Carl Cohn is one of the most respected and wisest figures in American education today. He was a successful superintendent in Long Beach and San Diego. He currently is a member of the California State Board of Education.
He writes here about the flawed logic of the Vergara decision, in which the judge ruled that teacher tenure and seniority were unconstitutional in California.
Cohn says the decision contradicts the reality of schools today, as well as what he observed as a superintendent.
He writes:
“What’s wrong with the ruling is that it reinforces a completely false narrative in which incompetent teachers are portrayed as the central problem facing urban schools.
“Serving as superintendent in both Long Beach and San Diego for 12-plus years, I didn’t see the “teacher jails” or “rubber rooms” – the places where teachers are assigned and do nothing while any of a range of charges against them are adjudicated – that have become a part of the popular-media-driven narrative about urban schools and districts.
“I saw remarkably heroic classroom teachers who delivered high-quality instruction on a daily basis. Sure, there were times when a teacher wasn’t performing up to par and needed help. And yes, there were times when a teacher needed to find a new career. But the notion that the only choice facing an urban district is to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars removing such teachers says more about poor leadership and poor human capital management in that district than it does about the existing state statutes under consideration in this court case.
“In my experience at Long Beach, the biggest help in counseling a teacher toward finding a new career was the head of the local teachers union, who understood that keeping a sub-par teacher in the profession was bad for both the district and the union. Most of the heavy lifting on getting that resignation was done by the union, not the district.
“In recent years, it has become fashionable to suggest that the battle in urban districts is all about adult interests versus the interests of schoolchildren. The truth is that an effective leader of an urban school system goes to work every day trying to figure out how best to motivate, inspire and develop the adults who work with kids. Those superintendents who feel that they can transform kids’ lives by fiat from the superintendent’s suite are kidding themselves and fooling the public. Enlisting, engaging and collaborating with classroom teachers are the only ways to genuinely move the needle on student achievement.”
He adds:
“Some change may well need to be considered in the length of time teachers must serve before gaining tenure. Most observers are waiting for some grand bargain to be crafted at the state level. But I think this would be best done from the “bottom up” in urban districts like San Jose and others, where district and union leaders are coming to the same conclusion that some beginning teachers are better served by lengthening the probationary period. State leaders and CTA need to get out of the way and let this happen.
“The work of improving urban schools is a long, hard slog. It requires stability of leadership and governance, along with taking the time to develop mutual trust between administrators and unions on building the capacity of the vast majority of the teacher workforce. Unfortunately, there are no shortcuts.
“California is a great state that should never consider turning back the clock either on the civil rights of urban students, who have the right to a high-quality public school education, or on the employment rights of the dedicated teachers who I saw serving them so well in both Long Beach and San Diego.”
This cheered me up and made my day. Bravo! I nominate Carl Cohn to your Supers Hall of Fame if he isn’t already there. I would also love to see this letter recorded and played in all school district offices and schools across the nation. Lastly, it should be sent to all those “School/Civil Rights Reform organizations”. Wait, they won’t listen to it. How about a giant screen broadcasting either sound or video on an endless loop in front of or next to their fancy digs?
I think reconsidering the length of time teachers must serve before gaining tenure is a good one. –Mike Woods
Cross posted at http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Carl-Cohn-What-s-Wrong-wi-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Choice_Diane-Ravitch_Logic_Management-141008-173.html with this comment taken from the piece:
MY take-away: “THE TRUTH:
“In recent years, it has become fashionable to suggest that the battle in urban districts is all about adult interests versus the interests of schoolchildren. The truth is that an effective leader of an urban school system goes to work every day trying to figure out how best to motivate, inspire and develop the adults who work with kids. Those superintendents who feel that they can transform kids’ lives by fiat from the superintendent’s suite are kidding themselves and fooling the public. Enlisting, engaging and collaborating with classroom teachers are the only ways to genuinely move the needle on student achievement.”
I was the union leader in the building in which I taught for most of my career for a number of years. While I totally insured that teachers got all the rights to which they were entitled, I also counseled out some who did not belong in the classroom and I ensured that the administration crossed its T’s and dotted its I’s when dismissal became necessary, as it did on a couple of occasions.
Right on point!! Would only add that your description of the “effective leader” as a collaborator and motivator applies equally well to superintendents (or for that matter principals) in urban and suburban school districts. .
Administrators have to be properly trained to be objective in evaluating teachers, especially probationary teachers and not base their decisions to non-reelect solely on the premise that they don’t like the teacher for any of the myriad reasons administrators chose to non-reelect. The truth is, IF, this continues, administrators will eventually end up in FEDERAL court for actions under color of law in violation of the U.S. Constitution (i.e., a Section 1983 lawsuit). In California, prior state and PERB administrative case law have given administrators the false impression that they can destroy the teaching careers of teachers they dislike, especially probationary teachers, but the truth is that the Vegara case has now opened the eyes of educators to be able to stand up against bad principals. You can easily recognize them too.
This was written in February 2014 before the decision… percient?
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/02/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html