Jennifer Rubin is the Washington Post’s designated conservative blogger. Her blog is called “Right Turn.”
She posted a scathing commentary yesterday that expressed her complete disgust with the GOP’s standard-bearer. Republican leaders ran for cover or went silent after Trump’s belittling of the Khan family, the Muslim parents who lost their son in combat in Iraq. His contemptuous comments sounded a lot like his outrageous statement during the campaign that John McCain was no hero, after serving years in a brutal prisoner-of-war camp, because he got caught. Trump, who never served in the military, said that heroes don’t get caught. Apparently, he also thinks that heroes don’t get killed in action saving others.
This is what Jennifer Rubin wrote about this vulgar, ignorant, narcissist and his enablers:
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and vice-presidential nominee Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana (R) knew what they were getting into when they climbed aboard the Donald Trump bandwagon. They had watched him insult minorities, POWs, the disabled and women. They had seen for themselves how utterly ignorant he was about basic policy concepts. They knew he lied about big and small things (e.g., falsely saying he opposed the Iraq War, reneging on charity pledges until shamed by The Post). They knew he’d stiffed and swindled Trump U students. They never should have backed him; they were abetting a vile individual attaining the country’s most powerful office, for which he was patently unfit. Pence went a step further in agreeing to be his running mate, and now travels around the country cheerleading for Trump.
Now Trump demeans two Gold Star parents. When slammed, he does not apologize or retract the remarks. He insists he has read the Constitution but then claims Gold Star father Khizr Khan has “no right” to criticize him. In a pathetic statement trying to paper over his egregious remarks, he does not apologize to the Khans nor retract his insults. The world-class narcissist claims to be worthy of the same sympathy (I sacrificed too!) as the parents who lost their son. (As an aside, it would a spectacular instance of political karma if after smearing all Muslims and attacking their patriotism, Trump would see two patriotic Muslim parents hammer the final nails in his campaign coffin.)
What does Pence, father of Marine 2nd Lt. Michael J. Pence, do? He directs the press wanting comment to Trump. Really, that’s it? One wonders how 2nd Lt. Pence — and all the other Americans risking their lives — feel about that. Pence’s silence and continued presence on the ticket suggest he considers Trump within the bounds of normal political discourse. If Pence had a modicum of dignity or decency, he would tell the American people, “I made a terrible mistake. Mr Trump is so morally bankrupt and of such shabby character that I could not possibly serve with him.” Failing to do so, the same should be said of Pence.
In his interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Trump also revealed he did not know Russia had invaded Ukraine. (Putin’s “not gonna go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down.”) When George Stephanopoulos told him it already had, he repeated the Kremlin’s talking point that the people of Crimea wanted Russia to invade.
Here’s what happened after Khizr Khan’s Democratic convention speech.
The offices of Ryan and McConnell wouldn’t comment on Trump’s slur against Ghazala Khan or ludicrous claim he’s “sacrificed” just as the Khans have. Their spokesmen would only repeat the bosses’ prior remarks on Trump’s Muslim stances. That’s not the point. They know this but they are abdicating moral leadership because they cannot possibly justify their support of Trump. In their silence, they condone Trump and stand with him. They should be standing with the Khans. Do these congressional “leaders” actually have nothing to say about the cruel attack on two parents who now go to other military funerals to honor their son? Republicans’ refusal to un-endorse Trump puts their own character and judgment in doubt. It is fair to say that the Republicans who cheer him on — not Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.), who refused to — are signing their own political death warrants.
It’s not just cruelty toward the Khans — although this alone should be grounds for banishment from public life. Just this week Trump said he wanted to do violence to former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg and lied that he turned down a meeting with the Koch brothers (two real billionaires whose wealth and charitable generosity dwarf Trump’s and who have refused to back him). In fact, the Koch brothers should get brownie points for refusing to meet with Trump.
Trump continues to insist he’s been a business success and charitable marvel, but he won’t release his tax returns, strongly suggesting he is lying about both. The Koch brothers, “the owners of Koch Industries, one of the world’s biggest conglomerates, have kicked in an estimated $1.5 billion or so to an array of causes and institutions most liberals love: public television, medical research, higher education, environmental stewardship, criminal justice reform and the arts.” Where is the evidence Trump has done even a fraction of that? Where are the hospitals, the civic institutions, the science labs, the schools, the homeless shelters and soup kitchens he’s paid for? He either doesn’t have substantial sums to give or he’s a selfish cheapskate.
Trump’s penchant for lying (e.g., that he had a “relationship with Putin” which on Sunday he denied; that the NFL sent him a letter begging him to change the debate schedule), his abject lack of human empathy and his stunning ignorance now put his protectors, such as Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, and his endorsers, such as Sens. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and Marco Rubio (Fla.), in a tough spot entirely of their own making. Republicans who fell in line behind Trump cannot escape the moral stench he emits. He disrespects parents of a fallen warrior; they do as well with their silence. He attacks other Americans, lies habitually and embodies none of the qualities we expect of elected leaders; they demonstrate moral and political cowardice in refusing to condemn him.
It’s no longer sufficient for Republicans to rebuke Trump’s loony positions or foul statements. There are too many of both. The problem is not one of policy but of the nominee himself. Republicans must rebuke Trump himself and cease supporting him. Silence is consent. And consent is disqualifying for high office.
UPDATE: McConnell put out a statement that entirely ignored Trump and his reprehensible remarks directed at the Gold Star family.. “Captain Khan was an American hero, and like all Americans, I’m grateful for the sacrifices that selfless young men like Capt. Khan and their families have made in the war on terror,” McConnell said. “All Americans should value the patriotic service of the patriots who volunteer to selflessly defend us in the armed services.” It’s totally, embarrassingly insufficient.

I, too am a Republican who will never vote for this clown.
LikeLike
Stan…here is a statement made by John McCain’s granddaughter today in support of your position, against tRump.
View at Medium.com
We see in only the past few days famous Republicans coming out publicly against tRump who is so irresponsible and of such unsound mind that he should probably be in a locked ward, not on the camaign trail.
A Repub General spoke on the morning shows yesterday against tRump
Billionaire leaders Michael Bloomberg and Mark Cuben spoke against tRump.
Insider from the Reagan era spoke against tRump.
McConnell and Ryan spoke out against tRump.
McCain himself today spoke against tRump.
On an on…most responsible Repubs are speaking out against tRump.
What will it take to get rid of this con man?
LikeLike
ouch….I cannot get her statement to post…only this Hillary ad comes up. I still don’t like this overbearing Dem DNC garbage…and am not with her…but I AM VOTING FOR HILLARY TO GET RID OF tRUMP.
LikeLike
Here is the body of McCain’s granddaughter’s statement. The link will not transfer. Worth reading this long narrative.
July 18, 2015 — The day I became NeverTrump
.
If you know me at all, you know I am a woman fiercely loyal to my friends and family. And so it was on July 18 when I already knew that I had enough reason to never vote for Trump.
Following a line of other right-wing wacko birds, Trump insulted a man I esteem and love, a man who has risked his life in service of his country. He insulted my grandfather and attacked the very qualities — loyalty, bravery and selflessness — that he and countless other POWs embody. He mocked the sacrifice many have given and the anguish families have endured when their heroes have suffered alone miles away.
My grandfather responded with grace and forgiveness — as only a man who was held in captivity for years can. But I’ve been nursing a grudge ever since. Trump’s statement, in my view, is unforgivable, and speaks to the kind of man he is: a coward who has never faced danger in his life, an insecure brat who shirked duty for comfort, and a man who is wholly unfit to serve as commander-in-chief.
Donald Trump lost my respect that day, and he can never gain it back.
But there are many, many more reasons why I cannot vote for him.
It didn’t take long for it to move beyond the personal, as week after week went by, and Donald Trump laid brick after brick in a wall of racist comments, lies, misogyny and ignorance that slowly climbed taller than the wall he promised to build.
He lacks the temperament and the wisdom to navigate our ever-increasingly dangerous world. Policy decisions aside, being President of the United States requires a steady hand — and never moreso than now. A competent commander-in-chief must respond to threats to the Republic, but Trump only responds to threats to his ego.
He has repeatedly called for the increase of torture, and for murdering the families of islamic jihadists.
He is the result of a demand for ideological purity at all costs, and the bastard child of talk radio and entertainment TV.
He’s made promise after promise he never intended to keep — from giving money to veterans (which he never did) to protecting Americans jobs (while applying for foreign worker permits for his own hotels).
He is a misogynist — insulting and demeaning women in his professional and personal circles. He is a racist — calling immigrants rapists and suggesting judges of Mexican descent should be prevented from serving. And he is a demagogue — preying on people’s most base fears and promising to cure them like some demented salesman.
Never Meant Never
What began for me on July 18th only became further entrenched. Months later, never still meant never.
November, and “Never” was easy. I started working for a presidential candidate who embodied hope and could communicate a different kind of future than the one Trump was painting, a candidate who would carry a banner of conservatism that could shape an entire generation.
“Never” was convenient then, because it illustrated just how committed I was to my candidate and our team.
March 15, and “Never” was a bit irrational. But even in the disappointment of defeat, I held fast to the anchor I had let down in July — never would mean never. Even if my guy could not win this time around I would not bring myself to vote for a man I not only disagreed with, but who in my view posed a unique threat to conservatism and to our Republic.
But if “Never” meant No Trump, than who would it mean? I rationalized and reasoned with myself —in spite of knowing what was coming and what was at that point inevitable — that I didn’t have to decide anything now. I could still hold out hope (live in denial) and put off any actual decision until it was absolutely necessary. I still had choices, then.
These are the choices we have.
This is not the election I wanted. These are not the choices I wanted. But these are the choices we have. And to pretend otherwise is naivety.
If we lived in a system where third-party candidates stood a chance to win, then it would be a different choice. A third-party candidate could be a chance to exercise my civic responsibility while protecting my conscience.
But as things stand now, a third-party candidate cannot win the presidency. Additionally, without a coalition in other branches of government, a third-party candidate would be hamstrung and limited in their ability to pass meaningful legislation.
And still, there were bright spots and outside chances that a legitimate candidate could emerge. That a candidate better for America would rise up like a messiah and rescue us from this mess that we probably created. And even then, if that wasn’t possible, at least some conservatives stood in the face of retribution and suggested that voting your conscience was a brave and necessary act.
For the last several months, I’ve wrestled with my options. Sitting at home and not voting, voting for a candidate whose party I’ve long opposed, or exercising a vote of conscience with either a third party candidate or a write-in.
But I’ve realized that what matters about my vote is not whether it makes me feel good — it’s about whether it leads to the common good. And I started to realize that for some, “voting your conscience” has become a euphemism for protecting your self interest. An exercise in privilege.
If I’ve heard anything from my friends who are gay, my friends who are black, my friends whose rights have been pushed against and infringed upon while mine have been neatly protected, it is this: there is a real fear that a “vote your conscience” movement could siphon #NeverTrump votes away from Hillary, and in a cruel turn of events, a nation’s conscience is sacrificed to elect a clown.
An Opening
On the penultimate night of the Democratic National Convention, the Democrats made a calculated play for disaffected Republican voters. I don’t think it was hard to miss, but maybe that’s because it felt like they were speaking to me.
I have never been on board with Obama’s agenda. I think he’s damaged our foreign relations and dramatically increased the power of the presidency in ways detrimental to our country. It is also a strange barrier to cross when he is the man who defeated your grandfather on a national stage. Did I mention I’m fiercely loyal to my family?
But that night as he spoke, and he talked about American exceptionalism, and he talked about hope, and he talked about ingenuity and the resilience of the American people, he spoke to me. He reminded me of the choice before me.
He could have pointed blame at the GOP for enabling Trump’s rise. He could have taken party leadership to task for falling in line behind Trump. But he didn’t. He instead presented the election as a choice between democracy and demagogue. He gave Republicans the option to abandon Trump rather than blaming them for his rise.
There are so many things I disagree with President Obama on, but this is a moment I will always respect him for. And maybe this was the moment I needed to fully own the choice I would have to make in November.
Can I even call myself a Republican?
Over a year ago, on a walk with a friend through the thick DC humidity, we talked about campaigns and politics and the primaries. We talked about Trump and his outrageousness, his ignorance, and the dangers he’d pose to my party (not hers), and the dangers he’d pose to our world. But then, he was just a joke. I was angry about his comments, but I was still able to laugh them off. He wasn’t a serious threat to our world, because he couldn’t possibly win the nomination. Yet even then, I said to her,
“If Donald Trump wins the nomination, I don’t know if I can call myself a Republican any more.”
And that is where I am. The party I grew up in, the party I want to work in and change and push to be more inclusive, betrayed me and countless others. The party chose for its king a demagogue who wears a wig instead of a crown, and a celebrity in pursuit of fame and fortune rather than service and sacrifice.
If this is where the party is going — building walls to keep immigrants out, irrationally objecting to international trade, railing against marriage equality, then I’m gone. If this is where the nominee — who was for abortion before it was politically expedient, who is a racist and a misogynist, who wants to carpet bomb the Middle East and ban Muslims, wants to take the party — then I want nothing to do with it.
Loyalty to party can never trump loyalty to country. And loyalty to party means nothing when the party has been poisoned.
Whether the party can recover from this cycle remains to be seen. But it’s impossible to predict what will happen to the GOP a year from now. It’s impossible to discern whether this is a reckoning, or simply an adjustment. Whether the party will self-correct or has been irreparably damaged.
There are those who insist the party is dying, and the RNC was its wake. There are others who believe, perhaps naively, that a rebirth is possible. I am hopeful for a rebirth, a restart — but it will be impossible with Trump and his talk-radio minions at the helm.
But I am not yet ready to call myself a Democrat.
My political philosophy is still fundamentally Republican — focused on self-reliance, states’ rights, a government that steps in when it should, for a free people who recognize it’s not the best option most of the time.
Meanwhile, the current incarnation of the Democratic party is pushing too far left on abortion, ignoring the realities of a disfigured Islamic jihad, and encouraging a ballooning government that is too large and tilted toward the executive office.
And I have issues with Hillary Clinton — and I don’t really mean the emails. Her family’s financial decisions with their foundation are questionable and raise potential ethical problems as she steps into the most powerful role in the world. Her inaccessibility to the press is troubling. And looking back on the 1990s, it seems like she made decisions that protected her own power and standing at the expense of others.
But I learned something important in 2000 and again in 2008: the picture the opposition and the media paints of a candidate is not the whole picture, and it is not the truthful picture.
I wanted our nation to see what I saw, and to believe the best about my grandfather — to believe he was driven by service more than ambition, that his decisions were always made in view of a nation rather than of himself. To believe that any mistakes he had made were not intentional, and to believe that his compromise was faithfulness to, and not a betrayal of, his duty.
So I can, and should, do the same for Hillary. I (and you) don’t have to buy into a demonized portrait that has been painted of her for years. I can question her policy without questioning her character. I can criticize her past decisions, without reading corruption back into all of them. I can believe those closest to her when they say her faith is authentic, her character good, and her ambition animated by a heart of service.
July 27, 2016 — The day I finally decided
I wanted a different candidate. I wanted a New American Century. I wanted an election with good ideas and good discourse. I wanted to win. But now I want my party to change. I want fresh leaders, of good character, in both parties. And I want Donald Trump to be humiliated in November and driven far from the political arena for the rest of his life.
So I’m not a Democrat — at least not yet. But this year, I’m With Her.
LikeLike
Thanks Ellen for posting McCain’s granddaughter’s sincere, powerful and perceptive statements on Trump and the whole situation before us. She’s incredibly wise for one so young.
LikeLike
The party of no deserves Trump, has worked hard to lay the groundwork for a banana head like Trump and is the logical last phase (one can only hope) of 30 years of Reaganism and George W. Bushism. The GOP is eating itself alive, please, continue the process and go poof forever.
LikeLike
I disagree on one point, that the rethugs have worked hard to lay the groundwork for a Trump like candidiate. Trump is the result of the factionalism and all but total disarray within the GOP brought about in no small part by the insurgency of the Teafarty, the same folks who blindsided Eric Cantor out of office. Bottom line is, the reason we have Trump to kick around is that no viable candidate with anything resembling mainstream appeal could possibly rise out of the shambles of the GOP. In addition, their own brand of political correctness which demands that all march in lockstep with the power brokers of the ossified old guard certainly didn’t help matters. In walks Trump making pie in the sky, populist promises to the disenfranchised and ignored rethuglican base and suddenly the choice between backing a phony outsider who is hugely popular vs. an uninspiring survivor of the infighting became clear. The GOP bosses, in desperation, chose a toxic somebody over all the non descript nobodies.
LikeLike
Joe…here is another Repub who just left the Party due to crazy tRump.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/01/politics/sally-bradshaw-jeb-bush-donald-trump-florida/index.html
LikeLike
Off topic. Ohio’s Nina Turner, a Bernie backer, is considering a V.P. spot on the Green ticket.
LikeLike
Bernie asked Nina to second his nomination at the convention (after Tulsi Gabbard spoke), at the very last minute Nina was barred from speaking by the DNC, and replaced by a white male union leader who gave a rah rah speech for Hillary in Nina’s spot.
If Nina does decide to join the Green ticket, it will be in part due to the disrespect shown to her and other Bernie supporters by the DNC and Hillary.
The Hillary/DNC effort at “unity” has been to suppress and silence Bernie supporters, not welcome us into their coalition. The hiring of Debbie Wasserman Schultz onto Hillary’s campaign within moments of her stepping down from the DNC was an outrage and a signal that team Hillary will remain obstinant in the face of all criticism.
LikeLike
Concerned citizen, I don’t know anything about what happened behind the scenes at the convention. I don’t think Wasserman-Schultz was “hired” for anything. She got an “honorary” title, meaning she was kicked into a non-job.
LikeLike
Diane,
Bernie and Nina have been too principled to publicly attack the DNC/Hillary about what transpired at the convention. I will not stand on principle: I think the DNC didn’t like the idea of a beautiful, charismatic black woman with a growing nationwide fan base speaking on behalf of Bernie, so they put an overweight, inarticulate white guy with no national profile (who spent most of his speech cheer leading for Hillary) in Nina’s spot. Team Clinton desperately wanted to avoid the bad optics of Bernie being shown to have strong black and female support to a national audience.
Here is Bernie’s measured statement on the matter (source article below, this is the update at the very bottom):
“Michael Briggs, Sanders’ communications director, told Mother Jones in a statement: ‘The senator wanted Senator Turner to second his nomination and was disappointed that it didn’t happen. She has been one of Bernie’s strongest supporters.'”
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/nina-turner-sanders-democratic-national-convention
Why should the disgraced Debbie Wasserman-Schultz have any position at all with the Clinton campaign, honorary or not? Remember when Samatha Power resigned from Obama’s campaign for badmouthing Hillary? Debbie insulted Bernie in her role as ostensible neutral arbiter of the Dem primary, and her reward was to join Hillary’s campaign! If Hillary were genuine/sincere about wanting to unite the party, she would have left Debbie out in the cold until after the election.
LikeLike
Concerned Citizen, I agree.
LikeLike
Biden is holding a fund raiser for DWS.
LikeLike
Abigail, I think DWS is in big trouble in her district.
LikeLike
Concerned Citizen,
Thank you for the information. I hope that Tim Canova wins Wasserman-Schultz’s district.
LikeLike
How ironic that it is two Republican journalists who have called out Trump (George Will even resigned from the Republican Party). But where the hell is the so-called liberal media?! Just 5 minutes ago, on NPR, David Greene covered Trump’s outrageous remarks about Russia in a “let’s dig deeper to see if there’s some truth there” kind of way. That gives Trump ten minutes of radio time for audiences to consider that maybe he’s not such a big nut after all. Respected Los Angeles journalist Warren Olney is doing it, too. The infatuation with the outrage is causing blindness far beyond the Republican Party.
LikeLike
Yes. The media, liberal and conservative, are always “on” for Trump, even when he insults those who are present. He knows this and exploits the troops with anything outrageous enough to attract keep attention long enough to repeat himself several times. The “attention economy” is also shaped by Twitter and derivatives, stinglets in 140 characters.
LikeLike
Agree with you 100%, Karen. Many in our local media are a farce at reporting fairly and accurately. Thanks for pointing out Warren Olney, who we know so well and expect to always be on target.
LikeLike
I don’t think Trump can be defeated by accusations of rudeness, racism, or sexism. To his supporters who are fed up with establishment politics as usual, all that outrageous, politically incorrect stuff is evidence that Trump is an outsider, which bolsters his message.
Trump is running as an outsider populist who will restore the jobs lost to globalization and bad trade deals, and stand up to the special interests who donate to political campaigns because he’s already wealthy and can’t be bought.
Trump is making an economic argument to voters, and if he can be stopped it will be by exposing him as representing the same Wall St, big money interests that Clinton does. Then Trump supporters will stay home.
In 1992 the Bill Clinton campaign had an internal slogan, “it’s the economy, stupid.” It still is. Working class Americans have been facing stagnated wages and rising cost of living, particularly health care costs, for decades, Trump is offering them a lifeline.
Bernie appealed to the same people by pushing for $15 min wage, free college tuition, and medicare for all. So far it is unclear what Clinton has to offer to the working class. In the last week Clinton has been having billionaires like Mike Bloomberg, Mark Cuban, and Warren Buffet speak for her, but surrounding herself with billionaires is a tone-deaf reaction to the Trump phenomenon. I’m frightened for our country.
LikeLike
Excellent comment.
LikeLike
You are so observant. Trump’s base of voters are angry. They have never gotten out of the “fight/flight” stage of anger and their response to everything is gut instinct instead of using reason to move ahead. Trump can easily be tied to everything corporate and greed based. HRC was throwing a bone to Bernie supporters by allowing him to make his speech at the convention. She is just as tied up in the corporate greed as Trump. It is a sad state of affairs for US citizens of the declining “middle class”.
LikeLike
Good comments, concerned citizen…and we once again see that tRump supporters, to whom he directs his bigoted, violent, and false tirades, are the worst of our society and pick up on his cues, as David Duke and the KKK are doing, to further mayhem and discord.
LikeLike
It is always the economy that is the leading reason for voters to choose a candidate….in all countries, and all through history, it has been so. I made the comparison the other day to the rise of the Third Reich based on the failure of the German economy in 1928, and the rise of Communism. Again, I suggest a read of Wm. Shirer’s book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. He includes, as did Baker in his book on the Bush family, the active part played by Prescott Bush and Averill Harriman whose bank helped finance the Nazis movement, until about 1932 when Roosevelt intervened. Working Americans NOW who are in the lower and middle socio economic class, have not had a raise in income, and live on the same salaries as in 1968, from paycheck to paycheck.
But never in our history have we had such a virulent bigot as the candidate, tRump.
The latest polls show that citizens of color are about 81% for Hillary, with consideration for the 3 – 5% margin of error. The Latino community reflects their desire to remain in the US as respected working Americans, and the Black community, in addition, looks to tRumps allies like David Duke, and does not want to see the hooded Night Riders appear in our communities ever again.
LikeLike
While a brilliant political move, which achieved it’s intended result of goading Donnie into being even more disgusting than he usually is, using the suffering of the Khan family for that purpose (which also conveniently masked Hillary’s unabashed support for that invasion, which has helped set that part of the world aflame) is a gross act of moral cynicism.
Is is beyond the beyonds to suggest that Hillary bears moral responsibility for putting that young man in harm’s way, and by now attempting to benefit politically from that sleight of hand, she is conclusively demonstrating her ethical nullity?
I don’t think so, and do think that people should have no illusions about the moral rot at the center of the Clinton family and it’s machine.
We all know that Donnie has no shame, but should recognize that Hillary and her apparat are shameless, as well. Keep that in mind when President Clinton betrays teachers and public education (to refer to our little corner of the polity), and does worse globally.
LikeLike
Well, no, Diane, I’m not ok with White supremacy, but I think we should call this particular thread, since we’re clearly talking past each other.
LikeLike
Guess I’m just inured at this point to these – I must say it – irrational stories about Trump’s various and plentiful mortal sins. In the last couple of weeks, we have had a daily outpouring of shock – SHOCK! and awe from the media about Donald Trump to an extent that would leave less sceptical people thinking that finally, it is Trump, not Obama, who is the living Antichrist on earth (I always liked Walter Kaufmann’s nomination in 1950 of Friedrich Nietzsche for that role, one I think the late philosopher would have accepted with relish (and perhaps a little mustard). But no, it turns out that we have two Antichrists walking the earth at the same time: one – the overweening black man who didn’t know his place – the other the prideful businessman who dared to overthrow every bit of conventional wisdom among the political pundits and cognoscenti (maybe George Will resigned from the GOP in shame for being so consistently wrong about the 2016 primaries, except that would require that Mr Will actually had any shame).
Is there any possibility that all or most of these stories are just so much hot air? That they serve to continue the mainstream narrative carefully orchestrated by Team Clinton, the DNC, the Republican establishment, the Wall Street insiders, etc.?
I don’t like conspiracy theories that lack – if not smoking guns – plausibility + evidence. So I won’t claim that the above-listed entities have all sat together somewhere to plot the downthrow of Donald Trump. But it defies credulity that the one-sidedness of coverage since Trump was enshrined as the official GOP nominee and Hillary Clinton was canonized as the DNC’s pick (I don’t accept that the people actually selected her in a fair season of primaries and caucuses) is simply a function of how “god-awful” Mr Trump is. There’s certainly no shortage of very real sins of Sec. Clinton coming to light on a daily basis, and yet the focus of the vast majority of stories on TV and in the major print media is Trump’s meanness, stupidity, incompetence, evil, irascibility, unfitness, and inferiority to Hillary Rodham Clinton, our next Savior Incarnate. (With the current one, Barack Obama, perhaps headed to the Supreme Court!)
I have to hearken back to 2000 for coverage of a Presidential race being so slanted to besmirch one candidate and undermine his credibility while giving the other one a free pass from start to finish. Oh, yes, there are the usual whinges from the radical right about Benghazi, Hillary’s email server, and now the Sanders folks complaining like the old, cranky, sexist bastards we all are (even the women – young and old – of course) about a stolen primary race, but the real issues are being obscured by – you guessed it – Trump’s secret, evil deals with that other Satan-on-earth- Vladimir Putin!
So while I understand that all the kiddies are properly quaking in their boots and ready to cast multiple votes for Hillary (and against the racist, sexist, homophobic – even if he isn’t – xenophobic, scam artist heading GOP ticket), you must pardon my recalcitrant denseness in just not getting it and not buying in. Maybe after the coronation, I can be sent in for “regrooving.”
LikeLike
Michael,
You might consider the possibility that the stories about Trump are true. He is ignorant, greedy, boastful, narcissistic, and racist, misogynistic, and hateful. No one made that stuff up. He says the things that prove every charge against him.
Did he not say that a judge of Mexican heritage m, born in America, could not be fair? Did he not call women pigs and judge them by their boobs? Did he not say he would abandon NATO?
I could go on but you get the point. Every time he speaks without a script, he demonstrates his ignorance, mean spirit, and lack of judgment.
LikeLike
One of the biggest problems for me, Diane, is that electing Hillary does not change the conditions that created Trump. As noted above, Trump has an economic message that resonates with down and out people. Now, of course that message is full of bunk, but that doesn’t change the pain of the people who buy into it. Electing Hillary means four (or eight) more years of neoliberalism, during which that pain is likely to get worse, not better. Four years from now conditions are still going to be ripe for someone like Trump. And maybe that year’s Trump will be someone who’s not the blustering buffoon that Trump is – he (or maybe she) will be deadly serious and far better positioned to win the election and do more damage.
LikeLike
Dienne
Trump is well-positioned to win this election. Think BREXIT.
You deal with scoundrels one at a time. There is no long game here. There is today and tomorrow.
LikeLike
“There is no long game here.”
Well, thanks for that honesty, I guess.
LikeLike
Under Hillary, we will NOT see “strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees”….nor we will see vast roundups of Latinos to be deported, nor vast roundups of Muslims to be put in isolated internment…as we would if tRump is elected.
We will also see a more level economy, and we might even win back some respect from our NATO partners and all other countries, who are more and more alarmed by our politics…and tRump.
LikeLike
The Trump supporters I know are college graduates living solid middle class or better lives. There is nothing down and out about them. They are fed up with business as usual of American politics.
LikeLike
Plenty of undocumented immigrants have been deported under the Obama administration. I would avoid wishful thinking.
LikeLike
My point was that A list Democrats are coming to aid DWS. She is hardly out in the cold. Her opponent is an unknown. There are conflicting reports as to his chances. DWS’s district went to HRC. Canova’s support is largely coming from outside the state.
LikeLike
Abigail…my comments on Trump attracting the worst of American society did not imply these are the ‘great unwashed’ (don’t hammer me for this attribution) or the Duck Dynasty crowd alone. There is plenty of room in the Rep Party for bigots and greed meisters from country clubs and Wall Street.
At least the Dems who are “fed up with politics as usual” found Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein, and even Johnson/Weld….but the rational among Dems TODAY seem to understand the first order of political business is to beat tRUMP.
Then my personal goal would be for progressives to speak loudly and often, with Bernie in the lead carrying the messages to Congress. After all, the four year election cycle comes around very fast. Four years with Paul Ryan and Mitch McConell will fly by…and we will all have ulcers, again, Jon.
LikeLike
Two of the Trump supporters on my list were teachers with me in Newark. I never observed anything bigoted in their behavior. A restaurant that I frequent has a large number of people voting for Trump one of whom is the owner. They are not members of the KKK. They treat people of different origins with respect. Trump’s backers may be more broad based than we expect.
LikeLike
Perhaps, Abigail…and perhaps there is a difference between the East and West coasts, and the Midlands…ethos. In So. Cal., those I know voting for Trump are vociferous in their admiration of him…and they locked their minds away for any other points of view.
LikeLike
Really Ellen? You think it is regional? I have visited California twice briefly. I am in no position to form an opinion.
LikeLike
Diane, everything you say about Donnie can be, and is, true. But I was talking about Hillary, so it’s a bit of a deflection to automatically point once again to Trump.
I’ll say it again: while a deft move of real politik that clearly accomplished its purposes, Hillary’s pushing forward the Khan family’s loss in the way she did was an act of gross moral hypocrisy, manipulation and misdirection, and nothing Donald Trump has ever said or done negates that.
LikeLike
Diane, in all seriousness, I believe you’re taking Trump’s rhetoric too seriously and missing the deadly serious foreign policy track record and pronouncements of Madam Secretary Clinton. I get it and I’m not suggesting that I’d like to have Donald Trump over to my house for drinks. But I wouldn’t trust Hillary Clinton to keep us out of more neoliberal/neocon wars, something I believe Trump will avoid. Still not voting for him, but the repeated slanting of coverage to spotlight the low-hanging fruit of his bluster while ignoring the very frightening reality of Clinton and her advisors and mentors when it comes to Russia, Syria, Israel, China, etc., makes it impossible for me to vote for her.
You don’t seem to sense that you might just be having your buttons pushed, and quite intentionally so. I don’t think Trump wants to win. But if he does, I won’t spend every night quite as worried who’s being assassinated overseas or killed by “collateral damage” in an “oops!” bombing raid to kill our alleged enemies abroad.
Again, I get it: abortion, gay marriage, SCOTUS, etc. But in my smug white male privilege (living in my manufactured home, trying to get by on Social Security, part-time work, lack of Part D Medicare coverage I can’t afford, etc.), I think these social issues are a smokescreen for the much bigger economic and military games that both parties have been about for decades.
We got Obama in 2008! I was practically in tears for the joy I felt. And within a year, we saw that something was very much amiss. I don’t need a year to see what will be amiss with Hillary Clinton: more of the same neoliberal/neocon agenda abroad and, yes, at home. You’ll see her fighting for these social agendas, but darn, those evil Republicans will just make it too hard to win much. We won’t get single-payer health insurance and real coverage for EVERYONE. We won’t get across the board $15 minimum wage unless every state passes it individually. And poor black, Latino, white, and other people of poverty will get to go overseas to fight, die, or be ruined in more wars of imperialism and corporate greed. Who wins?
LikeLike
Michael,
I don’t share your cynicism. I am too old to be naive. But the idea of this ignorant fool in the White House, the guy with the hot temper, is more than I can bear.
Yes, I like Hillary. Yes, she makes me feel hopeful. I have been fooled before, but I think we have all been stuffed for 25 years with Republican Hate-Hillary talk.
#imwithher
LikeLike
Michael,
Trump is the party of White Nationalism. If you are okay with that, so be it.
I am not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To MPG and Dienne:
Here are the words from “credential” Republican voter, Carolyn McCain who knows very well how American legislative system works:
[start quote]
… If we lived in a system where third-party candidates stood a chance to win, then it would be a different choice. A third-party candidate could be a chance to exercise my civic responsibility while protecting my conscience.
But as things stand now, a third-party candidate CANNOT WIN THE PRESIDENCY
Additionally, without a coalition in other branches of government, a third-party candidate would be hamstrung and LIMITED in their ABILITY TO PASS meaningful legislation.
… But I’ve realized that what matters about my vote is not whether it makes me feel good — it’s about whether it leads to the common good.
And I started to realize that for some, “voting your conscience” has become a euphemism for protecting your self-interest. An exercise in privilege.
If I’ve heard anything from my friends who are gay, my friends who are black, my friends whose rights have been pushed against and infringed upon while mine have been neatly protected, it is this:
there is a real fear that a “vote your conscience” movement could siphon #NeverTrump votes away from Hillary,
and in a CRUEL TURN of events, a nation’s conscience is SACRIFICED TO ELECT A CLOWN.
[end quote]
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/01/us/paul-manafort-ukraine-donald-trump.html
(this article is on July 31, 2016)
In short, please open the link if you have a subscription for NYT. This is an awakening SHOCK of the truthfulness in the mixed politics and economy for all gullible, but intelligent people, like you.
There is no conspiracy, but manipulation of all con men and women who priority is to protect and sustain their own wealth and privileges at the cost and the expense of many, many commoners’ generations’ life-less living.
IMHO, Trump is not clown, but a talent-less person, but he craves to be a nobleman: the President of the United States.
Republican party intentionally treats their members as deaf, dumb and blind by selecting Trump into Presidential Candidacy and eventually a nominee. Back2basic
LikeLike
So what’s your long game? To continue to shrug and say third-parties aren’t viable?
LikeLike
You advance one step at a time. Sometimes you make a strategic retreat, so you live to fight another day.
There was a famous exchange which I may misquote. I believe it was the civil rights icon A. Philip Randolph who met with FDR and made the case for changes. According to legend, FDR said, I agree with you. Now go out and make me.
Trump will never listen to you or me. I may be wrong but I think that if we build up our forces, if we amass our troops, we can promote the goals we want. Bernie understands that the long game means throwing out reactionaries up and down the ticket. Elect people who share your values for city council, school board, state legislature, Congress, and governor.
That’s the long game.
LikeLike
The good news is that Bernie is still in the senate and he is like a third party candidate all unto himself who broke through the glass ceiling of third party candidates to actually make it into government.
LikeLike
Don’t waste your time and energy being distracted by Trump, he is nothing more than a figurehead. It’s time for the lame stream media and everyone else to start focusing on all of the toxic ideas in the GOP platform, to start talking about what it actually contains and what the agenda of the GOP will be should Trump be elected. That’s where the real danger lies. That is what the debate and the election should be about in the first place, not all this asinine personality cult nonsense. Trump’s continued frothing at the mouth is not relevant to examining the GOP platform, it’s a click bait diversion away from it. The greatest danger isn’t that Trump may be elected, it’s the GOP insiders and cronies that have chosen to back him along with their insane ideologies that are the greatest danger as those “usual suspects” quietly seek to ride his coat tails into power. Trump will have no more power over congress than any other president, likely quite a lot less. Those morally and ethically bankrupt ideologs in the GOP who continue to back Trump in spite of his evil toxicity are the very last ones we should allow to be pulling the strings from behind the curtain.
LikeLike
I worry that even if tRump is removed, or leaves, then we will probably get Cruz, who was second in the voting, and we be damned with the team of Cruz/Pence…a terrifying scenario that could also lead us to a place where there will be a White Christian Nation, with laws changed putting the gay etc. community back in the closet.
This makes it even more vital that Hillary is elected and that the Dems control the Senate…and maybe more.
LikeLike
Trump won’t be removed or drop it. He’s in it to win it.
He despises losers.
LikeLike
Good points, Jon.
My take is that if Donnie is elected – not, by the way, something I desire, whatever my criticisms of Clinton – we will essentially live under the US equivalent of a Regency, with Pence and other managers working the levers of government. Donnie will continue to perform as The Idiot Prince, the only thing he’s really capable of, while a hard right but “traditional” Republican regime actually runs things.
Think about it: distill him down to his essence, and Donnie is a tantrum-throwing child with ADHD. He’s constitutionally incapable of listening to, analyzing, weighing and arguing about complex political issues. He certainly unable to “empathize” or understand an adversary’s reasons, interests and the internal pressures/tensions they must answer to, something a good negotiator must be able to do. Can anyone actually imagine him sitting through a three-hour National Security Council meeting under acute crisis conditions?
In a way, it’s likely to be continuation of the Reagan/Bush-Baker, Bush II/Cheney dynamic, in which there was the public Face of power, and the behind-the-scene Hand of power.
No, if elected Donnie will probably just go on to being the Reality TV President, while Pence runs things. It’s a gross and unappetizing prospect, but a different one from “The Zombie Racist Fascists Are Coming!” narrative we’re getting.
LikeLike
Michael, I have a different vision of a Trump presidency. A vengeful, petty, thin-skinned man with the control of the military, the power to mobilize the National Guard, and control of the nuclear codes. I agree that he will have no interest in briefings that last longer than five minutes. A frightening prospect.
LikeLike
Dienne
The long game is to elect people who share your values from the city council to the state legislature to the Congress to the governor
Winning the presidency without changing the politicians in Congress and in state offices is not a viable strategy
LikeLike
Rachel Maddow just pointed out, very amusingly and dramatically, that all the Reps who have rushed in the last few days to distance themselves from his Khan remarks, have NOT mentioned that they will not vote for him, nor endorse him.
But there are still those who have been willing to speak out in NO uncertain terms like Bloomberg and Cuban…and the General.
LikeLike
Another good article….
The Psychopathology of Donald Trump
By Bill Blum – Does Donald Trump only say crazy things, or does he say crazy things because he actually is crazy?
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_psychopathology_of_donald_trump_20160731
LikeLike
When you belong to a party you pledge your support to that party, not to a certain person and no matter whom the PEOPLE choose to run you are required to support them. All of these typical all for one’s self leader/representatives that are in it for only the money and the continued rape of the American People for the special retirement that they get, who now want to distance themselves from Trump then they DO NOT deserve to be in office SO…even at the cost of losing control of the Houses they must be removed be it by Recall, Impeachment or vote them out AND kick all of them and anyone (Bushs’), out of the party…let them go 3rd patty…or what they truly are…Democrats in Republican clothing
LikeLike
Canada has started a #DumpDonaldEh campaign where the Canucks plan to send a cheque to #Trump asking him to opt out the #Elections. Join the Canucks and #BuyOutTrump here http://www.dumpdonaldeh.com
LikeLike