Only days before the election, enjoying a comfortable lead in the polls, Néw York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo unleashed a tirade against teachers and the very concept of public education. He vowed to make test-based evaluations tougher, so more teachers would be found ineffective and fired. And he denounced public education as a monopoly that he is determined to break.
Daniel S. Katz of Seton Hall University reviews Cuomo’s remarks and finds that he is dangerously misinformed. He is a threat to the future of public education in Néw York state. He is clearly unaware of the failure of test-based teacher evaluation. He has obviously never read the research that shows how this method produces incoherent results and is no better than a roll of the dice.
But even more disturbing is his hostility to public education, which is one of the bedrock responsibilities of society. He sounds like a right-wing ideologue in a voucher organization.
It is sad that this angry man, who views teachers and public schools with contempt, has collected $40 million from his Wall Street allies and is coasting to re-election. Too bad he did not make his views clear earlier in the election cycle.

Cuomo has entered the land of the demagogue. This is dangerous business and and Fascistic at its core.Those who support Cuomo’s anti democratic educational policies are as bad as he is. They need to be publicly slammed and sent back toxic holes. If this is not the time to vote for the third party candidate, then when?
LikeLike
Andrew Cuomo (?) bust at 0:26?
LikeLike
elaborate. clarify. please.
LikeLike
Cuomo’s beliefs are bad enough for New Yorkers, but his position as the governor of this visible and influential state and his links to Wall St. give his views exposure far beyond it’s borders.
He is a prime example of a democratic party politician who has turned away from the needs of the people that it has traditionally represented.
Very disappointing.
LikeLike
Also sad that the unions are not vocal in condeming his views.
He is a DINO-democrat in name only who needs to be called out as hell-bent on destroying public institutions as if all of these were no more than unexploited private assets.
By his own logic he is not obliged to represent the people of NY state,only those who have bought and paid for him to hold office.
LikeLike
Diane,
Can you explain Randi Weingarten’s reaction to Cuomo’s remarks? I can’t understand why her reaction was so measured.
LikeLike
I was enraged by Cuomo’s remarks. I can’t explain anyone else’s reaction. I know that Randi has spent the last month traipsing across the country to try to help Democratic candidates, especially in Senate races. I also know she tweeted her thanks to Rob Astorino for his comments supporting teachers after Cuomo’s rant. I assume she prefers. Cuomo to Astorino and hopes for the best. We don’t agree. I am voting for the Green Party as a protest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would do the same, except I am concerned that if too many of us do that, we will end up with Astorino!
LikeLike
You want the low-down on Weingarten? Here it from the Perdido Street School blog:
How Randi Weingarten And Other Union Leaders Help Andrew Cuomo Bring The “Death Penalty” To New York’s Public School System
Vote NO On Cuomo’s Smart Schools Bond Act
Cowardly Cuomo Refuses To Own Up To Working Families Party Slam
How Randi Weingarten And Other Union Leaders Help Andrew Cuomo Bring The “Death Penalty” To New York’s Public School System
Posted: 02 Nov 2014 07:50 AM PST
Last year, Andrew Cuomo promised to bring the “death penalty” to “failing schools.”
This year, Andrew Cuomo has called the public school system a “monopoly” which he plans to “break” in his second term.
Cuomo doesn’t seem to like teachers any more than he seems to like public schools.
Cuomo has promoted a punitive teacher evaluation system that superintendents in the Lower Hudson Valley have said is a disaster that needs to be changed as soon as possible as one of the best in the nation.
Last month, Cuomo said that teacher evaluation system needs to be revised because too many teachers are being rated “effective” or “highly effective” with it.
Last week, a highly-respected 17 year teaching veteran filed suit against the NYSED commissioner after she was rated “ineffective” in this system as a result of her students’ test scores – even though her students’ test scores were high in comparison with other students’ scores around the state.
Last week, Cuomo promised to make the teacher evaluation system that rated a highly respected teacher “ineffective” even more punitive by adding “real sanctions” to it.
Last week, AFT President Randi Weingarten defended Cuomo’s “monopoly” comments by saying they were “campaign rhetoric.”
Cuomo made these comments twice – he doubled down after the Daily News first reported them – so the comments seem less like “campaign rhetoric,” more like campaign promises.
Yet Randi was running interference for Cuomo even as she was also mounting a symbolic battle against TIME Magazine over a cover they ran about teacher tenure.
This wasn’t the first time Randi Weingarten helped out her buddy Andy during the election cycle.
Back in the spring, Weingarten, along with UFT President Michael Mulgrew, engineered a putsch within the NYSUT to toss out the old NYSUT leadership when it started to show guts and take on Cuomo over issues and replace them with a more Cuomo-compliant leadership.
Also last spring, union leaders put pressure on the Working Families Party to endorse Andrew Cuomo over Fordham President Zephyr Teachout when they threatened the party with dissolution and financial ruin if Teachout were given the party’s ballot line.
You can be sure the UFT was not part of that pressure on WFP without Weingarten’s okay.
This September, when internal polling showed Teachout’s running mate, Tim Wu, with a real shot to beat Cuomo’s banker lobbyist running mate, Kathy Hochul, in the primary, Weingarten joined NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio in making robocalls for Cuomo’s running mate, Hochul.
Hochul won her primary – Wu said the momentum in the campaign turned against him when the robocalls started.
This morning on Twitter, Randi Weingarten defended her defense of Andrew Cuomo’s comments, saying she had criticized him and what more could she be expected to do?
Well, what she has done is quite clear – and quite helpful to Andrew Cuomo.
To reiterate:
She helped engineer a putsch against the old NYSUT leadership and helped install a new, Cuomo-compliant leadership at NYSUT.
She helped other union leaders push for a Working Families Party endorsement for Andrew Cuomo, a huge thing that meant Cuomo wouldn’t have to worry about a third party candidate from the left during the general election (and multiple polls had shown Cuomo losing a lot of support if that happened.)
She made robocalls for Cuomo’s bank lobbyist running mate when it looked like she might lose and helped the bankster lobbyist win her primary.
And now she defends Cuomo’s plan to “break” public schools by calling the comments (which he made twice) “campaign rhetoric.”
As I noted above, Cuomo has promised to bring the “death penalty” to schools he considers “failing” – and from comments he made this week, he seems to think the entire public school system around the state is failing.
When Cuomo “breaks” the school system, when he takes a sledgehammer to the public schools and gives them the “death penalty,” that sledgehammer will have the fingerprints of AFT President Randi Weingarten on it.
Vote NO On Cuomo’s Smart Schools Bond Act
Posted: 02 Nov 2014 05:18 AM PST
Gary Stern at LoHud does a great job of giving both sides of the Smart Schools Bond Act story.
Here’s why critics are opposed to Cuomo’s technology bond for schools:
Opponents of the bond act say that borrowing $2 billion to pay for computers and other items with limited life spans would be an unprecedented move that has not been supported by analysis.
Nicholas Tampio of Mamaroneck, an associate professor of political science at Fordham University who has tried to incite opposition to the bond act, said money from the bond act will ultimately tie districts to the state’s agenda. The state Education Department’s goal, he said, is for districts to prepare for online tests aligned to the Common Core.
“School districts face a choice: Submit investment plans that (state Education Commissioner) John King wants or relinquish any chance of having the plan approved,” Tampio said. “And what John King wants is the technological infrastructure to support online Common Core testing.”
If the bond act is approved, each district would be eligible to receive a set amount based on the state’s aid formula. But districts would need to have spending plans approved by a high-powered review board consisting of King, SUNY Chancellor Nancy Zimpher and state Budget Director Robert Megna.
And:
E.J. McMahon, president of the Empire Center, a conservative think tank in Albany, has been the most prominent critic of the bond act. He said Cuomo has no research that proves New York needs to borrow $2 billion for school tech.
“There was no assessment of need and no one asked for this,” he said. “This is the most ill-conceived and wasteful bond act to be put in front of New York voters in 30 or 40 years.”
He noted that the state Board of Regents, which sets educational policy, has not endorsed the bond act.
“The governor treats the need for this as self-evident: Tech is good,” McMahon said.
Why in the world would anybody want to vote for a $2 billion dollar boondoggle bond act that gives John King and Nancy Zimpher the right to approve or reject what districts do with the money?
You can be sure King and Zimpher, staunch Common Core proponents and testing advocates, will want every district to use the money for infrastructure for the PARCC (or some other online tests) to grade students, rate teachers and evaluate schools.
We ought to call this the Infrastructure For Online Computerized Testing Bond Act, because that’s exactly what it is.
Don’t be fooled, thinking much (or any, for that matter) of this money will go to building schools or getting rid of trailers in the city schools.
This is tech bond, pure and simple, meant to get the state up and running for the coming online PARCC tests.
Vote NO on the Proposition 3 on Tuesday.
Cowardly Cuomo Refuses To Own Up To Working Families Party Slam
Posted: 01 Nov 2014 05:48 PM PDT
Typical from Governor Narcissist – say something scummy, then make believe he didn’t say it:
Gov. Andrew Cuomo today denied identifying the labor-backed Working Families Party as a “fringe” party, despite radio remarks yesterday that seemed to mock and belittle the left-leaning group.
On a Friday interview on the Brian Lehrer Show, Mr. Cuomo seemed to allude to the WFP–with which he has long had a fractious relationship, and which reluctantly endorsed him twice for governor–as a “fringe” party, while pushing the Women’s Equality Party, which he created this year. The WEP purports to promote the anti-discrimination, pro-choice Women’s Equality Agenda, but many critics view it as an effort to lure progressives away from the WFP and deny it the 50,000 votes it needs to keep its ballot line.
“The Women’s Equality Party, the Women’s Equality Agenda, is something that is very important to me. I think it can be a national precedent. And it empowers women in a way that’s never been done. It’s almost amazing when you think about it. We’ve formed every kind of fringe party for every kind of reason. We have Democrat, Republican, Green, Red, White, Blue, Working People, Working Short People, Working Tall People,” Mr. Cuomo said yesterday.
But following a rally in the Bronx today with 1199 SEIU, 32BJ SEIU and the Hotel Trades Council–all components of the WFP’s union-community group alliance –“I don’t think I called them a ‘fringe party,’” Mr. Cuomo said, then clarifying his remarks when the Observer quoted his words from yesterday to him. “I think that I said there are a number of parties, you can vote for me on the Democratic Party, you can vote for me on the Independence Party, you can vote for me on the Working Families Party, you can vote for me on the Women’s Equality Party.”
Clearly he was tweaking WFP yesterday with the “We have Democrat, Republican, Green, Red, White, Blue, Working People, Working Short People, Working Tall People” comment on Lehrer’s show.
Too bad he didn’t have the guts to admit it in front of working people from 1199 SEIU, 32BJ SEIU and the Hotel Trades Council who were rallying for him.
Too bad the working people from 1199 SEIU, 32BJ SEIU and the Hotel Trades Council who were rallying for him don’t realize what an arrogant, anti-union prick he is.
LikeLike
What do NYSUT and Randi get out of not calling Cuomo out??
Are they afraid of him??
LikeLike
Maybe Mulgrew or Magee thinks they’ll be appointed to Cuomo’s cabinet as the next Arne?
LikeLike
Too bad Teachout is not on the ballot.
LikeLike
My suspicion is this is a form of “you have to have a seat at the table” thinking. With Christie and Walker there is no chair to sit at. Trouble is that Cuomo only lets you sit so he can shoot you under the table. Time to walk away regardless of party. Democrats need to learn.
LikeLike
I can’t vote for Cuomo and voting Green Party is a cop out.
I hate not having a good choice.
LikeLike
Hi First Grade Teacher,
I voted for Cuomo the first time he ran. He has not stood up for education,. I cannot and will not vote for Cuomo or Astorino. I really thought Teachout had a good chance of winning. Unfortunately, most of the people I spoke to could not vote for her because they were not registered Democrats.
You are right, we do not have a good choice in NY. However, I always vote. I encourage my students to vote (even though most think it is useless). I will be voicing my opinion this year by voting for the Green Party. I will be helping to deny Cuomo his chances to obtain an above 60% win in NY. I hope to stop him from considering a national run.
Voting Green is not a cop out – it is a choice. I hope it will make the Democrats listen to us, the voters.
LikeLike
Yes, it will make the democrats listen to us!
It’s all marketing, isn’t it?
I think you make an excellent point. All votes make a statement. Non-votes are almost always the worst choice to make.
LikeLike
Isn’t it interesting how a Democrat Governor in NY can act so like a Republican Governor in OH?
LikeLike
no, not interesting. enraging.
LikeLike
I meant “interesting”…
LikeLike
Voting as a protest is not a vote.
LikeLike
I respectfully disagree.
LikeLike
Cross-posted http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Daniel-S-Katz-Cuomo-Decl-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Cuomo_Diane-Ravitch_Education_Evaluation-141102-46.html#comment518084 with this comment
I was there in 1998, and my experience makes the lIE apparent. At the top of my career, and in fact The NYS English Council’s Educator of Excellence, and the cohort for the Nationals Standards research in NYC, with my students at the top of all city exams, I was charged with incompetence, as my salary reachers longevity.
They silenced my voice because there is no way I would replace a curricula developed of decades, in my successful practice, with anti learning stuff, mandated my a businessman.
Cuomo is a corrupt ideologue and will end public education in NY State. Period.
LikeLike
First grade teacher,
So, you are happy to not vote and not send a message because you agree with Cuomo that the public school monopoly should be broken. That is the message you send if you don’t vote, no matter what your philosophy is. I hope you have another career planned, because Cuomo is gunning for every public school teacher in NYS, including you. And remember, these teachers all need masters’s degrees to teach in those “awful” public schools. But maybe you are a charter school teacher and independently wealthy. Words have consequences. At least Andrew’s do.
LikeLike
You misread my comment. I will vote and it will not be for Cuomo. I’m shocked at how he had been allowed to attack public education. Voting is the duty of all of us. I was simply expressing my frustration with the choice.
LikeLike