The epicenter of New York’s historic test refusal movement is gearing up for a repeat performance when testing begins on Monday.
The state is hoping that the introduction of computer-based testing will mollify parents but it shouldn’t. Numerous studies have shown that students get lower scores on computer-based tests than on tests that require pencils. Some children–especially in younger grades–are not adept with keyboard skills. Others find that scrolling up and down the online format is confusing as compared to using pencil-and-paper.
But the fundamental problems remain. Many parents and educators don’t like the Common Core. The results are reported far too late to help teachers because their students have moved to another grade. Students are not allowed to discuss the test questions or to learn what they answered right or wrong. In short, the tests have no instructional value. They are simply a way of ranking students without helping them.
They are pointless.
Enough parents understand this, which feeds the opt out movement.
If the Regents and the State Education Department can’t address the genuine concerns of parents, they should stop the testing. Until they do, parents should not allow their children to take the tests.
“Public school districts across Long Island and the state are bracing for what many educators and parents expect to be a fifth consecutive year of Common Core test boycotts in grades three through eight, even as eight districts in Nassau and Suffolk counties and dozens elsewhere introduce computerized versions of the exams.
“The state’s time window for the English language arts test starts Monday and closes a week later, both on the Island and statewide. Extra days were added, as compared with last year’s schedule, to allow flexibility in giving the computer-based exams. The traditional pencil-and-paper tests will be given Tuesday through Thursday.
“Officials in some Long Island districts put estimates of opt-outs at 40 percent to 70 percent of their eligible students.
“Brian Conboy, superintendent of Seaford schools, said he expects the boycott of English exams in his district to run close to last year’s 67.8 percent.
“I’m a firm believer in assessment,” Conboy said. “However, assessment has to be developmentally appropriate for students. In the case of how these assessments rolled out, all trust was lost.”
“Cheryl Haas, who lives in the Hauppauge district and is keeping her twin daughters out of the eighth-grade English test, also predicted that refusals would equal last year’s local rate of 71.9 percent. Haas, a former teacher, agreed that tests must be developmentally appropriate — that is, not beyond students’ age and skill levels.
“Until then, parents will stand united to do what is best for their children,” Haas said.
“Some boycott organizers noted that opt-out rates are difficult to project in advance, because many parents wait until the first week of testing to file refusal forms with their districts.
“More than a year has passed since the state Board of Regents moved to ease anxieties over testing by declaring a moratorium, until the 2019-20 school year, on using test scores in any way that might reflect poorly on students’ academic records or as a component in teachers’ job evaluations.
“The nation’s largest test-resistance movement, with Long Island as its epicenter, has emerged in New York State since 2013. Last April, the number of students in grades three through eight in the two-county region who skipped the English assessment reached 89,036, or 51.6 percent of the total eligible, based on data from 108 districts that responded to a Newsday survey.
“Reasons behind the phenomenon: outrage and anxiety among teachers, parents and students over a series of educational reforms pushed by state and federal authorities, without adequate time for teachers and students to prepare.
“Into the mixture this year add the introduction of computer-based tests.
“Schools in five districts in Suffolk County and three in Nassau are going with the electronic versions: Bridgehampton, Franklin Square, Islip, Massapequa, Mineola, Mount Sinai, Longwood and Remsenburg-Speonk.
“Districts on the Island that are administering tests electronically will do so only in selected schools or on selected grade levels. Other students in those districts will take traditional paper-and-pencil tests, as will students elsewhere.
“Computer-based testing also is scheduled in three nonpublic schools — Our Lady of Lourdes in West Islip, St. Patrick’s in Huntington and St. William the Abbot in Seaford — as well as in three special-education centers run by Eastern Suffolk BOCES.
“State math tests for grades three through eight are scheduled May 1-8.
Both kinds of tests, computer-based and paper-based, require three consecutive days for completion within the Education Department’s specified time periods.
“Statewide, about 150 districts will offer computerized testing in English, and 136 will do the same in math, according to the state Education Department. The state has about 700 districts in all.”

“Brewin’ in New York” (sorry Bob)
How many years will the testing exist
Before it is washed to the sea?
Yes and how many years must the opt-out persist
Before all the schools are test-free?
Yes and how many times can the Guv turn his head
And pretend that he just doesn’t see?
The answer my friend, is brewin’ in New York
The answer is brewin’ in New York
Yes and how many times must the Guv’nor look up
Before he can see the sky?
Yes and how many ears must Cuomo have
Before he can hear parents’ cry?
Yes and how many tests will it takes till he knows
That too many voters will fly?
The answer my friend is brewin’ in New York
The answer is brewin’ in New York
LikeLike
“The Ohio Department of Education has not done a good job of listening. When putting together the state’s proposal to meet the requirements of the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, it has been virtually deaf. But it needs to listen now and delay submitting its final plan so that lawmakers and the public can have additional input.
All states must turn in their plans on either April 3 or Sept. 18. Ohio’s current proposal, which is scheduled to be sent next month, has drawn widespread condemnation for failing to recommend a reduction in the number of mandated tests for students.
State Rep. Teresa Fedor (D., Toledo) speaks with area residents during a forum held at Start High School on the state’s education plan. State Rep. Fedor would like the state to delay submitting the proposed plan until the public has had more input.
The state is planning to keep the total number of tests at 24, which teachers, administrators, and students say takes away from instructional time and has not improved performance. Lowering the total, which ESSA allows, can only be done by a state law change.”
The state backtracked on this and will now consider the concerns of public school parents when making public school policy, which is a first.
They actually did a good job holding meetings and getting diverse input. Unfortunately they then ignored all the information they gathered.
It seems pretty clear to me that public school parents want less of a focus on testing in public schools. They went to these forums and made that clear. I’m baffled why ed refomers insist this is “teachers unions” when parents went to the forums. It’s a weird kind of denial. If people are forced to take the extreme step of “opting out” of your testing schemes it’s probably time to re-examine your testing schemes.
LikeLike
“In short, the tests have no instructional value. They are simply a way of ranking students without helping them.
They are pointless.”
Including NAEP, eh, Diane??
LikeLike
Here in Westminster, CO, we are also gearing up for the tests. In January our principal declared that everything we taught from then on had to be geared toward the PARCC test. This is just unbelievable. Unfortunately there was no discussion about this because of her authoritarian stance. Any disagreements would put your job in jeopardy. I know, I’m a veteran teacher in the process of an “improvement plan” that now matter what I do will result in “failing” and bring me closer to being terminated. The teachers are not allowed to discuss options of not taking the test. Many of the students in my class are a not able to easily read the test much less answer the questions. It is devastating that teaching has come to this in our public school system. So much so that I am taking my leave soon and finding ways to make more of a difference elsewhere.
LikeLike
Results were a mess when OH had mixed testing platforms. Students who took pen and paper tests did decidedly better than students who took the tests on the computers. Students who took the tests on computers were tested not just on dubious content, but on their ability to use the technology — the functionality of which is not always intuitive to use. Little fingers don’t know how to type yet, and that’s also assessed.
Perhaps what bothers me most about the use of tech for testing is that some students get pilot questions — “test” test questions — without knowing it and without getting extra time. Those students have effectively less time to complete the “real” portion of the test because they have more questions to answer. Additionally, the tests aren’t the same from kid to kid. This is not “apples to apples”.
This year, I showed my students the test “blueprint” ODE was to follow. ODE reneged and didn’t bother to tell us. They changed the academic wording of the prompts for the written portions, causing much consternation among my MS kids who had spent weeks on “on demand” writing prep. In the real world, they could ask for clarification from their teacher, their boss, one another. But an assessment that is supposed to measure career and college readiness, they are once again being asked to figure out what the test maker really wants them to write for a “multi paragraph response.” And that’s not real world writing. It’s not real world ANYTHING.
LikeLike
Does anyone remember the missing page in the NYS ELA test booklets from last year? The missing page that teachers were unaware was missing because teachers are not supposed to view the tests themselves? (Some teachers “discovered” the omission in time to instruct their students on what to do. Many others who followed the SED directive were unaware of the omission until the second day of testing, when the page was still missing…)
I’m saddened that this detail (the missing page and all that implies) seems to have been forgotten. While I understand there is a multitude of issues to be distracted by these days, in the context of the testing issue, I think this really does rise to a level of concern that it should be part of the conversation. It certainly should have invalidated the scores of all students who took a test with a missing page last year. (I don’t care about the scores, but the State certainly does. As do the many parents who got those dreadful letters reporting that their children were not college and career ready based on those scores…)
And it seems eminently reasonable that the test publishing company should have had some consequence for such an error. And maybe even should lead all to wonder about a host of other errors and omissions that might not be as obvious to notice…
Some questions I’ve been wondering as I prepare for administering the ELA students to my students this week:
Was there ever an investigation into the test company’s checks and balances?
Did the State of NY taxpayers have to cover the full cost of flawed test publishing?
Did any test psychometricians review the data to see if the results could be considered valid?
Were testing protocols reviewed to see if it really is so wise to instruct teachers to not look at the tests they give their students?
(to mention a few…)
While I’ve been so distracted by the daily assaults on our democracy from so many directions and forces, reviewing the teacher instruction pamphlet handed out in our staff meeting last week reminded me I can’t not wonder about these unanswered questions.
LikeLike