The Maryland State Board of Education voted to make PARCC the state’s high school graduation test. The passing score now will be a 3 on a scale of 1-5, but it will rise to a 4 in four years.
Meanwhile the State Commissioner of Education on Rhode Island, Ken Wagner, decided to drop PARCC as a graduation requirement because he knew the failure rate would be staggering. He said he didn’t want to penalize students for the system’s “failure to get them to high standards.”
Nobody mentioned that PARCC’s passing score is absurdly high and will never be reached by about half of all students.
The Maryland state board violated the first rule of educational testing: Tests should be used only for the purpose for which they were designed. PARCC was not designed to be a high school graduation test. It was designed to test mastery of the Common Core. Its passing marks were set so high that most of the 24 states that adopted PARCC have now dropped it, and only six states and D.C. still use it.
What will Maryland do with the thousands of students who will never earn a high school diploma? Did anyone think about that? You can be certain that most of them will be students with disabilities, English language learners, and children who live in high poverty. There is one loophole: students can create a project that is approved by their teachers and administrators.
The only objection to the new Maryland plan came from the ACLU, which said that there was no evidence that the PARCC raises achievement. Read that again slowly. No test raises achievement. Tests measure how well students do on a standardized test. They don’t improve students’ ability to pass standardized test.
Down the rabbit-hole in Maryland, where the legislature recently voted to approve vouchers, assuring that students may go to religious schools that teach creationism, orthodox Judaism, Catholic doctrine, and Islam.
Liz Bowie writes in the Baltimore Sun:
The new standard means students will not be required to achieve what is considered the national passing score until the 2019-2020 school year.
Thousands of students across the state will struggle to meet even that lowered standard. In 2015, 42 percent of Maryland students who took the Algebra I exam and 39 percent of those who took the English 10 test scored less than a three.
If the standard had been in effect last year, more than half of Baltimore County’s students would not have passed the math test and 35 percent would not have passed the English test.
In Baltimore, 70 percent would not have passed the math exam and more than half would not have passed the English exam.
The Maryland State Education Association, which represents most of the state’s teachers, has not taken a position on the draft regulations. Cheryl Bost, the group’s vice president, said that while the union is “pleased there is a transition plan,” teachers are concerned about whether they will be able to give students the individual attention they need to pass the exams.
Thousands of students, education officials say, will be taking the tests multiple times to try to pass, and many will likely use a loophole that allows students to demonstrate their knowledge by doing a project that is approved by their teacher and other administrators.
With such a large percentage of students failing the exams, teachers will have many more students doing projects who they must work with individually.
Baltimore County Superintendent Dallas Dance said he supports the phase-in approach.
But Bebe Verdery, the ACLU’s Maryland education director, objects to the high-stakes tests. Many states have repealed the tests, she said, because evidence does not show that they increase achievement.
“If the state board is going to persist in having high-stakes graduation exams, it is imperative they provide and guarantee high-quality instruction so that students have the opportunity to pass the test,” Verdery said.

Higher standards and more rigor are all we’re getting from the ed reform “movement” who utterly dominate government:
“We should certainly be reflective about the results, but the clear takeaway is that we have more work to do, particularly in supporting the students who are struggling the most. Higher standards are the first step. More rigor is the next step.”
Nothing concrete on support, as usual. The promised “support” for the higher standards will never arrive.
Public school leaders must know this by now, though. It’s been 15 years. Why don’t they demand the support be supplied as a condition of adopting an ed reform project? Support first or no deal.
That would seem to me to be just common sense, considering the track record. Political leaders in ed reform always renege on the promised “supports”. Always. Maybe we need better, savvier advocates, or more of them.
http://educationpost.org/statement-by-peter-cunningham-on-12th-grade-naep-scores/
LikeLike
Marylanders= make sure to thank Martin O’Malley for his neo-liberal appointments. And in the spirit of bi-partisanship – Gov. Larry Hogan as well!
LikeLike
Yes, Mark. It is a bi-partisan onslaught. There’s at least one dyed-in-the-wool TFA alum on the MSDE board, Laura Weeldryer, who helped push charters into Baltimore City under the last Republican Gov. Erlich , but appointed to the State Board until 2019 by Democrat Gov. O’Malley on his way out of office.
http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDe/stateboard/Board_Members.html
Republican Gov. Hogan is doubling-down, appointing Andy Smarick, of Bellweather Partners, (search this blog for posts about Smarick and Bellweather) and Fordham’s Chester Finn (“primary focus is reforming primary and secondary schooling”)
http://marylandpublicschools.org/press/05_19_2015_a.html
According to the MSDE Board’s press release ,this still has to be published in the Maryland Register, and comments will have to be taken “over the summer” when they hope exhausted students and teachers will be on vacation.
http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/press/04_27_2016.html
So this is not a done deal. Baltimore County Schools students deserve better.
LikeLike
The Progressive, on this Board.
http://www.progressive.org/news/2015/09/188296/maryland-meet-your-state-board-education
LikeLike
Correction, all of Maryland’s public school students deserve better! It’s not just Baltimore County Public Schools, it’s state-wide. I’m again stunned by the edu-prenuers reach – may it always exceed their grasp.
LikeLike
I hate to raise a practical issue, but 32 states have cut funding for public schools under ed reform leadership at the state and national level.
It will be more difficult to raise standards with less funding, particularly because ed reformers are also pushing huge ed tech purchases.
It’s almost like they’re setting up public schools to fail.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chiara: forgive the quibble, but your last sentence has a few too many words at the beginning.
IMHO, it should read: “They’re setting up public schools to fail.”
Thank you for your patience.
😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sure all of these “details” and “distractions” can be solved by saying “plus/and!” and “outputs, not inputs” a lot.
Nothing another round of business-seminar speak won’t solve.
LikeLike
“Meanwhile the State Commissioner of Education on Rhode Island, Ken Wagner, decided to drop PARCC as a graduation requirement because he knew the failure rate would be staggering. He said he didn’t want to penalize students for the system’s “failure to get them to high standards.”
The same Ken Wagner that foisted meaningless testing on New York!!! These education policy wonks know no shame. Educational malfeasance.
LikeLike
This is sick.
Sent from my iPad
>
LikeLike
It may be sick but it sure makes some folks a lot of jack!
LikeLike
I think what we really need is higher standards for elected officials.
…or at least some standards. As it is now, we don’t seem to have any at all.
LikeLike
should have said “higher standards for electing officials”
LikeLike
Hailing form the once great state of MD, I will tell you that I am NOT shocked. We are in such close proximity to the DC think tanks and spin Dr.’s. While I do believe that children should graduate high school being able to read, write and perform basic math skills, I do NOT believe that Algebra should have to be taken and mastered in order to graduate. The other thing about the “bridge” project….they have to fail PARCC twice before being allowed the project. Thank you Finn & Smarick for your advice on this matter! I must say that I think every person pushing for these idiotic tests needs to actually sit down and take the full ELA10 and ALG I PARCC and score a 4 before being allowed to push policy on children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If they don’t pass, they should be required to immediately resign from office and forfeit any public pension that they had accrued.
LikeLike
As poorly designed as PARCC is, calling the tests higher standards is about as accurate as calling endless test prep rigor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Where’s the choice? There is none. In China, most athletes are drafted at a young age and then spend the rest of their youth living in dorms and practicing their sport. In the United States, the old republic the Founding Fathers created gave us all the power of choice in what we want to do with our lives. If we wanted to work from a young age to compete and become an Olympic athlete or try out for the big leagues in football, basketball, baseball, etc. then that was our choice.
My next door neighbor has three children. His oldest son, who is still a child, is out in the front driveway shooting baskets for hours at a time. That is his choice. No one is making him do it. Sometimes, he drags his mother or father out to shoot baskets with him.
The same applies to school. The traditional public schools used to offer children the choice of what education they want—there were the required courses, the electives and then an offering of student activities and clubs outside of the academic classroom. Not learning was a choice. Not reading was a choice. Going to college was a choice. Not graduating from high school was a choice.
But the autocratic, for profit, opaque and often fraudulent corporate public education reformers are taking away the choice of being a child and a student. If a child, for whatever reason, decides he is not going to do homework or read books, that was his choice. When I was teaching for thirty years (1975-2005), I had students who refused to do the home work or classwork. Often, when asked why, the child would reply that he didn’t need to do it because he was going to join the family business. For instance, repairing cars/trucks, mowing lawns, cleaning pools, working in the family restaurant, installing windows, building houses, in construction, painting houses, etc. Some students replied that they hated to read, because we all know that most if not all of the students who fall behind and do poorly on these high stakes tests were not introduced to books by age two or three by their parents and or guardians.
Now there is no choice. The corporate hacks that worship the god of greed at the alter of avarice are taking away those choices. There is only the abusive assembly line of the corporate gulag schools that test children relentlessly for all children stating as young as five or six. Our children are losing their freedom to choose the life they want to live or their circumstances influence them to live. The environments of poverty, middle class or wealth creates circumstances that cause children to make different choices. The worse environment to grow up in is one of poverty. I know. I was born into a family living in poverty and our parents, both high school drop outs, worked hard to escape that poverty and join the blue-collar middle class. The first house our parents bought had a roof and tar paper for walls with no doors or windows or finished inside walls—just open framing even for the one bathroom with a toilet and sink but no cabinets. Their dream was to own a home and the only home they could afford was one that was not finished. Our mother baked cakes and worked in a laundry. Our dad worked in construction operating heavy equipment.
As a child, I loved to read but hated school so I didn’t do much work. It was my choice as a child to do just enough school work to pass most of my classes with D’s, and I barely graduated from high school with a 0.95 GPA. It was my choice to join the U.S. Marines as a volunteer. No one drafted me and forced me into the military. After Vietnam and the Marines, it was my choice after making another choice to go to college on the G.I. Bill, and it took me five years to earn a BA in journalism. M first two years was in a community college, and I barely scraped by with a 2.0 GPA because most of the classes didn’t interest me. But I finished the last three years with a 3.95 GPA in my journalism major — that interested me.
I was and still am a horrible test taker. I don’t do well on tests. If I was a child today, the results of these highs takes tests would have made sure I never graduated from high school and I would have grown up feeling like a failure instead of a child that had choices. These high stakes tests are a sledge hammer that will destroy the lives of millions of children. Will they grow up angry and become the perfect recruits for a terrorist organization like ISIS? Will they be destined to fill prison cells as the the U.S. stays number one in the world with the most citizen in prison—today we have more than 2 million Americans locked up? How many will end up living their lives behind bars in an America that is an oligarchy instead of the republic the Founding Fathers gave us to hold onto?
LikeLike
What does Maryland plan to do with all of its future unemployable non-high school graduates?
Oh, wait, silly me. That’s what private prisons are for.
LikeLike
So very, very sadly true.
LikeLike
Dienne and ciedie aech: with a heavy heart—
I must concur.
😱
LikeLike
If Maryland, which I formerly thought had a population, with educational and professional success, similar to most states, begins to show massive failures (measured by test scores), does it mean that Maryland’s voters were stupid in electing their politicians?
Or, are Marylanders inadequate intellectually? …. Maybe it’s one and the same.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, we don’t get to elect school board President at the state level. Appointed position. We have to live with poor decisions because I assume we are thought to be dumber than dirt about what is good/not good for our children.
LikeLike
Lisa-
My sympathies. My state was egregiously gerrymandered, making a vote pointless.
LikeLike
The more things change, the more they remain the same.
Z. 1962
How many roads must a man(or woman) walk down
Before you call him a man(or woman) ?
How many seas must a white dove sail
Before she sleeps in the sand ?
Yes, how many times must the cannon balls fly
Before they’re forever banned ?
Yes, how many years can a mountain exist
Before it’s washed to the sea ?
Yes, how many years can some people exist
Before they’re allowed to be free ?
Yes, how many times can a man(or woman) turn his/her head
Pretending he(or she) just doesn’t see ?
Yes, how many times must a man(or woman) look up
Before he/she can see the sky ?
Yes, how many ears must one man(or woman) have
Before he/she can hear people cry ?
Yes, how many deaths will it take till he/she knows
That too many people have died ?
LikeLike
“The Maryland State Board of Education voted to make PARCC the state’s high school graduation test.”
Dipsh. . s (oops better not complete that one.)
LikeLike
“The Maryland state board violated the first rule of educational testing: Tests should be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.”
Doesn’t matte what they were designed for, PARCC RESULTS ARE STILL COMPLETELY INVALID. Can’t get around that fact! And if you know anyone who has please let me know-been looking for almost two decades now and haven’t see anything, not even the testing bible addresses the invalidities involved that Wilson proved in 1997.
LikeLike
2. A major epistemological mistake is that we attach, with great importance, the “score” of the student, not only onto the student but also, by extension, the teacher, school and district. Any description of a testing event is only a description of an interaction, that of the student and the testing device at a given time and place. The only correct logical thing that we can attempt to do is to describe that interaction (how accurately or not is a whole other story). That description cannot, by logical thought, be “assigned/attached” to the student as it cannot be a description of the student but the interaction. And this error is probably one of the most egregious “errors” that occur with standardized testing (and even the “grading” of students by a teacher).
6. Having shown the invalidity, and therefore the unreliability, of the whole process Wilson concludes, rightly so, that any result/information gleaned from the process is “vain and illusory”.
Good thing the “whole process” doesn’t refer to the
mark [grade/test score] of secondary education. How do the
pre-certification tests become a “mark-maker”, instead of another
description of the interaction?
LikeLike
Not sure of what you are asking NoBrick. Please restate your question (I’m a little “thick” still today after getting a cortisone shot in my lower back earlier)
LikeLike
What makes college tests valid and reliable? How does the
sum of college test scores become a description of the student
(college degree)?
“That description cannot, by logical thought, be “assigned/attached” to the student as it cannot be a description of the student but the interaction.”
If college tests are the “real thing”, why not use the “proper theory”
of information management, as the template for K-12?
LikeLike
“If college tests are the “real thing”” Well they’re not the ‘real thing’ either, eh!
“why not use the “proper theory”
What is ‘proper theory’. I’ve not heard of that.
LikeLike
Diane, the legislature wants vouchers. The SBOE makes passing PARCC a grad requirement anf sets a high cut score. Anyone in Md trying encourage kids to go out the public school door into private- voucher paid for schools?
LikeLike
Wondering where all the union leadership was during all this.
LikeLike
I served on the MD HS Assessment Task Force in the mid-1990s when Dr. Nancy Grasmick was leading the State. To Dr. Grasmick’s credit– and the State Board’s credit as well– the purchase of an off-the-shelf test was quickly rejected. Why? Because the State Department’s test designers and Task Force members all realized that any norm-refereced assessment would necessarily yield a bell-curve that would result in 50% of the students scoring “below average”. That meant that our committee needed to develop a criterion referenced test to determine if a student was “ready to work or ready to go to college or both”… When we looked at the skills sought by employers, we ultimately concluded we needed to develop a means of measuring soft skills that defied a pencil and paper assessment… Two decades later this all seems to have been forgotten.
BTW, if you want to see a state that is getting it right in terms of graduation standards, look at Vermont. http://education.vermont.gov/pbgr The only thing good about ESSA’s giving states leeway in defining how they will measure performance is that States like VT won’t be placed in a straitjacket. Too bad other states aren’t moving away from standardization!
LikeLike
This asinine policy was brought to you at least in part by Checker Finn & Andy Smarick. Hogan ran in part on an anti-Common Core platform – and then promptly put these two [fill in your own choice of words here]’s to the State BoE.
A lot of people who voted Hogan (of which I was not one) are feeling pretty betrayed right now.
LikeLike