Veteran educator Marion Brady has written a concise guide to the privatization movement.
He begins with an overview of the talking points and tactics of the privatizers:
“The pitch
“Talking Points: (a) Standardized testing proves America’s schools are poor. (b) Other countries are eating our lunch. (c) Teachers deserve most of the blame. (d) The lazy ones need to be forced out by performance evaluations. (e) The dumb ones need scripts to read or “canned standards” telling them exactly what to teach. (f) The experienced ones are too set in their ways to change and should be replaced by fresh Five-Week-Wonders from Teach for America. (Bonus: Replacing experienced teachers saves a ton of money.) (g) Public (“government”) schools are a step down the slippery slope to socialism.
“Tactics
“Education establishment resistance to privatization is inevitable, so (a) avoid it as long as possible by blurring the lines between “public” and “private.” (b) Push school choice, vouchers, tax write-offs, tax credits, school-business partnerships, profit-driven charter chains. (c) When resistance comes, crank up fear with the, “They’re eating our lunch!” message. (d) Contribute generously to all potential resisters—academic publications, professional organizations, unions, and school support groups such as PTA. (e) Create fake “think tanks,” give them impressive names, and have them do “research” supporting privatization. (f) Encourage investment in teacher-replacer technology—internet access, iPads, virtual schooling, MOOCS, etc. (e) Pressure state legislators to make life easier for profit-seeking charter chains by taking approval decisions away from local boards and giving them to easier-to-lobby state-level bureaucrats. (g) Elect the “right” people at all levels of government. (When they’re campaigning, have them keep their privatizing agenda quiet.)”
The key weapon in the privatization campaign is standardized tests. Privatizers use tests to “prove” that public schools are failing.
Here is a great line:
“If challenged, test fans often quote the late Dr. W. Edward Deming, the world-famous quality guru who showed Japanese companies how to build better stuff than anybody else. In his book, “The New Economics,” Deming wrote, “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”
“Here’s the whole sentence as he wrote it: “It is wrong to suppose that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it — a costly myth.”
And here’s the clincher:
“Notwithstanding their serious problems, America’s public schools were once the envy of the world. Now, educators around that world shake their heads in disbelief (or maybe cheer?) as we spend billions of dollars to standardize what once made America great—un-standardized thought.”
So much for the “close reading” skills of test fans!!
IMO, if are public schools were once the “envy of the world” and the schools really have not changed, then what is the cause of our apparent decline in the last several decades? The answer is easy: the demise of the American family (which itself is caused by many factors, ex. unjust wages, excessive debt, increased divorce rates, and a general degradation of the input that used to make our kids so ready for school [ie. cannot self-actualize if home life is suffering]). But, constituents would rather point fingers at schools than at families because schools are an easier scapegoat (and most of us don’t like pointing fingers at ourselves).
Perhaps you have your cart and your horse mixed up. Perhaps – assuming that the “American family” (whatever that is) really has “declined” – such decline is a result of society and not the cause. You could start by looking into “Reaganomics”/supply-sided economics as a start. Then start exploring the concept of “neoliberalism”. Perhaps we should stop blaming either schools or families and look instead to the power-hungry money grubbers that are screwing us all.
If you want to deny that divorce is harmful to the “family unit” and that there is a positive correlation between lower student performance and higher (more frequent or multiple) divorces; then yes, you have the right to be erroneous.
While there are social forces that have input into family structure and support (ex. wages, legislature, etc.), the family is also a moral-unit, where kids learn discipline, perseverance, diligence and all the other affective traits that will catalyze their own views and applications of self-efficacy.
In a society that denies the concept of sin and moral absolutes, our “sociologists” are always looking to lay the blame somewhere else.
Is divorce more or less harmful to the “family unit” than staying in a toxic marriage? Say, one where one parent yells at the other or demeans him/her all the time or one in which both partners partake in such behavior?
And if you don’t understand the connection between “moral” behavior and social class, then I invite you to follow what Jesus actually said to do and sell everything you own, give it to the poor and live in abject poverty. I mean, sure, Jesus did it, but he was Jesus. Most of us, when faced with a choice between, say, stealing or going hungry (or between running drugs or going hungry), or maybe between lying or getting the snot beaten out of you, will tend to choose the “immoral” path.
I understand there are connections between opportunity and social class, and some of those opportunities may develop, or not, one’s moral behavior. But, you sound like a determinist, believing a direct-link between class and morality (at least you implied it). “Better is the poor in their integrity than the rich in their deceit” “Better is a meal of vegetables with love, than a fattened calf with contention”.
You can rationalize divorce, but the fact remains it harms developing childrens’ psyche soul; to see those that say they love each other “bite and devour one another”. Maybe that couple needs to learn forgiveness and grace?
The command to the rich and young ruler to “sell all” was specific to his case, because he was a coveting consumerist-idolater who put Mammon before his neighbor, and his Creator. Yes, my faith commands to “esteem others better than one-self….to put other’s needs before ones own”, because by nature (fallen) we are all too self-absorbed and self-centered.
No question the American family is under stress. The problem is support systems and safety nets have eroded. Families are often isolated from other family members or both parents working sometimes several jobs. People are working more hours in jobs paying less with higher stress levels. Vacations are never really taken or become just an extension of the office. Retirement is a moving goal post. College is unaffordable to those wanting to go without indentured servitude to banks.
People are angry. They know something is fundamentally wrong with our system and economy. But they can not agree on what the problem is and how to fix it. So we have Trump/Cruz war tribes blaming immigrants, government, women, teachers, and anybody under 40 with a nose ring. The Sanders movement seems a less abrasive version of the Trumpettes. But heaven forbid we dare say socialism, even if most of the country has benefitted from public good and social safety nets of the past.
We’ve had decades of trickle down, supply side, deregulated, free market Reaganomics. Republicans control most state governments, all of Congress, media, education, finance, business, SCOTUS, and are the core of the military. All through an artificial hold on power through gerrymandering, voter suppression, and dark money. If families are hurting, it is time for a new approach.
Diene, Jesus’ only directive was that we spread the good news, and that we treat others as we would like to be treated.
“You can rationalize divorce, but the fact remains it harms developing childrens’ psyche soul; to see those that say they love each other “bite and devour one another”.”
Okay, but what does divorce have to do with that? Many married couples who *don’t* divorce “bite and devour one another”. What I’m saying is that in those cases, divorce is better than staying together. As just one example (and, yes, I know that one example doesn’t really prove anything), I have some friends who were very unhappily married, were sniping at each other every day, were miserable and showing it in front of the kids who were, in turn, miserable. They got divorced, she bought a house down the street from him and now they’re the best of friends and the kids are happy and relaxed. You can talk about how divorce has increased since some mythical golden age and how “the family” has “declined”, but in the “good” old days, that couple simply wouldn’t have been able to get divorced – they would have been stuck in their misery unless one of them cheated. They wouldn’t have been any healthier for not having gotten divorced.
As far as Jesus, here’s what He said: “Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”” No, He wasn’t talking to just one person, He’s talking to anyone who wants to perfect their faith. It’s not a commandment in the same way as love your neighbor and love your God because not everyone can be perfect.
Rick, I agree with you. Breakdown of the nuclear family.
Dienne, Jesus said a lot of things. But they all point to treating others as you would like to be treated. Take care of eachother.
The truth is that we have not declined. We never were more than middling on international tests – because we offered a general, not a narrowed education. Those countries that do better on the tests tend to do so because they teach solely to the test – a much narrower curriculum. This is/was why we were able to sustain the most productive, most creative, most successful economy.
Thanks Don, I’ve never believed that a nation’s test scores are the main predictor of its’ current or future “success” (however that is measured); anymore than I believe that for a student. Yes, a generalist curriculum is good, in that students get a good overall skill set, which they can build upon and specialize, depending on their career goals.
A kid decent in algebra and science, or not, should be able to go out and get a loan and buy several acres, and with hard work and dedication have a successful small farm business (where he can feed his family and others). It’s not rocket science or coding that every student needs (the overemphasis on STEM?) (and I say this as a science teacher). We need people in the trades and labor, and especially food production, or else all the big tech companies that we are so enamored with, ex. Google, will not even exist.
Excellent summary of strategies. Add stack ranking systems galore.
Next wave from the Gates Foundation is a US Inspectorate system for teacher education with the mission of discrediting not just teachers and schools and teacher education programs but killing academic freedom and installing industrial strength “gotcha” accountability (accountabaloney) under the banner of “elevating the teaching profession.”
How about if Gates Foundation went after the mosquito that causes Zika virus instead?
Booklady,
A megalomaniac manipulator would rather impact all of the nation’s people-i.e. the education of OUR children, in OUR schools, with OUR tax dollars.
And, the bonus- there’s profit for ideological kin in Silicon Valley and on Wall Street
Booklady, he would have us all walking around in mosquito nets recording the number of bites with and without nets at different times of day. Then, of course, there would be a push for everyone to wear his new handy dandy automatic recording device that does something to measure the pressure of a mosquito proboscis drilling into our skin.
Gates has already caused lots of damage in health care around the world, and some of those mosquito nets they gave out have ended up being used as nets for fishing by people who were hungry and needed to eat.
Teachout for Congress!!! https://www.longislandpress.com/2016/01/27/zephyr-teachout-common-core-opponent-running-for-congress/
The real strategy for stopping this nonsense.
The forces of privatization are as powerful as they are uncommitted.
Un-committable?
I’d like those forces to be committed. To the looney bin where they belong.
I much appreciate Marion Brady giving the full Deming quote.
Just what did W. Edwards Deming have to say about what he called ManagementByResults/ManagementByObjective? And did the “Father of Quality” ever address education?
From THE ESSENTIAL DEMING: LEADERSHIP PRINCIPLES FROM THJE FATHER OF QUALITY (Joyce N. Orsini, ed., 2013, p. 56):
[start]
The worst example of numerical goals came out to our own Department of Education. We did it. On the 18th of April, 1991: Numerical goals. No method. No method suggested. Just numerical goals drawn out of the sky. Such nonsense in high places. Think of the harm done by those numerical goals put out by our Department of Education. Unwitting, innocent people read them and do not understand what is wrong. The harm done cannot be measured. The high school graduation rate will increase to 90 percent. Why stop at 90? If you don’t have to have a method, why not make it 95? 98?
[end]
And on the stacked/forced ranking that rheephormsters love so much for OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN (p. 199 of above):
[start]
Let’s talk about education for a minute. There is deep concern in the United States today about education. No notable improvement will come until our schools abolish grades (A, B, C, D) in schools from toddlers, on up through the university. Grades are often a forced ranking. Only 20 percent permitted to get As. Thirty percent may get Bs, 30 percent may get Cs, 20 percent may get Ds. Forced ranking. You mean there’s a shortage of good pupils? Well, I don’t think so. Why should there be a shortage? I don’t believe there is a shortage. Only 20 percent? That’s nonsense. Maybe there aren’t any; maybe everybody should get As. Forced ranking is wrong, I think.
Abolish merit ratings for teachers. Who knows what a great teacher is? Not till years have gone by. Abolish comparison of schools on the basis of scores. the aim is to get a high score, not to learn, but to cram your head full of information. Abolish gold stars for athletics. Indeed, we’re worse off than we thought we were.
[end]
The excerpts are both from the same presentation—in 1992!
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
😎
For me, I go back to what ed reformers said in 2009-10 because that was really the height of their influence- they were riding high. I was shocked a lot listening to them because it was incredibly negative and divisive. I recall watching one of the early “Education Nations” and thinking “this is a sophisticated, planned hit job on public schools”.
This is a piece on Duncan from that period. I challenge anyone to read what the Secretary said and tell me this guy is an “agnostic” or “open minded” or “data driven”.
He accuses people of lying, hints at malicious motives and announces that his education agenda will solve both the immediate financial crisis that was going on at the time and long term inequality and wage stagnation. There was none of the softer “plus/and” language they’ve adopted since then. He didn’t need it. He had all the power in the world and virtually no opposition.
They’ve rebranded. They’ve softened the tone. They are, after all, political professionals. But what Duncan said in 2010 and what was repeated endlessly, everywhere, in what amounted to a coordinated political campaign, is what they believe.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/02/01/class-warrior
The reformers call me names often and question my motives. When I write in support of public schools, they call me “divisive.”
dianeravitch: when it comes to public education, you heed the good advice of a genuine American hero—
“With reasonable men, I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.” [William Lloyd Garrison]
Easy to say that you should wear their opprobrium as a badge of honor, but another genuine American hero offers some equally sound advice:
“A gentleman will not insult me, and no man not a gentleman can insult me.” [Frederick Douglass]
I sometimes have serious disagreements with you, but credit where credit is due.
I do think, however, that we are in complete agreement here—
“Truth is powerful and it prevails.” [Sojourner Truth]
Keep on keepin’ on.
😎
Whoa, Chiara!
“The speech marked the ascendancy of a cohort of superintendents exemplified by Duncan, Klein, Paul Vallas (Duncan’s predecessor in Chicago and now the head of the Recovery School District in Louisiana), and Michelle Rhee, the chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools.”
What a scary rogues’ gallery!
The hidden agenda of privatization frequently goes unnoticed by the public since the powerful own the media that filters the “news worthy” content. This unwritten gag order allows the privatization forces to often operate in the shadows behind the curtain of dark money.
I think the above post outlines the privatization game plan. More than influence the policymakers, the wealthy forces behind privatization often have leaders of states or cities deliberately starve public schools, or enact bottom 5% laws to make them vulnerable to takeover or to make takeover inevitable. This is an insidious, anti-democratic move by elected officials. Any officials guilty of this duplicitous behavior should be kicked to the curb by voters in the next election cycle.
“According to the rules of the competition, released in November, states’ applications are awarded points: fifty-eight points (out of a possible five hundred) for improving principal and teacher effectiveness; fifty points for turning around lowest-achieving schools; twenty-four points for fully implementing a statewide longitudinal data system. The higher a state’s score, the more likely it is to win a grant. Orchestrating this kind of high-stakes competition is a departure for the Department of Education. “When we have a lot more losers than winners, and my popularity plummets, they’ll know we’re for real and this is not education politics as usual,” Duncan told me.”
Winners and losers, baby, and the CEO of Schools will be picking them. You’re on notice, public schools. Get with the program.
There was absolutely nothing “collaborative” about this. Has it changed? Really? How so?
A cage fight starring Duncan, Eli Broad, Charles or David Koch and one of the Walton kin. When blood is drawn. the public can cheer.
Brady’s description provides good coverage but, he left out the piece about newspapers always quoting Fordham, never identifying its billionaire funders, and never providing a quote from the opposition. It’s become one of the great mysteries of journalism in our state.
If editors cared about the public, the headline, for at least one of their reports, would be the borrowed, “Obama Admin Enables Billionaire Takeover of Schools”.
I’m baffled why the Fordham people seem to be running Ohio public education.
Aren’t we paying a large group of state employees in Columbus to do this work? Do they not want the job? If not, can they resign and let someone who wants to do it apply?
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/01/27/charter-school-leaders-say-they-need-more-money-from-state.html
For many Ohio reporters, the plutocratic owners, partisan editors, and/or advertisers may make it impossible to be both a newspaper employee and a journalist.
Here is a specific example of how the Gates Foundation attempts to control discussions of education and engages in data mining.
One of the big projects now is “content aggregation” and data analysis from a variety of websites, chat rooms, and other social media where teachers are active or teaching is under discussion.
Influencer Strategy Manager for Gates Foundation
Job posted on January 7, 2016 by: Mind Over Media,
“
The Influencer Strategy Manager is responsible for managing a network of teachers per the needs of our client, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This person will be in an influencer engagement role, working closely with these teachers to source and create relevant, authentic content for a set of social media streams. You’ll not only be managing an active group of teacher influencers, you’ll be discovering new influencers and reporting on the group’s activities.
Overall Responsibilities Include:
Work with Senior Director, Digital Strategy to set key goals and identify potential partnership opportunities with educational influencers.
•
Assertive identification, outreach, confirmation, and logistics management of a large group of influencers in a targeted and seamless manner that maps directly to an editorial calendar and social insights.
Collaborate with the Social Media Manager and client to manage lines of communication with influencers.
Structure and manage database of all influencer individuals and organizations.
Proactively identify opportunities for influencer involvement in various content, activities and events to maximize and execute against the project’s mission and vision.
Manage delivery of influencer content to the senior editor.
Work closely with the Social Media Manager to pair content with trending topics, follow active users and stay up-to-date on events happening via social, i.e., Twitter chats, Slack chats, Facebook groups, etc.
Among qualifications:
• Proven track record collaborating with team members to grow an audience and brand
• Experience building and managing a network of brand ambassadors or influencers
Source: http://www.idealist.org/view/job/9hb6Jgzd7jjd/
This is just part of the comprehensive strategy Gates has in place to impose his BRAND of education on everyone. Mind Over Media says it creates “extraordinary content and immersive, brand-building consumer experiences across web, mobile, social, print and video platforms.”
Do not be a brand ambassador for anything from Gates Foundation. If you have a website, are on Facebook, Twitter, use the Gates funded PowerMyLearning, assume that the content you post and retrieve is part of the Gates surveillance and data-gathering system.
A major aggregator of content for the arts on PowerMyLearning has a clear “buyer beware” privacy and liability policy—meaning totally worthless.
The Gates bait is always “free,” wrapped in some sort of “org.” even when it is strictly commercial.
The best products do not require so much “influencing.” Most successful ideas fill a void or an are upgrade on an existing product or service. That this system requires so much arm twisting to convince potential clients is highly suspect.
“Influencer Strategy Manager”? Or “Minister of Propaganda”?
Here’s a frightening article from two Florida blogger advocates on how Gates is worming his way into various counties with his CBE, competency based education with endless data mining and the potential to eliminate the teacher from teaching. https://accountabaloney.wordpress.com/
It’s just more propping up of a failed product by a piranha-like oligarchy. Or, it’s unprincipled employees, wanting to keep their “philanthropic” jobs, at the expense of the childhoods of kids.
Maybe like that tech employee from Canada, interviewed at Entrepreneur magazine, who called herself an education partner (having no education nor experience) and, who said, about schools buying tech products, “Teachers have to shift or get off of the pot.”
The education tech sellers have become parodies of themselves.
Any time I get a Gates.org sponsored link in my Twitter feed, I am sure to reply, in a manner which exposes the man behind the curtain. A small gesture to be sure, but it makes me happy!
I’m always amazed at all the money, tech, coding time, etc. thrown at this attempt to “improve educational efficiency” (by whatever metric one chooses….oops, I mean Bill G’s metric). Yet, most research shows no correlation between these new methods and improved learning (unless the “improved” learning means the child had to perform a routine in their metric or curriculum).
For years, decades (ex my generation of grad 1978) we took our classes, performed in class exams, and then took the SAT; that was it. We were well prepared for college, and if it “was not broken” why fix it?
In teaching chemistry, while Kahn videos and other web-based labs and remedial lectures may be helpful, and may engage the students of this digital generation, one could argue that just with a text book, good lecture notes and solid lab activities students will learn the concepts just fine and be ready for college. They don’t need Bill G and others trying to sell them new “snake oil”.
We throw so much at ed-tech, in order to impress stakeholders that we are “4th wave, cutting edge”, but much, to none, of it is any more efficacious than what was done 40 years ago. I call it the idolatry of the “golden hammer” (the belief a shiny new tool is inherently better than the tried and true “iron hammers” of the past).
Is there a difference between astroturfing and an “Influencer Strategy Manager for Gates Foundation Project”? Is the position like a pharmaceutical rep., where appearance/shininess is beneficial to the selling?
Thanks, Disne. Love Marion Brady’s work.
To Dienne:
I really enjoy reading your written confirmation in the last SHORT and SWEET sentence of the following paragraph. This puts a big smile on my face.
[start paragraph]
And if you don’t understand the connection between “moral” behavior and social class, then I invite you to follow what Jesus actually said to do and sell everything you own, give it to the poor and live in abject poverty. I mean, sure,
Jesus did it, but he was Jesus.
[end paragraph]
However, we must fight with all crooked evils in business without human conscience.
Here are many links to sum up your expression. No, please DO NOT blame on marriage breakdown, DO NOT blame on public education and teaching profession, BUT blame on GREED and LUST for POWER and CONTROL from crooked corporate.
Please enjoy listening song ” We didn’t start the fire” and reading insightful information from guru jeanhaverhill and Susan Lee Schwartz
Billy Joel – We Didn’t Start the Fire (Official Video)
We didn’t start the fire
It was always burning
Since the world’s been turning
We didn’t start the fire
No we didn’t light it
But we tried to fight it
https://corporatewatch.org/company-profiles/unilever-who-where-how-much
http://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/calvin-coolidge/videos/wall-street-owns-the-country
http://nyceducator.com/2010/09/ivy-league-union-busters-then-and-now.html
Thank you jeanhaverhill for the link of confirmation of Harvard and Fordham Institute who did:
– align with POWER IN THE CAPITAL SENSE
– gather power in the uniform of a militia or police tribe and
– beat up on the local workers in the factories then,
– accuse the teachers or other workers of being “stubborn”, “recalcitrant” or “incompetent” to DIVIDE THEM
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/inside-the-koch-brothers-toxic-empire-20140924
Thank you Susan Lee Schwartz for the best link of confirmation of Koch’s crooked business.
May, Back2basic
I am sorry for a wrong music link. Here is the right one.
May
Cross posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/A-primer-on-the-damaging-m-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Education_Privatization_Privatize-Education_Public-Education-160130-821.html
with this comment
Go to the Ravitch blog and put privatization in the search field,
https://dianeravitch.net/?s=Privitization
or go to my series on the subject
http://www.opednews.com/author/series/author40790.html