This sounds hopeful. California has established a new agency to help and monitor struggling schools, and it will be led by a veteran educator, Carl Cohn.
I know Carl Cohn. He is the paradigm, the exemplar of a sensible and wise leader. He opposes punitive measures. He understands that what matters most is capacity-building and that requires collaboration and trust.
Here is a snippet from the interview linked above:
Cohn says:
“I think this is a dramatic departure from the past. Most of those other efforts were driven by state capitols and the federal government, but this is a major departure. The reason that I’m involved is that it is an opportunity to prove that the state of California has it right to emphasize teaching and learning and support for schools as opposed to embarrassing and punishing and shaming, which is what some have been all about since No Child Left Behind.
“This isn’t a new version of previous CDE [California Department of Education] efforts at intervention. It’s a completely new philosophy and execution independent of the state bureaucracy. It’s designed to listen to people in the field and to bring them together around improvement. It also draws heavily on the principle of subsidiarity where those at the local level actually know better how to rescue kids that we care about. So, I see this as a fundamental departure from what we’ve done in the past.
“Question: How does that look different on the ground? I’ve got the 30,000 foot view.
“Sure, I think as opposed to a lot of dictates and mandates coming from Sacramento, we start with the idea of collaboration, which is very different from what we’ve seen in the past. We start with best practice that is developed and honed at the local level. The idea is a powerful one in that you actually spend time in these places that have been labeled as failing, and you build their capacity.
“In the past, it was a lot of one-off luminaries coming in and regaling people with their skill set, how to reach poor kids, how to reach ELs. In stark contrast, this is about embedding people in schools so that once you leave after an extensive period of time, the locals have the capacity to better serve kids who are poor, kids who are in foster care, kids who are learning English, kids who have special needs. Very different on the ground than what we have seen in the past.”

This is great news. Now if only other states wake up and start looking at healthy ways to create educational excellence.
John
John Inman Ed.D., M.A., Ed.M., DDPE Creating educational solutions where learners develop individual gifts and realize their potential Seattle, WA john@learningexceptionalities.com http://www.learningexceptionalities.com 425-954-7256
Sign up for my updates and newsletters
LikeLike
How beautiful it is to read some common sense.
The current ‘education reform’ movement gets really draining because it is so harmful and destructive to all who are involved in education today.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
We can only hope that this is true. Collaboration in California’s public schools instead of rank, fire, close and punish.
LikeLike
California might be the last progressive state left but what happens when Brown is gone and the billionaires outspend everyone else in supporting their puppet candidates to stuff the state legislature with their clones and move their own slave into the governor’s mansion in Sacramento? The oligarchs have proven for decades that they will not give up and are willing to spend hundreds of millions annually to take over every sector of government from school board, city governments, states and Washington DC.
The resistance must not take for granted that this is a sign that the tide has turned against the Bill Gates, Walton, Broad and Koch cartels
LikeLike
Agree completely, Lloyd. When Jerry Brown is gone, what next? We have the charter-lover/former Mayor of LA, Villaraigosa running to be the next Gov, and it is rumored the billionaire charter supporter who just got fired as CEO/Publisher of the LA Times, Beutner, also is considering running…and they both are Dems. Who will the Repubs choose? Surely a staunch privatizer.
It is not time to cheer that things will turn around in California…the fight is just beginning…and at least today, hundreds of LAUSD teachers marched in the terrible heat, over 100 degrees, to protest Eli Broad and his edicts against teachers and public schools.
I have already gotten some angry phone calls from self defeating teachers who hate the union, and cannot see past their own problems in order to join with whatever allies they have to battle the real enemies of public ed, Wall Street and the billionaire investor/profiteers.
As a mediator, I always believe in joining forces with strange bedfellows on common issues, and not pulling your nose to spite your face. In this instance, I applaud Alex and all the brave teachers who are marching/
LikeLike
How about feeding some Fountain of Youth Elixir into Jerry Brown’s tea?
LikeLike
We could give him stem cell injections but California has term limits. Eventually Brown will be termed out.
California Proposition 28, the California Change in Term Limits Initiative, was on the June 5, 2012 ballot in California as an initiated constitutional amendment, where it was approved.
Proposition 28’s provisions are as follows:
It reduces the total number of years a politician can serve in the California State Legislature from 14 years to 12 years.
It permits a legislator to serve these 12 years in either the California State Senate or the California State Assembly. This change increases the number of years that a legislator can serve in either of those chambers.
Proposition 28 increases the number of years a legislator can remain in the California State Assembly from 6 years to 12 years. It increases the number of years a legislator can remain in the California State Senate from 8 years to 12 years.
The changes do not apply to any legislator who was already in office at the time that the initiative was approved; the rules governing the terms of those who are in the California State Legislature as of June 5, 2012 will be calculated under the previous rules.
California voters first imposed term limits on the California Legislature in 1990, when they voted in favor of Proposition 140.
The Governor of California is an elected constitutional officer, the head of the executive branch and the highest state office in California. The governor is popularly elected every four years by a plurality and is limited to two terms—Brown is in his second term. His term as governor back in 1974 – 1982 doesn’t count for the term limits that applied after his 2011 term started. In less than four years Brown will be termed out. He said he might run for another term as mayor of Oakland after he’s out of the governor’s mansion.
LikeLike
I could see Gavin Newsom or Kamela Harris also as potential gubernatorial candidates. I have no idea where they stand on education.
LikeLike
Yes, Diane…but he seems to be running on all cylinders (with no known elixers), and with his very intelligent wife, our Jesuit Gov would have been an excellent candidate for Prez…even one more time.
LikeLike
Newsom, not nearly as appealing a candidate, is running for Gov.
And Kamala Harris is running for State Senator for the seat which Barbara Boxer has held for over two decades. She should be a great candidate to support the progressive agenda which Boxer, IMO, has so wonderfully upheld in her long term of office.
Feinstein…not so much. But then she and husband are billionaires and never have to see Skid Row.
LikeLike
Ellen, start working on Gavin Newsom, and explain what a progressive agenda looks like.
LikeLike
And how about slipping some history into the tea of the voters! Villaraigosa and Beutner both left their offices in semi disgrace. Tony was broke and begging Eli for a job. Austin tried to sell a huge part of his company to Eli, and was fired by the company. Not good for campaigning, Eli! It’s not time to relax, but it is time to show appreciation for the good that still exists.
LikeLike
Also, Ellen, I applaud your ability to help teachers who feel betrayed or worthless, and angry. I bet I know some of them. They do not inspire me. You and Diane do.
LikeLike
Diane…I have tried in the past to educate Newsom on our issues, but will keep at it. Your vast public respect would certainly gain his attention. Do give him your input…actually please give your input to all our candidates.
However, Newsom is so self involved with his looks (see his eternal greasy hairdo), his social status (and woman problems), and other non essentials, I doubt that he can sell himself to our jaded California voters to be the next Gov. No one has yet emerged whom I would vote for…and that seems to be the mindset of my progressive friends and colleagues.
The major upset that might emerge is the underinformed Latino community who could once again be bribed by their leadership (as it was with Rodriguez for BoE), to vote for the Latino surnamed, failed Mayor Villaraigosa…who is really a ‘wanna be’ plutocrat, but does not have the smarts. He is a prime ‘toady’ of Broad. There are a huge number of Latino legislators in the California State House who will be working hard to get him elected. We have had many Speakers of the House, and our current leader of the State Senate, who are Latino/Chicano…so Ca. does often vote for legislators of color.
We also have a really second rate Congresswoman with very questionable judgement, Loretta Sanchez, running against the highly intelligent Kamala Harris, both Dems, for Boxer’s seat.
This new development of using bribery to get the Latino community to the polls, used in our last local school board election, and signing up the 18 years olds on HS campuses to vote ny promising them cash for their votes, it the worst thing I have seen in my scores of years in public policy and as a California lifetime resident who leans Left. The many wonderful Latino citizens, educators and others, I have worked with for decades are dismayed at this new turn of events.
LikeLike
Ellen, who else is running for governor in CA? I will be visiting this fall and will try to meet with him/her.
LikeLike
The oligarchs are doing a great job of divide and conquer when they turned the teachers’ unions against their own members. This just didn’t happen by accident. Eli Broad paid someone to make it happen—-his puppets found the price of the union’s leadership. Teachers who turn against the union must be ignorant of the fact that if the union isn’t doing what the majority of the membership wants, that leadership can be turned out in the next election as long as there is a choice that offers a change but I don’t think we even have that option anymore. It seems like no matter who the people vote for, they are voting for another tool that the oligarch already controls. I think the system is rigged.
LikeLike
http://citywatchla.com/8box-left/6666-lausd-and-utla-complicity-kills-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-la-s-teachers
Lenny Isenberg wrote this, which says a great deal about teachers and their unions… I discovered in nYC< how my union let it all happen!
"MY TURN-If you are a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) you have no civil rights and no union rights. LAUSD may target you for removal, because you either refuse to go along with the longstanding and highly profitable financial scam they have been running for generations now called public education, aka minority daycare.
"It is being played against predominantly students of color in a school district that Whites abandoned long ago (only 6% left in LAUSD), making it more segregated that it was prior to Brown vs. Board of Education in 1954. Or if you are just "guilty" of having a great deal of seniority, which puts you high on the salary scale, you can be removed from teaching with no collective bargaining rights and especially no arbitration as guaranteed by the LAUSD/UTLA Collective Bargaining Agreement, which is now systematically ignored, even if UTLA voted for it.
"By merely adding a gratuitous morals charge under California Education Code (44939.odt), a teacher can even be stripped of their Collective Bargaining rights to grievance and arbitration. This war against teachers started in 2006 when present chief LAUSD attorney David Holmquist was director of the LAUSD Office of Risk Management and Insurance Services. With 2006 Retiree Health Actuarial info.pdf, it became open season on older high-seniority and better paid teachers who either suffer from good teaching or honesty in the face of endemic LAUSD/UTLA corruption.
"In the case of thousands of media-made-invisible LAUSD teachers who have been removed from their livelihood without honest cause, they are put through a series of pro forma meetings, where the results are predetermined and those representing LAUSD will admit that they have never even read the responses to the knowingly false charges being brought against you, since LAUSD's sole motives are to get rid of teachers at the top of the salary, about to vest in lifetime health, or who are disabled.
"Furthermore, there will have been no investigation- other than talking to the principal who was encouraged by their superiors at LAUSD to bring the charges against you in the first place. The truth of charges is really never at issue, since your responses are never read and the finds of your "due process hearing" is written prior to the hearing.
After an ersatz Skelly hearing that in no way respects the rights that the Skelly case is supposed to insure, your name is submitted to the LAUSD Board for termination as a teacher without any proof being offered of the bogus and self-contradictory "evidence" being offered against you or even a minimal according of fundamental notions of due process of law.
"While this might seem to be a pretty extreme statement, I think Richard J. Schwab, esq. of Trygstad, Schwab, and Trygstad put it best when I first met him on November 17, 2010 on the occasion of my own dismissal proceedings that had just been rubber stamped by the LAUSD Board. At that time he said,
"You have no civil rights, you're chattel to LAUSD."
"Attorney Schab, a partner in Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad, seems to have an exclusive license to see to it that you are removed from employment at LAUSD in a manner that will be least strenuous and costly for LAUSD, while making their law firm a fortune as the only law firm that teachers union UTLA will pay any money to for your defense in a process where Schwab and Co. start out by assuming you are guilty of all the outrageous fabrications that LAUSD has made up against you.
"An attorney, after all, can make a great deal more money coercing you to cop a plea to something that you didn't do, rather than having to get themselves involved with the tedious business of actually advocating on your behalf. That and falsely telling teachers that their CALSTRS retirement, benefits, and unemployment are at jeopardy, when they are not, get most terrified teachers to roll over and resign or retire.
And aggregating all of the bogus cases against all teachers falsely accused or sitting in rubber rooms around the district or on unpaid leave into one claim against LAUSD or seeking equitable relief in the form of an injunction, according to Richard Schwab, "Would be a separate action," which he and his law firm will not engage in on your behalf with the money supplied by UTLA, unless of course you give him a sizable separate retainer.
"It doesn't take a Rhodes scholar to figure out that getting as many innocent teachers to cop a plea is far better for his law firm's bottom line than actually having to litigation on their behalf. "
"If you point out to either UTLA or Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad that they have a potential conflict of interest and that targeted teachers should be allowed to take any money that UTLA rarely and begrudgingly gives for your legal defense to another attorney, UTLA and Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad will deny this vehemently and UTLA will tell you that they will not give the money to any other attorney.
"Ironically, this unwillingness to allow a dues-paying UTLA union member under siege by LAUSD to pick their own defense attorney is probably the best proof of the conflict of interest, since UTLA as of this writing has been unable to state what interest they have in determining who advocates on your behalf- something Richard J. Schwab esq. also seems loathe to do.
"Present AFT President Joshua Pechthalt wrote me, when he still worked for UTLA, an email on November 3, 2010: "Leonard, the legal services committee will take this up and get back to you asap Josh." I'm still waiting for Joshua Pechthalt or anybody else from UTLA to get back to me.
"It is worth mentioning that because of this blog, I am contacted on a weekly basis by teachers who are being subjected to removal from LAUSD who have also been told by Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad that they have no case and should settle.
Proposed Rule 1.7 of the American Bar Association dealing with conflicts of interest clearly states that the client's consent must be obtained prior to representation and, in addition, where the fees of the client are paid for by a party other than the client, the client must sign a waiver.
"Attorney Schwab had no signed agreement for my representation and no signed waiver, but that did not stopped him from continuing to sell me out to LAUSD until last Friday, June 17, 2011, when I received a letter from him stating that he was withdrawing as my attorney.
"I guess he was finally able to consume the $15,000 that UTLA had given for my "defense." But that will have to be the subject of future posts on this subject."
"Schwab associate attorney Deborah Esaghian, back in 2011, made the most telling remark about where Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad stand in terms of defending teachers, "I would never send my children to an LAUSD school."
"So why would a union like UTLA have attorneys who clearly care so little about public education and the teachers doing the thankless job of trying to teach with no support and hostility from LAUSD administrators, UTLA, and its attorneys? It is worth mentioning that Ms. Esaghian's employment at Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad shortly thereafter came to an end and she when out on her own to practice law. But UTLA will not give her any money to defend targeted teachers, which remains the sole 40 year fiefdom of Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad."
LikeLike
Ravitch: I will be visiting this fall and will try to meet with him/her.
Do you have any speaches or public appearances scheduled while you’re in California? Northern Cal? Southern Cal?
LikeLike
not yet. I am visiting family but will have time to meet with decision makers.
LikeLike
NPR covered the museum opening but didn’t mention the protest.
LikeLike
Of course they wouldn’t report the protest. After all, NPR has sold out to Bill Gates and the corporate education reformers want to keep the resistance out of the news as long as possible so they can control what most of the public sees and hears.
LikeLike
Ravitch: not yet. I am visiting family but will have time to meet with decision makers.
Maybe worthwhile to find out of the legislature will be in session in Sacramento. I don’t have any specific recommendations on which legislators to meet however. You probably have some contacts who could make suggestions.
LikeLike
“this is about embedding people into schools,….”
That’s quite true on a few counts.
Embedded with PR to create a media bubble where no info is permitted to bubble up or break out. Message is “Keep Calm and shut the $#%% up.”
Embedded with school services from charters who sign our district up with ever changing and “pilot” on-line learning companies with weak privacy laws. More data shared with universities and no knowledge of how its safeguarded.
As a CA based parent, I see lots of professional development embedded too. Problem is, the kids are the lab rats. When you go to a teaching hospital, I get it but now the schools are embedded with teacher’s teachers. The teachers are being instructed at the same time our kids are supposed to be learning. This wedges more space between teacher and student. Big sigh.
And the other embedding… that’s the Promise…as in Promise Neighborhoods (Cradle to Grave) what have you. Data mining in the police state where school nurses are getting module training (8 hrs worth) to become first line “psych” evaluators. There will be loads of psychiatrists embedded into our schools and they’ll be recommending the drugs for ADHD, etc. Already happening. With any embedded services you’ll be linked to a database like this self proclaimed, “spoke” model http://echo.unm.edu/about-echo/model/
This is all the Billionaire Boys Club at work. This was all part of the plan to profit off Public Ed.
One Look at the top Industries by percent of Revolving Doors make everything quite clear indeed.
Look at the stats by industry in what’s known as the REVOLVING DOOR.
https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/
LikeLike
Sounds sensible to me. I will re-post it on my blog, ”
the “Treasure Hunter” to make sure that plenty of teachers see it, too.
LikeLike
This sounds great, but how is it going to survive if we have continued federal pressure? What about private charters and the segregation going on?
LikeLike
Fingers crossed…
😎
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads and commented:
This sounds very positive. I hope that not only can it be fully implemented, but that it even expands.
LikeLike
Brown has sold us out by appointing Michael Kirst as Pres. of Bd. of Ed who just stated in April that –
CA Ed IS NOT ABOUT PROFICIENCY–SO THERE IS NOTHING ANY PARENT OR TEACHER CAN DO TO TURN CA EDUCATION AROUND UNTIL THESE GUYS LEAVE
https://cabinetreport.com/curriculum-instruction/ca-readies-new-student-report-cards-on-common-core-testing?utm_source=Michelle%27s+daily+email%2C+May+20%2C+2015&utm_campaign=Daily_4-24-15&utm_medium=email
“We’re not communicating proficiency,” Mike Kirst, president of the California State Board of Education said in an interview this week. “That’s a federal word that they use and we’re not. It’s just not part of the thinking here.”
LikeLike
Brown, unfortunately, also appointed charter owner/CEO of the 16 PUD schools, Refugio Rodriguez (who ran the dirtiest campaign in recent memory and whose audited reports show so many potentially illegal discrepancies) and now LAUSD BoE member, to the prestigious state committee on education.
We should be calling on our Gov to dump him from all state functions on ed.
LikeLike
Love your work, Diane. All power to you …. paragon, rather than paradigm?
LikeLike
Andy,
I meant paradigm, as in a model, an exemplar, a standard
LikeLike
Tom Torlackson and Jerry Brown know what they are doing. Democracy in action!
LikeLike
This is why I place cautious faith in the, ahem, cough, U.S. Senate’s ECAA to stop the White House’s Common Core carrots and sticks from being used against California and other states. I realize that not every state has people like Torlackson and Cohn, and that’s one reason why I bet many of you good readers disagree with the ECAA (in addition to the continued every 3-8 grade testing), but at least this super sized state influences the national conversation to a degree second only to New York. And without federal bribes and threats, California Governor Jerry Brown will do his darnedest to save our public schools. No merit pay for him, though.
LikeLike
Number one issue is poverty. Unless students have adequate housing, good nutrition and health care, it will be difficult for them to do well in school. In addition, this emphasis on testing must stop!
LikeLike
If it sounds too good to be true…
The CCEE website explains their purpose, “…to provide advice and assistance to LEAs in acheiving the goals set forth in the LCAPs.”. That’s it. Nothing more.
So, if you are familiar with the requirements within the LCAP and the process to create it, you will find that Mr. Cohn’s words are empty. Very empty. The LCAP is a direct product of NCLB accountability. Diane, I am perplexed. How will Mr.Cohn, “emphasize teaching and learning and support for schools” when the LCAP has no such requirements?
Unfortunately, California continues to find ways to take resources away from classrooms. And sadly, this “new” agency will offer nothing of substance to children and learning.
LikeLike
I would not pass negative judgment on this agency before it starts its work. The fact that it will be led by Carl Cohn is reason for hope in a time when we celebrate hope wherever it may be found.
LikeLike
Mr. Cohn is mandated to judge districts by standardized testresults (see my comment below) how can one take a “wait and see” approach to this? If this isn’t part of the Gates-Walton-Broad vision, I’ll eat my Panama.
LikeLike
Richard,
I know Carl Cohn. He restored civility to San Diego after several years of a Broad-style slash-and-burn takeover. I trust him. So I will wait and see if he is able to overcome the negative forces that demand measure-and-punish.
LikeLike
With all due respect, Diane, the LCAP directive has been set for this year. Testing and online learning with professional development that takes place in classroom. One teacher teaching another so who is teaching the kids?
LikeLike
Great, a new bureaucracy thAt does nothing but run by an educator, token concession that will mean nothing or do anything about excessive testing, teacher abuse, proliferation of charters. We need something meaningful, this is not it.
LikeLike
I think whether LCAP works or not depends on having a good, representative cross-section of the district community involved in the discussion, and also having a good process for discussing and distilling community input into a workable plan.
I think it’s hard to achieve both of those, so likely LCAP will have mixed results. In many districts, I think LCAP will probably default to district administrative priorities, especially in the absence of effective community input or a good LCAP process, because they are the ones managing the LCAP process.
I get the feeling that in many districts, the local communities have lost a sense of having control over local education because of all the state and federal mandates. The thinking becomes, “what does the state and federal government require us to do? rather than “what kind of local schools do we want?”
LikeLike
One thing I would add that I like about LCAP is that it begins to look for other measures of educational success besides standardized test scores. Measures such as dropout rates/graduation rates, rates of disciplinary action, and climate survey data. These begin to get into areas of non-cognitive components of education. I still think there are other reasonable and meaningful measures to consider than these.
It definitely isn’t perfect, but it’s nice to see some broadening of thinking in this area.
LikeLike
Read an interesting article about Sacramento mayor Kevin Johnson (Mr. Michelle Rhee) on deadspin.com today. Johnson apparently tried to use his position as head of the National Conference of Black Mayors as a stalking horse for charter takeovers. When the NCBM wouldn’t go along, he filed bankruptcy papers for the NCBM, froze their assets and put his own lawyers in charge of their bankruptcy proceedings, then created a new organization the next day, the “African American Mayors Association,” with himself in charge.
http://deadspin.com/whos-funding-kevin-johnsons-secret-government-1731005808
LikeLike
All the recent news on Kevin Johnson, and his push for higher office, plus his many blatant sexual pecadillos, and determined greed in acquiring more profits from his and Rhee’s many charter schools, should probably make him ripe for indictment rather than enrichment.
LikeLike
“. . . should probably make him ripe for indictment rather than enrichment.”
Ah, but this is America, Ellen.
LikeLike
Yes, the U.S. is where capitalism and crime are bedfellows and greed is good for the top 1%. The rest of us are just so much meat. The sad thing is that a lot of the meat supports the crazy, greedy, criminal elite that’s butchering everyone else.
LikeLike
Sounds like more bureaucracy and who does this agency answer to? The California DOE, or someone else. How does this agency deal with more testing and increasing charters? If none of these are in its authority, whT good is it?
LikeLike
Sounds bad to me:
Cohn will oversee the California Collaborative on Educational Excellence/ “The Collaborative’s purpose is to “advise and assist” school districts and charter schools in achieving the goals of their accountability plan”
—
The plan must spell out the district’s goals for improving student outcomes according to eight priorities [first of which is “Student achievement as measured by performance on standardized tests, the Academic Performance Index, the proportion of students who are “college and career ready”] set by the state, and align spending to meet the goals. Districts that fail to meet their goals and improve student outcomes will receive assistance from county offices of education and through a new agency, the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence. Districts that are persistently failing could be subject to state intervention or even a state takeover.
http://edsource.org/publications/local-control-funding-formula-guide
LikeLike
Thanks Richard for posting this valuable link which shows the distribution of funding from the State.
As you can see, over 80% is divided between all public schools, but the other ‘almost’ 20% goes to the neediest schools which serve poverty level students. Since our State has the largest population in the nation of poverty level and diverse inner city students, this allocation was vital to bring some equity.
The billionaires, with Broad leading the charge, want to defeat this allocation by taking over the schools for their own profiteering. (Broad cheered on our Gov in this past election for Prop.30, while secretly funding an alternate Prop. 32 paid for by hugely wealthy Munger, the younger,whose papa is Buffets partner.) They seem to prefer retaining a perpetual under educated, under class to do their dirty work while they prepare charter students for the rote, compliant, work force they need.
We in California, do also however remember the greedy anger shown by some wealthier parents at this distribution after the hard fought election for Prop. 30 funding. Brown played hard ball and threatened to do away with school buses, etc., it the voters did not support his proposition…which we did.
LikeLike
Forgot to mention that both Mungers, sister and brother sibs of billionaire Berkshire Hathaway papa, had horses in the race in the school funding election two years ago. One financed Prop. 32, and the other funded Prop. 38. Of these two scions of major 1% wealth, the Pasadena attorney sister seems by far the more reasonable. (The LA Times printed my letter to the editor at the time, on both of them.)
Fortunately is was Gov Brown’s Prop. 30 which won.
LikeLike
Wow! We ed junkies look for such news… something that says there is a rational leader somewhere to shed light, and dispel the hokum dispensed by LAUSD’s version of Donald Trump… blowhard, sleazy Deasy, and the charlatans that have dug the grave of LAUSD.
This interview with Carl Cohen is what we long for, someone out there, like Bernie, who refuses to deviate from the actual truth, the facts… in this case the things that make learning possible — for as I say here, and everywhere (preaching to the choir as I do) IT IS ALL ABOUT LEARNING.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Learning-not-Teacher-evalu-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-111001-956.html
“THEY” subverted the conversation, as I wrote so long ago,
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/08/subverting-the-national-conversation-a.html
even as Arne argued his ‘reform,’ mantra… cut as it was from the cloth woven by Broad, Walton, Pearson and clones. Met the clone Klein in NYC, as Bloomberg dismantled public education in the name reform. I watched, as Perdaily exposed every wart and fart as LAUSD went down…. but no one paid attention.
So it is with a sigh of relief, that there is someone with the vision to RETURN to the professional approach to learning.
But will anyone but us listen to what Carl offers as a real approach, when if is ALL about money.
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/06/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html
LikeLike
Mr. Cohn: the reformers don’t know, but those on the ground don’t know much better, unfortunately. Teachers’ heads are filled with thought cliches learned in ed school, such as “be the guide at the side rather than a sage on the stage.” Consult truly brilliant thinkers on education –ED Hirsch is one; there are others. See Diane’s Left Back for wise thinkers that the edu establishment has left behind.
LikeLike
Let’s see if any of this results in more money to hire teachers so that these “struggling” schools can lower class size. This requires long-term commitment or we’ll be back here in a few years. Otherwise this is just window dressing and legacy polishing.
LikeLike
I’d prefer same class size but two teachers per class.
LikeLike
Just watched all three nightly news stations, CBS, NBC, and ABC…and not one mentioned the Broad opening, nor the teacher protest.
LikeLike
The local affiliates covered it on their websites:
Los Angeles CBS
Los Angeles ABC, w/ video
Los Angeles NBC
Also,
LA Times
LikeLike
What does Cohn’s statement mean? Seems awfully generalized. Here is what I would hope it means: an end to staff development unless it is inquiry based, collaborative, and constructive; support for teachers to attend state and national subject area conferences; a consultant hired for the school who knows and has a lot of experience in the subject area in which he/she is consulting. (Bright eyed and bushy tailed doesn’t cut it. Been there, done that myself.); on-site tech support employed so that when tech is used it is working and useful; a compendium of current software and on-line open source programs by subject published; reasonable class size established, especially for classes in which wheel chairs are in use and/or special ed students are pushed-in; and many other practical and relatively less expensive ideas than those offered by the charter version of reform, starting with curriculum, discipline and clustering, the real reason parents support charters. (See letters in today’s Los Angeles Times.)
It has been brought to my attention that for-profit charters are mot recommended from a financial point of view in CA because of the looming teacher shortage.
LikeLike