This is a must-read article. Share it with your friends who don’t understand the corporate assault on American public schools.
Jeff Bryant writes here about the Walton family’s effort to impose the Walmart business philosophy on public education. I have called it the Walmartization of public education. The he family collectively is worth about $150 billion.
When Walmart enters a community, the local businesses can’t compete with its low prices and vast inventory. The local businesses close down. Main Streets across America are filled with empty stores and a dying commercial core, thanks to Walmart’s cutthroat competition. Walmart doesn’t care about community. It has only one purpose: profits for Walmart.
Central to to its business philosophy is cost-cutting. It wants the lowest-paid employees. It wants the lowest price products, so it buys wherever labor costs are lowest. I would be surprised if anything sold by Walmart is American-made.
To to achieve its goal of low prices and high profits, Walmart is anti-union.
When Walmart recently announced that it was closing more than 150 stores, many people lost their jobs, and many communities awoke to realize they had no grocery store, no hardware store, no toy store, no shoe store, no drug store. Walmart had killed them all.
The Waltons are doing to education what they have done in business: killing off beloved community schools and replacing them with privately managed charter schools that have no roots in the community. These schools are almost always non-union. They are staffed by Teach for America recruits, who will be gone in two or three years.
Instead of local community schools staffed by career teachers whose parents and grandparents lived in the community, the new charters are transient, filled with transient teachers and administrators. If they don’t enroll enough students or if they see a better market niche elsewhere or if their scores are disappointing, they will close and move on, leaving a shattered community behind.
As I write this, I suddenly remembered my third-grade teacher in Houston, Miss Doty. Years later, I read that she became principal of an elementary school. A deranged father entered the school grounds while the children were at recess. She rushed out, shooed the children inside, and stood between him and the school entrance. He set off a homemade bomb, killed himself, and Ms. Doty lost a leg.
Nothing transient about Ms. Dory or her school. Now Houston is awash in charter schools. They siphon money away from public schools, as well as the motivated parents and children. One of the purposes of public education–building community–is sacrificed to the market.
Walmart represents the predatory face of capitalism. As Bryant asks, why should a handful of billionaires reshape public education?
Hillary was on the board of Walmart. Granted, it was in the Sam Walton days and, from what I understand, he was a more decent human being than his offspring. But I haven’t heard a negative word from Hillary as far as what Walmart has become and what they do to small towns or their role in education rephorm.
Whatever Sam Walton’s personality might have been like, it was he who developed the predatory Walmart business model we’ve come to know and (rightfully) loathe.
No pass for Hillary on this one; over the years, she’s carried water for some pretty awful policies and interests.
“Who voted for that?”
Who voted for Walton?
Who voted for Gates?
Who voted for Galt an
Ayn Randian fates?
Who voted for testing?
Who voted for tools?
Who voted for nesting
The charters in schools?
Who voted for Duncan?
Who voted for Eva?
Who voted for Coleman?
And Campbell, the diva?
Who voted for billions
For testing online?
Who voted for millions
Of children in line?
Who voted for Races
And waivers and none?
And judges and cases
That nonsense has won?
Who voted for Kings
And for all the Court fools?
Who voted for things
That are wrecking our schools?
One of your best, Poet, in my humble opinion. Reminds me of Lord Byron in tone.
I read this post before I went to work this morning. Now that I just got home, I wanted to thank you, Diane and Jeff, for this very elucidating read.
Sorry if I’m breaking up a conversation, commenters. Didn’t have time to read the comments today.
I like how this tries to make two competing points at once:
1) Walmart is terrible and is a behemoth that cannot be stopped.
2) It is closing stores.
The mythical mom and pop store that pays its check-out clerks $60k a year and matches their 401k contribution does not exist and it never has existed. The old stories about kids being able to pay for college by working over the summer was not because they were paid well, it’s because college was a fraction of the price that it is today. A lot of that cost can be explained by generous, government-backed loans to students, backed with no collateral that has ballooned to something like $1 trillion+ in outstanding, defaulting loans. If colleges have access to billions of dollars more each year, do you think they’re going to keep charging 1970s prices? If your salary doubles tomorrow, are you going to maintain your current level of spending? You’re probably going to look for a new house or significantly improve your existing one. That is what colleges are doing — continually building new fancy building while their existing facilities have, at best, maybe half of the classrooms occupied during peak times. I know, because I have seen it.
The increased cost to college can also be explained by the enormous growth in administrative staff at colleges.
Also, the work ethic in this country has completely declined. Places like Walmart used to be full of employees who were there as a stepping stone. High school students who got a job at 16 so they could build their resume and show the work ethic needed to get a better job. Today, we pass laws to disincentivize kids from working. We pass minimum wage laws that price them out of these jobs. If you are an employer, it may have made sense in the past to hire the high school kid for $6/hr. You know they likely won’t be employed with you long and they have no experience — so it’s a risk to spend resources to hire and train them. So, in places like Seattle where they are raising minimum wage to $15/hr, the people who take those jobs are the people who employers see as a safer bet: someone with little education, no other prospects, and someone who will likely be there for the long-haul. It’s not that they are necessarily a better employee (smarter, more creative, better work ethic), they are just a safer bet.
So, we now have jobs that were meant to be stepping stones for people to move to a more productive and aspirational lives, turning into McCareers that people expect to be at for decades. They think that being a clerk entitles them to white collar salaries. Meanwhile, they are probably terrible at their menial job. They give two squats about customer service and openly complain about their job in front of customers.
They were raised during the entitlement age. They were told that the American Dream meant being taken care of by Uncle Sam, instead of what it really is — a platform for those with even a fraction of ambition to be able to build a life for themselves.
Lastly, the problem with all of you government interventionists is that you think you can outsmart the rest of the country. You come up with all these crazy schemes to try to undermine the Big Bad Wolf, meanwhile, someone smarter creates Amazon.com, which will likely take down Walmart during this generation. Why? Because of those things that you appear to dread, while millions of Americans crave: low prices, convenience, efficiency.
So, whoever replaces Diane as the status quo advocate du jour will turn their attention to “Amazon Schools” or “Jeff Bezos Schools.” Embrace change. Stop boycotting taxi cab commissions because Uber does a better job for cheaper. “Accountability” does not mean occupational licenses or front-end regulations. Accountability is TO someone. You say you want public accountability. But you want accountability to some vague definition of the public, not the individuals that make up the public.
My big take away from Bryant’s post is that multi-billionaires have undue influence on public policy. Because Sam Walton read “A Nation at Risk” and Milton Friedman, he should not have the right to undermine public education through his deep pockets. Where is the evidence to justify such a policy shift? Policies should not be implemented just because billionaires like Walton or Gates want those changes. Currently three counties in Florida are adopting Gates’ CBE model despite the lack of evidence to support this change. What is notable is that almost all the shifts to charters have occurred because policymakers have been influenced by these billionaires. The public never gets to weigh in on the decision; they only get to live with the consequences. This is not how a democracy should operate.
Many changes should be made to the way charters function. If they use public money, they should have to play by the same rules as public schools. There should be transparency and accountability built in. The government should not offer tax credit and incentives to billionaires corporations to fund charters. This alone would reduce the amount of waste, fraud, and local disruption, and would leave mostly the “true believers” in the game. Charters should have to take all students and be subject to the same testing regime as public schools. While I think the testing is a waste, I don’t think we will ever be rid of it. Charters should not be able to advertise or lobby policymakers. This practice is unfair to public schools that were never designed to compete in the marketplace. Public schools are a public service, not a business. I also believe that government should have to compensate public schools when the number of students leaving causes harm to the local public school. Poor students should not get less, just because some students wanted something else. If these issues were addressed, I think we would start to create a better balance and less disruption to public schools and communities.
retired teacher: you got me to thinking…
Howzabout the heavyweight charter chains with their bidness-minded approach to education practice “truth in advertising”?
One point they should have to make clear to prospective customers/clients was on a restaurant I passed by yesterday: “We reserve the right to refuse service to anybody.”
😱
Thank you for your comments.
😎
Thanks Diane.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Discover what happens when community based, public schools are taken over by Walmart’s business methods.
Sorry for being off topic but this is in reference to the deranged father (that Diane had mentioned) who set off a suitcase bomb at an elementary school in 1959. Ms Doty was a hero as were other school employees who had lost their lives trying to protect the children. From the Houston Chronicle: Six people were killed: two 7-year-old boys, the school custodian, the man who carried some explosives into the school, the bomber’s own child, and a teacher.
Nineteen others were injured, most of them children, but also the school principal, Mrs. R. E. Doty, whose leg was broken. All eventually recovered, though two 7-year-olds each lost a leg.
About 125 pupils were on the school playground, in physical education classes, when the explosion occurred. [snip] Principal Doty said that Orgeron had come to her office earlier in the day, carrying a suitcase and accompanied by a 7-year-old boy. Doty told Orgeron he would have to register the child to enroll him in the school. He left, Doty said, but a few minutes later she received a report about a man acting strangely on the school playground.
Doty went outside and told the man he would have to leave, but he refused. Seconds later, he set off the dynamite.
http://www.chron.com/life/article/Poe-school-coverage-detailed-a-tragedy-1995461.php#
Joe,
Thank you for filling in the story that I read about many years ago!
reposted: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/03/16/1502222/-Dearest-Bernie-Sanders-Please-look-deeper-into-charter-schools#comment_60368337
Ca there be a bright side to the machinations of Walmart and other corporate predators? Maybe. When they abandon the towns, citizens can start businesses anew. And this time, when a Walmart comes knockin’; they will know that they have to stand up and fight!!!