Kristen Rizga, a perceptive reporter for Mother Jones, has been writing about education for several years. Her book Mission High was an excellent portrait of a San Francisco that was labeled as “failing” even though its students were not failing and its staff was dedicated.
In this fascinating article, she describes the sheltered life of billionaire heiress Betsy DeVos and the unusual community that nurtured her world-view. She also reviews the charitable donations made by the foundations of Betsy Devos and her husband, as well as of her parents’ foundation, where Betsy was an officer. (She said in the Senate hearing that she was not involved in her mother’s foundation, but did not acknowledge that she was an officer of the foundation for many years until recently.)
Although the DeVoses have rarely commented on how their religious views affect their philanthropy and political activism, their spending speaks volumes. Mother Jones has analyzed the Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation’s tax filings from 2000 to 2014, as well as the 2001 to 2014 filings from her parents’ charitable organization, the Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation. (Betsy DeVos was vice president of the Prince Foundation during those years.) During that period, the DeVoses spent nearly $100 million in philanthropic giving, and the Princes spent $70 million. While Dick and Betsy DeVos have donated large amounts to hospitals, health research, and arts organizations, these records show an overwhelming emphasis on funding Christian schools and evangelical missions and conservative, free-market think tanks, like the Acton Institute and the Mackinac Center, that want to shrink the public sector in every sphere, including education.
The couple’s philanthropic record makes clear that they view choice and competition as the best mechanism to improve America’s education system. Overall, their foundation gave $5.2 million from 1999 to 2014 to charter schools, which are funded by taxpayers but governed by appointed boards and often run by private companies with varying degrees of oversight by state institutions. Some $4.8 million went to a small school they founded, the West Michigan Aviation Academy. (Flying is one of Dick’s passions.) Their next biggest beneficiary, New Urban Learning—an operator that dropped its charter after teachers began to unionize—received $350,000; big-name charter operators Success Academy and KIPP Foundation received $25,000 and $500, respectively.
Meanwhile, when it comes to traditional public schools run by the districts and accountable to democratically elected school boards—the ones that 86 percent of American students attend—the DeVoses were far less generous: Less than 1 percent of their funding ($59,750) went to support these schools. (To be fair, few philanthropists donate directly to underfunded public school districts.)
But the DeVoses’ foundation giving shows the couple’s clearest preference is for Christian private schools. In a 2013 interview with Philanthropy Magazine, Betsy DeVos said that while charters are “a very valid choice,” they “take a while to start up and get operating. Meanwhile, there are very good non-public schools, hanging on by a shoestring, that can begin taking students today.” From 1999 to 2014, the Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation gave out $2,396,525 to the Grand Rapids Christian High School Association, $652,000 to the Ada Christian School, and $458,000 to Holland Christian Schools. All told, their foundation contributed $8.6 million to private religious schools—a reflection of the DeVoses’ lifelong dedication to building “God’s Kingdom” through education…..
And here is one of their favorite causes: the fight against same-sex marriage (which DeVos denied before the Senate committee):
• Focus on the Family: Both the DeVoses and the Princes have been key supporters of Focus on the Family, which was founded by the influential evangelical leader James Dobson. In a 2002 radio broadcast, Dobson called on parents in some states to pull their kids out of public schools, calling the curriculum “godless and immoral” and suggesting that Christian teachers should also leave public schools: “I couldn’t be in an organization that’s supporting that kind of anti-Christian nonsense.” Dobson also has distributed a set of history lessons that argue that “separating Christianity from government is virtually impossible and would result in unthinkable damage to the nation and its people.” The Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation gave $275,000 to Focus on the Family from 1999 to 2001 but hasn’t donated since; it gave an additional $35,760 to the group’s Michigan and DC affiliates from 2001 to 2010. The Prince Foundation donated $5.2 million to Focus on the Family and $275,000 to its Michigan affiliate from 2001 to 2014. (It also gave $6.1 million to the Family Research Council, which has fought against same-sex marriage and anti-bullying programs—and is listed as an “anti-LGBT hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The FRC used to be a division of Focus on the Family before it became an independent nonprofit, with Dobson serving on its board, in 1992.)
And here is the key to DeVos’s love for charter schools: they are the gateway to opening the door to school choice that includes religious schools (her true passion). Once the public is accustomed to the idea that school choice is a “right,” then everything is possible, even direct public funding of religious schools:
Which brings us back to Michigan, “school choice,” charter schools, and vouchers. Betsy DeVos has spent at least two decades pushing vouchers—i.e., public funding to pay for private and religious schools—to the center of the Republican Party’s education agenda, thanks in large part to the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a Michigan-based think tank.
In the mid-’90s, Mackinac leadership suggested a long-term strategy on how to make the unpopular voucher policies more palatable for mainstream America. Its then-senior vice president, Joseph Overton, developed what became known as the Overton Window, a theory of how a policy initially considered extreme might over time be normalized through gradual shifts in public opinion. Education policies were placed on a liberal-conservative continuum, with the far left representing “Compulsory indoctrination in government schools” and the far right, “No government schools.”
Charter schools became the main tool of voucher advocates to introduce school choice to public school supporters, with the aim to nudge public opinion closer to supporting tax credits to pay for private schools. Since about 80 percent of American students outside the public system attend religious schools, “universal choice”—or allowing taxpayer money to follow individual students to any private or public school—could eventually mean financing thousands of Christian schools.
Nurtured her world-view?
For our purposes, she is a hard-core, ed-reformer and deep privatizer. End.
That world view has deep precedent in our history and culture.
Who nurtured the world-view of the robber-barons?
Otherwise, she’s just a run-of-the-mill American religio-maniac, cultivated in the religio-maniac sub-culture that has become institutionalized in our society in the last half-century….in the absence of the counterbalance of sustained progressive criticism of such things.
We are treating DeVos like she is super-special and we are focusing on her waaaaaay too much. Our focus, anger, furor, etc. should be focused on ALL privatizers and ed reformers, no matter their party or depth of insanity (all really deep).
DeVos in no way began any of her ideas. She in no way is original in any of her thinking. She in no way represents anything new.
Can the ed reform “movement” say that they presented this agenda to the public, though?
Because I don’t think they did. When this started it was sold as “improving public education”. Any critics who said this was leading to privatization and was clearly an ideological and political agenda were told they were irrational and shut down.
But that’s where are. That’s exactly where it DID lead. Everything that critics warned about has come to pass.
In addition to the obvious, DeVos education implications… when a mega evangelical church becomes the community’ school system, with the implied status as social center, the other denominational Christian congregations, in the area, won’t survive (a clear trend, already). And, the congregants of minority faiths, will be weakened by their own isolation.
Yes. The mega-churches are not just social and centers for day-care and schooling K-12. In my community one is a multi-site land-landowner (defunct big-box stores, malls) with a lot of token social services operated by volunteers (drug and rehab) who have a mission but no qualifications. One mega-church has an “innovation incubator” for startups. This church is a funnel for money from venture capitalists.
I wrote to several journalists, in hopes a reporter would cover the source of the mega churches’ seed money (to no avail). One pastor, in my area, explained to me, the local source of start-up money, was credit card authorization equipment/process, that is used when consumers buy from retailers. I don’t know if he was blowing smoke or not.
DeVos thinks ALL that $$$$$ is HERS, and it is NOT her $$$$$. She lives in a bubble and is totally self-involved. She doesn’t think that there are others who do NOT share her opinions, which, of course, are wrong. DeVos is just a rich princess without a CLUE. She’s a disaster.
Yvonne,
Important point to remember. Billionaires live in bubbles. They do not have the same concerns as other people. They never wonder about the food, the laundry, who walks the dog, how and when to do things, or how to pay for those things. Everything is done for them.
I’m going with that too.
Good point. Linda writes about the conflict with other denominational congregations when a “mega evangelical church becomes the community’s school system, with the implied status as social center.”
That’s one of the central protections that having a secular culture affords–we can all attend our own churches freely but, explicitly in our Constitution, no one religious group or institution is afforded government endorsement or support. But I doubt DeVos understands the value of this essential foundation of a secular culture and the peace it brings to both religious and civic life–on the contrary.
But I doubt DeVos understands the value of this essential foundation of a secular culture and the peace it brings to both religious and civic life–on the contrary.
I agree, but if you shun secular culture and other religions as art of your faith, or move beyond shunning into overdrive–making secular culture and other religions your enemies you have no peace or basis for civic life.
Laura H. Chapman: Yes–that’s why secular culture and a supporting constitutional democracy is so important. Jefferson read history–often in its original language. He probably knew that, in the heart of every religious zealot, lives a theocratic totalitarian. Though some in our religious communities demonize “secular-ism,” secularity is why we and they don’t have to dodge bullets to attend the church of their choice.
Again, like many very good people who are also religious zealots, Betsy DeVos probably has a clue about the implications of her not-so-secret intentions.
Conservative ed. leaders posted a list of recommended candidates for U.S. Secretary of Education. Among others, the list included (1) DeVos (2) a former president of an evangelical university, who was also an educational consultant to the Gates Foundation and, (3) a Fellow, from a Gates-funded institute .
The intertwining of evangelicals/plutocrats/conservative politicians is frightening. The PR messages of patriotism, e.g., the Thunderclap message planned for tomorrow, “If you hate Trump more than love America, you never loved America”, when coupled with characteristics of Nazi Germany in the lead up to WWII (a) increased privatization, (b) condemnation of “degenerate art ” (c) demographic superiority (currently reflected in calls for a two-tier education) should worry all Americans, particularly those who love and value the principles upon which the nation was founded. Those who have sacrificed so much for the nation, unlike the richest 0.1%, self-serving “philanthropists”, deserve to have all of us fight for what public schools represent.
The below from the article’s quote from J. Overton is a horribly false characterization of public schools: I’m not surprised. See my emphases.
“Joseph Overton, developed what became known as the Overton Window, a theory of how a policy initially considered extreme might over time be normalized through gradual shifts in public opinion. Education policies were placed on a liberal-conservative continuum, with the far left representing ‘Compulsory indoctrination in government schools’ and the far right, ‘No government schools.'”
Actually, I think you need to understand the Dunning-Kruger Effect (aka Duncan Kludger Effect renamed for Arne Duncan)
Diane, I’ve been following you for a long time — I’m a former classroom teacher, currently working on a project in arts based education — and I am increasingly wanting to somehow repost some of your articles — on facebook, or somewhere. Have you ever thought of attaching that kind of capability to your blog? Thanks,
Linda Townsend West
Linda Townsend West lindatw@u.washington.edu (206) 387-3262
>
Found it!
>