Professor Les Perelman at MIT created a “babel generator” with his students that can produce elegant essays that are gibberish.


Fred Klonsky offers examples here, as well as the link to the babel generator.


Try your luck at writing an essay that will fool the computer. It isn’t hard.


A reader recently submitted one of Shakespeare’s sonnets to the grading machine, and it got a low score. Or so he claimed.


Most PARCC exams will be computer-scored.


Here is an essay that scored a 6, which is very high-performing:





Analyze an Issue Topic: In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.




Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.



In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position




Your Answer:




Careers with corroboration has not, and in all likelihood never will be compassionate, gratuitous, and disciplinary. Mankind will always proclaim noesis; many for a trope but a few on executioner. a quantity of vocation lies in the study of reality as well as the area of semantics. Why is imaginativeness so pulverous to happenstance? The reply to this query is that knowledge is vehemently and boisterously contemporary. Benevolence, usually by confrontation, might enthrall career. If nearly all of the sanctions assure a concession of the swiftly or tantalizingly enthusiastic rejoinder, the consummate cognition can be more multifariously provoked. Additionally, an orbital is not the only thing simulation reacts; it also spins at knowledge. Our personal countenance on the accusation we diagnose can scrupulously be a circumspection. Be that as it may, knowing that inducement can be the oration, most of the avocations to my inspection belie toxic agreements. In my philosophy class, all of the appendages by our personal altruist of the inquiry we expedite allocate circumscriptions which advocate with accessions but reprove boundary that should potently be a aggregation and abandon performances for convulsions. Imagination which is contemptibly in how much we adhere assimilates melange of our personal advance to the administration we adjure as well. a quarrel will erroneously be a lamentation on the authentication, not an escapade. In my experience, none of the salvers by our personal amplification at the affirmation we authorize masticate consideration that journeys but incline. an abundance of vision changes plethora for careers. As I have learned in my literature class, humanity will always foretell calling. Even though the brain counteracts a gamma ray to veracity, the same pendulum may catalyze two different neutrinoes with the promptly erroneous contentment. Although the same neuron may receive two different brains, radiation processes orbitals of speculations on an appetite. The plasma is not the only thing a gamma ray oscillates; it also transmits neutrinoes for torpor at the authorization by imaginativeness. The assassination of imagination changes a plethora of calling. The less extraneous respondents articulate precincts, the more an explanation amplifies those in question. Irreverence, normally on the propagandist, exhibits career. As a result of culminating, all of the circumstances respond equally with careers. Also, vocation to accumulations will always be an experience of humankind. In my theory of knowledge class, some of the postulates of my aborigine sublimate embroideries by the search for semiotics. Still yet, armed with the knowledge that privation can be a conveyance or attests, many of the allocations for my exile ascertain recrudescence and agree. In my philosophy class, almost all of the celebrations at our personal demonstration by the avocation we induce forsake amygdalas which attain the amygdala with the civilization on excess that tantalizes accumulations or implore tyroes. Imagination which pledges subjugation may rivetingly be provocation or is faltering but not speculating of my appendage also. a situational augur feigns the people involved, not resourcefulness. Our personal congregation to the affront we stipulate should be the accession. The sedulously despicable imagination changes a quantity of noesis. The squalidly but drowsily ashen masochism, usually with the search for literature, circumscribes knowledge. Noesis which will effectively be an axiom changes a frugal knowledge. Additionally, while the neuron for respondum spins, the same brain may process two different orbitals at inducement. In my reality class, none of the accusations on my agriculturalist implore mournfully but slightly penal advocates but sublimate multitude. Still yet, armed with the knowledge that validation is pedantic, substantiated, and inflexible, all of the queries by our personal respondent with the assimilationist we edify commandeer the people involved of the countenance. In my experience, most of the tropes to our personal report for the casuistry we recount report. The explanation on career can virtually be irreverence that howls and annotates performances which accede at our personal scrutinization to the apprentice we command too. an authentication may be scrupulousness, not ligature by orators. Our personal organism with the altruist we embolden laments state-of-affairs that is prototypical yet somehow fecund. By the fact that all of the probes are bemoaned for imagination, disrupting interlopers culminate to the same extent on cognition. Knowledge has not, and undoubtedly never will be scrupulous yet somehow agreed. However, armed with the knowledge that an amanuensis with exposures advances, all of the injunctions for my circumscription ruminate. By the fact that disparaging reprovers are incensed at knowledge, most of the circumscriptions protrude too by cognition. Vision will always be a part of human society. Noesis is the most precarious agriculturalist of human life. As I have learned in my semantics class, human society will always enlightenment career. Interference emits simulation to transmit plasmas. Despite the fact that the same pendulum may counteract two different gamma rays to diagnoses, the neuron receives interference. Gravity of dissemination for the assassin is not the only thing a neutrino inverts; it also processes pendulums at humanity to noesis. The sooner accumulations undertake salvers, the sooner an adjuration diverges. As a result of accounting, most of the concurrences which rationalize the abominable augur allude too by imagination. Calling has not, and undoubtedly never will be aggravating in the way we encounter mortification but delineate the reprimand that should be inclination. Nonetheless, armed with the knowledge that the analysis augurs stealth with propagandists, almost all of the utterances on my authorization journey. Since sanctions are performed at knowledge, a quantity of vocation can be more gaudily inspected. Knowledge will always be a part of society. Vocation is the most presumptuously perilous assassination of mankind.