The Ohio blogger Plunderbund produces documents to show that Governor John Kasich and State Superintendent Richard Ross planned the takeover of the Youngstown City school district. Up until now, they claimed that they were responding to a request from Youngstown leaders to get involved. But Plunderbund says Kasich and Ross initiated the process, not Youngstown residents.
The plan involves having the state takeover after the school board resigns, the local superintendent resigns, and the union contracts are canceled. Then…we may speculate that the goal is to turn the district into an all-charter district, which would meet ALEC specifications. This kind of structural change doesn’t improve schools or education; it doesn’t reduce class sizes or provide more teachers of the arts, more libraries, or more resources for the schools that need them most. It is a fast-track to privatization. We still need to see a proof point to show that privatization has anything to do with improving education.
We know what good education is, and it is not produced by driving out experienced teachers and bringing in low-wage, inexperienced temps and new technology. For examples, look at the best public and private schools in Ohio or any other state. What do they value? Experienced teachers, small classes, the arts, well-maintained facilities, and a supportive community. Neither charters nor vouchers produces those conditions.
The irony of the Youngstown plan is that, as Stephen Dyer of Innovation Ohio showed with state data, the charter schools in Youngstown do not perform as well as the public schools that Governor Kasich wants to get rid of. If the state wants to improve test scores in Youngstown, it should close down those low-performing charter schools.

“For examples, look at the best public and private schools in Ohio or any other state. What do they value? Experienced teachers, small classes, the arts, well-maintained facilities, and a supportive community. … ”
… and teachers lounges!!!
DIANE RAVITCH: “If it were up to Kasich, public education would be replaced with charters and vouchers, unions would be banned, and teachers would serve at-will.
“Kasich blew his cover the other day. He said if he were king, he would eliminate teachers’ lounges, so that teachers could not congregate and complain. Free speech seems to be a problem for Kasich.”
LikeLike
Who has time for teachers lounges?
LikeLike
Here’s what’s REALLY scary: Katich is coming across to too many people as a “reasonable alternative” to the other extreme Republican candidates running for POTUS!
LikeLike
This is really scary too – I live in Youngstown, OH. I know all that Kasich did to the state. and I still say he IS the most reasonable person running on the Republican ticket. I’m voting Democrat, but if there is a Republican in the White House out of this bunch I’d rather it be him than Trump or a zealot.
LikeLike
Kasich is zealous, in his opposition to labor and, in his support for anti-democracy ALEC. He surrounds himself with corruptible people. He feels no guilt about the millions of dollars lost by Ohio pensioners in the failure of his firm, Lehman Bros.
LikeLike
I have to wonder if Arne knew all about this before awarding a yachtload of money to Ohio for charters.
LikeLike
The state is lobbying the Obama Administration to release the funding to open more charter schools:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2015/12/17/1-repairing-the-damage.html
That will be the legacy of the Obama Administration in Ohio- more and more charter schools.
I listened to the President campaign in this state in ’08 and again in ’12 and I don’t recall him telling the public his goal was to privatize more and more public schools or promote “dismissal” of a union contract. Why don’t ed reformers run on their actual agenda instead of this “agnostic” nonsense? They’re obviously promoting charter schools over public schools. Why not just tell voters that and then we can have a real public debate? Does the public want to privatize schools? How will we know if ed reform politicians refuse to debate their plans?
LikeLike
In fact, in ’08 he presented himself as a supporter of public schools and got the union endorsement. He even made a speech against ‘bubble tests.’ Linda Darling Hammond led his transition team. Then, he showed his true nature, prevaricator in chief. All we got was Duncan and charters, much worse than expected.
LikeLike
I love how “dismissal of existing contract with the union” starts as a priority and then completely disappears in subsequent emails and is replaced by “”establish a kitchen cabinet” where the cabinet members have already been chosen.
LikeLike
I read a lot of the ed reform “movement” people in government. This is an Obama Administration staff member reflecting on his work:
“I also leave ED having never heard one conversation about privatizing education. Everyone I know there wants strong public schools.”
I think it is amazing we have reached this point- that people in the Obama Administration feel they have to insist that, yes, they DO support public schools.
That’s a pretty low bar for government: “contrary to popular belief, we don’t, actually seek to eliminate public schools”. I don’t know- are we supposed to be grateful that they’ll allow us to keep our public school system(s)?
https://twitter.com/cameronated
LikeLike
“No discussion of privatized education”? A lie?
We know Hansen scrubbed data. And, if Plunderbund’s reporting is accurate, Ross’ statement was false. I believe there was intent to deceive,
LikeLike
In Obama’s perverse world, charters ARE public schools. Most parents, teachers, and scholars do not share this definition of public education.
LikeLike
The definition is not shared, because it is absurd to call charter schools, public schools. The correct analogy is a contractor.
(1) Ohio’s Supreme Court ruled charter school assets don’t belong to taxpayers. (2) Precedent is used to protect expense data, as a proprietary right of a business. (3) Charter boards are not democratically elected. (4) Accountability is limited to contract performance, aligned with specifications.
Any similarity based solely on receipt of taxpayer money, while there are so many points of difference, stretches both reason and credulity.
LikeLike
Kasich is a complete moron every debate and polling numbers show that this jerk has about 1 percent of the vote for president. People know this guy is a complete jerk. His body language and speech are just two points highlighted as to why people do not like this idiot. Then, one debate night jerk off kasich tried to go after donald trump and trump shot him down and out so say goodbye to kasich after presidential election we wont be hearing from him anymore unless your in ohio and if you are good luck
LikeLike
“retired teacher
December 21, 2015 at 9:51 am
In Obama’s perverse world, charters ARE public schools”
DC is madly in love with charters. It reminds me of when they all jumped on the “deregulate the finance sector” bandwagon in the 1990’s. Anyone who thought it was reckless or ill-advised was immediately marginalized and labeled a “traditionalist” – standing in the way of progress. Greenspan was the head cheerleader and all of DC followed behind him.
LikeLike
It is obscene that the feds and states keep tossing more money into charters while public education continues to scramble under constant austerity conditions. They continue to pull the charter bait and switch without any citizen input or accountability for charters. It’s time for a taxpayer revolt.
LikeLike
Most of the blame for Kasich’s reign must be laid at the feet of the so-called leadership of the state Democratic Party. Starting with a complete inability to define Kasich when he won against Strickland, then fielding an absolute vacuous empty suit named FitzGerald, through a lack of responding to his rapacious policies that reward his friends, the party has been a gutless reflection of the Debbie Wasserman Schultz era. If Democrats can’t articulate what they stand for, should Kasich’s “success” be surprising?
LikeLike
With hope, David Pepper will do a better job than Redfern. Any insight into why Redfern was effective in fighting Senate Bill 5 and ineffective, the following election cycle?
LikeLike
Well, I don’t have any insight, but I think the SB 5 fight was led more by unions than the Dem Party–who I think just rode the coattails. The fact that Kasich and the Ohio Assembly is gearing up for a replay tells me they think the Dems will somehow fail to respond. Pepper is much like FitzGerald/Redfern/Wasserman Schultz (why can’t they figure out that Sherrod Brown knows how to do this?), his opinions are driven by a timid reading of the polls, not a core understanding of what principles define a Democrat. Hint to Pepper: start at the Four Freedoms, move your way up and steer clear of Clintonian triangulation.
LikeLike
If you’re right, does the cost of the S.B. 5 fight, prohibit its repeat
during legislative elections? Or, is there worry about worker burn-out from repetitive fights? Or, is there a fear that workers are attached to second amendment, abortion foe politicians?
Pepper described Marc Dann, as “not ready for prime-time”. The statement reflects a lack of understanding about the underlying cause of Dann’s failure.
LikeLike
Plunderbund has continued to post more information about Ross’s direct role:
http://www.plunderbund.com/2015/12/21/evidence-directly-links-ode-superintendent-dick-ross-to-creation-of-youngstown-schools-cabinet/
http://www.plunderbund.com/2015/12/22/youngstown-cabinet-kept-meetings-secret-while-ode-superintendent-dick-ross-developed-takeover-plan/
LikeLike
It will be a wonderful day for Ohio when John Kasich walks out of his office permanently.
LikeLike