Peter Greene writes that the Success Academy charter chain proves definitively that charters are not public schools.
It is a private business funded with public tax dollars.
They have previously gone to court to argue that they are not accountable to any elected officials or the state government itself. And now their team of lawyers has sent out a memo to remind staffers that they are not in any way accountable to anybody outside Success Academy walls.
Politico got its hands on that memo. It’s the latest in a string of damage control attempts at the charter chain, which has suffered one bad PR moment after another, from a got-to-go list of students to be forced out , to video of teacher cruelty to a child. They’ve drawn the unwelcome attention of veteran journalist John Merrow. Eva Moskowitz, who is paid more to head up her private chain of 11,000 students than Carmen Farina is paid to manage the entire New York City school system, has been ineffective in beating back the problems, and mostly seems alternately confused and outraged that she has to bother. Moskowitz is a woman who always seems one bad lapse of impulse control away from barking, “Do you know who I am!!??” Most recently the chain hired the same PR firm that has tried to paper over the Flint water crisis.
The legal memo that Peter Greene refers to says the following, according to Politico, where it was first published:
Under the header “top 20 mistakes schools make,” the advisory team writes that one of them is “providing information to lawyers/press/electeds/government reps.”
“Leaders must call advisory if these individuals are requesting information or are in their buildings. Lawyers and press/government may appear to be asking simple questions, but there can be broader implications,” the document reads. “Leaders must not provide sensitive information, such as demographic info or projected enrollment, to third parties without consulting with advisory.”
Stefan Friedman, a spokesman for Success, told POLITICO that what the memo outlines is important to keep staff on the same page. “With 11,000 scholars and 1,700 staff/faculty, these common sense procedures ensure we have a coordinated way for responding to inquiries from important members of the community,” he said in a statement.
The memo also specifically instructs school leaders not to allow parents to become the sources of leaks to journalists or government officials.
“Letting parents get away with threats to go to the press/police/elected official” is listed as number eight on the list of twenty mistakes.
“If a parent makes this threat, contact advisory. Advisory can help diffuse this situation,” the memo reads. “But we cannot let parents ‘get away’ with these threats. Feel confident in pushing back on these and telling parents that threats are not a productive way to resolve conflict or build the relationship….”
Staffers should not, according to the memo, take videos of “scholars in crisis.”
Teachers should not “physically restrain” students, except when they are in imminent danger.
And employees should not prevent students from using the bathroom, according to the memo.
Success’s legal team also instructs staff to keep clear documentation of student suspensions. Suspensions have been particularly publicly contentious for the network, following reports that Success suspends children as young as Kindergarten and that it suspends students at a higher rate than district schools or other charters do.
There are many other reasons to recognize that Success Academy charters are not public schools. Public schools are not permitted to close for a few hours or the day to send their students to a political rally. But Success Academy does it whenever its leader wishes. If a principal of a public school closed for the day and put students and parents on a bus to Albany to lobby for funding, she/he would be fired.

Yet another organization that thinks PR is it’s main problem. Eva Moskowitz appears to be as clueless TFA’s Wendy Kopp.
“Scholars in Crisis”
Scholars in Crisis
Kids who are kids
Refuse to be mices
At Moskowitz’ bids
LikeLike
“In Moskowitz vids” also works
LikeLike
———————————————————————
MEMO:
“MISTAKE NO. 8:
“Letting parents get away with threats to go to the press / police / elected official …
“If a parent makes this threat, contact Advisory. Advisory can help diffuse this situation,
“But we cannot let parents ‘get away’ with these threats. Feel confident in pushing back on these and telling parents that threats are not a productive way to resolve conflict or build the relationship.”
———————————————————————
Okay, I’ll bite.
When Eva — and it’s Eva who wrote this — says, “But we cannot let parents ‘get away’ with these threats. Feel confident in pushing back on these … ”
… what exactly does she mean by that?
Exactly how will Eva intimidate into silence parents who are about to share their problems with the outside world?
Threats to expel the child?
Threats to sue the parents for slander or libel?
For those who already have shared their problems with the outside world, how will Eve punish or retaliate against them for their traitorous calumny?
Expel the child?
Sue the parents for libel, so as to silence other parents who may be thinking of speaking out?
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2016/03/8594332/memo-success-academy-lawyers-warn-staff-mistakes?utm_source=Master+Mailing+List&utm_campaign=b536739e44-Rise_Shine_Another_NYC_student_is_caught3_23_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_23e3b96952-b536739e44-69986885
Unfortunately, we live in a free society, so those parents have a Constitutionally protected right to say whatever they want — good, bad, or indifferent — about their schools.
Recall how Eva made good on her threat —- “We cannot let parents get away with these threats” — last December?
To one parent who spoke out in John Merrow’s piece, Eva released that parent’s child’s private school records. Even though she knew this was and is highly illegal and a violation of FERPA privacy protection, she did it anyway, because she knew that it would make other parents think twice about doing so themselves.
This is a truly vicious woman.
LikeLike
What kind Of person males threats like these? Answer: Running scared to protect awful self and fascist policies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I urge viewers of this blog to read this posting in conjunction with the one that follows entitled “Parents Call on Governor Cuomo to Increase Oversight of Success Academy Charters.”
Bottom line: if someone for a “better education for all” had written the document in question (even as parody) it would be loudly denounced by the charter/privatization crowd as a vicious fabrication worthy of the worst propaganda mills of history.
IMHO, it can be read as nothing less than a stunning confirmation that the leading edge of corporate education reform imbibes deeply—and intoxicatingly—at the fount of worst pedagogical and management practices.
But you have to admire their undying love of John Steinbeck:
“Man is the only kind of varmint sets his own trap, baits it, then steps in it.”
😎
LikeLike
If a member of the DOE’s Committee on Special Education “shows up late, does not act professionally, does not listen, you must document it … and escalate,” the memo reads.
And planned strategies for “escalating” intimidation. So who is going to have a video recorder present to document when a DOE official on Special Education “is not listening?” The lists of do NO’s are all shaped by an intent to litigate litigate anyone who questions EVA’s policies and practices, including staff who “leak” information.
LikeLike
Watch the video BELOW as Eva lets down her guard a bit, and reveals her hostility towards any type of regulation or oversight, as that is “strangling” her schools — in this case, she smears what she pejoratively describes as the “Special Ed. Compliance Machine,” and the adults who are part of this. She claims that unlike her, those adults don’t really care about the “special ed” children about whom they are supposed to care.
This 25th Anniversary TFA event happened just prior to the Charlotte Dial abuse video, but after the Got-to-Go List controversy.
Eva’s clearly angry about the reports about her schools failing to meet the needs of “Special Ed.” kids, and instead, kicking them out.
In responding to those charges, Eva claims victim status, and insinuates that those critics don’t really care about Special Needs kids,
whereas she, of course, does. To that, she claims that there exists a “Special Ed. Compliance Machine” is “strangling” Success Academy schools.
She wants current policies protecting and looking out for special needs children changed to her liking.
God forbid that should happen. (CAPITAL are mine.)
( 11:02 – 11:50 )
( 11:02 – 11:50 )
EVA MOSKOWITZ: “We think that we’re not really going to make the dream of TFA come true until we change the public policies in this country. And I believe that educators don’t have enough of a voice at the table on those public policies.
“You know, because you’ve been in the classroom, or because you’ve led a school … you know that it’s not just a question of resources. Resources, of course, are helpful. You know it’s about teacher training. It’s about ‘leader training.’
“It’s about not being STRANGLED BY REGULATIONS THAT are really not driven, or ARE NOT REALLY ABOUT CHILDREN. If you take the…
— (sarcastic tone & facial expression, waving her arms)
“the ‘SPECIAL ED. COMPLIANCE MACHINE,’ it’s NOT REALLY ABOUT SERVING THAT SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD, so there’s a lot
of work to do on the educational front… ”
——————-
She just throws that cheap shot out there, but doesn’t elaborate or explain what the-hell she means. She then plays a slick propaganda video for Success Academy.
What exactly is she referring to, anyway?
Eva absolutely despises he fact that school officials are legally required to identify which children have Special Ed. disabilities, and then must provide them with extra, targeted, and yes expensive support– including smaller class sizes, extra classroom aide, an I.E.P. with a team that meets regularly to monitor whether or not the I.E.P. is being implemented.
I know that since the Charlotte Dial abuse video, she’s changed her tune about Success Academy serving all children. Her latest is that for Special Ed. kids, Success Academy is not the place to go, that S.A. cannot be all things to all children.
Well, then don’t call your schools “public schools.”
This whole thing where Eva — to bolster legal action — orders her staff to amass documentation of whatever minute failing on the part of any outside, oversight personnel who visit the school … “and then escalate” … is truly pathetic.
If a member of the DOE’s Committee on Special Education “shows up late, does not act professionally, does not listen, you must document it … and escalate,” the memo reads.
Hey, why stop there? What about if that person has a tie that is crooked? Or body odor?
You’re right, though. Since these interactions are likely not videotaped (maybe they should be), Eva and her ilk can lie, lie, lie all the ding-dong day in court about DOE “Special Ed” compliance officers “not listening” or failing to do their jobs in some manner.
Why doesn’t Eva and Co. use that same energy actually tending to the needs of those students, instead of spending it trying to attack those who are there on campus trying to ascertain if Eva & Co. are fulfilling their legal responsibilities to those students?
LikeLike
I am still rather stunned that we don’t know the name of the assistant teacher who videotaped Success Academy’s “model” teacher punishing and humiliating a child for not knowing the right answer. When a parent spoke out the private records of a child were released. It is unlike Success not to try to attack her. Is she holding back more that they are afraid of her releasing?
LikeLike
Yeah, actually THERE ARE MORE VIDEOS that this same teachers’ assistant can and may go public with in the future… if you believe the words of a news reporter to whom she spoke:
(NOTE how this was not a one-time anomaly, but something the teachers’ assistant “was tired of seeing”.)
————————————
( 01:18 – 1:30)
( 01:18 – 1:30)
REPORTER: “The video was recorded be an assistant teacher who told Pix 11 News that she was tired of seeing it was because she was tired of seeing this kind of behavior by Ms. Dial every time there was a ‘Numbers Stories’ exercise.”
——————————————–
Now, here’s the mind-blowing kicker at the end of this news report. The teachers’ aide says she’s got more videos showing abusive behavior by teachers at Success Academy:
——————————————–
( 03:57 – 4:21)
( 03:57 – 4:21)
REPORTER: “The (assistant) teacher who recorded that video surre – tiously… sur-REP-titiously has told Pix 11 that that (video) is not the ONLY video. She has OTHER videos that show that this was typical behavior in that classroom, again, with the teacher that has been touted as being ‘exemplary’ for other Success Academy teachers.”
———————————
Well, it’s been a month-and-a-half since the infamous video became public (Friday, February 12), so what’s taking the assistant teacher so long in sharing more videos… if she does, in fact, have them?
Maybe Eva is holding back on attacking her because Eva’s afraid that she’ll release more videos? Who knows?
LikeLike
Jack I have to nitpick on SpEd. Granted Eva’s bloviations on the subject are as lacking in shades of gray as DTrump’s exhortations. And would that she were actually interested in changing Ed policy, where’s the evidence.
I put 2 of 3 kids thro NJ SpEd in the early 2000’s; perhaps for others like me the phrase “Special Ed Compliance Machine” rings a bell. SpEd was crucial to their success– both did well in average-difficulty college programs which focused on their talents (music tech). Neither needed SpEd accommodations (offered) at the college level. SpEd, for them, was a way to get decent grades in a high-priced school district which catered primarily to its cohort of Ivy-competitive students.
I had the best of all possible circumstances. 2 longtime distr-teacher friends who’d known my eldest all his life knew he’d benefit & encouraged me to look beyond ‘labeling’ fears, take advantage of the services my hi taxes paid for. A NYS SpEd supv sis walked me thro every step to make sure all was kosher. And my own research-heavy BA, plus the Internet.
Nevertheless the ‘compliance machine’– regularly-updated 3-ins of pprwk, , annual battery of tests, Drs appts, mtgs– is a special kind of hell-frosting thickly smeared onto the cake that is learning to parent a kid ‘differently-wired’ w/emotional & physical & academic challenges. The continual background static of resistant teachers & principals (he’s obviously intelligent, why can’t he/ just make him… [fill in blank] is the all-over sprinkles. And the clear unspoken message throughout (please just put this kid on drugs that would be so much cheaper than making us… [fill in blank] is the cherry on top.
This district eventually went to bat for the eldest (self-contained hs classes for some core courses), but not until he had suffered psychosis/ psych hosp stay as a result of ADHD drugs [then AD’s for the suicidal depression triggered by ADHD drugs]– recommended by the district’s ed-psych during initial IEP evaluation. That trauma (speculatively) robbed him of 5 relatively normal yrs he could have anticipated before the usual late-teens onset of bipolar. Which in turn exacerbated symptoms of the congenital autoimmune disease from which he had suffered only relatively mild symptoms until then.
Youngest fared far better in SpEd only because of what we had learned from eldest: we spoke plainly, there would be no drugs & they had better figure out how to teach him. And they did, providing self-contained classes where needed, even providing back-to-back math classes sr yr when jr-yr practice exit exam showed deficits.
So, yes, SpEd helped greatly. But the ‘SpEd Compliance Machine’ is real. It’s a product of top-down mandates & accountability mentality. Its only reason for existence is a centralized public-school system set up like an assembly-line, where non-conforming products are spit out, like faulty race-cars, into pit-repair. The ‘SpEd Compliance Machine’ informed us during eldest’s sr yr hs: surprise: your eldest is not after all ADHD. He simply has a 40-pt difference between his [genius-level] IQ & his ‘processing speed’. Which I had been trying to tell them since K. Which is not treatable with ADHD meds. Another cherry on the cake.
LikeLike
Sorry I descended too much into detail & the point was lost. I’m trying to say that, tho the IEP program can do much to help kids, its machinery, typical of any govt program has ballooned into redundancies & processing excess– too much is related to accountability (both ensuring that needed services are offered & that excess services are not) & too little is left to teacher & SpEd admin judgment. The level of micromgt is overweening just as in other DOEd programs we talk about here. There has to be some middle road between this & the gross lack of regulation applied to charters.
LikeLike
I feel for you freelancer. It is really only recently that processing is being recognized as an issue that can be totally separate from ADD and ADHD (or not). I’m glad your son has finally been “diagnosed” correctly. The special ed compliance machine while cumbersome for all participants can work in your favor if you know your rights. As a retired special ed teacher, I was not a fan of the process, which really seemed driven more by lawyers than educators. I can assure you that it is still much better than before we had such a system. It forces us to try to figure out a plan for educating each and every child to the full extent of their abilities. We almost never hit the ball out of the park, but we get a lot more base hits than before. There is still so much to learn.
LikeLike
On the topic of lack of oversight to charter schools, it’s hard to beat this story out of Chicago:
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/uno-united-neighborhood-organization-charter-schools-chicago-spending-revealed-juan-rangel/
Keep in mind that this is not an aberration in an otherwise sound system. This is a very feature to that system … the enabling of crooks to be crooks… which will continue as charter folks like Eva fight any regulation tooth and nail, throwing up lawsuit after lawsuit from the highest-price-lawyers their ill-gotten taxpayer money can buy.
Given human nature — or more precisely certain individual’s nature — this is what invariably results from de-regulation of public schools: (Notice how hard they fight even Freedom of Information requests… that which one hides is that of which one is ashamed.)
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/uno-united-neighborhood-organization-charter-schools-chicago-spending-revealed-juan-rangel/
————————————————
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES:
“Even as they ran a network of charter schools for thousands of students in low-income neighborhoods across Chicago, United Neighborhood Organization leader Juan Rangel and other UNO officials were piling up big bills at fancy restaurants and for travel on the taxpayers’ dime, records obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times show.
“In the year before a contracting scandal led to Rangel’s forced resignation, the clout-heavy Hispanic community organization and charter-school operator spent more than $60,000 for restaurants on his American Express ‘business platinum’ card, according to the records, which UNO fought for nearly three years to keep secret.
Promoted Stories from politicsChatter
“Who is Jorge Ramos? 11 things you should know about the veteran Univision newsman
“The spending spree included $1,000-or-higher tabs at Gene & Georgetti, Carmichaels, Vivo Chicago, Rosebud Prime, the East Bank Club, Carnivale, a downtown hotel’s rooftop bar and Soldier Field’s concessions during a soccer game featuring Mexico’s men’s national team.
“And UNO spent more than $60,000 a year on travel in 2010 and 2011, the internal records show. Rangel alone flew out of town 31 times in four years.
PICTURE — CEO of UNO Juan Rangel and Mayor Rahm Emanuel before the mayor announced a new Welcoming Ordinance, at Little Village High School 3120 S. Kostner, which will make Chicago a more immigrant-friendly city. Tuesday July 10, 2012 | Brian Jackson~Sun-Times
“Juan Rangel with Mayor Rahm Emanuel in July 2012. | Sun-Times file photo
“In 2010, Rangel traveled at the organization’s expense to Managua, Nicaragua, the records show. Rangel and two aides, Miguel d’Escoto and Francisco ‘Pancho’ d’Escoto, met during that trip with the d’Escotos’ uncle, a former diplomat advising them on possible expansion.
“Rangel’s and UNO’s fortunes took a downturn after the Sun-Times reported in February 2013 that the organization paid millions of dollars from a $98 million state school-construction grant to companies owned by two brothers of Miguel d’Escoto, who was Rangel’s top deputy, and to other contractors with close ties to the group.
“As federal and state authorities began investigating, the newly obtained records show, UNO officials spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to contain the scandal, which cost the organization millions of dollars in state funding and resulted in a federal consent decree requiring outside oversight of the group’s contracting practices.
“UNO has paid more than $962,000 since the start of 2013 to the firm of Mary Patricia Burns, who became the group’s primary lawyer shortly after the scandal broke.
“Her law firm, Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd., has been a major campaign contributor to Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. The state Democratic Party boss from the Southwest Side sponsored UNO’s state grant — which was the biggest government subsidy given to charter schools in the country. Burns didn’t return calls seeking comment.
“The organization also paid more than $307,000 to retired federal judge Wayne Andersen and others who aided him in an investigation of UNO’s contracting practices.
The spending took place as UNO was operating a government-funded charter schools serving about 8,000 predominantly Hispanic students, largely from low-income families. About 96 percent of students at UNO’s 16 campuses qualify for free or reduced lunches, records show.
“Despite being almost entirely government-funded, UNO leaders fought to keep the spending records secret, arguing that they didn’t have to comply with the state’s Freedom of Information Act because UNO is a private organization. But they ultimately released the records in a recent legal settlement with the Sun-Times.
“Since UNO founded the charter-school chain in 1998, the Chicago Public Schools system has given the privately run schools hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, in addition to the state funding the organization got for school construction. Until less than a year ago, the UNO Charter School Network — which is separately incorporated — passed along much of the CPS funding to UNO, which managed the schools.
“The charter network cut ties with its former parent organization last year. Before then, it was paying UNO millions of dollars a year for management fees, rent for school buildings owned by the community group and janitorial services.
“The records obtained by the Sun-Times also show that UNO paid:
Victor Reyes, in 2003. Sun-Times file photo
“• More than $600,000 to the Roosevelt Group, a lobbying firm that worked for UNO to get the grant from Springfield in 2009. The Roosevelt Group is headed by onetime Hispanic Democratic Organization leader Victor Reyes and former Madigan aide Mike Noonan.
“• More than $88,000 to Disney Resort Destinations, which hosted UNO employees who traveled to Florida for training.
“• More than $72,000 for board insurance from Mesirow Insurance Services Inc. Mesirow, hired in 2013, has employed the House speaker’s son Andrew Madigan, who made a $2,500 contribution to UNO in November 2012.
“• More than $65,000 to ASGK Public Strategies, a Chicago public-relations firm that helped UNO to respond to the crony contracting scandal.
“• Nearly $150,000 for the grand opening of a new charter school on the Northwest Side in 2012. The cost covered fireworks, a laser-light show and a mariachi band to entertain a crowd that included Mayor Rahm Emanuel and then-Gov. Pat Quinn. UNO spent another $738.40 the next year to fly a son of baseball legend Roberto Clemente from Puerto Rico for an event naming the new school after Clemente.
“• More than $11,600 for 42 buses that brought parents of UNO students to a September 2011 rally at the University of Illinois at Chicago for increased public funding of charter schools. The group also bused parents to demonstrate at City Hall, the Chicago Board of Education and the Thompson Center.
“• $480 at the spa at the luxurious Peninsula Hotel. UNO officials say the organization bought gift cards for staff.
“Rangel said in a written statement that the spending ‘must be put in the right context.
“ ‘Expenses were incurred to advance UNO’s mission and to be a world-class organization that supported our students, our schools and the Hispanic community,’ Rangel said.
“UNO began more than 30 years ago as a Hispanic community group on the Southeast Side but grew to be a major force in politics in all of the city’s fast-growing Hispanic neighborhoods. Rangel forged alliances with politicians including Madigan, former Mayor Richard M. Daley and Ald. Edward Burke (14th). He also served as co-chairman of Emanuel’s first campaign for mayor in 2011.
“Fueling UNO’s growing clout was its entry into the charter business — and the government funding the schools brought. CPS funding to the UNO schools for the 12 months ending last June topped $85 million, out of the charter network’s total revenues of about $91 million, records show.
“In 2014, the charter network paid the parent organization nearly $7.5 million in management fees, about $2.5 million in rent and more than $3 million for janitorial services. Those payments accounted for 87 percent of UNO’s income, records show.
“In Illinois, as in many states, the law allowing for the creation of public financed but privately run charter schools requires them to hold open board meetings and make their records public. But UNO officials argued they didn’t have to open their books, saying the community group was only a contractor working for the charter network and didn’t deal directly with CPS.
“The Sun-Times challenged that stance in 2013, citing UNO’s handling of all management functions for the schools. The newspaper also noted that UNO and the charter network at the time had the same leaders and also shared the same offices and record-keeping system.
Attorney General Lisa Madigan. | Rich Hein / Sun-Times file photo
Attorney General Lisa Madigan. | Rich Hein / Sun-Times file photo
“The Illinois attorney general’s office, which referees Freedom of Information Act disputes, sided with the Sun-Times.
“ ‘For purposes of governing the charter schools, UNO and [its charter network] are inextricably intertwined and act as the same entity,’ Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan wrote in July 2013, ordering UNO to turn over the financial records.
“UNO challenged the attorney general’s ‘binding opinion’ in Cook County circuit court. A judge upheld the attorney general’s decision in February 2015, but UNO appealed.
“Under new leadership, UNO eventually settled the case, providing the news organization with all of the previously disputed documents.
“Those records detail how the organization’s leaders enjoyed perks that many of the working-class families served by the charter schools could only imagine.
“Rangel — whose annual salary was $275,000 — and other UNO executives were regulars at some of the city’s most upscale restaurants. In 2012 and 2013, they incurred nearly 600 charges for meals, totaling more than $80,000.
“The single biggest tab was on Aug. 15, 2012, for $2,387.81 at Roof, on the 27th floor of the Wit Hotel downtown.
“There was also a $2,328 bill on March 13, 2012, at the East Bank Club, where UNO held meetings of its Metropolitan Leadership Institute for young Latino professionals.
“Another big night was at Carnivale, where Rangel charged $1,867.13 in October 2012. UNO officials say the event was a celebration for staff and board members with October birthdays.
“The largest single vendor among restaurants was Tio Luis Tacos on Archer Avenue on the Southwest Side. UNO spent more than $12,000 there in 2012 and 2013 for ‘community outreach events, staff meetings and board meetings.’
“Rangel also used his UNO credit card to pay hundreds of dollars on concessions at Toyota Park in Bridgeview during Chicago Fire soccer matches. He said UNO ‘expressed its appreciation’ to teachers, staff and parent volunteers at the soccer games and other events.
“UNO’s travel spending eclipsed the in-town dining bills. The organization spent more than $68,000 on travel costs in 2011 and about $63,000 in 2010.
“Records show Rangel’s travels included 10 trips to Washington, D.C., seven to New York, three to New Orleans, two to Boston and one each to Memphis and San Francisco. UNO officials said their records indicate outside organizations paid for only a few of those trips.
PICTURE — Cuauhtemoc Blanco waves to fans at the Azteca stadium in Mexico City on March 5. AFP / Getty Images
“UNO paid for Rangel to fly to Mexico in 2010 and China in 2012. Organization officials said Rangel visited soccer academies operated by former Chicago Fire star Cuauhtemoc Blanco and the Pachuca professional club. He and three other UNO leaders accompanied students who made a trip to Beijing and Shanghai, according to the group’s records.
“ ‘I and others at UNO sought out partnerships to bring additional resources and funding from a number of organizations and institutions in New York, Washington, D.C., and many other cities and countries,’ Rangel said.
“Twenty of the organization’s employees, including Rangel, flew to Orlando in April 2012. The costs for those plane tickets totaled more than $8,400. That was in addition to the costs for the training sessions at the Magic Kingdom and a Disney event here.
“ ‘UNO always sought out the best training for its staff, including the Disney Institute, to make sure that our students got the best education experience that the Hispanic community deserves,’ Rangel said.
“Besides the trip to Nicaragua with Rangel and his cousin Francisco d’Escoto, Miguel d’Escoto made two more trips at UNO’s expense to the Central American country in 2010. His uncle Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann is a Catholic priest who was president of the United Nations General Assembly in 2008 and 2009 and previously was Nicaragua’s foreign minister.
“Miguel D’Escoto said he and Rangel met with his uncle to try to form a group that could provide education ‘in areas or conditions of crisis.’
“Miguel d’Escoto quit his $200,000-a-year post at UNO eight days after the first of the Sun-Times’ reports on the group’s spending were published.
“Andersen, the retired judge, was then hired by UNO at a rate of $800 an hour — altogether being paid more than $59,000.
“UNO also paid for two lawyers ($148,264.62), a real-estate development expert ($60,182.50) and a licensed private investigator ($8,667.50) to aid Andersen.
“After Rangel promised to institute reforms suggested by Andersen, state officials lifted a suspension of UNO’s grant in June 2013. But the state funding was frozen again after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission launched a probe that resulted in civil fraud charges against UNO. In June 2014, the group settled the charges, which accused UNO of misleading bond investors about the insider deals.
“In the end, the scandal cost UNO $15 million of the promised $98 million state grant.
“UNO had paid $604,500 to the Roosevelt Group lobbyists between December 2006 and August 2013, records show.
“The lobbyists at first charged UNO $3,000 a month, raising that to $7,500 in June 2009 — when the Illinois General Assembly approved the grant for new school buildings.
” ‘The Roosevelt Group billed an extra $25,000 the day after the law approving the grant took effect. That was for “consulting services for charter capital campaign.’ There also was a $110,000 “additional payment” to the lobbyists in July 2010, six weeks after the state wired the first payment from the grant, for $25 million.
“In a resignation letter in October 2013, Reyes wrote to Rangel that the two large, additional payments to the Roosevelt Group were to compensate his firm for having given UNO a discount during the early years of their dealings.
“Noonan declined to comment.
“Rangel, now 50, resigned under fire in December 2013 and was given a severance payout of $206,250. He had started at UNO in 1992, becoming CEO in 1996.
“The board of the UNO Charter School Network declined to extend its management deal with the parent organization, which ended last June. In November, UNO officials said the organization was “on the brink of insolvency.”
“UNO – Explainer
“Key dates in UNO schools saga
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
“1998 — United Neighborhood Organization opens its first government-funded charter school.
“2005 — The group begins expansion that eventually has it operating 16 schools across the city of Chicago.
“2009 — Spearheaded by House Speaker Michael Madigan, the Illinois Legislature approves a $98 million school-construction grant for UNO schools — a record public subsidy to charter schools.
“2011 — UNO CEO Juan Rangel co-chairs Rahm Emanuel’s first campaign for mayor.
“Feb. 4, 2013 — First stories in Sun-Times investigation expose how contractors with insider ties are profiting from the state grant — including companies owned by two brothers of top Rangel aide Miguel d’Escoto that were paid millions of dollars.
“Feb. 12, 2013 — D’Escoto resigns under pressure from $200,000-a-year post.
“October 2013 — Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration cuts off remaining $15 million in funding from $98 million state grant.
“June 3, 2014 — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission files and immediately settles civil charges against UNO, accusing it of defrauding bond investors. UNO promises never again to hand out insider deals and agrees to oversight by a federal monitor.
“July 14, 2015 — Sun-Times reports Rangel got secret $206,250 severance payout.”
LikeLike
One week ago I filed a federal OCR complaint against Success Academy pursuant to their website’s inaccessibility and lack of 504 procedures!
LikeLike
My new blog about promoting social justice through access to books and family literacy programs.
http://calebbetton.blogspot.com/
LikeLike
Does anyone know where a copy of the memo can be accessed-the memo itself and not just excerpts?
LikeLike
Duane, I think the link takes you to the memo
LikeLike
I’ll try again but I couldn’t find a copy of the memo, itself, just quotes. I’ll let you know.
LikeLike
Tried again and couldn’t find it. If someone else sees it in either Peter’s post or the Politico article please steer me in the right direction. I may just be blind and can’t see the tree from the forest. Otherwise anyone know where to find it?
LikeLike