Bob Shepherd writes on the absurd demands now placed on teachers and principals by politicians, who expect to see higher test scores every year. Step back and you realize that the politicians, the policy wonks, the economists, and the ideologues are ruining education, not improving it. They are doing their best to demoralize professional educators. What are they thinking? Are they thinking? Or is it just their love of disruption, let loose on children, families, communities, and educators?
Bon Shepherd writes:
OK, you are sitting in your year-end evaluation session, and you’ve heard from every other teacher in your school that his or her scores were a full level lower this year than last, and so you know that the central office has leaned on the principal to give fewer exemplary ratings even though your school actually doesn’t have a problem with its test scores and people are doing what they did last year but a bit better, of course, because one grows each year as a teacher–one refines what one did before, and one never stops learning.
But you know that this ritual doesn’t have anything, really, to do with improvement. It has to do with everyone, all along the line, covering his or her tushy and playing the game and doing exactly what he or she is told. And, at any rate, everyone knows that the tests are not particularly valid and that’s not really the issue at your school because, the test scores are pretty good because this is a suburban school with affluent parents, and the kids always, year after year, do quite well.
So whether the kids are learning isn’t really the issue. The issue is that by some sort of magic formula, each cohort of kids is supposed to perform better than the last–significantly better–on the tests, though they come into your classes in exactly the same shape they’ve always come into them in because, you know, they are kids and they are just learning and teaching ISN’T magic. It’s a lot of hard work. It’s magical, sometimes, of course, but its’ not magic. There’s no magic formula.
So, the stuff you’ve been told to do in your “trainings” (“Bark. Roll over. Sit. Good Boy”) is pretty transparently teaching-to-the-test because that’s the only way the insane demand that each cohort will be magically superior to the last as measured by these tests can be met, but you feel in your heart of hearts that doing that would be JUST WRONG–it would short-change your students to start teaching InstaWriting-for-the-Test, Grade 5, instead of, say, teaching writing. And despite all the demeaning crap you are subjected to, you still give a damn.
And you sit there and you actually feel sorry for this principal because she, too, is squirming like a fly in treacle in the muck that is Education Deform, and she knows she has fantastic teachers who knock it out of the park year after year, but her life has become a living hell of accountability reports and data chats to the point that she doesn’t have time for anything else anymore (she has said this many times), and now she has to sit there and tell her amazing veteran teachers who have worked so hard all these years and who care so much and give so much and are so learned and caring that they are just satisfactory, and she feels like hell doing this and is wondering when she can retire.
And the fact that you BOTH know this hangs there in the room–the big, ugly, unspoken thing. And the politicians and the plutocrats and the policy wonks at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and the Secretary of the Department for the Standardization of US Education, formerly the USDE, and the Vichy education guru collaborators with these people barrel ahead, like so many drunks in a car plowing through a crowd of pedestrians.

Exactly Bob, how did you know? You must have been a fly on the wall at my final summative meeting. However, we did end with my evaluator telling me she would want me to teach both of her children and that’s all that mattered to me.
Oh by the way, I am proficient with sprinklings of exemplary. Who cares? Some were told it was mathematically impossible to earn a final rating of exemplary unless, of course, you can lowball your IAGD’s for your SLO’s and then ALL kids “exceed” expectations.
So it’s a numbers game and you learn to juke the stats to survive and this they dare to call “reform”?
Really, is that what this has come to? WTF?
LikeLike
The sad part is, if a teacher does get exemplary, they would be targeted for an inquiry.
LikeLike
Correct. They will be an outlier and the audit trail kicks in to check on why you and you students ” exceeded expectations.”
LikeLike
Or, as in my district, you might be a target, but ALSO, you are expected to teach others in the district about why you are so wonderful. I’m not sure which is worse, the inquiry, or the requirement that you suck up to the district gods of “professional” development.
My one “4” was in, “shows passion for subject.” I hope no one notices, because how am I supposed to teach THAT?
LikeLike
Wait a minute! Isn’t it premature to believe any evaluation rating at the end of the year, when we must wait for judgment day (release of test scores) to really put a stamp on it?
It’s an oxymoron folks. When evaluation doesn’t match test scores, somebody screwed up.
LikeLike
Linda, see my comment below.
We have been on this path for a long time. I don’t (can’t) have “told ya so” sentiments, but we should have seen it coming. I think we have to look back at what it has cost over the last three decades (that is, what raises were negotiated on the “increased accountability down the road” rationale) and we have to try and balance out that cost. For example, maybe folks like my parents and in-laws who are living on a very comfortable pension from the state can get in and help save our schools (and it is likely many are).
I see baby boomers and war babies having gotten the benefit of the cash in on previous promises of accountability. I hope they see that. I hope they see the price their grandchildren are paying now for those negotiations from the last few decades.
LikeLike
“. . . lowball your IAGD’s for your SLO’s. . . ”
Whatever the hell that means?????
Help me out as I am certified AI.
LikeLike
IAGD is indicator of academic growth. SLO stands for student learning objective or slowly losing optimism. It’s a CT thing I believe. But it all bull💩.
LikeLike
Yep, it’s definitely excrement of bovine origin.
Knew the SLO but not the IAGD. Does the “D” stand for data then?
Thanks for the explanation.
LikeLike
Sorry, I left that out…development as though all development is academic. It’s crap.
LikeLike
indicator of academic growth and development
For example, one strong indicator of academic growth and development would be breaking into howls of derision when people use a term like “indicator of academic growth and development”
LikeLike
TAGO!
But are those howls measurable?
LikeLike
Principals are interesting to watch in all of this. I have heard one mention education malpractice (but who likes Common Core), and another say, “there will be a game no matter where you work, so you just have to play the game.”
LikeLike
There are a few typos in that post: its’ for it’s in paragraph 3, for example. My apologies for those!
LikeLike
And when a car is plowed into a crowd of pedestrians, people get killed, lives are interrupted or shut down completely and forever. This is not a movie, a video game, a simulation, a fictional sci-fi account of the future or a bad dream. It is what is happening both to students and teachers, everyday in these hollowed out, unholy hallways. Perhaps the manifestation will take awhile, 15 or 20 years down the road someone may wonder where in a life trajectory, a certain kid went off the rails becoming capable of mayhem. Well, teachers will be able to cite those years in programs that were teach-to-the-test, shame and blame, creative inquiry extinguished, gifts and talents ignored and group cohesion impossible to foster or imagine. Thank you Bob Shepherd and keep banging the drum.
LikeLike
and throwing medication at problems as well. Big beef of mine. Medications we don’t know enough about.
LikeLike
We are fortunate to have leadership, for those who are paying attention, by folks like Dr. Ravitch who realize some serious mis-steps were taken at the highest level for public schooling in U.S. But I really think we were on a very clear path to where we are now–every speech I have read from NC leadership since the 90s has talked about increasing accountability. So here we are.
Now what do we do?
We were charging all the raises and tangible improvements we have had for public schooling to the “accountability credit card” for three decades. The bill has come due and the interest rate is high. And now we are saying, “holy doo doo—what have we done?”
So again. . .
Now what do we do?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on McBlog.
LikeLike
Want to read a poem about Education Deformers and Ed Deform? Try “The Hollow Men,” by T. S. Eliot
LikeLike
But again, let’s take it back a few decades.
And read the words to the song “Slow Surprises” sung by Emmylou Harris in the Horse Whisperer.
LikeLike
You make a good point, Joanna. We’ve had a slow creep of this technocratic Philistinism in education whereby autonomy in the classroom has been gradually ceded first to the district, then to the state, and then, finally, to unaccountable groups (the CCSSO, PARCC, Smarter Balanced) in collusion with federal and state governments and funded by educational materials monopolists.
There’s definitely a boiled frog phenomenon going on here.
LikeLike
Sorry, that is not an informational text.
LikeLike
Funny, Alan! See my note below.
LikeLike
This is what scares me about ed tech. Every one of these ed reform ideas was sold to the public as “common sense” and small scale and well thought out, and every one of them gets taken over by monied interests and national lobbyists and turns into this giant ever-expanding monolith.
It doesn’t matter where you look; charter schools (“neighborhood schools that will innovate and be grass roots driven!”) or testing (“just a benchmark, used as assessments rather than punishments, to IMPROVE, not punish!”) or these now-ridiculous teacher measures, they always, always go crazy with them.
I don’t know what it is. I think the “public good” people in ed reform must not have a whole lot of clout, because they always get absolutely screwed by the other factions.
I don’t want to spend all this money and time measuring teachers. I think it’s obsessive and completely out of control, and I’m not a teacher. Enough already.
I’m not even convinced “the teacher” is the single factor for success of ” a student”. It occurs to me that lets students, parents and politicians completely off the hook, so forgive me but I’m a little skeptical. I’m noticing the focus on teachers lets an awful lot of people completely evade responsibility. Is it even good for kids to tell them everything is up to their teacher? I wouldn’t tell mine that. I don’t think it’s true, for one, and I don’t think it’s a great message for them, quite frankly.
LikeLike
Chiara I agree. It seems that the parents can send their kids to school without breakfast, enough sleep, paper or pencils or encouragement. They don’t check their grades, respond to the calls from the teachers about their kids behavior or instil any real discipline, impulse control or empathy for others.
The students can fail every class (in middle school) put in no effort on standardized tests (why should they?) and completely disrupt the learning environment day after day without getting suspended (we want suspension numbers low especially for black boys).
After a year of this irresponsibility on the part of the parent and child, their low score (inaccurate anyway due to the student’s just clicking on any answers) is the FULL responsibility of their overworked, underpaid and unsupported teachers.
LikeLike
I can’t get over the sense that it’s political. Not all of it, obviously there’s real researchers, etc., this is a legit field of inquiry, but the FOCUS on teachers seems political to me.
Ed reform is obviously more appealing to parents, students, business people and politicians if we all focus on the shortcomings of teachers. That leaves parents, students, business people and politicians without any responsibility! Nice for us, not so nice for you.
I’ve said this before and it’s just my opinion, so take it for what it’s worth, but I do not believe there is as much resentment towards/disdain for teachers as ed reformers would have us believe. I don’t buy it. I can see how teachers would feel that there is, given the toxic environment but I think it’s more pundits, politicians and media than “regular people”.
It seems obviously skewed against public schools to me. I don’t know how they crow about all the “gains” in DC, for example, and somehow public schools are never included. That doesn’t make any sense. I don’t know how they constantly repeat that there are these great charter schools and yet they never mention that there are great public schools. It’s just silly, and obviously biased. There are a LOT of public schools. None of them are doing anything worth replicating or supporting? Come on. That’s nonsense. It’s pure politics.
LikeLike
I’m a just regular people, one of whose kids was totally screwed by low teacher quality two different years, destroying his love of school, and the other of whom was bullied for 7 years in elementary school because she was fat. We endured and coped, but opted out for middle and high school and had a MUCH better experience in a private school at which I taught (at reduced wages over the public schools) SO THAT my kids could go there.
Don’t, don’t, don’t totally dismiss the quality issues with even good suburban public school districts, or the accountability issues as total politics. That is self deluding.
BUT, please teachers, do not underestimate the extent to which the public schools have FAILED to deal with their own personnel problems. That’s why legislatures are making charters, even vouchers, more and more available, to give even poor parents a choice, a chance to opt out.
Public schools are in danger of becoming to education what the Veterans Administration is to medicine, and both are INCAPABLE of reforming themselves. Thus the privatization push for both.
SOME teachers, not all, are stabbing kids in the back, and until ALL teachers accept that fact and purge their own incompetent colleagues, they are stabbing themselves in the back.
LikeLike
Harlan, surely you see that the problem you outlined is not a problem of teachers but rather a problem of administrators? Teachers don’t hire themselves. Teachers can’t police their colleagues while they themselves are teaching. Teacher don’t set policy and determine budgets. All of things that led to your anecdotal story about your children being failed by bad teachers can be laid at the door of the principals who hired them and were paid to supervise them. Principals are not teachers though once many were teachers (that is changing fast under the reform movement). Blaming the teachers for the faults of their bosses is an old, tired trope that has no basis in reality. No teacher I know or have worked with in 20 years wanted to keep bad actors in the classroom because it made their job and their life much, much harder.
Demanding that everyone receive due process is about as Tea Party constitutional-supporting American as you can get. It is not “protecting incompetence” yet it is opposed by the so-called protectors of freedom. Why is that? Conservative, anti-union cant at its worst.
As to the private school experience, you do see the illogic in claiming that because your private school experience was superior to your public school experience that this will always be the case don’t you? Bullying exists in private schools. Poor teaching exists in private schools. Having a parent as an employee of a child’s school surely offered another level of support for your children. You can’t make any broad generalized statements based in your one experience unless you are completely solipsistic. Are you?
Choice is good when there is a level playing field for all providers. I have no problem with choice. I have major problems with government backed plans that handicap and hobble public schools and teachers with draconian, impossible accountability measures with no basis in science or reality while giving charter and voucher schools a mile-long head start with no accountability whatsoever and lots of extra support while letting them pick and choose which students to accept. And you can’t blow that off as no always true; a NC legislator just said that publicly this past week — charter schools should be able to refuse to teach ELL and ESE students otherwise they are just like public schools and outdated. Truth always comes out, eventually. Legalized racism and discrimination and a return to pre IDEA for special needs children. That’s your preferred future, isn’t it?
I also have major problems with anecdotal stories like yours being used to condemn and destroy all public schools. I had the opposite experience of you and your family. My teachers from K – 12 lived in my community, attended church in my community, shopped at the same grocery store as my family, and they were deeply invested in the life of the community. The same was true of the last school I taught in and used to be true of the district I work for — until a non-educator superintendent came in and fired all the people who carried the community history with them.
He brought in lots of non educators and people who left the classroom and are from far away. They have no connections with the community. They have no relationship with the children or their families and it shows in everything they do. Everything is a simple data point to them. No more: “I knew you Mom and taught her in 3rd grade. I also taught your older sister and helped her get into college.” Now it’s: “Your child falls in the bottom quartile. These are your choices for schools. Pick three and fill out the twenty five pages of applications and we’ll notify you by mail if you win the admission lottery. Don’t lose your number! We don’t refer to data points by name anymore.”
You may feel this is an improvement but I certainly don’t and many of the parents here don’t either.
LikeLike
Your personal experience in a good community based public school is the way life should be. There are many of your points well taken.
Let me raise a larger question for you: What would it take to provide equal educational opportunity for all?
LikeLike
Thank for for the kind reply Harlan. I would like to see schools that are run by teachers — through a faculty senate type body — with a business manager to run the physical plant and a parent council that works with the faculty senate to ensure that every child receives the education they deserve.
In my dream world all schools would receive equal funding and those that are close together would pool resources to provide high quality extracurricular opportunities for all children.
I would choose a Montessori-based curriculum that honors the interests of the child, allowing a great deal of choice within carefully selected limits (the role of the professional teacher) and encourages each child to explore their own interests as far as they wish to take them. The simultaneous life skills that are taught in Montessori would be a boon to all in this day and age, with children expected to learn how to clean, prepare and serve their own meals, and take care of their environment.
The old paradigm of principal (who is no longer considered as a principal teacher, the original designation) has morphed into an ego-driven tyranny for too many. Yes, there are some good principals but there are far more, in my experience, who crave power over others, who freeze in their last year of teaching and believe that they were the best teacher ever and whatever they did way back then is exactly what needs to be done now. Few, if any, have any experience teaching full time under NCLB, RTTT, and CCSS yet they are styled as experts who judge and condemn teachers with the power to destroy their careers and lives based upon a checklist.
That has to end as does the bloated, inefficient, and increasingly hostile district bureaucracy system that sucks money out of the classroom again to feed the egos of wannabe “star” superintendents and/or “specialists”. Yes, there are good superintendents but they also are becoming a rare species and have successfully been replaced by too many outsiders who don’t understand children, teaching and learning, and wield their power like a bludgeon.
That is my dream in short form.
LikeLike
You have read my mind as if you were the NSA. Self governing schools funded by tax revenue with a Montessori approach.
LikeLike
Chiaria Duggan: well said. IMHO, you are describing a cynical business plan masquerading as a cure-all education model.
If I may, let me add…
Forgive the repetition, but I again remind viewers of this blog that what the self-styled “education reformers” are mandating for OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN is not what they are ensuring for THEIR OWN CHILDREN.
And who better than the de facto Secretary of Education, Bill Gates, to enlighten us on the subject?
From a piece entitled “Bill Gates tells us why *his* high school was a great learning environment.”
Link: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2012/06/18/bill-gates-tells-us-why-his-high-school-was-a-great-learning-environment/
The article ends so:
[start quote]
What can we conclude from the kind of education Bill supports at Lakeside and the kind of education Bill supports for ordinary students? And not only Bill, but all the rest of the elite prep-school-educated, hedge fund and high finance “school reform” crowd?
I think it’s pretty obvious.
[end quote]
Draw your own conclusions.
😎
LikeLike
To His Honor, Lord Coleman, by Divine Right Absolute Monarch of Education in the English Language Arts in the United States
Narrative is one of the fundamental ways in which we humans are built to make sense of the world. About 80 percent OF ALL writing is narrative. Narrative is found absolutely everywhere. Scientific reports have Methods sections that are primarily narrative.
Our brains make sense of the world by putting bits and pieces together to form coherent narratives. When you dream, neural pathways that have been recently activated are revisited pretty much at random, and the part of your brain that narrativizes attempts to weave those random firings into a coherent story because that’s what brains do. So, for example, I once had a dream that I was on a small prop plane flying into Cuba. Cuba was a white layer cake floating below the plane in an emerald sea. Next to me on the plane was a big, red orangutan smoking a cigar. Well, in the days before this dream, I had flown in a small prop plane, read a story about Castro’s ill health, been to a wedding where there was a cake, and played golf with some hefty guys who were smoking cigars.
The historiographer Hayden White long ago pointed out that we tell ourselves that we have understood historical events when we have imposed particular narrative frames on them.
There is a school of clinical practice in psychology called Cognitive Narrative Therapy that is all about teaching people to tell themselves more life-enhancing narratives about themselves and others–ones, for example, in which they are not continually playing the victim role or the role of the caretaker of an abuser.
A great many studies in cognitive psychology (see the work of Elizabeth Loftus on this) have shown that when people remember, they do so in narrative form, and that much of memory is confabulation–it’s made up; it’s “just so” stories. The extent to which this is so is one of the most shocking and surprising findings of 20th-century science.
Our very idea of Self–out personal identities–who we are–is a story that we tell ourselves. Who is Bob Shepherd? Well, he is that boy in the Doctor Dentons in the creaky old farmhouse reading “The White Snake” with a flashlight under the quilt at night with the rain pounding on the tin roof. We are our stories.
Given the absolutely FUNDAMENTAL nature of narrative and giving its ubiquity, and given the absolutely FUNDAMENTAL nature of personal narrative, it would behoove us to know something about it.
Or, we could spend our time having our students do close reading of paragraphs 23-26 of that report on the production of pig iron and pork bellies to find what evidence the author uses to support the argument that pig iron and pork belly production are suffering because workers aren’t gritful enough.
LikeLike
cx: Given the absolutely FUNDAMENTAL nature of narrative and given its ubiquity, it would behoove us to know something about it and to master its many forms.
LikeLike
Brilliant. Exactly the same shit happens here…
LikeLike
Bob,
Here is a revised version of your scenario for a high poverty renew school in an urban district.
Ms. New Jeresy, I am well aware of your hard work this year with a particularly challenging group of students. However, I have been instructed by my superiors that we are required to have a certain percentage of partially effective teachers and you are one of our lucky winners. Other schools in more affluent neighborhoods in our city are allowed to have 100% proficient staff, but we are not. I regret that you have not performed any ass kissing gestututes. In addition, you are not TFA and you are old. Unfortunately, I have posted an advertisement for your position and you will be placed in the pool. Thank you for your dedication to our students.
LikeLike
Yep. Had to share Susan Ohanian’s snarky take on this too:
“Teacher Notification of CCSS Pre-Test Unauthorized Activity
TO: NH Kindergarten Teacher 63M42
FROM: US Department of Education, Bill and Melinda Gates Substation
CC: Business Roundtable
National Governors Association
Council of Chief State School Officers
US Chamber of Commerce
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Stanford Graduate School of Education
American Federation of Teachers, CCSS Branch
National Education Association, CCSS Tributory
National PTA, CCSS Bureau
New York Times Editorial
Pearson Products and Services
RE: Appropriate Classroom Pre-Common Core Test Materials File No. 28-63-0094-16, QZ18-CCSS, Sec. 14
It has come to the attention of the US Department of Education, Bill and Melinda Gates Substation that there has been recent unauthorized activity preceding the above referenced Common Core test. You have been identified as the for-hire person responsible for the classroom containing the following unauthorized materials
construction blocks;
finger paints and paper;
sand table;
play house with kitchen utensils and costumes;
piano;
improper ratio of fiction and non-fiction books. (See Guidelines 723.94A)
Be aware that “Live free or die” does not mean you may endanger your students’ future as workers in the Global Economy by exposing them to unauthorized materials.
Every public school classroom must be held in sacred trust to ensure our nation’s success in the competitive Global Economy.
Through the work of our research partners and poll results showing the skills most in demand from the Fortune 500, the US Department of Education, Bill and Melinda Gates Substation has determined that the activities resulting from these materials is in violation of Part 276, of the CCSS Pre-Test Plan for Preparing Workers for the Global Economy, Sections 218.27634 to 218.27686 of the CCSS Pre-Test Compiled Laws annotated.
We find the activities resulting from such materials are inherently hazardous to preparing children for their futures in the Global Economy and cannot be permitted. The Department therefore orders you to cease and desist, removing all unauthorized materials from this location and to restore your classroom to a globally competitive work-ready condition.
All restoration work shall be completed within 48 hours, 16 minutes. Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff.
Failure to comply with this request, or any further unauthorized activity on the site, will result in this case being referred immediately for Elevated Enforcement Action. (See your union contract, Subsection 792, p. 53,486.)
We anticipate your full cooperation in this matter.”
— Susan Ohanian
The Eggplant
2014-05-24″
http://www.susanohanian.org/show_nclb_news.php?id=916
LikeLike
LOL. Wonderful.
There are many parallels between Ed Deform and the Chinese Great Leap Forward and Cultural Revolution.
LikeLike
RE: Evaluations and student achievement
One of my students recently prepared a presentation using the physics in phase changes of water as something he learned that was “profound.” His presentation gave me another lens to view the students I assess and the teachers I evaluate. Because measuring academic progress is not fixed by the same physical laws where 540 calories are needed to turn 1 gram (at 100 degrees Celsius) of water to steam, each student’s graph of academic achievement (phase changes) varies. Critical points will be at different levels of achievement measured by different lengths of energy expended. Despite the wishes of teachers, administrators, and students themselves, “growth” is rarely on a 45º trajectory. Instead, growth is represented by moving up a series of stages or critical points that illustrate the amount of energy, by student and/or teacher, spent over time.
How do the lyrics go? “If you become a teacher, by your pupils you’ll be taught.”
FULL POST: http://usedbooksinclass.com/2014/05/31/end-of-the-year-phase-changes-and-student-growth/
LikeLike
and to finish it, “as a teacher, I’ve been learning. . .you’ll forgive me if I boast, but I’ve now become an expert on the subject I like most: getting to know you.”
Teachers know their students. You can’t measure that.
LikeLike
Deformers always cry, “But what’s your alternative?” and expect stone, cold silence.
Well, here’s the alternative:
The big lesson of the quality control movement in industry in the 20th century was that you get continuous improvement when you put line workers in charge of their own improvement, when you give them autonomy and the responsibility for that, they rise to the occasion because PEOPLE ARE INTRINSICALLY, NOT EXTRINSICALLY, MOTIVATED.
This is what the deformers DO NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT PEOPLE. We’re teachers. We understand people. We have to. That’s our job.
You get continuous improvement by getting the fools with their evaluation checklists out of people’s classrooms and creating time in teachers’ schedules for them to meet with colleagues, weekly, to do Japanese-style Lesson Study whereby the go over what worked and didn’t work from the previous week and plan for the week coming up. The strong teachers will recognize the weak ones and help them along. Build Do, Plan, Check, Act into the system. Chuck the demotivating and demoralization, curriculum-and-pedagogy-narrowing, and so completely counterproductive extrinsic evaluation systems. Teachers will rise to the occasion.
When a teacher sees an administrator coming, it should be with pleasure and gratitude. Here is a learned colleague who will pitch in and help. That teacher should not think, OMG, the Thought Police. Time to start performing like a trained seal.
LikeLike
Yikes. I meant Plan, Do, Check, Act.
LikeLike
cx: The strong teachers will recognize the weak ones and help them along. Build Plan, Do, Check, Act into the system. Chuck the demotivating and demoralizing, curriculum-and-pedagogy-narrowing, and so completely counterproductive extrinsic evaluation systems.
LikeLike
But, I think you need to look again at the context and meanings of continuous improvement . I think that this concept applies to tinkering, so you do more with less, make more efficient use of your time and create a better “product.”
It fits with the idea of training, raising the bar, “calibrating” performances of an athlete, or activities on an assembly line.
It might lead to chucking the premises of your work, or a lesson, or design of a auto but in the examples I have seen or read about most of the thinking is tinkering at the margins.
LikeLike
Laura, I have read very, very deeply in the literature on continuous improvement in industry. I understand, fully, your critique, there, and I agree with it. I simply wanted to make the point that in both cases, what we see is that when one backs off and gives people autonomy and tells them, growing in your job, doing better, is your business, not mine, you get great results because PEOPLE RISE TO THE OCCASION when THEY are put in charge. I don’t know if you have ever served on a jury. I’ve done this three times. Each time, I was deeply moved by how ordinary people from many socioeconomic stations and occupations rose to the occasion, took the responsibility handed them very, very seriously. People are intrinsically motivated.
I am a HUGE fan of Japanese Lesson Study because it gives teachers the time and space that they need in which to plan. And they help one another, and they grow. That growth happens naturally in such a system.
LikeLike
But you are absolutely right that this Product metaphor is dangerous. And that I emphatically did not intend.
LikeLike
And that is the breathtakingly important lesson of the Toyota Miracle. No, students are not products. We should absolutely run screaming in the other direction when people start talking in that way. But the most important thing that folks in quality control in the 20th century learned is that you get improvement when you give line workers autonomy and make quality their business. Top-down mandates and punishments and rewards do not work because they are inherently demotivating and often stupid. But when the line worker is empowered and it’s expected that, of course, he or she will be working continuously to improve, and when systems are put into place that allow for mechanisms for those line workers to exercise their autonomy to make improvements, then amazing things happen.
LikeLike
That’s the major lesson that I took away from a period in my life in which I threw myself into studying Juran and Deming and Six Sigma and statistical process control and lean methods. For a time, I gave classes on this stuff to business consultants.
LikeLike
The lessons that I learned, there, are, for most managers, counterintuitive. Surely, they think, you don’t want the inmates running the asylum. But that’s a terrible analogy. People have a fundamental need to feel good about what they do. They want to be great at it. They want to be seen as responsible and as agents of improvement. If you give them the power and resources (for example, the time) to do those things, you get amazing results.
LikeLike
My next door neighbor has been playing very loud and disturbing music all night long, night after night after night. The music contains offensive lyrics and is preventing my kids from getting their much needed sleep. As a result, my children’s progress in school is being negatively impacted. They’re constantly tired, cranky, and have trouble doing their homework. And still the music keeps playing, all night long. Loud, obnoxious,and disturbing music.
I finally called my neighbor and demanded that he stop playing his music. Gave him all the good reasons any rational person would need to stop. Tired kids. Inappropriate lyrics. Schoolwork suffering. Parents being driven crazy. Extremely frustrating. Please, please stop the madness, I mean music, I pleaded.
My neighbor responded,
“I can’t stop playing my music.”
“Why not?”, I asked.
“I am waiting for you to give me an alternative”
LikeLike
The most reasonable alternative is headphones –and then there would be no need for him to stop.
LikeLike
These educational reform efforts are a part of what was written in Naomi Klein’s book “Culture Shock”. The effort to take over all things public and then to privatize everything means ‘”we the people” are being robbed. We must follow the money.
LikeLike
I think you mean Klein’s book, “The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.”
LikeLike
“Grants and appropriations from state and local governments dropped across all sectors from 2006-7 to 2011-12, but public institutions, which are traditionally most dependent on those sources, were hurt the most. Revenue from state and local grants per full-time-equivalent (FTE) student at four-year public institutions dropped to $9,623 in 2011-12 from $12,366 in 2006-7, a 22-percent decline. ”
This ed reform advocacy for public education is going great, let me tell you. Are they just horrible advocates or have they actually convinced themselves that funding doesn’t matter? Why is public ed doing so poorly under their care?
http://chronicle.com/blogs/data/2014/05/30/racial-gaps-in-attainment-widen-as-state-support-for-higher-ed-falls/
LikeLike
So much for union “protection.”
LikeLike
Interested in Educational Reform? Visit my Blog @ http://kennethfetterman.wordpress.com
LikeLike
Thanks for working much harder than I have time to…
Best wishes — Ken
(still following)
LikeLike
Bob,
Thank you for sharing your gift of humor. Your talents allow us to laugh while you keep the message front and center.
LikeLike
@Chris in Florida,
I agree; anecdotes about heinous teachers are always used to “prove” that vouchers/charters are best…why did I miss having any of these horrible teachers, having gone to 6 different high schools? It boggles the mind.
I don’t remember any of my teachers being monsters, Harlan. SO my anecdote stands against yours.
@Chiara: you know, I don’t know if I agree; I think a lot of really unhappy, bitter people enjoy making teachers scapegoats; it feeds something in them.
Last night I went to a party. I got in a conversation about public ed ( first mistake). The psychiatrist that I was speaking with, after listening to me enthuse about the wonderful kids that I teach at my Title 1 school, who are so much more than a test score, AND after asking her to talk to my girls about creating a blog ( she has one), offered this “MY problem with public education, is that so many teachers nowadays don’t encourage the kids, nor believe in them.” She then went on to talk about when she taught at a private school in the early nineties and how she blah blah blah totally is an expert on urban, public, Title One education…having NEVER BEEN IN THAT ENVIRONMENT. Then the kicker, she starts to lecture ME, the person who has been in it, that I need to be aware that there are many high performing title one schools where 100% of the kids pass the test and get into college, what is her proof? “some article, I can’t remember where”. THEN if it can’t get more infuriating, when I cite that TX has 60% child poverty, and that communities and local businesses need to get more involved with local schools, she tells me that she pays property taxes “That is how I support public schools, I am doing my job teachers need to do theirs!” Then she turns with a smug smile and starts to talk about her blog, while I quietly fume.
I honestly was so angry this conversation, that I pictured taking her wine glass, spilling it over her head, and putting her in an arm lock and dragging her to the ground lol. Seriously though, what a total &*^((((!!!
I am really disgusted with these ignorant people who enjoy bashing teachers. I am getting high blood pressure from this.
LikeLike
title one texas teacher: I am sorry that you had a run-in with a member of the well-known (and annoying) League of Extraordinarily Pompous Pundits.*
*[Originally conceived of as a counterpart to the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (riffing off H.G. Wells) but the graphic novel died on the first page—the author couldn’t stay awake long enough to advance beyond the first couple of opening panels.*
Just imagine if you had told this psychiatrist that she was just “projecting” in order to cover up her own deep-seated “psychological disorders”—and when she objects to your tone and language, tell her that her heated “passive-aggressive defense” of her own “revealed deficiencies” is a “sure sign” that you are correct.
Yawn. Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it.
The serious point here is that the most effective way to bash teachers is to first get the general public to hold them in contempt. Once they are considered beyond the pale, no need to listen to them, no need to weigh their opinions against those of others, no need to take them seriously, no need to trust or respect them. Then when the real bashing starts, a lot of folks just avert their eyes because they have learned how not to care.
I also refer you to some of the very cogent comments on this blog about bullying.
And, title one texas teacher, if your friendly neighborhood KrazyTA had been with you I would have risen to your defense. I would have let the air out of the balloon of the Empress you were talking to by pointing out that she doesn’t have any clothes on, because—
“Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand.” [Mark Twain]
😎
P.S. Thank you for all you do.
😄
LikeLike
Granted that one anecdote is not a proof of a general proposition, nor is your anecdote a proof of a general proposition. We could agree that some public schools are very very good but that also students can have very unpleasant experiences in public schools. That they are public does not guarantee their excellence any more than being public guarantees they are not doing a good job. I will try to use “some” as the proper quantifier in the future.
Some posts here seem to make the same ALL/SOME mistake I made, implying that ALL tax funded education should be run by public systems only and that ANY public school is better in principle than any charter or voucher supported school. Not all parents agree, and in their charastic American way seek ‘choice.’
Particularly those of us who loathe the CCSS don’t see it as a plus that some public school systems are enthusiastically embracing them. Some charters are too. Shame on them. If one gets rid of at least the on line assessments, then no need for all those iPads in LA.
Chris in Florida wants teacher run schools. I agree. How do we get there? Would the teachers set their own salaries within block grants of budgets? I’m in favor of that too. I’d even go to direct democracy, not just Faculty Senate. What would be the accountability scheme?
LikeLike
Julian Hellig is promoting a community accountability model. Is that the same as your and my dream, Chris?
LikeLike
Now that you are “Bon,” may we call you “Bon Bon?” Bon Bon Shepherd
LikeLike
Bon = Good
The good shepherd
🙂
LikeLike
I’ll take that. One could say worse about a person. 🙂
LikeLike
Some info. for those of you who like the teacher-run charter school scenario (as do I):
here in Chicago, out of all the charter schools approved by CPS (remember, mayor-appointed–not elected–board), one of the few that was NOT approved was–you guessed it–a teacher-run charter school. And, in ILLAnnoy, the House just killed the bill which would have abolished the State Charter School Commission, the entity which can approve charters for local districts, overriding local school board decisions to reject the application.
(And, I might add, done before recessing for the summer–HEY! THEY don’t work during the summer! Why do THEY get a full {&, believe me, a much bigger salary than teachers} + full–& Cadillac, I might add–benefits {only the best BCBS,dental, etc.} PLUS other perks {mileage, some have cars, drivers…& on & on} AND a guaranteed pension for any # of years served [plus, many of them still do work as lawyers, etc., so also have a second salary]).
So…WHY are people complaining about teachers’
“summer vacations” (in quotes because we all know what most teachers do on these “vacations”–work second jobs to make ends meet, teach summer school, take classes (on which we spend our own money), attend workshops at our own expense, work on lesson plans for the upcoming year, go into the schools at least a week early to set up our rooms, etc. Sorry…a bit off topic, but you see why.
LikeLike
I wish I had this befor I handed in my “Artifacts.” I woulod have used it as the cover.
LikeLike
LOL. now that would be funny!
LikeLike
These evaluations mean nothing in terms of teaching & learning. They are meant to cause harm. Public School teachers must be weakened and destroyed so corporate ed reform can take over. Remember the corporations have only one goal here – scarfing up as much as possible of that $600 billion American education pie. Nothing else matters to them. Students will be monetized. Schools will be profit centers. Teachers will be clerks.
LikeLike