Bill Bush and Catherine Candisky of the Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch raise important questions about whether Ohio Department of Education officials lied when preparing the state’s application for federal charter funds. For most of the previous years, the press across the state had been filled with stories about the charters’ poor performance, about financial scandals, about abrupt charter school closings, about the absence of transparency or accountability or oversight in this $1 billion sector. That $1 billion was siphoned away from public schools, and in far too many cases, went into the pocket of wealthy campaign contributors to the GOP.
Both federal and state officials failed in their duty to monitor the use of federal funds and to tell the truth. The federal government should have known, and the Ohio officials should have been honest. But the scandal-scarred charter sector of Ohio won the largest federal grant for charter schools: $71 million.
In applying for a federal grant, the Ohio Department of Education said it would close “ poor-performing” charter schools, touted an automatic-closure law that shuts them down, and promised that only the best-rated charter sponsors would create new schools.
But it also said that, in the 2012-13 school year, Ohio had no “poor-performing” charters, even though about a third of charters didn’t meet a single standard on their state report cards that year and 60 percent of them got D or F grades on the Performance Index, a measure of how students perform on state tests.
The grant application also failed to mention that the automatic-closure law is currently suspended and won’t return until at least the 2017-18 school year.
And those “best-rated” sponsors? Two days after filing the application, the man responsible for drafting it, David Hansen, resigned for having scrubbed data to make sponsors rate higher. All his sponsor ratings were subsequently rescinded. The grant application said that only sponsors “rated ‘ exemplary’ or ‘effective’ under the state’s quality evaluation criteria will be invited to participate.”
Troubling facts like these continue to place a cloud over Ohio’s successful bid for the $71 million, five-year federal grant. The Ohio Department of Education wants an aggressive expansion of charter schools across the state.
“The goal is for high-quality schools,” said Kim Norris, agency spokeswoman. “It will be a highly competitive process with schools applying for the grant dollars.”
The state will funnel almost all of the money to entities hoping to start new charters — including new for-profit online charters, which now rank as some of Ohio’s worst-performing schools.

“The state will funnel almost all of the money to entities hoping to start new charters — including new for-profit online charters, which now rank as some of Ohio’s worst-performing schools.”
I cannot believe Obama and Kasich are expanding these “cybercharters”. Incredible.
Also, how credible is the USDOE on charters generally if they award grants based on incomplete or false submissions? Do they know anything about the situation in the states? They’re running around the country promoting these schools based on what? Schools in NY or Boston? How is that at all relevant to the situation in Ohio, where there is little or no charter regulation?
LikeLike
Also, I hate to be a “traditionalist” but doesn’t Congress allocate these funds in our scheme of government? Do they have some duty to provide oversight?
There was supposedly a “scathing” report on Duncan’s charter school grant process in 2012. Have any of them looked at it?
With as much money as states have cut from public schools under ed reform leadership at the federal and state level since 2009, one would think they’d be watching every penny.
LikeLike
Did Ohio officials lie? Probably.
Did the Obama administration knowingly ignore the obvious? Well, they are either impossibly moronic or corruptible toe suckers.
The whole thing reeks of corruption and incompetence from top to bottom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What caught my eye from the posting:
[start]
In applying for a federal grant, the Ohio Department of Education said it would close “poor-performing” charter schools, touted an automatic-closure law that shuts them down, and promised that only the best-rated charter sponsors would create new schools.
But it also said that, in the 2012-13 school year, Ohio had no “poor-performing” charters, even though about a third of charters didn’t meet a single standard on their state report cards that year and 60 percent of them got D or F grades on the Performance Index, a measure of how students perform on state tests.
[finish]
I await further explanation from the pro-charter/pro-testing folks that visit this blog.
😎
LikeLike
Unfortunately, OH is a political Wonderland straight out of ” Alice in Wonderland” where up is down and contributors to Republicans never have to say they’re sorry. Having lived, taught and retired here I keep wondering when the electorate will wake up and smell the coffee about Republicans, but I must say, the Democrats have mostly fiddled while Rome burns. We have a very effective Republican party apparatus that gets most of the money, controls redistricting and uses the politics of resentment to it’s advantage.
I’m noticing some cracks in their charter school propaganda though and can only hope people here wise up.
LikeLike
What’s really interesting in Ohio is how the two sectors are treated differently.
Here’s what happened when public schools scrubbed attendance data:
“In late June 2012, Ohio Auditor of State Dave Yost began investigating whether staff at school districts across Ohio improperly changed student data to make their schools’ performance look better, particularly on state report cards. The auditor’s office is also looking at what role the Ohio Department of Education played in any improper data maniupation.
In October 2012, the FBI launched its own investigation.
As of Oct. 23, Yost had found evidence of “scrubbing” in five districts: Campbell (near Youngstown), Cleveland, Columbus, Marion City and Toledo. The Ohio Department of Education also found that the Lockland district near Cincinnati had engaged in scrubbing.”
There were trials and convictions.
Why are ed reform leaders in the federal and state government so tough on public schools yet they repeatedly give a complete pass to charter schools?
LikeLike
US Government Accountability Office-
Investigative arm of Congress charged with examining matters relating to the receipt and payment of public funds.
We’ll see if they do anything.
LikeLike
Meanwhile, back in the disfavored “public sector schools” that educate 93% of the state’s children, ed reform leadership continues to cut funding:
“Back in July, Ohio Governor John Kasich signed a last minute legislation that will take millions of dollars away from several public schools in the 2016-2017 school year.
The bill could take away more than $4.5 million alone from just the ten districts in Northwest Ohio, such as Bowling Green, Anthony Wayne, Maumee, and Port Clinton.
School districts say they’d have to start looking at plans to lay off and cut back, but they’re not lying down just yet.”
I guess the plan is to so weaken the public schools they’ll have an excuse to open up more charters. Some of these public schools are actually quite good, and serve a diverse group of children, so I hope the public school parents start to wonder why none of the taxes they send to Columbus ever wind their way back to their local schools but are instead swallowed up without a trace into the black hole of “ed reform”.
LikeLike
This is why this and other independent blogs are so important. With a gag order on mainstream media, it is difficult to disseminate any information on shady dealings such as these and ask reasonable, legitimate questions about government. Otherwise, we stumble around in the dark while the oligarchs steal democracy.
LikeLike
ED currently (2015) administers a budget of $67.1 billion in discretionary appropriations.
The budget request for 2016 is $70.7 billion in discretionary appropriations for the Education Department, a 5.4 percent increase over the previous year’s funding.
Discretionary spending means that Arne has the power and authority to control that much money (if Congress gives the OK), and his discretionary budget has been the largest ever for USDE.
The Department of Education has the smallest staff of the 15 Cabinet agencies, but its discretionary budget alone is the third largest, behind only the Department of Defense and the Department of Health and Human Services.
Most of the Department’s 100-plus programs are funded through discretionary appropriation acts enacted each fiscal year. However, there are many education programs—some of them large—that are funded directly through their authorizing statutes. For many budgeting purposes, these programs are classified as mandatory. Congress wrangles the budget for discretionary spending through a process that is unlikely to lead to a close inspection of the rationales for line items.
See more at crfb.org/document/appropriations-101
LikeLike
Are racketeering charges limited to employees at the bottom of the food chain (Atlanta teachers)?
Chicago, L.A. the states of Ohio and Florida…. $2 bil. spent by oligarchs for Common Core. Corporate deals to profit from Common Core…. yet, no interest in Wash. D.C., for Congressional hearings?
Benghazi, half a world away, devastating to a very few people who were serving in a volatile country. ..yet, publicity and hearings out the kazoo.
America weeps.
LikeLike