Writing in the Houston Chronicle, Chris Ladd describes a voucher proposal that just passed the State Senate as the most sweeping privatization plan in the nation. He calls it “neo-Confederate.” It is a stunning editorial that should be read by everyone who thinks that public education is a public responsibility and that public money should not be funneled to religious institutions. Hopefully, good common sense will prevail in the state House, but one never knows.
Ladd writes:
Texas’ legislature is poised to deliver a massive gift to the state’s religious fundamentalists. The Senate has passed the boldest school privatization program in the country, a pilot program that would finally neuter the “godless” public schools. This is what happens when you place a mildly deranged radio host in a state’s most powerful elected office.
Sending public school students to private religious schools may not seem like a ticket to a well-educated citizenry prepared for 21st century demands. That’s ok. Those are not the goals of this program. Legislators are looking for ways to further cut taxes and rescue Texas children from the godless influence of science, history, and empirical knowledge.
There’s nothing particularly revolutionary about school vouchers. Thirteen states plus DC already have programs that let students attend private institutions with public funding under some limited circumstances. What makes Texas’ proposal special is its ambitious scope and its potential to remove the last major edifice of public capital in Texas…..
So, let’s review. Texas’ proposed school reform would, at least on a limited scale for now, allow taxpayers to opt out of paying taxes to public schools in order to direct their contributions to EAO’s. Those entities would decide which students to fund in private schools, with no constraints on sending students to religious academies and no oversight on which students they fund.
If expanded, this offers Texas’ religious fundamentalists a huge achievement. They could finally destroy their most hated public institution – the schools. This proposal would gradually starve the public schools of their revenue stream, further cutting the amount that the state pays after years of careful under-funding. Meanwhile it would leave the public schools trapped under their existing infrastructure and mandates, a trap that would finally finish off the beast.
Undersized vouchers would fail to deliver enough funding to support a competent private education. Affluent families would get to take the money and run, receiving a state subsidy which they could combine with their family’s own contributions to pay for a reasonably good private education. Middle income families who can’t afford to pay above the voucher value would be left in the lurch, trapped between a collapsing public school system and a collection of cheap, storefront Christian madrassas.
A new generation of young people will be spared from learning about their history or discovering anything about the natural world that might challenge their religious assumptions. They’ll be ignorant, bigoted, and reliably pious, which this legislature will see as a big fat win.
The roots of this concept are perhaps even worse than the shape of the plan itself. In response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down racial discrimination in schools, Georgia passed a constitutional amendment in 1954 allowing their legislature to privatize the entire school system. They never took that radical step, but the law remained in place until Georgia introduced a new constitution in 1982.
One of the architects of Texas’ current plan is Arthur Laffer, a man who has manufactured a successful career out of being wrong about everything. He became famous for formulating what George Bush, Sr. famously called “voodoo economics.” Laffer most recently used his policy voodoo to rip the bottom out of Kansas’ state finances. People are still listening to this guy because results don’t matter in politics.
It isn’t clear whether the current proposals can gain enough support to pass in this session. The Senate has already approved the plan, but its future in the House is uncertain.
What is clear is that Texas’ experiment with radical Neo-Confederate government is reaching a crucially painful stage and there is no relief in sight. This disastrous and bizarre proposal may fail this year, but there is nothing to stop it from emerging again and again until it, something even worse, finally passes. Elections have consequences and there are no signs of Texas elections delivering sanity any time soon.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
Maybe it really is time to send in the National Guard …
LikeLike
Good job ed reformers. That’s what happens when you spend 2 decades redefining “public” to mean “publicly-funded”.
Vouchers were inevitable. The Agnostics were going to get rolled.
In an ed reform “debate” that consists of passionate supporters of privatization on one side and potted-plant “agnostics” and “relinquishers” on the other, this result was simply a matter of time.
LikeLike
They are approaching the threshold, more like the cliff, that I have been predicting for several years now. What they have not yet tumbled to is the “undiscovered country” that waits on the other side of it.
When education is regarded as a purely private benefit, in large part a mere extension of Sunday School, then there will be no reason anymore for anyone to pay for anyone else’s education.
There will come a taxpayer revolt like none we have ever seen before.
LikeLike
Hopefully, good common sense will prevail in the state House, but one never knows.
Seems to be in short supply. This initiative will be adored by all too many. It will embolden others.
LikeLike
How is Arthur Laffer given any credibility at all these days?
LikeLike
I don’t know. They never go away. Once they’re in the “expert club” their membership is never revoked.
It’s a job for life.
I’m not surprised he’s behind Kansas destroying their own public education system. 150 years to build, 5 years to destroy.. What a shame. All those generations of investment in building something, just gone.
LikeLike
This will tell what TX is all about.
LikeLike
Silly me. I thought that money to religious institutions was unconstitutional. separation of church and state kind of thing.
Funny thing, what gets overlooked when money is the bottom line.
LikeLike
http://careereducator.blogspot.com/2015/05/school-vouchers-are-not-so-much-about.html
LikeLike
I’d better not share this article in case it reaches Spanish neocon govt., although it’s already treading on the same path. Keep an eye on Ms Gomendio, recently appointed OECD Education Deputy Director. She, together with her husband and Education Minister, Mr Wert, are responsible for dismantling public education in Spain.
LikeLike
If these people can tell if a classroom is godless, than that means they must be able see or at least sense God in a room. Does He speak to them and not me? What does He tell them? Because I do not have that superpower, does that mean God has abandoned me and everybody else who does not have a direct channel? Is enough to believe and follow, or do you have to say you believe to be a follower? And to whom?
LikeLike
What’s actually “neo-confederate” is the opposition to vouchers. It was the KKK and its admirers, after all, who opposed state aid to private schools (run by the much-hated Catholics) in the 19th century, and who got provisions added to state constitutions that would serve in the anti-Catholic anti-voucher cause. Historians know these as Blaine Amendments.
LikeLike
WT,
The battle cry of segregationists after the Brown decision of 1954 was “school choice.” I am old enough to remember that. Maybe you are not.
LikeLike
“Meanwhile it would leave the public schools trapped under their existing infrastructure and mandates, a trap that would finally finish off the beast.” Hooray! Then maybe true educational reform/revolution will be forced to happen; nothing else has.
LikeLike
I agree with most of what Ladd says; I support public schools and the separation of church and state. He is afraid that “legislators are looking for ways to… rescue Texas children from the godless influence of science, history, and empirical knowledge.” Unfortunately, that has been the effect of CCSS as well. We don’t have time for any of the “frills” such as science and social studies. If there is P.E., art, or music, it is part of the schedule so that teachers can analyze their data to determine why they and their students are such failures and discuss implementation of the Common Core and the latest administrative directives. If it is not on the test, we are not allowed to teach it. Seems like flip sides of the same coin to me.
LikeLike