John Thompson is a historian and teacher in Oklahoma:
Oklahoma School Choice Week: The “Red Pill” Targets a Red State
The OK School Choice Summit featured Sen. Mark Loveless who, in part, promotes charters and vouchers as a means of spreading chaos in public school systems. His donor, Betsy DeVos’ the American Federation for Children, was also well represented. DeVos sees school choice as a path to “greater Kingdom gain.”
School choice: Sen. Loveless advances ‘factually incorrect’ ideology
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/betsy-devos-education-trump-religion-232150
There had been about 20 anti-corporate reform protesters at the summit, so even though I had registered for the event, I was apparently supposed to be denied entry. By the time I arrived, the police outnumbered the protesters. As some protesters chatted amiably with the summit volunteers, I schmoozed with some pro-reform political leaders who let me walk in with them.
School Choice Summit features firebrand speaker, draws protests
At the time, I didn’t realize that we who opposed the expansion of charters and vouchers could not be tolerated because we had supposedly swallowed the “blue pill,” and that made us irredeemable.
Ordinarily I get along with conservative Christians by not questioning the religious beliefs of people who support people like DeVos, who see charters and vouchers as a means to “advance God’s Kingdom.” That is one reason why I was completely unprepared for what I’d see when Dr. Steve Perry gave the summit’s keynote address.
Okay, I know I’ve failed to fully grapple with the hate that drives many corporate reform supporters, as well as Trumpism as a whole. I assumed that the summit organizers probably knew how Perry became famous by condemning unions as “cockroaches.” But, surely the audience wasn’t conversant with the research of former Connecticut Deputy House Majority Leader, Jonathan Pelto, and they didn’t know that Perry’s charter school would sentence “even the youngest students in the building, to sit at the cafeteria’s ‘Table of Shame.’”
I’ve long known a lot of the charter supporters in the audience, and I didn’t think they would approve of his desire to:
Drag sorry principals and teachers out into the street. Kick open the doors in our communities and collar lazy parents. Line ‘em all up on Main Street, snatch their pants down and show the entire world the ass that they have given our kids to kiss.
Neither would the audience know that by 2014 that Perry had called Diane Ravitch a racist in at least 49 tweets.
http://jonathanpelto.com/2014/03/11/crazy-sht-capital-prep-steve-perry-said/
I sat down next to an old friend who supports charters and vouchers, and we shook hands. Perry immediately started yelling into the microphone, telling the audience that they should have no contact with people (like me) who oppose charter and voucher expansion. Perry said that opponents of Oklahoma City’s KIPP expansion are racists. He said that people (like me) who have Obama bumper stickers but oppose charter and voucher expansion are as bad as the worst racists in American history. Perry said that that public school supporters “designed” schools to fail, and to maintain Jim Crow and drive the school to prison pipeline.
Perry said virtually nothing about actual schools. At first, I assumed that Perry avoided real education issues because his fictional narrative about founding Capital Preparatory Magnet School had been debunked so thoroughly. After all, Perry’s charter has “fewer students who qualify for Free Lunch, fewer kids with disabilities, and fewer kids who are ELL than neighboring high schools in Hartford.” The charter has high attrition rates and teacher turnover. The reliable Rutgers University scholar, Mark Weber, shows how Perry’s charter had “lower increases in student performance in comparison to comparable schools.”
http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2013/05/dr-steve-perry-final-debunk.html
But Perry explained that we are in The Matrix. Choice supporters had supposedly taken the “red pill.” Only they live in the “real world;” presumably that justifies any tactic necessary to defeat those of us who are deluded because we took the “blue pill.”
To say the least, the event was frightening. The largely white crowd loudly cheered Perry’s union-bashing and they clearly enjoyed being characterized as civil rights crusaders attacking Obama-lovers whose real goal is defending an education system which was designed to perpetuate Jim Crow.
Afterwards, I implored pro-charter friends in the crowd, asking them to renounce Perry’s hate speech. He had repeatedly said that people like me are as bad as the worst racists in American history. Do you approve of that?
One true believer in charters replied that Perry charged him up in order to better battle for choice. Another acknowledged the hateful side of the diatribe but said that I wasn’t hearing Perry’s thoughtful words. One kept replying that Perry was saying that poor children of color were being damaged by choice opponents, but he wasn’t saying we did that intentionally. He finally acknowledged that Perry was saying that the damage that people like me did to kids is by design, and he was wrong to attack us in this manner. None agreed to publicly distance themselves from Perry.
But that is not what scared me so much. Of course I’ve seen videos of demagogues firing up audiences. As a kid too young to understand, I’d witnessed John Birch Society and George Wallace rallies. But, as an adult, I’d never seen anything as frightening as the way Perry worked the crowd.
I still deny that rank-in-file charter supporters are bad people. No longer can I deny, however, that many of them crave the overall message that Perry delivers. The crowd wouldn’t have been so open to the claim that we who disagree with them are evil if they weren’t hungry for a fight. For reasons that must be bigger than education reform, many of them must be ready for battle, and they crave the message that they are righteous crusaders and their enemies deserve to be destroyed.

“It is becoming increasingly difficult for the other side to make the lies stick for much longer.” Later he explained that “the other side” was the established public education system and the “teachers’ unions” who he perceived to be more concerned for their own status than the future of the students.
His statements showed enthusiasm for the work, but also the frustration with the heavy traditional school model in place now. He believes the traditional school model had a clear intent of maintaining differences and a stratified society.”
I don’t know how these folks can continue to claim they aren’t opposed to public schools.
I mean, really. OF COURSE they’re opposed to public schools! They say it constantly!
Do they think it’s a secret? Perry gives speeches all over the country. His whole speech is about attacking public schools. This is his full time job. There’s an entire cottage industry of ed reform speakers who attack public schools for a living. They’re professional critics of public schools. The worst part is, half the time they’re paid with public funds! The public are paying people to fly in and attack their schools. We support them.
LikeLike
“Perry said virtually nothing about actual schools. ”
Because it isn’t about schools.
Betsy DeVos is apparently unable to name a single public school she approves of, and they’re backing her for Secretary of Education. She omits public schools from her presentation. That’s how much she values our schools. They’re unworthy even of mention in a canned, prepared speech.
LikeLike
I’m trying to picture DeVos doing her job. 90% of kids attend public schools. Is it her intention to take that job and oppose their schools?
Why would we invite this person in or take advice from her? Imagine a Sec of Ed who had spent 30 years opposing charter schools. That person would NEVER be hired. Yet public schools are just expected to not only put up with this but pay the salaries of people who work against them?
It’s really nuts. The ed reform “movement” has completely lost the plot. They can’t be “public education advocates” and work against 90% of schools. That’s impossible.
LikeLike
You will be surprised by the invitations she gets to speak to national school boards, national administrators, national public education groups of all kind, who will welcome her as she comes to tell them how wonderful it is to give up–relinquish.
LikeLike
This post is disturbing. Some of the evangelicals are deeply troubled and dangerous. Dr. Perry is another demagogue. His rhetoric sounds like the type of extremist rant that launched the original crusades, and we know how they turned out. Maybe the polluted ground water from too much fracking in Oklahoma has gone to their heads. I am a dedicated “cockroach.” The one thing we know is how to survive, and some scientists have predicted that we roaches may be one of the only things that may survive a nuclear holocaust. Let’s hope we don’t have to test this theory under Trump.
LikeLike
.@MichaelPetrilli: Opposition to @BetsyDeVos “is mostly about Democratic Party politics, and that’s union politics”
Tens of thousands of ordinary people call their representatives to oppose a Secretary of Education who is anti-public schools and the ed reform “movement” brushes them all off and attributes it to labor unions.
They cannot imagine that there are people who actually support a public school. Refuse to believe it, even when it’s right in front of them.
This is a bigger problem than DeVos. It’s not even that public schools are excluded from debates ABOUT public schools in DC.
Ed reformers refuse to believe public school supporters EXIST. Of course we’re never heard from. They don’t believe there are any!
LikeLike
Chiara,
Mike Petrilli was #nevertrump.
That was then.
LikeLike
DeVos used inaccurate graduation #’s for online charters in Senate questionnaire. Remember that when the US Department of Ed comes peddling online learning.
There is no federal law that says public schools have to swallow everything these folks sell. If she’s pushing for-profit ed tech product into public schools she should be treated like any other salesperson. Let the buyer beware. Don’t accept a US Department of Education endorsement as anything other than advertising.
Public schools can do a lot to limit the damage. First on the list should be extreme skepticism of anything they peddle.
LikeLike
Not only are we trying to fight of charters and vouchers, we have to work against corporate commodification of our schools. Pearson and all the usual suspects are buying access to public schools to enable the adoption of “hybrid or blended” learning, and ultimately “personalized” learning. None of this is supported by research; it is supported by Gates, Pearson and other tech companies that are trying to infiltrate our states to influence sales of these products to public schools. http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2017/01/new-video-on-hybridblended-learning.html
LikeLike
As a resident of DC and a passionate supporter of public schools, (as a parent and grandparent , not an educator) I am terrified that DeVos will take over our entire system and make it totally charter and voucher. We are disenfranchised, with Congress able to overturn any law or policy of our locally elected government. The Republican House has already confirmed that they feel it is their duty to correct our “wrong” decisions – e.g., medical marijuana, decriminalization of marijuana, death with dignity, etc.They years ago forced a voucher program on us that we didn’t want and that research has shown results in poorer progress than for children who remain in public schools. We are going to need support from this on-line community when DeVos comes for us.
LikeLike
I don’t even know where to begin with this.
I’ve been DONE with Dr. Steve Perry for some time now. His comments about taking teachers, administrators, and parents out into the street conjured up images of slave auctions and lynch mobs (at least in my mind). I’m sure THAT statement alone got some of the good ol’ boy Okies goin’.
Without a doubt, public schools, especially those serving black, brown, urban and poor children- need to start doing some things differently. We do indeed have problems with these kids failing, the segregation of our schools, and the school to prison pipeline. But I don’t believe that charters and vochers are the answer. Completely dismantling public education is not the answer. Destroying teachers unions is not the answer. More testing is not the answer. Deprofessionalizing teaching is not the answer.
Dr. Steve Perry has attended events sponsored by Comedian and Radio Personality Steve Harvey in the past. If the name Steve Harvey sounds somewhat familiar, it’s because HE recently had a meeting with the President Don. I guess to talk about issues that would be relevant to the black community. (I absolutely convey ALL of my concerns to comedians on the radio.)
So, I see where this is going.
I prefer Dr. ANDRE Perry to Dr. Steve Perry who said, “Black people do not need choice; black people need power.” Brown people need power, poor people need power, and under THIS administration ALL people need power.
LikeLike
Diane and all: Bill Gates was on Charlie Rose last weekend with Warren Buffett. They talked about many issues; but what Gates said about movements in education was a bit telling? Two things:
First, he talked about “public charter schools” as the connection between public and charter were a given.
Second, and far more interesting to me was that Charlie Rose asked him about why the charter “movement” wasn’t accepted by many. Gates replied that it was because people don’t like change. Of course, his idea of change is coupled with “innovation” which, of course has to do with the development of what Neil Postman calls a technocracy. And who would argue against innovation? But it was a really brief exchange that blended in with an eclectic conversation, as conversations often go on Charlie Rose–always interesting, but rarely well-defined.
If that’s really what Gates’ thinks, then he’s not listening and getting the other side of the argument at all. On the other hand, we don’t know what he really thinks. In any case, Gates does a lot of good things, has a good “brand,” and the charter/voucher movements are slick and really well-funded.
LikeLike
Correction Neil Postman’s book is called “Technopoly.”
LikeLike
Gates has never listened to anybody! He invested the CCSS and ignored all the problems. He promoted VAM for teachers and ignored its lack of validity. He is arrogant and believes all his ideas are “innovative.” He is like all the other privateers looking to cash in on public money. Technology is not necessarily “innovative.” Lots of it is outdated reductionist, behaviorist thinking designed to make money for Gates, but he markets it as “innovation.”
LikeLike
retired teacher: I just thought everyone here would like to know that we all really have no cause to complain but are really just opposed to change. (sarcasm alert)
LikeLike