In this post, a high school history teacher says that his students are utterly confused by the new requirements for high school graduation.
So is the teacher.
“Fortunately for our students, the ODE has made the path to graduation simpler by making it more complex. Students may graduate through an acceptable score on a certification in a vocational field. OR They may graduate through receiving a remediation free score on a college entrance test (scores not yet verified). OR They may graduate by earning 18 combined points on the aforementioned state assessments with a minimum of 4 points from 2 assessments in mathematics, a minimum of 4 points from 2 assessments in English Language Arts, and a minimum of 6 points from assessments in Biology, American History, and American Government equaling a total of 14 points with the 4 additional points picked up when students score 3 or higher, which is to say “Proficient or Above.”
“Does that make sense? My sophomores couldn’t explain it to me either, and they’re expected to graduate under that system. Fear not, I provided a thorough and engaging explanation replete with visual aids and low brow humor that seemed to do the trick. I could not, however, provide them with a satisfactory explanation as to why they “have to deal with this sh*t.” (Their words, not mine)….
“Look, maybe my scenario here is confusing. On a very basic level, this new testing system is terribly problematic. The issues lie in the fact that it is new, and being created as we go, but also in the nature of the convoluted paths to graduation themselves. The sheer number of variables at play here are impossible to fathom, from student strengths to test performance, low scores in these areas, but not those, 2 points here, other scores there, nothing formalized until very late. Now, take this level of absurdity and factor in real problems like hunger, poverty, instability in the home, disability, health problems, you name it, and you have a recipe for disaster.
“What seemed like a more humane system to someone is turning out to be nothing short of a nightmare. And now the tests are changing again in ELA and Math. Who knows what new issues may arise?
“How many students will be adversely affected? I don’t know. The ODE deals in percentages, I deal in human beings, the 140 plus sophomores I’m teaching. Like the one who told me, “I left half that math test blank. We hadn’t even learned that stuff yet.” Or the other kid who said, “There were some questions…I didn’t even know what they were asking.” These are good people, hard working kids that we’re simply grinding through this machine for some political rhetoric regarding career and college readiness….
“I have no interest in a punitive high stakes testing system. I am only interested in “Proficient and Above” percentages inasmuch as they impact the kids I teach. I am ashamed to be a part of the implementation of such a system, and I work every day to attempt to remediate its terrible impact. Like many of you, I am angry.”

Diane…..either you are traveling or haven’t had your first cup of coffee. Go over to The NYTimes and see what Opt Out has done to Cuomo. So thankful to Opt Out and all the parent groups that are making inroads. Wish I could say the same for Randi.
Happy Thanksgiving!!!!
LikeLike
And the power of people like Carol Burris who never gave up on the fight.
LikeLike
I haven’t seen the Times yet. Too busy blogging.
LikeLike
It’s great to read something from another history teacher, Diane, who like you tells it the way it is. This piece really hits home. The kids sure are confused by all the zany, build-it-as-you-fly it Common Core madness nationwide.
On his blog, this Ohio teacher writes, “When I startle myself awake at 3 in the morning, and stare into the darkness toward the ceiling, I’m not thinking of percentages or politics. I’m thinking about these kids in my class and what I can do to assure their success…” Absolutely.
I’d bet a lot of money that Arne Duncan and Andrew Cuomo and John B. King aren’t waking up at 3 in the morning and thinking about specific students with very complicated lives in an actual, real life classes -unless those kids are their own flesh and blood.
Add this teacher’s post to the avalanche of evidence that proves that it’s high time people in the United States stop attacking our public schools. Right now. Stop chewing up our own good people. There are plenty of very real threats and problems out there, that’s for sure.
As people get ready for Thanksgiving , Ohio Teacher, THANKS to you!
LikeLike
I just do not understand why decent grades in high school are not sufficient to graduate from high school. How many of these yahoos were required to “pass” high stakes tests when they were in high school? Where you suspect programming may be weak, FUND THE SCHOOLS!!! I seriously doubt that hoards of incompetent kids are being passed through high school especially in communities whose schools are adequately funded. In communities that carry a large burden of poverty, provide wrap around services and deliver these children to school in some condition to learn. Stop testing kids to death. Neither they nor their teachers are going to improve because you try to whip them across the finish line. The human being is built to learn. School should be a place that encourages that native ability.
LikeLike
Many of the legislators like Stivers admit to being poor students and jocks rather than academically motivated. Most of the legislature runs more like a drunken frat house of good old boys rather then a contemplative body. So what is Stiver’s latest important contribution to improving educational outcomes? Eliminate pay-to-play fees even if it means this unfunded state mandate cuts world languages or calculus teachers. Because he played football. First, the Party of Stupid and Crazy cuts schools to the bone, then it forces them to fund athletics over academics. Ohio is off the rails.
LikeLike
More data, rubric, weighted formula gone off the deep end. What’s next? You can only graduate if you outperform a hypothetical statistical model of yourself?
LikeLike
Thank you, Dr. Ravitch, for posting these concerns from Ohio. I’m the author of the post, and spent the better part of yesterday explaining individual scores and graduation scenarios to students. They’d just gotten scores in homeroom and had some concerns, “Should I retake that test?” “What if I took Algebra in 8th grade?” “Am I on track to graduate?” As I explained in the post, some questions are difficult to answer because the variables make nothing straightforward. The questions were worrisome, but not as troubling as the students who sat stone-faced, clearly unwilling to discuss scores that were terrifyingly low. Teaching kids in an urban district with very real outside problems makes the addition of these bureaucratic formalities especially frustrating, especially when we all know that the thing the tests measure best is a student’s socio-economic status.
LikeLike
Here in Ohio, legislators write laws they do not even understand. The latest mess on teacher evaluations, testing, and graduation is a good case study on the pitfalls of micromanagement by clueless leaders.
But there is hope in HB 212 that does away with state mandated teacher evaluation by useless VAM tests. Ohio moved away from PARCC and now may be coming to its senses on evaluations. It has been like watching a train wreck in slow motion as our Republican rulers fumbled around rather than listen. We teachers can only say “I told you so”.
LikeLike
We need hundreds more just like M. Jablonski! He’s a bright light in the dark.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
NYS plans to up the Regents Algebra Exam into a Common Core Regents. Currently, both exams are offered so students can take one or the other or both. (Advanced 8th graders also have to take the 8th Grade Common Core Math Assessment for a possible total of three final exams). Anyway, last year’s CC Algebra Regents was full of Advanced Algebra questions. Advanced Algebra is considered an 11th grade course vs Algebra which is usually for Freshmen. To make matters worse, students must pass this exam in order to graduate. Sometime in the future,the state plans to only offer the CC Exam. They are doing the same thing to the English Final.
In the leadership’s goal to break up the unions and get rid of pensions, how many children will be hurt? How many will flunk out of high school because they are not “career or college” ready? And if they aren’t at least career ready, how do the powers that be expect them to support themselves as adults? In addition, who will be left to fill those jobs which require some sort of expertise? Fired teachers?
Ohio seems to be headed for the same boat.
LikeLike
Diane, I’m sorry this teacher is having so much trouble with reading comprehension. At least for her, she doesn’t have to be read well to keep her job. Let me help her out:
Students can pass if they simply pass math (two tests), language arts (two tests), biology, American history, American gov’t,. Done.
Apparently the legislators felt bad so they gave them some fallbacks such as:
1. Fail 3 of the tests (only get a 2 instead of a passing 3) and still graduate
2. Pass a real college entrance test without having to go to the dummies (remediation) class
3. Decide to become a welder (and not a philosopher) a la Rubio’s advice and see the rewards of your work in the real world everyday
Diane, I’m always here to answer your questions or those of any reader so please don’t hesitate to avail yourselves of this valuable resource. I found that reading comprehension is a critical skill that many pre-common core adults simply never mastered.
Have a Happy Thanksgiving!!!!!!
LikeLike