Washington Post writer Catherine Rampell predicts that Trump’s choice of hardline right winger Mick Mulvaney for director of the Office of Management and Budget is the worst appointment yet. He is an ideologue who doesn’t see any reason for federal spending. She believes that Mulvany might set off a global economic crisis. I can tell you from my own brief experience in the federal government that OMB is the ultimate decider on every spending decision.
She writes:
Over the weekend, President-elect Donald Trump tapped Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) to be his director of the Office of Management and Budget. This Cabinet-level post is responsible for producing the federal budget, overseeing and evaluating executive branch agencies and otherwise advising the president on fiscal matters. It’s a position with tremendous, far-reaching power, even if the public doesn’t pay much attention to it.
Which is why it’s so concerning that Trump chose Mulvaney, who seems poised to help Trump ignite another worldwide financial crisis.
Mulvaney was first elected to Congress in 2010 as part of the anti-government, tea party wave. A founding member of the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, he is among Congress’s most committed fiscal hawks. He has repeatedly voted against his own party’s budget proposals because they were insufficiently conservative.
Mulvaney, like Trump’s other cabinet picks, is inexperienced and unqualified. His strong point of view is at odds with Trump’s promises.
The world must be watching in amazement as our inexperienced and ignorant new president fills out his team with equally inexperienced and ignorant cabinet leaders.
I think that most of these choices were made by Mike Pence, who previously served in Congress. Trump very likely never heard of any of the people he has chosen; they are not the type likely to dine at the 21 Club in Manhattan or to hobnob with the celebrity culture. Pence knows them through his evangelical, hard-right connections.

Nothing surprises me with these clowns. I don’t think Trump is a religious zealot but that Pence is beyond dangerous with his BS religious crap.
LikeLike
And I’d bet two bits to a dollar that it is Pence who is selecting all of these folks. Just as the Dickster Cheney was in charge in Georgie the Least’s presidency, it appears that Mike Priestly Pence will be in charge of THETrumpster’s presidency.
LikeLike
I know this is logically impossible but all of Trump’s appointments are the worst. Even that despicable toad, Larry Kudlow is in the woodpile advising Trump on matters economic. As regards Mulvaney, from talkingpointsmemo: Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC), Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Office of Management and Budget, spoke in July to the John Birch Society, the ultra conservative group known in recent years for pushing conspiracy theories, Mother Jones reported on Monday.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mick-mulvaney-john-birch-society
We are guaranteed to have another great depression with this load of ghoulish deplorables.
LikeLike
“let’s just note how consistently wrong Kudlow has been over the years. He denied the existence of a housing bubble, even after it collapsed. He touted the “Bush boom” and boasted that there wouldn’t be any recession in December 2007—the month the recession began. Once the downturn was undeniable, Kudlow dismissed it, said it would be mild, predicted the bottom over and over as the economy continued to sink. He recommended buying stocks in September 2008, the month the market lost a substantial amount of its value. Baghdad Bob looks at this guy and thinks he might need to get his facts straight. “
LikeLike
That’s kind of like asking if you would rather die by poisoning, beheading, impalement or hanging. Mulvaney’s nomination pretty much checks all of the boxes. As a leader of the House (opposite of) Freedom (cabal) Caucus, he is a true blue American fascist. He brings both a stunning ignorance and an overly simplistic view of the world with him. Prepare for across-the-board funding cuts–except the military, of course. The perverse brilliance of Trump’s choices is that he is creating so many enemies in so many areas, it will be difficult to coalesce meaningful opposition. Mulvaney will be the ringleader on many of those fronts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A friend on mine reminded me today that the Trump effect will creep into issues and areas we may not notice until it is too late. What will it mean, for example, for the national endowments of the Arts and Humanities? Our culture in general? Will Trump and his minions be our equivalent of ISIL and the Taliban when it comes to the arts?
http://artwatchinternational.org/articles/donalds-demolition
LikeLike
GregB
Trump is not the problem the Democrats are the problem . Will they fight him every inch of the way or will they always have just enough votes to cross over and prevent a filibusterer. Will they turn to the Republicans with a stark warning that if they destroy the filibusterer they will “rue the day”.
Expect every bill McConnell puts up to have a poison pill in it.
The history of Fast Track trade legislation is a good example . The reason Labor, Consumer, Environmental, groups fought it so hard was that it meant that individual parts of a trade bill could not be debated and changed it put legislators in the position of voting up and down on the whole treaty. This provided cover for the worms.
“Well I hated that provision but there was so much good in the bill I had to pass it ” Wrong !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Remember how that bill was defeated twice and then there is always that one democratic vote that brakes ranks to deliver for the plutocracy.
A similar thing just happened with the 21st century cures act . I don’t know how many terrible provisions were taken out of the bill . Just not enough to get Warren and Sanders to vote for a bill that had a provision sponsored in Biden’s son’s name .
Expect an infrastructure bill that turns public roads over to private companies and eliminates prevailing wage in the construction industry. And guts public sector union jobs by maintaining those roads privately..
Expect an increase in Education spending to go to the States to be used fpor public schools or vouchers.
And just enough democrats will say “How could I turn down the increase for our Public schools we do no have vouchers in our state” Yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
As usual breaks not the things made of asbestos .
LikeLike
As usual, Trump seemed to know which way the wind was blowing– axed those arch icons in 1980 as Reagan was elected. Reagan had planned to de-fund the Nat’l Endowment for the Arts but his transition team convinced him to hold off. He ended up ‘only’ cutting its budget by 50%.
LikeLike
Sorry, hit post before adding this: http://www.coneyislandhistory.org/exhibition-center
LikeLike
Reblogged this on BLOGGYWOCKY and commented:
The appointment of Mick Mulvaney as Director of the OMB is just yet another way for the incoming administration to destroy much of the federal government. (Well, except, perhaps, for the military.)
They seem to want to dismantle everything that has protected our people, our children, our environment.
This is truly alarming, and we are going to be in for a very rough four years. I just hope that our country can recover (although I’m sure that many of the 1% are thrilled about the prospect of lower taxes and few, if any, federal regulations as they start behaving like the Robber Barons of old).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Zorba,
But many Americans don’t know what those agencies do, so they don’t care. They hear stories of waste and think, yeah, let’s get rid of them. Many of my students believe, plain and simple, that taxation is bad. Isn’t it, then, incumbent on the schools to teach what government and its bureaucracy does? Shouldn’t schools get rather detailed in explaining what the agencies are, what they cost, what they do, where there’s been reported waste, and brainstorm what would happen if the agencies disappeared? Have a classroom debate –an informed debate. But in the absence of this kind of DEEP civics education, why should be surprised if half of the country says, yeah, to Hell with government? Is there any higher priority than this kind of education? Oh wait, yeah, kids are busy mastering math and reading skills. Content will have to wait.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is your students’ conviction that ‘taxation is bad’ a result of lack of civics ed in your district, do you think?
My kids (now in their 20’s) seem to have a pretty good grasp of what taxes are about. Even tho, as musicians/ recording engrs, they have trouble putting together 40 hrs/wk of career-related PT gigs (bennies via ACA), they understand what the taxes/ FICA pmts are for & don’t complain.
It is hard for me to get a big picture: we live in a hi-RE tax/ excellent district– my bubble. I think they got a good background in Amer govt (7-12 grades thro Soc Stud), tho I doubt they learned the ins & outs of exec agencies, & I very much like your suggestion for informed debate. In fact, personally, I would like a lot more background on exec agencies than I have been able to glean thro wikipedia. It strikes me as a branch of govt which has ballooned in cost & power since the early days of the republic…
LikeLike
I meant to ask in there somewhere: or could your students’ negative attitude toward taxation be a reflection of what their parents say/ regional culture? If yes, I would certainly agree that in-depth study & debate on these matters at pubsch could help them get the tools they need to think beyond their cultural envelope.
LikeLike
For those who simply avoid history lessons, blithely deregulating with the intention of cutting any and all controls over spending and then encouraging a financial free-for-all looks and sounds a lot like years leading up to 1929…
LikeLike
Indeed, ciedie.
“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
My thought is that it’s not Trump who is making these appointments. Bannon seems to be the one in charge of making the outlandish appointments.
LikeLike
Bannon or Pence. Maybe both. Trump knows models.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Diane
Any reason I can not seem to use my regular Facebook login. Comments are not posting
LikeLike
Joel,
I have no notion of what Facebook is doing.
LikeLike
In between fits of paranoia, I notice the comment count was down on the Trump posts. For now I will sign on with Twitter
LikeLike
This is not normal!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hate to indulge in conspiracy theories, but I’ve said before in this blog’s forums that I see Trump as a Trojan Horse for the nutcase right wing of the Republican Party. Mulvaney is certainly a piece of evidence that confirms this theory–although so are the rest of Trump’s appointees. These are scary people, and now they will have real power.
Thanks, Trump voters!
LikeLike
Absolutely
LikeLike
Ditto.
LikeLike
I actually think that Steve Bannon—the ultra-right wing, proto-Nazi mentality—is the driving force behind most of these horrendous appointments. It’s disgusting that a candidate that lost by roughly 3 MILLION votes could have the ability to impose these vicious, revolting choices on we the majority!
It’s almost as if Bannon sat down and thought, “What appointments will anger progressives the most and do the maximum amount of damage to the country’s social structure in the minimum amount of time, so that even if and when we have to leave office, it’ll be too far gone for anyone to repair?”
We have but one choice: To resist, and resist with all of our might, and offer no “honeymoon” or “compromise” with the extreme ultra-right. If history offers us any lessons it’s that these type of people only understand resistance and defeat and THAT is what we must offer!
LikeLike
Well stated. We have to organize and resist, and I hope the Democrats develop a spine so they will do the same in Congress. This is not a time to go along to get along. We need to fight every bad idea and rollback of the social safety nets.
LikeLike
Hi, retired teacher, an article on Elizabeth Warren yesterday commented on her “steely” spine and I loved it…. I have a pin in my back from a car accident so I hope I can develop the steel spine like E. Warren!!! I so admire her.
LikeLike
there is a big discussion in my home state about whether League of Women Voters should participate in the Washington march or the Boston march (to be held on the same day)…. I paid my dues to the organization ($65) to be a part of the charter consensus study but my money in the future will probably be better spent with Emily’s Llist, Planned parenthood, NARAL etc…. Organize and resist. That is also what Barbara Madeloni (teacher union prez) is saying (she is quoted today in the news because the commissioner on MA is pushing more an d more tests;…. That commissioner is just so horrid (Mitchell Chester) because he goes around to conferences and gets invited to speak and tells every other state to “sign on with Jeb Bush and buy Pearson products/tests”….
I cannot be “neutral” or “bipartisan ” on these issues at all.. I think of Ursula Hegi’s descriptions of children in their school and I think of the children in Schindler’s List sitting on the sidewalks (little kids I think he put them in bright colors for that portrayal?) and they are yelling ‘goodbye jews” and I know that prejudice locks in at age 4. My niece in Albany (high school) was given the assignment of Elie Wiesel’s speech about indifference and anger and the teacher did not build enough discussion or support for the students because it was supposed to be a “cold” reading … (like the new close readinglite) poorly handled.
LikeLike
they are all bad; there is no one worst among them….. and the republican governors like Charlie Baker who says “wait ‘n see, folks” while he gathers his hedge fund buddies in Boston thinking he will reap whirlwind benefits from Trump. Every opportunity to stop these horrendous policies — at state level as well and don’t forget the “thinky” tanks who are feeding the policy lines to the politicians like Fordham Institute and Jay P Greene…. Their “jocular” frat boy humor has gone way too far . Such arrogance to sit in Boston (or U. Arkansas) and threaten all groups of people — when they pass around white papers in Boston that say “those cities have outlived their usefulness of housing immigrants and manufacturing)…. These “men in suits” (mostly caucasian, arrogant, and elitist ) have to be told when they are wrong. They use their “market” ideology as their excuse but they are absolutely wrong — it is a belief system and the evidence tells us the “market” reforms in education are not working yet this is all they have to offer “privatize” everything. https://jaypgreene.com/2016/10/17/which-american-state-will-be-first-to-go-upside-down-on-the-diaper-market/ (the Lubienskis ‘ book on Pubic Education Effect” has some well thought analyses of this strategy ( just as in “Waking the Frog” the Canadian scientist author says the “Free market” is a fallacy and the wrong paradigm.
LikeLike
Jean Haverhill, I so respect your background & measured, researched posts. So to read this one makes me think we surely must be in trouble…
LikeLike
thanks for understanding ; I had lunch with a friend today (she was City Clerk and had to run all the elections) we are both divorced and neither of us has a chid …. but we are both fearful. She expressed it as “if the mushroom clouds come over Havrhill in the 2017 it won’t have much effect on you and I jean”.. but we worry about those other people’s kids (for example my sister has about 21 grandchildren spread from CA to Seattle , OK, TX etc. So we did share a little laugh knowing that our own futures are pretty much “locked in” (and feeling relatively safe in MA a “blue” state). If you would like some “meat to chew on” to get away from the mournful rage (and my gallows humor today) The Art of Teaching Science has a good blog article today. Also, we have to continue our work in MA on charter schools because the governor is relentless and Trump and Devos will be spreading money like wildfire/ and governor baker already said he is in line for some of that dough… so I just finished the Lubienski book — our charter school “consensus” study is due in on Feb 1st so I’ll be summarizing what I read in Lubienski (I put it in BATS with about 4 comments)…. It will take me another post to go and get Art of Teaching Science blog (he was so very helpful to me at the time of the Boston Marathon bombing and I try to follow all of his posts)….
LikeLike
it will take me one more comment section to get ART OF TEACHING SCIENCE comments but her is the book he is recommending https://georgelakoff.com/2016/12/21/on-moral-politics/
LikeLike
here is Jack Hassard’s comment on the book (since Jack recommends it I will buy it tomorrow) sorry if it doesn’t comet through in url/format ; I have one eye and doctor limits my computer work to 1 hour a day…. you can google Jack Hassard and get his post for Dec 21
On Moral Politics
by Jack Hassard
Originally posted on George Lakoff: This is an important book by Dr. Lakoff. I highly recommend it. You will many articles in my blog that reference George Lakoff’s work, and in the age of The Authoritarian, it critical to share Lakoff’s views with many. George Lakoff writes: Two decades ago, in 1996, I published a […]
Read more of this post
LikeLike
just so you don’t think all my time is spent complaining, here is a summary of the Lubienski (husband and wife) book on The Public School Effect….. Lubienski (husband and wife) call them “Incentivizers” (whereas Pence would call them “uberizers”) They believe (incentivizers/uberizers) that the market model with competition will boost test scores. This has not been proven. A Canadian scientist writes how this paradigm is not correct in Waking the Frog; why the market model is NOT going to help us with climate change.
Lubienskis found two indicators that predicted test scores: teacher certification and reliance on instructional practices and reliance on instructional practices informed by professional guidelines (the kinds of good advice you get from IRA or NCTM etc)…The authors conclude “because public school teachers are subject to more stringent certification regulations as well as more frequent professional development and oversight they end up being more plugged in to recent advances in curricuum and instruction.” They also report that , in charter schools with “autonomy” , it can lead to curricular stagnation instead of promoting instructional innovation …” The whole purpose they sold for charters in MA was this great “innovation” that was supposed to be taking place in charters and when the State Auditor reports, it does not exist. .. the commissioner’s office has a file called an “archive”…. with no evaluation or dissemination /diffusion of the ill-defined innovations.
Lubienskis concur that is is obvious why ELL and students with disability have lower test scores; however, they report that people do not acknowledge that higher SES boosts test scores (more affluent get higher test scores) and this has been denied. “More access to books, high quality health care, cultural and social capital, the relationship between class and academic achievement is a subject that should not be ignored.” (The is what teachers have been repeatedly saying). “Traditional public schools are NOT failing to keep pace with charter and private schools. On the contrary, traditional public schools in some cases appear to have advantages over other kinds of schools that are usually perceived as more “innovative”. http://bostonreview.net/us/snyder-public-private-charter-schools-demographics-incentives-markets – (lubienski book)
Lubienskis examined two main datasets — a longitudinal study of more than 20,000 students who started kindergarten in the fall of 1998, and the 2003 NAEP which surveyed more than 300,000 fourth and eighth graders. The authors conclude that “the private school effect is a myth”. Call it the public school effect; traditional public schools hold a slight edge over charters which are roughly comparable demographically…., The Lubienskis extensive analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative datasets produced results that run counter to the usual “stuff” that is out there in headlines in articles and newspapers being sold as “sexy” and innovative.
By the last chapter the Lubienskis , state clearly, that “market-based educational reform is increasingly a belief system rather than a policy theory. We are living in an era in which the solution is always markets..the allure of markets is irresistible — it doesn’t matter what the problem is — the solution is always markets. ” (see Lubienskis definition of Manichean terms)
Lubienskis state that , in competitive markets, “schools tend to invest more resources in screening out lower-performing students whose sub-par test scores would damage the school’s academic reputation; or they spend more money on marketing in order to keep the enrollment numbers up. (cf. the U. of Phoenix reported that for profit colleges tend to spend approximately a quarter of their revenue on sales and marketing while dedicating only 10 – 20 percent to faculty /students etc. ; (do we really want K-12 public education to follow that model?)
I have spent lot of time on these comments because I am co-chair of a “charter school ” study and would like input from any people reading the comments to put into our consensus report for the study.
LikeLike
http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo16956223.html p.s. when you google this book on Amazon it will tell you “people who bought this book also bought” and they have Diane’s book at the top of the list. (Reign of Error)
LikeLike
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/trumps-pick-budget-director-isnt-sure-government-should-fund-scientific-research
LikeLike
Mulvany doesn’t think the federal government should fund research? The Feds are the most important source of funding for basic scientific and medical research.
LikeLike
In fact, Diane, you are correct. The pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies depend upon this federally funded basic research. They use it “for free,” because the results are published for all to see in scientific journals.
If everyone thinks that drugs and other medical treatments and devices are terribly expensive now, just wait until those companies have to also spend money on their own basic research.
Which, frankly, will mostly never get done, unless such research has promises of making them a lot of money in the future- the more immediate the future, the better for their bottom line.
The companies are not eleemosynary institutions, they exist to make money for their owners/shareholders.
LikeLike
Mulvaney asks a good question in this FB post– a Q which can only be answered by further research (presumably, govt-funded). And– w/o govt funding– would he even have known of the Columbia stats?
LikeLike
March 17, 2017 – the date to raise the debt limit ceiling – in prior years after lots of “dancing” both houses came to an agreement – this time the Trumpsters will use deep cuts in Medicare and SS as bargaining chips … the “crisis” might come up real quick!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person