Laura Chapman writes about breaking news:
“Pending a signature by Trump, Republicans have succeeded in making internet privacy a relic of the past. Last week the Senate passed a bill that will give internet service providers (ISPs) the automatic right to make a profit from every bit of data that you and your family, including children, place on your computer through an internet service provider such as Verizon, Comcast, AT&T Inc., or Charter Communications Inc.
“At around 3 pm today, (March, 28, 2017) House Representatives voted to kill legislation intended to enhance internet privacy.
“Moreover, the just-passed legislation makes it a “forever after” impossibility for the restoration of the Obama legislation or anything similar to it. Even if there is a massive breech of ISPs data (e.g., your SS number, credit card information, banking accounts and transactions, health records, your child’s school records and internet activity) the ISP is no longer obliged to notify you.
“House Republicans argued that breeches of privacy can be managed on a “case-by-case-basis.” In other words, the user of the ISP service hires a lawyer and hopes to get satisfaction through a court action. The House Republican argument also featured claims about regulatory overreach stifling innovation and boosting the economy. http://thehill.com/policy/technology/326145-house-votes-to-send-bill-undoing-obama-internet-privacy-rule-to-trumps-desk
“If you are a techie, you might think there is a work-around. This article casts some doubt on that. https://www.wired.com/2017/03/vpns-wont-save-congress-internet-privacy-giveaway/
“It is not clear to me how this bill intersects with The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)–the Federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. The law is supposed to apply to all schools that receive funds under “an applicable program” of the US Department of Education. Since the USDE is being “deconstructed” and the edtech industry and its supporters want internet-based everything, I imagine that lobby will be thrilled with this legislation.
“Further, it is not yet clear how this bill intersects with the privacy and security standards for medical information provided in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), administered by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), now under the leadership of longstanding Republican Thomas E. Price, M.D.
“I listened to the House Republicans and Democrats go back and forth about the bill. None mentioned the ripple effects across other federal agencies.
“Some internet gurus think that the bill also has major implications for national security, making theft and marketing of ISP data lucrative.
“The purpose of this bill was to enable ISPs to seek profits from their data. ISPs operate as monopolies in many regions. They gather your clicks, record your dwell times and all other data that gets you access to the other “retail” tier of the internet—Google, Bing, and specific websites, The ISP lobby wanted the gravy train of profits enjoyed by the “retailers.”

And the GOP moves the U.S. closer to a Big Brother state where they are always watching.
LikeLike
The definition of innovative that is the foundation for those who make a blanket claim that regulation stifles innovation is, “new ways to make more money for the already wealthy.” So by that definition, stifling privacy is innovative. A few years ago, I wrote an article for the Washington Post entitled, “It’s innovative, but is it really better?” The answer turns on answering, “Better for whom?” The answer also turns on examining the values behind claims. See: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/08/04/its-innovative-but-is-it-really-better/?utm_term=.00ba6eaa992b
LikeLike
Great article, Arthur Camins. Thank you. I also read the comments. You are, unfortunately, right.
LikeLike
Will phase two be the repeal of Net neutrality . Going to vomit again .
LikeLike
Just when ya think it can’t get worse, it does. Like Joel, I want to vomit again
LikeLike
Another reason to go off the grid and shop locally.
We just saw a very promising outdoor apparel store close down after less than a year in the neighborhood. They had a sign on the door, NOT thanking their “loyal customers” but warning us that if we continue to save a few bucks, buying online, all we’re going to see in our neighborhoods will be realty offices, nail salons, and The Gap.
On line shopping is so convenient but it’s coming at a cost. In many ways.
LikeLike
The GAP’s Doris Fisher funds the charter school movement. Charter school chains take the local taxes intended for education and, puts them in the pockets of distant operators. When charters morph, into Gates’ for-profit schools-in-a-box, the community loses the economic multiplier benefit of dollars for education, no longer spent locally. Further concentration of wealth in Gates’ hands or, those of distant operators, will mean, no money for real estate, clothes from Old Navy (GAP) or manicures.
LikeLike
Right…but I don’t think the profiteers are interested in looking that far into the future.
LikeLike
Agree.
LikeLike
How can Congress put a “forever after” ban on restoring these protections? It defies common sense, at the very least, and may also violate the Constitution. Imagine if our nation’s founders had banned any other source of energy besides wood and tallow!
The same traitorous Republican Congress members who voted to strip away OUR privacy voted yet again yesterday against requiring pResident Trump to release his tax returns. I wonder if Congress exempted itself from the prvacy provisions?
Should this monstrosity get enacted without a court challenge, I (like several other commentators) can only hope that Anonymous releases reams of browsing data history on these repulsive representatives.
They are literally stripping away our human rights one by one – health care, education, clean air, clean water, and now, privacy.
LikeLike
The legislation was advaced under the Congressional Review Act. That makes it as good as a permanent fixture that cannot be recinded. The CRA process is being used more often and with really dangerous implications. The following website offers some examples and a link to the CRA. More than you probably wanted to know.
http://www.foreffectivegov.org/attempts-use-congressional-review-act-proposed-rules-threaten-all-public-safeguards
LikeLike
Laura, this is horrible. It sounds like we might need a brand new congress and president to nullify the CRA – what a cruel, dangerous “law.”
LikeLike
The Verge reports that Lamar Alexander took $86,000 from the industry that benefits from this legislation- Ohio’s Rob Portman took almost $90,000.
LikeLike
“It is not clear to me how this bill intersects with The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)–the Federal law that protects the privacy of student education records. ” Trump discusses student privacy in this article before becoming President:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/11/donald-trump-close-loopholes-federal-privacy-law-prevent-student-data-mining/
LikeLike