A few days ago, I saluted Representative Jimmie Don Aycock of Killeen, Texas, for his plan to add $3 billion to the public schools’ budget.
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, a powerful figure in the state, prefers vouchers.
Happily, the Houston Chronicle published an editorial supporting Aycock and dismissing vouchers. This is the real world, folks, not fantasy land, where wishes are horses. The legislature cut the public schools by $5 billion and has restored only a tiny fraction. Meanwhile the children are majority Hispanic, and they are in public schools. Their schools need the resources, the teachers, the class sizes, and the librarians and social workers to help them now.
The Chronicle says:
“While Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick scampers down a rabbit trail in pursuit of costly school-voucher legislation, an influential public education policymaker in the House is doing what’s right for Texas school children and Texas taxpayers.
“State Rep. Jimmie Don Aycock, R-Killeen, announced last week that the lower chamber will tackle the daunting task of finding a fair and equitable way for the state to fund its public schools.
By taking up the challenge instead of waiting for a state Supreme Court ruling, the low-key Republican chairman of the Public Education Committee shows us what a true representative of the people looks like. A formerKilleen school board member, Aycock does the people’s business with little fanfare, with an effort to be fair and open to all sides and with a goal to getting useful things accomplished….
“Patrick’s beloved voucher scheme would divert taxpayer money from public education to cover all or part of a student’s tuition at a private or religious school, with little or no accountability to the people whose money is being spent. Aycock, on the other hand, understands the urgent need to invest in the state’s public schools and their five million students, 60 percent of them economically disadvantaged. He’s also aware, we’re sure, that the number of low-income students is growing at twice the rate of the overall student population….
“The voucher issue distracts from the fact that public schools, whatever their problems, are the backbone of every Texas community. They require attention and investment.
Aycock’s proposal would add $800 million to the $2.2 billion the House already had allocated to public schools. In the Senate, Patrick and his voucher cohorts, including state Sen. Larry Taylor, R-Friendswood, have proposed about $1.8 billion less for public education than the House. Patrick also is pushing hard for tax cuts worth about $4.6 billion.”
Taylor, chairman of the Senate Education Committee, is sponsoring legislation that would create a $100 million private-school tuition program to help lower-income students pay for private or religious schools. Patrick told the Education Committee last week that the legislation would give approximately 10,000 students an opportunity to escape failing schools, primarily urban schools. Funding would come through donations from businesses, which in turn would receive tax credits.”
“Since the House and Senate are so far apart on the issues, they probably won’t be addressed in depth until a special session this summer. When that happens, we urge lawmakers to look to the man from Killeen for direction and not the man pushing vouchers.”

Diversion is a good way of putting it.
Most reforms these days seem to be stops along the way to answers, rather than the answers.
LikeLike
Thank you Representative Aycock, I could almost vote Republican.
Tomorrow we kick off the 7th grade STAAR writing tests. Two lost days of instruction. After the test, which will only take most kids 2-3 hours, we will sit in silence until all are finished. Then back to the classrooms for the rest of the day. Forget about instruction. And how much will we get done in the next two days? Everyone will be burned out.
How much will the state spend on these tests? Money that could be better spent, I’m sure.
And we already know how well these kids write, read, etc. What a waste of time, money, and effort. No wonder many of these kids can’t wait to get out of school.
LikeLike
Are there 10,000 openings in private and religious schools? Or is this for parents already paying? How do you guarantee 10,000 new students In their underperforming schools will be able to use the vouchers. My experience was with religious schools who asked underperforming students to leave. The institution could not seem to reach or teach these students, so I did– in a public school. Doesn’t seem to bode well for the taxpayers of T exas unless the taxpayer is a parent paying for a private or religious school.
LikeLike
Texas legislators want businesses to receive tax credits for donating to private and religious schools.
Texas wants to be known as a faith-based corporate welfare state.
Students and parents are pawns in that scheme, especially low-income and the new majority-minority population in Texas.
“Faith-based” policies are popping up all over to make visible the right of corporations to have business practices guided by the religious conscience of the owners, free of government interference.
The Supreme Court ruling in the Hobby Lobby case has brought energy to others who now want to use The Religious Freedom Restoration Act to secure special rights that may well override some long-standing civil rights and “burden-filled” government regulations.
The original Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed in 1993, sponsored by Senators Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Representatives Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) and Christopher C. Cox (R-CA), was supported by a broad spectrum of conservative and liberal religious groups.
At least 20 states have versions of the law. The most recent effort to create a version in Indiana is making national news, and not exactly as expected. You can see the Governor’s rationale for signing the bill at http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=214653&information_id=212489&type&syndicate=syndicate
You will find national coverage and reaction all over the internet. The good news: A lot of big businesses threatened to pull out of Indiana.
Indiana has a pending House bill titled Freedom to Teach and Learn–meaning zones set up to prohibit teachers from collective bargaining for salary, imposing on them tiers of job classifications with no job security, also longer work hours, and more supervision of novice and paraprofessionals and such. The plan is straight out the collaboration of USDE and McKinsey & Co. on a RESPECT program. That acronym stands for “recognizing educational success, professional excellence, and collaborative teaching.” It is a euphemism for more work at less pay and if you cannot retain a highly qualified rating year over year while supervising others who know less than you do, then you are out of a job.
LikeLike
Nevada is proposing to do the very same thing. There must be something in the water.
LikeLike