Ken Bernstein, veteran teacher and NBCT, listened to the Democratic debate (his picture was kaput on his TV). He was disappointed by how little was said about education, a familiar reaction.
He writes:
“I was disappointed on how little there was on education. Yes, Bernie again mentioned free tuition at public colleges and universities. And Hillary talked about the school resource officer in SC (to which I will return beneath the fold), as well as the increasing percentage of students receiving Free and reduced Meals (for increasing numbers it is breakfast as well as lunch), but there was no discussion of what this administration has done that has distorted and damaged public education, and whether any of them would take a different approach….
Let me talk about an incident from my past. I will not identify the school, the grade level, when it occurred, or anything that might identify a student.
A student came up to me at the start of the day – I was the students’ homeroom teacher. The student said an uncle wanted me to call him. I checked quickly and the uncle was not listed as an adult contact for the student. It was clear the student, a very sweet kid, was very distressed. I explalned I could listen to the uncle but I could not discuss anything about the student to the uncle under Federal law. I asked if the student wanted to tell me what was going on, but the student was reluctant. I arranged for the student to talk first to someone in administration which led to the student talking to the counselor. Later that day the student was picked up from school by the uncle.
What had happened was in the overnight hours the local police had come into the home, pointed a gun at the mother in front of the student, and taken the mother out in handcuffs. The student had apparently called the uncle who was temporarily taking care of the student.
As I said, this was a very sweet student. Imagine a student who was not so sweet, imagine the stress, imagine what might have happened had an adult yelled at the student.
I think of another case of a student who came to school on a Monday very hungry, unable to concentrate. The student had not eaten since lunch at school on Friday.
I ask you how we could legitimate expect either of these students – and the many others with troubling situations – to focus on pure academics.
One reason I try to get to know my students (not always successfully) is so that I do not further damage a child/adolescent who is already in pain.
Think of 51% eligible for free and reduced meals. Understand that if school closes for bad weather, either that student or someone else in the household might not eat.
Think of the increasing numbers of students who live in shelters – no place to bring a friend over to one’s house.
One year at Eleanor Roosevelt I taught a very proud young man whose family had no fixed location, and sometimes had to sleep in their car. He would not come to school if he could not shower and at least wash his underwear. He was missing close to half of the school days, but could you blame him?
It goes further. We have students with little emotional control because of the circumstances in which they live. We have others who may suddenly act in unexpected and even explosive ways, perhaps because they can no longer keep bottled up all the hurt and pain and discrimination and hunger and poverty and violence with which they have to live.
Whoever our next President will be, I hope that s/he understand this, that what we are doing to our young people is sowing seeds of destruction for our nation.
I try to assure my students that in my classroom they will be safe – first physically, then emotionally, and also intellectually, the last so that I can challenge them and help them develop their thinking.
School has to be a welcoming place, because for too many of our young people it may be the one place of safety and comfort and even food upon which they can depend.
It is why our obsessing about test scores totally misses the point. It is why we should be focused on the whole child, which include the arts as a means of expression, and the very real need for some physical outlet, which could be traditional physical education, but could also be dance, or marching band. It is one reason I see a real need for teaching mindfulness, and perhaps things like yoga and meditation.
So I am as much of a radical in my own way as others may be politically.
What will our candidates do for our young people?
They need an economic future.
They need a world that is not destroyed by global climate change.
They need security from terrorism.
But they also need basic emotional security and support.
They need regular medical and dental care.
They need food security.
They need a safe place to live.
They need stability in their lives.
Otherwise we are not serving them.
That was my strongest takeaway from tonight’s forum, perhaps because I have spent the last two decades working with young people in school settings.

Too many people do not understand how important having a class that is a safe haven is. It doesn’t mean you ignore academics because, as a friend said, she demands a lot from her students because she wants for them what she has been able to provide for her own children. It just means that we never forget that they are young human beings who need understanding and respect from us as well, and maybe even a snack or two. Bernstein expresses these ideas so well.
LikeLike
It is schocking that the candidates did not speak about K – 12 education and directly about the privatization of public schools.
Today, Chris Hedges writes about TPP and how this treacherous legislation, finally available for all to read, will include a takeover of all public agencies including the Post Office and also public schools.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_most_brazen_corporate_power_grab_in_american_history_20151106/
In LA yesterday, we learned, as added insult to our freedom, that the search group soliciting for a new Superintendent for LAUSD, chose 43 candidates, and at least 8 are prominent, and very dangerous, charter school operators. These are the people i am informed about who should never have appeared on the list…most are Broad Academy people, and others are Wall Street oligarchs.
Caprice Young, Eric Holder, Thelma Melendez, Henry Cisneros, Marshall Tuck, Paul Vallas, Antonio Villaraigosa, Ted Mitchell, John King, MaryEllen Elia, Some of these are proven failures in past jobs, some are proven free marketeers, some are borderline dishonest, some have worked for the most questionable people, some have been fired for their behaviors, some are not educators, and the Broadies among them are openly pro charter, so why are they named for this top job?
At least 1 out of 4 choices of the 43 (many I just do not know) are such misfits to oversee the second largest public school district in the nation that it is almost laughable, but I have tears in my eyes. As you will see, some are prominent politicos and are Democrats. This search committee, chosen by Ramon Cortines and the BoE, is so inept that few showed up at the ‘rigged’ public meetings set up only for community anger release and phony input. And all of this once again is paid for by we impotent taxpayers.
We are once again ruled by the heavy and dictatorial hand of Eli Broad and his vulture investor partners.
LikeLike
Please read Chris Hedges at this link. He expands on the local, national, and worldwide domination that aims to use all of our democratic assets like public schooling, for autocratic wealth acquisition and under control of the few at the top. Think ALEC and TPP…and NAFTA, Gatt, WTO, etc.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_most_brazen_corporate_power_grab_in_
american_history_20151106/
LikeLike
Thank you for your honest and compassionate letter. I am amazed at what teachers see and experience everyday. Until our country values people and individuals whether they be the elderly students or the unborn we will continue to have a decline in the American lifestyle and the American Dream will no longer exist. We can not continue to turn a blinds eye to the social and emotional plight of so many in our community. The way you articulated your educational experience and my children’s experience, I applaud you. Now what can parents, community members and American citizens do to help? We need to have HOPE. Helping Others Protect Everyone. We are only as strong as our most vulnerable citizens. Thank you.
Diana.
LikeLike
I think Ken makes an important point: “They [the students] need stability in their lives.”
Teachers work to provide a reliable, safe space for students. It’s a space were students learn but it’s also place where they are cherished. They are respected for who they are -not treated like future cogs in some high tech machine. That safe place is our classrooms.
Meanwhile, outside our doorways there is this whole whirlwind, this well financed army of people hell-bent on disrupting whatever plans we happen to make on any given day. Some are well-meaning, some wrong-headed, too many are just plain power hungry and greedy.
It can range from the school administrator, who has never actually stood in front of a class of students but wants to nitpick your lesson, to Bill Gates, flying over the entire nation, carpet bombing the public with yet another one of his poop-loads.
Of course, I hate to say it but sometimes teachers can be their own worst enemies. So, someone comes up with a theory to “flip” your classroom and the next day you can see some educators falling all over themselves to “flip”. Today flip, tomorrow flop, next week, flap. It all changes as fast as you can say “rigrus”.
Yes, yes, I know that our students are living in an increasingly fast-paced world and they need to know how to adapt to rapid change. I can just hear that typical reformer’s nattering voice droning on about “change is good” and “I love change” and “Let me give you some change since you don’t have a job.” Blah, blah, blah.
But the reality is that all human beings need a basic level of safety and security. Psychology 101. Our children especially deserve that safe haven. And, boy, it sure is a fight these days to to provide our kids with that stability.
LikeLike
“Teachers work to provide a reliable, safe space for students. It’s a space were students learn but it’s also place where they are cherished. They are respected for who they are -not treated like future cogs in some high tech machine. That safe place is our classrooms.”
This is so true. And the vast majority of so-called “failing schools” do this, day in and day out, despite overwhelming odds against. Calling them “failing Schools” is worse than insulting.
LikeLike
“Yes, yes, I know that our students are living in an increasingly fast-paced world and they need to know how to adapt to rapid change.”
That’s been being said for the last half century at least. Ain’t nuthin new.
LikeLike
Duane, I think someone said that at the opening of the 20th century.
Actually: Adam said to Eve, “We are living in an age of transition.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
This thread pretty much encapsulated why I enjoy reading your blog, Diane. And it goes beyond “enjoy.” Thanks.
LikeLike
While it’s always been true, it’s more true now. Internet? Technology? Globalization? Transportation? Climate change? etc.
LikeLike
What we need is a public school teacher like Mercedes Schneider, who supports public education, knows the issues inside and out, and has a national reputation, to run for President. That is the only way that public education will be discussed in a serious way in the presidential primaries.
And before dismissing this idea out of hand, just look at the Republican candidates. A doctor and a businessman, each with no political experience, are leading the Republican primary. Why not a teacher?
LikeLike
Read this posting in conjunction with two from yesterday (11-6-2015): “Mike Petrilli and I Have a Brief Exchange about International Test Scores” and “Mercedes Schneider: Petrilli and Wright Make an Argument That is Full of Holes.”
From the end of the second posting, quoting Dr. Schneider:
[start]
In the closing of their article, Petrilli and Wright state that poverty cannot be used as an “excuse” to “explain away America’s lackluster academic performance.” They call it “a crutch unfounded in evidence”– as though their porous offering is solid evidence refuting the role of poverty upon standardized test scores.
Not so.
Too many holes.
[end]
From the POV of Petrilli and Wright, no matter the specific topic at hand, poverty is an excuse and a crutch for those advocating for a “better education for all.”
How convenient for the well fed, well cared for, and secure!
Too bad so many students and their families can’t “excuse away” that “crutch” and live the sort of secure life enjoyed by the “thought leaders” of corporate education reform and THEIR OWN CHILDREN.
Or perhaps, to use Mr. Petrilli’s own term, he’s just a “non-striver” lacking the “grit” and “rigor” necessary to recognize what public schools really do and have to grapple with.
He and his apparatchik in arms are so insistent on ignoring the many (yes, aspirational!)
goals and hopes of public education that they seem unable to self-correct and lift themselves out of the ranks of the “uneducables” [Rahm Emanuel].
And when challenged, what do we get from the rheephormsters? They’re being “swarmed” and “shrill” and “strident” critics impolitely point out that their rationales are shot full of holes and their motives are being questioned by ungrateful lesser beings who fail to understand that their station in life is to obey without question commands from on high. You’d think noblesse oblige was passé!
😱
Poor dears! Time to clutch pearls and fall on the fainting couch…
But not to worry too much. Their fall from grace so often is cushioned by the wads of $tudent $ucce$$ they and their employers and patrons have piled, and are piling, up.
Just ask John Deasy, with his $60,000 buh-bye gift from LAUSD and his ever-so-demanding gig at Broad’s academy.
Ah, for the shot callers and enablers and enforcers of the “new civil rights movement of our time” life is just so much easier than it was for the “old civil rights movement” where you could be murdered and viciously beaten and slandered by the MSM as communists and haters and anti-American.
And then there’s that Ravitch woman and her ilk coming along and spoiling their party…
Well, for all you party poopers out there that wonder when rheephorm’s “civil dialogue” is going to start:
“I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.”
Frederick Douglass.
Amen.
😎
LikeLike
Don’t forget, dear Krazy…that Deasy not only left with the $60K payoff, but his high priced BH Fraud lawyer specialist also got the BoE to sign off on ever prosecuting him. What a deal!
Let’s hope the FBI and the SEC can prosecute in Federal court if their investigations turn up bidding fraud and/or collusion as is suspected.
LikeLike
..and yes…I identify as part of the “Ravitch ilk.”
LikeLike
The candidates are shying away from public education because, no matter what side they take, they will alienate large groups of voters. On the charter school side, they will alienate big money. On the public school side, they will alienate parents and teachers. As always, the democrats are too “wishy washy” to take a stand. Education is a controversial issue they want to avoid. Who could have ever guess that supporting public schools would be a big controversy?
LikeLike
But, are you ever going to get the level of specificity you desire from national candidates? I bet all three would “agree” with what he wrote- I bet the current administration would “agree” too.
Of the three Democrats, I think you’re most likely to be able to “vet” Martin O’Malley because he has an actual record of running public schools at the state level. He made a claim that could be verified and narrowed- he said Maryland public schools got better under his watch. That’s a concrete statement on a set of public schools. I don’t know if it’s true but I’m sure he has loads of programs and statements about public schools in Maryland one could look at and have some idea what he might do at the federal level. With the other two we’re just reading tea leaves. Neither of them has an actual record “on public schools” other than perhaps infrequent Senate votes on huge federal legislation. The current Congress didn’t even bother to re-authorize the law that impacts public schools and they had years to do so, so schools couldn’t have been a high priority.
LikeLike
At least the 3 Dems comported themselves as knowledgeable and valid candidates and each put forth substantive talking points on issues, not insults and vapid comments like the Repubs. However, Hillary is a close friend and associate of Eli Broad and was his lawyer at one point, and as Eli states publicly, “she comes when he calls.” She solicits donations from the worst sort of oligarchs and PACs. Bernie, whom I support, is a dark horse both about education and about guns, which alarms me O’Malley did well each time he has spoken, and is impressive and has a track record, but as Rachel Maddow reinforced repeatedly, he only commands about 2% of the polled voters.
LikeLike
“However, Hillary is a close friend and associate of Eli Broad and was his lawyer at one point, and as Eli states publicly, “she comes when he calls.”
That’s exactly what she has done, and will do, with all her corporate sponsors.
“Bernie, whom I support, is a dark horse both about education and about guns”
I don’t know if you’re using that term correctly. But his gun platform is clearly defined, and it is a moderate position. He has said no less on education than any other politician, though if you read between the lines (and heard some things he’s said) it is clear he is against privatization, vouchers, and the rampant testing in K-12. Unlike many other politicians, what he says is not empty rhetoric, but his true belief.
“O’Malley did well each time he has spoken, and is impressive and has a track record, but as Rachel Maddow reinforced repeatedly, he only commands about 2% of the polled voters.”
There are a lot more problems with O’Malley than “he only commands 2% of the voters.” He is a good speaker but speaks like a politician. He dodged Maddow’s questions almost as much as Hillary. He is also hated pretty widely in his home state for some of the things he’s done as governor. https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/24rpqs/i_am_martin_omalley_governor_of_maryland_ask_me/
LikeLike
Thanks Ed…did not know that O’Malley was so disliked by so many in Maryland. But since he is too much of a longshot to even be considered, he is out of my purview. I worry that Bernie will turn over his loyal, hard working supporters to Hillary at some point.
We who are educators certainly can identify with Ken Bernstein who is a prime truth teller about poverty, children, and the current education process.
LikeLike
Maryland has suffered greatly under reform leadership and policy championed under O’Malley. He is a disaster. Maryland is truly a Mecca toward which all reformers bow each day. He had much to do with that!
LikeLike
Yes, all that and more. Buffalo even has a policy to deal with students who are homeless, which is a growing problem that I’m sure is not unique to this city.
How does that fit into CC?
LikeLike
I agree with Mr. Bernstein that the candidates had ample opportunity to discuss education at the forum, unlike the debate where there were scripted questions and time to rebut what others stated. I was concerned particularly that Bernie Sanders did not. However, which candidate seems most likely to work on the issues that Ken listed at the end as necessary for kids to be prepared to do well in school, such as healthcare, food security, and the rest? Bernie Sanders.
LikeLike
This entire post was about students not having social and economic security. While Hillary and OMalley give lipservice and may have done little things to help here and there, Bernie’s whole platform is framed around social and economic justice, and he’s been fighting for the same thing for decades. I am skeptical that the people who write letters like this in a panic know much about the candidates. Disappointing. You have to actually look into the candidates to see the big picture. Come on, teachers.
LikeLike
I too agree, in spades, all that Mr. Bernstein said and would emphasize that about which you said about all the things stated at the end. THESE have a profound affect on the education of our children and must not be overlooked. Yes we would all like more attention to the kinds of things so often mentioned in these blogs but I have stated more than once that as educators, not just teachers or instructors we absolutely MUST look at candidates in their entirety. I have NEVER met anyone with whom I agreed on everything in which they believed.
LikeLike
I wish there was more focus on the huge Obama Administration push to sell “digital learning” to public schools. They’re teaming up with tech companies to do this and it just feels like another giant, planned, ed reform marketing campaign. Everyone from Amazon to Microsoft to Apple to Duncan’s army of salespeople are parroting the same line.
I sincerely hope people at the local level resist the slick sales job and make smart, informed decisions on budget priorities and actual benefits to public school students, even if our gullible, fad-loving and easily-led state lawmakers swallow this stuff whole.
There is no reason to buy what they’re selling. It’s not required. Public schools can say “thanks but no thanks, we’ll take our time with this and use our own judgment”.
In fact, given the track record of the Obama Administration and public schools, the assumption should be the information is NOT reliable and is instead driven by an agenda. Why the hard sell on digital learning from this administration? Why the big push to “buy today!, limited time offer!” I sincerely hope public schools don’t fall for it.
http://tech.ed.gov/futureready/
LikeLike
A few remarks
. Diane is correct that I am an NBCT, but as of the end of this month that will no longer be true, and I no longer include that designation on my CV. I am now 69. I benefited greatly from going through the process, which required me to think how what I did benefited the students in my care, and how I contributed to the profession. Certification is for ten years, and mine will shortly expire. I chose not to renew because of my advancing age, and not knowing how much longer I would remain in the classroom (I did try to retire in 2012).
I was actually surprised to see that Diane chose to feature this piece. I always send her links when I write on topics I think might interest her.
As a response to several comments above, as long as I am here.
1. Maryland under O’Malley was fully committed to NCLB, RttT, and PARCC testing. In fact, his state department of education rejected the efforts of several school districts to design methods of tying teacher evaluation to student assessment that were not so destructively based on standardized tests. Montgomery County, the state’s largest district, had an established program which was rejected. Prince George’s County, the 2nd largest, tried to use things like evaluation of performing arts groups. I know because as a teacher i was part of the task force in PG that designed the plan. Ours was also rejected. The state legislature had thought that no more than 35% of the teacher’s evaluation should be connected to student assessment. O’Malley and the state superintendent he had inherited made their proposal to the federal government at 50%. Knowing one of the key state legislators on an education committee, I know the legislature was not all that happy at seeing that.
2. Both Sanders and Clinton have track records on education. Some of it is mixed for both. I will not revisit everything. I remember that back during the 2008 primary season Clinton was the only candidate who addressed the real unfunded mandate in public education, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which had promised that the Feds would pick up 40% of the average additional cost imposed by the act. Congress never came close to that, peaking out at 19% in FY2005, with an average federal commitment through legislation at 15% or less. The only time we approximately funded at or near the 40% level was during the two years under the stimulus (American Reinvestment and Recovery Act), where the particulars of educational funding were not subjected to congressional vetting. That was positive, Race to the Top was not.
3. My posting at Daily Kos was not intended in any way to be an endorsement of any candidate. I wanted to address an issue that was touched on during the forum, and to explain its importance. At this point I do not view any of the candidates as more likely to address what matter to me in education. I want to hear/see much more about education and subjects related. While I value what Sanders has said on higher education, my concern is far more focused on K-12 because that is where I have spent the last two decades. I hope that future Democratic events, whether in a forum or a debate, will delve much more into the issues of education, so that I can see who has the best understanding.
LikeLike
Thanks so much for the info on O’Malley. The VAM promotion is a huge red flag for me. That should have been questioned before school districts spent hundreds of millions of dollars on it.
I read that Duncan fell in love with VAM based on one paper- The Widget Effect. If O’Malley also swallowed it whole that’s almost disqualifying.
LikeLike
I’m also a (former) Marylander, and I am also unimpressed by O’Malley.
LikeLike
Ken..thanks so much for these clarifications. Very helpful to learn about the real O’Malley track record. And as so often, I agree with your view of it all.
LikeLike
Sorry to be harsh on this post but someone has to say it. Anyone who doesn’t clearly see that Sanders is the best ally of teachers and students, is not looking closely enough. Please don’t wait for him to call out Bill Gates on ed reform. It’s not going to happen, at least not now. Choose the candidate who will bring the most economic and social justice, and we can go from there.
LikeLike
Thanks, Ed Detective. Agree. Bernie and the other candidates are worlds apart when it comes to their track record of caring about human lives.
LikeLike
These teachers threatening to drop Bernie’s support and spreading doubt about his character are not doing themselves or their students any favors. His campaign is running on positive energy, and this momentum is the only way he will win the primary. Cut that energy down and he won’t even make it past the primary, leaving us once again to choose between the lesser of major evils. How can we get teachers to understand that the time to press Bernie into more detail on #K12edpolicy is AFTER THE PRIMARIES…
LikeLike
“…there was no discussion of what this administration has done that has distorted and damaged public education, and whether any of them would take a different approach…”
I doubt the “culture bearers” will ever discuss WHY the “instruments” of democracy
are also the “instruments” of ANTI-democracy. A discussion of such, might “ping”
the perpetually rejuvenated illusion…
LikeLike
I was deeply moved by this piece. We are hurting children with test-and-no-excuses-punishment. I wish helping children instead of testing and ranking them were part of the Election 2016 conversation. It wasn’t entirely absent, last night, though. There was a question very much about education (about Bill and Melinda Gates, about Mark Zuckerberg…), about Big Data, that may have been overlooked.
Rachel Maddow: “I am freaked out by the political influence that the tech industry has, particularly in the Democratic Party because the Democratic Party is the more liberal of the two parties. And I feel like if they’re going to be captured by this hugely rich and powerful tech industry, I don’t know who will ever stand up to them. And there is a big, revolving door in the tech industry and the highest flyers in the Democratic Party: David Plouffe to Uber, Jay Carnie to Amazon, Chris Lehane to Airbnb. You [Hillary] have speaking fees from companies like eBay and QUALCOMM and salesforce.com, and I’m not saying any of these companies is a bad thing, but the tech industry now rivals Wall Street in money and influence. What is the protection that the American people have that those industries aren’t just going to keep getting what they want, even when it hurts the rest of us, especially if the Democrats are so in bed with them?”
LikeLike
Yes, Left Coaster…and Hillary thanked Rachel for bringing into the conversation our Left Coast power players. When you see how much of Venice Beach area that Google has gobbled up, it becomes even more clear how tech rules in California, and in the nation. I never considered that tech has become a counter balance to DC…but considering the Vergara case (to kill due process and the entire union movement) was instituted by David Walsh of Silicon Valley fame, in partnership with Eli Broad, and expanding on how these two billionaires are now pushing this case to become the law nationwide, it is clearly correct. Tech giants wield too much power in the public arena…and that includes many more than just Bill Gates.
LikeLike
They have too much influence over every political party in every city. They have too much influence over the Raichur Municipal Council in India. From a link in an article in seattletimes.com about Gates’ pay per poop tech toilets:
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/raichur-city-fails-to-wake-up-to-etoilets/article4764796.ece
LikeLike
Education was taken off the table by Randi and Lily months ago when they railroaded through premature, unveiled endorsements of Hillary. The two teacher union presidents did the dirty work for the Dems who want k-12 off the table. No candidate could do it by herself/himself without paying a price, so it was up to the two Democratic agents heading up the two teacher unions to free Hillary from having to address the destruction of public schools by her own sponsors–the billionaires of Wall St and Goldman Sachs, the looting of public school district budgets by tech companies and commercial vendors of standardized testing who are deeply embedded in the Democratic Party, and the Democratic Party not allowing any criticism of Pres. Obama b/c he is a sitting Dem. Pres., and b/c black folks are wedded to this Pres., and black folks are the most reliable voting bloc in the Dem. coalition. Hillary and Bernie both obey these restrictions–no k-12 policy deiscussion, no critique of high-tech and standardized looting of public schools, no criticism of Obama’s disastrous education program for public education and Obama’s replenishing the lost billions to his and Hillary’s backers on Wall St. Both O and H are underwritten by billionaires to whom they must answer first and finally. When running for office, they have to promise voters relief and better times for as long as it takes to get them to vote Democratic. Obama’s abandonment of his own “progressive” posing in the 08 campaign is being repeated now in Hillary’s campaign.
LikeLike
Brilliant analysis, Ira…right on.
LikeLike
Thank you, Ira. As an NEA member, I was outraged by Lily Eskelson Garcia’s endorsement of Hillary “Charter School” Clinton.
Bernie Sanders is the only candidate who speaks for the non-millionaires in this country. He is the only candidate who has integrity. I hope that he will pay attention to what is being done to the public schools across the country, in the name of “reform” (profit), and listen to the voices of those who speak for the kids we teach.
LikeLike
I agree.
LikeLike
Take one for the team and hire King – you’ll be saving the nation. Or take Evilia and rescue NYS.
Actually, I wouldn’t wish either of these candidates on my worst enemy.
Good luck – it looks like you are going to need an act of God to fix the mess in LA.
LikeLike
Hi Teacher Ken:
I greatly admire your dedication and your love to the young unfortunates under your care.
I sincerely ask you that if Bernie Sanders has not feared to advocate for racial and economic equality in his youth, then would he fear for his life at this 70+ year old in order to fight back those big bad wolves in tech giant or Wall Street?
I would heartily endorse Bernie Sanders after I read your thread and all of its comments in Daily Kos link.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/11/07/1446223/-So-I-listened-to-the-candidates-forum
Hopefully, if it is possible, Democrat team of President and Vice President is Bernie for President and Hillary for Vice President. As a result, Hillary does not need to worry about the conflict of interest to the Wall Street, as well as voters have Bernie who will fight for justice fearlessly. May God bless America to have a true warrior for justice in racial and economic equality, and mostly for the best Public Education from K-12 to higher education. Back2basic.
LikeLike