We all know, or should know, about Campbell’s Law. That is a social science axiom that says:
“The more any quantitative social indicator (or even some qualitative indicator) is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.”
The short translation: the more you measure people and tie high-stakes to the measurement, the more likely they are to make the measurement the point of their activity, which distorts the activity. Campbell’s Law explains why teachers teach to the test or even cheat, because so much is riding on achieving high test scores. So teachers forget about everything other than test scores, such as citizenship, character, ethics, and so on.
Arthur Goldstein, who teaches high school ESL in New York City, here explains how Campbell’s Law has been replaced by Campbell Brown’s Law. Campbell Brown is the media figure who is leading a lawsuit to eliminate tenure in New York State.
Here is Campbell Brown’s Law:
“Campbell Brown’s Law says whatever goes wrong in school is the fault of the tenured teachers. If you fail, it’s because the teacher had tenure and therefore failed you. Absolutely everyone is a great parent, so that has nothing to do with how children behave. Campbell Brown’s Law says parents have no influence whatsoever on their children. If parents have to work multiple jobs to make ends meet, that will have no effect. If they provide no supervision because they aren’t around, that won’t affect kids either.
“Campbell Brown’s Law says kids themselves are not responsible either. If they don’t study, that isn’t their fault. The teacher should have made them study. If they fail tests because they didn’t study, it’s a crime and the teacher should be fired. Under Campbell Brown’s Law the only obstacle to studying is if the teacher has tenure. This is unacceptable and it is therefore the reason that the parents work 200 hours a week. It’s also the reason the kids didn’t study. The kids figured they didn’t have to study because their teachers had tenure.
“Campbell Brown’s Law is demonstrated in charter schools, where teachers don’t have tenure. All kids excel in charter schools, except for those who don’t. That explains why, in some charter schools, that all the students who graduate are accepted to four-year colleges. It’s neither here nor there if two-thirds of the students who began ended up getting insufficient standardized test scores and getting dumped back into public schools. That’s not the fault of the charter teachers, because they don’t have tenure and are therefore blameless. Campbell Brown’s Law says so.”
It is an excellent post, and how brilliant to connect Campbell’s Law to Campbell Brown ‘s Law.
Goldstein concludes:
“In short, if you’re a tenured teacher, you are an impediment to Excellence. The only way you can help children is by getting rid of your tenure, standing up straight and walking to Arne Duncan in Washington DC and saying, “Please sir, I want to be fired for any reason. Or for no reason. I want to take personal responsibility for all the ills of society. Neither you, society, poverty, parents, nor children themselves are responsible. I’m ready to be dismissed at the whim of Bill Gates or the Walmart family and I agree with you that Katrina was the bestest thing to happen to the New Orleans education system.”
“Me, I’m still a tenured teacher. And as terrible as that may be, I’m still relieved to never have had students so hopelessly stupid as Arne Duncan or Campbell Brown.”
As for me, I took a lot of hostile comments on Twitter for saying to a Washington Post reporter recently that Campbell Brown was pretty but didn’t know much about teaching. Outraged people, many of whom seemed to work for Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst or similar organizations, called me sexist for saying she was pretty but didn’t object when I said she was clueless about education. Anyone who wants to call me pretty (at the ripe old age of 76), you have my permission. Have at it. I wonder what the enraged Brownians will think about Campbell Brown’s Law.
RT: send 2 @campbell_brown Her CNN slogan: NO BIAS NO BULL,
Campbell, get this perp http://t.co/aU9tjDWoIf
Here’s Jersey Jazzman’s takedown of Campbell Brown’s appearance on the “Stephen Colbert Report” : (which includes an embedded video of her entire exchange with Colbert):
http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2014/08/campbell-brown-lame.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JerseyJazzman+%28Jersey+Jazzman%29
Some of this rival’s the great Edushyster’s wry sarcasm:
——————————————–
“Let’s start with her detractors: apparently, some folks showed up to protest outside the show, which Campbell says they have the right to do. Except she also says what they’re really doing is silencing debate, which I guess is what happens when someone opposes Campbell’s point of view.
“So yes, let’s have a debate, except let’s not…
“Ooo, is that scary! I mean, look at these thugs, what with their magic-markered poster boards and their peaceful milling around on the sidewalk! No wonder Campbell won’t say who is financing her operation — clearly, these parents who are “trying to silence debate” are “going to go after people who are funding this”!
“And by “go after,” I guess Brown means “hold up hand-made signs”! Clearly, we must protect Brown’s plutocratic backers from this danger at all costs — including any normal standards of transparency. This also explains why Brown must raise funds to pay off a high-priced PR firm with ties to the Obama administration. I mean, when 20 people can show up at one of your many media appearances and do this – ”
——————————————–
and on it goes with a detailed point-by-point rebuttal of everything Campbell Brown says… all of it leading up to this knockout finish”
——————————————–
“And that is precisely the problem: the debate about tenure is now dominated by telegenic partisans who have no knowledge of education policy and won’t reveal their funders — all while the voices of teachers are excluded. Campbell Brown can be as illogical as she pleases, because no one, as of yet, has been allowed an opportunity to debate her on equal terms.
“She can make as many rambling, self-contradictory, and ignorant statements as she likes, because she is the only one at the table. She doesn’t have to make a lick of sense, because no one is there to call her out on her nonsense. My guess is she’s going to take the path of Michelle Rhee: refusing to publicly defend her positions against well-informed, well-reasoned critique.
“How lame.”
——————————————–
Mercedes Schneider just posted an in-depth expose of fellow Louisianan Campbell Brown’s background, connections and motivations.
A MUST-READ:
http://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2014/08/01/pretty-campbell-brown-and-her-ugly-misguided-anti-due-process-crusade/
Got it Jack, thanks. Tweeting now.
Oh, great. Another cluless talking head who knows nothing about the complexity of teaching and learning.
Hey, lighten up, it’s satire, like Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert.
What a priceless, hilarious comment. But the Waltons and the pseudo-reformers may not get the satire.
Look at all the people that DNA testing has demonstrated to be wrongly convicted and incarcerated. Crime statistics have high stakes for property values, in addition to the pressure that police departments face to have statistics demonstrate how effective police forces are.
Great job of reconstructing the original Campbell’s Law.
I like what Goldstein says. Diane likes what Goldstein says.
I’ve said here, on this blog, “Students and parents should be accountable,” and people have commented, “We get nowhere by bringing the kids into it.”
Many kids, not all, don’t think ANYTHING is going to happen to ANYONE if they choose to self destruct academically. In a short while, our students will soon realize that THEY won’t suffer the consequences for their own bad choices, and will continue cruising in their math classes, waiting for their high school counselors to offer them the easy way out so that they might matriculate, e.g., credit recovery and summer school courses. Kids know how the game is played, and they play it well. Forces beyond my control foster the destructive attitudes in our students and have undermined teachers on the front lines.
Students quickly give up easy when we ask them to think. The experts have concluded that we teachers are responsible for students who cannot think critically, so they gave us Common Core.
When you don’t go after the head of the snake, you’re going to get bit.
No, Diane, you are beautiful because of what you stand for, how hard you work, and how you inspire others to do the same.
Yup! What she said.
-A grateful fan
Also sounds like a variant of Murphy’s Law: “Campbell Murphy Brown’s Law”:
Whatever can go wrong will go wrong, so long as we have tenured teachers.
DAM Brilliant!!! Thanks for the new slogan! (We need to make tee’s!)
I’m certain that my mother always taught me, “Pretty is as pretty does.”
The mug shot I’m looking at shows her in a red blouse with her arms crossed.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and I don’t think she’s pretty at all. She looks Victorian and frigid and that, if I’m correct, may explain her animosity against public school teachers.
Here’s a pull quote from the piece I found on her:
“Brown has received guidance from David Welch, the Silicon Valley billionaire who funded the Vergara case. She will not disclose the names of donors funding her current effort.”
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/exclusive-group-families-file-lawsuit-challenging-teacher-tenure-article-1.1881368#ixzz38z5Gmw1s
She looks “frigid”? What are you, a gynecologist from 1960?
LOL
No, in the 1960s, right out of high school, I went in the Marines and ended up fighting in Vietnam where sniper and mortar rounds came too close but fortunately not that close.
“Frigid” is what popped into my mind as I thought how I would describe her if she was a character in a novel. The expression on her face reminded me of Queen Elizabeth the 1st in the film where the actress sat on the throne with her face painted white and told the court that she was already married to England and would not marry any man.
Yes, we must watch our tongues when discussing a disturbingly wealthy woman who accuses, in so many ways, all teachers of being pedophiles. Tut tut.
Technically the only restrictions on your speech here are Diane and our own sense of decency. So have at it, certainly I can’t control what you say or what to think.
As long as we’re decent towards our betters I’m sure the arc of history will continue to bend towards justice.
At least Lloyd could laugh about it. Again, have at it. Let’s assume I’m a huge prude and a PC freak. Now go bend the arc of history by telling me, in your own words, not Lloyd’s, what you think Campbell Brown looks like.
She’s an attractive tv personality who once posed as a reporter and who has now sold her soul as an eduwhore to feign concern for poor children while attempting to make herself relevant and land a new gig at Fox News. She beats the perp drum while her BFF’s husband, at the age of 30, molested a teenage girl. NO BULL NO BIAS, her CNN
slogan.
She looks rich and glassy eyed.
Isn’t that what Obama/Duncan are saying? It’s the teachers!!!
Sounds like Catch-22. If you have tenure you will be lazy. Who says? Campbell Brown’s Law (cbl). The only way to not be a lazy teacher is to give up or have your tenure taken away. Without tenure we can be assured that every teacher will be working at their maximum potential. This means all students will be maximizing their potential too without regard to the conditions of their lives. How do we know? Cbl. Say it makes it so.
As for the skewing of the system to serve the tests we need look no further than the air force officers who cheated because of the importance of the tests on their careers even though they all scored 95 or better after being caught and retested. They knew the material but cheated anyway because of the pressure built into the system. They are now doing it pass fail.
Can’t leave out Coleman’s Decree…
“… these standards are worthy of nothing if the assessments built on them are not worthy of teaching to, period…teachers will teach towards the test. There is no force strong enough on this earth to prevent that. There is no amount of hand-waving, there‟s no amount of saying, “They teach to the standards, not the test; we don‟t do that here.” Whatever. The truth is – and if I misrepresent you, you are welcome to take the mic back. But the truth is teachers do. Tests exert an enormous effect on instructional practice, direct and indirect, and its hence our obligation to make tests that are worthy of that kind of attention. It is in my judgment the single most important work we have to do over the next two years to ensure that that is so, period.”
http://vigornotrigor.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/common-cores-a-team/
A Mississippi K-12 teacher’s comments about tenure and teacher’s unions are both interesting and insightful. Her comment was that neither tenure nor teacher unions were available in Mississippi. Since the state is one of the lowest performing states in K-12 performance, however measured- NAEP, SAT, ACT etc. how does NOT having tenure and a teacher’s union effect high K-12 student performance?
As a retired teacher of 40 years plus and current educational researcher, why do educators, media, and experts examine meaningless, non- validated, reasons for poor student and school performance. Research and common sense suggests that all the K-12 system must do to improve student K-12 achievement is develop the models, programs “tools”, and expertise to promote the student by 80% proficiency, as the student moves from grade to grade. A simple and inexpensive model on how to accomplish the goal in K-12 is to promote students by proficiency level SEPARATELY from the traditional attendance grade. For example, a student could be in 3rd grade by attendance, but could be PLACED and PROMOTED into an academic level 1,2,3,4, or 5 by demonstrated readiness by a recommendation of the teacher or measured empirically using appropriate diagnostic-prescriptive tests. The student would still be promoted each year by attendance, but the academic level would very, based upon academic proficiency achievement. The promotional change into the appropriate level could be made each grading period or semester. If the school model had three semesters in the program- fall, spring, and summer- the student, having problems would have more time( 3 semesters to do 2 semesters of work) to master the information and the more advanced student could progress at a faster rate to a higher level. Since all the students would be at approximately the same academic level in the model, class size could be larger and less expensive, less time is needed for remedial instruction, less behavior problems, and the students could help each other learn more readily. In the model, there would be no remedial nor advanced classes only one program in each discipline. In addition, the responsibility for student learning is placed upon the student’s interest, motivation, and ability, in which the teacher and parent are the facilitators to maximize student achievement. Peer pressure is a strong motivator for students to perform well related to their peer group. Obviously, you can not force a student to learn, but you can give the student a valid academic choice to learn, that many students do not currently have in K-12, because their skill level is not appropriate to have “effective direct instruction ” on the material that is being presented.
Question: Does anyone disagree that this inexpensive model for K-12 seems to be both logical and practical? Research on programs applying some of thee ideas in K-12 are already in effect along with many “tools” to help maximize student achievement.
If interested send me a fax # to ekangas@juno.com. I am not selling anything, but a change in thinking that is needed before a change in behavior and effective practices can occur. Eric Kangas
In short, build the right incentives into the system and meet the students where they are at and success is more likely. I like the idea of aligning the system to what actually occurs in the system. Not sure about unintended consequences. Where is anything like this being done? The results?
This tenure=failure isn’t the up-front propaganda, though. Like “shared sacrifice”, it’s an approach (like “job creators” “trickle down”…) that can’t stick with the victims it targets. We just all know the truth-the same that we really know the impact of inequity in policy and society has crippled families and burdened the majority to further enrich the minority (who perpetuate and cement policy structures making it so)
So CBs thrust is that it’s perverts in the classroom. Unions just don’t want to protect kids from perverts because they would rather have tenure than non-molested successful children. What is wrong with perverted unionized teachers with tenure? If we got rid of tenure, public schools get better because our children will no longer get molested there. An emotional, insane argument-but typical of profiteer privilege PR…the kind CBs husband and his connections would be adept at pre-creating to pave the propaganda road. If you argue against getting perverts out of the classroom…how does that make you look? A smart counter that drags all the roaches into the light is needed.
Ekangas, I totally agree with your model. Your model would definitely work, but then responsibility for learning would also be placed on the student and parents. Think of that! Currently, our educational system places very little responsibility on the student and the parents. The scapegoats are all of us teachers. We are responsible for everything that goes wrong. Doing away with grade levels and allowing children to progress at their own developmental levels would be a recipe for success. The student’s dignity, of course, would always be protected, and I think you would begin to see a spike in student interest and achievement. In many grade levels today, students have no interest or incentive to do their very best. There is nothing in it for them. I thoroughly enjoyed your post. I have always thought your model would work. Thank you! (:
I saw Campbell Brown joining in with two evil witches–Michelle Rhee and Ann Coulter, forming a trio of TRICHES in Salon two weeks ago…
Campbell Brown is not pretty. Outside of that I agree with everything you’ve written.
Ken, Campbell is probably the “new” Rhee–that is, she’s the pretty, pouty, take-no-prisoners poster girl for the reform movement, since Rhee has pretty much become persona non grata since the Merrow debacle, all of Diane’s publicizing of it, & Rhee’s refusal to debate Diane. Lloyd said, above, “…she’s in a red blouse with her arms crossed.” Isn’t that “the (power) pose”–you know, tough-looking (man or woman), arms crossed? All hail Campbell! We have forgotten/erased her predecessor, she-who-shall-not-be-named.
Kinda like that classic Eagles song, “New Kid in Town.”
Thanks, Duane–love this song!
De nada.
I figure there may be some younger folk out there who didn’t recognize the song hence the link.
That song says a lot, as do many songs!
If the MSM were doing their job, Michelle’s Rheeplacement and her Big Bag o’ Lies would be rightfully consigned to the dustbin of history.
Awesome post!!!