Journalist Yasha Levine wrote the single most comprehensive article about the “so-called” Parent Trigger and the takeover of the Desert Trails Elementary School in Adelanto, California.
Levine went to Adelanto to interview parents and teachers. He immersed himself in the issue.
The article is timely because a few days ago, the Adelanto school board refused to renew the charter for Desert Trails charter schools. Read Levine’s article for context.
It starts like this:
When NSFWCORP sent me to Victorville this January, I little expected that the neighboring town of Adelanto would become ground zero for a fight between billionaires on one side, and poor, vulnerable minority parents and children on the other.
I first heard about the fight through the local right-wing paper, the Victorville Daily Press, which gleefully announced on its front page that a local school, Desert Trails Elementary, had just made history as the first school in the nation to be privatized under California’s new “parent trigger” law. The paper described the takeover as “promising a fresh start to the failing elementary school,” and claimed it had received widespread support from parents.
The national press gushed in similarly glowing terms. The LA Weekly described the Adelanto privatization as an “historic moment for the education-reform movement picking up steam across the nation.” The New York Times dutifully compared the takeover of Desert Trails to “Won’t Back Down.” An “issues” movie starring Face of Indie Maggie Gyllenhaal, “Won’t Back Down” promotes the parent-trigger law as a panacea for America’s public-education problems, one that “empowers” parents to fight back against self-interested public school teachers and their union.
All in all, everyone agreed that this takeover of Desert Trails Elementary represented a triumphant moment for parents and their children, a victory for the people over rapacious elementary school teachers and their unions.
But something didn’t seem right about this story — it was too pat, too much like a triumph-of-the-spirit Disney tale, too much like Maggie’s movie. So I made some calls and started spending some time in Adelanto, to find out what really went on there.
* *
Motorists entering the City of Adelanto are greeted with a big blue sign that reads: “The City With Unlimited Possibilities.” It’s not clear who came up with this slogan, or when. But, these days, the sign is a cruel joke.
Founded in 1915 by the guy who invented the modern electric iron, Adelanto never amounted to much. Mostly it served as pit stop and junkyard to a nearby George Air Force Base. The base closed more than a decade ago, and home values have collapsed since the last real-estate bubble popped. Entire neighborhoods emptied out, and building companies went belly up, leaving behind half-finished “master planned communities” that still stand there, desiccating in the dry heat. Signs advertise brand-new three-bedroom McTractHomes for zero down and $800 a month.
Today, Adelanto is the end of the line. A poor, desert town, the city serves as a dumping ground for low-income minority families who have been squeezed out of the Greater Los Angeles-Orange County region and pushed out over the San Bernardino Mountains into the bleak expanse of the Mojave Desert, where housing is dirt cheap and jobs almost non-existent.
The numbers tell the story: Of the 32,000 people who call Adelanto home, one out of three are below the poverty line. Per-capita income is just under $12,000 — nearly three times lower than the California average, and about as much as the average person earns in Mexico. There are almost no jobs here, and Starbucks ranks among the city’s top-ten employers.
Nearly two-thirds of the population are Latinos, many of them undocumented. Another one in five are African-American. Then there are the 5 percent of the population that the census bureau classifies as “institutionalized,” which is nothing but a wishy-washy bureaucratic way of saying that 1 out of 20 Adelanto residents is currently rotting in jail — a rate five times higher than the national average. Adelanto does not have its own high school, but dropout rates in the neighboring suburb of Victorville, also hard-hit by the subprime bubble, are among the worst in the state — hovering somewhere around 50%.
If you stand at the city’s welcome sign, you can just make out its three major prison facilities: a giant federal prison complex to the north, a brand-new state prison to the west, and just north of that, California’s largest private immigrant deportation facility. The last was built recently by Geo Group, the nation’s second-largest private prison contractor.
* *
I would spend several weeks talking to the parents of children enrolled in Desert Trails Elementary, meeting with them in local taco joints and strip mall diners and talking about what happened. As I had suspected, their version of events turned out not to match the Disney version in national papers.
The parents told me that a Los Angeles-based group calling itself Parent Revolution organized a local campaign to harass and trick them into signing petitions that they thought were meant for simple school improvements. In fact those petitions turned out to be part of a sophisticated campaign to convert their children’s public school into a privately-run charter — something a majority of parents opposed. At times, locals say, the Parent Revolution volunteers’ tactics were so heavy-handed in gathering signatures that they crossed the line into harassment and intimidation. Many parents were misled about what the petition they signed actually meant. Some told me that the intimidation with some of the undocumented Latino residents included bribery and extortion.
They first noticed something was up in the summer of 2011, when small groups of parents decked out in Parent Revolution T-shirts started appearing around town, going door to door to speak to parents of Desert Trails Elementary kids, spreading the word that they were organizing a “parent union” to try to improve the quality of their children’s education.
At that, local parents who’d been involved in school affairs started to grow suspicious. According to several I spoke to, two of the leading members of this new “parent union” had previously served in the school’s Parent Teacher Association, and had resigned amid accusations of improprieties.
Why would they suddenly start a new parent organization? Spite? Revenge? And what exactly was Parent Revolution?

What a wonderful vision of the future: charter schools delivering children straight to the for-profit prisons, either as guards or inmates. Sounds worse than Pottersville.
LikeLike
*** UPDATE … December 15, 2015 ***
The Adelanto school board has put out information
clarifying their position regarding its non-renewal
of the Debra Tarver-led and Parent-Revolution-alled
charter school, Desert Trails Prepatory Academy (DTPA)
putting up this timeline of the most recent events,
with links to all relevant correspondence:
http://www.aesd.net/article/desert-trails-charter-petition-information
“Based on the concerns raised by parents of Desert Trails Preparatory Academy (DTPA) and from members of the public asking for clarification and transparency on what has transpired, the following is a timeline of events involving the DTPA charter renewal petition and extension request.”
The upshot of this is the same:
— the district will not approve the renewal of either
DTPA’s charter or its agreement to use the facilities without
Tarver — along with the various charter corporations involved — first
instituting major reforms in its governance, financial practices,
accountability to the Adeanto board, etc … reforms that
must be negotiated with the board.
MEANWHILE
— Tarver is refusing change anything, nor even admit
that anything needs to be changed… As before,
she’s still saying, “Just give us
the two-year extension for both the charter and
use of the building with no strings attached, no
more questions asked.. Just basically renew us
and butt the-hell out of operations.”
Reading the timeline and the correspondence
is enlightening. Tarver wrote and distributed
a false and misleading letter to the district,
then distributed this to the parents.
The letter falsely asserted that Adelanto
district board had changed course and
would renew the two agreements unconditionally,
and that the Tarver and her charter folks were
happily accepting this offer (with only a change
in a timeline.)
Writing this, then giving it out to parents seems an attempt
to fabricate a scenario where Tarver can later tell
the parents at her charter that the Adelanto board
reneged on a promise and double-crossed them —
making Tarver & Co. victims, and the Adelanto
board the villaains.
The letter is apparently in total contradiction to
Adelanto board’s November non-renewal motion, which
included the major concerns that caused the non-renewal.
Again, here’s that resolution:
Click to access Resolution_No_15-16-09.pdf
The initial motion of non-renewal didn’t
rule out any possible reversal of the non-renewal.
Indeed, the Adelanto board made an offer to “negotiate” —
i.e. negotiation that would result in necessary and
mandatory reforms —with Tarver and her charter folks.
Instituting those negotiated reforms would be an absolute
and necessary pre-condition of any renewal of either
of the two major agreements — the charter & the
facilities agreement
Here’s Tarver’s false and misleading letter to the Adelanto
board, which she, again, passed out to all her parents:
Click to access Dec_4_Request_for_two_year_extension.pdf
The Adelanto school board responded that it never
made an unconditional offer to renew. Its letter responding
to Tarver’s included an excerpt from an earlier letter in which it clearly
stated that any renewal was, is, and always will be conditional on reforms,
and that the Adelanto board was only open to “negotiate”
a renewal that would ultimately result in these reforms being instituted.
If Tarver refused to agree to this and refused to “negotiate”, the
non-renewal will stand and the school will close in May.
The board states that Tarver continues
to refuse any such negotiation, and resist any such
negotiated reforms.
Here’s the Adelanto’s school board’s letter to Tarver
and the charter fokls— which includes a demand that
this letter be distributed to the parents at her school (i.e. stop
lying to them as part of your attempt to trick them,
manipulate them, fabricate victimhood, etc) :
Click to access Dec_9_Letter.pdf
My guess is that Tarver will then take this to court, and
hope that they get the kind of judge (or the same exact judge)
that made the incredible ruling that parents would not be
allowed to rescind their signatures, even if those parents
were lied to and tricked into signing a petition that they
otherwise would never have signed.
See you in court in 2016, Debra!
LikeLike
Ohio passed parent trigger in their continuing effort to adopt each and every nationally-promoted ed reform that crosses anyone’s desk and this was the result:
“As the law was to go into effect for the first time a year ago, some district officials feared a disruptive storm of building takeovers. But the result wasn’t even a drizzle: Supporters could identify no one — not one person — who was interested in submitting a petition to the district treasurer to take over any school by the deadline on Dec. 31, 2014.”
Just once I would like someone in power in this state to say “no” to the national ed reform lobbyists. They have subjected public schools to an absolute blizzard of “reforms” for 15 years now. Each ed reform group has their pet program or initiative and Ohio lawmakers adopt ALL of them and dump the whole chaotic, incoherent mess on public schools. There’s never any follow-up or funding or commitment to any one thing, so these experiments are never proved or disproved – they’re all judged successes until the next round of gimmicks is adopted.
LikeLike
This is all so corrupt. The reason I post here is not because I think charter schools are “evil”, but because the charter school movement has been taken over by people who are dishonest and allowing people with no ethical standards to run publicly-funded schools is a terrible thing.
Why couldn’t those pro-charter folks in California be completely forthright about what they wanted? Why would they have parents sign petitions on false pretenses? Can’t they just say this really great charter school could come in and take over? Nope, they can’t.
The description of canvassing for signatures is exactly what Success Academy does, by the way. That’s how I got so interested in their “bad practices” and was confronted by their lies. I walked down the street where paid canvassers told me they were collecting signatures for “a new school” to help the overcrowding. Now what parent in an overcrowded district wouldn’t think that it would be a good idea to open another public school? Then I saw Success Academy claiming their was a HUGE demand for their charter school from local parents! I was shocked that they could be so dishonest, and the more media reports I read, the more lies I kept seeing! I suspect if Success Academy had been an honest charter school like Brooklyn Prospect I would not be all that concerned with charter schools. But allowing unethical operators to keep getting more and more schools under false pretenses? That’s just wrong. And every time I see their misleading lies posted here, I only feel more disgust for a movement that has completely lost its way.
LikeLike
It goes against the basic premise of public schools to have current parents “vote” on whether to privatize the school or not.
The current set of parents don’t own a public school. The whole community does, because the whole community pays for it and is invested in it.
It’s like polling the people sitting in a public library on whether to privatize the library or not. It’s not just up to those specific people.
This is such a basic premise of small “d” democratic principles that it really says something scary about the “movement” that they rolled right over it.
LikeLike
This is how you handle those SUCCESS ACADEMY douchebag recruiters.
A couple years back, Eva’s winged monkey recruiters had been lurking outside traditional public schools in a more upscale New York City neighborhood where Eva was about to open a school, accosting parents with a sales pitch to ditch their public school for one of Eva’s test prep factories.
Unlike the uninformed lower income immigrant community folks and were dkuped, these folks knew what these recruiters were all about.
The parents and teachers then got in the face of one of them, with the confrontation captured on video: (is he wearing one of Success Academy’s L.L. Bean’s backpacks?)
I’m urging parent leaders Karen Wolfe and Adam Benitez, and teacher union leaders to like UTLA President Alex C-P
to play this video to every parent and teacher, respectively
that each of them can get to watch it.
The Broad Plan will unleash hundreds of these
paid recruiters to accost parent and student at
our traditional public schools., in an effort to
poach the students attending public schools.
Get lost, you money-motivated charter shills!!!!
One of the teachers / parents here was Jamie Fidler, a nationally
renown teacher who came into prominence in the documentary
AMERICAN TEACHER (a mixed bag of a film, but that’s
another story).
They kept protesting, and Eva’s winged monkeys were
never seen again.
HAPPY ENDING
… or better yet, here’s some video confronting Parent Revolution organizers outside Weigand Elementary, in South Los Angeles:
and here:
When things calmed down, here’s an account from two parents: (Sorry, it’s in Spanish… )
And from one teacher: (again, it’s in Spanish … I believe the words in the title are “lying” and “violence”):
LikeLike
Jack, even though I don’t like recruiters, that isn’t my problem. The recruiter in the video at least was HONEST. That’s because Success Academy ALREADY had its’ school in prime Cobble Hill, based on the earlier signature gatherers who were being dishonest. The people gathering signatures acted in the manner of the people who support SA always do — it isn’t an outright LIE to say that they are gathering signature for a new school to help overcrowding in order to drum up fake “support” for your charter school. But why would you want to mislead people that way if you actually think your school is good?
There is only one reason for that. It is because deep down you know your school is doing all the reprehensible practices people say it is.
That’s why Eva Moskowitz goes on national television to claim that when 20 – 24% of the low-income minority 5 year olds are suspended, it’s only because they are truly violent. How awful for her to say that about so many, many children, and be able to get away with it because of her supporters who seem to agree that it “could” be true!
The charter school in California also knew that they couldn’t get parent support if they were HONEST. That’s why they lie. But the people who believe in those lies are the same people who believe that the Republican candidates for President always tell the truth. Some people will believe that no matter how many facts you present them with.
LikeLike
Correction: I should not have said that the paid recruiter at PS 261 was completely honest — he seemed to be using exaggerated claims of the school being best in the state. But he was not dishonestly pretending to gather signatures for a school by doing everything possible to get them to believe it was a public school without absolutely “lying” about it. I consider that kind of deception dishonest but if you believe that the Bush Administration never actually claimed that Saddam Hussein had WMD because they only IMPLIED it over and over again with the intention to deceive, then you can also believe that the pro-charter folks don’t actually “lie” when they do everything they can to convince parents they are NOT signing a petition for a new charter school.
The most outrageous thing about this article is that the judge allowed those falsely obtained signatures to stand!! That judge happily destroyed the public school based on signatures he knew were falsely obtained. What kind of horrible person does that? He should be impeached.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent….you are missing the crux of this charter school onslaught when you ask “why can’t pro charter folks in California be completely forthright about what they wanted”….but then you answer your question by adding “it’s so corrupt.”
What you overlook is the huge fact that this drive to privatize and charterize is nationwide and is fostered by many billionaires all over the country who strive to control all our public services like schools, post offices, banks, prisons, trash collection, net neutrality, communications, hospitals, water, public utilities, etc. They are all active in their over arching fraternity, ALEC.
Yes, it is a combination of greed and corruption that permeates the entire US, and the portion that is the focus of this article, parent trigger laws, started in California with the Parental Empowerment Act of 2010, when Eli Broad and the Waltons donated over $14 Million to Ben Austin to get it going. Broad, along with the richest family in the WORLD the Waltons, were/are partnered in leading the charge for parent trigger laws. Also, the Wasserman Foundation, and others. joined in the financing of Parent Revolution. (See the recent LA Times article on Casey Wasserman.)
Yesterday Diane wrote about Philip Anshutz, a little known billionaire (who owns the parts of downtown LA that is not owned by Eli Broad), and there is also Pete Peterson, and of course, Rupert Murdoch who wrote about this public education takeover in the NY Times some years ago. They join with the leaders such as Eli Broad who developed and installed the infamous Broad Academy in 1999, to train CEOs and Superintendents of Schools.
In 2009, Broad and the Waltons hired conniving lawyer, Ben Austin, an aggressive pro charter instigator with ties to Steve Barr and Green Dot, (Austin was allowed by then LA Mayor Villaraigosa to double dip and work ‘full time’ both as an LA City Attorney paid by the taxpayers, and also for Steve Barr) to be a lobbyist to influence the Ca. Legislature to devise this parent trigger law. (With Broad’s financial help, Villaraigosa hopes to become the next Governor of California. He was instrumental in most of the LAUSD charterizing, and along with Broad, installed Deasy as Supt. with NO other search.)
Austin helped State Senator Gloria Romero write this flawed law for the ‘unstated’ purpose of privatizing inner city schools for free market profit. The plan all along was to use this infamous law to be a exemplar for every state in the union. Austin and Deasy now work full time for Broad on this issue, and also to instigate Vergara-like law suits throughout California and the US. This is not only to kill due process for teachers, but to finally and forever, do away with teachers unions.
Also, Broad Academy has about 2500 grads like John Deasy and Byrd-Bennett. embedded all over the country. They are hired as Superintendents in many major and minor districts. Others are running charter schools. These are not just pseudo educators like Deasy who is being investigated by the FBI and the SEC, nor Byrd-Bennett of Chicago infamy who is under indictment for fraud and bribery, but also business people with no education experience who learn how to run school districts as CEOS on a business model. The goal of this long range insidious plan is to BREAK THE BACK OF THE UNIONS that protect, or should protect, teachers, to install Teach for America recent college grads with only 5 weeks training to replace highly trained teachers, and to find ways to cut costs and preempt unions by firing and jailing teachers en masse.
It is a huge scheme to rule all of the Nation by using the free market and Wall Street for endless profiteering. Such sweeping power and access is not to improve children’s education, but rather to develop a docile and easily manipulated work force.
In LAUSD, Deasy hired Cole-Gutierrez to oversee the charters, and to foster more, and Cortines kept him on to this day, but Cole-Gutierrez had worked for the CCSA and for the now BoE member Refugio Rodriguez, multi millionaire charter school owner. So Broad, Deasy, and even Cortines, made certain that the charter-fox was the overseer of the hen house. (Read about Mrs, Angel and Cole-Gutierrez, often reported about on this site.)
CORRUPT, yes, but your city is only one part of the whole. NY. Los Angeles, Ohio and Chigago are all parts of this takeover.
This week, the LA Times did a huge story on Casey Wasserman, grandson of Hollywood mogul, Lew Wasserman, reported years ago for his ties with the Mafia. Casey is painted as an upstanding scion who wants the best for society and as a young giant philanthropist. This is the LA Times that Broad either owns or is keeps trying to own…but who has complete control of policy as many have reported here..
Do not be deluded into thinking Broad, Waltons, Wasserman, Anshutz, et al, are a California problem….they are working toward ruling all of America. They influence EVERY election at all levels with their vast use of their vast wealth. All candidates have their sweaty hands open wide for Broad and Company to pour in lucre. Citizens United and McCutcheon assures them that they can BUY it all. They own America.
You’ve got it right…CORRUPTION RULES…and it is all over the US.
LikeLike
Thanks, Ellen Lubic, I do see that happening.
However, you left out one additional corruption. The corruption of middle class parents who care only about what is good for their own children and happily ignore abuses of low-income children and the fact that the lies of charter folks justify cutting budgets from the public schools that serve the most needy students that their own charters refuse to educate. Their kid has a charter school that caters to their middle class child, so they support it and pretend to “see no evil”.
I see that with posters on here who defend their beloved “free private school” charter paid for by taxpayer dollars that does everything it can do reward those college educated parents — promising them the world if they will only enroll their “gifted” children — while those fake “progressive” middle class parents happily ignore the atrocious way that very same charter school treats the low-income children who can’t keep up. Charters appeal to the most selfish instincts of middle class parents to advance their agenda.
It’s like the parents at Goethe International Charter School that is mentioned below: They look the other way at the fact that the poorest children closest to the school are PURPOSELY excluded because that means 1. more room for their middle class kids and 2. they don’t have to be in school with the low-income children. And it is #2 that is ALL-IMPORTANT because I notice that the pro-charter middle class folks on here only attend the charter schools that have a smaller portion of low-income kids. They pretend they are supporting charters because they help the kids in failing schools and yet they are more than happy when lots of the kids are drummed out of the charter schools that return them to those very same “failing” public schools. They express faux “shock shock” that public schools are too “segregated” and happily embrace the most segregated policies in their own charter school that keeps out those very kids they despise. These middle class parents even seem to cheer when they hear that 20% of 5 year olds are getting suspended from charter schools — after all, they “deserve it”, according to them. Without all those enabling middle class parents, the corruption in the charter movement would not be able to get as far as they have.
LikeLike
Ellen provides a good recounting of much of the history.
Now for the future…
There is a battle brewing right now in Orange County, California, where school board member Cecilia Iglesias, close ally of Parent Trigger champion Gloria Romero (former State Senator who wrote the law, head of California Democrats for Education Reform, columnist for the Orange County Register newspaper(!)) is setting the stage for the all too common teachers-against-parents narrative on which the Parent Trigger relies. As teachers bring up the deceptive ways that the Parent Trigger gets loaded, Iglesias and Romero claim the teachers are liars.
This is in yesterday’s newspaper: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/parents-694772-schools-union.html
LikeLike
When PRev saw that they were not making headway in LA, they changed their focus to Orange County. Concurrently, Ben Austin left as their leader and went to work full time for his mentor and supplier of cash, Eli Broad. Pseudo surfer dude, Bennie, seems to not worry about sinking lower and lower to garner big bucks, and he now operated directly from the belly of the beast.
Orange County only has lost one school to the PRev charter provocateurs…and the district seems to have wised up quickly as to the underhanded tactics of PRev. Some parents, teachers, and administrators contacted some us early on last winter to discuss how to dodge these devious operators.
Despite that the Orange County Register, which is on the verge of shutting down due to lack of readership and advertisers, features Gloria Romero and her spiteful mendacious columns about charters v. public schools, the billionaire financed workers at PRev seem not to be making much headway using their many underhanded techniques.
But notice that all of these keep addressing charter schools as “public schools” without ever informing the public that the taxpayers foot the bills for essentially private schools with no oversight from public administrators. Salaries, such as we see with Travers huge quarter of a million $$$ in Adelanto, are set by the CEOs appointed Board members of the charter, which can be the CEOs family members. What a deal!
LikeLike
Regarding the latest news out of Adelanto,
you need to … well … here’s some words of
Rodgers & Hammerstein:
01:25 – 01:32
01:25 – 01:32
“Let’s start at the very be-gin-ning.
A very good place … to starrrrrt … ”
Go read that baby ASAP! Here’s another link to it:
https://www.nsfwcorp.com/dispatch/parent-trigger/
Then when you’re done, read Yasha’s follow-up, dealing
with the media’s pro-privatization bias, focusing specifically
on NPR:
https://www.nsfwcorp.com/dispatch/et-tu-npr/
EXCERPT —
——————————-
YASHA LEVINE:
“Lori Yuan, a mother of two kids Desert Trails and a member of Adelanto’s planning commission, described feeling that she was caught in some kind of grand conspiracy that was bigger and more powerful than anything she could imagine.
“ ‘I would do these interviews with these people and reporters and journalists and bloggers. Anyone that would call I would talk to because I need to get this information out because people need to know this. And then I’d get the article and I’d be like this has nothing to f—ing do with what I said.
” ‘I got to the point when I started thinking, do they — and by they, I mean Parent Revolution — do they own everything? [D]o they own the newspapers?’
“It’s easy to paint this as the paranoia of parents who feel like the media doesn’t understand their concern about parent trigger. That was my first impulse too. And then I started reading some of the coverage.
“It didn’t matter if it was Fox News, NPR, the Washington Post, LA Weekly or the local right-wing newspaper: coverage of parent trigger issues would invariably have the same pro-privatization bias, even down to their use of the same stock phrases about “parent empowerment” and the need give parents the ability to ‘reform’ a system that protects lazy public school teachers and their sleazy their union cronies.”
—————–
and it goes on from there, with detailed quoting from media coverage.
LikeLike
Public radio, WNYC, in New York, broadcasts Steven Levitt’s controversial Freakonomics. I assume 90+ % of talk radio, including public radio, has become right wing.
LikeLike
This post is an article that is from April 2013, is there an update?
I found this from last year:
“Former Desert Trails Prep teacher Rachel Garvin Villarreal said staff at the school started focusing on test preparation after February, and she did notice improvements. Villarreal said she was not asked back to teach at the school this year along with three others. She said she was given no reason why.”
http://m.vvdailypress.com/article/20141122/News/141129926
LikeLike
Et tu NPR indeed:
In 2012, the Walton Family foundation gave Rhee’s StudentsFirst $2 million. That same year, it cut NPR a hefty check for $1.4 million. The foundation classified both handouts—one to a respected news organization; the other to a notorious astroturf outfit—as “K-12 Education Reform Grants” to “Shape Public Policy.”
LikeLike
Richard, the update is that the local school board is voted to shut it down at the end of the year — technically the term is “non-renewal”. Keep in mind that this is a board filled with people that the Charter and its backer Parent Revolution spend big money to place there, ostensibly to preserve the charter takeover.
In short, the puppets looked a little deeper into the corrupt behind-the-scenes machinations of Tarver & Co.. As a result, they demanded more oversight, and more transparency, and major reforms in their financial and administrative practices.
Tarver refused.
At that point, the puppets cut their strings, then turned on their puppet-masters with a vengeance, ordering a shut-down of the school at the end of the 2015-2016 school year.
Read about it here, on this site — with links to the news coverage:
and also here…
Tarver is now vowing to take this new school board to court, like she did the prior board, to keep her charter operating.
ONE MORE THING:
In violation of state law, Tarver employed uncredentialed teachers at her school (when asked, she “refused to confirm or deny” that she did so).
This is at:
http://capitalandmain.com/features/california-expose/adelanto-report-card-year-zero-of-the-parent-trigger-revolution/
————————–
BILL RADEN OF Capital & Main (October 16, 2015) :
“ ‘They (Tarver and her underlings) just told lies to cover themselves over and over and over again, and they contradicted themselves left and right,’ said Nani Colmer. ‘So many things were done in defense of things that they did in the past, and then we paid the price for it.’
“One of those lies appears to involve teacher credentialing.
“The state’s education code is explicit on credentials. Section 47605(l) requires that …
” ‘Teachers in charter schools shall hold a Commission on Teacher Credentialing certificate, permit, or other document equivalent to that which a teacher in other public schools would be required to hold.’
“However, the online database of the state’s Commission on Teaching Credentialing (CTC), indicates that for 2013-14 Desert Trails kindergarten teacher Elfie Landa didn’t receive a preliminary Multiple Subject credential until July 24 of this year. (Landa left Desert Trails during the current term.)
“And the database turns up only an emergency, 30-Day Substitute Teaching Permit (issued March 21, 2014) for Honey Welker, a third grade level teaching lead last year, who took over Colmer’s third grade classroom mid-year.
“Tarver refused to confirm or deny that she used uncredentialed teachers in the classroom last year, and instead insisted repeatedly that Desert Trails passed a credentialing audit conducted by the Adelanto Elementary School District last April.”
——————-
That last part is key, because back then (April 2014) the then-pro-Tarver Adelanto Board looked the other way, and let Tarver get away with it when she was violating the law by using uncredentialed teachers.
That’s all over now. The Board wants the school closed.
LikeLike
The oligarch foundations appear to be in charge of the Democratic U.S. Dept. of Ed. so, NPR, fronting for them, is not a surprise. As David Sirota said, PBS stands for Plutocratic Broadcasting System.
LikeLike
A couple of the people that Levine interviewed went on to vandalize the new Desert Trails. Perhaps Levine should have also talked to more of the law-abiding citizens who live in the area or even Adelanto district employees who knew something would one day give in this district that does its own thing.
LikeLike
Huh, “Changemaker”? How ’bout a link?
LikeLike
Please readers, consider that Changemaker probably works for PRev. All his/her statements about Adelanto must be viewed with askance since this person has always refused to identify them self.
LikeLike
Richard Holsworth and Ellen Lubic: no surprise—it was only a matter of time before s/he played the “Trump” card.
I have no problem if the information can be substantiated, but even then, context, significance and relevance is critical, as in the case of the young woman in the SC classroom who was assaulted by a police office.
Right now, it just looks like the typical rheephorm sneer, jeer and smear.
😎
LikeLike
And what does that make the rest of us: status quo? Hahahahaha.
LikeLike
There’s so many videos I could post on this site
about LAUSD Charter School fiasco. It one instance where
Deasy took the right position, against Charter School
cherry-picking.
Here’s one about Goethe International Charter School:
Back in 2011, the Goethe charterschool officials are
seeking a renewal of their charter, and an expansion from
their current set up of Grades K-to-5, to add grades 6-8.
Unfortunately, in its five years of existence,
Goethe’s student body has somehow ended with
a student body that is 90% white and
only 10% non-white. Meanwhile, the
nearby public schools — including the one
where Goethe is co-located — are 10% white, and
90% non-white (black & Latino).
This video is also a case study in how important
the role of LAUSD Board President is.
Former LAUSD Board President Monica Garcia
allows a parade of Goethe folks bragging about
their support for, and efforts to have diversity at
Goethe.
(NOTE: Garcia was deposed in 2013 when the
corporate reformers lost their majority on the board …
Zimmer thankfully isnow LAUSD Board President)
Well, then, if — according that parade of speakers
bragging about Goethe Charter’s pledge to diversity
in both the school’s management and outreach —
the how in-Hell did that 90% white student body
thing happen?
That is a question that nobody will touch…
until Zimmer brings it up, and demands that
the LAUSD’s Charter School Office Director
answer it.
I can only describe the montage of Goethe’s
highly-staged parade of speakers
making empty pledges toward diversity
—alternated with bursts of applause from
the T-shirted crowd bused in for the occasion—
at the beginning of this video as
a classic example of what Soviet film theorist
and director Sergei Eisenstein might call
“sarcastic” editing. Watch it:
Oh… and you notice that the T-shirted crowd,
and most of the speakers are black and brown
folks, even though that flies in the face of what
Zimmer points out are “the actual numbers.”
The one opposing speaker says, “I’m a leader
in the Latino community (in the community
where Goethe is located), and I live in the
community, and I’ve never seen any of these
people (i.e. the Goethe speakers.).”
However, here’s where the power of the LAUSD
Board Presidency comes in. As Chair, Garcia
follows her corporate masters’ marching orders
and blocks any more of the non-Goethe parents and
community members opposing Goethe from
getting the mic.
These parents are pissed off about Goethe’s lack of
diversity, doubly so when they had to sit through
that ridiculous montage of speakers claiming they
want diversity. They also decry the invasion and
seizing of classroom space by Goethe, and the
damaging effect this will have on special ed students.
Now, here’s where it gets good. Zimmer — just
two years into his term, having taken office in
July 2009 — doesn’t not buy this staged fiasco
for one second. He proceeds to go quietly apesh#% on
the Goethe Charter people, and on LAUSD’s charter
school office Director Jose Cole-Gutterez, who was
placed there by Deasy to do everything to defend
and expand charters in LAUSD.
Somebody said about Cole-Guttierez: “You can’t
be a refereee (his real job evaluating which charter
schools should be opened, or if opened, later
closed) and a cheerleader (what he’s actually doing,
as evidenced in this video) at the same time.”
(It’s moments like this that later led the
charter folks to pour $5 million into the coffers of Zimmer’s
corporate stooge opponent Kate Anderson… in
Kate’s ultimately failed bid to replace Zimmer on
the Board.)
First, think of a map of East Germany before the fall,
with the island of capitalist West Berlin surrounded by
Communist East Germany.
Zimmer notices something similar in the map
of the Goethe’s charter school application. They
claim to serve a certain geographic area, but
as with West Berlin on the East German map, he notices that
one area — defined by a ZIP Code 90230 — is not
included in the which children will be allowed
to attend Goethe charter school.
He points out that this ZIP Code 90320 includes
the low-income minority housing projects!!!!
Indeed, IT’S ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE
SCHOOL SITE WHERE GOETHE CHARTER IS
CO-LOCATED!!!
WTF????!!!!
It sticks out like West Berlin on an old East
German map (my analogy, btw, not Steve’s … I
wasn’t writing his speeches then… or now. ;- ) )
( 04:07)
( 04:07)
STEVE ZIMMER:
— (after listing the included ZIP Codes)
“Why is the (ZIP Code) 90320 not included?”
— DISSOLVE —
“(90320) includes the Mar Vista Gardens
Housing Projects. Over 650 families who live
in that project are the primary students who,
if we’ll be honest.
— (to Charter Shill, Jose Cole-Gutteirez, LAUSD
Director of Charters)
“So my question for you and the charter office
is …
” ‘How could you let this (omission of 90320
& its projects-dwelling kids from Goethe) get by,
and not (question it) … ?’
“I mean, you’re bringing this to us with a
recommendation to (renew & expand Goethe charter)
but (90320) is literally a block across the
street at Centinela (from Goethe’s co-located school site),
and that ZIP Code (90320) is NOT included?
And ZIP Codes that are 2 to 3 to 4 miles away
ARE included?
“How could that happen?”
(Now watch a charter shill spew forth some double talk)
JOSE-COLE GUTTIEREZ:
“First, let me say a couple things. First, in addition
to ZIP Codes and … I will acknowledge that I
don’t have the exact response for (the exclusion of)
that Zip Code (from Goethe’s student body) …
but one of the factors we do look at are … what
are the schools that current residents are
would be otherwise attending? … Our analysis…
it’s solely not the ZIP Codes, but where students are
currently coming from in the neighboring area… ”
(JOSE C-G totally dodges the question, but
Zimmer ain’t havin’ it.)
STEVE ZIMMER:
“It’s a stunning omission when the most diverse —
especially for Latino and African-American families —
the most diverse ZIP Code is not included in the
target market. So it calls into (question) …
My question is actually not for (Goethe officials)…
it’s for you… like… I mean… I’m in that neighborhood
all the time. I know who’s there (i.e. who lives there.)
“The question… my concern is…
I am willing to accept what folks say on face value.
If folks want to talk about diversity, and make a
pledge to diversity… I support Dr. Deasy (in charter
schools having student bodies with diversity.)
” … ”
“What Dr. Deasy says, and what I urge my colleagues
to support is … let’s work on this… ”
“Show us in the elementary level, in the school that
you have now, that those numbers can change, and
that you’ll get there (address the lack of diversity) … and
we’ll gladly consider expanding the grade level.”
“The diversity picture that was painted (by the speakers)
today was a beautiful picture of Los Angeles,
but that doesn’t play out in the (actual) numbers
(of who actually attends the school), and unless you can
tell me that this plays out in the numbers … it just doesn’t.
It doesn’t match in special education
It doesn’t match in free-and-reduced lunch
It doesn’t match in the other demographic.”
Again, to be fair, Deasy also believes this this exclusion
of 90230 should no be allowed.
Charterista Board Member Yolie Flores
then tries to change the topic by bringing up an
irrelevant urban legend — teacher union folks gave fliers
to parents warning them that if they attended a charter
that they would be deported.
This is a total lie. UTLA then and now denies this…
but it was part of Ben Austin’s (and others’) disinformation
campaign.
The late great Marguritte LaMotte then chimes in,
supporting Zimmer. She decries the lack of “access”,
as demonstrated by Goethe’s exclusion of ZIP Code 90320.
Under pressure, Garcia allows two people opposing
Goethe’s expansion to speak… (also… Goethe is also co-locating
at Marina Del Rey Middle School, so that its proposed expansion
will displace those public school students attending there,
specifically Special Ed. Students).
A special needs parent — not paid by anyone, not affiliated with
any group — then gets up and opens a can of whoop-ass on
Goethe. He decries the lack of notice to parents opposing
Goethe’s expansion, and how Goethe’s actions, and those
actions detrimental effect on special ed students. goes against the settlement
that LAUSD made regarding Special Education (Consent Decree)
He says Goethe has only 16 special ed students, and most of them
are the least disabled — speech — and the school does not
include the most disabled students.
SPECIAL ED. PARENT:
“Essentially what’s happening, is that there’s cherry-picking
going on here. Special needs kids are being displaced (to
accommodate the expansion of Goethe.)
Finally, a Special Ed. Teacher chimes in.
SPECIAL ED TEACHER:
“The crux of this is that I believe that (charter schools’ exclusionary
policies) are running afoul of the 14th Amendment.
I strongly believe so. Charter schools, because of
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND, have an incentive to
keep away Special Ed. kids. We (the student body
at Marina Del Rey Middle School) are 90%
poverty, we are 90% minority, and those very
kids that (Goethe) does not serve. (Goethe)
wants that very space.”
Goethe ended up getting four more classrooms,
but its request to expand to Grades 6, 7, & 8 are denied.
As the video’s closing caption illustrated, taking
back those 4 classrooms would require an act of
the California legislature.
LikeLike
Are you serious that this charter school EXCLUDED the housing project that was located right across the street from their school? In favor of an affluent neighborhood 2 miles away?
Did they continue to do that after this meeting? Not that I am surprised.
LikeLike
Jack…with all this great info, you left out the big portion of the BoE presidency of Richard Vladovic who was pummeled by Galatzan and her pro Deasy supporters to the point that he backed down and voted with their side out of fear it seemed, that his somewhat shady past would be exposed. Please expand on this long destructive official head of the LAUSD BoE and how it affected Deasy edicts, squandered public money as with iPad and MiSiS fiascos, lawsuits, and even the secret meetings re renewing the Deasy contract over the protest of 91% of teachers who voted NO CONFIDENCE in Deasy. And of course how now LAUSD is left too close to bankruptcy by this Broad/Deasy onslaught. In less than 4 years, with Vlad at the helm, Deasy ran up losses of over $700 million.
Sadly, Zimmer too often joined Vlad (and Garcia and Galatzan) in a plethora of bad votes in support of Deasy. Only La Motte, and generally Ratliff, and sometimes Bennett, voted then, for teachers, students, and taxpayers.
LikeLike
addendum…it was also under the Vladovic administration of the BoE, that they allowed, and colluded with, United Way, Parent Revolution, and even Ca. Endowment and Public Counsel among non profits, and representatives of many of the biggest law firms, and yes, even Yolie Flores, to produce the infamous day of orchestrated street theater on Oct. 29, 2013. and spent tens of thousands of dollars bussing in to the School Board meeting, hundreds of inner city paid shills to support Deasy. It was a festival of corruption that the BoE allowed only this carefully selected band of actors to testify in favor of Deasy in the Public Board Room at Beaudry, and they turned away, very rudely, all those of us who wanted to speak against renewing Deasy’s contract. This Board made many, if not blatantlyillegal, certainly immoral decisions.
And Deasy had and still has the nerve to call all this, and his, Austin’s, and Broad’s activities, “Civil Rights.”
LikeLike
“Adelanto PC Chairwoman Hit With School Vandalism Charge,” is the title of the San Bernardino County Sentinel newspaper article of Jan. 3, 2014. Sorry, I couldn’t provide a link.
LikeLike
I don’t know much about Adelanto, but I do know that you haven’t addressed the fact that the signatures were obtained under false pretenses and that the school made its CEO rich while starving its students of supplies.
I also know that you represent everything that is wrong in America today. You can’t actually have an honest argument about the advantages of a charter school that obviously is corrupt. It’s sad. I imagine you are well-paid to try to distract people from that corruption by posting on here. Because if you actually believe in such a corrupt system, it’s scary.
LikeLike
By the way, I occasionally see stories about corrupt public school principals and I am thrilled that the corruption is being weeded out. What is most reprehensible about charter folks is their desperation to cover up all the corruption. Scary.
LikeLike
Changemaker:
There is another relevant fact that I forgot to mention in the posts about the Desert Trails Charter School.
It is not the first charter school in Adelanto. The first one was called the Adelanto Charter Academy. It didn’t last long. It was closed after revelations that the founders were engaged in financial self-dealing.
LikeLike
The Adelanto Charter Academy was not begun by Parent Revolution or the Parent Trigger Law being pulled. I simply believe that if you don’t believe in a law (Parent Trigger) you work to change it by going through the legal process not by vandalizing the newly created Desert Trails School, or by (as an Adelanto Board member did after the judges ruling) screaming, “You can take me out in handcuffs; we’re not giving that school over. (paraphrase, but all this was in the newspapers at the time.) Why is no one asking what will the Adelanto School District do now, with a new superintendent (the last one was driven out) to make sure that DT isn’t one of the lowest scoring in the state again for another decade? What will they do differently? In the past the state has put them in school improvement and has withdrawn ELD funds. None of it made any difference. Plus, many on the “inside” of Adelanto School District were helping Parent Revolution because they were at their wits’ end. Contrary to what many think, I am not pro either side and I am reading with concern what others are writing knowing there are two sides to every issue and that the media can make things look like they want. I don’t give my name because I don’t want to be threatened by someone on one side or the other. I thought, too, that educators were supposed to teach their students not to name call (“surfing dude”?) and to back statements up with facts. You can bet I will be fact-checking on the Tarver and other accusations which we all should be doing.
LikeLike
“The Adelanto Charter Academy was not begun by Parent Revolution or the Parent Trigger Law being pulled.”
No one stated or implied the above.
😳
LikeLike
Changemaker,
The Adelanto Charter Academy predated the Parent Trigger law and the billionaire-funded “Parent Revolution.”
My point, which you missed, was that Adelanto had previously had experience with a charter school and had a hard lesson in holding it accountable or financially transparent. Adelanto parents were not longing for a charter school. Only 50 parents in a school of 600 children picked the charter operator.
LikeLike
Your claim to be impartial just doesn’t ring true, changemaker.
Let’s say you are telling the truth. If so, you would know MORE about the issue and not simply come up with a link to the article about the so-called vandalism in an effort to shut down criticism. Now you pretend not to know anything else and you want to “check it out”? It’s already been in the news out there and anyone who cared enough to hunt down the article about the vandalism would know it.
Is the charter school acting in a way that an organization whose PRIME focus was to provide the best education for kids and not to pay themselves high salaries or hire connected consultants? It sure doesn’t sound like it. Are you claiming it IS? You believe that charter school is spending every penny educating children in the best possible way? You think the board that is full of their supporters is concerned for absolutely no reason?
If you were who you claim to be — a neutral observer — you would have acknowledged some of the obvious problems while possibly mentioning some good things. But — typical of the charter folks — you just seem to be dishonest about your intentions. You all seem to defend the most reprehensible practices of charter schools or just try to distract people from looking at them by saying “hey, look over here at a public school principal who did something bad”. You seem to have as much desire for an honest discussion as most of the other pro-charter folks who post here do.
LikeLike
Dear changemaker,
Please just read the entire article, and to the best of your ability read it with an open mind.
Again, here it is:
https://www.nsfwcorp.com/dispatch/parent-trigger/
LikeLike
Changemaker,
I am interested in the concrete suggestions you have for the American people once they realize that the U.S. Dept. of Ed. is a revolving door among plutocratic venture foundations, industry and government. What should the people do when they learn that their state and local politicians are receiving money from people who plot, to profit from privatizing public education? What should they do, after they read research that shows that the U.S. Congress doesn’t listen to 90% of Americans?
LikeLike