Gene V. Glass posted the following words by David Berliner on his blog, Education in Two Worlds:
When a profession as large and necessary to society as teaching is insulted by state and federal Secretaries of Education, judged negatively by the nation’s presidents and governors, see their pensions cut, receive salaries that do not keep up with inflation, often cannot afford to live in the communities they work in, cannot always practice their profession in ways that are ethical and efficacious, are asked to support policies that may do harm to children, are judged by student test scores that are insensitive to instruction and more often reflect social class differences rather than instructional quality, see public monies used to support discriminatory charter and private schools, yet still have a great deal of support from the parents of the children they teach, then there is a strategy for making teachers’ lives better. It is called unionization. The reasons for unionization could not be plainer. New and veteran teachers should band together and close down school systems of the type I have described. It will be difficult, of course, and some teachers will no doubt be fired and jailed. But if teachers do not fix this once noble profession, America may well lose its soul, as well as its edge.

Diane, my daughter, who graduated from her high school on the honor roll and is currently a freshman dual majoring in English and education, on the Dean’s List at her university, called me angry and frustrated the other night. They have cut the English department so much that there are barely any sections of the classes she needs to take – which means her schedule is totally messed up in order to try and fit them in, and if she gets shut out of any of the classes, it may jeopardize her ability to graduate in four years. This is a young woman who is going into teaching as a calling, is bright, loves working with kids, interned at an elementary school and a Family Centers. Meanwhile, she tells me, her friends in the STEM subjects can’t understand why she’s complaining, because they have unlimited course sections to choose from.
So what’s going to happen when we can’t get enough ELA teachers? Oh right, we’ll fill them with TFA. I get it. We create the shortage and then “magically” have the “solution” to fill the demand.
LikeLike
Outrageous, Sarah! Write about it.
LikeLike
I will, Diane, if my daughter gives me permission. I made a pact with my kids many years back that if I used them in a political column I had to get their permission first. It’s allowed them their privacy and saved a lot of family arguments : )
LikeLike
Berliner says it all! Now teachers must take his advise
LikeLike
Sarah — interview CT State School students and see just how many students have been shut out of classes by these school’s inability to offer enough sessions (be it each semester OR enough per ) of a class in order to stick to a four year schedule.
The increase in number of students attending State schools in recent years coupled with the cutbacks in staff have negatively impacted even the best and brightest ability to graduate on time at these schools.
Grad rates would of course be affected!
Imagine the toll taken on those struggling to pay bills – another semester OR TWO will make it impossible to continue.
Resulting rates certainly favor the reformers case.. Yet closer examination would offer up much more at play (or is it ploy) here.
LikeLike
“America will lose its soul” I wish people could understand education in this way. I completely agree that veteran and experienced teachers need to come together, they can learn from one another and their on the same side. I think the real issue lies in the fact our country does not value education. If we did value education than teachers would get paid real salaries and would be respected.
LikeLike
Yes, this long undermining of public education is a shameful “manufactured crisis” as David Berliner would say. A strike is more than justified, more than overdue–a strike of in the public interests of parents, teachers and administrators too disgusted to put up with these depredations another day–together refusing the tests and the abuse of our children and the looting of our district budgets by commercial parasites, arrogant officials, and privatized charters. These are our schools the govt. and billionaires are dismantling–our kids they are mistreating–our educators’ devotion to teaching where you cannot get rich or famous but you can do some worthy service each day you hold class.
Teacher unions should have built towards this strike years ago, preparing their resources, strategies, tactics, allies, and memberships for a long unavoidable battle to save public education, kids’ learning, and teachers’ rights to professional practice. The 2 teacher unions evaded this necessary road to defend their memberships, their worksites, and the public sector. Building capacity for a strike requires brave and bold leadership and membership as well as lead time for the marshaling of tools to win–the teacher union leaders are not brave, bold or fit to lead. Wherever rank-and-file leaders and members can strike against the private war on public schooling and the officials who work for billionaires, those local leaders and teachers group should take the lead, show the way, initiate strikes from the bottom up, don’t wait for the top-down union machines.
David Berliner has been right for several decades–the disgraceful contempt and buckets of lies thrown at public schools and teachers has moved into its final assault on our public rights and our hopes for a civilized democracy in this nation.
LikeLike
As the PR machine ratchets up pressure for unionization, in discount retail and fast food sectors, unions for middle class professions, K-12 teachers and college faculty, can’t find a defender. Democrats for Education Reform and Democrats for Public Education aren’t checking their rolodexes to help out.
The Ohio chapter of the American Association of University Professors reported Ohio House Bill 64 is up for a vote, today, in the Finance Committee. Language in the bill changes professors to “managers”, which would deny them rights in the collective bargaining contract.
Is the next move, teachers, reclassified as managers, for the purpose of labor laws?
If Bernie Sanders doesn’t run, he’ll be my write-in candidate.
LikeLike
AAUP, Ohio Chapter, just reported the “manager” language was taken out of the bill.
Ohio’s Attorney General doesn’t appear to mind legal battles that are likely to fail but, one can hope the Finance Committee was motivated to take away his opportunity to try to defend professors’ jobs as managerial.
LikeLike
Accurate in every respect, but not quite complete. The demolition derby is intended, in part, to make “person and place-based” education unnecessary (or much less necessary) through the wonders of technology, with adaptive testing built into courseware, and so-called personalized learning at any time, any where you can connect. By-pass all of those troublesome teachers and their unions, and the upkeep of so many schools.
According to futurists, the remainders of teacher and place-based education will be most evident in communities where parents depend on schools for a care-giving function and communal activities, especially those requiring athletic and auditorium facilities. Schools are becoming tech centers as much as they are functioning as places for face-to-face teaching and learning. The current online tests foreshadow the induction of students into so-called personalized learning. For some future scenarios that are earnestly being pursued by entrepreneurs, look at http://www.knowledgeworks.org/sites/default/files/k12-teaching-scenarios-decade-disruption_1.pdf
I know this may sound cynical, but the standardization movement has wanted to de-professionalize and outsource teaching to computers from the get go, and that effort has been supported by federal policies narrowly focussed on test scores, data-mongering, and support for innovations with a tech component. McKinsey & Co wrote the plan for Arne Duncan’s efforts to beat the drum for tech-rich education, including classrooms with one teacher for about 100 students and the duty to supervise several low wage aids and aspiring teachers. No one in this setting is envisioned as having job security unless they meet production quotas for the key metric in evaluation–test scores.
Here is an example of this trend in higher education. In 2014, Gates distributed over $23 million to six commercial companies and two institutions (Stanford and Rice Universities) “to develop, distribute, and implement a new generation of digital courseware that is high-quality, personalized, affordable, scalable, and improves student outcomes, particularly among low-income and disadvantaged students in high enrollment undergraduate general education courses.”
High enrollment and general education courses–meaning those usually required for the purpose of retaining some remnant of a liberal arts tradition in “higher” education. Peel off those courses for the computing gurus. With those courses gone, the current aim of making higher education all about careers is realized.
The rating systems in the works for higher education (see Politico today) will be looking at the economic payoff of various majors and programs. And if that USDE funded rating contract falters then Gates can just tweak his ratings schemes to take up the slack.
Teachers unite, unionize, and at every level of education–pre-school through graduate education.
LikeLike
Yes, Laura.
I was surprised to learn that, in prior legislation, Ohio’s Inter-University Council, made up of the presidents of Ohio’s public universities, was behind the introduction of the union-busting ploy of retitling professors as “managers”.
Through democratic vote, Ohioans rejected their scheme by a 2/3 vote.
Are ALEC and IUC behind it this time?
LikeLike
TFA is using the term manager much more to refer to the role of teacher.
LikeLike
Laura,
If Republicans or dinos get control of the Department of Labor, I fear they will succeed in the re-classification.
In our local paper, an eager new recruit wrote about her optimism in joining TFA and beginning her career. Either it will be a springboard to a reformer job, financed by hedge funds, tech companies or villanthropies or, she’ll wake up in 5 years recognizing, the vise that makes her responsible for variables beyond her control, her depleted financial circumstances and, a dismal reputation for her career, which was irrevocably harmed by those who recruited her.
I appreciate the insight and knowledge reflected in your posts.
LikeLike
Ohio Catholic diocese are using the term “minister” for teachers. Same idea.
LikeLike
Laura,
You’re 100% right.
LikeLike
Well…the idea of union action sounds great in theory. But when so many states are right-to-work, what should teachers do? Lose their jobs, homes, credit rating and everything else walking out for what is right? I frankly don’t have the courage to do that, and I suspect many other teachers are trapped as well. I know–that’s what the deformers are counting on. It is easy for people in a union state to talk about union action. It’s not so easy for those of us in right-to-work states.
LikeLike
Agree. That is why the union-busting legislation has been put in place.
LikeLike
It is also why New York, a strong bastion of worker rights and democratic values, is in the vanguard of this epic struggle.
Democratic Gov. Cuomo betrayed the citizens of his state.
LikeLike
I’m not so sure that it is that easy in union states either. First of all, all non-tenured teachers can be let go without cause. Secondly, a strike would have to meet the criteria established in each contract. That’s a lot of districts that have to have contracts with similar provisions. No one has protection in a situation like that. It only works if everyone strikes; that is the only protection.
LikeLike
I agree with the description of what is happening in education, but not with the solution. In NM, I kept wondering where the unions were while horrific policies were being imposed by the politicians. When they decided to act, it was too little too late. I have to wonder if it was another “follow the money” event. Towards the end of last school year when teachers were concerned about the evaluation process, we were invited to attend a local school board meeting with no fear of repercussions. At that meeting the local NEA president talked about a group that NEA was working closely with to improve education in the state (i.e. enact “reforms”). Unfamiliar with the designator, I looked it up after the meeting and discovered that it was developed and sponsored by the NM Public Education Department led by Skandara. Talk about the fox in the hen house!
LikeLike
Thank you, Dr. Berliner! And Dr. Ravitch for printing his words. I am happy he is a professor in Arizona. However, Arizona is going to be one of the most difficult states to crack. We are a “right to work state”, so no union help here, and our “association” is pitiful. When I was forced out, I received no help from them. My son is currently attending ASU to become a high school teacher with an emphasis in history. I know he has to figure this out, but I fear he will not succeed as a teacher with the current system. My son-in-law has worked one year at a charter school and will be resigning at the end of this year. He has a 6 month old son he wants to spend time with and barely sees him except for weekends. He was told he isn’t a team player, because he wants more time with his son. Teaching is supposed to be about caring as well as learning. Not any more!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike