Jamaal A. Bowman is principal of a middle school in the Bronx in New York City. He knows the needs of his students, and he knows that none of their needs is addressed by annual testing. Thus he takes issue with Shavar Jeffries, the executive director of the pro-charter, pro-testing group called Democrats for Education Reform (DFER) and Education Reform Now (ERN).
Bowman notes that Jeffries is sure about what to do to reform education but he never taught school.
“What is most damaging about our test and punish system and why Jefferies’ support is baffling, is our continued overemphasis on English Language Arts and Mathematics. As a result, Science, the arts, project based learning, and Montessori classrooms have all been reduced or removed from the public school curriculum. Consequently, aesthetic learning, and other essential skills needed to truly compete in a “21st century global economy” have been greatly compromised.
“Again, Mr. Jeffries has never taught a day in his life. If he had he might argue for the importance of early childhood programs in low-income communities. He would know that proficiency on standardized tests in grades 3-8 does not contribute to nor correlate with college success. He might also argue for portfolio-based assessments that facilitate deeper learning and better align with the collaboration, communication, creativity, and critical thinking skills required for college and career success. In the future, I would encourage Mr. Jeffries to speak with real educators on the ground in district public schools. We work with children every day. We can tell him what needs to be done for our children and communities. Annual testing is not even on the list.
“We must have real conversations about the most important factor to learning in our schools —teachers and teaching. Let us design a school system anchored in multiple intelligences that nurture the innate brilliance and joy for learning in every child. Let us work together to advocate for a truly individualized, Whole Child approach to schooling. Our goal must be to ensure the health, prosperity, and happiness of every single child, so that we can fulfill the promise of our democracy. Mr. Jefferies and his colleagues at DFER, if they truly want what’s best for our public schools, must expand their thinking about life, learning, and most of all, children.”

If you want to know why know-nothing Jeffries thinks the way he does, look at his income and where it comes from. There are individuals out there, like Jeffries, that will believe anything for the money. What kind of person is Jeffries?
For an answer look no further than this piece in Psychology Today about the charming psychopath:
“Psychopaths show a stunning lack of concern for the effects their actions have on others, no matter how devastating these might be. They may appear completely forthright about the matter, calmly stating that they have no sense of guilt, are not sorry for the ensuing pain, and that there is no reason now to be concerned.”
“Many of the characteristics displayed by psychopaths are closely associated with a profound lack of empathy and inability to construct a mental and emotional “facsimile” of another person. They seem completely unable to “get into the skin” of others, except in a purely intellectual sense.”
“With their powers of imagination in gear and beamed on themselves, psychopaths appear amazingly unfazed by the possibility—or even by the certainty—of being found out. When caught in a lie or challenged with the truth, they seldom appear perplexed or embarrassed—they simply change their stories or attempt to rework the facts so they appear to be consistent with the lie. The result is a series of contradictory statements and a thoroughly confused listener.
“And psychopaths seem proud of their ability to lie. When asked if she lied easily, one woman laughed and replied, “I’m the best. I think it’s because I sometimes admit to something bad about myself. They think, well, if she’s admitting to that she must be telling the truth about the rest.”
Reading this piece is like watching an on stage profile of everyone inside the corporate public education reform movement. I wonder if there has ever been a movement that has gathered this many psychopaths together under before under one circus tent all working with one common goal — profit, profit, profit and control the thinking of future generations of children.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199401/charming-psychopath
LikeLike
Wow that description really describes some of the people in the charter school/ pro-privatization industry.
There are also many people — including those who sits on the board of the SUNY Charter Institute — who are given prestige and money to rationalize their own laziness in not actually doing the oversight that might end their cushy jobs. Keep quiet, don’t rock the boat, you will be ‘taken care of’.
In an economy where the middle class can’t get ahead while a small group of individuals earn over 1 BILLION dollars in a single year, it’s very easy to understand the terror of those people not to rock the boat. What’s does the suffering of those unworthy at-risk kids matter when your own family needs your salary to pay for private college tuition, music lessons, a nice house for your own children? All you need to do is look the other way and make sure never to question what happens when charters find a kid unworthy of their school.
LikeLike
Sounds like David Coleman.
LikeLike
Yes. Sounds like most if not all of the key players in the corporate public education reform movement. For instance, Michelle Rhee, Scott Walker, Eva Moskowitz, Andrew Cuomo, Campbell Brown, John King, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lloyd Lofthouse: thank you for the link to an excellent piece.
John Merrow on Michelle Rhee:
[start]
She was determined not to let anything get in her way. “What I am is somebody who is focused on the end result that I think needs to happen,” she told the PBS NewsHour in September, 2007. “If there are rules standing in the way of that, I will question those rules. I will bend those rules.”
[end]
Link: http://takingnote.learningmatters.tv/?p=6232
Later in the piece:
[start]
Rhee categorically rejected this interpretation in an interview in September 2011 when I asked her if she had created a ‘climate of fear.’ “No! Absolutely not!,” she exclaimed, adding, “Was there a lot of pressure to improve student achievement levels in the district? Absolutely. A hundred percent. There was a lot of pressure to do that. But I think that somehow that making the leap from that to and therefore you added to it, it’s crazy.”
Perhaps inadvertently, the rookie Chancellor seems to have provided principals with two motives to cheat, a carrot–the possibility of large bonuses–and a stick–the threat of being fired.
[end]
And in note#6:
[start]
Rhee’s biographer, Richard Whitmire, has characterized her as ‘a zealot’ who believes in the absolute rightness of what she is doing. His book is The Bee Eater.
She also declared–proudly–that she was not inclined to look back. Shortly after she fired a principal she had appointed just a few weeks earlier (replacing one she had fired), I asked her if she had any regrets about her actions. “I’m a very unusual person in that, in my entire life, I don’t have any regrets. I’m a person without regret. Now, are there things that I could have done differently? And if I had to rewrite it, you know, I would have, you know, done it with a smarter way or whatnot, yeah. There are absolutely things that I could have done better. But regrets? No.” She said that in December 2007. Would she say that today?
[end]
Beginning to sound like the folks described in the linked article?
If the shoe fits…
😡
LikeLike
The shoe built for psychopaths fits Rhee perfectly.
LikeLike
As always, thank you Jamaal Bowman….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Loved this one…So true. crossposted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Jamaal-Bowman-The-Mis-Edu-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Arts_Education_Language_Learning-160513-538.html
with this comment which has embedded links back to this site.
This is a great tragedy, but even the art of fiction writing is being lost.
Teachers have to follow the CC script; the puppet masters (The Educational Industrial Complex) who control education do not want kids to examine the great thoughts from the past, behaviors and values PASSED DOWN IN FICTION, in stories.
Here is the truth: Tom Loveless: Teaching Fiction Has Declined Since 2011, Likely Because of Common Core: “The Common Core standards recommend that teachers spend 50% of reading time on fiction and 50% on informational text in grades K-8. In high school, the standards propose a division of 30% fiction-70% informational text. When English teachers and members of the public complained about the downgrading of fiction, the CCSS promoters insisted that they referred to the entire curriculum, not just to English. But fiction is not typically taught in science, math, or social studies classes (and when it is taught in social studies classes, it has a good purpose).
“Where did these proportions come from? They are drawn directly from NAEP’s guidelines to assessment developers about the source of test questions. The NAEP guidelines were never intended as instructions for teachers about how much time to devote to any genre of reading.
“No nation in the world, to my knowledge, directs teachers about the proportion of time to devote to fiction or non-fiction. This is a bizarre recommendation.The decline has occurred since 2011, as implementation of Common Core intensified across the nation. The shrinkage of time for teaching fiction was equally large in both fourth and eighth grades. It seems reasonable to conclude that the Common Core standards are causing a decline in teaching fiction”.
Submitted on Friday, May 13, 2016 at 9:21:44 PM
LikeLike