associate professor at the Kelley School of Business and the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University Bloomington.
Public schools are a cornerstone of communities, and they are a very important component of the rural infrastructure….
For rural communities, in particular, voucher programs create a business model that simply will not work. Running a rural school is very challenging because the resources are always limited, and oftentimes scarce.
Vouchers encourage the creation of small private schools. But, we don’t need more schools in rural communities; we need more resources to strengthen the schools we have. Increasing the number of schools means increasing the overhead, which is why vouchers dilute resources even further.
A school voucher program is the education policy equivalent of a county highway program that would give residents money to build little private roads anywhere they want.
That would not only be costly and inefficient; it would not serve the community’s transportation needs.
One must look no further than our own state, with its aggressive voucher program, to see the problems it causes for small rural school systems.
Since 2011, Indiana has shifted $520 million into the state voucher program.
Unfortunately, many of the schools receiving the vouchers have not performed as well as the public schools that lost funding because of the vouchers.
A voucher program is not the solution to the challenges facing public education.
According to the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania, “Studies of the federally funded (Washington, D.C.) voucher program found that there was no conclusive evidence that vouchers affected student achievement. In fact, children who were given the school voucher performed no better in math and reading than the children who weren’t given vouchers.”
Additionally, “Similar studies of the longest-running school voucher program in the country in Milwaukee actually found that public school students outperformed voucher students at every grade level on the statewide reading and math tests.”
My husband and I are products of rural public schools. We live on a farm in the same district where my husband completed his elementary and high school education, and where he and his father both served on the local school board.
I know firsthand what the public school means to a rural community. Our school is not just a place to educate our children, but also a vehicle for bringing people together. Our local school is a big part of our identity.
I can think of nothing more important to the rural infrastructure than schools. President Trump’s voucher policies would cause irreparable harm to communities across rural America.

The voucher movement is similar to the spread of anti-union, poverty wage paying WalMart. Both harm rural communities across America.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
I disagree with the highway analogy. It is a false analogy. Providing BEOG’s to college students, enabling them to select the college of their choice, and apply the grant, has not resulted in students setting up their own colleges. Students use the grant, to pay expenses at the college of their choice.
Similarly, parents who receive a school voucher, apply the voucher at the school of their choice. Granted, rural areas will not have as many school choices available, as urban areas.
But to declare that school choice/vouchers will “destroy” rural public schools, is a “chicken little” mentality.
LikeLike
Charles,
Do you live in a rural area? The writer of the article does.
But then, I forget that you have lived everywhere and experienced everything and know everything.
LikeLike
Diane, you know that I live in Metro WashDC (Fairfax County VA). I have lived in rural areas, both here in the USA and abroad.
LikeLike
Of course, Charles. But the fact that you have lived in so many places indicates that you are not deeply rooted in any rural area, as the author of this piece is. You love disruption but most people don’t. Especially where their children are concerned.
LikeLike
I have lived in many places. From Harrison, Maine to Monterey, California, and 16 years in foreign locales. From Oberweis, Germany to Paris, France. This has given me a perspective, that most people do not share, I grant you.
It is not that I love disruption. It is just that dynamism and change are part of our lives. The Greek philosopher Heraclitus said “We live in a world in which the only constant is change”. And I would add that the rate of change is accelerating.
LikeLike
Charles,
Believe it or not, there are people who don’t move from place to place. They don’t want to disrupt their lives. They want disrupters to butt out of their lives.
LikeLike
Charles,
For those of us self-diagnosed with AIIDS* please tell us what BEOG stands for.
*Acronym Identification Impairment Disorder Syndrome (soon to be in the new DSMVI)
LikeLike
Basic Educational Opportunity Grants– college scholarships for the needy
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Diane!
LikeLike
Of course, not everyone joins the military, or the diplomatic service. There is a lot to be said for stability.
LikeLike
Basic Educational Opportunity Grants, also known as “Pell Grants”. These are vouchers, that students redeem at public/private/parochial colleges, to pay tuition (and other costs). No one objects to using tax dollars to pay tuition at the university level.
LikeLike
College scholarships like BEOGs have no impact on communities. Vouchers and charters do. Your analogy is false.
LikeLike
I dispute that. I went to college on a combination of BEOGs, student loans, and the GI Bill. (My wife also contributed!). At my college, I would guess that nearly half of the students were attending, using some type of financial aid. My college would not function without the rivers of financial aid flowing to it.
Western Kentucky University is the largest industry in Bowling Green KY. By far, it has the largest employment. Students choose to attend there, and it pumps millions of dollars into the economy.
LikeLike
“And I would add that the rate of change is accelerating.”
Can’t agree with that at all. Please show me a credible source that makes and verifies that statement.
LikeLike
You can read a capsule description of Heraclitus at
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Heraclitus
I added the comment about the rate of change accelerating. This is only an observation on my part. You are free to accept it or reject it as you wish.
In my time upon this earth, I have seen many things. I have lived all over the world. The changes I have witnessed, have been phenomenal. The first computer I saw, filled an auditorium.
If you choose to believe, that everything in this world is stable, and that the rate of change is constant, then fine.
LikeLike
Some things are indeed constant.
Family. Love for friends and one’s children. Kindness. Decency. Wisdom. Folly. Stupidity. Hubris.
We can appreciate Greek drama because human nature is constant.
We appreciate the Old and New Testament because what matters most does not change.
We appreciate Shakespeare because this man who wrote 500 years ago still speaks to us.
Constant.
LikeLike
Didn’t say that I believed what you state in the last paragraph, please don’t put words into my mouth, it’s unbecoming of you-ha ha!
I haven’t lived all over the world but I ain’t no country bumpkin either even though I live in and love the countryside and nature. (and even if I was it wouldn’t mean squat one way or the other because those provincial folk in the world have a lot of knowledge that many supposedly highly educated folk don’t have).
I figured out the other week (and don’t know how this eluded me for so many years) that I turned 17 in Mexico, studying at the ITESM. And then I turned 18 while living in Peru the next year. Soy bilingüe. I have seen a few things myself over the years having driven across this country around a dozen times. My oldest son was born in Bay State. So we all have our own stories of life.
And I don’t see hardly any change in the basic human condition. We all eat, drink, defecate, urinate, sleep and feel emotions depending upon the situation-loving, hating, liking, doubting etc. . . .
That technology has changed cannot be denied. Whether or not the rate of change is “accelerating”, whatever that may entail, is clearly debatable, much like whether the rate of expansion in the universe is accelerating or not.
As far as Heraclitus, his observation still holds but it says nothing about any rate of change. It’s the saying that one never stands in the same river twice, even if one doesn’t move.
LikeLike
I suppose it depends on what kind of change you’re talking about, but it does seem to be the case with technology, which is arguably the single biggest driver of all other kinds of change on earth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near
LikeLike
“Once the Singularity has been reached, Kurzweil says that machine intelligence will be infinitely more powerful than all human intelligence combined. Afterwards he predicts intelligence will radiate outward from the planet until it saturates the universe.”
Yep, (eyes rolling while guffawing)
The capacity of the human mind for fantasy and fantastical thinking must surely be approaching a singularity of its own. To bad I’ll be dead by the time it happens.
But wait, maybe it will reach my very essences as found in my scattered asses, oops mean ashes, and reconstitute me back to my original form. Yee ha, ha ha ha aha ha ha ha!!
LikeLike
Yes, Kurzweil really does follow it to its logical conclusions. Some of the most extreme logical conclusion strain credulity. But I find the general thrust of the argument quite compelling. In my view, the biggest constraint on “accelerating returns” is the availability of natural resources, more specifically, cheap energy. So, on the other side of the Singularity argument is the Peak Oil argument, which unfortunately is also very compelling.
LikeLike
What technology relies upon most, that which technology can never on it’s own acquire are rare earth metals. I understand the Kurzweil would probably respond that that exactly is the point that technology will get to. I can’t agree and find the concept total nonsense from a rationo-logical scientific point of view. Not that it doesn’t make for good science fiction.
LikeLike
Charles: Many of us who live in rural area live there because we grew up in a rural area and feel an obligation to give back to the community that gave to us. This is why we love our schools, our fire departments, and the other institutions that are a part of our lives. Top down reform has resulted in a worse outcome
LikeLike
I can respect that. If you cherish your institutions, and wish to give back, I can respect that too. I cherish Freemasonry, I have donated many hours to the fraternity.
If you are disenchanted with “top down reform”, as you call it, again, I respect that.
You should support “bottom up reform”. Giving parents, rural and urban control over their children’s education, in the form of vouchers (and savings accounts,etc), is the ultimate control.
LikeLike
Sorry, I was interrupted.
Rural schools have been negatively impacted by top down reform for all my career. That vouchers should suddenly solve all the problems we have is a premise that is silly on the face of it. That vouchers would send children to a multitude of new schools and thus ruin the rural areas may not be true either, but why waste the effort when we know the effort is misdirected?
LikeLike
No one is suggesting that school choice/vouchers are some kind of “magic bullet”, that will take education to the “promised land”. If a voucher plan was initiated here in Fairfax county, the office would get very little business, because the public schools here are awesome.
No one is suggesting that a plethora of new schools would spring up overnight in every village and hamlet. That is absurd, as well.
LikeLike
Your analogy to BEOG’s for college is not remotely applicable. Students applying for college are 18 & older, prepared to travel to & live independently at/ near any of thousands of natl colleges afforded by their chit plus fam/pers svgs + PT work earnings while studying.
I grew up in rural upstate-NY, where the total # of kids w/n reasonable busing/ walking distance for 1st-6th grades was enough to fill a 1-rm schoolhouse (1 teacher) for 1st-3rd– then we moved on to a 3-rm schoolhouse (K-6, 1 teacher for ea 2-gr schoolroom) for 4-6. The only thing that has changed there in 60 yrs is that villages have consolidated, & age 6-11 have to spend an hr/day bused instead of 20 mins/day walking/riding, to get to a larger school w/better teacher: student ratio.
And that small-ish town doesn’t compare to the far-flung small towns of Wyo, the Dakotas, AK, et al, where kids ride an hour each way just to consolidate enough pupils into an affordable school. This is already an expensive proposition for the populace, which certainly cannot support any add’l publically-supported schools in the mix, & shouldn’t be reqd to.
LikeLike
My very rural school was consolidated from 9 other schools in the 1950s. Adding charters to the mix. of rural schools, is actually just turning back the clock to a bunch of underfunded, understaffed, under-attended schools, servicing the same, very small group of students, which is why we consolidated in the first place! Why go backwards?
LikeLike
Thanks for stating that so succinctly! What Charles is not recognizing is that alternative schools– given the availability of a share of rural citizens’ hard-earned tax dollars to use as operating funds– do indeed crop up, skimming enrollment from the public by offering ‘different’: maybe closer, smaller classes, maybe different curriculum &/or pedagogy. Allowing this to happen is ignoring the reality: the only way rural communities can afford to provide K-12–at all– is by pooling regional funds. Breaking up those funds– at all– immediately compromises what is already a fragile economic system.
Perhaps he misunderstands the degree of poverty in rural areas. If upstate-NY were separated from downstate above the Rockland/Putnam county borders, it would be the poorest state in the nation.
LikeLike
But DeVoodoo doesn’t care much for rural America. In fact, DeVoodoo really only cares about herself. So sad.
LikeLike
Oh, they don’t care. Public schools aren’t even considered in any of these schemes.
Public schools are barely discussed. Look at any DC “ed reform” event. It’s 90% charters and vouchers.
Public schools are an unfashionable afterthought. None of these people value existing public schools at all. They’d happily replace all of them with a 5000 voucher.
LikeLike
Look at any state run by ed reformers and tally up the time the politicians spend on charters/vouchers versus public schools.
They do absolutely NOTHING for public schools.
They don’t value your schools and they don’t care what happens to them, They make this clear every single day.
North Carolina lawmakers literally spend every legislative session on vouchers and charters.
“Students could gain admission to charter schools based on where their parents work or where they live under legislation that would make significant changes in the ways the schools fill their classrooms.
The state House is considering a collection of bills that would change who can start a charter and how quickly the schools can grow. Corporations would be able to reserve spaces in schools for their employees’ children, and two towns would be able to set up charter schools for their residents. Under current law, charters are open to any student in the state, although schools can give preference to siblings and school employees’ children.
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article146471059.html#storylink=cpy
The unfashionable public schools in the state don’t have a single advocate in government.
This is the real legacy of ed reform- how public schools were deliberately and systematically weakened and damaged by ideologues with an agenda.
Your kid. Your public school. That’s who gets hurt by this.
LikeLike
The deceptive call for vouchers was the first racist response to the 1954 Supreme Court ruling on Brown v. Board of Education in which the Court declared that “separate but equal” public schools are inherently unequal and ordered racial integration of the public schools. That ruling triggered “white flight” from public schools to private schools — but parents quickly realized that the tuition cost of private schools was more than they wanted to pay out-of-pocket. That realization led political and private resegregationists to the concoct the “reform” of vouchers, and to sell it to eager parents by deceptively marketing it then —and still today — as merely giving parents a “choice.”
Charter schools are the profit-making part of the “education reform/choice/voucher” movement that has from its very beginnings been rooted in racism. The movement has always had resegregation of America’s schools as its core agenda.
Reports from the NAACP and ACLU have revealed the facts about just how charter schools are resegregating our nation’s schools, as well as discriminating racially and socioeconomically against American children, and last year the NAACP Board of Directors passed a resolution calling for a moratorium on charter school expansion and for the strengthening of oversight in governance and practice. Moreover, a very detailed nationwide research by The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at UCLA shows in clear terms that private charter schools suspend extraordinary numbers of black students.
The 1950’s voucher crusade faded away when it became clear that because of school attendance boundaries no more than a few token blacks would be attending formerly all-white public schools. In 1972 when the Supreme Court finally ordered busing to end the ongoing de facto segregation, the reform movement rose from its grave and has been alive ever since then trying new tactics to restore racial segregation because it’s unlikely that the Court’s racial integration order can ever be reversed. When it became clear in the 1980’s that vouchers would never become widespread, the segregationists tried many other routes to restore racial segregation, and the most successful has been charter schools because charter schools can be sold to blithely unaware do-gooder billionaires as well as to unscrupulous profiteers who recognized charter schools as a way to divert vast amounts of tax money into their own pockets and into the pockets of supportive politicians at every level of government.
An essential part of the strategy to mask their underlying motives has been for segregationists to sell the public on the necessity for charter schools because public schools are allegedly “failing.” With all manner of “research” that essentially compares apples to oranges against foreign nations’ students, and with the self-fulfilling prophecy of dismal public school performance generated by drastic underfunding of public schools, and with condemnation of public school teachers based on statistically invalid student test scores, the segregationists are succeeding in resegregating education in America via what are basically private charter schools that are funded with public money.
The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Education has issued a warning that charter schools posed a risk to the Department of Education’s own goals. The report says: “Charter schools and their management organizations pose a potential risk to federal funds even as they threaten to fall short of meeting the goals” because of the financial fraud, the skimming of tax money into private pockets that is the reason why hedge funds are the main backers of charter schools.
The Washington State Supreme Court, the New York State Supreme Courts, and the National Labor Relations Board have ruled that charter schools are not public schools because they aren’t accountable to the public since they aren’t governed by publicly-elected boards and aren’t subdivisions of public government entities, in spite of the fact that some state laws enabling charter schools say they are government subdivisions. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A “PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL” because no charter school fulfills the basic public accountability requirement of being responsible to and directed by a school board that is elected by We the People. Charter schools are clearly private schools, owned and operated by private entities. Nevertheless, they get public tax money.
Even the staunchly pro-charter school Los Angeles Times (which acknowledges that its “reporting” on charter schools is paid for by a billionaire charter school advocate) complained in an editorial that “the only serious scrutiny that charter operators typically get is when they are issued their right to operate, and then five years later when they apply for renewal.” Without needed oversight of what charter schools are actually doing with the public’s tax dollars, hundreds of millions of tax money that is supposed to be spent on educating the public’s children is being siphoned away into private pockets.
Charter schools should (1) be required by law to be governed by school boards elected by the voters so that they are accountable to the public; (2) a charter school entity must legally be a subdivision of a publicly-elected governmental body; (3) charter schools should be required to file the same detailed public-domain audited annual financial reports under penalty of perjury that genuine public schools file; and, (4) anything a charter school buys with the public’s money should be the public’s property. These aren’t onerous burdens on charter schools; these are only common sense requirements to assure taxpayers that their money is being properly and effectively spent to educate children and isn’t simply ending up in private pockets or on the bottom line of hedge funds.
These aren’t “burdensome” requirements for charter schools — they are simply common sense safeguards that public tax money is actually being used to maximum effect to teach our nation’s children.
NO PUBLIC TAX MONEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GO TO CHARTER SCHOOLS THAT FAIL TO MEET THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE PUBLIC.
LikeLike
A local school here in Fairfax, was just named one of the top 10 schools in the nation. And the top ten high schools in the state of VA, are all located in Fairfax, Alexandria, and Loudoun country (all within 25 miles of my home). I am proud to support such fine public schools.
If a voucher program was ever initiated here in Fairfax, I doubt that there would be many participants.
LikeLike
We Amurikans sure need ourselfs some league tables, eh!!
LikeLike
And guess what? Those areas are incredibly wealthy (I lived in Springfield for a while).
Vouchers won’t affect wealthy districts very much. They WILL affect schools with more struggling populations–the very populations that need more funding and assistance, not less.
LikeLike
All the more reason, that education should not be funded from property tax revenue. See this article:
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/education/99093-two-schools-15-miles-and-worlds-apart
I agree, that where schools are excellent, parents will decline vouchers, and the effect of school choice will be minimal.
If public schools in less-affluent areas, were excellent (FAT CHANCE), there would be no need for vouchers, either.
In 2013, WashDC public schools were spending $29,000 per student per year. See
http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/dc-schools-29349-pupil-83-not-proficient-reading
If spending money were all it took to have excellent schools, WashDC would have excellent schools.
LikeLike