Ohio seems to have an amazing number of district superintendents with integrity, unafraid to speak up. Superintendent Steve Kramer of the Madeira City schools wrote an open letter to the state superintendent Richard Ross, describing the unnecessary burden of testing.
For standing up for students, I name Steve Kramer to the honor roll.
He writes:
Dr. Richard Ross, Superintendent Ohio Department of Education
25 South Front Street
Columbus, OH 43215-4183
Dear Dr. Ross:
This week the Madeira City School District joined districts across the state and nation in implementing the new PARCC and AIR state-mandated testing. After witnessing the monumental amount of time and resources our faculty, staff and administrators have spent in preparing for, and now executing these tests, I am profoundly concerned that they are neither relevant nor important to the high quality instruction Madeira City Schools has been proud to provide for over 80 years.
State and federal legislation regarding high stakes testing has been enacted with little or no regard to best educational practice. Public school districts have been given no option but to administer the tests as mandated by law. And yet, many of our parents are now seeing first hand the amount of time that these tests are taking and questioning the overall value of their results. I would tend to agree with them.
The Madeira City Schools Board of Education and I have discussed these concerns at great length. While everyone can agree that school districts should have some measure of accountability to its taxpayers, I would argue that when those measures impact an organization’s ability to accomplish its core mission, assessment in the name of accountability has gone too far. This is certainly the case in our K-12 public schools. I urge you as an educational leader in this state to advocate for reducing the amount of state mandated testing and demand a more common sense approach that balances the needs of what we know about our students with how they learn. In Madeira, we are about kids and high quality teaching and learning, not testing.
Three clear recommendations have been talked about amongst my colleagues that I would like you to consider:
1. Continue to review the state mandated test schedule and advocate for reducing the amount of testing to one content area per grade level, per school year, starting no sooner than the third grade.
2. In your review of testing, stay focused on the state mandated tests and not on limiting the amount of diagnostic or meaningful formative assessments that actually help teachers in guiding instruction. The survey you
recently sent out neglected to focus on the state mandated tests.
3. As more mandates are discussed and debated amongst the politicians in Columbus, I urge you to support your
colleagues in the field and stand up for public education and against the misguided policies of lawmakers. Insist that lawmakers and the Ohio Department of Education involve local school leaders on any educational changes PRIOR to implementing new laws. The students of Ohio demand nothing less from the state superintendent of public instruction. Students and valuable instructional time are at risk when we chase practices that are not research-based or for that matter, are contrary to what educational research would say is effective.
I have been meeting the past few months with area superintendents and board members from southwest Ohio about how we can work together to effect change and return local control back to our communities. To that end, parents and community members of Madeira will be asked to join me in sharing their views with our elected officials on state and federally mandated testing as well as other significant issues related to our loss of local control.
Sincerely,
Steve Kramer Superintendent Madeira City Schools
cc:
Senator Bill Seitz
Representative Jonathan Dever
Ohio School Board Representative Pat Bruns, District 4
Su

“Public school districts have been given no option but to administer the tests as mandated by law.”
Well, no, there is another option. Don’t comply with the law.
LikeLike
Is non-compliance really feasible? Failing to comply would cost your district state funds, which while always declining are still necessary for just about any district.
LikeLike
Perhaps, but it’s about getting to the point that someone has to risk it and take it to court – both an actual court and the court of public opinion. Schools are so starved for money as it is, I think it might be risky for the state to withhold funding over test non-compliance without risking a riot.
LikeLike
We have a really lively debate in Ohio now and we only have that because of the anti-excessive testing activists. Nothing would have moved without them.
The witnesses for the Senate hearings were genuinely diverse in opinion and outlook and the proposed panel has people who actually work in existing Ohio public schools.
This is in a state that just two years ago had legislative hearings on ed reform where 15 of 17 witnesses/submitted statements were affiliated with StudentsFirst.
It’s really broken wide open and that’s great. We’ll all be better for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. It is the thousands of voices everyday objecting to testing insanity that will do it. Some, like the Dispatch editorial page or Ohio Senate education committee, stubbornly continue to hold on to the idea testing is necessary to punish teachers into excellence or force students to learn. But their voices seem more dissonant and their positions ignorant. Some wonder if they have even read the standards or understand the laws they are championing. The fiasco of the recent safe harbor bills or teacher evaluation silliness appears as a clown show. One exasperated Republican on Columbus on the Record exclaimed when challenged over the ineptness of testing implementation “we have to do SOMETHING!”. I prefer, “first, do no harm”.
LikeLike
Another fantastic letter
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great job opportunity in Fullerton California for a Superintendent who wants to work in one of the best districts in the nation. Please apply. We do not want to repeat the same mistakes of Florida. We are just beginning the testing process and we have a Governor who is on record of NOT BEING IN FAVOR OF NATIONAL TESTING.
LikeLike
SW Ohio. Sycamore, Mason, Little Miami, Madiera…great districts. Great superintendents.
Ours would not speak out.
LikeLike
Bravo and salute Superintendent Steve Kramer in SW Ohio. Sycamore, Mason, Little Miami, Madeira.
Please allow me to repeat what you write in point #3, as follows:
[begin quote]
3. As more mandates are discussed and debated amongst the politicians in Columbus, I urge you to support your colleagues in the field and stand up for public education and
AGAINST the MISGUIDED POLICIES of lawmakers.
INSIST that LAWMAKERS and the Ohio Department of Education
INVOLVE local school leaders on any EDUCATIONAL CHANGES
PRIOR to IMPLEMENTING NEW LAWS.
The students of Ohio demand nothing less from the state superintendent of public instruction.
Students and VALUABLE INSTRUCTIONAL TIME are AT RISK when we chase practices that are not research-based or for that matter, are CONTRARY to what educational research would say is effective.”
[end quote]
I hope that all other Superintendents will follow your lead because your valid point of view is shown as above.
Very respectfully yours,
May King in Canada
LikeLike
It will take a popular uprising to change the dynamics a la Senate Bill 5 referendum. The radical education reform (privatization) scheme foisted on Ohioans and their children is the basis for dismantling the system. Legislators who rubber stamp canned legislation from the Jeb Bush education organization and ALEC are the cause of the mayhem. The real culprit is the governors office. We’ve had 4 state superintendents and possibly 2 educational czars in a little over 4 years. Dick Ross has no control and was only hired to do the Governor’s bidding. For the almost 3 years since this barrage started we have been subjected to reforms and then on cue reforms of the reforms because the legislation was unworkable while enduring unfunded mandates and funding cuts.
Many districts like Madiera have been and are currently meeting the needs of their community. As their superintendent notes…”I am profoundly concerned that they are neither relevant nor important to the high quality instruction Madeira City Schools has been proud to provide for over 80 years”. There is no logic to what we are doing other than the destruction of the public school system in Ohio. I liken this situation to a Dr. that prescribes Chemo to a healthy patient as a preventative measure in case they were to get ill in the future. Many, Many, Many schools are doing the right things and turning out a fine product. Ohio’s taxpayers and citizens need to see this for what it is….a RADICAL attempt to overturn the system of public education. The galling thing is the legislature refuses to do anything to the Charter System which has and still continues to fail. They are rumored to be getting a funding increase and are exempt from testing, teacher evaluation, and the CC+ initiative. Must be a good thing to have friends in high places and cash.
LikeLike