The following letter was written by labor leader Lee Saunders to Dr. Michael Lomax, president of the United Negro College Fund, to protest the fund’s acceptance of a gift of $25 million from the Koch brothers.
From: Portside labor
Subject: A Principle Is A Terrible Thing to Waste
A Principle Is A Terrible Thing to Waste
Lee A. Saunders
July 14, 2014
Huffington Post
Lee Saunders, President of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees writes in a letter to Dr. Michael Lomax, President of the United Negro College Fund that the union is halting all contributions to the fund and requesting that its affiliate locals do the same. President Saunders writes that this is a result of the fund accepting $25 million dollars from Charles and David Koch as well as speaking at their summit meeting in California.
Dr. Michael Lomax
President, United Negro College Fund
1805 7th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Dear Dr. Lomax:
As you know, AFSCME has a partnership with UNCF that began more than a decade ago. We are very proud of the AFSCME/UNCF Union Scholars Program. The program gives sophomore and junior students of color the opportunity to work with AFSCME over the summer, learn about the labor movement, and receive scholarship support during their junior and senior years of college. Through the program, we have helped dozens of students find jobs with AFSCME or in other social justice organizations. AFSCME has gained many talented new staff. And a generation of students has learned about workers’ rights and the value of public services.
We have been especially proud of the Union Scholars Program and our partnership with the UNCF because of our union’s commitment to racial equity and social justice. We are dedicated to providing the necessary support for young people of color to join the AFSCME team and build a staff that reflects the increasingly diverse population of our nation.
Therefore it is with the deepest regret that I write to notify you that we must sever our partnership. We are doing this as a result of actions you have taken as president of the UNCF that are not only deeply hostile to the rights and dignity of public employees, but also a profound betrayal of the ideals of the civil rights movement.
Like many supporters of the UNCF, I was deeply troubled by your decision to accept $25 million from David and Charles Koch. But I assumed that in accepting those funds you were in no way supporting or lending the name of the UNCF to the political or social causes or substantive views of the Koch brothers.
So I was truly stunned to learn that less than two weeks later, you attended and spoke at the Koch brothers summit in California. This was a betrayal of everything the UNCF stands for. The avowed purpose of this private event was to build support — financial and political — for the Koch brothers’ causes. Your appearance at the summit can only be interpreted as a sign of your personal support and the UNCF’s organizational support of the Koch brothers’ ideological program.
The Koch brothers and the organizations they fund have devoted themselves for more than a decade to attacking the voting rights of African Americans. They support voter identification laws. They seek to restrict early voting and voter registration. They support laws that threaten organizations that register voters in the African American community.
They funded organizations that advocated for the Supreme Court’s rolling back of the Voting Rights Act and the removal of the special protections the act provided to people of color in those parts of the country where so many of our forebears were killed for seeking to exercise their right to vote. The Koch brothers are the single most prominent funders of efforts to prevent African Americans from voting.
Lending your name to the Koch brothers’ efforts to disenfranchise African Americans would be sufficient to compel me to sever our relationship. But it is not my only objection to your actions. Charles Murray, author of The Bell Curve, was also a speaker at the Koch brothers’ summit. There is no person in America whose work is more opposed to the fundamental mission of the UNCF than Charles Murray. For decades, he has dedicated himself to promoting the notion that the over-representation of African Americans among America’s poor and in America’s prisons is the consequence not of our history or of the types of public policies the Koch brothers promote, but rather is a consequence of our genetic inferiority. The unmistakable implication of his work is that the UNCF effort to provide paths out of poverty and despair for African Americans and other students of color is futile.
According to Professor Murray, we and our children are genetically inferior. For these reasons, I must sever the relationship between our organizations. Effective September 1, 2014, we will not continue our partnership. I am also urging all AFSCME affiliates to sever their relationships with and cease fundraising for the UNCF. We must hold ourselves to the same standards that we promote through the Union Scholars Program: to practice what we preach, to fight for social justice, and to stand up for what we believe. I cannot in good conscience face these students or AFSCME’s members if I looked the other way and ignored your actions.
AFSCME remains committed to the mission of the Union Scholars Program. We will work directly with historically black and other colleges and universities, faculty members, student organizations, and other allies to make internship, scholarship and job opportunities available to students of color. With disappointment and determination we will continue the work without you and the UNCF.
Sincerely,
Lee Saunders
AFSCME President

Hear hear! It’s about time civil rights groups stood up to plutocrats.
LikeLike
Civil rights organizations have all been bought off by billionaires today, and they want to hide who their financial backers are as well:
“NAN, NAACP & Other Hypocritical “Civil Rights” Organizations Assert “Constitutional Right” To Conceal Their Corporate Funding Before the FCC”
http://blackagendareport.com/content/nan-naacp-other-hypocritical-civil-rights-organizations-assert-constitutional-right-conceal-
LikeLike
“Black Leadership Response to the Koch $25 Million “Gift” Should Be a Movement For Free College Tuition”
http://blackagendareport.com/content/black-leadership-response-koch-25-million-%E2%80%9Cgift%E2%80%9D-should-be-movement-free-college-tuition
LikeLike
College will never be free. At best you can get someone else to pay for a persons education.
LikeLike
TE, in Finland, no student at any level ever pays tuition. Education is viewed as a human right, and a right can’t be paid for.
LikeLike
If Finland has anything close to the same demographics of university attendance as the United States, they have the relatively poor taxpayer paying for the education of the relatively wealthy college student.
Why would you think it just that people doing hard work for low wages should pay for a physician child to get a post secondary education?
LikeLike
According to my friend who lived in Finland for a bit, even speeding tickets are “socialized”.
The amount of the fine is according to your wealth.
So the “relatively poor” pay less of their income than the “relatively rich”.
Sounds good to me.
Any ticket (of any kind) I could ever hope to pay would be a joke to some.
Just a thought.
LikeLike
Ang,
Perhaps my poor phrasing resulted in you misunderstanding my point. If you have taxpayers make college education free, the folks earning minimum wage will be paying for a portion of Bill and Melinda Gate’s children to go to college. Does this seem like a good idea to you?
LikeLike
No problem, it it means going after the money men like Gates hide in offshore tax havens, which totalled $166B in 2012 alone:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014420857
There’s $32 Trillion hidden by elites overseas, but instead of targeting those people, IRS and the federal student loan police have their sights set on folks like me –and I am not even a hundredaire.
LikeLike
Anonymous,
In 2012 public institutions collected about $63.4 billion in tuition revenue and private non-profits collected about $64 billion in tuition revenue (http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cud.asp).
You $166 billion would make post secondary education “free” for a year and a half, let’s call it four semesters. Do you want to continue the program beyond spring 2016? If so, you need another revenue source.
LikeLike
Yes, because costs can never be controlled, removing profit motive never results in decreased costs, the way we fund and operate higher education can never be modified in any way, and we are helpless to control these despite the fact that Europe (and other countries) do it successfully and have for years and years. Just like medicine and banking, right? The way it is done now is the only way it was ever done, can ever be done, or ever will be done.
The status quo is not an immovable object controlled by an irresistible force.
I thought you would understand these simple facts since you are an economist.
LikeLike
Chris,
Of course you can have taxpayers pay for everyone’s college education. At current tuition rates a wealthy family will save something on the order of $160,000 dollars. They could buy some really good graduation presents with those saving.
LikeLike
Exactly, Chris. Some economists are married to convention and have absolutely no clue how to be creative or do things differently.
LikeLike
Anonymous and Chris,
Unless you can wave a wand and build, maintain, heat buildings, get faculty and staff to work for nothing, education at every level will never be free.
I have no idea why you think it is a good idea to have poor people pay to educate the wealthy. The frat boys can buy a better model BMW partly at the expense of the minimum wage workers in the country.
LikeLike
It’s the current system of not of taxing those with obscene wealth at higher rates and no penalties for hiding assets offshore, which means that the poor are paying for the rich, not the other way around.
All done talking to a wall.
LikeLike
Anonymous,
So who should pay to provide Bill And Melinda’s children with a college education?
LikeLike
Exactly, Anonymous. let’s go back to the tax levels we had when I first entered college in1978 and paid around $27 per credit hour at my land grant university where I received a top notch liberal arts education.
LikeLike
Chris,
Would you want to institute a state income tax in Florida or increase the regressive sales tax?
LikeLike
Why would you want to make claims about the poor paying for the rich while defending the abhorrent policies that promote the hording practices of the 1%?
(I don’t intend to read your answer so don’t bother posting another one of your bizarre proclamations and rationalizations.)
LikeLike
Victorino,
I think I will reply anyway.
Lets take Florida, where poster Chris lives. Florida has no state income tax, so it depends primarily on sales and property taxes for state revenue (better able to capture revenue from tourists this way). Sales taxes are regressive, meaning that the poor generally pay a higher proportion of their income in tax than the rich. Making college “free” for everyone will require increases in tax revenue. Florida might institute a new income tax to pay for it (if you want to tax the 1% it would only be on households earning a little less than $400,000 a year) and see what the rates would have to be to raise sufficient funds. More likely Florida would increase the rates on existing taxes and the system would become more regressive. The folks who live from paycheck to paycheck would have to give up a little something so that William Koch (a resident of Palm Beach) would not have to pay for his grandchildren’s college education.
LikeLike
“Florida has no state income tax” and don’t forget nearly no corporate taxes either thanks to our last 2 Republican governors who promised widespread prosperity if only businesses were allowed to siphon in state money and tax breaks. The prosperity for the citizens of Florida never materialized but businesses flocked here so they could operate without paying their fair share.
Again, te, the straw man. Florida could institute a state income tax — it has been talked about quite a bit actually — and repeal all the corporate welfare tax breaks. It would be difficult with our illegally gerrymandered districts and tea party/conservative control of the state legislature but the wealthy old white people and racists are losing their dominance and being replaced by more progressive, liberal immigrants who gave the state to Obama in the last 2 presidential elections so anything is possible despite your conviction that nothing can ever be done differently.
LikeLike
Lomax is on the national board of directors of Teach for America. This is interesting:
“Education Reform: What Adrian Fenty and Michelle Rhee Got Wrong”
BY: MICHAEL LOMAX
http://bit.ly/1nL4L8A
I wonder what changed his mind.
LikeLike
$25 million can be powerfully persuasive to people who already think they stand above the rest of us by virtue of their position. Power needs capital to exert itself and it is an old, old story about how the lust for power and money causes many to abandon all they once believed in and fought for — principle amnesia.
LikeLike
“Corporate Funding of Urban League, NAACP & Civil Rights Orgs Has Turned Into Corporate Leadership”
http://blackagendareport.com/corporate-funding-urban-league-naacp-civil-rights-orgs-has-turned-corporate-leadership
LikeLike
Yeah, the Black Agenda Report has really got the situation pegged. Plutocrats have paid off all the major players in the black community, from black ministers to black civil rights groups to black politicians. This is truly a travesty of huge proportions.
“Glen Ford Speaks about the Black “Mis-Leadership” Class”
LikeLike
So, the unofficial official pushback is “The NAACP doesn’t reveal is donors”? That’s not really an agreement for why the UNCF should take the Koch money. I’m sure the folks at Black Agenda Report would agree. They’d also be appalled that some people are using them to support the Koch Brothers.
“With historically black colleges and universities in a deep fiscal and strategic hole, accepting $25 million from the evil Koch brothers is not evidence of sagacity, pragmatism or wisdom. It’s a decision to dig that hole even deeper.”
http://bit.ly/1ruSMUe
LikeLike
Sorry, I don’t understand what your point is.
The point that I think the Black Agenda Report is making is that we cannot rely on civil rights groups that have not only been bought by big business but also want to conceal who has bought them, so it’s time to sweep those phonies aside and fight for our rights ourselves.
That includes fighting for the right to a free public education through college, instead of begging for donations from billionaires. We should be demanding that the plutocrats be taxed at a higher rate, because we still don’t have a “land where men will not take necessities from the many to give luxuries to a few… a land where all our gifts and resources are held, not for ourselves alone, but as instruments of service to the rest of humanity,” as Martin Luther King dreamed. And we should never, ever expect to get there by waiting for billionaires and their bought puppets to hand it over to us.
I think it’s a call to action.
LikeLike
This is where it starts and ends with the decision-making process based on virtue theory of ethics that is how we make moral decisions which is a process of developing a moral attitude. Without having a philosophical debate about this theory between empiricism and rationalism, it is obvious that greed, power, control is immoral as evidenced by plutocrats and the like. In fact they go through great lengths to deceive the truth and mask their objectives. Acceptance of a $25 million gift in this case! How can the words gift and bribery be synonomous but to only people who are immoral?
How did we allow plutocrats to run the country? Obviously, they don’t practice sound reasoning and thinking. Plutocrats lead their lives and decision-making process without a comprehensible route for their thinking. Perhaps cynicism is to blame (just an excuse). None-the-less, they lead their lives talking past others and live in reckless abandonment when it comes down to making ethical decisions.
How can we eradicate their subjegation of the unwary public? Where questioning ethical issues should continue, it isn’t happening to its fullest potential. We still live in the dark ages of what is acceptable to discuss in the classroom which is why we have plutocrats running the country. We need to empower students to have an understanding of how to differentiate between truth and fallacies, so that they can make sound decisions as adults based on the truth or misconceptions biased on their background knowledge. We cannot allow our students to be impulsive decision-makers influenced by unethical people. How can this not be somehow related to staying away from strangers, good touch/bad touch, or describing a con artist? Teachers should have rights without repercussion to expose students to both sides of policy making whether in or outside the classroom. Ironically, there is too much trepidation in wanting to do this when we are not respected and jobs are threathened.
I commend Saunders for his virtuous quality to stick to his principles, publicly sever partnership with unscrupulous people and to expose the truth. I hope that more students can acquire this kind of foundation in understanding the knowledge presented to them, articulating the truth and fallacies, and making sound decisions based on ethically sound principles.
LikeLike
Plutocrats have always been around. There are just periods when their self-serving ideas have more traction and periods when they have less. Now vs Great Depression.
LikeLike
Here is site which lists a number of charitable donations by the David Koch foundation: http://www.kochfamilyfoundations.org/FoundationsDHK.asp
Should these organizations turned down the donations:
The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT.
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital to help build the David H. Koch Center, a new ambulatory care center
Johns Hopkins University for the David H. Koch Cancer Research Center
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston for the David H. Koch Center for Applied Research of Genitourinary Cancers
The Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City for the ‘Building on Success’ campaign and other causes
The Jaffe Food Allergy Institute at the Mount Sinai Medical Center
“Nova”
Koch Biology Building and the David H. Koch School of Chemical Engineering Practice at MIT
The American Museum of Natural History
Deerfield Academy in Massachusetts.
Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The American Ballet Theater
The State Theater of New York at Lincoln Center
LikeLike
You can justify using dirty money any way you want but it is still ill-gotten money being used for nefarious purposes and the Koch brothers always expect obeisance and obedience when they bribe to get what they want or seek more tax breaks.
If money is your god then your morality allows using it any way you wish and justifies anything you can do to get it and of course those who have the most are perceived as being the most important people and anything they want or do is justified.
I personally reject that kind of ethics and morality. You clearly do not.
Would it be better to allow certain people to starve to death and die of easily treatable illnesses and send the mentally ill to prison or to live on the streets in order to maintain a so-called “free market” where a ver few individuals, like the Kochs, suck up all the wealth and are able to buy the courts, the government, and the future?
I think not. You seem to support that status quo. I’m fighting to end it.
LikeLike
Chris,
What part of David Koch’s money was ill gotten? I am not sure about the extent of the businesses. Is it Brawny paper towels or Dixie cups?
I am also interested in what ethics or morality you think I fail to reject. I will certainly attend no operas or ballet performances at Lincoln Center, but perhaps I will get to MOMA and the Smithsonian (in fact I hope to do both). I am likely to watch Nova, and if I or my family members (or anyone else for that matter) could benefit from the medical research or facilities paid for by David Koch’s foundation I will be grateful.
Does that make me an evil person?
You, of course, allow people to starve to death every day. Who died because you did not offer to donate a kidney? How many children have you brought into your family to raise?
LikeLike
The Koch bros. are well known for massive unpaid for oil spills, paying for governmental deregulation to allow pollution and exploitation, anti-affordable healthcare, anti-immigration while paying sub-living wages to immigrantsanti-union activities that deprive working people of a living wage and minimal benefits to allow for the most basically decent living standard.
I do not make excuses for them or,justify their evil by claiming a pocket change gift to a museum or ballet company neutralizes their evil.
I work every single day, through the Catholic Church, to end poverty, hunger, and homelessness.
You create straw,an arguments that claim college can’t be made free and that because billionaires give a few million, a very, very small percentage of their tax deductible wealth, the evil they do justifies their gifts. I disagree strongly. Just like I disagree and fight against Bill Gates’s eugenics in Africa and third world countries.
LikeLike
Chris,
Running a college requires resources so colleges will never be free. Using tax revenue to provide those resources changes who is paying for it, it does not mean that no one is paying for it.
LikeLike
Whoever claimed no one would be paying for it? There you go with you perennial straw man. It should be free to students and paid for by corporations and the 1%. Much like they do it in Europe. Let’s print another trillion like we have wasted on unjustified wars and instead have free world class colleges. It can be done if we keep economists out of it.
LikeLike
Defenders of today’s reprehensible economic policies are protectors of the 1% and thoroughly disgusting.
LikeLike
I have undergrad and graduate degrees in both general and special Early Childhood Education and I spent most of my teaching career earning minimum wage or slightly above it, as do most ECE teachers who work where the majority of jobs are serving children ages birth – 5, in non-unionized private programs, and I could not always afford to put food on the table. So, whenever donations were requested for worthy charities, I would usually have to decline and tell them that I gave at the office.
In fact, I gave virtually every frickin day of my life for decades, as do most P-12 teachers. Compared to that, teaching in a cushy ivory tower college job, with Graduate Teaching Assistants at your beck and call, is just no contest. So stop trying to show off about how altruistic you are, while simultaneously serving as an apologist for greedy, billionaires who fund campaigns to convince the gullible masses that global warming is untrue, merely because environmental regulations cut into their already outrageously high profits. We are not impressed.
LikeLike
Thank you, Mr. Saunders! You have written a perfect letter! Standing up for your principles is important. I have also decided not only to send my solicitation letter back to the Negro College Fund, but to also express my outrage at the group’s acceptance of money from the Kochs.
LikeLike
Everything should be free!
LikeLike
I actually don’t know much about the Koch brothers but I am always astonished by the resentment people at this blog feel toward the successful.
Take Sam Walton for example. Since I didn’t know much about him I looked him up in Wikipedia. Seems to have been an OK dude.
I don’t happen to agree with Bill Gates views on education but I doubt that he’s the Ant–Christ.
LikeLike
Yes yes we all know you carry a deep-seated love for our corporate overlords, no need to shout it from the mountaintop.
LikeLike
Many people who post on this blog are seething with rage and resentment. Why is that?
LikeLike