Betsy DeVos gave a speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), explaining that the programs created by George W. Bush and Barack Obama had failed, and she would replace them with her own ideas. She did not point out that her own ideas have failed too. Just look at the mess she has made of Michigan, where the state’s rankings on the federal test (NAEP) have plummeted, and where Detroit is a mess thanks to the miasma of school choice.
DeVos argued Thursday that education is failing too many students, pointing to “flatlined” test scores (presumably on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, also called the Nation’s Report Card) and more than 1.3 million youth who drop out of school each year. The Obama administration’s $7 billion investment in overhauling the worst schools, called the School Improvement Grant program, didn’t work, DeVos said, making reference to a study by the administration that found no increase in test scores or graduation rates at schools that got the money.
“They tested their model, and it failed miserably,” she said. She emphasized that she was not indicting teachers.
She has said that she wants to return as much authority over education as possible to states and districts, and intends to identify programs and initiatives to cut at the Education Department. She has also made clear that she intends to use her platform to expand alternatives to public schools, including charter schools, online schools and private schools that students attend with the help of public funds.
“We have a unique window of opportunity to make school choice a reality for millions of families,” she said. “Both the president and I believe that providing an equal opportunity for a quality education is an imperative that all students deserve.”
Her own model of vouchers has not a single success to its name: evaluations of voucher programs in Milwaukee, Cleveland, the District of Columbia, Louisiana, and Indiana have found no gains for the students enrolled in voucher schools. Parents are happier, but that’s not a good reason to destroy public schools.
The overwhelming majority of charter studies have found that charters perform no better than public schools unless they exclude children with disabilities, English language learners, and behavior problems. When the charters kick them out, they go back to the public school, which must take them.
Cybercharters have been proven to be disastrous failures in every state. In Tennessee, the Tennessee Virtual Academy is the lowest performing school in the state. Ohio boasts the cybercharter with the lowest graduation rate in the nation, called Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow.
DeVos does not have a single innovative idea. It is the same old retreads of the privatization movement.
I recommend that she read “Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools,” where I patiently demonstrated, using data from the U.S. Department of Education that American students as of 2013 had the highest test scores in our history–for all groups, white, black, Hispanic, and Asian; the highest graduation rates in history; the lowest dropout rates in history.
The scores flatlined from 2013 to 2015, and that may have been because of the application of the Common Core standards and the disruptions foisted upon the schools by Obama and Duncan for the past eight years.
DeVos has proven that she is unqualified to be Secretary of Education. She is not dumb, she is just ignorant. She should do some reading and break free of her ideological contempt for public schools.

Let’s tweet her to read: Reign of Error!
LikeLike
Great idea, Yvonne. Send her tweets. Time to learn.
LikeLike
I’m tempted to just send her a copy. Maybe if many of us send copies???
LikeLike
They can use them for their book burnings.
LikeLike
TOW,
Great idea!
Diane
LikeLike
DeVos does not have any education of her own. Her ideas come from people like Jeb Bush and others like him. One must be able to think for oneself in order to have successful ideas that can be successfully implemented. It is my strong belief that DeVos cannot think for self when it comes to education.
LikeLike
Online, virtual, cyber, whatever you want to label this type of education is one of the poorest attempts at quality education that I have ever seen. Some teachers simply do not have a good grasp of that type of classroom and the motivational strategies that work best within that format. Additionally, some students need much more attention than is associated with this format in many cases. From beginning to end I see Devos as an unqualified, negligent Sec. Of Ed. If she wants to do a good job and student learning really is her top priority, she should learn something about the classroom.
LikeLike
I think online, virtual, cyber and variants are NOT attempts to provide quality education. They are cost-cutting measures and they delegate teaching to algorithms created by quants. This is programmed instruction, vintage mid-century last, with some extra code and other bells and whistles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. I know one instructor who was excetional in this format when she was teaching. However, she was so involved with the students that she left no other option but for them to learn. I haven’t seen another duplicaye her style.
LikeLike
Online school came to us when graduation rate began to be the most important metric by which schools were measured. I have worked in that environment and have found mixed results. I know of no alternative to something like that for students who are needing individual education programs. No one can afford a parent for each student who is also a teacher. Still, with the quality of instruction in on-line software and the numbers of children that do not succeed with classroom instruction, it is difficult to see this as an alternative at all.
LikeLike
In no particular order:
A) Once you reach a certain age, ignorant and dumb merge. That age is perhaps 30. A small point.
B) That vouchers and charters have only deeply “manufactured” successes and nothing but true failures is in fact a huge point for our side but is unfortunately not the metric the other side (DeVos’) is using. The only metric their side is using is the very same metric that all exploitative privatizing capitalists have always used: profit. We make a mistake building our resistance upon a weapons system that has been proven, time and again, to not even scratch the other side…..the weapons system of logical, rational, academic-study-based, policy-analysis based proof. Means nothing to not only the privatizers but also the broader public and media. Some may argue otherwise, but really, we’ve been running that game for years now. And we are still aggressively losing. We have to find another way to fight these people. How have people successfully fought against commons-privatizing capitalists in the past?
There is an answer there.
LikeLike
NYS Teacher,
I am sorry to say that you are right. The privatizers don’t care about evidence or reason or even appeals to patriotism and tradition.
What is the key to unlock their closed minds?
LikeLike
Historically there is no unlocking their minds and swinging them to our side. The forces of psychology (the evidence is pretty certain that there are distinct psychologies involved with deep capitalists), history, and raw profit are too great to ever see that as a goal. Changing hearts and minds isn’t our path…..which is hard for myself and anyone else who has built their lives around teaching.
Our only goal should be to win the fight. In this circumstance, considering the above point, that means somehow creating a resistance that, to defeat it or circumvent it, would cost reformers more than the potential profits they stand to make. Much like a predator won’t attack a prey whose resistance will require more calories to overcome than the prey can supply. Considering the nature of raw, privatizing capitalism we are up against here, that is the only way to win…..make it so difficult for them than its not worth it. A very tall order considering the potential profits involved.
How? Well this is where my continual, ad nauseum, repetitive to the point of being obnoxious, rants about labor-based, aggressive movement type organizing comes in. What is required is probably one of the biggest labor-type movements of our lifetimes if we want to pull off what is required. Every singly detail of the reform movement, their agenda, their statements, and their actions, NEED to be countered and stood in front of. We have to make every detail and every move cost them and exhaust them. Pulling that off will require reserves of creativity, organization, humor, focused anger, guts, and risk that unfortunately has been reflected in our unions leadership and membership at the level of zero (0). It’s why tepid union leadership over the past 10 years has been so angering. It’s why awful leadership like Weingarten’s had been beyond angering. The stakes are so high and we seem to barely see that we are facing the absolute existential crisis of public education writ large.
We can’t depend on the public clicking in here. They will here and there. Sporadically. But the only people whose lives are built around education are the people working in it. (I know, there area by feel-good platitudes about how education impacts everyone….ok.). Waiting in the moment of public outrage against the privatizing movement is a fool’s errand. Some folks will get pissed, others won’t. The reform narrative, lets not forget, has been marinating unopposed for a decade plus with the public. The fight against privatizing reformers is a teachers fight. We’d love help, but there are no saviors and its our livelihoods on the line. Parents age out of the school system with their kids.
In the end, the labor movement (30s style) model is the one we need here. That’s the real answer. A jacked up, refined, better version of that eras union movement. We have a reform movement that is staring literally at an ocean of profit. We have to create a wall in front of them that will cost them more than that ocean.
This is why I’m not so hopeful and kind of a downer in my posts here.
LikeLike
This is an informative article that explains the corporate take over of school systems all over the world. “Going hand in hand with “free” trade and development, the privatization of education is simply another step towards corporate control of the entire economy.” The author believes social and environmental activists need to join with educators to fight privatization of education. This article can be tweeted out –posted on social media—to educate the public about the “big picture” we are up against. “Education has profound implications for the economy, for human wellbeing, and for the future of life on this planet. It is about both what and how we teach children. Do we want private investors and corporations to decide that? If not, then those of us in the new economy and environmental movements need to join our voices to those of the education activists and resist further privatization.”http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/07/14/education-next-corporate-frontier
LikeLike
I don’t know about changing minds, when what’s happening now is contrary to what a lot of Trump supporters thought was going to happen, yet many still can’t see it and continue to support him. It happens to be precisely what most reasonable people predicted would take place though: billionaire businessman Trump is now spearheading the corporate/ALEC/GOP/TeaParty plan to privatize America’s assets, public lands, services etc., because there’s lots of money to be made from that. (Every now and then, he will probably throw a bone to his base, such as by following through on campaign promises like the ban on Muslim immigrants.) But Trump, his entourage and Congress all need to be addressed directly and repeatedly, such as with the Town Hall meetings across the country lately, which have been a surprise and a wake up call to politicians.
Here are more options:
“Michael Moore Steps Up With Resistance Calendar and Website Devoted to Stopping President Trump: He offers his 10-step program to rally the troops for the long-term resistance battle.”
http://www.alternet.org/activism/michael-moore-steps-resistance-calendar-and-website-devoted-stopping-president-trump
LikeLike
Here is Michael Moore’s Resistance Calendar, which lists many happenings all over the country that people should plan to attend, so that you can voice your concerns to your local representatives:
https://www.resistancecalendar.org/
LikeLike
NYSTEACHER
I am afraid that we both know that the Union movement is not quite up to the task actually never has been not even in the thirty’s. It has always been hobbled by individual Unions cutting one anothers throats. . There was a much broader movement at play threatening the status quo that made the AFL seem like the moderates in the room.
It was radical Socialist / Communist controlled steel unions threatening a nationwide strike with violence, as the economy was just starting to recover, that forced Roosevelt’s hand in the summer of 1935. The NLRA had stalled before that, not enough Dixiecrat’s..Then Roosevelt and the AFL delivered the NLRA (Wagner act ) and the radical Amalgamated Association of Iron, Steel, and Tin Workers. were appeased..
We will only win this as part of a much broader based social movement that drags the Democrats much further to the left and leaves the Republicans in the dust bin of history. Short of a broad based movement, all will be crushed individually . The Union movement already is splintered with some construction trades seeking to stroke Trumps ego hoping to be spared and the hell with everyone else. The good news 48% of democratic voters say they are now more political than they were before the election.
A Martian has landed in DC and awoken a sleeping giant. The same poll that showed Trump at record lows, also showed that seventy something percent of Democratic voters feel the Party will not go far enough in opposing Trump. Trump may not be the problem the Democrats may be. We will know more after Saturday . It could be the Democrats relegated to the dust bin of history. Or it could be a very busy spring. .
LikeLike
Joel,
I agree completely with your assessment. What I was asking for was labor militancy 1930s style but without the catalog of problems that existed then and now. In that, my call was deeply ahistorical.
Like you, I also agree that an enormous broad-based social movement that, as you say, drags the Democratic Party well to the left would be the only other path here…..equally ahistorical. In our particular case of fighting public school privatizers, this is even further problematized by the fact that the entire Democratic Party is institutionally aligned with the reformers/privatizers. Dragging the party left, while fantastic, would not necessarily help us in the slightest. Perhaps the main victory thus far of the reform movement has been its triumph, via rhetoric and language, of making reform an easily swallowed pill on the left. So, on that front I am also nowhere near hopeful.
The fact is that our side has not made a strongly pro-public school/unionized teacher agenda a not-to-be-abandoned part of the democratic party’s platform or the broader left’s platform. Unionized teachers are possibly the most shining example of what happens when victories are won and vigilance is neglected. Our union leadership is but a mere symptom of that.
So, we return to where we began. So far the only two broad paths that we can imagine for winning this are ahistorical and frought with serious challenges. Maybe the path forward is the simplest one of all, and one with some historical precedent: raw resistance. Perhaps from that a more clear vision of a way to win is possible. I just don’t see it, and I am nearly out of any real hope. Us teachers still occupy, every day, schools. The works, if we think about it, can be gummed up yet.
I don’t know.
I have about 16 more years until my sweet reward of retirement. I no longer think I will make it. That’s just the truth. Walmart greeter maybe?
LikeLike
NYSTeacher:
I’m about 16 years away from retirement too. Today, for some reason, I’m optimistic. It helps to think about Galileo: what an uphill battle he and other free thinkers of the 16th-18th centuries had winning over the public. We already have 150 million on our side. The benighted ones are not the majority. Gay rights won’t go back to the Dark Ages. Health care won’t go back to the 19th C. We’re on our heels now, but we won’t be toppled.
LikeLike
The NYS Retirement Fund is extremely solvent, so the teachers in NYS are safe unless the public votes to change the New York Stare Constitution – a three year process that starts with November’s election (unless we all vote NO).
So the voters of NYS are our greatest threat at the moment, not necessarily the buffoons in DC.
LikeLike
NYS Teacher
Again we do not disagree . Several points
“Perhaps the main victory thus far of the reform movement has been its triumph, via rhetoric and language, of making reform an easily swallowed pill on the left. So, on that front I am also nowhere near hopeful.”
This is not a tactic aimed solely at education and teachers .
It is far more broad based .
The repeal of Prevailing Wage being portrayed as a civil rights issue
Right to Work being portrayed as a basic freedom , as Unions are forced to represent the freeloaders.
Tort Lawyers being villainized as corporations make sure your great grand children will be dead before you finish the appeals process.
The assault on regulation rather than the the underlying ills they seek to address.
Trade is portrayed as a global good rather than picking winners and losers. The losers always being in the working class of all nations be it Mexican farmers who flee North not new Mexican factories but to American cities, far more displaced farmers than new factory jobs . Or American factory workers who see their factory close and their towns die . ….
The winners, where is Bernie “All new income gains are going to the 1%”
And many other examples of this right wing assault.
So you are right
“the most shining example of what happens when victories are won and vigilance is neglected. “Our (Political vs Union ) leadership is but a mere symptom of that.”
The failures are across the board ,it is the neo liberal ,right wing economic philosophy adopted by the the Clintons/Obama NDC/DLC
Democrats . So now we have a right wingnut party and a center right party that can’t even separate itself from big Pharma. Can’t separate long enough long enough to allow Americans to import drugs from Canada that are not produced in America anyway.
One hopeful note was the NAACP position on charters is a rejection of that economic philosophy. Had they rejected Clinton in the primaries ,we would possibly be in a far different place .
It is stomach wrenching to see Trump a faux populist playing on issues that should have been Democratic issues . From trade, to immigration,to education… These are all areas that have progressive solutions.
So lets see where we go this Saturday because anymore failure to address the rot at the heart of the Democratic party and we will be stuck with a right wing nation for many decades.
LikeLike
Pitch forks and barn fires or the fear of them.
LikeLike
The Republican town hall meetings right now are a great model for resistance. Many elected Republicans, Senators and House members, are dodging them because they are being overwhelmed by hostile questions about their health care and other issues that directly affect people. This is Indivisibles at work.
LikeLike
I agree and mass demonstration ignited that. Mass demonstration will keep the momentum going
LikeLike
Nysteacher
Your point about rational, evidence based arguments not working on folks like Duncan and DeVos is key.
Climate scientists made the same mistake of assuming that if only they could present the facts, people would come around. People like Rex Tillerson don’t come around — except to frack in your yard.
But the problem is that these people are not interested in facts, especially not ones that interfere with their ideology driven goals.
“Reasoning with the unreasonable”
Reason only works
With reasonable folks
If doesn’t work with jerks
And doesn’t work with jokes
It doesn’t work on those
With evil moneyvations
Unreasonable to suppose
That reason rules relations
“Where we went wrong”
Where we erred was giving
The benefit of the doubt
To folks who make a living
By counting others out
Finally, we must always remember: can’t spell “devious” without D-E-V-O-S
LikeLike
“DeV[i]o[u]s”
It really is quite devious
Omitting “I” and “u”
It’s absolutely mischievous
DeVos knows what to do
LikeLike
When an individual’s own college declares that individual unqualified to hold a position, shouldn’t someone pay attention? She has had years to educate herself about her “passion” to provide quality educational choices for all children. Where is the evidence that she has made any attempt to do so?
LikeLike
Now is the time for public schools to up their game. One important and cheap fix: overhaul curriculum. Ditch Common Core. Start teaching about the world again, instead of fruitless mental “muscle” workouts. This will delight and empower kids, and please fussy parents. This curriculum plus union benefits that draw the best teachers will beat shabby charters and worker-exploiting private voucher academies every time.
LikeLike
Agree!
LikeLike
We have no brains but we’re forging ahead with the brain-transplants! Scarecrow, just keep clutching that diploma, it’s all you need. Don’t read the fine print though.
LikeLike
Ed reform could make these speeches a lot shorter. Get up, say “vouchers and charters”, and then sit down.
It’s all they offer. We’ll all save a lot of time if they drop all the filler.
The ed reform “movement” is the voucher and charter “movement” and that’s all it’s ever been. They’re entirely irrelevant to the 90% of kids and parents in public schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
DeVos’s claims of being her own woman fall flat when we consider who really runs the Big Money educational game. Those now heavily invested in curricula-writing, test-making, computer-developing, etc., are very, very unlikely to change course for her or anyone else.
LikeLike
Did anyone burst the voucher bubble at this event with any of the results in places where we have vouchers?
There are plenty of places with vouchers. Ohio is one of them. They could all go on a field trip and see the wonders of the voucher magic up close.
LikeLike
A better use of a teachers time than predicting how well a student will do in a particular course is to identify why they are failing (or doing well),
In addition, the socioeconomic background should be identified. These statistics (without the individual student being specifically identified) might give us some answers as to why more of our students don’t graduate.
Is language a barrier, learning disabilities, poor attendance, lack of effort (both in class and/or out of class assignments), disruptive behaviors or in a class where several students misbehave so the teacher can’t complete the lesson, missing skills from earlier grades, limited vocabulary, poor reading or math skills, emotional problems, difficulties at home (affected by homelessness, physical verbal or sexual abuse, violence, incarceration of student or family member, death of someone close to the child), divorce or single parent home, teen pregnancy, responsibilities for a sibling or other family member, poverty, malnutrition, lack of the proper clothing, illness, drug and alcohol abuse by the child or within the home, psychological issues, hearing loss, vision impairment without access to corrective lenses, or simply a lack of interest?
I’ve seen all of these.
It would be interesting to analyze why kids fail, in urban, suburban, and rural school districts. If the reasons can be identified, perhaps professionals could devise some appropriate solutions. Even if we assume the current educational models have been set up for the right reasons, without studying the causes we are spitting in the wind.
LikeLike
“The places where the federal government has a role is on special needs and on civil rights,”
And a federal voucher and charter program. Republicans always mysteriously fail to mention that.
There’s a huge federal program devoted to opening charter schools. Shouldn’t Republicans be opposed to it?
LikeLike
Once DC gets the 20 billion federal voucher program off the ground do you think any of the thousands of federal employees will put any time in on public schools?
I know public schools are unfashionable in elite circles but one would think 90% of US students would merit at least a passing mention.
LikeLike
Betsy DeVos is all for “great schools”.
As long as they;re not public schools.
You will not find a positive word about any public school anywhere in ed reform. The best you can hope for is a grudging admission that they probably can’t privatize overnight so they’ll have to suffer the dreaded “government schools” for a while longer.
I don’t even think public school kids, parents or teachers would be welcome at the US Department of Education anymore. They were barely tolerated in the Obama Administration. It’s worse now.
Hell, the US Department of Education doesn’t even HIRE public school graduates!
Public schools are unfashionable.
LikeLike
Chiara,
I have no doubt that the U.S. Department of Ed is staffed with many public school graduates. But that has no impact on policy.
LikeLike
Last time capitalists and their king in the British Empire couldn’t be reasoned with, the 13 British colonies in North America that became the United States rebelled and fought a bloody war for about 8 years to break free from that empire and those capitalists. The rebels even protested by dumping a load of tea in Boston harbor.
Thomas Jefferson wrote that the Tree of Liberty must be nourished with the blood of patriots and tyrants about every 120 years on average.
The Tree of Liberty is way overdue to be nourished.
LikeLike
The goal of privatization is not improvement for all. It is profit, undoing separation of church and state, and promoting more segregation.
LikeLike
Did everyone hear how Randi Weingarten wants to “work” with Betsy Devos? No surprise give Randi’s joint press conference with ex-Michigan govenor John Engler on “holding the course on Common Core” that occured a couple of years ago.
https://newrepublic.com/article/140733/one-teachers-union-talking-betsy-devos-one-isnt-right
LikeLike