I get excited whenever I see an article in the New York Times that speaks common sense about education. It is a newspaper with national reach. Television producers of news shows always read the Times. I get a sense of hope.
Brittany Bronson, a regular contributor to the Op-Ed page, has an article about the voucher program in Nevada, and she sees how it will work. It won’t help poor kids. It will be used by middle-parents to exit the public schools. It will reduce the diversity in public schools.
Vouchers won’t cure what ails our low-income families. They will only reinforce the assumption that our private schools are successful and public ones are not, that the education system is broken. But it’s not the schools alone that are broken; they are a loose wheel in a system that is malfunctioning on a much grander scale.
In Nevada, about one in four children live in poverty, not because their schools have failed them, but because their parents juggle multiple jobs on a stagnant minimum wage, have little job security and are denied paid time off.
The Anne E. Casey Foundation argues that improving the well-being of children in poverty requires a two-generation approach, meaning you can’t improve the situation for children without addressing the economic realities of their parents. Its 2015 report states that, “Boosting low family income, especially early in a child’s life, can have lasting positive effects on cognitive development, health, and academic achievement.”
These economic challenges present direct conflicts with the type of parental involvement and support that are necessary for quality education. Erratic and unpredictable work hours make it difficult to organize transportation to and from school and after-school child care. Long workdays limit parents’ ability to ensure that children’s academic responsibilities outside of school are being met. Low wages without benefits make it impossible to afford enriching activities outside the classroom or quality health care that plays a crucial role in academic success.
Nevada parents do need choices, but far more than these vouchers can provide.

Rachel Hard to read the font on my phone. Will look at it tomorrow morning in the office. Enjoy this beautiful day Mike
LikeLike
There’s an aspect to vouchers that often gets missed. They really are a way for the wealthier among us to recoup their tax dollars to subsidize their choice to send their children to private schools, rather than (God forbid) those tax dollars go to some poor kids in tough public schools. Even worse, taxpayers could even end up subsidizing such parents choices well beyond the amount they pay in taxes for education. For example, if they have 3 or 4 children attending private school. Vouchers are just one of many ideas the wealthiest among us have come up with, in part because they resent paying taxes and having that money support others.
LikeLike
Ray Mathis: comments like yours are one of the main reasons I visit this blog.
Thank you.
😎
LikeLike
Ditto.
LikeLike
When Governor Cuomo began his attack on public education, this is similar to what I was(am) saying.The achievements and needs of our schools are being discounted and discredited. To really know what is happening in schools, one needs to know what is going on in the community around it. If the politicians would take some time to visit the schools, and speak with the families, they would know what their consituents are up against! To blame the schools for everything bad that is happening, totally leaves whole segments of our population unheard and voiceless AND will not change the schools.
LikeLike
Vouchers and corporate Charters schools are creating a caste system in the United States similar to the one in India where those who lose out become the untouchables who will live in a street-to-prison pipeline.
LikeLike
“Parents who choose private, online or home education over the public system will soon be eligible for vouchers worth about $5,000.”
The “5000” is interesting. That’s the number Michigan used for it’s voucher experiment. The experiment was in the planning stages when it was revealed to the public so they all dropped it, but “5,000” must the number ed reformers have arrived at for educating low and middle income children.
Race to the bottom.
LikeLike
Chiara: good catch!
The rheephormistas loves them some numbers, but only to recycle, massage and torture them so they give the “correct” results.
So let’s do a little Ionesco:
“It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.”
Why $5,000 for “educating low and middle income children”?
Bill Gates sends his two kids to Lakeside School for approx. $30,000 a pop.
From the Gates Foundation website:
“We see equal value in all lives.”
Link: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Who-We-Are
So for the vast majority, aka OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN, their “value” is $5,000@year?
For the children of Bill Gates and his rheephormster peers and enforcers and thought leaders, the “value” of THEIR OWN CHILDREN is $30,000@year?
I know that I am going to get schooled by the rheephormista math whizzes that haunt this blog, but since when does $5,000 = $30,000?
😎
P.S. Or maybe I’m asking the wrong question. Perhaps the operative word is “where” not “when.”
Because on the 10th anniversary of the “best thing” to ever happen to NOLA, numbers & stats will dance to whatever tune the rheephorm bandleaders choose.
LikeLike
“But it’s not the schools alone that are broken; they are a loose wheel in a system that is malfunctioning on a much grander scale.”
And your happy to see that, Diane??
Haven’t read the article yet but that alone tells me what I need to know. Since vouchers have been a desire of the far right the NYTidbits has to be against them. It’s all part of the kabuki theatre of national politics.
Teachers/public schools are either “broken” or a “loose wheel”, you choose, hey why not both!
LikeLike
Of course it’s “your happy” like be happy, ay ay ay! You’re not your
LikeLike
Duane, IF the public school are broken, they were broken intentionally from the TOP, and that rigorous and devious plot started before the fraud-and-flawed of A Nation at Risk Report that came out during President Ray-Gun’s spend-more-than-we-earn administration in 1983.
That report was a declaration of war against the public schools, public school teachers and teachers’ unions and it has all been downhill since.
IF the public schools are broken—and I don’t think they are or ever have been—then it was an intentionally manufactured crises from the beginning and teachers, parents and children are the victims—not the ones who broke the system. The breakers are the RheeFormers.
LikeLike
“Flawed and fraud” of a . . . .
Gonna have to use that one, Lloyd! Maybe something like “Before the flawed and fraud follies of NCLB and its red headed stepson RatTT. . . ”
And you are quite correct with what you say in your post.
LikeLike
Oh, it’s just an “experiment”, Diane! Innovators innovating.
Which in ed reform circles means it will be introduced in every state legislature in the next 12 months, regardless of “results”, and half of them will adopt it.
Does anyone who works for the public put any effort into public schools anymore, or is that now unfashionable? Did we really need a huge group of people on the public payroll who spend all their time promoting private schools?
I just feel sorry for the public school kids in that state. Remarkably, they seem to have ended up with no advocates in government. Maybe they can hire a lobbyist.
LikeLike
Yep. I have the same thoughts and questions.
LikeLike
I feel sorry for all the kids in every state.
LikeLike
The ACLU is suing. Maybe public school parents can start paying the lawyers at the ACLU to advocate on their behalf since the people they’re paying in government can’t be bothered with their public schools.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/08/27/aclu-suing-to-block-nevada-education_ap.html
LikeLike
What is the purpose of this lead in topic sentence of a paragraph?:
“How to get the public system in Nevada properly functioning has produced a frenzied debate for years, but legislation passed this summer significantly, and finally, increased the education budget by some $400 million.”
Did you surmise to get the reader to believe that the legislature has “significantly increased the education budget”? Let’s do some ciphering. 400M divided by 873B (total state budget for education for 2014) equals 4.6% of the budget total increase. Hmmm, is that a “significant” increase?
Ah, but. . .
“There is a catch, though. Part of that budget will go toward one of the most expensive voucher systems ever attempted in the country. Parents who choose private, online or home education over the public system will soon be eligible for vouchers worth about $5,000.
So that 400M increase is even less for the public schools than the first sentence states.
When the NYTidbits of the Oligarchs starts out a sentence with something to the effect of “All of the states we researched significantly underfund public schools. . . ” then they might catch my attention but no sooner.
LikeLike
“873B (total state budget for education for 2014)”
Really? Is there a decimal point missing? Check the figures. Illinois spent 37.2B. The total state budget was ~136B.
LikeLike
Now I’m going to have to go back and look it up. I wonder if that figure included higher ed budget.
LikeLike
Not sure what I did wrong. Figured it again and came up with 19.5B. Anyone from Nevada help me out please!
LikeLike
That sounds more reasonable. The child population of Illinois is more than 4x that of Nevada.
LikeLike
I await the arrival of the commenter who thinks that homeschooling is the answer to everything? How the heck are parents, many of them single, who are working at two or three low wage jobs supposed to home school their kids? At best, only a small fraction of Americans can or even want to home school their kids. This so called home schooling panacea/silver bullet is just so much libertarian glop, nonsense and obfuscation to distract and misdirect from the real issues. One real issue being the privatization and purposeful destruction of our NON FAILING public school system.
LikeLike
NCLB actually had a modified version. The pumped public money into private contractors for “tutoring” low income kids. They ended up with a corrupt mess in Texas that included innovators like “Tutors With Computers”.
It was such a success (for the contractors) that Governor Kasich in Ohio then put a version in, a decade later.
LikeLike
Why must we keeping digging up failed ideas from the past.
The State of Texas passed legislation to make schools display a letter grade while other states are repealing similar legislature.
https://davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/the-scarlet-letter-again/
LikeLike
Here is a link to the AECF 2015 report which I have not yet gone through. http://www.aecf.org/resources/the-2015-kids-count-data-book/
And here is an analysis that explains why vouchers and other forms of choice are incapable of solving the problems they claim to be able to address.
http://horacemannleague.blogspot.com/2013/01/asymmetric-information-parental-choice.html?m=1
LikeLike
The AECF report is a great resource, both on the issues and the parts thereof. It is clear in it’s examination of the underlying causes and also indicates a path forward. It’s broken down state by state as well as by overall trends. Highly recommended as a resource for activism at all levels.
LikeLike
Exactly.
LikeLike
https://www.facebook.com/pages/ESA-Nevada-Super-Voucher/523399194474855
Several lawsuits being discussed to stop this bad boy. You can follow here.
LikeLike
Has anyone noticed that those who blame poverty as the main reason for failing to teach each child always blame the parents — they are “not home to enforce/help with homework” or “they have no books in the home” or “they have no time for the child”.
If you insist that a child must go to a public school then you have the obligation to teach that child — no excuses since you are all making a living in the education establishment.
If you do not want that obligation then let the child go to a school that will teach every child.
There are public schools that teach every child whether the child is poor or homeless — no excuses.
Read “HOW it’s being done — Urgent lessons from unexpected schools” by Karin Chenoweth to get an idea of how to teach every child.
LikeLike
Voucherism -I have long said this- is not based on the desire to achieve school reform or help kids. Voucherism is about the liberarian right of the Republican party to get revenge against teacher’s unions so that unions will be weakened. I know that because I happen to have heard Republican leaders say this in private. There are Republican leaders out there who want to reconstitute public schools. Voucherism is also a money grab of public money by private entrepreneurs who want to make a profit in the short term and have no true civic virtue or care for the future of this country as a unified nation. Without universal k-12 education and public colleges the middle class of America will wither away. When the middle class withers away we will see violence and social problems we have not seen since the Civil War. When that happens the American Dream of democracy will turn into the American Nightmare. Our military are no longer citizen soliders but high paid mercenaries. They are only one step away from becoming a tool for an ambitious dictator. One day the military will realize that they are the true masters of the unarmed public. One day the age of the dictator will be at hand and the elites will demand a dictator to protect their property and lifestyles. When that happens the Constitution and the free society we know and have know will fade into history. Voucherism per se will not solve our problems. It will make societ problems worse. Voucherism will destroy the alread weak and already disrepected teaching profession. Voucherism is tsouras…Trouble with a capital T. I hope not to survive to see such a betrayal of American’s fundamental values and the her foundational value: universal free public educaiton. Any politician -Democrat or Republican- who supports Voucherism supports the undermining of American democracy. They should be denounced. They should be stopped.
LikeLike
This article claims that the ‘liberal’ position– poor & lower-mid can’t afford private on a 5k voucher– is disproved by the numbers
http://www.reviewjournal.com/columns-blogs/glenn-cook/esas-can-cover-private-school-tuition
The numbers don’t add up. To make his point the author lists 3 inner-city Catholic schools whose tuition is covered by the voucher. The rest start at 1k-2k more per year for elementary (more for upper grades). He also notes that there will be about 900 opportunity scholarships available. Meanwhile you’ve got about 350k students in the Clark County district, which overwhelms private seating capacity, opportunity scholarships, & private financial aid budgets out of the gate.
Even if capacity were there, the theory that poor/lower-middle can afford to pony up 1k-2k more per kid for school is a pipe dream. After paying rent on a 1-br, a single mom casino worker has to be very creative just to feed & clothe herself & her kid on what’s left. 2 casino workers with 2 kids in a 2-br rental might be able to swing it for 1 kid but not the other.
While the ACLU case makes its way through the courts, stand by for a rash of lo-cost lo-quality charter start-ups.
LikeLike