Archives for the month of: May, 2014

We have had our fill of books about what’s wrong with our schools, most written by non-educators with an ax to grind.

Fortunately there is a new genre of books now appearing, mostly from publishers willing to take a chance with a new author. This new genre consists of books written by experienced teachers, who tell about real life in real schools and offer insights into realistic ways to improve schools.

Ken Previti has written an admiring review of David Greene’s new book, “Doing the Right Thing: A Teacher Speaks.”

If you want to know what schools need, ask a teacher, not a newspaper pundit or a financier. As Previti puts it, “Teachers should teach. Eye doctors should examine and prescribe what is needed for better eyesight.

But in this benighted time, decisions are made by legislators, politicians, and bureaucrats. Mandates rain down on schools. Wise teachers like David Greene will help us find our way back to a better path.

Thus far, the concept of VAM–or value-added measurement–has an unbroken record of failure. Wherever it has been tried, it has proven to be inaccurate and unstable. Teacher and student records are erroneous. Teachers are judged based on students they never taught. VAM demoralizes teachers, who understand they are being judged for factors over which they have little or no control.

The major perpetrators of this great fraud are Bill Gates, who bet hundreds of millions of dollars on the proposition that test scores could be a major factor in identifying bad teachers and firing them, and Arne Duncan, who required states to use VAM if they wanted to be eligible to get a share of his $4.35 billion Race to the Top fund.

Yet a third perpetrator was Jeb Bush, whose love affair with data is unbounded. Bush went from state to state selling “the Florida miracle,” which supposedly proved that testing and accountability were the keys to solving America’s educational problems.

One of Jeb’s acolytes was Hannah Skandera, who was chosen as Secretary of Education in Néw Mexico but was never confirmed because of her lack of classroom credentials. As Secretary-designate, she sought to import the Florida model of testing and accountability.

When the state released its new teacher evaluation ratings, teachers and students showed up at the Albuquerque school board meeting to complain about errors. Teachers talked about missing and incomplete data. One student said he was part of a team that placed first in the state in civics, yet he failed his end-of-course government exam.

“James Phillips teaches calculus to Advanced Placement students at Albuquerque High School. He described how the previous week had seen him publicly praised by board member Marty Esquivel, who called him the best math teacher in New Mexico. Just days later, Phillips was notified that the PED had also ranked him “minimally effective.”

“Wendy Simms-Small, a parent of three APS students who’d helped organize the day’s rally, said she started getting active after hearing rumors that hundreds of teachers were planning on leaving the school system.

“I got curious and wanted to find out why,” she said. “As a member of this community over many years, I have never seen the demoralization of professional individuals like this ever before.” She said the pressure of testing had also taken a toll on her kids.

“Private corporations reap great rewards when school systems implement standardized testing,” said Simms-Small, “so it’s my belief that they’re motivated financially to turn our children into pawns for profit.”

At some point, the data-obsessed federal and state policy makers will have to concede that they were wrong or face a massive parent-teacher rebellion. They are literally destroying the nation’s schools with their mad ideas. It is time for a revival of common sense or a public discussion of the true meaning of education.

This is stunning news from Yong Zhao of the University of Oregon.

Zhao, who was born and educated in China, reports that Shanghai education officials may stop participation in PISA.

Zhao, a critic of the international race for test scores, writes on his blog:

““Not interested in #1 on International Tests, Focusing on Reducing Academic Burden: Shanghai May Drop Out of PISA” is the headline of a story in Xinmin Wanbao[original story in Chinese], a popular newspaper in Shanghai. Published on March 7th 2014, the story reports that Shanghai “is considering to withdraw from the next round of PISA in 2015” because “Shanghai does not need so-called ‘#1 schools,’” said Yi Houqin, a high level official of Shanghai Education Commission. “What it needs are schools that follow sound educational principles, respect principles of students’ physical and psychological development, and lay a solid foundation for students’ lifelong development,” says the article, quoting Mr. Yi.

“One of the shortfalls of Shanghai education masked by its top PISA ranking, Mr. Yi, pointed out, is excessive amount of homework, according to the story. For example, teachers in Shanghai spend 2 to 5 hours designing, reviewing, analyzing, and discussing homework assignment every day. “Over half of the students spend more than one hour on school work after school [every day]; Teachers’ estimate of homework load is much lower than actual experiences of students and parents; Although the homework is not particularly difficult, much of it is mechanical and repetitive tasks that take lots of time; Furthermore, our teachers are more used to mark the answers as ‘right’ or ‘wrong,’ while students are hoping their teachers can help them open their minds and point out their problems.”

“Homework is only one of the elements that supports student development,” an unnamed PISA official told Xinmin Wanbao. “Their skills and qualities should also be acquired from a variety of activities such as play, online activities, and games instead of merely completing academic assignments or extending homework time.”

If Shanghai drops out of PISA, this would send a powerful message to the rest of the world.

Heidi Nance, a teacher in El Paso, Texas, tells the story here of a decision that changed her life. She decided to stop pretending that policy and politics had nothing to do with her. She would stop passively supporting policies that she knew were wrong. She made a decision to become an active advocate for her children and her profession. She made a decision to take an active role in shaping events and being a leader. Learn how she reached this turning point in her professional and personal life.

I AM A TEACHER!

Today, there is a war against education. Men in offices are actively making decisions that will affect the way we teach. Today, there is a war against children. Men in offices are actively making decisions that will affect the way children learn. Today, we are their foot soldiers. Every day we march into our classrooms and do the work of these men in offices. These men know nothing of children, or teaching, or education. These men believe they have found the answer: accountability.

I am so blessed. I have an amazing administration that allows me to do what is best for my students. The great Sir Ken Robinson gave an interview and in that interview he explained that for the children we teach, we are their educational system. The children know nothing of policy or politics; all they know is what we do in our classrooms. I took great solace in that, and I decided to make sure that I always did right by the children in my class. But recently I started thinking of all the children in other schools, other cities, and other states. What about those children? And I realized it is not enough. I cannot say I hate what is happening in education and continue to passively support bad policies every day in my classroom.

In March I went to the Network for Public Education National Conference. I met educators, parents, activists, and journalist from all over the country. We all shared a common goal – to take back public education. Public education is paid for by the people and belongs to the people. It belongs to us. And I had forgotten that. I lost my voice, but there, in Austin I found it. It is loud, and it is great. It is my teaching voice. You know the voice I am talking about. The other day my daughter came into my classroom while I was teaching. Later she told me “Mama, you sound weird when you teach.” I joked and told her that when you are a teacher you can have no fear. Children can smell fear. So today, I am using my teaching voice.

I am not afraid.

When I was at the conference, I felt so empowered. My mind raced with ideas. My body vibrated with excitement. I returned from the conference, and all the joy and energy drained from my body, and I thought “now what?” How do I take all my ideas and turn them into action? So that is what I am doing today. I do believe in accountability for teachers, and today I am holding myself accountable. I am accountable to the children I teach.

On Monday, I will walk into my classroom and remember that every child is different. Just like every child walks when he is ready, every child learns he is ready. I will not shame children for not following the time table set forth by politicians. Instead, I will cheer and encourage because I know that every child starts at a different point and that as long as they are moving forward, all the great teachers at my school will help each child to reach his or her full potential.

I will make sure that I only have the highest of expectations for my students. But I will remind myself that the burden of high expectations falls on me. It is my job to make sure that everything I ask of my students is developmentally appropriate, and I will speak up when it is not. It is up to me to support and scaffold the learning of my students. I will make sure everything I say and do in my classroom is supported by research. I will realize that high expectations, without the research to back it up, is the mantra of politicians who support high stakes testing.

I will set individual goals for each of my students. I will realize that by setting inappropriate goals, I will only discourage my children who need encouragement the most. I will demand that every day my students smile, laugh, play, and learn.

I am accountable to myself. I will continue to educate myself. I will read books by great educators and historians like John Kuhn, Alfie Kohn, and Diane Ravitch. I will scrutinize the policy decisions of our state legislators and our Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. I will be outraged when he bullies our state into tying teacher evaluations to test scores. I will support organizations like Network for Public Education, Fair Test, Defending the Early Years, and Texas Children Can’t Wait. I will spend my weekends writing letters to the editor, letters to my congressman, and letters to the president.

I am accountable to the public. I will speak up when people make false statements about public schools and education. I will explain to them that the dialogue about public schools has been hijacked by people who intend to dismantle and profit off of it. I will tell them that our schools are not failing. Instead, movies like Waiting for Superman are propaganda used to promote an agenda that will only hurt our minority and special needs students.

I will speak out when people reference our schools’ international ranking. I will inform them that when we account for children living in poverty, our students are ranked among the highest in the world. I will point out that 23% percent of children in the United States live in poverty. The second highest of any industrialized nation. Our schools are not failing; our society is failing.

I will educate people about the failures of high stakes tests, merit pay, VAM, and retention. I will explain to them why charters and vouchers are not the answer. Every child deserves a high quality, neighborhood school. No child should have to put his hopes and dreams into a lottery. I will inform them that researchers already have the answers to help low performing schools. They include preschool for all children living in poverty. The earlier, the better. Prenatal care for mothers. Safe homes and safe neighborhoods. Wrap around services like school libraries, school nurses and school councilors, smaller classes, and a well rounded curriculum rich in the humanities and the arts. I will remind people that our country has only been successful because we are a country of innovators and that standardized tests stand to crush every ounce of creativity our children have. I quote Robert Schaffer who said, “Believing we can improve schooling with more tests is like believing you can make yourself grow taller by measuring your height.”

I am accountable to my fellow teachers. We must allow our teachers to collaborate, not compete. It does not benefit children to have teachers competing for bonuses or the highest test scores. We cannot set up a system where teachers are afraid to work with the neediest students for fear of losing their jobs. High risk students should not equal high risk employment.

I am accountable to my students’ parents. I will support and educate the parents who are unable to help their children. I will provide them with materials and compassion because they are not the enemy. Inequality and inequity in schools is the enemy. Segregation is the enemy. Years of bad bilingual education policy is the enemy.

I will even have compassion for the so called helicopter parent. I will realize that my silence has allowed for them to lose all faith in public education. The media has fed them a steady diet of failing schools, failing children, and failing teachers. With our unstable economy and a shrinking middle class, it is not surprising that parents are fighting tooth and nail to help their children succeed. Every time we are silent we allow for the continued distrust of educators and for the deprofessionalization of teachers.

I am accountable. I am accountable to myself, the public, my colleagues, my parents, and my students. But even more I am accountable to all the students in classrooms across this vast and diverse country. But I am not afraid. I am a teacher.

I stand before children every day and I teach them. I teach them things they need to know and things they never dreamed of knowing. I teach them to believe in themselves and each other. I teach them to question, and push, and explore. I teach children with no parents and no home, and children with 4 parents and 2 homes. I teach children that they are the difference this world needs. They are amazing and creative and on the verge of excellence, all while being only a small piece of the puzzle that is humanity. I am a teacher.

And so on Monday I will go into my classroom, and I will teach. I will use my teaching voice with my students, and when I leave I will use my teaching voice with anyone willing to listen, and even those who refuse to listen, because I am not afraid.

I am a teacher.

Heidi Nance

This is one of the funniest YouTube videos I have ever seen (excluding a few about dogs and cats).

I promise you, you will not be disappointed. Watch it and forward it to your superintendent or your school board. Remember how I always say that VAM is Junk Science. Here is one of the world’s leading assessment experts, and his message mocks VAM as just plain Junk.

It features the great assessment expert W. James Popham as pitchman for a line of products guaranteed to raise your students’ test scores. Some of them are chewable, some are drinkable and last five hours (he warns that if the effect lasts for longer than five hours, call your physician at once).

Please watch this. You will never think about value-added assessments or rubrics the same way again.

Want to know more about Popham? Read this author bio.He is one funny guy.

When Bill Gates spoke to the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards a few weeks ago, he explained  the Common Core standards by referring to the value of the electric plug in standardizing appliances across the nation. Bear in mind that children are not appliances and that learning is not an electric plug. Otherwise…I am not sure what he was talking about other than the beauty of standardization per se.

 

Now, in defending the Obama administration’s plans to rate every college and university, Jamienne Studley of the U.S. Department of Education says it is no different than rating an electric blender.

 

Think of it. In what way is an electric blender like or unlike a university?

 

Aaron Barlow of Academe Blog takes a stab at explaining why this is not a good analogy.

 

Can you think of a better analogy? Is a university like a toaster? like a microwave? like a late-model automobile? Or what?

Jonathan Pelto, ex-state legislator and prolific blogger, is deciding whether to mount a challenge to Governor Dannell Malloy, based in large part on Malloy’s embrace of the agenda of the privatization movement in Connecticut.

Pelto here describes reactions from friends and foes. 

In my view, this would be an honorable challenge.

Teachers and parents should not vote for a governor–whether it is Malloy or Cuomo–who consistently sides with the billionaires who seek to undermine public education.

Most children in both states attend public schools. Those schools need to be improved and supported, not placed in competition with charter schools that are free to choose students they want and free to push out those they don’t want.

I wish Jon Pelto well and hope that every governor who abandons public education faces a similar challenge.

The Obama administration wants to rate institutions of higher education, based on factors like cost,graduation rate, income of graduates.

 

Most college and university presidents are upset.

 

It didn’t help that one administration official said that comparing the cost and quality of institutions of higher education should be no more difficult than comparing blenders. For some reason, the Obama administration thinks that it can play the role of Consumer Reports and thus improve the quality of higher education while lowering costs. How this will actually happen is anyone’s guess.

 

Many of the university officials pointed out that the institutions that prepare graduates for relatively low-paid professions like social work and teaching would get low ratings, as would those that open their doors to risky low-income students. Those whose graduates go to Wall Street will look stellar.

 

Some said they would be penalized for focusing on the liberal arts and sciences, where the ultimate payoff is less than in fields like engineering.

 

The Obama administration, which is never in doubt about any of its ideas or policies, plans to push ahead, so that it can hold the nation’s colleges and universities “accountable.” There seems to be no tempering its love affair with data. Having no success to date with its policies for K-12, it now plans to bring the same failed ideas of NCLB-Race to the Top  to the nation’s higher education sector.

 

Why doesn’t the administration begin by regulating the for-profit sector, which has a historic record of poor performance and low graduation rates?

 

Well, no, it must apply its metrics of all institutions of higher education. This is NCLB style thinking. Leave these guys alone for a minute and they bring out their weights, measures, and scales.

 

Someone should tell them that the American system of higher education is generally considered the best, most diverse in the world, and it got that way without being controlled by the U.S . Department of Education.

 

 

This post by Mercedes Schneider is a lovely illustrated tribute to her father, who was a veteran of World War II.

I must say, as I grow older, I grow more cynical about war. Since Vietnam, people have been referring to World War II as “the good war.” And there is no doubt that Hitler and his racist ideology had to be stopped.

Yet, I was struck the other day by a friend’s observation that World War II was the only war we ever “won.” We had to. World War I now looks like a family quarrel among the royals, with millions of young men playing out their game, leaving in its wake the bitterness and destruction that led to World War II. Korea ended with no sense of victory. Vietnam ended with a sense of despair and futility. In Iraq and Afghanistan—the people we think we are defending–often wearing the uniform of our ally– shoot our boys and girls in the back or the face.

I am grateful to those who made the ultimate sacrifice, I honor those who served when called to duty. But I am sick of war.

This mother writes in response to an article by a Chicago principal, Troy LaRavierre.

I understand this mother’s anxieties. She wants the same things for her child that Mayor Rahm has at the University of Chicago Lab School. Instead, her son got scripted lessons that were developmentally inappropriate, that were dully academic instead of joyful. If only there were a way to keep the politicians–Bush, Obama, Emanuel, Duncan–out of our classrooms or at least get them to pledge to fight for all children to have the same opportunities and resources that they want for their own children.

She writes:

“Thank you for this and to Mr. LaRavierre’s effort and courage. This is my first post after lurking for months, trying to understand why I had a rising anxiety and confusion as my son began kindergarten at a Chicago Public School Regional Gifted (aka merely accelerated) Program that had just been moved from its overcrowded original location to a Title I, On Probation, AUSL Turnaround. Our RGC classroom was the first time middle-class children and parents were joining the school, which until three years ago had served the children who lived in subsidized housing so notorious they were torn down.

“We withdrew him from the program in March after months of agonizing, multiple meetings with the teacher and principal. Well, I agonized, being a neophyte to urban public education post-NCLB. (I am a graduate of small-town Catholic schools.) My husband, a Romanian who came of age during the worst deprivations and oppressions of Ceausescu’s dictatorship, and also trained as a teacher and coming from a long line of teachers in his hometown, was aghast at what we were encountering in the school and kindergarten especially, if only in terms of how didactic and developmentally inappropriate it was. Its AUSL connection made the system opaque, leadership inaccessible. Title I status meant that parents could not advocate or mobilize as they can in more affluent schools (e.g., no regular PTA, modified Local School Council). I served as Secretary of the Parent Advisory Council, a well-meaning but impotent group that was not taken seriously by anyone in administration.

“Our son immediately began showing signs of stress and anxiety. He is a young five, with a mid-July birthday for a September 1st cutoff. The parents of boys discussed often the punishment system in place in the classroom, which involved a color thermometer, “Think Sheets” (for children who had no formal training in writing or reading), withdrawal of the 20 minutes of “Afternoon Centers” at the end of the day while they sit alone with their backpacks on and perhaps are allowed to read a book. The parents of girls had no idea this was happening.

“Anyway, there are numerous stories I would like to share with the readers here, if you are interested. Between the sociodemographics, the AUSL factor, the pedagogy and philosophy, the “data-driven” mission, we seemed to experience everything discussed here, but from the perspective of parents who had no idea what we had fallen into. The facilities are gorgeous, the location perfect, so we couldn’t understand at first our malcontent. We couldn’t understand why our son was so miserable, although the hour of homework a night gave us a clue. Bar graphs for kindergartners! Use your phonics to tell if “skunk” is spelled with a “c” or a “k” or…both? (Not kidding…he hadn’t even been taught phonics, much less word recognition….) I found myself frustrated; why do I have to do the teaching? The teachers are trained to do this. I don’t know how to teach a five-year old to read or understand mathematical concepts. I need to make dinner. Get the little sister ready for bed.

“Essentially, kindergarten was skipped and our son, a just-turned-five year old, was thrown into 1st grade. The wonderful play-based private Jewish preschool he attended for two years must have let him down. At this kindergarten, the kids are expected to read at 2nd grade level by the end of this year. I’m pretty sure our son has not achieved that, but you should see how much he enjoys reading now that he’s not in that environment.

“Everyone here seems far more erudite on these issues than I. I am interested in your perspectives and insight and heartened that there are people fighting for children’s right to a fully human education, rather than skills training. I feel badly giving up on a public school because I agree they are the foundation of a healthy democracy, but we could not sacrifice our son. My husband and I have doctorates in Literature and Anthropology respectively. There is nothing we value more than knowledge and education. The experience was, to me as an anthropologist, enlightening. There is nothing like participant observation, especially with your child’s mind at stake, to give a little perspective. Our neighborhood school, two blocks from us and two from President Obama’s personal residence and another few from the University of Chicago Lab Schools, might be fine for the early grades, but it is also on probation and busing kids in from very rough neighborhoods. Are we racist/classist/elitist to want to avoid that? I feel as if I am rambling here…there is so much I am processing about this experience.

“I am glad there are people in CPS fighting the system. It is an overwhelming task. This blog has helped me immeasurably trying to discern the problem before we pulled our son and has continued to validate the decision. You see, it was a loss. I cried for a week. I had such hopes for the school, the program, the diverse community, and to be fair, the program works for some kids (who happen to mostly be older girls). The teacher works hard (the weekly rubrics!). The principal seemed to want to do a good job (though my husband described him as a “salesman” or “business manager” rather than an educator. I didn’t really know what he meant.) It seemed perfect. But it wasn’t for our son, who would say when I asked how his day was,” Good. I stayed on Green.”