Thomas Picketty, the French economist whose book “Capitalism in the 21st Century” was a huge bestseller last year, told MSNBC’s Krystal Ball that Republicans–most especially Jeb Bush–were decidedly on the wrong track in responding to inequality.
In a post on Salon.com, Picketty told the interviewer that:
“there’s a lot of hypocrisy” in the rhetoric of conservatives who condemn inequality while failing to support policies like an increased minimum wage and ramped-up infrastructure spending.
“You’re saying let’s tax the top and invest that money into education for all. [Jeb Bush] is a proponent of school choice, of giving schools vouchers so they can attend public school or private school, whatever they want. Is this a good solution in terms of dealing with what he calls the opportunity gap?” Ball asks Piketty.
“From what I can see, he doesn’t want to invest more resources into education. He just wants more competition… there’s limited evidence that this is working. And I think most of all what we need is to put more public resources in the education system. Again, if you look at the kind of school, high school, community college that middle social groups in America have access to, this has nothing to do with the very top schools and universities that some other groups have access to,” Piketty replies.
“[I]f we want to have more growth in the future and more equitable growth in the future, we need to put more resources in the education available to the bottom 50% or 80% of America. So it’s not enough just say it, as Jeb Bush seems to be saying, but you need to act on it, and for this you need to invest resources,” he says.
Asked about claims by Bush and other conservatives that a so-called “skills gap” is responsible for the growth in inequality, Piketty dings that narrative as simplistic.
“The minimum wage today is lower than it was 50 years ago, unions are very weak, so you need to increase the minimum wage in this country today. The views that $7 and hour is the most you can pay low-skilled worker in America today… I think is just wrong — it was more 50 years ago and there was no more unemployment 50 years ago than there is today. So I think we could increase the minimum wage,” Piketty says, adding that the U.S. should also invest in “high-productivity jobs that produce more than the minimum wage.”
Education is important, Piketty acknowledges, but education alone is not enough to ameliorate inequality.
“You need wage policy and you need education policy,” he says. “And in order to have adequate education policy, you also need a proper tax policy so that you have the proper public resources to invest in these public services. Also you need infrastructure. Many of the public infrastructure in this country are not at the level of what the very developed should have. You cannot say, like many of the Republicans are saying, we can keep cutting tax on these top income groups who have already benefitted a lot from growth and globalization over the past 30 years.”
Wow! An economist who actually gets the struggles of education. I didn’t know that was possible.
I just think there’s consequences to obscuring the issue:
“The proposed changes include a system that ranks colleges’ affordability, which Obama hopes Congress will use to determine how much federal financial aid money it sends to each school. He also said he would use federal dollars to encourage colleges to experiment with innovative — and potentially cost-cutting — classroom methods.
But the plan to tie federal financial aid to colleges’ affordability is complicated by the fact that the decline in state funding is the main culprit in the tuition inflation that has increasingly made college unaffordable.”
Telling people “transparency” will help them afford college when the “main culprit” is states cutting funding to colleges is not helpful or, well, TRUE. Just tell them what happened so at the very least they can accept the new reality and plan for it. The funding either wasn’t collected or it went elsewhere. That’s what happened. That’s why their share of tuition went up.
Then people can at least ask “what happened?”
It’s just such a phony “debate”. We’ll happily discuss anything but money, because talking about money might offend some people. Instead we get ranking systems and “cost-cutting innovations”.
French?!?!
Yes, and it’s spelled Piketty.
Perhaps, but I think you are being a little picketty.
chuckle chuckle!
There is no logic or research that supports the current trend of “throwing out the baby with the bath water” attitude with regard to public education. There is no indications that destroying public education will benefit anyone other than those that seek to profit from turning education into a business. Public education has been a route for upward mobility for millions of Americans, and it is founded on democratic principles. Why more elected officials are silent while corporations attack is beyond me? The privatization movement is not being led by irate parents. It is being led by complicit politicians whose favor has been purchased. Parents that oppose closing of public schools are being ignored. Corrupt governors and mayors are seizing power from local boards of education, and taking decisions regarding education out of the hands of the citizens. This is a fascism, not democracy.
Here is a economist’s view that supports your views “retired teacher” … when you say, “The privatization movement is not being led by irate parents. It is being led by complicit politicians whose favor has been purchased…” Robert Reich points to the UNDERLYING or ROOT causes of what is happening to public education. It starts right at the very foundation of our government with “checks and balances” being currently totally out of whack. If money weren’t at the root of political decisions there just might not be the Arne Duncan machine having a complete and total stranglehold on the states’ public education decisions which are “bought” through political shenanigans.
http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2015/03/10/the-conundrum-of-corporation-and-nation/
Good link. Reich is an economist I can respect. As much as corporations are not looking out for America, they should not be able to decide what our children need to learn. They will look for a way to cut corners and reduce the bottom line. Their main goal is profit. How does that fit with what will benefit our students?
Who thinks a French economist will have credibility with Jeb Bush or other high flyiers in politics in the United States? French socialism…label it and dismiss it. That is what the Wall Street Journal did—not unexpectedly. Several comments at that review are also worth a look. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303825604579515452952131592
Unless I am mistaken, Picketty is also willing to say there are some very important things that economists do not (yet) know how to measure very well, like the ripple effects from the toxic mortgage-backed securities still being traded and why CEO pay is so often disconnected from performance measures. That is one I would like to understand, assuming there is a VAM operating in the corporate world. CEOs are eager to insist a VAM rating is the most objective measure of value-added by teachers to the bottom line metric in education…student test scores.
Of course he won’t have credibility with Jeb Bush, but it has nothing to do with his being French. It is enough that Picketty doesn’t agree with him. Being educated probably doesn’t do Picketty any good either. Intellectuals are not exactly revered.
Everything the reformers say, is just rhetorical backwards talk. They know what they are doing/saying is wrong; and they don’t care. There is no monetary motivation in the public schools. Certainly, a teacher’s salary has always been meager, and has gone backwards the last 20 years. When charter operators/managers are racking in the dough, and public schools are left without staff and supplies and the funding for public schools has gone down down down and public schools and kids have to do more with less, and charters and voucher schools don’t have to play by the same rules, and, yes, DO NOT have to spend monies on PEARSON’s testing, and the TFS proliferates, and all this is done while neighborhoods are protesting, to serve the few while the majority suffers….that is the plan. This is by design. Don’t give these bastards any credit for what they don’t know, cuz they know. And now, we know.
What do economists know about teachers?
Not much but they certainly have a way with policy makers who then make the decisions that affects the classroom.
So if your argument is “What does Piketty know?”, I would respond “Probably as much as Chetty and Hanushek.”
“What if?
What if grass were blue?
What if red were gray?
What if economists knew
About the things they say?
If you people haven’t been aware of Piketty, you haven’t been paying attention. His critique of capitalism is thorough and devastating. What does he know about education? He is educated, which is more than one can say for Jeb Bush. Bush just recently committed a massive breach of privacy, because he doesn’t understand basic internet protocols. Barrett Brown is in prison for much less.
Surely when all is said and done, the French have far more experience than we do in running a revolution that is for the people. Although we contributed to the inspiration of their 14 Juillet, they have brought liberte, egalite et fraternite to a level that we cannot fathom in the US. There is dignity for citizens, a safety net, a true health care system, sick leave with pay, 6 weeks of vacation, cheap internet, respect for fresher food.
We can mock the French until french fries stop selling at MacDonalds, but they know how to live and have a quality of life that does not exist on our shores, except, possibly for the extremely wealthy. But even they would not know what to do with it.
How wonderful that Picketty is commenting on our vile society.
Merci monsieur, encore, encore!
It is the intentional rhetoric of conservatives to sound “compassionate” while refusing to pay their fair share of taxes or to fund an excellent public school system for all. It’s not hypocrisy-it’s intentional to fool the American masses. They want everything going to the top, they want a cheap labor force, they want the masses desperate enough to fight their wars, they know and intentionally make sure nothing trickle downs, they do not want social programs for the masses, including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, public schools, and healthcare, and they want control of the media so they can spew their propaganda and cherry-pick what we lowly masses hear and read. They do want to own the politicians and the courts, they do want to rewrite the laws in their favor, they do want Wall Street untouched, and they do want all our safety nets taken away and they do want deregulation so they can dirty and destroy the planet because they’re not worried about our health and safety, Many, if not most, are funded by billionaires like the Koch Brothers, the Waltons, and other libertarians who in their patriarchal society believe that they know what’s best for the rest of us, and “democracy” and voting should be limited to the few like them who should be in charge. Our Constitution is theirs for the taking.
I love to read the Common Core test cheerleading, because it’s inadvertently funny 🙂
“I believe this makes PARCC the largest battery of tests in America (until Smarter Balanced passes it later this year)”
I think an ed reform politician should run on that: “I supported the largest battery of tests in America!”
They could have it running the Arnergizer Bunny.
To Sharsand2013;
Your post is the most insightful and true meaning in every word, every sentence that packs in one small paragraph.
Yes, the power and the rich has always had one step ahead of the public. And yes, there are always plenty of people in snobbish class who love to be a favor slave for a crumb of money, fame, privilege, and satisfied lusty emotion from the rich and the power.
All conscientious people will relentlessly do their best to advocate for civility, humanity and equality for the unfortunate. Que sera, sera. Whatever be, will be. Back2basic