Peter Greene was not happy with Nicholas Kristof’s column saying that–after twelve years of trying–school reform hasn’t worked out and it was time to pay attention to the youngest children, where research was clear and there was bipartisan agreement.
Here is a snippet of Greene’s outrage:
“Look, I believe there are a handful of reformsters who know better, and I’m sure plenty of them mean well. But this is just too much. I’m pretty sure that I read Kristof more often than he reads me. But I have a message for him anyway.
“Dear Mr. Kristof:
“Does a decade seem like a long time to work at education? Does working at education seem hard? While we’re at it, have you noticed that water is wet?
“This– this “well this has been difficult, it’s time to move on”– THIS is why from the first moment reformsters showed up on the scene, teachers across America rolled our eyes, squared our shoulders, and turned away. Because we knew that the day would come when the tourists decided they wanted to pack up and leave. Because you were not in it to get the job done.
“Reformsters were never the white knights or the saviors of education. The vast majority of reformsters were the people who swept into a home, pulled all the furniture out from the wall, burned the drapes (because you don’t want these old things) and started to tear the floor up. Then somewhere around day three, you declare, “Man this is hard, and this couch doesn’t fit against that wall (which we had told you all along)” and so you pack up, drive away, and leave the residents to put things back together.
“You think twelve years was a long time? I’ve been at this for thirty-six, and I have plenty more to go because there’s still work to do, and as long as I can do it, I will. Plenty of my colleagues have done and will do the same. You think educating in the face of poverty and lack of resources and systemic inequity is difficult? Many of my colleagues have been doing it for decades. But reformsters have been so sure that they didn’t need to listen to the locals. They and their giant balls knew better than any stupid teachers.
“Doing the education thing takes a lifetime. In fact, it takes more than a lifetime– that’s why we’ve constructed an institution that provides continuity above and beyond what we could get from any single human being.
“You think that the education thing is hard, “a slog,” after just a decade! You amateur. You dabbler! You tourist! Has the education reform movement “peaked”? Well, guess what! Education has not. We are still working at it, still striving, still doing our damnedest. When reformsters have moved on because it’s hard and challenging and a slog and not just as fun as it was a whole ten years ago, we will still be here, doing the job, educating students and doing it all in the midst of the mess created by a bunch of wealthy well-connected hubristic tourists with gigantic balls.
“You think education is hard? What the hell do you think dedicated teachers across this country are doing with their entire adult lives?!!
“So get out. Go. Move on to the next big opportunity and screw around with that until you’re all distracted by the next shiny object. Education is not the better for your passing through.
“Education needs people who will commit, people who are in it for the marathon, not the sprint, people who are willing to dedicate their whole lives to teaching because that’s the minimum that it takes. Students and communities need schools that are permanent stable fixtures, not temporary structures built to long as a reformster’s attention span.”
Outstanding post by Peter Greene.
Well said!
You betcha!
Dear Susan:
I guess that you did not attend NPE conference in Chicago this week-end, am I correct?
I hope that you are well. Love. May
I was just looking at the New York Times a few minutes ago including its listing today of all the Pulitzer prizes it’s accumulated over the years. Other than a 1944 award for “a survey of the teaching of American history”, I don’t see any other prizes given to the Times for reporting that focused on education. Maybe I missed one? The list goes back almost 100 years. There’s a lot of Pulitzers for foreign reporting, even music and sports.
I think Kristof and company at the Times pay a lot of lip service to improving public education but let’s face it, schools, teachers and students are just not a priority there. In that way, they mirror the dilettante mentality of some of Teach for American’s drive by educators…the reformista class. The really don’t have the patience to do the tough work that teaching really requires…or even reporting on teaching requires.
Are you suggesting they don’t have the, uhh, shall we say…”grit” to finish the job?
Grit = cojones??
“dilettante mentality of some TFA” and, social climbing of others.
Peter — Thank you for giving us the language to replace *&)#$Y(*$&(@&*$&, which is the sound of steam coming out of ears.
You nailed Kristof, along with Duncan, Cuomo, Tisch and the cowardly political class. People like Kristof gave “cover” to politicos who supported charlatans like Eva (e.g., otherwise good guys like Hakim Jeffries). Now is the time to call them out, by name, one by one — all of the politicos who think they were being “forward thinking” by adopting the reformista agenda. Let’s tag them all with their role in leaving public education in tatters for us less enlightened folks to pick up the trash and reassemble the pieces of public education. .
Pair this posting with another from today, this blog, “Dallas: What in the Sam Hill is Going on in Dallas?”
One of the fundamental characteristics of the heavyweights and trendsetters among the reformers, led by the charterites, is the theory and practice of attacking problems with spaghetti.
¿?
Just throw a plateful of spaghetti at a wall and see what sticks. So typically there’s a lot of sound and fury and frenetic motion—then declare the resulting mess somebody else’s problem to clean up and move on to the next opportunity that offers a greater return of $tudent $ucce$$. *John Deasy is an exemplar of the preceding.*
And where do they NOT stick with this particular OP? No excuses. Creaming and skimming. After screening, counsel out [and those pesky monetary fines don’t hurt either!], followed by the creatively innovative midyear dump so public schools are stuck with the ‘test suppressors’ and behavior problems [aka most expensive and difficult to teach]. Gaming the numbers & stats. Multimillion dollar fundraisers so top management is well rewarded for guaranteeing $tudent $ucce$$.
What is the common denominator? The convenience and benefit that accrues to adults, the greatest rewards going to a few of them. And the burdens and lost opportunities go to—
The vast majority of public school staffs, students, parents and communities.
And in any case, twelve years already exceeds Bill Gates’ statement that it will take 10 years to see if rheephorm ‘stuff’ works.
Time’s up. Time to get back to genuine teaching and learning.
A Lakeside School education for all. No excuses. Whatever it takes. And that means no more shopping for world-class educational opportunities at the Rheephorm 99¢ Store.
😎
Kristof is a high profile journalist. While he may not be the most informed on privatization, he is at least taking a step in the right direction. He may be “late to the party,”he is at least amenable to widening the scope of his views. He would perhaps benefit from information more than a smack down.
Great letter by Peter.
Too bad the reformsters and their backers can’t be held criminally liable for the debacle they’ve created in public education.
“The vast majority of reformsters were the people who swept into a home, pulled all the furniture out from the wall, burned the drapes (because you don’t want these old things) and started to tear the floor up. Then somewhere around day three, you declare, “Man this is hard, and this couch doesn’t fit against that wall (which we had told you all along)” and so you pack up, drive away, and leave the residents to put things back together.”
Gotta love that.
BEAUTIFUL!!! Would that those who the remarks are aimed at would take cognizance of this. —- Before it may be too late. How much damage to how many children have already suffered from this nonsense, let alone the great teachers who have given up in disgust.
The problem with Kristoff’s observations are the same as the problem with every outsider’s observations – and by outsider, I mean everyone who is either NOT an educator or NOT a “reformer.” These outsiders have an incredibly shallow understanding of where we are and how we arrived here.
There NEVER was a golden age of public education in this country – as a nation, we have always had reservations about educating the masses. We have ALWAYS tried to educate the masses on the cheap. We have never asked. “What’s the best way to educate our young;” instead we have only asked “What’s the most cost effective way?” So to imply that public education is “broken” is to ignore that, again, as a nation, we’ve never tried to do what is best.
I am not at all saying that the vast majority of teachers haven’t tried to do what’s best. They have, but they’ve had to make these efforts under far less than ideal circumstances.
Kristoff also implies that “reformers” include “idealists.” and that reformers have the best of intentions for our children. There may, indeed, be a few idealists among the current crop of reformers. But until someone shows me evidence to the contrary, I will believe that most reformers are motivated by one of two desires: either to make money, or to save money. What most reformers are doing is immoral.
Well said.
A terrific, inspired rebuttal to Kristof’s poor excuse for an op Ed piece. No doubt, Kristof will not give a tinker’s damn, but Greene has taken in Kristof and that is a fine act of resistance. I have posted Greene’s article on my Face Book page as part of my ongoibg attempts to educate my friends about the crisis in public education provoked by the pseudo reformers,
When Kristof says, “Education inequity is America’s original sin. A majority of American children in public schools are eligible for free or reduced price lunches, and they often get second-rate teachers in second-rate schools — even as privileged kids get superb teachers. This perpetuates class and racial inequity and arises in part from a failed system of local school financing.”
Equitable school financing? Good point.
Extra financing for FRL? Good point
What does he propose?
Not to mention that it’s much easier to be a “superb” teacher in a well-funded district.
Peter ~ Always timely, and right on target!
I have been in it for a lifetime & plan on it for my afterlife.
That’ll p**s off some of the Deformsters.
We have staying power, that’s why we have been such a pain to these here-today-gone-tomorrow halfwits who need for us to jump over the cliff like lemmings. We had tougher kids in our classes who years later told us that we were their favorite teacher. Don’t laugh, happened several times. We have big low hanging dragging you-know-what’s and we know it. Job requirement for lifers. Proud of it!
And the pendulum swings…only this time it has left a deep gouge in the fabric of public education. They will leave…there will be a new shiny object…then real educators will have to pick the pieces. Shouldn’t be this way!
EXCELLENT! TY for posting this, Diane.
Does this mean they’ve moved on from Common Core already? The kids are not even done with the first test!
The Common Core marketing campaign lasted longer than the ed reform “commitment” to the Common Core. So all we’re left with is the tests?
I assume he means the Reformers giant crystal balls?
Bravo.
“Schlock and Awe”
School reform is like Iraq
You trash the place, then flee
And never, ever do look back
At claims of WMD
The “duh” factor.
Teachers, do your damnedest to be heard.
Keep on, Greene. You’re great.
Chris Hedges, The Death of the Liberal Class, is what I see. Too many who have some good intentions, but are focused on themselves.
And that includes teachers who buy into the “I’ll work hard, endlessly, for nothing, in a crazy system, and never speak up about it, because I like to think of myself as a saint” crowd. That doesn’t help, either. Teachers need a lot more control over what is happening.
“And that includes teachers who buy into the “I’ll work hard, endlessly, for nothing, in a crazy system, and never speak up about it, because I like to think of myself as a saint” crowd. That doesn’t help, either.”
YEP, GAGAers get under my skin also.
The NY Times is a paper for Manhattan’s upper class, perhaps with few people in Brooklyn. It isn’t the paper for poor people who send their children to school in NYC. It is wonderful in covering its small universe but otherwise it fails. I spent most of my life in NJ and believe me, the NY Times needs a gps to find NJ. It probably hires a team of guides to find Queens.
Kristof and the other so-called reformers he has shilled for are all of the things – amateurs, dabblers, tourists – he described, plus at least one other: colonizers.
Are you saying Kristof is a columnizer for colonizers?
I feel a poem coming on.
Yes, Jitu Brown nailed that one in the opening plenary session at #NPE2015
You can see his speech here at:http://www.networkforpubliceducation.org
Anthony Cody kicks off at about 12:30, introducing the AMAZING Tanaisa Brown of the Newark Students Union, followed by Jitu Brown.
Kristoff’s column may be a way station on the path to the next target. In a diversionary tactic, pre-school is identified but, a reformer described that sector with a term used in marketing, “low hanging fruit”, which means there is slight profit potential.
The new attack front is dual-pronged, it is the “dampening of innovation by religiosity” and the failure of university professors to innovate.
A confluence appeared recently. Controversial free market economist Steven Levitt, graduate of Koch alma mater, MIT, had a Freakonomics blog post titled, “Religiosity……Bad for Innovation”. Ohio Koch Governor, Kasich said, “You can’t commercialize most of the products out of our universities, in most places in the country. Why? Because there’s no culture of on innovation…. Tenure is a disincentive to innovation”. Then on Sunday, a Chamber of Commerce headline in newspapers invoked “innovation and commercialization.”
IMO, we’re witnessing the origin of myth building.
I think you are right.
Nicholas Kristof, after all, is the same fellow who tried to shift the blame for the debacle in Iraq to the Iraqi prime minister, which was particularly incredible since we were the ones who installed Malaki in the first place.
And Steven Levitt is the fellow who got taken to the cleaners over junk claims he made about climate change and climate science in his second Freakonomics book.
All people need to do is a brief internet search on these folks to figure out how “credible” they are (Not!)
I just read an article about a bill in Iowa that would require that professors’ jobs be determined 100% from student evaluations. Universities do seem like a likely next target.
Poet,
Do you think the Catholic University of America sees the irony in taking a $3,000,000 pledge from the Kochs, whille free market “researchers” write, “Religiosity ….Bad for Innovation”?
The faces of the reformers changed. Educators were reforming education, writing coherent standards and creating materials to meet the challenges that the future citizens would face when so-called “reformers” who were privateers and interested in destroying education for all, entered the forum and subverted the process. With loads of money, political clout, and no education background, these new reformers sought to increase testing, creating faulty evaluation instruments for teachers, sneaky policies to reduce the effects of the teachers’ unions, privatized educational companies advocating for charters and vouchers to convert public funds into private, for-profit schools, etc. The reformers that are talking now are not people who truly care about the mission of education. I left the profession because these people are heartless! The syphoning of public funds from needy schools is despicable.
Kristoff’s next column about education will probably include a clearer statement that education reform has been effective and a good thing, to correct the misunderstanding of his views in his last column.
Mr. Fiorello below repeats the words
” amateurs, dabblers, tourists ” below. I would add “defilers”. Wouldn’t hurt to check out a thesaurus for some words with even darker connotations.
This article is a long-overdue slapdown for these reformistas. Well-done, Mr. Greene!
I was quite disappointed in Kristof’s article in the NYT on 4/27/15. Second rate teachers for second rate schools. Really? I turned down a position at a well-known high school in a highly desirable suburb of Detroit. Why you may ask? Because my students call me Superhero and they tell me I solve problems. Because my students tell me they wish I was their mom and call me that on a regular basis. Because I have gotten hundreds of students into higher education, including one student who received the Gates Scholarship. Because I love urban education. Because once upon a time, I was one of those students–at risk–my home life riddled with every problem imaginable. I’m proud to work in Detroit and I’ proud to serve Detroit PUBLIC School students.