Allie Gross of Detroit Metro Times reports that the state released its list of the schools that are in the bottom 5%. Most are in Detroit, which has been controlled by the state since 2009. Almost every one of the schools in the state-created Educational Achievement Authority schools are on the “failing” list.
Gross asks: “Can We Finally Say a State Takeover Doesn’t Work?”
She writes:
“Of the 15 schools in the Education Achievement Authority — a state-run district that was created based off the 2011 Top to Bottom List — 13 of them are listed as failing once again, and one — Phoenix Elementary-Middle School — is listed as being closed.
That means that schools that were taken out of Detroit Public Schools in the 2012-13 school year (i.e. taking funds away from the traditional school district), and placed in a state-controlled district under the auspices of a “turn around” (that DPS couldn’t do it itself) are still — four years later — on the list of worst performers. Ninety-three percent of the schools in the EAA are still considered, at least based on test scores, as under-performing schools.
“Snyder, who came into office promising voters relentless positive action, has instead disenfranchised local electorates while delivering relentlessly negative — even catastrophic — results,” Wayne State University School of Education associate professor Thomas Pedroni tells MT, referring to the EAA — which Snyder orchestrated in the spring of 2011 — as well as the Flint water crisis, and the governor’s creation of PA436.
While it is likely that the EAA will cease to exist in the coming years — Eastern Michigan University, which helps authorize the district, voted in February to withdraw their support in June 2017 — the continued failure of the district raises questions about experimentation and state takeovers.
As former MT investigative reporter Curt Guyette exposed — via a bevy of Freedom of Information Act requests — in September 2014: Much of the curriculum used in this “recovery district” has never been tested before, and was rather a beta program created by for-profit tech company Agilix Labs, who essentially used the EAA — with the permission of its appointed board — to test a new learning management system that it hoped to then market to other districts.
“The companies needed the EAA’s students to do well in order to prove the effectiveness of their products when making sales pitches to other schools and districts,” wrote Guyette, who found a number of back-and-forth emails between EAA officals, Agilix, and a company called the School Improvement Network [SINET] indicating that the software was riddled with bugs and a headache for teachers and students.”
With the EAA in shambles, Governor Snyder’s next plan is to close schools that are in the bottom 5% for three years in a row.
That’ll help. What then for the children? Will he bus them to Grosse Pointe? Ha. Believe it when it happens.

The rich-poor divide is killing public education, at least in cities like Detroit. Public education continues to work well—you could even say it’s thriving—in wealthier communities.
I’m starting to think that privatization is not about profit-making. It’s about easing the consciences of wealthy individuals, who’ve made a lot of money and want a cheap solution for society’s less fortunate class. it’s Dickensonian in a way, with vouchers and charters working like street-corner handouts. The poor who conform to strict control measures, like early 19th century laborers or early 21st century Success Academy students, are given a living wage but nothing better.
The sadness of our situation comes out in this AP article about rich-poor school funding. Diane, please consider posting it as a blog entry:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/37c22cdf81504e5386e8a029e5ba94c7/divided-america-recovery-many-poor-schools-left-behind
LikeLiked by 2 people
I would like to see the funding gaps between rich and poor districts in many other states as well. This is not just an Illinois problem; it is national problem as most districts fund schools through real estate taxes. It would be interesting to see what is happening across the states.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The “good” allowing the “rich” to de-educate the “poor.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like!
LikeLike
“. . . are given a living wage but nothing better.”
Uhhmmm! NO! They aren’t even given a living wage-not even close. Ask that 40% of Walmart’s full time employees who qualify and are encouraged by their employer to apply and receive food and other public aid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those failing schools will only claim they need more time, like 10,000 years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gov. Snyder’s plan for education in Michigan:
• eliminate local control for public schools in Detroit and other majority-minority communities
• create an Educational Achievement Authority (EAA) to take over control for these schools
• allow virtually unlimited and unregulated charter school expansion in the state, creating parallel systems of schools in the state: one consisting of under-funded traditional public schools, the other of privately-run, publicly-funded schools
• institute scripted lesson plans and canned curricula
• establish illogical and invalid teacher evaluation systems
• hire uncertified teachers to replace veteran educators who have been driven out of the schools
• proclaim the schools a “failure”
• close the “bottom 5%”
• slink out of office in shame, leaving his mess behind for the next governor to clean up
And every step of his plan has been approved and paid for by the DeVos family, and their corporate mouthpieces, the Mackinac Center and the Great Lakes Education Project.
Keep talking, Rick.
The nation is starting to realize what you’ve been up to.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d like to know who owns or supplies money to Agilix?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I took a look and they are proudly partnered with?…..Pearson
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many good companies partner with Pearson. That shouldn’t be a blackmark.
Agilix was founded in 2001. So it’s been around for a while in the education space and has done some good things. Now it may have gotten sucked into the “personalized learning” maelstrom, but that’s because, well, that’s where a lot of dollars are being spent.
I’d be careful about throwing the baby out with the bath water. Schools need companies to supply them with various tools. That’s not just capitalism. It’s important because teachers can’t develop everything they need for themselves. Some companies are better or worse than others at providing the tools, and teachers/administrators can make that decision.
For us, the more important question is: Why is computer-based personalized learning a substitute for highly-trained teachers? It is hurting, not helping, the poorest students, who are mostly in urban communities and often in charter schools.
The worst-off students should get the best teachers, real human teachers who have years of practical experience and are deeply committed to their profession. Instead, those teachers are discouraged by the privatization movement, by over-testing, and by terrible education practices of many if not most charter schools. So they’re heading for the exits or re-locating to wealthier suburban districts, which the disparity worse.
The whole system is crushing the poor. They won’t be saved by machines, which is how the public should view “personalized learning” software. There is very little market for that software in wealthier districts, which tells us lot. It’s considered a remediation tool only. It would be a drag on actual college- and career-bound students. What the most disadvantaged students need are real teachers, mentors, caring individuals, and role models. not machines!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Can We Finally Say a State Takeover Doesn’t Work?”
Can we finally stop using standardized test scores as the assessing device to declare such thing?
LikeLiked by 1 person