I recently criticized PBS for ignoring the corporate assault on public education (with the exception of Bill Moyers), but the current airing of Ken Burns’ monumental series on “The Roosevelts” is television at its finest. We would not expect to see this seven-part, fourteen-hour series anywhere but on PBS. I sat glued to the television for seven straight nights. What struck me most forcefully was that the three great figures chronicled: Theodore, Franklin, and Eleanor–all felt a keen responsibility to stand up to the members of their own class and fight for the majority of Americans. Seeing this was a reminder that no one in high political office today is capable of defying the source of political campaign cash: Wall Street, the billionaires, and the big corporations.
No one has expressed these ideas better than this article by historian Joseph Palermo, which appeared on Huffington Post.
Palermo writes:
By exploring the lives and times of TR, FDR, and ER Burns shows that in our not-so-distant past the governing institutions of this country were actually responsive to the needs and desires of working-class Americans. This superb and moving portrait is a perfect fit for our times. The utter failure of our current “leaders” is glaring by comparison.
Yes, TR was a warmonger, and FDR signed the order that imprisoned innocent Japanese Americans. There are long lists of both presidents’ failures. But we shouldn’t let those flaws bury the fact that both TR and FDR were not afraid to stand up to big corporations and Wall Street if they viewed their actions as damaging to the country. That alone is probably the biggest difference between those leaders of the early decades of the 20th Century and today….
Over the past thirty years, Presidents and Congresses have become so subservient to corporations and Wall Street that the two major political parties are all but indistinguishable.
One of the reasons why our politics have become so volatile and opinion polls show over and over again that our people have nothing but contempt for the whole political class in Washington is the widespread recognition that the plutocrats, CEOs, and Wall Street bankers have effectively seized our governing institutions.
Another subtext for our times of the Burns documentary is the reminder that people who come from the richest .01 percent of Americans don’t have to be total assholes. Unlike the Koch Brothers, or the Waltons, or Representative Darrell Issa (the richest man in the House of Representatives) the Roosevelts didn’t feel they had a class interest in keeping their boots on the necks of America’s working people; they strived to uplift them.
And they saw the federal government not as a bazaar of accounts receivable to vacuum up precious tax dollars for the already rich but as a means to improve the lives of the 99 percent…
Today, when we see Democratic politicians like New York Governor Andrew Cuomo or Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel bludgeoning teachers’ unions while supping at the table of big campaign donors from Wall Street we’re left with the realization that working people have few reliable advocates for their class interests anymore….
Ironically, in the 1990s, when the Democratic Party grew more diverse based on race and gender, it shifted far closer to the Republicans in terms of class. We’ve seen one Democratic president (Bill Clinton) push NAFTA and other “free trade” deals that decimated labor unions; unravel the social safety net in the name of “welfare reform”; and deregulate Wall Street. And we’ve seen another Democratic president (Barack Obama) refuse to send any bankers to jail for the massive fraud they committed in the mortgage markets; choose to beat up teachers’ unions with Arne Duncan’s “Race to the Top”; and accommodate the profiteers inside our health care system.
All of these policies represent a capitulation to the interests of big corporations and Wall Street on the part of Democratic administrations at the expense of their own constituencies. The Burns documentary leaves one wondering what TR or FDR would do regarding these same policies. We’ll never know because history doesn’t work that way. But we can use our imaginations a little and recognize that compared to the responsiveness of the federal government during the Square Deal and New Deal eras, our current crop of “leaders” from both political parties have failed the majority of Americans and in doing so they’ve failed the country.
Another aspect of the Burns documentary is a revealing look at the kind of patriotism that TR, FDR, and ER exhibited throughout their lives. It was a patriotism that recognized that the country is strongest when all Americans had opportunities and the federal government not only helped to uplift them materially, but also protected them from the rapacious predators of the Wall Street ruling class.

One of Burn’s best. He painted the three of them in an honest way. None was perfect but they never lost sight of what they thought was best for humanity. Name one politician who’s name jumps out at you that would do that today.
LikeLike
There must be someone in Congress or state capitals who are willing to carry the Roosevelt progressive torch for the American people. What about Elizabeth Warren or Governor Paul LePage of Main?
LikeLike
Paul LePage…are you kidding?
LikeLike
I don’t know much about him. I quickly goggled “Governors against Common Core” and his name popped up in a news piece so I used it.
Can you suggest another governor as a better candidate for credit? There must be at least one—-hopefully.
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders.
LikeLike
Gov. Mark Dayton of Minnesota.
LikeLike
One more. Gov. Peter Shumlin, Vermont.
LikeLike
Chris Christie loves Common Core, public education, teachers, tenure and pensions.
LikeLike
I think people don’t want a progressive torch. If people were serious about wanting a progressive candidate, Dennis Kucinich would have done better in his presidential bids.
LikeLike
When I use the word progressive, I mean the same things that Teddy Roosevelt fought for to curb the power of the corporations and make life better for the working man.
Even the progressive term has been demonized by the far right along with the liberal term.
LikeLike
I think Dennis Kucinich meets your definition of a progressive. That’s why I believe people don’t want a progressive candidate. During every election cycle there are people who are progressive, why don’t they pick up momentum? If people truly wanted a progressive candidate, they should vote for them.
LikeLike
Concerned mom,
Look at the money. How much did the progressive candidates spend on their campaigns compared to the conservative candidates. From what I’ve read, more than 90 percent of the winners spent more money—in fact, on average $20 to every $1 the loser spent.
LikeLike
There is a reason that those Roosevelts did what they did to try to elevate the interests of the poor and of working people: they were truly afraid of what workers and the poor might do in rising up and overthrowing the established system that was brutally exploiting them. There was a very large and well-organized labor movement then, and quite a few socialist or communist groups doing a fair job of organizing workers for improvements in their daily lives and for other long-term ideals. Today, the left is in complete disarray (quite understandable, given what we see was the total hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of just about any self-proclaimed communist or socialist government anywhere in the world so far), and only a very small fraction of all workers even belong to a trade union. And very few of those members are active — even teachers, unfortunately.
But as Joe Hill is supposed to have written right before his death: “Dont’ mourn — organize!”
LikeLike
True, widespread poverty, hunger, and suffering are all fertile soil for the growth of socialism, communism and/or violent rebellion.
For instance, what happened to cause the Libyan Civil War that saw the end of Gaddafi. The rise of Communism in Cuba, China and Russia.
I wonder why the capitalists never seem to learn that if they shared just enough so most if not all workers earned earn enough not to starve and become homeless, then there would never be this threat.
I think their wealth corrupts the ability to reason and the thirst for more wealth and power takes over.
LikeLike
I know you-all were talking about how economics has consumed education. What you may not know is, it’s consumed law, too:
“Economists never ask whether people have good reasons for spending their money on, say, pet accessories. Likewise, the court does not ask whether people have good reasons for making campaign donations. Patriotism, ambition, faith, avarice — all are equally valid reasons for contributing, according to Citizens United.
The quid pro quo standard, which leaves motives out of the discussion, appears to lend the abstract rigor of economics to corruption law. It does not. Legislators and judges are not economists, and while it can be useful for economic analysis to ignore what drives people and focus on how they act, analyzing a problem is not the same as solving it. Policymakers do need to worry about motives, especially the ones that are dangerous to society if left unchecked.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/book-review-corruption-in-americaby-zephyr-teachout/2014/09/18/10c22734-32b9-11e4-8f02-03c644b2d7d0_story.html
LikeLike
The Roosevelts are gone. Palermo is right.
We are adrift as the storm clouds broach the horizon.
LikeLike
It is already raining cats and dogs folks.
LikeLike
While we talk of politicians, I would prefer to look at the “progeny” of ER. One person that comes to mind is Trude Lash, close friend of ER, and a major influence on policies affecting children in NYC, and elsewhere, First as Executive Director of Citizens’ Committee for Children, created by ER, and later, the Foundation for Child Development. Her thorough studies on children in ”State of the Child: New York City I and II” are amazing. One of her strong beliefs was in the power of volunteers. I think we see this in all the efforts to stop the privatization of the public schools. She certainly influenced me.
LikeLike
Thank You Diane, for this important post. They ARE capable of defying the Big Bucks-ters but they simply REFUSE to do it and for that they will answer to We The People. We must make sure that they do answer to us. We are not fragile nor fragmented. We can assemble into a powerful force for good whenever we choose. The Roosevelt Spirit will wish us well when we do.
LikeLike
Eleanor Roosevelt is one of my heroes. I was able to just see one of the seven episodes, (too much evening school work) but she was extraordinary in it, speaking at the Democratic National Convention and swaying them to vote for her husband, advocating for children, and so on. I would have gladly voted for her as President. I look forward to watching the rest of them. I’m also coming to believe that Bill Moyers is one of our greatest advocates against Wall Street and the corporations.
LikeLike
The Roosevelt PBS series is available of DVD. My wife bought the series at Costco so we could watch it whenever we wanted to.
LikeLike
Everyone that watched it was mesmerized. The beauty of the photography that Ken Burns edited and presented to tell his exquisitely crafted story of politicians who became Leaders, of men with values beyond getting elected, men who grassed that our greatness came from the way we lifted all people onto a road to opportunity.
Everyone who watched it came away with a terrible sense of loss… the loss of the humanity that these leaders displayed, the loss of our national honor, the integrity that followed when leaders grasped the values that our forefathers held sacred… values that promoted the common good as stated in the preamble to the Constitution, and ensured the freedoms that we cherish.
Television and media, purchased by the oligarchs, and the mad men that they used to sell products have been usurped to sell politicians as ‘leaders.’ Snake oil salesmen interested only in their own re-election haunt Congress.
The kind of conversations and debates that once gave evidence of the character and accomplishments of a candidate, have become farces, where the same mad-men script every word so as to demonize the opposition rather than inform the people of the candidate’ character and behaviors.
TV ended our democracy, the greatest propaganda machine in history, and today, aided by the internet, the charlatans that campaign for our highest offices are liars in a class not seen since Orwell’s “1984.”
Submitted on Monday, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:10:30 PM
LikeLike
Excellent series and true to all you stated. We can be a country for the people .
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLike
In real dollars Andrew Carnegie was much wealthier than Bill Gates. Some event may yet bring out a new leader, who like Teddy, has a martial background, like the Pretorian Guard of ancient Rome. Anyone else will end up like JFK. The post civil war years were pretty bad too and Lincoln was a victim. Ken Burns is a master. I am not sure that those who lived in those times would wax nostalgically. Look how some people view Ronald Reagan. The US was a third world country until the rise of Labor.
LikeLike
“Ken Burns is a master.” Master TEACHER? I would say so. Think about what he’s doing –telling a story. A story that informs us; that gives us important information. Isn’t this wonderful? Then think about how this runs contrary to most of the orthodoxies in education today: banish the “sage on the stage”; passive learning (e.g. viewing) is worthless; people can’t learn unless they turn and talk to their neighbors; acquiring information is not important –developing skills is. Ken Burns is LECTURE. Were I to tell an engaging and important story about the Roosevelts, aided by visuals, over the course of a week to my seventh graders, I would be deemed an incompetent teacher by the Danielson and Marzano rubrics. Doesn’t this show there is something gravely wrong with those rubrics, and with many of the orthodoxies dear to the hearts of most American teachers and administrators?
LikeLike
I might add that watching Burns is SO not Common Core-sy. Learning about a heroic president? Not important. Practicing citing evidence on random texts? Important!
LikeLike
Knowledge gets a bad rap in the 21st century classroom. Something desperately wrong with this picture. I will say unequivocally, the current generation of students is embarrassingly ignorant. Shame on us. And stay on that soap box Ponderosa. You are point blank, pitch perfect, right on this.
LikeLike
I was about ten when Franklin Roosevelt died. That moved me to tears. I suspect that many other children who had been part of the March of Dimes campaign felt a loss. That campaign really did help to fund research that ultimately produced a vaccine for polio. Everyone I knew was terrified of polio, two family friends were paralyzed. We were earnest in saving dimes and begging relatives for one more dime to complete our coin folders.
http://www.marchofdimes.org/mission/a-history-of-the-march-of-dimes.aspx
LikeLike
I think this is a good time to bring up
the 2011 right-wing fiasco of the destruction
a public mural in Maine’s Dept of Labor Building.
The reason?
Well, it was because that mural included
Franklin Roosevelt’s Secretary of Labor,
Frances Perkins, and portrayed a
“history of labor” in Maine:
First, a little info about Frances Perkins:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Perkins
According to wiki, she was “one of the only
original members of the Roosevelt cabinet
to remain in office for his entire presidency.”
—————————————————————
“During her term as Secretary of Labor, Perkins championed[vague] many aspects of the New Deal, including the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Public Works Administration and its successor the Federal Works Agency, and the labor portion of the National Industrial Recovery Act.
“With the Social Security Act she established unemployment benefits, pensions for the many uncovered elderly Americans, and welfare for the poorest Americans. She pushed to reduce workplace accidents and helped craft laws against child labor.
“Through the Fair Labor Standards Act, she established the first minimum wage and overtime laws for American workers, and defined the standard forty-hour work week.
She formed governmental policy for working with labor unions and helped to alleviate strikes by way of the United States Conciliation Service, Perkins resisted having American women be drafted to serve the military in World War II so that they could enter the civilian workforce in greatly expanded numbers.”
——————————————————————
Secretary Perkins’ pro-labor activism
was in part born out of being an eye witness to
the infamous Triangle Shirtwaist Fire, where female
garment sweatshop workers were burned alive
and/or jumped to their deaths… due to
the owners unsafe working conditions
due to cost-cutting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_Shirtwaist_Factory_fire
Again, from wiki:
—————————————————————–
“The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in Manhattan,
New York City on March 25, 1911 was the deadliest industrial disaster in the history of the city, and one of the deadliest in U.S. history. The fire caused the deaths of 146 garment workers – 123 women and 23 men [1] – who died from the fire, smoke inhalation, or falling or jumping to their deaths. Most of the victims were recent Jewish and Italian immigrant women aged sixteen to twenty-three;[2][3][4] of the victims whose ages are known, the oldest victim was Providenza Panno at 43, and the youngest were 14-year-olds Kate Leone and ‘Sara’ Rosaria Maltese.[5]
“Because the owners had locked the doors to the stairwells and exits, a common practice used to prevent workers from taking unauthorized breaks and pilferage,[6] many of the workers who could not escape the burning building jumped from the eighth, ninth, and tenth floors to the streets below. The fire led to legislation requiring improved factory safety standards and helped spur the growth of the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, which fought for better working conditions for sweatshop workers.”
—————————————————————–
Well, almost exactly 100 years after this
seminal event in labor and U.S. history,
a woman who was thus inspired by it to
dedicate her life to preventing such a disaster
from happening again, and improving
the lives of workers in general… was
white-washed out of this public mural
on display in the halls of Maine’s
government.
In 2011 the right-wing governor of Maine
was prompted to remove Secretary Perkins’
from a mural as it represented left-wing,
pro-union propaganda. This was just when
the “unions are evil” propaganda campaign—
executed by governors such as Scott
Walker of Wisconsin, and John Kasich of
Pennsylvania—-were first heating up…
and this destruction of the mural was in
line with that movement.
When this action provoked outrage, the Governor
poured gasoline on the fire of this controversy by releasing
an earlier citizen’s complaint complaint letter—-
the one which prompted Governor LePage to remove
Secretary Perkins from the mural—to justify
his action.
(The letter, which, though not Governor LePage’s
exact words, is presumably something with which
he is in precise agreement):
——————————————–
“Dear Governor LePage:
“Welcome to Augusta. You are doing a great job. Keep it up.
“The purpose of my letter is to express my disbelief of what I saw at the Maine Department of Labor Offices in Augusta during a recent visit. While sitting in the lobby I had the opportunity to study a very large mural which adorns the lobby area. In this mural I observed a figure which closely resembles the former Commissioner of Labor.
“In studying the mural I also observed that this mural is nothing but propaganda to further the agenda of the Union movement. I felt for a moment that I was in communist North Korea where they use these murals to brainwash the masses.
“Mr. LePage with all due respect I must say: “MR. LEPAGE, PLEASE TEAR DOWN THIS MURAL.”
“Again, thank you for your candor and fresh approach to State Government. Keep up the good work.
“A Secret Admirer…… ”
——————————————-
Keep in mind… this was a picture of someone that
a president—elected by the people four separate time
to serve as president— appointed to his
cabinet, and served in all four of his presidencies.
It wasn’t a picture of Marx or Lenin or Che Guevara, or whomever…
However, to this governor and the right-wingers of today, Secretary
Perkins is indeed on a par with those people.
This is what it’s coming to these days.
Here’s the New York Times article covering this:
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/the-mural-vanishes/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
LikeLike
Ms Ravitch wrote…
“Seeing this was a reminder that no one in high political office today is capable of defying the source of political campaign cash: Wall Street, the billionaires, and the big corporations”
The irony is so rich (pun intended)…
http://www.pbs.org/kenburns/the-roosevelts/about/credits
2013 The Roosevelt Film Project, Inc
Funding Provided by
– Bank of America [Numer 4 on Wall Street for Global M&A activity in 2013]
– Corporation for Public Broadcasting
– Public Broadcasting Service
– Mr. Jack C. Taylor [American businessman and billionaire who founded the Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company]
– National Endowment for the Humanities
– Arthur Vining Davis Foundations [Arthur Vining “Art” Davis was an American industrialist and philanthropist. “PBS is not eager to remind its audience that Davis was a major robber baron behind the Alcoa trust, and a notorious land speculator.”]
– Rosalind P. Walter
And by
Members of The Better Angels Society
– Jessica & John Fullerton [Former Wall Street director at JP Morgan]
– The Pfeil Foundation
– Joan Wellhouse Newton
– Bonnie & Tom McCloskey
– The Golkin Family
LikeLike
Cynthia,
It’s true that PBS mentioned all those funding sources but listen or read again. At the end, they say that the majority of funding came for viewers who donated to PBS. I don’t recall the exact language but that’s close. Maybe I’ll see it again as we continue watching.
LikeLike
Lloyd, dream on. PBS is an arm of the foundations.
LikeLike
It makes sense that the billionaires who donates millions would have more clout to get what they want than thousands of supporters who donate a few hundred (or less) annually.
But just where does the PBS money come from?
PBS draws roughly 15 percent of its revenue from the CPB. NPR’s revenue mostly comes from member station dues and fees, with 2 percent coming from CPB-issued grants. Member stations, in turn, receive about 11 percent in federal grants. According to this CPB report, most revenue to both public radio and television (about 59 percent) consists of donations from individuals, corporate underwriters and private grants, followed by state and local support (roughly 20 percent). …
“The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the entity created by Congress in 1967 to disperse funds to nonprofit broadcast outlets like PBS and NPR, is set to receive $445 million over the next two years. Per a statutory formula, public television gets about 75 percent of this appropriation while public radio receives 25 percent.
“The New York Times reported early this year. CPB also notes that revenue from individual donations went from $373 million in 1999 to $349 million in 2005.”
http://www.propublica.org/article/big-bird-debate-how-much-does-federal-funding-matter-to-public-broadcasting
Or this source, that reports 39 percent of funding comes from individuals compared to 17 percent from corporations and 8.1 percent from foundations.
Major Gifts from Individuals
NPR and our Member Stations share a common mission and many strategic goals, and are increasingly engaging philanthropic partners at high levels. These individuals and families are interested in supporting transformational, strategic advancements in public media’s capacity to meet major societal needs. The NPR Foundation, working in collaboration with Member Stations, is poised to make a significant contribution to the individual giving fundraising capacity of public media to the benefit of all.
http://www.npr.org/about-npr/178660742/public-radio-finances
Then there this post that investigates where the big money comes from. Scroll down to find “Not biting the hand that feeds you”.
That is where it gets interesting.
As they say, “follow the money”, and researching the NPR money trail leads to some interesting places.
“It’s (PBS) as tainted and corrupted as its television counterpart and now also gets a substantial proportion of its funding from corporate donors demanding influence, like the kind a $225 million behest can buy. That’s the amount gotten from the estate of the late Joan Kroc, widow of Ray Kroc, the founder of McDonald’s Corporation that never needs to worry about an unfriendly report on NPR’s airwaves no matter how egregious its behavior, and there’s plenty of it to reveal that stays suppressed in all the major media including on NPR, the “peoples’ radio.”
http://12bytes.org/articles/npr-national-public-radio-or-national-propaganda-radio
LikeLike
With the austerity movement to starve everything, PBS must look to the foundations. Between a rock and a hard place… it is what it is…
LikeLike
Yes, it is what it is and money makes a lot of noise. You know, the squeaky wheel. Millions of dollars in grants from one source with an agenda are very loud compared to someone who donates a few hundred or less than a hundred and usually doesn’t have an agenda.
LikeLike
Thanks for responding, Lloyd… By the way, I read an article on “Commonwea”l, from which I get a feed ever since I read the review of, “Reign of Terror’, there.Trust me… it’s a good one filled with accurate analysis.
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Buoyant-Billionaires-by-Ch-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Alone_Billionaires_Change_Society-140916-201.html#comment511788
This one addresses the issue, and for me,it comes as the conversation is beginning about all the ‘cults’ that are arising in the chaos that comes when the dictator is removed from a state which has NO HISTORY of democracy, or of a nation state, but is composed of tribes. I hope you read my comment at Oped which follows an article I posted about the chaos:
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/ISIS-Crisis–by-Thomas-L-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Children_Death_Denial_Education-140924-245.html#comment512982
And the synchronistic of this article here:
http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/ISIS-Crisis–by-Thomas-L-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Children_Death_Denial_Education-140924-245.html#comment512982
allowed me to say it again: ”
Underfunding education, controlling the media narrative about reform, ending the professional teacher’s role in the classroom and re-writing curricula are the ways that this CULT of oligarchs is ending our democracy … right under our noses. It is not the NSA and its surveillance that is the death knell of our rights, it is the destruction of our public education system.”
But then , who hears MY voice.
I am working hard at the intro to my new SPEAKING AS A TEACHER SITE HERE AT WORDPRESS, where I plan to speak loud and clear, and to embed small vimeo videos of me, talking about what I loved to do… enable kids to think about what we humans inevitably do.
LikeLike
Right Lloyd, but the Masters will throw the Plebes a bone to satisfy them, as long as they remain quiet. Chris Hedges talks about this, and the role that the carbon folks are playing with the recent green house demonstrations. Burns’ films are perfect grist for the mill for non active liberals, provided they continue to think that they have a “place at the table”.
LikeLike
Ms. Weiss,
I repeat: No one in political life today is willing to defy Wall Street and the billionaires.
You missed my point, which was not about who underwrote the program but about the fact that our politicians in both parties are obsequious to the rich and powerful. None dare to be a Teddy, a Franklin, or an Eleanor. None.
LikeLike
and the Security State?
LikeLike
I was mesmerized by it all week. So sad to see it end. That wonderful family strongly influenced my own family and how I was raised.
I was often surprised by the glowing descriptions of the Roosevelts by contemporary conservatives like George Will, who stopped short of drawing parallels with working class people’s current struggles. I think Burns should have included some genuine liberal minded people like Bernie Sanders and Bill Moyers, to connect the dots for the folks who seem to have no clue that we are reliving that history today, but with no Roosevelts to save us from greedy billionaires and their bought politicians.
LikeLike
I agree, I was very disappointed that George Will was included in the series. He’s made some incredibly dumb, stupid and inane comments about Social Security. Why not Paul Krugman or any number of great historians like Robert Caro, Robert Dallek, Eric Foner, etc?
LikeLike
Or how about George Will’s June article regarding sexual assaults, “College campuses are victims of their own progressivism”? http://www.twincities.com/columnists/ci_25899080/george-f-will-victims-progressivism
Burns couldn’t find someone more credible to describe the aims and merits of progressivism? It was impossible for me to appreciate that Will actually believed anything positive he was saying about progressivism and the Roosevelts. Each time he spoke, I just kept shaking my head and wondered, WTF? I don’t know when that was taped, but if Will was aiming for redemption, it didn’t work for me.
I would have also liked to see Krugman and other historians, not just the Roosevelt biographers –one of whom was interesting mostly because he became so emotional at times.
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders is an avowed Socialist. He believes in the Global Warming hoax perpetrated by Rockefeller. In other words he is aligned with Ban Ki-Moon and the UN. The UN is all about one world government and one world religion. And so are the treasonous US controllers of the comatose UN secretary general Ban Ki-Moon. He actually joined the “climate change” march in NYC yesterday.
It was a confused bunch of people marching to help indigenous people and poor people… meanwhile they don’t really understand that Rockefeller gave Bill McKibbens $5 million to run his 350.org operation. And Goldman Sachs was an underwriter of the march yesterday. They thought they were fighting Wall Street when actually they are in complete agreement with the big bankers. Cap and trade. Depopulate. That’s the Rockefeller agenda. That’s the climate change agenda.
If you are looking for someone patriotic who absolutely believes in the sovereignty of the United States, I would take a look at Walter Jones of North Carolina. He wants the 28 pages that have been blacked out of the 911 Commission report released. He wants the truth to come out. He does not want to collapse the US economy for the good of the planet. He would like to reinstate the Glass Steagall Act, FDR’s signature legislation.
LikeLike
What global warming hoax are you referring to? I’ve been busy the last several years and haven’t kept up with things. I wasn’t aware the UN was supporting a single world religion either. I hope my religion is the one they pick. Which one will it be?
You seem to know the answers.
LikeLike
Reg R. Flick, CPG, Ignore. Global warming is real and the UN conspiracy theory is the hoax:
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/08/15/523931/republican-party-officially-embraces-garbage-agenda-21-conspiracy-theories-as-its-national-platform/
LikeLike
Read this bipartisan Senate Report on the Billionaires Club that is supporting the Environmental movement. Follow the money. It is not a conspiracy. It is a criminal enterprise. And the UN is part of it.
http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=8af3d005-1337-4bc3-bcd6-be947c523439
LikeLike
This propaganda is promoted by Glenn Beck, as well as the Tea Party and the John Birch Society –both of which are mouthpieces for the billionaire Koch brothers.
These two oligarchs, David and Charles Koch, inherited their company and attitudes from their racist father, Fred Koch, a founding member of the John Birch Society. They want Koch Industries to be unfettered by the environmental regulations that aim to protect our planet, amongst other far-right policies, and they leverage their wealth and power like robber barons of yore.
As Charles Pierce so aptly stated, “If we didn’t have the political long-term memory of a gnat, this might strike us all as a problem.”
See “Sons of Birchers:”
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/Sons_Of_Birchers
LikeLike
Actually, as an Earth Science teacher and Certified Professional Geologist, my disingenuous reply was meant to encourage Ms. Hoagland to go deeper down the rabbit hole. I see that she did.
Rest assured, I understand the validity of climate change quite well, and the silliness of “one-world religions” and left-wing multinational conspiracies is just amusing to me.
I know, I know…don’t feed the trolls!
LikeLike
Greg, Thanks for the clarification. The notion that there even is a “far left” that is being led by Obama and funded by billionaires is a joke. Obama and his corporate supporters are not liberals, let alone progressives. They are center right neoliberals and I can think of no billionaires today who are funding even the near left.
The David Rockefeller piece is amusing. It’s used to discount long lost moderate Republicans, as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and the UN in promoting a “new world order” that is allegedly a conspiracy amongst corporatists and old world aristocracy. It’s quite a deep rabbit hole and she is very far into it, as she has posted here numerous times about this. Yeah, best not to “feed the trolls”.
LikeLike
United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Minority Staff Report
The Chain of Environmental Command:
How a Club of Billionaires and Their Foundations Control the Environmental
Movement and Obama’s EPA
July 30, 2014
excerpts:
…Other funding sources for Sea Change include billionaire population control zealot Bill Gates of Common Core infamy, top establishment insider and anti-sovereignty extremist David Rockefeller, and retail giant Walmart.
The report also blasted Obama’s “blatant hypocrisy” for attacking the Supreme Court after it struck down unconstitutional infringements on free speech — even as his mega-wealthy establishment allies were engaged in the tactics he was furiously condemning. “These entities propagate the false notion that they are independent, citizen-funded groups working altruistically,” the report said. “In reality, they work in tandem with wealthy donors to maximize the value of the donors’ tax deductible donations and leverage their combined resources to influence elections and policy outcomes, with a focus on the EPA.”
The report mostly focused on an “elite group of left wing millionaires and billionaires,” referred to throughout the report as the “Billionaires Club,” that actually “directs and controls the far-left environmental movement, which in turn controls major policy decisions and lobbies on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).” The “scheme” to keep their efforts hidden and far removed from the political stage “is deliberate, meticulous, and intended to mislead the public,” the study found. In all, the probe documented over $250 million in fundraising from just 15 organizations.
LikeLike
Bob Schieffer of Face the Nation shared similar insights. The lack of courage in D.C.
LikeLike
Great post. Did not have a chance to see Burns’ program. Will try to find it and watch it!
LikeLike
PBS affiliates are repeating the series this week. Comcast channel 258 repeats the series at 7:00PM and 12:00AM. In any case, PBS is very good about repeating a great series such as “The Roosevelts.” As for Dawn Hoagland, Yikes!!!!!
LikeLike
I am just pointing out the fact that it is the billionaires like Rockefeller and Bill Gates that are supporting the environmental movement, the global warming agenda. I don’t make this up. I just follow the money. Don’t blame the messenger. This is a bipartisan Senate report, not a John Birch Society publication.
http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=8af3d005-1337-4bc3-bcd6-be947c523439
LikeLike
Why do you think this a “bipartisan Senate report”? It’s a staff report from the Republican minority members of the Senate Committee on Environment Public Works (the “EPW”). It was probably commissioned by David Vitter, the ranking member of the Republican minority on the EPW. In other words, it’s pretty much the opposite of a bipartisan report.
I’m don’t think you “just follow the money.” I think you just follow the links on crackpot web sites. If you want to follow the money, try following the money that flows to Mr. Vitter and the other minority members of the EPW. Then follow the money that flows to climate-change denial science.
LikeLike
Great points, FLERP!
If you want to “follow the money that flows to climate-change denial science,” you have to look at ALEC, which has been a chief promoter of legislation to restrict environmental protections, including regulations on greenhouse gas emissions. And that leads to lots of corporate funding, including the Koch brothers, who have a representative on ALEC’s board of directors:
“ALEC also receives substantial funding from fossil fuel interests. It has received at least $600,000 from Koch Industries, between 1997-2009, during which time it fought vigorously against greenhouse gas regulation, which would no doubt help Koch Industries’ bottom line as the company profits handsomely from oil and natural gas, so much so that it was named one of the nation’s top 10 air polluters in 2010.”
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2011/07/10914/alec-exposed-warming-climate-change
Note the last paragraph at the above webpage, “ALEC Warms Up to Climate Change.” It’s not just about “climate-change denial science” now. ALEC wrote model legislation that calls for an interstate research council to study the beneficial effects of climate change. That’s why so many nutcases like this today are claiming that greenhouse gas emissions which increase atmospheric CO2 levels are a good thing.
“Yikes!”
LikeLike
You can’t even really follow it by looking at Koch. The trend over the last several years is toward “dark money” funding. $600k is nothing. The dark money funding climate change denial is in the hundreds of millions annually, conservatively speaking.
LikeLike
Yes, FLERP!, unfortunately, you are right about how hard it is now to follow the funding due to “dark money.” Time for SCOTUS term limits.
LikeLike
You should read:
Why Only the Rich Have Bounced Back
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/buoyant-billionaires?utm_source=Main+Reader+List&utm_campaign=963e0d30b6-September_16_Now_at_Commonweal7_1_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_407bf353a2-963e0d30b6-91288477
LikeLike
Right, Joe, On the Think Progress page that I linked to above, regarding the GOP’s position in their 2012 platform against the UN’s sustainable development plan, aka Agenda 21 (despite the fact that it’s non-binding and was signed by both GH Bush and GW Bush), and who believes that “garbage,” I think Brooks Bridges’ comment really pegged the conspiracy enthusiasts and global warming deniers (including those who claim to follow the money and be a “messenger,” but ignore the Koch brothers’ interests in promoting these lies), when he wrote:
“I think there are definitely simple minded dupes involved who’d be chasing crop circles if not this.”
LikeLike
“The Politician’s Choice”
Sacrifice or sin?
Golden cup or tin?
It may be sleazy,
But choice is easy:
Sell-out and cash-in
LikeLike
I too sat mesmerized for 7 nights watching history come alive under Burn’s expert hands but I was very disappointed that during the FDR segment and World War 11, only a fleeting reference was made to the “Jewish Problem!”-not even a mention of the shipload of Jews- more than 900-he sent back to their deaths in Germany during the war! When 6 million Jews and another 6 million elderly and handicapped and gay people were being slaughtered, why not show the truth that FDR did NOTHING about it!
LikeLike
Janet, I agree. This was a terrible oversight in the show and a big blot on FDR’s record. I kept wondering if the show would mention the ship “St. Louis,” which left Germany with 900 Jews and was refused entry to the US or any other port. It returned to Germany, and the passengers were shipped to death camps. The administration knew about the death camps.
LikeLike
An interesting, related article titled, “The Late, Great American WASP” from the WSJ
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304367204579268301043949952
LikeLike
Diane, No one dares since JFK. His experience has sobered our leaders. Where was George W sent to during 9/11? Why is there a man with a knife at the White House, while Obama bombs a foreign country, Syria, in violation of international law.? Let’s stick with education on this site.
LikeLike
Joseph, it is my blog and I will write whatever I want.
LikeLike
Just a suggestion Diane. Our Country is on a slippery slop and unless we address the money of the security state, we are doomed,
nothing personal. You have been “gifted” with this forum and my comments are always in humility and service, that is our commonality. Cheers,
joseph
LikeLike
What experience of JFK? Being assassinated? I hadn’t known until I watched The Roosevelts that would-be assassins shot both TR and FDR at point blank range. That didn’t stop either of them, nor has it seemed to prevent others from pursuing the presidency, including JFK and Reagan, both of whom were also shot.
Public education was made into a political matter by politicians, so I think it’s very important for educators to learn as much as possible about politics, and this forum is a great place to discuss that.
Thanks for posting about this, Diane!
LikeLike
I appreciate Flerp! for pointing out that the Senate report that I referenced is not in fact bipartisan, but a minority report by a Republican Task Force on a bipartisan committee. That is a legitimate criticism and I apologize for mislabeling the report bipartisan. I like to be accurate.
The rest of the objections seem to resort to name calling: troll, crop circle chaser, rabbit hole explorer, crackpot website frequenter, denier…..which is never legitimate and always in bad taste.
The report is legitimate. The connections between officials in the EPA and the grant recipients are factual no matter who gathered the facts. It is well referenced and footnoted with names, dates, events and documents such as tax records. You can’t really discount the report just because it is Republican. (By the way, I am a registered Democrat.)
So I do not understand why people are so concerned with Koch Brother money corrupting our political system (which I also find deplorable) while not being that interested in Walton, Rockefeller, Soros, Gates money used to invent and market the environmental movement which underpins the treasonous objective to erase borders and national sovereignty in favor of a world headed up by edicts from the UN to inventory and control all of the resources of the world.
Why is it valid for Diane to document the Billionaire Boys Club that is funding the education “reform” movement but not valid for a Republican task force to find the same people are funding the environmental movement? Why is one considered the truth and the other considered a conspiracy? I don’t get it.
Excerpts from the report:
“This report demonstrates that, far from pursuing philanthropic goals, the money from this elite group is funneled to like-minded activists in a defined fee-for-service arrangement.”
“The Billionaire’s Club has formed exclusive networks and alliances–in and out of the
federal government–to maximize the effectiveness of its “investment.” One such outfit is the Environmental Grantmakers Association–command central of the environmental movement. It is also very secretive, refusing to disclose their membership list to Congress.”
Groups at the march on Sunday like 350.org, Greenpeace, NRDC have received grants from these billionaire foundations: The Walton Family Foundation, The Tides Foundation, The Rockefeller Foundation. Meanwhile marchers were chanting “Down with Wall Street.” ????
You find this amusing? I find it depressing that 400,000 people were deluded by Wall Street into pushing the exact agenda they promote for the good of Wall Street, not the indigenous, or the poor, or the planet.
LikeLike
Most people here have voiced a lot of concerns about all of the venture philanthropists who dole out cash in exchange for pushing their agendas, especially the business plan to privatize public education for which there is much evidence.
What you don’t get is that “the treasonous objective to erase borders and national sovereignty in favor of a world headed up by edicts from the UN to inventory and control all of the resources of the world” is a hoax. Nowhere does the UN claim this to be their goal, including in Agenda 21, which is non-binding yet conspiracy theorists typically point to it as their primary evidence. The premise is false so the house of cards has fallen.
You have dug in your heels as an international conspiracy promoter and a global warming denier based on right-wing propaganda, and despite the scientific evidence of climate change, so don’t expect to find support from highly educated people here.
LikeLike
Diane
Despite my challenging comments, you have tolerated free speech, that’s why I like you. Others have not been so “tolerant”. My comments have only been “food for thought”. I welcome responses from my ideas. Cheers! I have a long background in education and as an adjunct in graduate school. Recently, the Mayor of NYC has called for an investigation re: my concerns about urban schools. I can forward them if you have an email address. j.mugivan@yahoo.com. Randi should be very familiar with them and they are before the NYC Dept. of Investigation.
LikeLike
Veteran Educator,
Are you saying that I am not one of the “highly educated people” on this blog because I profess an alternative opinion on climate change to most expressed here? It is so interesting that those who disagree with me never debate me on the veracity of what I am saying. They call me names.
You question my education. You call me a conspiracy promoter. But you do not argue any of the actual points I am making. Try refuting the facts which I am putting forward. Have some intellectual integrity.
Did you read any of the Senate report for which I provided a link? Can you refute the fact that the Walton Family Foundation funds environmental groups? Can you refute the fact that the Sea Change Foundation, a private California foundation, which relies on funding from a foreign company with undisclosed donors funnels tens of millions of dollars to other large but discreet foundations and prominent environmental activists who strive to control both policy and politics. Please prove that these senators and their reports are wrong. Their facts are erroneous? Their references and tax documents are falsified?
Agenda 21 is a non-binding resolution which was elevated to the cabinet level of importance in 1993 by Bill Clinton when he created the Presidential Council on Sustainable Development. Cuomo sat on that council. The Sierra Club and Greenpeace representatives sat on that council right next to the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Energy. They worked together to create NAFTA. What a wonderful project of wealth redistribution….Refute these facts. Mocking me is immaterial. Refute the facts.
Or even refute my global warming denial facts. C02 is not a pollutant. It is the basis of life.
Greenhouse gases only make up .04 of the atmosphere. The small amount of man made carbon is negligible in the big picture.
Should we have a climate change march protesting water vapor? It provides a tremendous greenhouse effect.
Even the IPCC admits the actual temperature increase over the past 15 years has only been about 0.05°C per decade. The average increase predicted by the climate models is 0.3°C per decade. The predicted temperature increase is six times greater than the actual temperature increase over the past decade and a half. So the “science” isn’t settled as they like to say. The computer models have proven to be exaggerations so far.
Can you refute the facts that I am presenting with a cogent argument?
LikeLike
You may be highly educated about Art, but you are no expert on climate change, so stop polluting this blog with your ongoing global warming denial and conspiracy theory nonsense. People here have a lot better things to do than argue with a wall.
LikeLike
Plenty of people here have refuted this hooey but she is married to the myths, so there is no point in engaging in further discussions.
I think we can assume that she thinks these scientists from across the globe are complicit in her international conspiracy:
“Climate Change Scientists Warn: We’re Almost Too Late”
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119236/un-draft-climate-report-issues-warning-world
LikeLike