Archives for the month of: January, 2017

Mother Crusader, aka Darcie Cimarusti of New Jersey, knows how to read federal campaign contribution reports. She knows that it has been widely reported that four members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee have received DeVos money. After digging, she shows that EIGHT members of the committee have received DeVos campaign contributions. They should recuse themselves to avoid the appearance of pay-to-play.

 

http://mothercrusader.blogspot.com/2017/01/demand-that-senators-who-have-received.html

Lindsay Wagner has been covering education issues in North Carolina for several years. Now that the state has vouchers, politicians say that parents will surely make the right choices. But since voucher schools are exempt from providing the same information as public schools, how can parents make informed choices? 

Humor, music, and art will see us through the next four years.

 

Steven Singer discovered a site where you can write a fake Trump tweet.

 

Try it. My overwhelming urge was to write a tweet where Trump insults me. That felt good, pretending that he cares what I or any other non-billionaire thinks.

 

Do it soon or the site might disappear, if it hasn’t already.

 

 

Cory Booker has a warm relationship with Billionaire Betsy DeVos. But an ambitious Democrat can’t admit his admiration for a member of Trump’s cabinet in waiting.

 

Booker loves school choice. He made a mess of Newark with DeVos’s ideas. He was trying to turn it into Detroit and things didn’t go well. Journalist Dale Russakoff wrote a book, “The Prize,” about Booker’s ideological folly.

 

What’s a guy to do? Follow his heart and vote for her? Or follow his head and stay in good standing with his party?

Money, money, money!

 

Watch who gets richer over the next four years. It will be a bacchanalia that make the Robber Barons look like pikers.

 

The New York Times reports that Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner is pursuing a big deal with Chinese investors. 

 

On the night of Nov. 16, a group of executives gathered in a private dining room of the restaurant La Chine at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in Midtown Manhattan. The table was laden with Chinese delicacies and $2,100 bottles of Château Lafite Rothschild. At one end sat Wu Xiaohui, the chairman of the Waldorf’s owner, Anbang Insurance Group, a Chinese financial behemoth with estimated assets of $285 billion and an ownership structure shrouded in mystery. Close by sat Jared Kushner, a major New York real estate investor whose father-in-law, Donald J. Trump, had just been elected president of the United States.

 

It was a mutually auspicious moment.

 

Mr. Wu and Mr. Kushner — who is married to Mr. Trump’s daughter Ivanka and is one of his closest advisers — were nearing agreement on a joint venture in Manhattan: the redevelopment of 666 Fifth Avenue, the fading crown jewel of the Kushner family real-estate empire. Anbang, which has close ties to the Chinese state, has seen its aggressive efforts to buy up hotels in the United States slowed amid concerns raised by Obama administration officials who review foreign investments for national security risk.

 

Now, according to two people with knowledge of the get-together, Mr. Wu toasted Mr. Trump and declared his desire to meet the president-elect, whose ascension, he was sure, would be good for global business.

 

Since the election, intense scrutiny has been trained on Mr. Trump’s company and the potential conflicts of interest he will face. But with Mr. Kushner laying the groundwork for his own White House role, the meeting at the Waldorf shines a light on his family’s multibillion-dollar business, Kushner Companies, and on the ethical thicket he would have to navigate while advising his father-in-law on policy that could affect his bottom line.

 

Gosh, don’t you wish you were invited to that splendid dinner? I have never tasted Chateau Lafitte Rothschild. Only $2,100 for a bottle? Wow!

 

No worries about funding schools or nutrition or health care. Just greed.

The Washington Post reports that Betsy DeVos has been very generous with several of the senators who will vote on her nomination.

 

Emma Brown writes:

 

Betsy DeVos, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for education secretary, is not just a prospective Cabinet member seeking confirmation from the U.S. Senate.

 

She is also a billionaire Republican donor whose family’s donations have funded the campaigns of many of the senators now tasked with voting on her nomination, including members of the committee overseeing her confirmation hearing on Jan. 11.

 

During the 2014 and 2016 election cycles, DeVos and her relatives gave at least $818,000 to 20 current Republican senators, including more than $250,000 to five members of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP), according to a Washington Post analysis of Federal Election Commission records.

 

DeVos personally made a relatively small percentage of those donations: at least $31,400 to committee members and $96,000 to all senators. But her giving appears to have been coordinated with her family: In most cases, senators received donations from more than a half-dozen DeVos family members, including her husband, his parents and his siblings, on the same day.

 

To money-in-politics watchdogs, the DeVos family’s contributions create a conflict of interest for senators now charged with judging Betsy DeVos’s fitness to helm the federal education department.

 

“She’s acknowledged that her family gives, and gives a lot, because it’s aiming to buy influence,” said Robert Weissman of Public Citizen, who said the scale of the DeVos family’s political donations is unusual for a prospective Cabinet member. “Against that backdrop, how are the senators supposed to evaluate her nomination in an unbiased way? They can’t.”

 

Trump transition officials and DeVos supporters say that members of the DeVos family have been exercising their right to support candidates who share their political views, and that it’s nothing new for senators – including Democrats – to vote on the confirmation of wealthy nominees who make donations to them.

 

On Friday, two groups that advocate for reform of money in politics – End Citizens United and Every Voice – called on senators who have received donations from DeVos to recuse themselves from voting on her confirmation. Absent those recusals, “it is impossible to be sure she will receive the scrutiny this important position deserves,” said David Donnelly, of Every Voice.

 

This is the DeVos way: Find out the price tag for compliance and buy it. That’s what they did in Michigan, where DeVos and her husband lost in 2000 on a voucher referendum, lost in 2006 when Dick DeVos ran for Governor and lost, then decided it was easier to buy the legislature.

 

 

Republicans have decided that they are prepared to spend billions to build the “big, beautiful wall” that Trump promised on the southern border.

 

When it comes to investing in our children and our future, there is no more money.

 

But when Trump promised to build a wall across the southern border, which he said Mexico would pay for, well, the Republicans must follow through. They may bankrupt other government programs, but they didn’t care about any of those programs anyway.

 

There is no reliable price tag on building a border wall, but Trump has estimated the cost at $8 billion. Recent congressional legislation pegged the number at $10 billion, and construction experts say it could be more than double that….

 

Experts at the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimate that Trump’s tax proposals alone could add as much as $7.2 trillion to the deficit in the coming decade. Even-more-conservative estimates, such as those produced by the right-leaning Tax Foundation, concluded that Trump’s tax proposals would create at least a $4.4 trillion budget hole in the same time frame.

 

The costs of rolling back the ACA are harder to predict. Repealing the entire law would increase deficits by more than $350 billion over a decade, according to a 2015 report from the Congressional Budget Office, which serves as an independent scorekeeper….

 

During the campaign, the wall was Trump’s signature promise and a raucous rallying cry among his supporters at his large rallies. Trump repeatedly said that Mexico would have to pay for the giant structure, but he also signaled that U.S. taxpayers would be reimbursed for it after its construction.

 

In a Friday-morning tweet, Trump said: “The dishonest media does not report that any money spent on building the Great Wall (for sake of speed), will be paid back by Mexico later!”

 

Republicans are discussing reviving a 2006 law — supported by the GOP and Democrats alike — that gave them authority to construct partial fencing along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexican border.

 

The 2006 Secure Fence Act mandated 700 miles of “reinforced fencing” along the southern border as well as enhanced surveillance systems. The full complement of barriers was never completed, and GOP lawmakers think the law provides sufficient authority to proceed with additional construction.

 

Is there a cure for stupidity?

Angie Sullivan, second-grade teachers in Clark County, Nevada, wrote the following missive to the state’s legislators and journalists:

 

 

Behold! The Nevada Plan!

 

http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/01/06/report-nevada-schools-place-last-in-nation/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

 

The national grade and the grades for individual states are based on three custom Research Center indices that look at the role of education in promoting an individual’s chance for success over the course of a lifetime; overall school spending and equity in funding across districts; and academic performance, including changes over time and poverty-based gaps.

 

http://mobile.edweek.org/c.jsp?cid=25919951&rssid=25919141&item=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.edweek.org%2Fv1%2Few%2F%3Fuuid%3D8F26560C-C7AB-11E6-942D-3099B3743667&intc=EW-QC17-TOC

 

It is not enough to pronounce Nevada failing.

 

Let us be frank about WHY!

 

Nevada’s education system is failing because 50% of the DSA is diverted to primarily white rural schools. This gives 25% of Nevada’s children adequate funding for public education.

 

Many rural areas also benefit from mining proceeds which cannot be accessed by the south.

 

Oddly enough a large percentage 25% of the lowest performing list are rural schools.

 

75% of Nevada’s children are in the south. They must make do with 50% of the DSA. The south serves more poor, disenfranchised, and language learners than any other area.

 

Only 1% of CCSD’s schools are on the lowest performing list. CCSD actually does better than the rest of the state when comparing the overall numbers with significantly less funding. The problem is that 1% in Vegas is a huge number. And it is the poor and already suffering who have no schools without teachers.

 

The point is: CCSD is actually very effective with 99% of it’s kids. Better than the rest of the state with significantly less money.

 

Southern caucus – your children need you to advocate and fight for them.

 

The answer will never be charters or forcing a Vegas public schools from the middle of a “list” to be a charter. Especially when the ASD states it will not take over a rural school or a charter even though they compose 50% of the lowest performing list. That does not solve the main funding issues. It keeps us last.

 

If Nevada wants to get off these lists: They need to solve the real problem.

 

Please write your legislator.

 

http://mapserve1.leg.state.nv.us/whoRU/

 

Ask them to fight for Vegas kids.

 

We cannot continue to rank last because we have built systems which favor some at the detriment to others.

 

This funding issue and this system developed in the 1960s has got to go.

 

Southern Caucus: You have a common cause. Please put your differences aside and work together for Vegas kids. We applaud your efforts last session under Republican leadership. We are expecting some leadership this session from the Democrats.

 

O God hear the words of my mouth. Let our representatives work on issues which will help us make progress. Hold Vegas children in Your Hand.

Democrats in the Senate say that Betsy Devos’ hearing should be delayed because she has not completed her financial disclosure, which is required of all Cabinet appointments. Presumably, she has an accountant.

 

Democrats are pushing to delay Betsy DeVos’ confirmation hearing next Wednesdaybecause the billionaire philanthropist’s finances haven’t yet been cleared by ethics officials, nor has she signed an agreement addressing possible conflicts of interest.

 

Sen. Patty Murray, the committee’s top Democrat, says that she’s concerned about the “extensive financial entanglements and potential conflicts of interest” of President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for Education secretary.

 

An aide to Murray told POLITICO that “it would certainly be concerning if nominees break from standard practice and don’t submit their ethics paperwork in advance of a hearing.”

 

Although DeVos submitted her financial disclosures to the Office of Government Ethics on Dec. 12, she is still in discussions to finalize the paperwork and sign an agreement addressing possible conflicts of interest, according to her spokesman, Ed Patru.

 

The ethics office, in coordination with the Education Department, is responsible for identifying any conflicts of interest that DeVos might have and striking an agreement with her to recuse herself from certain decisions to avoid future conflicts.

 

Senate HELP Chairman Lamar Alexander indicated he plans to move ahead with the Jan. 11hearing, regardless of whether the paperwork is finalized. Committee rules don’t require the ethics office to clear a nominee’s finances and sign an ethics agreement before a hearing. But Alexander will require those things before holding a committee vote, an aide said.

 

“Our committee is going to follow the Golden Rule and use the same procedures for these nominees that we did in 2001 for President Bush’s nominees and in 2009 for President Obama’s nominees,” Alexander said in a statement to POLITICO.

 

Democrats dispute that the committee is following the same practice, saying the ethics review of President Barack Obama’s Cabinet nominees was generally completed prior to any confirmation hearing. They argue that government ethics officials’ vetting of DeVos should be completed before her hearing.

 

“Confirmation hearings shouldn’t be held until senators have essential and required information on a nominee,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a member of the committee. “Required financial disclosures and a nominee’s ethics letter go to their basic fitness to serve.”

 

“The Trump administration may be conducting a slipshod vetting process, but the United States Senate should not,” Whitehouse added. “The majority’s conduct ramming and stacking these hearings for unvetted nominees is unprecedented.”

 

Four members of the Senate HELP committee have received campaign contributions from Billionaire Betsy. They should recuse themselves.

 

Matt Wyatt is president of the school board in Elizabethtown, Kentucky. He knows that the new Republican governor and Republican legislature are eager to launch charter schools, using the same tired promises that have failed everywhere else.

 

No, charters will not close achievement gaps. No, charters will not produce innovation. No, charters are not public schools.

 

Charters will drain resources from public schools, waste money, and close if they choose in mid-year.

 

Invest in public schools, says Wyatt.

 

When the Eluzabethtown school board declared their opposition, the free market ideologues at the libertarian Bluegrass Institute attacked the board for its devotion to public schools. It produced data showing that there is an achievement gap in Elizabethtown. But it did not produce data showing that charter schools had closed the achievement gap anywhere: not in Detroit, not in DC, not in Milwaukee, not in New Orleans. Nowhere.

 

Ignore them, do what’s right for your children and your community.