This is a startling blog post that has been going viral. It was written by Michael Lambert of the Gloversville Teachers Association. It warns that Governor Andrew Cuomo and Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch are together planning changes that would destroy public education in New York and end the careers of many teachers who ran afoul of the state’s evaluation requirements. Those evaluation requirements are based on value-added-measures that expert Audrey Amrein Beardsley recently described as “idiotic.”
Eric DeCarlo, president of the Scotia-Glenville Teachers Association, adapted it from a letter written by Mike Mosal, president of the Burnt Hills Teachers Association; these teachers work in small districts in upstate New York. The letter has been spread widely among teachers, parents, and community members upstate. Ric and Mike see the handwriting on the wall, and they think it is menacing.
This is part of the letter. It is worth reading the letter in its entirety:
Recently, the Governor’s office and Regents Chancellor Tisch exchanged letters about the future of education in New York. The links to these letters were sent out in an email last week to the Association. You can read the full letters at those links. The conversation between these two can be broken down into the following “reforms” that could be implemented this spring.
1. 40% of teacher evaluation should be tied to growth scores. The local 20% achievement (SLO) should be eliminated.
2. Any teacher deemed “ineffective” on the new 40% state score would be deemed ineffective overall (no matter their scores on the local observation 60%).
3. Any teacher who receives two consecutive ineffective ratings would not be allowed back into the classroom (apparently without a 3020-A hearing or due process. Additionally, all of the current 3020-A hearing officers would be replaced with “state employees”. The Regents seek to replace the last gatekeepers of due process with their own appointees.
4. No student could be scheduled to have an “ineffective” teacher two years in a row (by proposed changes to state education law). This would likely require disclosure of which teachers are “ineffective” for scheduling purposes (and possibly to parents). This is a massive invasion of privacy that was already legislated. Such information is currently not shared outside of the administration and impacted teacher. Parents can only gain this information through a district determined process and, even then, the parents can only know where their student’s teacher falls on the “HEDI” range.
5. Merit pay would be established and, apparently, would not be collectively bargained. Districts would be empowered to “design innovative compensation models based on educator performance”. According to Chancellor Tisch’s letter, our Association would not be privy to the process for how this “compensation” would be doled out and what the criteria would be for merit pay.
6. Teachers would be required to wait five years before they could be granted tenure. Additionally, teacher certification tests would become vastly more challenging.
7. Schools who do not meet the Governor and Chancellor Tisch’s performance expectations, would be closed and replaced with “institutions that are up to the task” which would likely be for-profit charter schools. Additionally, Chancellor Tisch is effectively asking the state legislature for unfettered authority to open and close schools based on metrics (state test scores) that she controls. The Regents and the State Education Department can raise or lower cut scores, and therefore “achievement” gains or losses, at a whim. We have seen this over the past two years as the Common Core assessments become integrated into the APPR. This is, without question, unlimited power for Tisch, the Regents, and the enemies of public education. Furthermore, Tisch seeks to uncap the limit on for-profit charter schools.
These changes are not speculative or “what if’s”. Read the letters linked above, read what NYSUT is saying. This is our FUTURE!!!!
In 2010, all of us (NYSUT included) were caught off guard at the scope and scale of Race to the Top, the Common Core standards, and the APPR law 3012-c. These initiatives completely changed education as we know it. These changes, with very few exceptions, were wholly negative for teachers and bad for children.
Here we are, four years later, with two of the most important figures in state politics and education having an open discussion about how to unequivocally destroy public education in the state of New York. They have become our enemies and our students enemies. They are brash, unencumbered, and openly declaring war on our profession. They seek to eliminate collective bargaining’s impact in the areas of evaluation. They ignore mandatory subjects of negotiation, like compensation. They have so little respect for teachers, and the institutions that represent us, that they openly write about changing due process tenure. This would have been unthinkable five years ago. They do not care about what’s best for kids, teachers, or schools; only headlines and perception. There is no subterfuge here. Governor Cuomo and Chancellor Tisch seek to end public education as we know it. They want to break the back of NYSUT. They want to make our loca irrelevant. If we do not act now, all will be lost.
Simply put, we are at war!
I say to you now, we must become part of the solution. We must take up this cause as we never have before. We cannot be blind to what is about to occur in this state budget cycle.
Yup.
We…NYSUT, every teacher, and every group on our side….have to be willing, NOW, to lay it all on the line.
Negotiating ANY of this is out of the question.
If we are not willing to go literally all the way, then we collectively, and most especially NYSUT, have to turn our resources and energy towards helping teachers leave the profession and make that transition with dignity and perhaps some financial counciling and guidance towards repurposing to other jobs outside of education. That’s the deal here.
If these things happen (and I won’t even begin up the possibility of the Campbell Brown tenure lawsuit, or the 2017 NYS constitutional convention), no matter what they say, NYSUT is no longer an organization with any power or meaning. It’s done.
This fight is for keeps now. As of today, we are not winning.
No to all of it. No negotiations. No backroom deals. That’s the only path. If we don hear that precisely and explicitly, and soon, from NYSUT, consider it all lost.
Agree. Teachers need to start thinking differently. Those with an entrepreneurial bent may wish to start investigating opening their own schools.
There are 2 things that will stop him:
Sheldon Silver (who he is constantly trying to discredit), or a political scandal – and Silver showed he could be bought if Cuomo put enough “other things” on the table.
What do we do to save public education from privatization? His language is precisely that the market will solve inequalities for students – and it will do it while making a massive profit for Wall Street and foreign investors.
Reblogged this on DCGEducator: Doing The Right Thing and commented:
It is time to no longer be cowardly lions or paper tigers. Choose your metaphor and fight.
It is time to no longer be cowardly lions or paper tigers. Choose your metaphor and fight.
I watched the State of the State…I don’t think I have ever felt so angry and discouraged. The picture painted of public education was so completely unfair to the majority of NY public schools. Being both a nurse and a retired teacher I tend to think diagnostically. If a nurse looses two patients they are not fired but a teacher with two years of poor scores will lose their job. The majority of educators in NY have Masters degrees yet Cuomo felt it necessary to indicate we are unprepared for our jobs. I don’t know how you fight the machine but I can tell you as a current BoE member I will be doing just that.
State budgets have become the tool for governors to use to get control of public education without having to take any consideration of voters’ opinions or demands. Budgets are not subject to any sort of public approval; they need only be passed by state legislators.
And the Right accuses POTUS of subterfuge to get what he wants……
This is the way corporations work.
They do not do things democratically.
They do not put policies up for a vote.
They do not put issues up for discussion.
Until they’ve eliminated all the alternatives.
Here’s how the Governor’s office puts some of these points:
113. Reform Teacher Ratings
Currently, we allocate 20 percent of the score to the state-test/student growth measure; 20 percent to a local measure that inflates scores and leads to unnecessary testing; and 60 percent to qualitative measures of effectiveness (including observations and artifacts) that are not standard across districts and are entirely manipulable. The Governor proposes that the teacher evaluation system be simplified and standardized. Instead of two student growth measures, we will have one. We will eliminate the local measure. Fifty percent of the score will be based on state tests, or, in the case of teachers in non-tested grades or subjects, a student growth measure that measures one year of academic growth.
The remaining 50 percent of the score will be allocated to observations and shall include at least two. At least one observation must be conducted by an independent observer to be selected from among the following options: 1) a principal or other trained administrator from within or outside the school district; or 2) a trained independent evaluator from a list of entities with a demonstrated record of effectiveness and expertise in this area, as developed by the SED commissioner; or 3) an appointed faculty member at a State University of New York or a City University of New York school of education. Thirty-five percent of the score must be allocated to this impartial observation; the remaining fifteen percent may be allocated to an observation by a school administrator.
115. Reform Teacher Tenure
Tenure provides lifetime job protection to teachers. It was created in the 19th century to protect college professors’ academic freedom and protect them from political pressure. The origins of tenure and its use at the university level are not aligned with its current role or implementation in our K-12 system. We currently award lifetime job protection to teachers after only three years. To ensure that we are giving tenure only to teachers who are performing at a high level, the Governor proposes that a teacher must receive five consecutive annual ratings of effective or highly effective before tenure is granted. A teacher who fails to meet this requirement for tenure shall remain probationary until he or she is able to meet this threshold for tenure consideration. In addition, we will clarify that districts retain authority to dismiss probationary teachers at any time for any reason (performance or otherwise).
117. Reform the Teacher Removal Process
The current teacher discipline and termination system, commonly known as 3020-a hearings, is broken. The hearings are costly and time-consuming for districts, and allow arbitrators to overrule administrators’ determinations of competency and of appropriate remedies. Administrators take on protracted battles that they may or may not win, at great cost to themselves and their school communities, in attempting to eliminate ineffective and incompetent educators in their buildings. The Governor proposes common-sense reforms to ensure that the 3020-a process is effective in removing teachers who are consistently underperforming or who have engaged in misconduct. These reforms will include changes that streamline the hearing process, shift the presumptions, and strengthen evidentiary standards.
In the case of a teacher accused of physical or sexual abuse of a child, there will be an expedited hearing with a decision rendered within 60 days. We already have an expedited process for teachers deemed incompetent, but we must also have one for teachers accused of harming children. The teacher alleged to have engaged in abuse will be suspended without pay, pending the outcome of the hearing, and will receive retroactive pay if the hearing officer finds in his or her favor.
In the case of a teacher pursuing a hearing to challenge charges of incompetence based on a pattern of ineffective teaching or performance, the Governor proposes creating a presumption in favor of the administrator. Such a pattern shall constitute prima facie evidence of incompetence that can be rebutted by the teacher only by clear and convincing evidence that the calculation of one of his or her summative ratings was fraudulent. If such a rebuttal is unsuccessful, the hearing officer’s finding shall be just cause for removal absent extraordinary circumstances.
The Governor also proposes eliminating the current legal requirement that administrators must attempt to “rehabilitate” teachers who are incompetent or engage in misconduct. Such a change will make it more difficult for hearing officers to force reinstatement of teachers who have performed poorly or who have engaged in misconduct. The proposed reforms will also remove the requirement that children must testify in person and will allow them to testify via sworn written or video statements.
Here’s another crack at formatting this for emphasis.
113. Reform Teacher Ratings
Currently, we allocate 20 percent of the score to the state-test/student growth measure; 20 percent to a local measure that inflates scores and leads to unnecessary testing; and 60 percent to qualitative measures of effectiveness (including observations and artifacts) that are not standard across districts and are entirely manipulable. The Governor proposes that the teacher evaluation system be simplified and standardized. Instead of two student growth measures, we will have one. We will eliminate the local measure. Fifty percent of the score will be based on state tests, or, in the case of teachers in non-tested grades or subjects, a student growth measure that measures one year of academic growth.
The remaining 50 percent of the score will be allocated to observations and shall include at least two. At least one observation must be conducted by an independent observer to be selected from among the following options: 1) a principal or other trained administrator from within or outside the school district; or 2) a trained independent evaluator from a list of entities with a demonstrated record of effectiveness and expertise in this area, as developed by the SED commissioner; or 3) an appointed faculty member at a State University of New York or a City University of New York school of education. Thirty-five percent of the score must be allocated to this impartial observation; the remaining fifteen percent may be allocated to an observation by a school administrator.
115. Reform Teacher Tenure
Tenure provides lifetime job protection to teachers. It was created in the 19th century to protect college professors’ academic freedom and protect them from political pressure. The origins of tenure and its use at the university level are not aligned with its current role or implementation in our K-12 system. We currently award lifetime job protection to teachers after only three years. To ensure that we are giving tenure only to teachers who are performing at a high level, the Governor proposes that a teacher must receive five consecutive annual ratings of effective or highly effective before tenure is granted. A teacher who fails to meet this requirement for tenure shall remain probationary until he or she is able to meet this threshold for tenure consideration. In addition, we will clarify that districts retain authority to dismiss probationary teachers at any time for any reason (performance or otherwise).
117. Reform the Teacher Removal Process
The current teacher discipline and termination system, commonly known as 3020-a hearings, is broken. The hearings are costly and time-consuming for districts, and allow arbitrators to overrule administrators’ determinations of competency and of appropriate remedies. Administrators take on protracted battles that they may or may not win, at great cost to themselves and their school communities, in attempting to eliminate ineffective and incompetent educators in their buildings. The Governor proposes common-sense reforms to ensure that the 3020-a process is effective in removing teachers who are consistently underperforming or who have engaged in misconduct. These reforms will include changes that streamline the hearing process, shift the presumptions, and strengthen evidentiary standards.
In the case of a teacher accused of physical or sexual abuse of a child, there will be an expedited hearing with a decision rendered within 60 days. We already have an expedited process for teachers deemed incompetent, but we must also have one for teachers accused of harming children. The teacher alleged to have engaged in abuse will be suspended without pay, pending the outcome of the hearing, and will receive retroactive pay if the hearing officer finds in his or her favor.
In the case of a teacher pursuing a hearing to challenge charges of incompetence based on a pattern of ineffective teaching or performance, the Governor proposes creating a presumption in favor of the administrator. Such a pattern shall constitute prima facie evidence of incompetence that can be rebutted by the teacher only by clear and convincing evidence that the calculation of one of his or her summative ratings was fraudulent. If such a rebuttal is unsuccessful, the hearing officer’s finding shall be just cause for removal absent extraordinary circumstances.
The Governor also proposes eliminating the current legal requirement that administrators must attempt to “rehabilitate” teachers who are incompetent or engage in misconduct. Such a change will make it more difficult for hearing officers to force reinstatement of teachers who have performed poorly or who have engaged in misconduct. The proposed reforms will also remove the requirement that children must testify in person and will allow them to testify via sworn written or video statements.
Terrifying. How many new teachers will get five scores in a row of effective? By their very nature they are “developing”. I guess Cuomo assumes new teachers burst out of Zeus’s head like Athena, fully formed and ready.
What are some suggestions? One from me is that we begin a rigorous add campaign to counter these horrible assumptions about public school teachers. Can we even charge the governor of slander and libel? Why are we so silent in defending our work and our integrity?
Meant “ad”.
1) mount a huge boycott against Cuomo’s girlfriend’s TV show and any products she has.
2) 600000 calls to state reps. Daily.
3) WALK THE F@”! OUT…..STATEWIDE….let em see how they need 600000 professionals in classrooms doing their thing every day. (I know ALOT of people will start to analyze this last one and give billions of good reasons not to, but we have to start thinking on essential levels now.)
Will the whole of higher education in NY State remain silent while this happens to K-12 education, and teacher education programs are slashed?
Will the NY press remain silent or cheer on the leaders of this takeover?
Will there be enough informed publicty on the social media to create a scandal?
Will teachers make news through acts of civil disobedience? Can they afford that? Can they afford not to?
Is this the Stonewall for public education in NY?
If there is not a large and preferably coordinated backlash from universities (the state system and private institutions) as well as the press, then there seems to me a tacit acceptance that public education should be a tax subsidized playground for venture and vulture capitalists
This is collusion of the worst kind. Two people that never attended public schools seek to end them in a sneaky, undemocratic way.
They both need to get a blood test to check for high toxicity mercury levels because obviously their neurons are misfiring.
To be clear, Cuomo’s correspondence with Tisch is old news. If you want to know what his education plan is, he officially announced it today as part of a 500-page document. I excerpted a few hot-button paragraphs, at least one of which goes beyond what was set out in the letter discussed in the post Diane has linked to.
Does he even attempt to explain how his plan will improve education? Who in their right mind would want to be a teacher in New York? I can’t believe that parents, grandparents, uncles and aunts will passively accept his plans for public education. It is vindictive and destructive. This man is sick.
I was thinking the same thing about who will want to teach there.
Tenure is not lifetime job protection for K12 teachers. They don’t have it, so stop peddling the lie they do here. They have only the same right as other public employees to a hearing. Only post secondary professors who qualify have anything remotely approaching lifetime appointments. Privatized deliberately conflate the two in order to gut the public sector for private gain.
Meant privatizers.
Educators please stand up and fight for what is right. Who will suffer the most poor black children. Middle class people will take care of themselves. Middle class children get Montessori schools and poor black children get strict discipline.
You have a slightly warped sense of what it means or has meant to be middle class. It is going to take all those middle class families to defeat this rephorm agenda. Contrary to popular opinion, we can’t all afford Montessori or for that matter want it instead of solid public education. What Cuomo and Tisch are doing will hit all of public classrooms, urban, suburban and rural. I am not a New Yorker, but I don’t see how you gain anything by disparaging your middle class, which I imagine is quite diverse.
When they shut down the schools and bring in the charters, are the charters going to be held to these “high” standards? Are all of the charter school teachers going to be certified, experienced, highly qualified? Are charter school teachers subjected to the same evaluations, or will TNTP and TFA be the saviors?
Looks like they will stop at nothing to close schools and bring in the privatizers/profitizers, who don’t have to play by the same rules.
These are the questions I have too.
Why are reformers like Cuomo so
sure people will want to teach in charters? What possible things could backfire in the destruction of public Ed for those so certain that is the right path?
Charters can do NO Wrong!
Their policies are theirs. Their teachers don’t have to be certified, according to their charter. They don’t have to take specific tests or follow little of any regs – special ed., but those kids are mostly excluded.
This is about ‘sticking it to public school teachers’ ONLY,
Only 1 Question: will we tolerate this lying down?
Good god some of this is worse than I heard. So you need 5 years to get tenure, 2 years of ineffective ratings to be dismissed, a presumption of incompetence favoring the administrator, and they have no obligation to assist the teacher in improving before dismissal.
Sink or swim and the admin is always right. Why do these policies favor dismissal in almost all situations based on the whims of administrators?
The war started over thirty years ago with the “A Nation At Risk” report. This is a pointed, insidious, long term war on democracy and it is being paid for by our own (tax) money.
So, when Cuomo’s plan goes through, my principal’s observations (who spends an entire year with me) will only account for 15% of my evaluation. 35% will come from outside observations, and 50% will come from scores of 6 days of testing. 85% of my evaluation (just like every other teacher in NY) will be based on 7 days of teaching with local control reduced to a measly 15%. Nice.
During Vietnam, protesters burned draft cards. Pearson sure sends us a lot of flammable material….
All of the NY/NYC teacher and administrator unions should hold a huge rally with a blazing bonfire and vow to never administer another high stakes (APPR) standardized test again.
This didn’t suddenly occur. It’s been building up for decades. Now it’s at full steam and about to run us over.
I got Mulgrew’s appeals for united action in my email. I hope it’s not too little too late. As is, I think that our union leadership (both nationally and in NYC) has aided and abetted in this trajedy. Look at the deals we’ve made and with whom. What did they expect?
And when this new and unproven criteria for teachers fails- then what?
During Vietnam, protesters burned draft cards. Pearson sure sends us a lot of flammable material….
All of the NY/NYC teacher and administrator unions should hold a huge rally with a blazing bonfire and vow to never administer another high stakes (APPR) standardized test again.
I remember when the Governor’s father offered to “fix” education in NY back in the 80’s. Every year back in the early part of my career I would get a pink slip from my school because the mandate for Technology Education was being potentially cut as part of Mario Cuomo’s “Mandate Relief”. Was he right? Now districts are scrambling to add Project Lead the Way engineering programs. I now teach several different courses so that I can meet the future career needs of my students. You can’t turn around without hearing legislators say we need more STEM classes. The nation is talking about how students get out of high school and have no skills to get anything but a minimum wage job, but back then it was “cut the fluff”. Mario Cuomo did many good things, but history has shown that he was way off base with that proposal. I believe however that he was honestly trying to help district cope with budget shortfalls. Our current Governor Cuomo has no such noble plan. His speeches are political theater. He is in the pocket of the big charter money and is shining up his plan on a run for the White House. He never mentions that most teachers are hard working dedicated educators who went to college to serve the youth of NY. He only says that we need more charters because the poor kids in NY are only failing because the teachers are failing them. He blames us for low test scores and hushes parents who say that there is too much test prep by passing a law that says that we can not do it more than 2% of the time. Charters, however, build their foundation on test prep and counsel and suspend failures out so they can make their data look good. Then he uses the arbitrary CCSS passing scores as a cudgel to beat teachers with. The CCSS were designed as a progressive system that builds on the previous year’s goals. Just implement it now, “Build the Airplane in the Air”! Rather than starting in Kindergarten, we just implemented it and the tests in every grade and surprise the test scores are bad. Then he taxed NY schools with the “Gap Elimination Adjustment” which balanced the state budget by making schools loose millions in aid over 6 years. Then last year right before election time, he raises the school funding budget to just above the 2008 levels, where they peaked, and claimed he raised school funding to the highest level ever in NY!!! More political theater. I think this governor will do many good things, but killing public education Louisiana style won’t be one of them.
“…I think this governor will do many good things…”
What makes you think that?
Thanks for the reply. I don’t like him and didn’t vote for him.
However,
He is planning to raise minimum wage. More Pre-K $, Free college for top students who teach for 5 years in a high need district. Expand the Dream act, Criminal Justice proposals on shooting incidents. Those have potential, but he is just lining up for the White House.
I didn’t even get to mention how stupid the tax cap is. Cut our funding with the GEA, then propose a tax cap with a reward for not approving more than 2% increase! I got a check for 24$. That was his bribe for voters who only vote yes when school budgets stay under the cap. Probably cost the state more than that to print and send it to me. Now if I was handing out 20$ bills to people who vote yes I would be in jail. So how is it legal to do it when he does it?
Thanks for the reply.
Some of Cuomos ideas sound nice…but from what I’ve seen of him, he’s long on promises and short on delivering. The man doesn’t walk the talk.
STRIKE
This might be a ruse. “Ask for the world when all you really want is one continent”.
Cuomo’s demands are so complete and severe that there’s sure to be a backlash. So, he eventually backs down and asks for a smaller concession: that “archaic” tenure rule.
Sitting with another teacher at lunch and I came up with this joke:
“What does Andrew Cuomo do after he runs over teachers? Puts the tank in reverse.”
Sad, but true.
I’ve already called my representatives, have you?
Made this joke in the faculty room today:
What does Andrew Cuomo do after he runs over teachers? Puts the tank in reverse.
Sad, but true. Have you contacted your legislators yet?