The New York Times published a story about the political consultants to Mayor de Blasio who have been paid $236,000 to lobby in Albany for universal pre-kindergarten, which would help poor children across the city.
The New York Times has not written a story about the more than $4 million spent by hedge fund managers to gain preferential treatment for privately managed charter schools and to guarantee that they will never be moved out of public space without their consent and never be required to pay rent and never be subject to public audit. Some of the details about the billionaires behind the ad blitz were used as background in a Times’ story about de Blasio’s conciliatory speech at Riverside Church, where he reached out to the charter sector. There is an irony that a church associated with social justice was the setting for the city’s first progressive mayor in decades to be compelled to humble himself to the titans of Wall Street.
Why does the Times finds it newsworthy that the Mayor and his allies paid $236,000 to lobby for pre-school for all children, but it is not newsworthy that Wall Street billionaires shell out $4 million to protect schools that enroll 6% of the city’s children, schools that have the power to kick out any students they don’t want, schools that take few or no children with disabilities, and half as many English language learners?

As they say, If you steel small amount, then you are a thief and your place is prison. But if you steel billions, then you are a billionaire and no one can touch you.
LikeLike
I have a folder of letters to editors, columnists and ‘education’ reporters at The NY Times, going back for years, as they consistently avoided any real solutions to the disaster occurring in NYC, as the planned destruction of public schools began with the removal of the professional, experienced veteran teachers.
I never received a reply, and none of my letters were published.
The NY Times, however, consistently offers articles on technology in the classroom, and pro-charter school rhetoric. They are part of the propaganda machine, and I thank YOU for speaking out, because I am a mere teacher with no voice.
LikeLike
Thank you for persisting in pursuing this… And I just read Eva Moskowitz’ profile in the Talk of the Town section of last week’s New Yorker where it was reported that she “…left her coat and handbag with Adriana Trovato, one of her four assistants” before visiting a classroom. As a retired Superintendent with 29 years of experience I know of NO public school Superintendent who has four assistants… and I can’t think of a single school board that would support using taxpayers money to fund four assistants for any administrator… but I guess if you are a private entity you don’t need to answer to the taxpayers
LikeLike
She “left her coat and handbag with…one of her four assistants…”
Who does she think she is?
LikeLike
Freedom of the press doesn’t mean fair and balanced reporting or honesty. That ended when President Reagen and then the first Bush made sure the Fairness Doctrine was dead and gone.
What the New York Times is doing is cherry picking the facts to demonize de Blaiso. By leaving out the other half of the story, the public is only exposed to what the NYT wants them to see.
This is what tyrants always do with the media they own/control. This is what the Chinese Communist Party does with its state owned media. No difference. But in China, at last the people know not to believe what they are fed through state owned media. Instead, they believe the opposite.
The Chinese are used to this but too many Americans aren’t and they are easily fooled.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thank you for the historical perspective, which I well remember, but recent generations seem to still view the gray lady as possessing her once-admirable reporting. The snarky, unbalanced article in question has– as so many NYT articles– no comments section, purporting itself to be reporting rather than opinion.
LikeLike
Like Lincoln said about “fooling people”.
LikeLike
http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/03/back_to_school_for_state_rep_a.html
The Cleveland Plain Dealer wrote a full-throated defense of publicly-woned, public-run schools this week.
I almost fell off my chair. They went so far as to say that charter schools in this state have “mostly been a bust”.
Which is true in Ohio, but no one’s said it as bluntly before.
LikeLike
What a complete nut job!!! Did you see what his wife wrote. This man is on an education committee. How far down does the Republican Party plan on going. We live in one of the most idiotic times in America. Charters school are the biggest scam on the planet. I think this article shows that the winds of change could be blowing.
LikeLike
He’s the vice chair of the education committee.
I wrote him about privatizing public schools, because I live in a conservative district (not his) and I don’t believe people want to turn their public schools over to private owners.
I asked him whether he would repeat what he wrote to voters when he’s out and about in his district, because the truth is he would never do it. He’d lose the next election. He knows that. He knows people in that district don’t want their local public school privatized.
What’s interesting about it is how quickly he backed off that position.
We’re told again and again that public schools are failing and that there’s some kind of bipartisan broad public consensus that people are just dying to get rid of public schools, and I think it’s bullshit, and when he was called on it. he ran away. He knows its bullshit.
I think we have to challenge these politicians. Ask them to be specific. What is their intent? Are they privatizing public schools, and if they are, why don’t they run on that?
The truth is they WON’T run on it. They dodge and weave and run away.
I think we should ask them “do you value public schools and if so, why do you value public schools?”
Specifically, PUBLIC schools. Why do we have them and why do we value them? They should answer these questions directly. If they don’t value our schools, we need to know that.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I understand from your posts that Ohio has gone gung-ho in support of charters. (Vouchers, too?) I’m especially disappointed that this seems to be the direction being taken by a once-liberal community (Columbus)? Yet Ohio still shows up in the top 10 states for per-pupil funding, w/a decrease of only .04% in last year. How do you put this together? Could it mean there’s hope for Ohio to turn around?
LikeLike
Because they are enablers.
Best,
Carol Gamm
LikeLike
By the way, charters take 1/3 as many ELL as public schools, and from all accounts, these students are not very “ELL-y,” if you know what I mean. The charters classify many children as ELL even when they’re clearly not to spruce up their dismal numbers.
LikeLike
The NYT is a joke. Too many newspapers today serve the filthy rich. So disgusting.
LikeLike
Chiara – I hope The Plain Dealer reports on what the Stebelton/Brenner committee did to SB229 yesterday. They have no intention of slowing down the anti teacher/anti public school attacks. I’m sick.
LikeLike
I see the role of the NYTimes much like that of Arne Duncan.
Public schools receive stern, finger-wagging lectures (and nothing else) while charter schools are celebrated and encouraged. It’s like carrots and sticks, except one set of schools receive only the stick.
I don’t even know if they recognize the bias themselves at this point, it so permeates every editorial and statement. As far as I’m concerned, in the case of both the NYTimes and Duncan, they are no longer credible on “improving” public schools. The fact is they have absolutely no interest in “public schools”. My overall sense is one of impatience, that they wish the public schools would hurry up and close already so they could move to the charter system they prefer.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx NYT is clearly purely political, so what we need to do is make our parental- taxpayer-voices so loud that they will simply have to report us. Right now they seem to think their job as a once-progressive voice is to support everything that is Obama/Duncan/ the ‘black vote’. As Afro-American groups begin to look beyond ‘the soft bigotry of low expectations’ & see that public-school closings & the charter-school movement exacerbates inequality, they will speak up, & we need to support them.
LikeLike
Oh, it’s that doggone liberal media with their left-wing bias, again.
LikeLike
Every week, my school receives transfers in from charter schools that have failed their children. I work In Far Rockaway Queens. If their child has a disability, they can’ service them. If they have a learning problem or a behavior problem, these schools have absolutely no compunction about sending these parents and students packing back to the “public schools”. We take them with open arms, services cut, overbooked special education classes, not enough resources for at-risk services, large class sizes, lack of supplies, and teachers who expend enormous energy and concern to help them. These same teachers are castigated by the press for not performing miracles, judged on test scores when the system has stacked the deck against them, only to return the next day and try again.
I spoke to a math teacher today who is a wonderful gal; bright, inquisitive, experienced, who basically told me that she was looking for a transfer, NOT because of the students, but because of the burn out from the negativity towards the profession. I told her we needed her. Our students are poor. They have vast problems and need every single teacher who cares. I don’t know what she will do. My heart is heavy. Multiply her by thousands. Charters take in only those students who can make it. Their curriculum is narrow, and services limited. Why are they considered such a panacea? It is a PR trick….gas lighting parents and the public.
So Diane, tell me, isn’t it really about a tale of two schools? The haves and the have nots. Public education has been starved and then found wanting for starving. Kind of like what they did to special education by cutting services years ago, then saying it wasn’t working for our children.
We can’t win this without the power of the vote and acquiring some wealthier allies who are on OUR side.
LikeLike
Everyone has a breaking point. We can’t blame anyone for leaving. What comes first?
A. a teachers health and well being
B. children who live in poverty
If you wanted to answer B, consider that when a teacher’s physical and mental health goes (it’s called burnout and it’s often accompanied by PTSD), they aren’t going to be able to help those children
Teaching in America—even in affluent schools far from poverty—is not easy. The political pressure and blame game from greedy fools takes its toll even on the most dedicated teachers.
LikeLike
“We can’t win this without the power of the vote and acquiring some wealthier allies who are on OUR side.”
Don’t forget that the United States (13 colonies) defeated the most powerful empire the earth has ever seen and won its freedom. The British Empire had the wealth and the military might, but those colonists had anger and dedication on their side.
Although wealthy allies would be nice, we can win this without any billionaires joining us, and that’s because almost 80% of Americans think highly of their local schools (and most of those adults attended those same schools).
Combine the might of almost 253 million Americans against twenty or so billionaires and their lackeys and who do you think will win this war in the end. This is why the false reformers are pushing so hard to win battles in one state after another. They may be greedy fools but they aren’t stupid. They have a small window to pull this robbery off and then it will close. Crooks seldom consider that they might end up paying for their crimes during the crime.
The real challenge is to inform and educate those 253 million Americans. For that, we need a lot of simple, easy to understand Blog posts of 500 words or less that can be ReBlogged, Tweeted, shared, etc.
Let’s not lose site of the fact that the average American reads at a 5th grade level and has a short attention span. Keep the message flowing and keep them easy to read and as simple as possible.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx My heart goes out to you. I know Far Rockaway from long ago. Do you find that your administration provides a bulwark against the negativity toward the profession? If yes, is your colleague getting the negative vibes from the community? I would like to think that a positive-reinforcing admin could hold its own against ignorant community peers, but perhaps that’s not enough. When I was a young teacher, I needed the support of parents & administration; the community at large was not as important.
LikeLike
After years of getting the NYT, I have stopped my prescription. It is so disappointing to see their bias towards charter schools as well as their lack of coverage of the Trans Pacific free trade agreement and the upcoming Supreme Court decision on McCutcheon -v- FEC, which will give privatizers even more power in controlling us and our government. Very, very disappointing.
LikeLike