Despite the pressure exerted by the U.S. Department of Education and threats to cut off federal funding, the Oregon legislature passed a strong opt out bill, protecting parental rights.
From: Oregon Education Association
Oregon Senate passes HB2655–first step on path to a better way
Senate Passes “Student Assessment Bill of Rights”
Today the Oregon Senate overwhelmingly passed HB 2655 (24-6) — one of the strongest bills in the nation to support all students and parents on statewide standardized assessments. The bill establishes the Student Assessment Bill of Rights which requires assessment transparency by giving students:
the right to know the purpose of statewide assessments and how the results will be used
when exactly the assessments will be administered
the amount of class time required for the assessment
the learning targets that make up the assessment
how students can self-assess and track their own progress
when the results will be made available
and who will have access to the student’s testing data and how the data will be used
HB 2655 also establishes one of the most parent friendly opt-out provisions in the nation by ensuring that every parent has easy access to information about statewide assessments and how to exercise their right to determine if sitting for the statewide standardized assessment is in the best interest of their child.
More importantly, the legislation brings us one step closer to our ultimate goal–a system where parents, students and teachers are “all-in” instead of wanting to “opt-out.” We have already been working with educators and education leaders across the state to begin to map out a better path for student assessments that focuses on inspiring a love of learning. To learn more about how you can get involved, click here.
This is a huge victory for students and parents, and we’re proud of all the work you did to pass HB 2655 –this bill would not have become law without your commitment to improving public education in Oregon.

Is Oregon hiring teachers?
LikeLike
My district is:
https://salemkeizer.tedk12.com/hire/index.aspx
LikeLike
OMG, it’s like the Prague spring.
LikeLike
Praise God! VICTORY!!!!!!! Let every state follow their lead!
LikeLike
Thank goodness for the sensible folks in Oregon. There is some hope for a return to sanity!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Exceptional Delaware and commented:
Go Oregon! You make us proud. I am hoping Delaware will be able to say the same in the next 19 days. We are waiting for a full Senate vote.
LikeLike
Hope for public education picks up strength along the Oregon Trail…may it pread throughout our great nation.
The light still flickers in spite of corrupt billionaires buying American politicians left and right. It flickers because of our students, and our way of life.
While we continue to see the worst of those who would do our nation great harm by destroying our public education and the dreams of our nations’ youth, we also continue to see the very best from patriots across our land.
While the billionaires and their bought politicians wield both money and power…we have an even greater resource…
…our people.
LikeLike
The bill has not quite been made into law yet. It needs one more trip through the House (hopefully perfunctory) and then must be signed by the governor. I don’t anticipate anything stopping it, but I am holding back on FULL celebration mode. 🙂
LikeLike
Thou shalt not hold back, Kathleen.
Celebrate today. Celebrate tomorrow.
LikeLike
Hallelujah!
How absolutely wonderful!
Thank You Oregon!
There is still decency and HOPE in America.
LikeLike
I’m really proud of our Senate for passing this (24-6). Now, it will go back to the House. If they approve the amendments, it’s on to the Governor.
I am a special education teacher, K-5. This test has absolutely no benefit to any of my students. We already know how they are performing. We provide special education services to help them build the skills they need to be successful in school. This test conflicts with these services. So, although they will derive no benefit from taking it, they are removed from the specially designed instruction we deliver in order to comply. I have some students who missed out on four weeks of instruction. This is a travesty.
As I gave this test, I wondered if the designers had ever met a child before. I can guarantee you that the test is not valid for at least 90% of my students. For a few, their emotional/ mental health issues prevented them from answering questions they did not know and moving on. My students took the test seriously. Some were in fear that failing it would prevent them from advancing to the next grade. This was heartbreaking to see.
In my opinion, IEP teams need to have absolute power over what, if any, assessments need to be given to students with disabilities. The purpose of testing is accurate measurement of a skill or ability, in order to provide the teacher or team direction on how to educate the student. The most valid testing done in school is the day to day questions the teacher asks in class, because the answers drive instruction. If testing has no diagnostic value, it has no benefit to the student.
We can’t do this again next year. I am prepared to let the parents of all of my students know that they have the right to opt their children out of this test.
I am also concerned about the psycho/social aspects of engaging in this exercise. Fundamentally, students learn and follow directions because they trust us as teachers. If we use them in this manner, doing the opposite of what we’re trained to do as teachers, what will the impact be on the teacher/student relationship? Once trust is violated, can it truly be regained?
More here:
http://registerguard.com/rg/news/local/33186093-75/oregon-senate-moves-to-make-it-easier-for-parents-to-opt-their-kids-out-of-smarter-balanced-tests.html.csp
LikeLike
The bottom line is that you know far better what is best for your students than the DOE does…but they are desperate to test all — or as many as possible — student to prevent any “loopholes.” Similarly, they are desperate to prevent any — or as many as possible — state from giving power to the parents to avoid the tests so that other states can’t see how much better life is when there is choice to get away from the shortsightedness of these tests.
Great job, Oregon! Finish this!
LikeLike
Thank you for writing. I have a son in Oregon schools on an IEP (he’ll be going into 9th grade…yikes). It’s absurd what the “we get to define normal” educational bureaucracies impose on our students and on their teachers.
LikeLike
In response to you question, “I wonder if the designers have ever met a child…”. I will tell you that those who wrote the test either , don’t have children, have children who are too young to participate in the test, or have grown children who will never have to take the test. They are exempt from the horrible consequences of their actions. They are primarily white privileged men. Not representational of our country at all.
LikeLike
Or their children attend private school.
LikeLike
Hi Tim, another Oregon teacher and parent here. Keep an eye out because groups like Stand for Children are pressing Governor Brown to veto this legislation. I wrote a letter to the Register Guard in response to an editorial calling for a veto:
http://registerguard.com/rg/opinion/33189378-78/kill-testing-opt-out-bill.html.csp
I also commented on this. Also, I had a long email conversation with Dev Sinha, a Unversity of Oregon math professor and major proponent of Common Core in Oregon. My take away is that many of the academics supporting Common Core have a flawed misunderstanding of standards and how they are applied at the K-12 level. In fact, much of the work by William Schmidt of Michigan State is based on this flawed assumption. I was opposed to SBAC before, but just luke warm about CCSS. Having done more research, I see know that they are an integrated package designed to end local and state control of education. There is no evidence that standards impact learning (see my blog post on this:
http://optouteugene.blogspot.com/2015/06/why-do-we-need-new-standards.html
There’s more. I started to research the foundational studies underlying the Base-10 math found in k-4 standards. It’s interesting and can see the point. However, the critique of the US math system’s traditional algorithms is really English-language related. For example, Base-10 says to treat 11 as 10-1, 12 as 10-2… This is related to the fact that in many Asian languages (like Korean), 11 is literally 10-1, 12 is literally 10-2, etc. So adopting Base 10 now causes two steps here, first is learning 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, etc, then relating that to 11, 12, 13, etc. For some kids, I can see this being a problem. I also think that the studies in the States on this were done in Montesorri schools, but I haven’t read all the studies yet. This is all based on the work of Fuson, going back to the 1990s. I do not think the case has been adequately made that the tradition methods of teaching and learning multi-digit addition and subtraction were flawed to the point that they caused serious learning delays.
I guess that is enough.
LikeLike
We all remember the BRAVE lone student standing in front of a giant tank in Tiananmen Square – 1989.
Oregon is doing the Right Thing for children, parents, teachers and our country.
Stand STRONG!
LikeLike
Posted on the Seattle Opt Out Group fb page. We are so excited to have this happen in our neighboring state! yay!
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Seattle-Opt-Out/430265387124998?ref=hl
LikeLike
It’s fascinating to see the process- who gets it and who doesn’t.
Start at 31:40.
http://oregon.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=6&clip_id=9979
LikeLike
Oregon has responded to big bad government meddling in the lives of every day people.
It’s too bad, because I believe in very big government and collectivism.
But big government, which is probably an American term (perhaps not?) is only good when it serves the people instead of oppressing them or attacking them, in which case, I declare to big government, “Get out of my way, and don’t tread on me!”
I don’t mean this in the GOP way; I have never voted for the GOP and probably never will, although the democratic party is just as rotten, save for Bernie Sanders and a few others.
We ARE the government, and the government is us. When that paradigm no longer exists or breathes a shallow, nominal breath and renders the scene “us and them”, then all I can say is don’t tread on me and don’t underestimate the actionable consequences of human suffering . . .
I am weary of hearing people point fingers at Obama and his wife. They are but siblings of a very large family of bastards up on Capitol Hill who want this reform and who have inbred their politics.
They won’t win in the long run, but we are in for a very long, protracted, and intense fight. They will win many battles, maybe even the majority of them.
But we will win the war.
LikeLike
Cx:
I am weary of seeing people point fingers at Obama . . . .
LikeLike
Way to go, Oregon Senators! I truly hope that this bill becomes law and that other states notice and follow suit. This gives me hope.
LikeLike
Utah’s law is not quite as expansive, but it is similar. Parents are supposed to know about their rights to opt out, but teachers can’t tell parents. So, districts do it. My district did it by sending it in an e-newsletter format that they use now for all of those ads, which means that nobody actually looked at it.
LikeLike
Having lived there, I am well aware that the cognitive dissonance is very strong in Utah: “no federal control” vs “total federal control”.
I feel your pain and frustration.
LikeLike
Hey, a fellow Utahn! I KNEW I liked you, SDP!!!! (Your poems are AMAZING, by the way)
LikeLike
I lived (and actually taught) in Utah long long ago but things don’t ever seem to change. 🙂
Thanks for the note of confidence.
I like to see myself as merely a channeler of all the great things that people like yourself write on this blog — as “SomeDAM Sousatzka”, the Shirley MacLaine of Diane Ravitch’s blog.
I finished compiling my channelings in “A DAMthology of Deform”, by the way.
You can download them by clicking here (“blogspot” is a site sponsored by google so there’s no risk in clicking on that — none that I am aware of, anyway)
LikeLike
In Illinois–KEEP calling & e-mailing Sen. John Cullerton–HB 306 (Parent Opt Out Bill) sits in Senate Committee.
LikeLike
Beyond impressive
LikeLike
“The Oregon Trail”
Our cup is raised
To Oregon
The trail is blazed
“Reform be gone!”
LikeLike
PS I know it’s pronounced Oreg”in”, but that’s why I have a poetic license (counterfeited on my home printer, but so what?)
LikeLike
Yong Zhao testified in front of the state education committee earlier this spring. It sounds like he got through to lawmakers. Very encouraging!
From The Oregonian:
Assistant U.S. Secretary of Education Deborah Delisle, in an email to Oregon schools chief Rob Saxton, characterized the Oregon bill as one of the most extreme opt-out measures in the country. She characterized the bill as “proactively encouraging parents to opt students out of assessments and failing to hold districts and schools accountable.”
But Oregon lawmakers heaped scorn on the tests themselves and on the need to test all students. Parent choice, not federal dictates, should govern whether students take the tests, they said.
Love the part about heaping scorn on these tests. Oregon finally gets it right!
LikeLike
I am awaiting the push back from the yahoos. Hope I am wrong.
LikeLike
Wonderful News! Oregon is the most progressive state in the West. Does CA need to import some of these folks so we can get this here too?
LikeLike