It is National Charter School Week, President Obama issued a proclamation in their honor (did he forget National Teacher Appreciation Week?), and here is the best piece yet on what a sham industry this is.
Peter Greene gives sound advice here on how to score big in the charter industry.
It gets funnier as he goes on, so I am only posting the beginning. You have to read the whole thing to get to the best parts!
**********************
Peter Greene writes:
Diversify!
Not the school– your portfolio. Set up multiple companies. Create a holding company that owns the building, and charge the school rent and facilities fees. Create a school management company, and hire yourself to run your school. Form your own custodial contracting company. Write your own textbooks, and then sell them to yourself. Buy a loaf of bread and a jar of peanut butter and set yourself up as a lunch concession with ten dollar sandwiches.
Don’t Overlook the Obvious
“Non-profit” just means “not wasting money by throwing it away on stockholders.” Taking money hand over fist that you can’t call profit? Just put it all in a big wheelbarrow and pay it to yourself as a salary. There’s no legal limit to what you can be paid as the charter school operator. The only limits to your salary are the limits set by your own sense of shame. If you have no shame, then ka-ching, my friend. Ka. Ching.
Ain’t Too Proud To Beg
Have a fundraiser. When you wave schools and children at people, they fork over money like crazy, whether you actually need it or not. The only way it could work any better would be if you found a way to work in the American flag and puppies.
Students Are Marketing Tools
Students have a job at your charter, and that’s to make your charter look good and marketable. If they won’t do the job, fire them. If they aren’t for sure going to graduate, fire them before senior year (100% graduation rate makes great ad copy). If they are going to create bad press for disciplinary reasons, fire them.
Students Are Also The Revenue Stream
The other function of students is to bring money in while not costing any more than is absolutely necessary. Never take students with special needs (unless you can use them to make the school look good without incurring extra costs). If a student will require extra disciplinary or academic intervention, fire him.
Always remember, however, that students need to be fired during Firing Season– late enough to hold onto the money they bring, but early enough that they won’t hurt your numbers.

There is a manual out there somewhere because it has become a “new market” to exploit and it is happening everywhere.
LikeLike
Thanks, Peter Greene. The tongue-in-cheek analysis is worthy of an audience as big as Huffpo’s.
I won’t hold my breath.
LikeLike
This article, although tongue-in-cheek and even accurate in many places, is extremely offensive to those of us working our tails off everyday to provide high quality educational opportunities for kids who have been under served by their home schools. Never once have we turned away or pushed out a student for test scores or disabilities. Our staff does more for less not to line our pockets, but because we love what we do and we are passionate about education. As educators we need to stop fighting with each other and recognize there are so many larger issues we need to unite around.
LikeLike
He left out to important ones: use the new markets tax credit to get hedge funds to donate millions of dollars that they can double over 7 years and then seek out overseas millionaires to donate even more money so they can apply for EB-5 visas.
LikeLike
Yes, since charter schools are, among other the things, a real estate play, operators in low real estate-cost regions will use the tax credit to build and enrich their investors.
In high real estate-cost regions, the model is to get reliable politicians to turn over existing public school facilities to the edu-privateers, as is happening in NYC.
LikeLike
Spot on article, it was cited in Huff Po. Speaking of…Has anyone noticed that they have suddenly been printing more anit-privitization articles/blogs? They are following the money, and realizing the tide is turning…too bad that they gave Rhee such a huge platform these last few years…Huff Po makes me a bit cynical: they will publish whoever and whatever seems to be co-opting the biggest slice of the “liberal” conversation. It is great that they are giving more voice to Diane and Greene, but I am wearing my “not impressed” face: it is all for more readership: “ka-ching, my friend, ka-ching”
LikeLike
Thanks for the referral. Greene’s work deserves “Front Page” placement. The issue goes beyond categorization as “education”.
If citizens understood the corrupt takeover of the schools, the votes in the legislature would not be so one-sided.
LikeLike
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/04/25/educators-youre-invited-teacher-appreciation-white-house-social
LikeLike