At the end of 2015, Congress finally replaced No Child Left Behind–ten years late–with a new law called Every Student Succeeds. The two names actually mean exactly the same thing, and mean nothing at all. Does anyone really believe that a federal law will cause “no child” to be “left behind,” or that “every student” will “succeed”? Washington ships out some money and some mandates, and therefore what? Hyperbole.
No Child Left Behind introduced an unprecedented level of federal control of education, a function traditionally left to the states. The federal contribution of about 10% of overall education funding enabled the government via NCLB to set conditions, specifically to require that every child in grades 3-8 must be tested in reading and math every year. Based on test scores, teachers and principals have been fired, and schools have been closed for not reaching unrealistic targets. NCLB was an intrusive, misguided, evidence-free law that was uninformed by knowledge of children, communities and pedagogy.
Arne Duncan twisted the screws on schools with his absurd Race to the Top. Education is not a race, and there is no top. But once again, the standardized tests became the measure and the purpose of education.
After 15 years of NCLB and RTTT, there is a great deal of wreckage, demoralized teachers, and widespread teacher shortages. And if the point of all that testing was to reach the top of international tests and/or close the achievement gaps among groups, it didn’t happen.
ESSA attempted to heal some of the harm done by NCLB and RTTT. It limited the power of the Secretary of education, to prevent another out-of-control Duncan. But it left in place the federal mandate for annual testing of all children in grades 3-8. This mandate has warped education for nearly two decades but civil rights groups became convinced by the the Gates Foundation that these norm-referenced tests were the pinnacle of civil rights protection. This was the height of absurdity: black and Latino children, as well as students with disabilities, are disproportionately ranked in the bottom half of the normed curve because these tests accurately reflect family income and education. Normed tests, by definition, have a top and a bottom, and the gaps never close, by design.
Pushed by DC think tanks, Democrats became convinced that the testing regime introduced by George W. Bush was the linchpin of the civil rights movement. They fought to retain Bush’s testing mandates, which themselves were based on the hoax of the fraudulent “Texas miracle.” Testing did not make Texas #1, but this fraud was the foundation of NCLB.
So Democrats insisted that the new law had to include annual testing because the civil rights groups wanted it. What a coalition: civil rights groups, Democrats, Republican accountability hawks, and Republicans eager to prove the phony claim that public schools are subpar.
And now we have ESSA. The Senate just voted to kill the accountability regulations of ESSA drafted by the Obama regulations. This post at a Education Week explains what was killed and what remains. It’s complicated. Not surprisingly, it turns out that the Obama administration staffer who wrote the defunct regulations now works for Jeb Bush’s accountability-crazed, privatization-loving “Chiefs for Change,” the most rightwing state and local superintendents.
Peter Greene explains here that it is a mess because it is a collection of generalities. No one agrees how it should be interpreted. Former Secretary John King wanted it to mean that nothing had changed with the replacement of NCLB, but Senator Alexander was not having that.
Greene says there are no heroes here, just confusion.
In the meantime, ESSA sits there, uninterpreted and unclear, a stunning example of how badly top-down rules can go wrong– if the people at the top can’t get their act together and figure out what they want the rules to mean, all you get is top-down confusion and paralysis. States, districts and schools have no way of knowing which sets of bad federal rules we’ll have to cope with, but in the meantime we have to keep doing our day to day work. Best of luck to us all.

Thanks Diane. This is coherent and helpful. Still discouraging given the times.
LikeLike
“The Positives of Paralysis”
Paralysis is good
If action’s simply bad
If nothing’s understood
Then nothing should be had
LikeLike
Alternative title “Do No Harm”
LikeLike
Indeed, sometimes (like right now), gridlock is the best you can hope for.
LikeLike
No Student Does Any Harm Act in the works to be certain.
LikeLike
Make it simple, Poet:
Every Child a Winner Act.
Who makes up these BS titles? I liked the original straightforward “Elementary and Secondary Education Act” of 1965. Someone long ago decided to make it aspirational. I think the first renaming was “Goals 2000” in 1994, making the claim that federal law would help us reach goals like “The US will be first in the world in Math and science by 2000.”
Missed again.
LikeLike
It is likely that ESSA will be another waste of resources without positive student gains, much like RTTT. There will probably be another commercial feeding frenzy as corporations vie for a slice of federal public pie while poor students will serve as guinea pigs for more bad ideas.
LikeLike
If I recall correctly, you supported ESSA Diane.
LikeLike
Abigail,
I supported ESSA as a way to get rid of NCLB, Not because I thought it was a good law. It is a stupid, bad law. NCLB was a stupid, vicious, destructive law.
I strongly opposed the annual testing mandate.
LikeLike
Received the weekly email propaganda update from Sen. Portman. In it he explains his decision to be the only Republican who wanted to maintain King’s a “accountability” rules. Note the last paragraph, which is another of his disingenuous tactics to claim the moniker of “being independent:”
Monday, March 6
Portman Opposes Congressional Review Act Proposal to Repeal Bipartisan Education Accountability Measures
U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) announced on Monday that he opposes efforts to repeal the Department of Education’s regulation on accountability and reporting in state plans as implemented through the bipartisan Every Child Succeeds Act (ESSA):
“I do not support repealing the regulation requiring states to provide parents with accurate information on how their students are performing, which will help ensure our schools are accountable for results. These measures balance state flexibility while reinforcing protections for students of color, students with disabilities, and students from low-income families. We must do more to provide a better education for all students, including those who have been traditionally underserved. We have a role to play in helping ensure these children achieve their God-given potential and I urge my colleagues to join me in preserving these protections for students who have too often been marginalized and forgotten.”
NOTE: There is widespread support for preserving these education accountability measures, including from The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, NAACP, National Council of La Raza, National Center for Learning Disabilities, National Disability Rights Network, National Down Syndrome Congress, National Indian Education Association, Alliance for Excellent Education, Easterseals, Teach for America, Association of University Centers on Disabilities, Children’s Defense Fund, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
LikeLike
I just got the same boilerplate from Portman. I started to respond but decided that was a waste of time. Almost every group in that NOTE has received grants from the Gates Foundation to insist on tests. Some time ago I checked at the website of
I am inclined to agree with Steve Nelson that a change in Singapore’s policy is likely to introduce different tests. One example is the reference to “Character scorecards” and “reflection journals,” now “the staple in many primary schools, to allow parents to follow the social and developmental progress of their children.”
The Seligman website offers twenty tests of wellbeing. “Emotional wellbeing” (five tests), “Engagement” (eight tests, including one for 24 character traits in children, also tests for grit and self-control, optimism, forgiveness, gratitude (among others). There are two tests for “Flourishing,” and three tests for “Meaning”—meaningfulness of life, compassion, and attachment. https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/testcenter
In addition to these online tests, Seligman is the Executive director of the Imagination Institute where predictive tests of creativity are being pursued, aided by brain imaging studies and sorting out issues bearing on “normal” and creative activity. http://imagination-institute.org/who-we-are
Then there are/were the school climate surveys developed for ESSA compliance with hundreds of items for students, parents, educators, and non-instructional personnel. The survey contract with American Institutes for Research has expired but you can find still find the survey questions at that website or with the link below. The survey questions are/were intended to measure three broad domains of school climate, each presumed to bear on student wellbeing.
1. Engagement—Cultural and linguistic competence, Relationships, School participation.
2. Safety—Emotional Safety, Physical Safety, Substance Abuse, and Emergency Readiness management.
3. Environment—Physical environment, Instructional environment, Physical health, Mental health, Discipline. https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/edscls
Then there is the other question—elephant in the room. Will the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OCED) alter its tests and the rating system that has made Singapore look so good? How will Singapore manage the potential loss of status as number one on tests administered by the OCED’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)?
In 2014, citizens (including Diane Ravitch) sent a letter to Dr. Andreas Schleicher head of OECD testing. The letter focused on the distortion of education created by the OECD regime of testing and ranking nations by their PISA scores. Here are just a few points in the letter
“By emphasizing a narrow range of measurable aspects of education, PISA takes attention away from the less measurable or immeasurable educational objectives like physical, moral, civic and artistic development, thereby dangerously narrowing our collective imagination regarding what education is and ought to be about.”
•
”As an organisation of economic development, OECD is naturally biased in favour of the economic role of public [state] schools. But preparing young men and women for gainful employment is not the only, and not even the main goal of public education, which has to prepare students for participation in democratic self-government, moral action and a life of personal development, growth and wellbeing.” See the letter and names of signers here.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics
I think that the move by Singapore is a small but important step in asserting that the value of education does not reside in the scores of students on standardized tests. I regret to say that many politicians in the United State, along with “voice groups” supported by billionaire foundations, still think that scores on standardized tests are the only and best way to hold teachers and schools accountable.
LikeLike
This post is scrambled. Sorry. The content from two posts jumped into each other.
LikeLike
All of which was co-opted by Reformers to brow beat teachers and neighborhoods into a pulp, fire teachers, close schools and get their friends’ hands on the never-ending trough of taxpayer dollars via technology upgrades that states could ill afford, tests tests tests from Pearson, and for profit no excuses charters that suspended kindergartners for untied shoes or the wrong shade of blue socks. I cannot imagine any of these hoity toidies believed it was good for the children to do the horrendous things they did, but it was one big fun club with tax breaks for the rich and profits for the rich. Also, why would the Walton family want a smart society? No, they want us dumb enough to push a button. Now what? They’ve made a mess. Perhaps this is the beginning of the end of the reformist state? One can hope.
LikeLike
The Waltons have several goals:
1) get rid of unions
2) create an obedient workforce.
The Waltons currently have 1 million employees in the US. The Waltons are billionaires. If they paid their employees $15 an hour, they could reduce poverty and help children. They prefer to keep their taxes low, expand non-union charters, and pour millions into TFA to keep building the non-union workforce for their charters
LikeLike
“the hoax of the fraudulent ‘Texas miracle.’ Testing did not make Texas #1, but this fraud was the foundation of NCLB”
G. W. Bush used this hoax to brag during his 1st run for president, but few knew the truth.That Texas set the bar for competency at 4th grade for those tests compared to California that set 9th grade for competency.
LikeLike
I explained the Texas miracle hoax in “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education”
LikeLike
“uninterpreted and unclear” feels to fit in perfectly with the general noise now becoming the NORM in Wash DC
LikeLike
The brand new bill that they all call ESSA
Is filled with boondoggles, we all must confessa.
The students still are testing
Their peers they hope of besting
But what they get
When all is done
Is not more but lessa.
With apologies to our poet.
LikeLike