Now that Republicans control the Governorship and the Legislature in Kentucky, they finally got a billauthorizing privately run charters through the lower house of the legislature. Kentucky is one of the few states that does not allow charters, or has been until now. In the world of Republican politics, it is important not to be different. One must run with the crowd, even if they are running off a steep cliff. Republicans look enviously to their neighbor Tennessee, which has wasted millions of dollars on charters and performs well below Kentucky on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Why Kentucky wants to emulate a lower-performing state is anyone’s guess. Call them lemmings.
On Friday, the Kentucky House passed House Bill 520 after four hours of debate. The bill would legalize charter schools in the state of Kentucky.
Charter schools are publicly funded but privately run schools.
The bill was introduced in the General Assembly by Representative John Carney, a Republican from Campbellsville. While it does not set a cap on the number of schools, Carney said the state will likely start the program with three to five schools in areas that need them most.
The schools would be approved for five years and the reassessed and renewed for another five years or shut down.
“This should be a bipartisan matter. This is about our kids,” Carney said.
According to Hal Heiner, the Kentucky Education and Workforce Development’s Cabinet Secretary, students do not have proper support systems and that is causing schools to fail.
“We have to add to what we have to meet the needs of children” Hal Heiner, Kentucky Education and Workforce Development Cabinet Secretary said.”We need specialization.”
Heiner said a charter school, which had the ability to provide year-round education and three meals a day to students, can help underprivileged students.
Kentucky is one of seven states without charter school laws.
“Every dollar going to charter school is not going to a public school in that district.” Kentucky Education Association President Stephanie Winkler said. “This bill gives local school boards little room to maneuver.”
Even if a school board rejects an application, which the bill says it can’t do if the application is in order, an applicant can appeal to the state’s school board.
During the meeting, Rep. Phill Moffett (R – Jefferson) added a measure to give a mayor permission to accept a charter application as well.
“We’ve got to stop accepting this stuff and we need to work together to make sure we educate these children better,” Rep. Moffett, a longtime supporter of charter schools said.
Louisville pastor Milton Seymour said the bill helps end achievement gaps in low-end neighborhoods.
This is the civil rights movement of the 21st century,” Seymour said. “If we don’t do something for our children, then shame, shame, shame.”
Achievement gaps exist but charter schools are not the answer according to Winkler. Winkler continued her opposition to the bill by saying that all states with charter schools still have gaps.
“If charter schools were the answer to the student achievement gaps in this state, the professionals that trained to teach children would be advocating for them too,” Winkler said in an emotional speech.
While it is unfortunate to see Kentucky join the parade of failed school reforms by permitting privatization of public school funds, the one bright side is that the bill is very disappointing to corporate reformers. Jeanne Allen of the Center for Education Reform, which has been touting privatization for many years, wrote up her criticism:
The lower house of the Kentucky legislature passed HB520 this afternoon, a bill which in all but isolated cases strengthens the hands of school districts to limit charter schooling in Kentucky.
Applicants wanting to open a charter school in the state will first have to get permission from the district, which experience shows is rarely given in the absence of a swift and binding appeal to the state board of education or multiple chartering authorizers.
While an amendment offered by Representative Phil Moffett adding the Mayors of Louisville and Lexington as authorizers improved the bill, other changes, including a provision barring charters from contracting with businesses to support and manage their schools, and barring online education, made it much worse.
The Kentucky Education Association president opposed even the dramatically scaled back version of the measure. As has been typical elsewhere, Kentucky school boards and superintendents have been lobbying hard against charter schools, and creating fear among rural legislators that charter schools would drain their school funding.
What? No for-profit management! No disastrous cyber charters! A few points of light in an otherwise dismal decision that will defund public schools in Kentucky and NOT help the kids who need excellent teachers and good public schools.

In my opinion the worst thing that will happen is not the charter schools themselves, but the effect on legislators and state government.
Kentucky residents can forget about getting any more support for their existing public schools. Every school debate will be exclusively focused on charters- expanding them, regulating them, comparing them to public schools and on and on and on.
All work on public schools will come to a halt as all the legislators reach for the easy fix of answering every concern or question with “choice!”
It lets them off the hook for public schools, and they know it. It’s one of the reasons politicians love it. From the day forward they have an easy answer to what they’re doing for public education- offering “choice”. It becomes literally all they talk about. Public schools either slip off the agenda completely or are used only as a comparison point for charters.
Year before last in Ohio we had an entire legislative session devoted to charters and 90% of the kids in this state attend public schools. The public school superintendents has to rally outside the statehouse to get the politicians to pay attention to them.
“Choice” is easy for them. It requires absolutely nothing. They pass a law, pat each other on the back, hand out contracts to private entities and viola! they’ve “fixed” education. OF COURSE they all love it.
LikeLike
True. They then have no accountability when students do not succeed. They can say well we gave them choice and it didn’t work. Not our problem anymore.
LikeLike
Forget about asking for adequate funding for public schools. After all, parents have “:choice”! So what if the public school is falling down? They can simply “vote with their feet” and go to another school.
They’ll also tell people this won’t cost any additional money. That’s a key piece of what it’s so popular. It’s magical thinking. New schools, no additional funding. It’s a politicians dream come true.
I think about what it took to get a new school here to replace a older dilapidated school- 3 public referendums on funding, tens of community meetings, 3 revisions to the plans for the new school.
If I’m a charter operator in Ohio I just sign a contract and open a school. Much, much easier then the public school process because it doesn’t include pesky members of the public who gum up the works.
LikeLike
Kentuckistanis may be that dumb but lemmings are not. That is a myth perpetrated by an old Disney film.
LikeLike
What I don’t understand is why can’t more school districts offer their own schools that offer parents some of the incentives that make charter schools so enticing? This way public school districts will provide the competition to those publicly funded charter schools. The true inequity comes when you look at what many suburban schools provide in comparison to the schools in the same district but serve students of color and or low ses. It is truly a funding disparity and a lack of understanding of the culturally sensitive issues and practices that must be implemented in schools that serve a majority of Students of color and or low ses.
LikeLike
Mary B,
What do you consider as “the incentives that make charter schools so enticing”? List them please, TIA, Duane
LikeLike
I am not saying they are enticing to me but to many parents. The enticements are: longer school day and year, emphasis on math and reading, safer schools, Saturday schools, ability to meet with teachers often, cater to certain ethnic populations. I have heard more but I can’t think of them at this time.
LikeLike
Thanks, just wondering what those “incentives” were. Now if I may address those “incentives”.
Longer school day and year–Why not let kids be kids and have free time to explore and develop on their own, interacting with each other without the constant supervision of parents or other authority figures? Hell, we were basically booted out of the house in the morning and expected to come back for lunch, then outdoors again til dinner and then out till called in. All that time spent without adult supervision. Wow, how did we make out of childhood alive?
Emphasis on math and reading–there is already too much emphasis on math and reading to the detriment of other subject/interest areas. We need less emphasis on Math and LA.
Safer schools–yep, when you can weed out the “bad” kids and can homogenize your students it makes it a hell of a lot easier to provide a decent teaching and learning process. But by creaming the supposedly “best students” out of the public schools that ends up leaving the public schools with a lot more difficult population with which to deal. No thanks!!
Saturday schools-Screw that crap! Let kids be kids, 60 hour work weeks don’t work for adults why would they work for children?
Ability to meet with teachers often–Same opportunity exists in the public schools, how many parents take advantage of that fact??
Cater to certain ethnic populations–Can we say separate but not equal and segregation?
So much for those “enticements” eh!?!
LikeLike
Most public schools already offer more options to students than most “one size fits all” charters. Small districts sometimes pool resources to offer special education or vocational education. Many large public districts also offer public magnet schools with a specialized focus such as the arts, science, business, or technology.
Kentucky, which has one of the highest rates of heroin addition, had the wisdom to expand Medicaid. They have been able to offer treatment rather than jail to addicts, and the results have been promising. Without the ACA, many lives will be lost in Kentucky and elsewhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent response Duane!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the kind words, Abigail!
LikeLike
I’m with Abigail. How does one translate the New Orleanian “Yeah you right!” into Spanish?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sí señor, tiene Ud. razón.
LikeLike
Yes, Duane. Your reply to Mary B’s “incentives” is spot on.
LikeLike
Ohio has a limited form of open enrollment and I just don’t think “competition” is productive. I can’t prove it but it seems like the students with discipline or academic problems are just moving from school to school. There’s a kind of “specialization” happening too and it doesn’t really work in a more rural area because many parents can’t do all this driving. We have one district that has become the district that specializes with kids with disabilities which is fine unless you’re a kid in that district who doesn’t have one.
A lot of ed reform is predicated on huge population centers and tight geographical parameters. It doesn’t work at all outside big cities.
LikeLike
Here’s what Kentucky can look forward to. Next legislative session will be the debate over expanding charters. After that there be the debate over increasing funding to charters for “facilities funding”. Then they’ll require a special ranking system for charters – that’s another ten months of work for politicians. After that the voucher political campaign begins. Set aside two years for that.
Years will go by and they won’t do a day’s work on public schools because why should they? They provided “choice!” The only time public schools will be mentioned will be when they’re demanding “data” and THAT will only be used to compare public schools to charter and private schools.
Ohio is JUST NOW coming out of what was 2 decades of charter/voucher mania. Public schools took a real hit as a result of lawmakers falling head over heels in love with “choice”. They seem to have returned to the senses in Ohio, but Kentucky is just starting. It gets worse before it gets better.
LikeLike
Are teachers in favor of this? If not they should be out in the streets!
LikeLike
No Maria, I am a 4th grade teacher and I am not in favor of this. I call and voice my opposition. I am so busy working on lessons and ways to help my students that being out in the streets is not an option right now. Where will the teachers for these charter schools come from and what kind of education will they have? I really believe that if they are going to demand that we have charter schools, the charter schools should not be able to turn any student away and they will have to follow federal laws pertaining to students with disabilities. Including providing a full time aide to be with a student if the student requires one. Some even require a nurse to be with them at all times. They should have to take all students no matter what and lovingly accept and teach them.
LikeLike
I was born in Louisville, and educated at public schools in Lexington and Bowling Green. I will be watching this development closely. I am not optimistic about charter schools passing this year. In rural counties, the public school system is often the largest employer in the county. The rural areas have political influence, that is ahead of the urban areas.
LikeLike