The Los Angeles Times endorses Eli Broad’s plan to move at least half the public school students into privately managed charter schools.
It does so while recognizing that charter schools have (at best) a “mixed record.”
“The school district shouldn’t seek to rein in charter growth, but it and the state should be doing a better job of overseeing such schools. There have been numerous reports that charter schools, in an effort to improve their test scores, have prodded their lowest-performing students to leave and return to traditional public schools. This never has been proved, but then again, no one has ever bothered trying to find out. The concerns have been worrisome enough, though, that new school board member Ref Rodriguez — a charter supporter and co-founder of a group of charter schools — wants the issue thoroughly investigated.
“There also have been scattered cases of charter schools ensuring that they enroll only the most motivated and successful students by setting high bars for interested families, such as parent-volunteering requirements and long application essays. Efforts to cherry-pick students are unacceptable; charter schools are supposed to accept all comers, just as regular public schools do. (If too many apply, charter schools are supposed to use a lottery.) When they have been caught breaking or bending the rules, it has generally been by the media and student advocacy groups, not by the agencies responsible for approving and checking up on charter schools. The only serious official scrutiny that charter operators typically get is when they are issued the right to operate, and five years later when they apply for renewal. It would seem a more thoughtful approach could be developed.”
So, let’s see. Neither the city not the state has the staff to oversee charters. The editorial board has heard rumors that charters exclude children with high needs and low scores. Well, let’s just right ahead, demolish public education, and see what happens next.

Reading the LA Times today would make one believe that Eli Broad has already purchased LA’s only local print media, and that his vast wealth has made his takeover of this city ‘a fait accompli.’
Between the front page article on his museum, to the Arts section full page photo of this owner of all things that can be bought, to the lengthy article on his vulture philanthropy…it is all about ELI.
Then when you read the lead editorial, it is clear that he owns the Times editorial and news writers who laud his bid to make 50% of LAUSD schools into charters. rapidly. This means 300,000 students will be trained in the most questionable fashion by such failed charter operators as Green Dot which has fled from New Orleans in yet one more disgrace. And the editorial even mentions the new BoE charter owner Rodriguez who now sits in the catbird seat on the LAUSD school board.
This onshluss has been in the planning by Broad and his boys, Deasy and Austin, and now he can thumb his nose at all the public school workers, unions, parents, community activists. His selfie book described his goal to always win…and it seems he is achieving this.
LikeLike
Thanks, Ellen.
LikeLike
The Los Angeles Teachers union UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES., UTLA, is calling for a protest at the opening of a new museum build in part from Broad philanthropy:
Next Sunday (a week from doday,
September 20
9:00 am
at 2nd & Grand
Well, last February UTLA had 15,000 fill up Grand Park, near the new museum. Let’s do it again!
Behind the scenes, pressure is being applied to UTLA leaders to call this off. Here’s an email from UTLA president Alex Caputo-Pearl.
————————————————
UTLA: “Local politicians are pressuring UTLA to call off our protest outside the new Broad Museum on its opening day, September 20. Eli Broad must be worried. We will not be stopped in our fight against the billionaire Broad and his plan to dismantle LAUSD by pulling half the students out of public district schools and putting them in unregulated, non-union charters.
“These schools aren’t required to play by the same rules as others, and an expanding unregulated sector encourages a competitive model, which is not appropriate for public education. Join us for the protest and news conference–beginning at 9:30 a.m. on Sunday, September 20, at 2nd and Grand.
“Broad funded similar plans in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, and his ‘reform’ there has resulted in massive equity, access, and civil rights violations for students, as segregation has been reinforced and special education students have been left behind. We cannot let this happen in LAUSD. A New Orleans parent who lived through this nightmare will speak at our news conference.
“Invite your friends, family and colleagues to join us outside the Broad Museum. Here is a flyer in English:
Click to access SavetheDateSept_30_VERSION_4_Layout_1.pdf
and here is a flyer in Spanish:
Click to access SavetheDateSept_30_V4Spanish_Layout_1.pdf
“UTLA President Alex Caputo-Pearl has challenged Broad to a public debate on public education. Caputo-Pearl laid out the case against Broad during a lengthy interview on KABC-TV over the weekend.
“Click here to view the interview:
LikeLike
Glad to hear of your activism.
LikeLike
Brief recap of LAUSD elections:
In 2011, 30-year teacher Bennett Kayser won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2013, 17-year teacher Steve Zimmer won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2013, 13-year teacher Monica Ratliff won, despite being outspent 42-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2014, teacher & principal George McKenna won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
In 2015, teacher & principal Scott Schmerelson won, despite being outspent 5-to-1 by the corporate privatizers.
Eli and the billionaires lose again and again at the polls
The voters-citizens-taxpayers have spoken loud and clear that they do not want their schools privatized, and that they want the the corporate privatizers’ backed by money-motivated, predatory billionaires to get the-hell out of, and stay the-hell out of LAUSD.
Undaunted at all his candidates losing, Billionaire Eli Broad others announced that he was pumping $1 billion dollars into charter expansion in Los Angeles… even though the voters have vehemently rejected this:
The arrogant attitude of Broad, Gates, the Waltons, etc. is…
“Elections schm-elections… school boards, schm-ool boards…
“At the end of the day, we really don’t give a sh#% what the citizens, the parents, and the taxpayers want. If we can’t buy control of the the board via the election process, we’re still gonna shove money-motivated privatization and charterization down the public’s throats whether they want it or not.
“So those unwashed masses should just shut up and accept it!”
LikeLike
I was disgusted with how much positive coverage the Times gave to the Broad family. Almost as disgusted as when they decided to promote Ref and his charter school fanatic friends for the school board. Ref had a unusually expensive campaign this year whose funding mostly came from CCSA and the charter school trifecta- Broad, Walton, and Gates foundations. These organizations, which very much have a say in what pro charter school board members vote for, are not accountable to teachers, parents, and the community as a whole. I cannot vote for who is going to head the Broad foundation, so we have very unaccountable and authoritarian organizations deciding our school policies, which is ironic because they say they want more accountability- which really means they want either for unions not to exist or to weaken them badly (isn’t a case going to the Supreme Court which could potentially weaken them further?).
I have a feeling that Ref only won because he was a handsome Latino man in a heavily Latino district. If only people knew what they were voting for- it was essentially a referendum on the future of public schools in LAUSD and perhaps the country in general.
LikeLike
“I have a feeling that Ref only won because he was a handsome Latino man in a heavily Latino district. If only people knew what they were voting for- it was essentially a referendum on the future of public schools in LAUSD and perhaps the country in general.”
It’s worse than you think.
A group allied with Ref had a lottery—the “loteria-voteria”—that was conducted in only one part of Ref’s district… the heavily Latino district. Here’s how it worked: Latinos who voted all got a simultaneous lottery ticket, with the winners getting cash prizes, the top prize being $25,000.
It’s important to note that they did not market this lottery in any of the other parts or Ref’s district, nor in any of the other 3 school board races—just the Latino part. The strategy is that clueless low-income Latinos, who otherwise would have not voted, would show up at the polls to get the lottery chance at the cash, then look at the ballot and see two names “Bennett Kayser” and “Refugio Rodriguez” , then out of total ignorance, choose Ref… and that’s exactly what happened.
This was such a scandal that even the L.A. Times, who had endorsed Ref, was outraged by the precedent of an outside group actually paying for votes…not with money, but again, with a chance at money.
The school privatization proponents behind this should all be thrown in jail.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-voteria-vote-to-win-cash-lottery-20150421-story.html
L.A. TIMES: “The winner gets $25,000. The losers are the people who still believe in the integrity of the democratic process.
“This gimmick perverts the motivation to vote. It demeans the value of voting. And it’s the most superficial pseudo-solution to a very real problem in Los Angeles, which is the pervasive civic malaise that prevents so many eligible voters from feeling truly engaged. In fact, the voteria only underscores the cynical view that people don’t care about their local government anymore and the only way to get them to vote is to bribe them.
“When the Los Angeles Ethics Commission floated a similar lottery proposal last year, The Times called it one of the worst ideas put forward in a long time. But even that was better than the voteria. Why? Because at least a city-sponsored contest would be clearly non-ideological and not aimed at influencing one particular election.
‘The Southwest Voter Registration Education Project is a well-meaning organization with a long history of working to increase voter participation in the Latino community — but what if this cash prize ends up being advertised more heavily in the Latino community in District 5?
“What if it brings out more Latinos than, say, African Americans?
“Is it fair that one demographic has more of a financial incentive to vote?
“What if in the next school board election an African American group decides it should pay voters even more to turn out?
“Or a Republican group?
“Or the teachers union or a charter school group?
“This is a troubling precedent that could easily devolve into an arms race among interest groups trying to get out their votes to influence an election.
“Yes, low turnout is bad. It allows the few to make decisions for the many, and that undermines the integrity of our representative democracy. Angelenos were so concerned about low turnout that they voted in March to move local elections to June and November of even-numbered years to coincide with gubernatorial and presidential elections. That is a meaningful reform that should boost turnout simply by capturing local voters who show up for higher-profile elections. Groups like the Southwest Voter Registration Education Project are right to look for innovative ways to engage voters.
“But dangling money in front of polling places is not the way to do it.”
LikeLike
In Buffalo the same sorts of funds were used to “buy” the election of pro Charter School aboard members. It was an interim Suoerintendent who looked at the Charter School proposal and realized it didn’t make sense who squashed their plans and was fired for showing integrity (the firing didn’t work, but he resigned saying he didn’t need to deal with all the crap). We have a new Suoerintendent all but appointed by Elia ( another story) who
LikeLike
I get so discouraged the more I read about districts across the county. We have an important school board election in our Thompson district in Colorado this November, and we’re hoping that the controversy caused by reformers in our small district will spawn a significant rejection of the undemocratic tactics they’ve employed. Still it’s the “David” of parents, students and teachers against the “Goliath” of outside money pouring in to influence the outcome. Our neighbors in Jeffco and Douglas county are also pushing back, but the outcome isn’t guaranteed. Is there good news anywhere on the horizon?
LikeLike
One of the billionaires out to privatize LAUSD is Netflix CEO Reeed Hastings. This is the same Reed Hastings that called for the abolishing of all school boards when he gave the keynote speech at last years California Charter Schools Association convention:
EED HASTINGS (March 3, 2004):“The importance of the charter school movement is to evolve America from a system where governance is constantly changing… (i.e. democratically elected school boards, where the citizen-taxpayers have decision-making power.) to an all-charter school system, with no traditional public schools under the governance of an elected school board.)
Hastings further says charter school chains are superior because “they don’t have an elected school board.” He celebrates New Orleans system where every school is a privately-run charter with ZERO accountability to the public, and where the public has ZERO power to influence their governance.
“Now if we go to the general public and we say, ‘Here’s an argument for why we should get rid of school boards,’ of course, no one’s going to go for that.School boards have been and iconic part of America for 200 years.”
Since in most cities, corporate reformers cannot do a New Orleans-style wiping out of democratically controlled school boards—as there’s no Katrina-like catastrophe to exploit—Hastings instead recommends a slow, deceptive, stealth strategy. He instructs the charter schools and their advocates to “work with districts” quietly and “grow steadily”.This means that the charter industry will falsely profess that they wish to co-exist with the traditional public schools, and complement the public school system, while the truth is that they are merely putting on that façade with the ultimate goal being the total elimination of public schools via this “slow growth” strategy.
The other prong of this strategy—one that the billionaires engage in will be engaging in—is to sabotage the traditional public schools through starving of them of funds, jacking up class size, cutting the arts, libraries, etc. … all to trigger low performance… and use that low performance that they initially and actually caused, as justification for closing public schools and replacing them with private charter management.
Eventually, as the percentage of traditional LAUSD public schools shrinks, and the percentage of charter schools within LAUSD grows, they cost of maintaining the salary, health benefits, retirement, etc.will cause the district to collapse from within.The end game is a small pseudo-“board” whose sole function is to rubber stamp charter school authorizing… and no control actual over charter schools’ functions after doing so… no transparency to the public, no accountability to the public, and that can and will refuse to educate all of the public—i.,e. those who are expensive to educate, and who will not produce high scores on tests… special ed., English language learners, recent immigrants, homeless, foster care.
This is also laid out in the Andy Smarick master plan. (SEE BELOW)
LikeLike
Corporate ed. reform theorist and strategist Andy Smarick let the cat out of the bag as to their billionaire privatizers’ secret game plan… still available on-line. (link BELOW) In districts where there is still an elected school board, people like Reed Hastings, Bill Gates, Eli Broad, etc. finance the campaigns of corporate puppets like Ref to carry it out.
BELOW Smarick details this plan of using a slow, stealth charterization to cause the collapse of public school districts and public ecudation overall:
http://educationnext.org/wave-of-the-future/
(If any privatization ever tries to claim that they want charter schools to complement the public school system, or co-exist with public schools to provide parents with “a family of different school options—public, charter private”… RE-READ THIS BELOW. The privatizers don’t want co-existence; they want to conquer and devour all… and don’t you forget it—check out New Orleans… THE WALL STREET PRIVATIZERS / CHARTERIZERS WANT IT ALL).
(CAPS MINE and parentheticals () mine, Jack)
————————-
——————–
ANDY SMARICK:
“Clearly we can’t expect the political process to swiftly bring about charter districts in all of America’s big cities. However, if charter advocates carefully target specific systems with an exacting strategy, the current policy environment will allow them to create examples of a new, high-performing system of public education in urban America.
“Here, in short, is one roadmap for chartering’s way forward:
“FIRST, commit to drastically increasing the charter market share in a few select communities until it is the dominant system and the district is reduced to a secondary provider. The target should be 75 percent.
“SECOND, choose the target communities wisely. Each should begin with a solid charter base (at least 5 percent market share), a policy environment that will enable growth (fair funding, nondistrict authorizers, and no legislated caps), and a favorable political environment (friendly elected officials and editorial boards, a positive experience with charters to date, and unorganized opposition).
“For example, in New York a concerted effort could be made to site in Albany or Buffalo a large percentage of the 100 new charters allowed under the raised cap. Other potentially fertile districts include Denver, Detroit, Kansas City, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, New Orleans, Oakland, and Washington, D.C.
“THIRD, secure proven operators to open new schools. To the greatest extent possible, growth should be driven by replicating successful local charters and recruiting high-performing operators from other areas (see Figure 2).
“FOURTH, engage key allies like Teach For America, New Leaders for New Schools, and national and local foundations to ensure the effort has the human and financial capital needed.
“LAST, commit to rigorously assessing charter performance in each community and working with authorizers to close the charters that fail to significantly improve student achievement.
“In total, these strategies should lead to rapid, high-quality charter growth and the development of a public school marketplace marked by parental choice, the regular start-up of new schools, the improvement of middling schools, the replication of high-performing schools, and the shuttering of low-performing schools.
“AS CHARTERING INCREASES ITS MARKET SHARE IN A CITY, THE DISTRICT WILL COME UNDER GROWING FINANCIAL PRESSURE. The district, despite educating fewer and fewer students, will still require a large administrative staff to process payroll and benefits, administer federal programs, and oversee special education. WITH A LOPSIDED ADULT-TO-STUDENT RATIO, THE DISTRICT’S PER-PUPIL COSTS WILL SKYROCKET.
“At some point along the district’s path from monopoly provider to financially unsustainable marginal player, the city’s investors and stakeholders—taxpayers, foundations, business leaders, elected officials, and editorial boards—are likely to demand fundamental change.
“That is, EVENTUALLY THE FINANCIAL CRISIS WILL BECOME A POLITICAL CRISIS.
“If the district has progressive leadership, ONE OF TWO BEST-CASE SCENARIOS WILL RESULT:
“THE DISTRICT COULD VOLUNTARILY BEGIN THE SHIFT TO AN AUTHORIZER, developing a new relationship with its schools and reworking its administrative structure to meet the new conditions.
“Or, believing the organization is unable to make this change, THE DISTRICT COULD GRADUALLY TRANSFER ITS SCHOOLS TO AN ESTABLISHED AUTHORIZER.
(In other words… Bye, bye, traditional public schools—the ones accountable and transparent to the citizen-taxpayers! Hello, total privatization of schools where the public loses all input and decision-making power to the private sector! Andy Smarick’s wet-dream-come-true!)
“A more probable district reaction to the mounting pressure would be an aggressive political response. Its leadership team might fight for a charter moratorium or seek protection from the courts. Failing that, they might lobby for additional funding so the district could maintain its administrative structure despite the vast loss of students. Reformers should expect and prepare for this phase of the transition process.
“In many ways, replacing the district system seems inconceivable, almost heretical. Districts have existed for generations, and in many minds, the traditional system is synonymous with public education.
“However, the history of urban districts’ inability to provide a high-quality education to their low-income students is nearly as long. It’s clear that we need a new type of system for urban public education, one that is able to respond nimbly to great school success, chronic school failure, and everything in between. A chartered system could do precisely that.”
————————————
That’s the billionaire privatizers’ gameplan that Broad and company wish to execute as he follows the orders of his corporate masters. In short, there’s no New Orleans’ Hurricaine Katrina to go all “Shock Doctrine” on the public school systems in other cities like Los Angeles, so what’s a privatizer to do?
Just induce a financial and political crisis that will eventrually destroy the public schools (re-read Smarick’s plan above). Again, it’s straight out of The Shock Doctrine.
Eventually, as the percentage of traditional LAUSD public schools shrinks, and the percentage of charter schools within LAUSD grows, the cost of maintaining the district’s salary, health benefits, retirement, etc.will cause the district to collapse from within.
The end game is then to replace our current board (and democratic system) with a small pseudo-“board” whose sole function is to rubber stamp charter school authorizing… and which has no control actual over charter schools’/charter chains’ functions after doing so… no transparency to the public, no accountability to the public, and that can and will refuse to educate all of the public—i.,e. those who are expensive to educate, and who will not produce high scores on tests… special ed., English language learners, recent immigrants, homeless, foster care.
That’s why out-of-state billionaires, Wall Street hedge fund charter proponents, etc. are pumping millions into privatizing LAUSD schools
Again, for a short video summary of Smarick’s plan, watch the Reed Hastings’ speech again:
LikeLike
Yeah, good thinking, because, you know, the evidence definitely supports this….
LikeLike
I was born in Los Angeles country and grew up reading the LA Times. Now all I want to do is burn the paper my parents once subscribed to when I was a child and I subscribed to until I earned my BA in journalism after learned how unreliable, political, biased and unbalanced most of the traditional media is.
I do not think there is any different between 90% of the traditional U.S. media that is owned and controlled by SIX corporations with CEO’s who are all white men who are paid eight-to-nine figure annual incomes and Xinhua News Agency, the official press agency of the People’s Republic of China.
But there is one big difference, in Communist China all of the people, even the party bosses, know that most of what Xinhua reports on sensitive issues can’t be trusted, so they tend to think the opposite is true. To find out what’s really going on, the president of China often slips out of his office in average clothing and mingles with common people to hear what they are talking about because he knows he can’t trust what he reads in the state run media.
In the U.S. about half of the people trust everything they hear or read from the big SIX.
LikeLike
Lying Liars will Lie!
“There have been numerous reports that charter schools, in an effort to improve their test scores, have prodded their lowest-performing students to leave and return to traditional public schools. This never has been proved, but then again, no one has ever bothered trying to find out.”
LikeLike
Who? The teachers who see their classes with new students before testing time or the Times in general?
LikeLike
Pardon me, teachers who see their class sizes swell with new students…
LikeLike
Who? The Lying Liars? The Times.
LikeLike
Thanks Duane. I agree.
LikeLike
Eli Broad made a significant portion of his money from real estate. Wouldn’t it interest a journalist to investigate his intense interest in charters & the possible relationship to his real estate empire?
LikeLike
I have often written about this Jcgrim…as recently as today on a Ravitch post. Others have as well.
If LAUSD were to go bankrupt, it would be a major boon to developers like Eli Broad. See what happened in Chicago when Rahm closed 50 South Side public schools.
It is worthwhile to read the Broad history of his KB, Kaufman and Broad, cheap tract homes built in low end areas…and who ended up with indictments. Same goes for his senior citizen insurance investments.
This guy is a cutthroat tycoon, lacking empathy. See also his involvement in the fiasco of the worst LA site for a high school which cost the district a fortune and his involvement. Even though Eli has ‘scrubbed’ much of this, there is still much to read about him online…make the effort…
LikeLike
What are California charters like? Are they in the FL, OH, MI, PA “complete chaos” group or more like the NYC and Boston “elite, planned” group? Somewhere in between?
I know CA has more than anywhere else but is that mostly due to how huge California is?
LikeLike
LA has more charters than any other city in the nation…and California has more than any other state. There are a vast array…with Palisades HS being an example of the best, and endless little throw away charters being on the same level as the worst in Florida and Ohio. Google it Chiara…it is all online. Remember, yet again, that Green Dot, Milkin’s K -12, and the farce that is Parent Revolution, all started in LA.
It is tiresome for those of us who have been writing here for YEARS to repeat it all…so please folks…do your homework. Use google and also read Ravitch archives. It is all online. None of this is new news. The only real new news is my prediction that Eli Broad will be the sole owner of the LA Times in the next few weeks. Hope I am proven wrong.
LikeLike
Thanks. I figured they couldn’t do a “massive” expansion without a large charter management company or companies and I’m familiar with Green Dot.
I think it’s terrifying that 5 billionaires are “transforming” the US public school system. I don’t think this ends well. I think we’ll regret it.
LikeLike
Just finished correcting essays, and posted a few comments to the editorial. Comments suggest the Times editors are very much out of step with public opinion.
LikeLike
LeftCoast Teacher: how do you post comments to this editorial? Does a comments section appear online only to subscribers! I also checked at FB, but did not find this editorial.
LikeLike
Just go to latimes.com/education. I never get locked out like some newspaper sites.
LikeLike
Chiara, don’t mistake the genteel, patrician facade of the “elite, planned” charter cheerleaders here in Boston for what is behind it – greed and pomposity just as elsewhere. Half of the state’s charters are located in the city of Boston and although the legislature last year voted to keep a cap on the number of charters, a ballot initiative to remove the cap has just been certified to go to voters.
Oh, and speaking of Green Dot, our new superintendent is Tommy Chang, late of Green Dot and LAUSD’s iPad debacle, and he’s begun hiring TFA’ers and their ilk to staff his office and to head up schools. His Chief of Staff’s last position was with Families for Excellent Schools. At a ribbon cutting ceremony last week, the mayor announced that perhaps six schools are slated to be closed within the year. Our new republican governor has charteristas from the Pioneer Institute on his ed staff.
LikeLike
Christine, things are not looking good for Boston. Too many charter cheerleaders.
LikeLike
No, Diane, they are not. We had a preliminary runoff election last Tuesday in two districts for City Council. In District 4, the top vote getter was a recepient of campaign contributions from DFER, MATCH, Mass Inc, and from each of the three white-shoe law firms who are doing pro-bono work on the lawsuit to remove the charter cap. Boston currently is penalized by the law which allows for up to 18 percent of its school budget to be spent on charter school tuition. 87% of Boston students are of color and so many qualify for free or reduced lunch that all students receive lunch at no charge.
There is a group of parents and allies trying to fight back. See John Lerner’s posts at:
http://ihadthreechairs.blogspot.com/2015_09_01_archive.html
LikeLike
See also:https://publicschoolmama.wordpress.com
LikeLike
I don’t respect the Los Angeles Times.
LikeLike
I wonder if there will be massive public school closures like there were in Chicago. I don’t know how else they “phase out” public schools so quickly without closing a bunch.
Gosh, I sure hope this billionaire knows what he’s doing. Is the plan already a done deal or are we going to pretend to have another “debate” when the outcome is pre-determined?
LikeLike
Many of the charter schools are embedded at the public school sites. The charters get the additional economic perk of a free or low rent site as the public school must live side by side with them, or is phased out totally.
LikeLike
What I love about privatization schemes is how we are always, always promised “regulation”.
And how that never, ever happens. Over and over and over.
With each privatization scheme comes the same people earnestly insisting it will be “regulated”. I mean, really. They must be absolute morons to continue to believe this.
Privatization + regulation= better. That’s the theoretical formula and they have been selling the same BS for 30 years and every. single. time. the Best and the Brightest buy it. John Kasich is selling it right now with Social Security and I can guarantee these same people will eagerly buy, because there’s no cure for this- hope springs eternal 🙂
LikeLike
In the Buffalo Public Schools there is a case in court questioning how the more elite schools, such as City Honors and Olmsted, select their student populations. From experience, I know this is a blind process where several factors are examined with the name and race of the student unknown to the evaluator. However, I also know sometimes judgement calls are made regarding individual students. While I personally am not aware of anything “nefarious” occurring, obviously someone has some doubts.
Would that ever happen with a Charter School? It seems they can pretty much set any policy they’d like without accounting to anyone. I’d be curious to hear about any of those schools being brought to court (although the managers of prematurely closed charters who abscond with the upfronted funds should be sent to jail for embezzlement).
I’m sure Diane and her minions (myself included) will keep us all informed if they hear of any of these “not for profit” schools hauled before the courts to answer for their misdeeds.
Can’t wait to see Diane in West Seneca (just outside the Buffalo City line) – a district with massive opt out numbers.
Ellen T Klock
LikeLike
The LA TIMES editorial board has gone full scale Donald Trump–only they are making less logical sense if that was even possible.
The Times’ Editorial Board think they “know” Los Angeles and can just spout off at will any nonsense because of their wealth, power and influence and think they won’t be called out for it. Please, if anyone can make heads or tails of this completely baffling and contradictory editorial, enlighten us.
There is a point where the editorial board sounds like some crazy old coot.on his front porch spouting off to whoever passes by. “These charter schools are great! Hey! But somebody should see whether they are! Some newspaper should check on that! Or some investigative reporters! Where the hell can we find them to tell us? But until we find them dang reporters, we should turn 50% of the public schools into charters! Fifty percent sounds like a good figure! Who doesn’t like fifty percent? Where’s my dang remote control go?!? Austin! Where’s my remote!”
The privileged coots on the Editorial Board with no kids of their own in the system couldn’t even be bothered to think through what they were saying in this article. I defy even charter school supporters to validate this editorial’s kooky advocation.
A hundred other people will better argue why charter schools are destructive not only to the students of the communities, but our society as a whole.
For right now, someone needs to call the cops and get the editorial board from wandering the streets making a dangerous nuisance of themselves.
LikeLike
Geronimo: while there is a method to the madness of the rheephormistas, on the level of logic and consistency and good sense you’ve captured the word salad and cognitive dissonance that is this editorial.
But don’t believe for a moment that they might take your comments as a call to reflect and be self-critical. As one of those old dead Greek guys said long ago:
“Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.” [Euripides]
You can find it in their playbook, chapter 1, “Sneer, Jeer and Smear: Your Best Friends.”
😎
LikeLike
My thoughts exactly on reading this editorial. On one hand, it seems more enlightened than other LAT editorials over the last year which cheer the Vergara decision, love charters hate teachers unions kiss Broad’s as* w/o question– this one actually raises specters of ‘unregulated expanse’ & cherry-picking (a first?). But on the other hand as you note, such questions are unaccompanied by research or the suggestion that voters might have skin in the game, seeming to exhort them rather to sit on sidelines sucking thumbs while waiting to see what Eli does next with their schools.
LikeLike
Board president Steve Zimmer told the LA Times recently that an aggressive expansion of charters could undermine the district’s own improvement efforts, saying, “The most critical concern would be the collateral damage to the children left behind.”
In an interview with JEWISH JOURNAL,
Zimmer pulls no punches, saying Broad’s plan
is not just an attack on public schools that will
have collateral damage for kids. It’s not about
just adding charters, it’s about changing the
idea of what public education is… and
changing it for the worse.
Unfortunately, he doesn’t use the words “privatize”
or privatization”
He also says this charter expansion is also an attack
on unions as well.
Charter expansion, Zimmer says, “is not about children.”
LAUSD board president Steve Zimmer talks about getting back to basics
http://www.jewishjournal.com/education/article/lausd_board_president_steve_zimmer_talks_about_getting_back_to_basics
Some highlights:
———————————————–
STEVE ZIMMER: “I think there is a difference between support for existing charter schools that parents have chosen [and support more for new charter schools]. I respect and support those choices as long as the charter is doing very well, and I mean very well.”
JEWISH JOURNAL: “Why a different bar for charter schools?”
STEVE ZIMMER: “Because that’s why charters are supposed to exist: either to provide something better, or unique and innovative. Otherwise there’s no compelling reason to authorize them.”
JEWISH JOURNAL: “Do you think there’s any chance to roll back the charter trend?”
STEVE ZIMMER: “We have the most charters of any school district in the nation. We have incredibly high levels of saturation. If choice is so important, the California Charter Schools Association’s agenda and the Walton Family Foundation and other foundations’ agendas to situate more and more charter schools within the LAUSD boundary is not about children. It’s not about choice. It’s not about innovation.”
“It’s about a very different agenda of bringing down the school district, an agenda to dramatically change what is public education.”
“It’s about altering the influence of public sector unions. I just happen to disagree with that agenda. But folks should be explicit about what their agenda is.”
————————————-
JEWISH JOURNAL: “It seems like a lot of the dialogue relating to LAUSD pits teacher against student. If something is good for students, it’s bad for teachers and vice versa.”
STEVE ZIMMER: “How it’s said in my world is whether you have a kid agenda or an adult agenda. That is an incredibly deceptive political construct. Anybody who has spent their career in public school knows that’s a lie. When you’re supporting teachers, you’re supporting kids. When you create a better environment for learning, you’re supporting kids and everyone who works with them.
“That lie — kids versus adults — that lie is a subterfuge about what part of the reform movement is ALL about, which is eviscerating or lessening the influence of public sector unions. A lot of that is focused on teacher unions. Teacher unions are teachers. I’ve been very critical of my own union, and the union I consider to be an ally. [But] there’s a difference between being critical of different policies of a labor union, and believing that union should not exist.
“And a lot of money that fuels the charter and reform movement is by people who believe teacher unions should not exist.”
—————————————–
STEVE ZIMMER: “I’m actually very proud we have some of the highest-performing charters in the country. It takes a lot for me to not renew or to close down an existing charter. But at the point we’re at, a new charter has to be compelling. It has to offer something we don’t have right now, and that is a high bar. I am unapologetic about it.
“I believe in choice, but I am very, very wary. I am very cognizant of the damage that competition (from charter expansion) has done to our schools. And we became obsessed with data instead of being data-informed.
“When a system becomes so obsessed with competition that they view children through their potential to score versus their overall humanity, the dehumanization of that public school system is not something that is attractive to parents, is not something that is warm and inviting. And our public schools, to my great regret, have become test score-obsessed. A lot of charter schools have, too.”
LikeLike
“What John Deasy tried to do to this school district. He tried to bring public education DOWN. And the MISIS crisis was NO accident. That is… that WAS INTENTIONAL.”
— STEVE ZIMMER, May 2015
————————
Steve Zimmer was on the fence for the longest time, but it was through 1-on-1 persuasion of Bennett Kayser that Steve finally ‘got it’—along with witnessing the vicious way corporate reformers went after Bennett during last spring’s school board election.
————————————-
In May, Zimmer recently gave this speech
in support of fellow Board Member
Bennett Kayser’s re-election—
given at a Kayser fundraiser:
(try reading along with the transcript
BELOW, in the following post…
it’s so poetic you can set it to music)
What’s telling is how Zimmer has done “a total 180″
on John Deasy. Remember the days when
Zimmer would reverently refer to Deasy as
“a catalytic change agent” for schools and children?
(That “change agent” quote is from a radio i
nterview with someone (Adolfo?) that is somewhere
on the net… right after Zimmer’s & the Board’s
October 2013 Board vote to keep Deasy and
extend his contract.)
Well, Zimmer’s “catalytic change agent” gushfest
days are totally OVER apparently.
In this latest speech, Zimmer channels
Emile Zola (“J’accuse!!! J’accuse!!!) and boldly
claims that Deasy deliberately caused severe
“disruption”, and willfully wrecked any “stability”
in LAUSD, in order to further privatization, even
if that meant causing “real collateral damage to
real children EVERY DAY” in the process.
In essence, Zimmer argues, and makes the accusation that …
… corporate reformers’ / privatizers’ ultimate and ignoble “ENDS”– privatization and teacher union-busting—in the long run…
… JUSTIFY…
… the corporate reformers’ / privatizers’ strategic and ignoble “MEANS” —“real collateral damage to real children EVERY DAY”—in the short run.
That’s some pretty rough stuff.
In the middle of the speech, Zimmer concedes
that Bennett Kayser had tried to enlighten and
give warning to him about all of this, but
Zimmer says that he had long dismissed
Kayser’s dire forewarnings…
… until NOW., that is.
Zimmer proclaims that… finally (!!!)…
he (Zimmer) gets it regarding what Deasy
is / was all about, and what his corporate
backers are all about.
Thank Jesus.
As promised, here’s the full transcript:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
STEVE ZIMMER:
“This (election) is NOT just about Board District 5.
This is about the ENTIRE CONTROL and FUTURE of LAUSD.
“This is about CONTROL. Make NO mistake about it.
The control of the (LAUSD) school board hangs in the balance.
“And listen … you don’t have to applaud on this line,
but you can.
— (CROWD LAUGHS)
“I have a lot of dear friends in the room,
and sometimes we have disagreed,
and sometimes we look at an issue,
we see it from a different lens,
and sometimes there are painful moments.
“That’s true for me.
That’s been true for Jackie (Goldberg) in her service.
That’s been true for Bennett.
“But the difference between the people
who believe that it’s ALL of us TOGETHER—
—that it’s ALL of us working together,
that… that… that our employees,
that our teachers are our greatest partners.
“NOT our enemies,
NOT … NOT… litigants to be challenged in court,
NOT … NOT…. people to be blamed for
the crisis that is facing our children,
but the VERY PEOPLE who can
lift our children out of this crisis.
“Even if we disagree on some issues,
the difference between
the folks like Bennett Kayser,
the folks like Jackie Goldberg,
Jeff Horton before her…
“ … the folks… the folks who have tried
to fight the fight over the years that
I am proud to associate myself with.
“The difference between THAT and…
“And what the folks who are
trying to destroy Bennett Kayser—
NOT BEAT Bennett Kayser—DESTROY him
AS A PERSON, not just as a political figure, but
DESTROY him as a person.
“The difference between…
we who believe that it’s ALL OF US together.
“and …
“those who believe that it’s ‘us against them’…
“It’s NIGHT and DAY.
“We CANNOT let them
take control of the school board
because if they take control of the school board,
they’ll have control of who becomes the
next Superintendent of this district.
“They’ll have control over the budget.
They’ll have control over the policies.
They‘ll have control over the schools.
“And it took us too long for us to realize it—
Bennett realized it WAY before I did,
and I give him credit for it EVERY day—
“What John Deasy tried to do to this school district.
“He tried to bring public education DOWN.
And the MISIS crisis was NO accident.
That is… that WAS INTENTIONAL, because
if you read their websites,
if you read what they’re trying to do…
“ ‘Stability’ is an ugly word.
“ ‘Disruption’ is what it is about.
“But WE know
WE the teachers
WE the principals
WE the school workers
WE KNOW
WE THE PARENTS
WE KNOW that disruption causes
REAL collateral damage
to REAL children EVERY DAY!
“And Bennett and I have been
about trying to re-STABILIZE and
re-HUMANIZE our schools.
“And at the end of the day,
we are about an ALL-kids agenda—
ALL kids, NOT SOME kids.
“And if you go to a door, and if you’re on a phone.
and people say,
“ ‘Why should I care?‘
“ ‘Why should I vote?’
“PUBLIC education is about
EVERY CHILD that comes to the
schoolhouse door—those who are the most gifted,
and those who have the most DIFFICULT
of challenges that are facing them.
“What makes public education PUBLIC education is
that it’s EVERY child that comes to the schoolhouse door,
and no one, NO ONE—NOT ME, NOT anyone else—
has been a better champion of that than Bennett Kayser.
“That said…
the MOST reprehensible,
the most DISGUSTING thing that they have done
is to somehow challenge—that while
Bennett has struggled, and continues to struggle
valiantly, publicly, VICTORIOUSLY
against Parkinson’s disease,
they have SOMEHOW THOUGHT that it is okay
to suggest… to suggest that somehow,
because of this struggle, he is incapable of serving.
“Every … ANY one of us could go to a neurologist
some time over the next year,
and come out with that diagnosis—ANY ONE of us.
“And thank God we have Bennett Kayser to
show us that this is NOT a death sentence,
that it’s NOT a way of having to fade into
the background,
that you can serve with pride,
with integrity,
with intelligence
with capability.
“And DAMN THEM, DAMN THEM
for questioning that!
Damn them for questioning that!
“Don’t let that win!
“Because I’ve known Bennett for over 20 years,
but in our private conversations…
what he now knows is that there is a new
empathy for what our children with
the most challenges face.
“THERE IS NO ONE MORE APPROPRIATE
to serve on the Board of Education.
than someone who INTIMATELY
and PERSONALLY understands those challenges
because he will NEVER turn way from them.
“So these next three weeks, Bennett…
these next three weeks…
they are about you, but they are also about
the future of public education
in this country, and in this city.
“We will NOT let this stand, Bennett,
and we WILL stand by you.
“But the last thing I want to say, Bennett, is….
“Thank you for your courage, for enduring this
on behalf of all of us, and most especially
on behalf of all the children who need you
the most.
“Thank you, Bennett!”
——————–
Later on, Steve gave an interview about this speech, and he said any attempts to work with Eli Broad and other billionaire privatizers / corporate reformers was futile.
http://laschoolreport.com/zimmer-damns-rodriguez-and-his-supporters-for-attacks-on-kayser/
STEVE ZIMMER: “I come to them with olive branches, and they respond with napalm… their message to me is ‘We hate you! We hate you! WE HATE YOU!”
He accused Eli Broad and other billionaire privatizers / corporate reformers of “crossing new frontiers of depravity” in their attacks on him and Bennett Kayser. “This is the most amoral type of campaigning, using a type of lies and distortion, that lowered the entire moral climate of political discourse.”
LikeLike
Who ever elected Eli Broad to ANYTHING, muchless to the LAUSD BoE? Only a dictator who defiles the populace behaves like this.
LikeLike
Of course the Times would print that…because Eli Broad owns The Times.
LikeLike
I was unable to open the comments on that story. Anybody else have that problem?
LikeLike
I asked the other day which billionaire was backing the new charter high school project.
Now we know.
She hired the exact same people that have been running ed reform in government for 15 years, so I’m not clear why this needs private funding since it will be identical to the Bloomberg/Obama approach which is of course publicly-funded.
Get ready for another slick, professional ed reform marketing campaign run by the same people who revolve in and out of government to foundations and the private sector. Your town or city HERE 🙂
Just curious- how many times does Joel Klein have to fail before people stop hiring him? Hasn’t he ridden this ed reform “movement” long enough?
LikeLike
Also, this organization is promoting the charter high school project- they say they have some kind of “alliance” so people should know that when the former government people arrive in your state or city to market the Job’s charter high schools:
LikeLike
The NYT did an article on Broad’s newest museum and there were multiple Broad-bashing comments throughout the comments section.
Some comments expressed confusion at the haters and were promptly schooled on who the real Broad is.
It may be impossible to stop his destruction, but his legacy and reputation can be destroyed with the truth.
LikeLike
Eli Broad will be remembered for the destruction of public education, not for the monuments he built.
LikeLike