Parents in Kansas are disgusted with Governor Sam Brownback’s massive budget cuts. The cuts were inevitable after Brownback and the legislature enacted the biggest tax cuts in the state’s history in 2012 and 2013. They must have been following the Reagan playbook of trickle-down economics, but it didn’t work. The State Supreme Court ordered the legislature to enact an equitable and adequate plan to finance the public schools.
And now parents are gearing up to fight for their public schools.
The struggle over school funding in Kansas reached a new crisis point when the State Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Republican-dominated Legislature had not abided by its constitutional mandate to finance public schools equitably, especially poorer districts with less property wealth. The court, in an effort to force legislative action, reiterated a deadline that gave the state until June 30 to fix the problem or face a school shutdown.
The ruling exacerbated tensions over budgets enacted by Mr. Brownback and the Legislature that education officials say have led school districts to eliminate programs, lay off staff members or even shorten the school week….
Of even greater concern to many parents is a sense, they say, that the state leadership does not support the very concept of public education.
“People are saying, ‘This is not the Kansas I know,’ and ‘This is not the Republican Party I know,’” said Judith Deedy, who helped start the group Game On for Kansas Schools.
As in other states, the effect of reduced funding varies from one district to another. In poorer districts like Kansas City and Wichita, students are crammed into deteriorating buildings with bloated class sizes. One district in southeast Kansas, facing a budget shortfall, recently pared its school week to four days.
Parents who are Republicans feel betrayed by Governor Brownback and some plan to run against their incumbent representatives.
Educators are struggling to meet the needs of their students:
In Kansas City, school officials say they have been shortchanged by tens of millions of dollars over the past five years because the Legislature has not taken into account their needs when financing poorer districts like theirs. Ninety percent of the students in the Kansas City school district qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, and 40 percent are nonnative English speakers.
Cynthia Lane, the superintendent of schools in the Kansas City district, said preparations were underway in case schools are shut down, as the Supreme Court has threatened. Schools are usually busy during the summer months, with administrators and members of staff preparing for the upcoming academic year, she said. The first day of school is scheduled for Aug. 15.
“If we can’t pay bills, how do we keep our utilities on, how do we keep our security system on?” she said. “Folks are really frustrated and embarrassed that Kansas is the butt of jokes across the nation. He continues to say things are fine, when they are not fine.”
The Wichita School Board voted on May 18 to eliminate more than 100 jobs and to close an alternative high school, as part of efforts to trim about $18 million from the district’s budget.
At that meeting, Mike Rodee, the vice president of the board, blamed state officials for forcing budget cuts. “We need to look at all the people that are doing it to us,” he said at the school board meeting. “Our legislators, our government, our governor — we are the ones who are fighting to keep the schools alive, and they are fighting to close them.”
Some school principals say they are resigned to making do with what money they have. At Welborn Elementary School in Kansas City, classes are held in two aging buildings and students dash back and forth during the day. Teachers keep a watchful eye on them as they cross an active parking lot between the buildings.
“I don’t need much,” said Jennifer Malone, the principal, one recent afternoon. “I just want a building.”
Governor Brownback has called a special session of the legislature to enact a new funding formula. Just hope that he doesn’t fund the schools by cutting the universities or other public services.

When we cut funding for schools, we rob from our future. The children hurt the most.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kansas is where racial segregation of public schools led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling that integrated public schools — but the Kansas Establishment has never given up the fight against integration because education is the pathway to racial equality and integrations in all areas of social, business, and political life. Today’s so-called “reform” movement in education is really all about racial segregation. The first calls for “reform” in the form of vouchers arose immediately after the 1954 Supreme Court ruling on Brown v. Board of Education in which the Court declared that separate but equal was inherently unequal and ordered racial integration of the public schools. That ruling triggered “white flight” from public schools to private schools — but parents quickly realized that the tuition cost of private schools was more than they wanted to pay out-of-pocket. That realization led political and private resegregationists to the concoct the “reform” of vouchers, and to sell it to eager parents by deceptively marketing it then (and now) as merely giving parents free “choice.”
But the 1950’s voucher reform faded away when it became clear that because of school attendance boundaries no more than a few token blacks would be attending formerly all-white public schools. In 1972 when the Supreme Court finally ordered busing to end the ongoing de facto segregation, the reform movement rose from its grave and has been alive ever since then trying new tactics to restore racial segregation because it’s unlikely that the Court’s racial integration order can ever be reversed. When it became clear in the 1980’s that vouchers would never become widespread, the segregationists tried many other routes to restore racial segregation, and the most successful has been charter schools because charter schools can be sold to blithely unaware do-gooder billionaires as well as to unscrupulous profiteers who recognized charter schools as a way to divert vast amounts of tax money into their own pockets and into the pockets of supportive politicians at every level of government.
An essential part of the strategy to mask their underlying motives has been for segregationists to sell the public on the necessity for charter schools because public schools are allegedly “failing.” With all manner of “research” that essentially compares apples to oranges against foreign nations’ students, and with the self-fulfilling prophecy of dismal public school performance generated by drastic underfunding of public schools, and with condemnation of public school teachers based on statistically invalid student test scores, the segregationists are succeeding in resegregating education in America via what are basically private charter schools that are funded with public money.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A substantial number of Republicans speak with forked tongues about education–essential for the economy, but hey, there is too much waste and not enough economic payoff in our public colleges and universities.
Cut the arts and humanities programs, hire more adjuncts, do on-line courses, treat these facilities as holding companies for economically productive intellectual “talent.” Build out the sports programs to keep those alive and thriving.
For K-12, do about the same, cut the curriculum to basics — math and reading and science (but science free of “controversial” topics and theories). Cut social studies to civics/government, a splash of history and geography. Hire the minimal number of teachers you can get away with, increase the length of the school day and get more bang for fewer bucks, etc. “Accelerate” competition and eliminate underperforming schools by using this “theory of action.”
For K-12 some additional steps.
1. Measure the performance of each child, teacher, and school–not the operators of the schools. It does not matter if the operator is public or private, for-profit or non-profit, in-state or out-of state, place-based or virtual, religious or secular.
2. Embrace, accredit, and use public funds only for high performance schools with metrics similar to those at greatschools.org, thereby preserving enrollments for the top 20% of schools on state-wide tests and other measures (e.g., customer satisfaction surveys). Close underperforming schools annually.
3. Replicate and accelerate the expansion of schools, school models, and “seats” that deliver outstanding results. Allow franchise schools to flourish and take advantage of economies of scale.
4. Wrap all public funding into vouchers, tax dollars follow the child.
5. Prohibit union organizing and collective bargaining. Eliminate school boards in favor of appointed decision-makers and work-for-hire contracting.
5. Increase the number of programs that can be funded by investors seeking profit. Offer financial products such as pay-for-sucess-contracts and social impact bonds, especially for pre-school, English Language Learning, and students in need of special education.
These ideas have been adapted from bits and pieces of plans promoted by the US Department of Education, McKinsey & Company, networks of foundations devoted to privately operated schools and market-based education.
Republicans and allies are engaged in coordinated refusals to fund public education and to preserve public engagement in education except as “customers” of services.
Currently there are efforts to accelerate these and related prospects for education in Cincinnati Ohio, with much sweet talk about choice and serving underserved customers. The normalization of this orientation is evident in small details and in pending decisions. For example, when I wish to inquire about any aspect of Cincinnati Public Schools by email, the email heading is “Customer Service.” This little pleasantry ignores the important fact is that I am one of many citizens who are the actual employers of almost everyone in the school system. This is not just a matter of language (imported by PR people from Disney). It is by a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between a citizen and a customer, between a business seeking profits by pleasing customers and a civic institution created for the common good. This little transactional detail could also be a studied ideological choice to make market-based education appear to be perfectly natural, indeed friendly and responsive, free of all competitive impulses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“. . . the Reagan playbook of trickle-down economics, but it didn’t work.”
If I could correct the statement: “the Reagan playbook of trickle-down, ACTUALLY PISSED ON economics, WHICH EVEN HIS OWN VP CALLED VOODOO ECONOMICS, but it didn’t AND CAN’T EVER work.
LikeLike
It happened to have worked very well .Just as designed . But not for the 99%
LikeLiked by 2 people
YES. And that’s exactly what we should all be taking away from what is happening to our nation’s economy and the global economy thirty years after “Reaganomics” was/were first adopted.
LikeLike
I read a lot on the ed reform side- I think everyone should, because they’re running US public education- and I was baffled for a long time on why they never advocate for public schools in situations like that in Kansas. Because It isn’t just Kansas- it’s also Illinois and Pennsylvania. Thousands of paid ed reform advocates and hundreds of orgs and there’s never any mention of these state-wide funding debacles.
One would think “public education advocates” would occasionally lobby on behalf of public schools, right?
I now believe they’re silent on these issues because ed reform is a political coalition as much as it’s an “ed reform” coalition and they don’t want to alienate the Republicans in the coalition.
Brownback (and Rauner in Illinois and the Republicans in the PA statehouse) agree with them on “choice” and they prioritize choice over public schools so they don’t protest cuts to public schools.
I just saw this in action re: the Detroit legislation. The whole focus of ed reform was protecting “choice”- they don’t want charters regulated in Michigan- so they backed an absolute garbage Detroit “reform” bill because the top priority was “choice” and the bill protects choice.
EVERYTHING takes a back seat to “choice”, including funding whole state systems of education. It’s a political calculus, not an educational one.
LikeLike
Additionally, starving the public schools provides an even larger opening for charter schools to step in, since charters market themselves based on the “failure” of the public schools. Denying the public schools with basic resources is a sure-fire way to bring that about.
It’s called privateering and social vandalism,.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Utah has been really “good” at destroyed public education, as well. The legislators crowed this year about giving a 2.5% increase in the WPU this year. BUT, because the number of children in Utah is skyrocketing, the WPU for each student is LESS than it was last year (2015–$6600 per pupil, 2016–$6500).
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3987676-155/census-utah-still-last-for-spending
LikeLike
Governor Brownback is an ideologue who isn’t as smart as he thinks he is–he lacks even the insight to see the extent to which his programs have been a miserable failure in his state. Kansas is broke and it apparently shows everywhere: its road system is a mess, its credit rating is in the toilet because bond raters can’t see where the state will get the revenue to pay its bills, and now (surprise!) it can’t afford to educate its children.
I don’t mean to sound all conspiracy theory about this, but I do doubt it’s coincidence that Koch Industries has its headquarters in Wichita. Thomas Frank, definitely asked the write question with his book title.
So what is the matter with Kansas? Part of it that the state’s voters continue to elect halfwits like Brownback….
LikeLiked by 1 person
The right question, rather.
LikeLiked by 1 person
YES. I have known more than a few socially conservative people in Kansas who refuse knowledge of anything but a focus on “church” issues — abortion, gay marriage and stem cell research for example. They vote blindly and staunchly to the right simply to support their beliefs in these areas, and then let the conservatives they vote into power do what they please…
LikeLike