I recently posted a letter from a teacher whose message was “this too shall pass.”
Some readers took this as an expression of complacency. Just wait it out, and the billionaires will get so frustrated by their repeated failures that they will move on to disrupt something else or go back to playing polo.
The bottom line is that you never win in a confrontation by digging your head into the sand. Complacency is self-defeating. While you close your eyes to what is happening, the high-stakes testing will get worse, your community public schools will be closed, experienced teachers will be fired, and schooling will become a consumer choice, like buying milk at the grocery store (the analogy that Jeb Bush suggested at the Republican convention in 2012, that picking a school should be as easy as choosing between 1% milk, 2% milk, whole milk, chocolate milk, whatever).
And meanwhile, if we do nothing, we will find that one of the institutions considered essential to our democracy will have been destroyed by free-market ideology and greed. Instead of community public schools, where children learn to work and play together, we will have “choice” schools that increase segregation and that are free to kick out the students they don’t want. Of course, some “public” schools will be retained, as the school of last resort for the children unwanted by the choice schools.
Do any of the billionaires pushing this market-based ideology ever stop to wonder why none of the top-performing school systems in the world have the kind of school choice that they are promoting for the U.S.? Has it occurred to them that the nations they admire–those with the highest test scores–have strong public school systems with well-prepared teachers, but no vouchers and no charters?
The current corporate assault on public education will not pass unless those who oppose it take action. On one level, this means that we must organize for the next elections to support only candidates who support public education. The last election–at the gubernatorial level–was frankly a disaster, with the re-election of Scott Walker in Wisconsin, John Kasich in Ohio, Rick Scott in Florida, Rick Snyder in Michigan, Paul LePage in Maine, and others who support privatization,. The low turnout across the nation showed that not enough people were informed of what was at stake. We must do better next time and elect candidates who will strengthen families, communities, and public schools.
But there is more we can do now. As parents and teachers, we can encourage students not to take the tests. That’s called “opting out.” The tests are created by two or three major corporations that get to decide what our children should know. The results are used to rank and rate children and identify those who are failures and those who are successes. This is ridiculous. Why should the testing corporations be the arbiters of success and failure? Why should they be given the power to label our children? The standardized tests have no diagnostic value; the results come in too late to inform instruction or to provide insight into what children need more or less of in the classroom. In fact, they are utterly worthless. Tests should be written by classroom teachers, who know what they have taught. There is no particular value in knowing how your child compares to children his age in Maine and Arizona. What you really want from a test is an indication, useful to the teacher, of his strengths and weaknesses, a guide to helping him improve where improvement is needed. That is not what you get from standardized testing. What you as a parent or teacher really want is to know that children are engaged in learning, that they learn how to ask good questions and to pursue the answers, that they learn to love the pursuit of knowledge. A standardized test won’t help you reach those goals, indeed it will undermine them by teaching the importance of finding the right answer to someone else’s question.
So here is my advice: Opt out. Stop the machine that produces the data that are used to label your children, to fire his teachers, to close his school. Take away the data and insist that teachers deal with the needs of every child. Do not feed the machine built in D.C. or at Pearson. Be strategic. Do the one thing that only you have the power to do: deny them the data. Use the power you have.
Save the children. Save your schools. Save your community.

They don’t care about improving schools. They only care about making money. What is good for you is not good for them. That is their mentality.
LikeLike
I agree with you, Jenny. GREED in all forms is their mentality.
I’m with Bernie Sanders, Independent from Vermont.
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/12/02/counter-rise-oligarchy-sanders-pitches-progressive-economic-vision
LikeLike
I think the problem is deeper and worse. If you remember that great line by Michael Douglas from the movie <a href = "line by Michael Douglas from the movie Wall Street, ” ‘Greed’ … for lack of a better word … is good,” you realize that he’s not only talking about expediancy but morals as well. Greed in modern, neo-liberal economics, literally defines not only what works but what’s moral.
The only way to fight this is to not play the game. We can’t afford any more to wait “unitl they come to their senses”. They won’t, because “they” see themselves as both rational and moral.
LikeLike
Here’s the link to the scene: http://youtu.be/PF_iorX_MAw. Sorry for the HTML goof.
LikeLike
“But there is more we can do now. As parents and teachers, we can encourage students not to take the tests. That’s called “opting out.”
Quoted below is a portion of an email that every teacher in NY received from our state union leaders at NYSUT:
“Locals and individual union members who advise parents or students to opt out may face risks.”
“A teacher who in conversation with students or parents takes a position on testing contrary to the school district’s educational program may potentially be charged with misconduct or insubordination and could be subject to disciplinary action.”
The opt out movement terrifies the powers that be!
LikeLike
In Utah, teachers have been told that they could face action against their teaching licenses if they “suggest or encourage” opting out. How will parents even know it’s an option of teacher cannot tell them?
LikeLike
Start by asking for the written state ed law or binding policy or clause in your teacher oath that would prohibit speaking out and where in writing they have the right to take away your license. There probably is none. Contact the ACLU and ask their advice. “They” are probably bluffing. Threatening to revoke your teaching license could be constituted as harassment if they have no force of law. First amendment rights cannot be arbitrarily usurped.
LikeLike
In Newark, we are threatened with insubordination. It is unknown at present where the Supreme Court would draw the line between insubordination and exercise of First Amemdment protections. It is certainly possible for a teacher to be fired for statements made in public forums. Isn’t that why NY many of us are not using our names?
LikeLike
The NEA-affiliate lawyer told me that the state superintendent is within his rights to threaten our licenses.
LikeLike
TOWest, teachers likely have savvy non-teacher friends who could share Opt Out info w parents via word of mouth; social media; tacking up fliers at laundromat, supermarket bulletin boards. A few compelling paragraphs/links on handout.
LikeLike
Jenny, I agree.
It is almost impossible for us to fathem that this type of sociopathic exploitation exists and is promoted by our President & all his Super Rich friends.
RTTT Social Revolution & extinction of Education in the US.
RealTeachers and RealTeacherEdPrograms stand in the way of Super Rich & PowerMongers to get their sick minds and slimy hands on our children.
They are worth Billions to Billionaires & priceless to us.
Once Charters-R-Us are at every corner & strip mall, TFA is ‘teaching’ all children & PoliticalPolicyWonks destroyed HigherEd…and the last RealTeacher turns off the lights in a neighborhood Public School, then…they will come after parents to wrestle the last homeschooled child from their clutches – by any means necessary.
Sound paranoid? You betcha! Could any of us have predicted what is happening now? Many teachers voted for Obama, and many of us saw signs early on, but could not have predicted the PublicEducationFinalSolution.
Fight we must!
Constantly exposing their Evil!
We cannot look away!
This cannot and should not last!
LikeLike
So many are trying to opt out and are told it is not allowed. So many kids are being drowned in tests, not only of the typical standardized variety, but those that are included in a curricular package. This allows administrators to test children weekly or more under the guise of “district chosen curricular materials.’ This makes opting out even more difficult and makes children even more stressed and anxious. But they sure do get plenty of chances to pick the right answer.
LikeLike
It must be understood that this is not privatization — this is colonization — and the imperial mentality never dies, it just changes its PR from age to age.
The corporate state views itself as the government, so of course it doesn’t think it should have to pay taxes to itself, it sees itself as the entity that collects taxes from the people.
The public sector and its social institutions are just so much virgin territory, insufficiently exploited by its “native” populations, and the corporate state has its Manifest Destiny, in its own mind, to expropriate its resources from the unwashed, unincorporated masses who currently fail to appreciate its maximum capital value.
LikeLike
Even if you are right; that this too shall pass….. Children grow up so quickly. It will be too late for them.
LikeLike
There’s nothing “free market” about the standards-and-testing juggernaut. This is the work of monopolistic players in collusion with bureaucrats, many of whom have ties to the monopolists.
LikeLike
Chiara nailed it a while ago.
“Choice but not voice.” A few mandate the choices for the children of the vast majority—while they ensure something very different for THEIR OWN CHILDREN.
And they rest of us aren’t supposed to have anything to say about it.
😎
LikeLike
“ReforMerry-go-round”
Ties to monopolist
Of renown
Reformer top pol list
Merry-go-round
LikeLike
“Wild Kingdom”
Starve the beast
And save the child
Refuse the test
In Kingdoms wild
LikeLike
“Do any of the billionaires pushing this market-based ideology ever stop to wonder why none of the top-performing school systems in the world have the kind of school choice that they are promoting for the U.S.? Has it occurred to them that the nations they admire”
“–those with the highest test scores–”
“–those with the highest test scores–”
“–those with the highest test scores–”
“–those with the highest test scores–”
Has it occurred to them that “–those with the highest test scores–” are some of the most socially rigid, authoritarian societies that there are???
But then that is what those with the most would like to see. An unquestioning population.
LikeLike
Diane is right, starve the beast by opting-out, refuse to let our kids be tested to distraction, slam the dollar door feeding the testing companies. The more students opt-out, the fewer students they have to measure, the less valid their own testing. This disgraceful private war on public education can be stopped if we stop funneling our kids into their testing.
LikeLike
The babies are next:
Preschool and universal pre-k, common core standards, assessments, data collecting – all to hand the babies over to the big investors. THIS is what is coming next!! Everyone needs to research this.
Click to access fact-sheet-pdf.pdf
Reply
LikeLike
Whoa. Sickening. Find a way to make this its own topic on the blog.
The first ever ‘Social Impact Bond’, to be trialed in Utah. Any profits in this scheme are contingent on avoiding special ed & remedial services. Goldman-Sachs & Pritzken loan $ to United Way to fund pre-K. Just show the Wall Streeters your PreK program eliminated the need for future SpEd & remedial services to its students, to keep the $ flowing. How? You pre-test to see which 2.5-yr-olds are ‘likely’ to need such services in future (love to see THAT test)– then wave wand & spread pixie dust for a couple of yrs to convert them into kids who DON’T need special ed or remedial services. United Way administers. Best: nobody has to pay back loans if it doesn’t work!
What could possibly go wrong??
LikeLike
I have not heard about this. Can you please put in a link?
LikeLike
Click to access fact-sheet-pdf.pdf
LikeLike
This is from the US Department of Education on standardized testing. You know, I watched the opposition to testing grow and it was led by public school advocates; teachers and parents. It was successful too. They forced lawmakers to listen to them. Lawmakers were dragged, kicking and screaming, and they were dragged by teachers and parents, most of whom are not professional lobbyists or advocates but volunteers.
Ed reform leaders did absolutely nothing as the test piled up. In fact, they lobbied AGAINST less testing in Texas, but parent activists beat them.
Public school advocates deserve every bit of the credit for finally getting someone in power to look at testing. Yet, none of them are even mentioned in this DOE piece. To read it, one would think this came out of the efforts of Arne Duncan and the other ed reform leaders.
It’s baloney. Duncan was pressured into finally admitting his treasured testing regime was swallowing public schools whole. He didn’t lead on testing. He followed, and reacted to political pressure from parents and teachers.
They should give credit where credit is due. Public school advocates drew attention to over-testing. They did the work.
http://www.ed.gov/blog/2014/12/testing-can-we-find-the-rational-middle/
LikeLike
These interviews are so fake – is the point to humanize Arne? Cause that ain’t working.
LikeLike
see above…http://www.goldmansachs.com/what-we-do/investing-and-lending/urban-investments/case-studies/impact-bond-slc-multimedia/fact-sheet-pdf.pdf
LikeLike
“schooling will become a consumer choice”
For the overwhelming majority of parents who aren’t black or Latino, schooling already is a consumer choice. It has been for decades and decades.
You might opt for a private school, like Brearley or Dalton, or a parochial/religious school. You might have the means to move to the catchment zone of PS 29 or PS 321 or whatever else your careful research tells you is the best zone that you can afford. You might have the savvy to apply to unzoned lottery schools, or the connections to get your kid into a school you aren’t zoned for, or the money, time, and appropriate cultural background/privilege to prepare your kid for selective admissions tests. You might be able to move to a suburb; within the suburb, you might choose to pay more to live in the zone of the “best” school in town. A two-parent professional family might even choose to homeschool or “unschool”.
It’s a different story for families warehoused in hypersegregation, be it in the city or a suburb, and especially for the high number who poor. Most of the suburbs with low rates of poverty and “good” schools are basically off-limits, even if you’ve got the money. The private independent schools value visible diversity, but they want families who can pay, especially for elementary school, and they’re not interested in any kid who doesn’t rock an IQ test at the age of 4. Catholic schools are closing left and right (a trend that started before charter schools) and they aren’t what they used to be. That lower-poverty, higher-functioning neighborhood school across the park or ten blocks down the avenue? Haha, good one! That’s someone else’s neighborhood and zone. Your kid can’t go there, it’s not his neighborhood.
Enjoy an embarrassment of options while fighting viciously to keep children without any options in their segregated neighborhood schools. Justify it by claiming you want those option-less children to have the same quality of education as your kids—just not alongside your kids! Claim that you know what’s better for these kids than their own parents. Tell parents to opt out while sneering at those who suggest that the state law banning the months and months of test prep actually be enforced. Throw out bromides like “save the children” and “better education for all.”
In the absence of those meaningful, actionable strategies, it all just doesn’t look very good.
LikeLike
TIM
You continue to miss the point regarding charters. No one here wants to deny a parent the opportunity for school choice (public v. private v charter). What we object to are the policies in place that allow charters to take public school money and space. We object to charter operators that dare to claim their superiority over public schools while playing by a very different set of rules that work to their significant advantage. We object to your bogus claims that charter schools are “public” schools when they fail to meet the five major requirement: 1)Transparent finances, 2) Public/voter accountability, 3) Playing by public school rules/following all state ed mandates,
4) Serving ALL students, ALL the time.
So please STOP pretending that charters are something their not. And STOP the ridiculous, inaccurate, and unfair comparisons. Just STOP because no one wants to hear your senseless tripe any more.
LikeLike
. . . FOUR (not five) major requirements.
LikeLike
I always find it hard to find Tim’s point – he talks in merry go round rhetoric, like a reformer. Maybe he can convince me that cyanide is a healthy drink.
LikeLike
Tim: the sort of ‘choice’ to which you refer is primarily based on income. This reflects the way we fund our schools. Providing ‘choice’ to low-income neighborhoods by playing dosey-do with the limited tax $ available is a thumb-on-the-scale game in which the powerless lose– just a microcosm of the greater inequity.
If we’re concerned with inequity, we’re going to have to examine equality of school funding for all students.
LikeLike
“Also in recent weeks, several school districts in Florida have moved to cut down on testing. Miami-Dade County cut 24 interim assessments, adding 260 minutes of instruction back into the schedule, while Palm Beach County cut 11 diagnostic tests and made all district-level performance assessments optional. Moreover, Hillsborough County school district leaders are calling on the state to reduce the amount of testing in schools while several school officials have already eliminated final exams at middle and high school levels, as well as reduced the number of assessments for elementary grades in math, science and language arts.”
The one and only reason “school districts” in Florida “moved” is parents and teachers went into open rebellion on the idiotic number of tests their kids were taking. In fact, the teachers rebelled at SOME RISK to their jobs.
I love how we’re now going to pretend this occurred because someone in ed reform said “gosh but we’re testing these kids a lot!”. They said nothing. I think they’d STILL be adding tests if they hadn’t been shouted down.
The rap on the parents and teachers who objected to all this testing was they were somehow “coddled” and self-interested -escaping accountability! They were basically insulted and then dismissed when this started. No one listened to them until they got to numerous and loud to ignore.
LikeLike
I have no problem allowing ed-reformers to save face. More power to Duncan, in what may be his first smart move, for beginning to rein in the excesses of the storm he unleashed, if it provides a path back toward sanity. The lesson to be learned from FL is that voters DO have power– tho please note, ONLY if they have locally elected school boards thro which to express their opinions (being that both parties support privatization, from whence the plethora of tests).
The big nut to crack is the fed-funded, state-run inner cities. Their elected school boards (if they have them) have no power. Their citizens understandably seek any alternative to violent &/or rat-infested local schools.
Newark seems a good place to start. Tho run by the state for 20 yrs, NJ’s funding formula brought hi per-pupil income, & some schools were making good headway. Enter Christie & hi-handed policies calculated to turn it all to charters. There is a serious groundswell of opposition, enough to have elected a mayor w/opposite philosophy to [now-Sen.] Booker.
LikeLike
Regarding:
“Stop the machine that produces the data that are used to label your children, to fire his teachers, to close his school. Take away the data and insist that teachers deal with the needs of every child. Do not feed the machine built in D.C. or at Pearson.”
I have a picture on my desk of Woody Guthrie playing his guitar. On his guitar is a sign that reads: “This Machine Kills Fascists”.
LikeLike
For some context, the original postingis here:
The full “this too shall pass” exchange, is here:
2old2teac
As far as I can see, there soon will be absolutely no reason to become a teacher. Who in their right mind will obtain their teaching credentials in the current climate? I think it is just an underhanded way to eliminate teaching as a profession. Can they seriously believe that they will be able to find enough cannon fodder to even pretend to staff schools adequately? Do they really believe their own idiocy?
Reply
NY Teacher
November 26, 2014 at 10:25 pm
I understand your pessimism, but this too shall pass. The Obama/Duncan regime are closing up shop soon. Their policy attacks are simply not scalable nor will they withstand the legal challenges that are sure to follow. The teaching profession will survive this onslaught and one day Arne, RTT, CC, VAM, and the test-and-punish reform will be smoldering on the ash heap of failed and discredited ideas.
Reply
susannunes
November 26, 2014 at 11:02 pm
The problem is both political parties are in bed with privatizer interests. The WORST thing educators can do is think this is a “fad” that will “pass,” and the “pendulum will swing the other way.” You are totally ignoring the neoliberal juggernaut that wants to privatize ALL of the public sector–worldwide–for private gain.
NY Teacher
November 26, 2014 at 11:24 pm
I am not ignoring the neoliberal pet dream of privatizing public education. But that’s all it will ever be. They will make some inroads, as the inner city systems are most vulnerable. But even those will not last when their ROI fails to materialize. The day will never come when the majority of America’s schools are run by private, for profit corporations. Knowing that it is indeed a fad, the latest shiny thing for profiteers does not mean we sit back and wait for it to pass without resistance. Current times are dark, but pessimism is the worst attitude we can adopt.
LikeLike
“But even those will not last when their ROI fails to materialize.”
When that happens they will bundle the loser bonds into something unrecognizable & sell iit off to unsuspecting suckers (the public), depositing the profits in the Caymans. As far as I know, nothing has happened legislatively post-2007-8 to prevent that.
If only to prevent another huge economic downturn, we must fight privatization of public services on all fronts (USPS, transportation, education, et al). It’s just a game to squeeze profits from taxpayers while killing the services integral to a functioning economy. The game is about short-term profits for those who have other global options.
This cannabalistic process has nothing whatever to do with quality of education: we need to meet them on their own ground wherever we can. At the moment, that means opting out of all std tests; for those who have voter clout on school boards, rallying for the cause; finding & supporting candidates who are not part of the neolib-Dem/ Repub anti-funding-publec-goods platform. A vote for a sensible 3rd party sends a message.
LikeLike
“The last election–at the gubernatorial level–was frankly a disaster, with the re-election of Scott Walker in Wisconsin, John Kasich in Ohio, Rick Scott in Florida, Rick Snyder in Michigan, Paul LePage in Michigan, and others who support privatization.”
Please add to that list Dannell Malloy in Connecticut who infamously claimed that “teachers need only show up for four years and they’ll get tenure.”
LikeLike
Diane – A small correction: Paul LePage was re-elected governor in Maine, not Michigan (though, speaking as a New Englander, Michigan would make more sense).
LikeLike
The Florida Schools Boards Association has decided to stand up to overcasting but they have declined to call for ‘opting out’ because they say it is an easy out for the legislature and will only benefit some children.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/education/k12/florida-school-boards-take-a-stand-against-over-testing/2208695
We were warned by the FEA not to participate in opting out activities or talk because we would be at risk of being fired due to a new law passed by the legislature. I’m not sure what advice could be given for us in Florida to fight back when an ALEC law specifically designed to silence us was passed without opposition.
Here is the text of the FEA email in its entirety, which was sent out on September 18, 2014:
“Dear Colleague:
As educators, we know that the idea of all children moving through school at exactly the same pace, under the tutelage of the perfect teacher and performing equally well on the exact same tests might be convenient for adults, but it has little to do with how our children actually learn.
Sadly, what is convenient for adults rather than what is best for students has become the guiding principle for almost every education “reform” in Florida. Education experts know this is not sound practice. Teachers know it is not sound practice. Parents know it is not good for their children. And it must STOP.
In recent weeks, frustration among parents, teachers and students has boiled over.
On August 27, parents in Lee County succeeded in pressuring their school board to pass a motion to opt the district out of all statewide standardized tests.
The reaction to the Lee County action from those heavily invested in high stakes testing was swift and the potential penalties stunningly severe: high school students might not be allowed to graduate, state funding including lottery funds and school recognition money might be withheld. It has even been suggested that teachers who talk to students and/or parents about the opt-out controversy might be targeted for sanctions from the state against their teaching certificate
.
The Lee County School Board called an emergency meeting and rescinded their vote just six days later.
Earlier this month, a Gainesville kindergarten teacher risked losing her job by saying she would not administer new state tests to her young students. She had the backing of her administrators and school board. Coincidentally, this week the state DOE suspended the FAIR test for this year, citing technical difficulties, rather than the growing opposition to testing.
This debate must continue and educators must speak out. But the threat of retribution is real. School employees – particularly teachers who hold professional certificates — must be aware of the difference between advocating for policy change and encouraging disregard for current statute.
Below is a Q&A that should be helpful in the coming weeks.
Questions and Answers about Opting Out of Standardized Testing
I am hearing parents, teachers and even some students talk about opting out of state standardized tests and local assessment tests … is that even possible?
Currently, there is no legal process for a parent or student to opt out of testing in Florida.
Our school’s open house is coming up. What should I tell parents who ask me about opting their child out of standardized tests?
As a teacher, you need to know that you have a professional and ethical obligation to uphold district policy and state law. Therefore, you should not encourage students and/or parents to opt out of any mandatory test because that action MAY lead to sanctions from the state against your certificate and/or discipline by the district. Parents should be directed to the principal, the district superintendent and/or school board members as the ones who set and implement district policy.
Wow. Don’t I have the right to voice my professional or personal opinion on this issue?
Gagging teachers is one of the many direct and intended consequences of Senate Bill 736, the very first bill signed by Gov. Rick Scott. Teachers can no longer speak out in the best interest of students or for themselves. Teacher evaluations are affected and job security can be threatened if teachers do not implement current policies … even those widely recognized as educationally unsound. The most effective and highly effective annual contract teachers can be released for any reason or for no reason at all.
So what can we, as education professionals, do to fix this misguided system? Our students are being subjected to toxic levels of testing and cheated out of an education!
There is little disagreement that Florida’s so-called accountability system has gone horribly wrong. Florida’s use of testing must change, but we must follow the rules and work within the system. Many education stakeholders, including FEA, are calling on Gov. Rick Scott and the State Board of Education to immediately stop using standardized testing for any purpose other than as a diagnostic tool. Until standardized testing is again focused on teaching and learning, Florida should adopt a comprehensive opt-out policy that allows parents the choice to have their children excused without penalty from participating in statewide standardized or state required assessments.
What can I tell friends and family who are concerned about their children and the future of our public schools? What can they do to help?
Florida voters must hit the reset button on education reform by turning out and voting out those who are responsible for what one newspaper has dubbed, “an incomprehensible mess.”
Sincerely,
Andy Ford
President, Florida Education Association”
I’m for whatever works myself. My job has become near to impossible to tolerate and my colleagues and I are frequently ill and just fighting to survive at this point.
LikeLike
A professional and ethical obligation to uphold district policy and state law – I love it, love it, love it! As a teacher am I to have no moral compass and no conscience? I was recently told by my union that I am to do as I am told and avoid being insubordinate. It is good to know that Florida and New Jersey are on the same page Chris.
LikeLike
Chris I hear you, there is a state law in place which is [unconstitutional? I think so]. Nothing for it but to get ACLU on board & test the law. NJ Teacher, say it ain’t so! That’s my [still kinda blue, no?] state! I’m guessing what your union told you is SO illegal.
LikeLike
Thank you for spreading the opt out message!
I am a public school parent and have asked our principal to compile a list of all standardized assessments at our elementary school. I am going to try to find out exactly how much time and money is going toward this in order to encourage my fellow parents to opt out. I am also going to ask the teachers which, if any, of the standardized assessments they find valuable to help inform them about each child’s education.
LikeLike
This might be a good strategy for teachers to employ. Instead of saying “negative” things about testing, teachers could compile a list of tests they find to be helpful in their classroom practice. Hard to charge someone with insubordination for being positive, even if the “helpful testing” is a null set.
LikeLike
I really like this idea. Let me try out a new slogan:
“New York Teachers Present Our Inventory of Standardized, Common Core Aligned Assessments That Are Valid and Reliable, and That Promote and Support Authentic Instruction and Meaningful Student Outcomes:
ZERO, ZILCH, NADA, NONE, NIL, 00.000”
Kind of catchy, no?
LikeLike
Kudos to you, Mamajj! We need one of you in every school district!
LikeLike
WWII should have taught us: When good people do nothing, terrible things happen.
LikeLike
Gordon Wilder: perhaps we should recall that—
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” [Edmund Burke]
And to not even speak up—is that a neutral position?
Here’s where an old dead Greek guy comes in handy:
“Your silence gives consent.” [Plato]
And some homegrown talent reminds us what going along to get along means:
“The opposite for courage is not cowardice, it is conformity. Even a dead fish can go with the flow.” [Jim Hightower]
😎
LikeLike
Privatization is just a way for well connected to tap gov’t programs for profits. To wit: school testing materials companies with Neil Bush as one of the owners; Iraq war as make-work for Cheney’s Halliburton; and now school privatization supposedly improving education which has not been demonstrated. (also don’t forget attempts to privatize soc sec and Medicare).
It seems this rt wing strategy began by first preaching hatred of government with Reagan’s 1981 quote “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem” a theme lasting for a generation with a constant drumbeat of gov’t hatred, gov’t bad, etc. Since then— this belief that “gov’t is the problem” has inflamed ill-informed voters to believe privatization is the path to improving public education—this was the cultural foundation needed to set up their strategic goals of tapping the public treasury for personal profits.
With this mind-set in place—the rt wing drumbeat of hatred of gov’t in place— the well-connected began surreptitious programs to tap the public education money for their personal profits. Testing, testing, testing and charter schools that your readers know so well.
So what to do?
First educating the public that personal profits is the real aims of the public education destruction crowd under the guise of improving education. ( I wonder how it could be better if the edu budget is cut 10% to provide their profit goals? Some charter school leaders make up to $500,000 / year as you know).
Second fight on all fronts like the way the U.S. won WWII.
In sum;
1) get the word out and 2) fight, fight, fight for a free pubic education for every child.
Perhaps Churchill’s words can be translated into the fight for public education which reflects my feeling about the need and importance of educating every child as our most important national resource— especially given the 21st Century globally connected information age now at it’s beginnings: (readers can make their own translations which can provide interesting follow-on conversations to save public education)
“We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender,
Garth
LikeLike
Diane, Would be great if you could add Wisconsin Teachers Unions to honor roll for sticking together to protect public education. You are loved, admired, and inspire us!
educationhttp://host.madison.com/ct/news/opinion/editorial/school-unions-vital-defenders-of-public-education/article_8937ca68-81f5-5ab2-a806-3660964e5621.html
LikeLike
Am I really that fearful and passive about my job not to take a stand?
Would I treat my students this way? Bullying and threatening them if they dare speak out against my own asinine and unconscionable actions in the classroom?
Because that’s exactly what’s happening here.
I’m to the point that I don’t want a seat at the table. I want to flip it over.
I don’t want to speak out against this bullshit. I want to shout it in someone’s face.
I don’t want to be fearful or stand in silence for my job. I want to dare someone to threaten my livelihood.
I want to take this job back so as to actually be able to do it.
Is that militantism? Then fire me.
Fire everybody.
Question Authority | Start a Movement
LikeLike
Right on. Let us not forget that a generation of ‘coddled’ college students put the kibosh on LBJ’s re-election campaign, got the vote peeled back from age 21 to 18 (draft age), & ultimately shut down Nixon’s presidency & the war itself. Votes count.
I am occasionally shocked at the complacency I read on this forum– woe is me, there’s nothing I can do– but more surprisingly, on article-threads dominated by right-wing [ordinary] citizens, I increasingly find– right along with the knee-jerk anti-union soundbies– a cynical, passive POV which amounts to ‘you can’t fight city hall’. Perhaps what it takes is a life-or-death struggle [as in college grads facing being drafted to army privates in a brutal, losing war], & perhaps blacks will get there before whites (in view of Ferguson, Garner & Rice), but poor whites can’t be too far behind.
Teachers should be leading the charge.
LikeLike
De acuerdo, compañero. He estado diciendo esto por años. Casi nadie me ha escuchado. Es que la mayoría son unos imbeciles pero peor son cobardes que les faltan los cojones.
LikeLike
So if surgeons were forced by an outside group of wealthy medical reformers to use a new and untested procedure that harmed their patients, it would be an ethical breach for them to speak out against it?
LikeLike
Of course it would!
“I mean, I mean if fifty people a day. . . .!”
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Centerville United for Responsible Education.
LikeLike
Resistance comes with simple acts. I was told I would be proctoring this spring’s all junior ACT test. I asked if I was allowed to read the entire test before giving it (knowing full well what the answer would be) and was told that no I could not. I told her that I cannot ethically give a test which I haven’t read. She is finding someone else–until she tells the principal about it and they will attempt to force me to do it and I won’t.
LikeLike
You’ve got a lot more fire in the belly than most people, Duane.
LikeLike
Probably because I’m close enough to retirement now that when (notice I didn’t say if as there is still a lot more nonsense they want us to do that I’m refusing to do) they do I won’t be totally economically devastated, just 50%.
Or it’s probably more like a lot of cold and flu medicine these past days than anything. I’ve been out since I told them that I’m not giving it and fully expect to be reprimanded tomorrow (if I go in as I still feel like a piece of caca). Oh, well, what’s another letter in the file.
But if all were to do small simple aggravating, death of a thousand cuts actions, well, the edudeformer beast would finally bleed to death.
LikeLike
And I’m not referring to the moonshine.
LikeLike
Cherry Bounce will put that kind of fire in one’s belly. From my reading the recipe goes all the way back to before Martha Washington who supposedly made it (although I can’t find a recipe in a recently acquired MW Cook Book.)
LikeLike
I’d love to see more guidance on opting out in Ohio. Parents in my area are being told third graders opted out of the reading test will be held back under the state’s third grade guarantee. Our local officials say you -can’t- opt out, and if you keep your kids home they’ll test then as soon as they return to school. We already pulled one child out of public schools, for reasons relating to the effect the testing was having on curriculum, and are about at that point with our younger son. As an informed parent, it’s incredibly frustrating.
LikeLike
dtnmommy, it is all about organization and the power of numbers. If all or 80% of the kids opt out, no one will be held back. If you do it alone with a few other parents, yes, you will suffer the consequences. There are no consequences for mass action. And it sends a powerful message.
LikeLike
I have agreed w/the current push to opt-out/test refuse, & I did that in Aug.2014, after over a year of research. I am now on a 15 week ordeal, both my babies (kinder+2nd gr) have been standardized tested explicity against my direct formal, in writing parental direction. I’ve been written in the newspaper 4X, joined my local Bats, meet politicians for change, contacted the Thomas More Law Center, because my children’s school district have ignored my parental rights, believe me the bullying, harassment, push-back is REAL!
LikeLike
Just to be clear, Finland, constantly praised here and elsewhere, gives teachers the chance to create new public schools that are options for families and for the educators. Finland has been widely praised for a variety of reasons, initially by many because they were doing so well on international tests (which are not the only valid measure).
Both Massachusetts and Minnesota, which have various forms of public school choice, have done better than Finland on recent international tests. Choice isn’t the only reason, but it has helped some students do better.
I realize that having options in Finland is not what many want to describe, but it is a part of what’s happening there, along with many other good things.
LikeLike
Joe Nathan, just to be clear, Finland has no charter schools and no vouchers. All schools are public schools. Finland has no Teach for Finland. No one becomes a teacher without five years of education in a highly selective college of education. Finland has no standardized testing until the end of high school. There are no hedge fund managers trying to take control of education in Finland. It has national standards but they are not as prescriptive as Common Core. Teachers have wide autonomy over how and what they teach. Unlike the US, teachers are held in high esteem and are viewed as professionals. No one would dream of allowing celebrities, entrepreneurs athletes, and hedge fund managers to open schools and call them “public.” Finland has nothing remotely comparable to the charter schools that you promote.
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch,
Just to be clear, Finland does give educators the chance to create new, distinctive public schools from which families can select. There are not precisely the same as charters that are part of the public sector in more than 40 states, but have some similarities. Finland also funds k-12 schools that are associated with churches. I wouldn’t suggest that the US do this, but that is part of the education scene in Finland.
As noted, we can learn from Finland, which has some good ideas, and from some successes in the US. Both Mass and Mn, which include charters, public support for early childhood education, and testing programs (plus many other features), have done better as well or better on the International Exams that helped bring lots of attention to FInland.
LikeLike
Joe Nathan, just to be clear, there is not a single public school in Finland that is run by hedge fund managers, corporate chains, the Gulen movement, entrepreneurs, tennis stars or other celebrities. The teacher-run schools do not pay their executives $500,000. They are not run for profit. They do not compete with public schools. They take the same children as the public schools. They don’t boast about their test scores. They don’t hire college graduates with five weeks of training. The teachers belong to the same union as other teachers in Finland. The teachers and principals in Finland almost all belong to the same union. The teacher-run schools have nothing in common with the corporate chains that run charters in the US.
LikeLike
So we agree that Finland has schools of choice created by teachers, some of which are associated with various churches. We also agree that none of the schools are run by for-profit groups.
LikeLike
Are TE and Joe twins?
LikeLike
Can’t say about TE but our 3 kids all attended and graduated from urban public schools. Our 3 kids all have worked in urban public schools. I worked in urban public schools and my wife just retired after 33 years as an urban public school teacher. And I’m a fan of accurate descriptions.
LikeLike
Beyond posting here, some teachers are promoting teacher led district and/or charter public schools: http://www.educationevolving.org/newsletters/teacher-led-schools-idea-hits-national-media
There are very exciting developments with teacher empowerment around the country.
LikeLike
Just another idea about Opting Out.
Many parents are afraid of their children being harassed and harmed by administrative backlash in schools, rather than dealing with parents directly. Fully understandable and outrageous conduct by admins.
When I was teaching high school students who were labeled EB/D and they did not see their way out of making up failed credits, marked their time until age 16, and refused to do classsork, homework or take any test…ever. Never carried pencils, pens, paper or books. Traveled very light, slept in class and snuck out after 11:30 AM (got full attendance credit).
My job was cut out for me to offer hope and connect education to their future. But, that did not stop me & every now and then we got lucky. Miss those kids! Those were the kids I chose to teach.
Here is my idea: my guys(all boys) usually cooperated in taking standardized tests by ONLY bubbling in ALL ANSWERS with the Letter ‘C’. The entire test! Rushed through it. Done! Closed booklets & put their heads in their desks until the end of allotted time.
Hmmmmm!?
LikeLike
Hurley – The problem with your idea is 1) the cut scores in Louisiana have been set so low that it is possible to guess and get a better score than actually trying. We have a casein Louisiana of a special needs child who was forced to take the test and passed because he bubbled in all the same letter. 2). If the students takes the test your way and fails, the score will be counted and recorded on his permanent record. These people don’t care about the students. They only want their tests taken to be used as a weapon. My theory is that politics or hoping for officials to be elected to stop reform will not work primarily because too many people who vote don’t have a clue and the others don’t vote. Just as the only guaranteed effective birth control is abstinence, the only guaranteed method to prevent testing is obstinence. It is a parent’s responsibility when he/she knows the child is being hurt to intervene and not allow that hurt. When sufficient numbers of parents opt out that the scores cannot be adjusted to compensate, the testing will stop.
LikeLike
[…] https://dianeravitch.net/2014/12/03/how-to-survive-and-prevail-in-this-era-of-greed-and-privatizatio… […]
LikeLike