A fascinating article in Education Week describes a verbal tiff between the Council of Chief State School Officers and the leaders of the two major teachers’ unions.
The Chiefs, as they are known, are the state superintendents. CCSSO received at least $32 million from the Gates Foundation to “write” and advocate for the Common Core, and no matter how much parents and teachers complain and demand revisions, the Chiefs “won’t back down.” They made their certainty and intransigence clear to the union leaders.
The AFT and the NEA also were paid millions by Gates to promote the Common Core, but the unions have members and both Randi and Dennis have vocally criticized the implementation of the Common Core. In some states, the rollout has been nothing short of disastrous.
Randi Weingarten was unusually outspoken in criticizing the rush to impose the Common Core, and she warned the Chiefs that the standards were in serious jeopardy. The article makes clear that while Randi is listening to teachers, the Chiefs are not. Their attitude on full display was “full steam ahead, the critics are wrong, there is nothing but anecdote on their side.” You would think they might have reflected just a bit on the terrible results of Common Core testing in New York, where only 3% of English language learners passed the tests, only 5% of children with disabilities, only 16-17% of African American and Hispanic students, and only 31% of all students.
The advocates of Common Core claim that the new standards teach critical thinking and reflection, but there was no evidence of either critical thinking or reflection from the CCSSO or the other organizations paid to promote the standards.
Andrew Ujifusa writes:
“Anxiety over the Common Core State Standards was on full display Tuesday during the Council of Chief State School Officers’ annual legislative conference. Leaders of the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, the nation’s two largest teacher unions, squabbled with state K-12 chiefs over how teachers and the general public perceive the standards, and how well they are being implemented in classrooms.”
Weingarten told those present that they do not understand how angry many parents and educators are. During the discussion, Weingarten “said that in cases like New York state, the poor rollout of the common core had led to “immobilization” among teachers and a distrust that those in positions of authority knew how to do the job right.
“Weingarten added that she expects that many of her members would call for outright opposition to the standards during the AFT’s summer convention, even though both the AFT and NEA support the standards and Weingarten said she wouldn’t back away from the common core.
“On the subject of transitioning to the common core, Weingarten told the chiefs, “The field doesn’t trust the people in this room to have their backs.”
“During the same discussion, NEA President Dennis Van Roekel, while he said the union remained squarely behind the standards themselves, also expressed concern that teachers were not getting enough time to learn the standards themselves, to find common-core aligned curricular materials, and to talk to parents as well as each other.
“Those remarks triggered an irritated response from Massachusetts K-12 chief Mitchell D. Chester, who said that the two national unions seemed to be “condoning” strident and vocal common-core foes “at the peril of those [teachers] who are moving things ahead,” an accusation Weingarten denied……
“Weingarten responded that attacking her for being the messenger of concerns about the standards missed the point, telling the state chiefs, “People think we are doing terrible things to them, parents and teachers alike.”
Kati Haycock of Education Trust defended the Common Core. The Gates Foundation paid Education Trust $2,039,526 to advocate for the Common Core.
Michael Cohen of Achieve, which helped to write the standards, strongly defended them.
Gates has paid many millions to Achieve to write and promote the Common Core:
“Gates money also flowed to Achieve, Inc.; prior to June 2009, Achieve received $23.5 million in Gates funding. Another $13.2 million followed after CCSS creation, with $9.3 million devoted to “building strategic alliances” for CCSS promotion:
“June 2012
Purpose: to strengthen and expand the ADP Network, provide
more support to states for CCSS implementation, and build strategic national
and statewide alliances by engaging directly with key stakeholders
Amount: $9,297,699”

Give me a break…. both union heads still back the Common Core… call me when that changes… https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjGx1aVCYAANuIJ.jpg:large
LikeLike
Ditto. My reaction exactly.
LikeLike
What Sahila said!
LikeLike
here’s a message consistently ignored by both national union presidents: Teachers DO NOT WANT COMMON CORE. PERIOD.
LikeLike
Correct. We don’t want it because it wasn’t presented buffet style. We all had the same plate of nonsense shoved in our faces and then down our throats. CCSS+PARCC+APPR+DATA MINING. It was a package deal from the get go. Its the ONLY way their business model works.
If you say, “The standards are fine, its just the implementation that was rushed.” your are buying into their snake-oil con job. Odds are they secretly hope it is delayed. PARCC and SBAC are already falling behind schedule. In the meantime how many wasted years should your child sacrifice on the neo-liberal altar?
LikeLike
“you are buying into their snake-oil con job”
precisely
The Common Core was a prerequisite for a particular BUSINESS PLAN for ed tech to be used for the training of the children of the proles (everyone else’s children). The Common Core is the engine that drives the education deform juggernaut. The Common Core is PRIVATELY HELD, and the Brookings Institution just called on the CCSSO and NGA, who hold the copyright on these amateurish “standards,” to start enforcing that copyright and so become the de facto curriculum and pedagogy Thought Police in the United States.
Kill these amateurish standards. Make them voluntary. Encourage the development of competing standards. That way lies innovation. Otherwise, support for the Common Core is support for mediocrity and tyranny.
LikeLike
NY Teacher: a “package deal”?
Unimpeachable testimony from an articulate insider of the self-styled “education reform” establishment confirms your assertion.
Dr. Frederick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute, in a posting on his blog of 12/16/13, as reported on the website of deutsch29:
[start quote]
In truth, the idea that the Common Core might be a “game-changer” has little to do with the Common Core standards themselves, and everything to do with stuff attached to them, especially the adoption of common tests that make it possible to readily compare schools, programs, districts, and states (of course, the announcement that one state after another is opting out of the two testing consortia is hollowing out this promise).
But the Common Core will only make a dramatic difference if those test results are used to evaluate schools or hire, pay, or fire teachers; or if the effort serves to alter teacher preparation, revamp instructional materials, or compel teachers to change what students read and do. And, of course, advocates have made clear that this is exactly what they have in mind. When they refer to the “Common Core,” they don’t just mean the words on paper–what they really have in mind is this whole complex of changes.
[end quote]
Link: http://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/the-american-enterprise-institute-common-core-and-good-cop/
I would only add that there is a better than 98% “satisfactory” [thank you, Bill Gates!] chance of certainty that Dr. Hess is correct.
😎
LikeLike
Mercedes,
Please add: Teachers DO NOT WANT APPR IN WHICH TEST SCORES ARE TIED TO EVALUTATIONS . . . .
LikeLike
I feel a bit naive. Can you explain how PARCC & SBAC are falling behind schedule? Is it because there are holes in the program? Not up and running…?
LikeLike
“Unity”, a popular front, an alliance of groups is an efficacious approach by those who resist the ‘reformers’. The significant problem that can’t be brushed aside is that the putative leaders of two key unions are out of step with their rank and file membership. Both leaders have not forsaken their support for the ‘Standards’, merely supported delayed implementation. Their position stands in stark contrast to the interests of their rank and file membership, as well as students, parents and schools. Moreover, despite severing ties with the Gates Foundation and supposedly making plans to return Foundation funds, the funding nexus and failure to completely refute the ‘Standards’, casts a shadow on becoming critical “Unity” representatives. Can they be trusted? Should the be trusted? Neither leader has earned the trust of the opposition community. When they ditch their modified support of the ‘Standards’ and come full circle, then a”Unity”, popular front, is both justified and meaningful. I do no advocate ideological purity, merely a far more cautious and skeptical approach.
LikeLike
What if they did listen? Do we want to “fix” Common Core? It is a Bill Gates boondoggle meant to tie education ever closer to the tech industry.
LikeLike
Randi needs an intervention…. she’s backed herself into a corner…. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjGtFaCCMAAG2ue.jpg:large
LikeLike
Choices and Loyalties…. so many complications when one is the boss of a teachers’ union #InsideTheMindOfAUnionBoss https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1.0-9/1524602_10202721170702918_1541724146_n.jpg
LikeLike
She needs to be in a corner to figure out where her loyalties lie. CCSS were illegitimate from the beginning. Nothing can make them “better.” It is interesting to see my local BOE seems to have heard some of the criticism and is starting to ask questions. Criticism is couched in “professional” terms by administration when talking about the piecemeal dissemination of information. I suspect that some private conversations are a little more pithy.
LikeLike
Message to Randi – it’s OK – others have realised they were wrong, owned it, apologised and moved on – like Diane ….. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjI1BzLCUAAUg7v.jpg:large
LikeLike
Randi’s stuck between a rock and a hard place:
#InsideTheMindOfAUnionBoss5 It’s so hard to change direction when power and money are involved. #plutocracy #edreform
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjJwKpsCAAA-eLa.jpg:large
LikeLike
The chance for #edreform glory now, and a secure future after – @rweingarten @AFTunion #InsideTheMindOfAUnionBoss
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjMBRHRCYAA4Ue-.jpg:large
LikeLike
poor Randi! She cant do the right thing & pull a 180 on ed reform cos she has too much at stake #InsideTheMindOfAUnionBoss
LikeLike
it’s a tough job, but someone’s gotta do it…. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BjOdPNKCMAEh7_r.jpg
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Transparent Christina and commented:
Governor Markell should listen, but he won’t. That’s why the DSEA membership unanimously rebuked him last Saturday. Tin ear and all.
LikeLike
Weingarten and Van Roekel are nothing more than puppets of the Gates Foundation and no longer represent teachers, period. We are in desperate need of new leadership.
LikeLike
I guess I support the Chiefs on this one. Let them barrel headlong into it and let CCSS collapse of its own weight. If we take time to slow down and implement CCSS the “right” way, there’s a much better chance we’ll be stuck with it for a very long time.
LikeLike
Absolutely! Full speed ahead. Bring it on Bill! Its better to burn out then to fade away.
LikeLike
Bill Gates is Public Enemy #1 and should be indicted for meddling in the democratic process because he is bribing state and national leaders all over the country.
Imagine what would happen to an average person who offered a $100 to a governor, representative or school board member to push their own agenda.
LikeLike
Lloyd, you are right about that. It should be illegal to hand out millions of dollars to buy the nation’s education system.
LikeLike
This is nothing more than bribery. What amazes me is how easy it is to buy people.
LikeLike
It’s always been easy to buy many people but you can’t buy them all. Have you read “The Bully Pulpit” by Doris Kearns Goodwin?
LikeLike
Is this post another paean to Randi Weingarten?
Oh, Diane, Diane, Diane.
Randi Weingarten has been a dollar late and a dollar short on everything related to the Common Core that she’s touched, except for the Bill Gates money. Dennis Van Roekel is no better. Both have sold teachers down the Common Core river. They erred. They misjudged, badly. Now they are simply trying to do damage control.
Let me remind readers that Weingarten penned an article with “Hurricane Vicki” Phillips of the Gates Foundation in which they said (falsely) that it was critical for American public education to “align teacher development and evaluation to the Common Core state standards.”
And, here’s the NEA position statement on Common Core:
“NEA believes the Common Core State Standards have the potential to provide access to a complete and challenging education for all children. Broad range cooperation in developing these voluntary standards provides educators with more manageable curriculum goals and greater opportunities to use their professional judgment in ways that promote student success.”
Say what?
Even worse, the NEA’s chief policy analyst (how much does SHE get paid?) repeats the nonsense spewed by the corporate “reformers.” She says “Students need the knowledge and skills that will prepare them for…our global economy.” Does this woman not actually read? Or think?
As I keep noting, the U.S. already IS internationally competitive, and when we drop in the World Economic Forum’s competitive rankings it’s because of stupid economic policy choices that piled up big deficits and debt and plunged the nation into the Great Recession. The corporate-style “reformers” –– from ExxonMobil to the Waltons, from Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan to State Farm and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, from GE and IBM to Microsoft and Intel –– supported all of those stupid (but for them, very lucrative) policy choices. And they are all lobbying quite hard for more of the same.
When the top teacher representatives don’t do their homework, and resort to reciting bad “research” and inane pronouncements, then teachers truly are in trouble.
Such is the current state of public education in the United States.
LikeLike
Democracy, to begin with, you hide behind a pseudonym. I don’t. Tell us who you are, since you put yourself in a position to take issue with me. If you had been at the NPE conference in Austin, you would have heard my strong recommendation that we not fight among ourselves, because that will help the guys outside the tent. If Randi is moving in incremental steps to support the ideas of NPE, I welcome it. We oppose test-based accountability, we oppose high-stakes testing, we oppose closing schools based on test scores, etc, go to the website, and we strongly support public education and evaluation that is not based on test scores. Randi recently came out in opposition to VAM. I applaud it. She announced at NPE that AFT would no longer seek Gates funding. That’s good news. It is not possible to win a battle if you fight among yourselves. I welcome the changes Randi has made, and I look forward to more changes ahead. You have to decide whether you want to help us win, or just squabble over ideological purity. I know too much about the history of failed uprisings to join the squabblers or to encourage them to keep on attacking each other. That’s just dumb.
LikeLike
I have a much younger colleague and friend who is still teaching. He said the Common Core as a concept is not a bad idea but it’s how they are implementing it that he questions. Like most teachers he distrusts lock step curriculum dictated from on high. He told me in a recent phone conversation that he is now expected to follow a rigid plan to implement the Common Core in his classroom—a master plan that leaves no room for teacher involvement. It’s as if he were being turned into a robot programmed to follow a step-by-step script.
By who? Bill Gates in partnership with President Obama and a pack of other billionaire oligarchs.
My friend is also struggling to keep his enthusiasm for teaching alive as the pressure mounts to unbearable levels to follow the Common Core script all the time leaving no room for innovative lessons.
In fact, he’s so busy doing his job as an English teacher he doesn’t have the time to join in the debate. I suspect that there are many just like him—dedicated teachers who are pouring their time, heart and soul into teaching to reach as many kids as possible and they don’t know all the details of the Bill Gates campaign to force feed Common Core down teachers throats as a way to fire them and destroy their unions while using it to judge children.
Neil is one of those dedicated, hard working teachers. I started teaching at age 30 in 1975 after having worked in the private sector for several years out of college. Neil started teaching in 1989 right out of college. Even when he takes the summer off, he works on curriculum ideas to improve the learning environment in his classroom the following year and he doesn’t earn a cent from the time he does that during the summers.
If the national leaders of the teachers unions are changing direction to support teachers and fight back against Common Core as it is being forced on the states, then we should not be criticizing them for what they did but praise them for what they are doing now. And keep a close eye on them to make sure they don’t reverse course.
Common Core should be offered to the states to consider with no stick or carrot punishment or rewards attacked.
Then if the state thinks Common Core is worth the effort, they introduce it to all the school districts so schools have time to pilot the program for a year or two in a few classes in each district where veteran teachers volunteer to use the program and report back on how it works and how that district should implement it. This is how we used to adopt textbooks back in the 1970s and 80s.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Diane much as I adore & revere you, I hope you are not calling for unanimity on your blog– perhaps the only bastion where educators & parents can lock horns over what ‘a better education for all’ means. Though in gov’t forums we surely are more united than divided in our anti-deform platform, I for one appreciate ‘democracy’s bracing proclamation that the same people who brought us the financial collapse, via no-holds-barred capitalism, ascribe to the unwritten agenda that Common Core & its Siamese twin, NCLB/ RTTT assessment, encourages the plundering of the public ed purse via privatization, & win-win, via the selling of curriculum to those schools which remain public.
LikeLike
Diane, your comments infer that parents and teachers are on the same side as Randi, when she has chosen her side with Bill Gates and his money. When will she announce the return of that money? When is she going to address the quality of materials that are being forced on her members and stop saying that her members are just not prepared. They need more time? Her staged opposition is tiring. You no longer need to defend because you are friends. It may be time to examine “Go Math”, the addiction for “Smartboards”, and the effects of constant close reading passages as an historian. Teachers coming out of schools think that teaching is operating a smartboard and a CC textbook. I mentioned to Peter Green that you and Deborah Meiers are silent on these issues, which are the most damaging to children and teachers and introduce a delivery system for the State to control how children think and don’t think.
LikeLike
Your reference to failed uprisings is insightful, Diane. Your training as a historian is showing there. If we are to stop ed deform, we have to have a big tent. I am very pleased to see that Ms. Weingarten is evolving on these matters. I hope that she will come to understand that the CC$$ is the engine of a usurpation of the autonomy and authority of the people whom she represents. Ms. Weingarten has training in law. I wonder what she thinks of the Brookings Institution’s call for the CCSSO and NGA to “start enforcing their copyright,” which would make them, de facto, a curriculum censorship organization engaged in prior restraint in the market for educational materials. Prohibitions of restraint of trade run very deep in the common law.
LikeLike
Diane,
You know by now how I feel about Randi.
I don’t like her.
I hate what she has done to teachers and I am frustrated by all her intricate masks and domination of power, not to mention her refusal to change the democratic structure and by-laws of the UFT and AFT. Those rules have given her a virtual monopoly on power.
I know I speak for probably tens of thousands of teachers under the AFT.
There’s no nom de plum here. I am who I am. We’ve met. You are who you are. By now, you know how I feel about you, for what it’s worth.
But I will say that your strategy of harmony more than opposition in order to look at a greater cause has great merit, as uncomfortable I am and as much as I don’t like the flavor it comes in.
It leaves a bad taste in my mouth; the medicine is bitter. In fact, I am choking on it.
But I know you may be right on this, and some of the bitterest medicine is some of the most beneficial. History has taught us that divisions in allies weakens the movement against evil.
But sometimes competition within an ally organization produces a better overall ally.
I will accept Randi’s power and influence in furthering our cause, but I feel very vulnerable and stressed doing so. I have to be honest.
Given the way power has already been built up, it may be better to use whatever concentrations of power we can get to shift the current paradigms than to try and reinvent so readily ourselves, the latter of which can produce more casualties faster.
I know democracy is a process. It has growing pains and risks.
These are sinister times. A friend of my wife’s just got laid off. And our friend left teaching after 25 years because the working conditions in her public school were inhumane: bad federal policy pushing bad state policy pushing bad city policy. . . . .
I am not immune to restructuring in my own truly wonderful and beloved school community, but we must all keep up this fight whether or not we end up working as teachers or not. . . . .
And I for one feel compelled to use every weapon to keep public education alive and vibrant for every child. It is not a shiny comodity with fancy wrapping to pick from down a store aisle, but that is what so many opportunists and liars are trying to turn it into.
Maybe Weingarten is the three headed Cerebrus whose leash we teachers can hold tight to . . . ready to sick her on the plutocrats when the timing is right.
This is a great risk, Diane. At any given momen, the gruesome canine might turn once again against us.
But I think it has the potential to be a calculated risk worth taking . . . . .
LikeLike
Thank you, Robert. I hope my instincts are right. I think Randi has made some big mistakes. I think she is moving in our direction. I believe she will be our greatest ally if she continues to renounce VAM, cut off Gates funding, and be the great spokesperson that she can be. I will to believe it. And I believe it will be so.
LikeLike
Diane, instead of representing teachers and trying to protect them against the attacks embedded in CCSS and its accompanying evaluation processes, Weingarten is trying to protect the so-called reformers from themselves.
Rather than listen to her demoralized and attacked-on-all-fronts (no thanks to her) members, who are imploring her to do her job, she’s telling some of the the people who are overseeing the attacks that their style, rather than their agenda, needs to change if they want success.
In what way are we helped by her advice to our enemies on how to better administer poison to us?
It’s not about maintaining ideological purity, it’s about integrity and defending the interests of the people who pay her (quite generous) salary.
Weingarten’s words are empty, her integrity null. Her interests reside in the stifling bubble of her own opportunism and nowhere else. She will say anything to misdirect the attention of her members away from her responsibility for the dreadful situation we find ourselves in. That has always been the case, and remains so.
Your personal loyalty, while admirable, is highly misguided in this case, and I urge you to listen to the voices of the teachers on this site who pay the price every day for Weingarten’s catastrophic misleadership.
LikeLike
See my Dear Diane comment at the bottom.
LikeLike
When you have someone in your tent trying to burn it down, it is best to stop them giving them matches.
LikeLike
Surrounding yourself with apple polishers may be comforting, but it’s the truth that will you set you free. Remember??
LikeLike
… and then remove them from the tent, forthwith.
LikeLike
I’m a member of those unions: I do not want Common Core. I gave it time, I had an open mind. But I keep seeing more and more developmentally inappropriate material being taught to students and to my own kids. Why the crazy math? Why don’t King and Gates have their schools institute this math? Why do my kids have to learn this way? Why the close reading? Why the limited curriculum? It’s not good. It’s standardized to make it easy to microsoftize kids in schools that resemble Walmart.
LikeLike
How does this possibly help low-income children?? I think it will create bigger problems. It is just crazy. I get fed up with this being promoted as some cure for education in low-income areas. Gates claims that the schools aren’t educating the children in these areas very well. (I don’t agree this is the problem). How does the CC fix this in his mind????????????
LikeLike
Its snake oil salesmanship. Nothing more, nothing less.
Equating the CC as some sort of civil rights battle is playing the race card in the most vile way. The chips they are pushing into the pot as they go “all in” are the children; the poor, the disadvantaged, the neglected, and the learning disabled. To portray or imply that opponents of the CC are somehow bigoted is morally dispicable.
LikeLike
I do not want to “squabble” with Weingarten and Van Roekel, I want to replace them with leadership that more accurately represents the views of teachers. Do you think that they deserve to hold their positions for life?
LikeLike
Here I see good thinking xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Of course you get the major ‘why’– to be able to reduce the curriculum, assessments & score analysis to binary bits which can be systematized & sold by Microsoft & Apple.
But I’ve been thinking on the micro-details. For example, as you say, ‘why the crazy math’? Here I think I see good thinking made subservient to the binary assessment. Decades ago, US math ed was compared unfavorably to Asian methods: we tended to teach formulas ‘rote’, then apply to various sets of data. In Japan & China (acc. to analyses I read in the ’80’s), they would give groups of kids the data & the Q, then let the kids derive the formulas that would produce an accurate A., then compare the formulas, learning in the process that there were a number of ways to derive an accurate A.
By the time my youngest reached primary math [in the mid-’90’s], he was learning ways to notate multiplication & long division that were not simply rote, but illustrated number theory in a way that made concept-sense to his non-math brain. The pedagogical idea was, one should understand ‘why’. One could see if he got ‘why’ by looking at his notation.
But within 10 yrs (w/the advent of NCLB testing), this admirable approach had warped into something different: now you had to ‘explain’ why in cogent sentences. You could possess the ‘math sense’, but if you couldn’t explain it in articulate English, you were ‘wrong’. (By the same token, if you could explain a wrong answer articulately, you were ‘right’.)
I think what we’re seeing in primary CCSS math is an attempt to embed an understanding of the concept in a form which can be multiple-choice-tested.
Where we need to go is not toward computer-scored assessments, but in the opposite direction, long esteemed on European baccalaureates & A-levels: test less, & when you test, do it via essay, ‘show-your-work’ math, & orals.
LikeLike
You are right about our getting hung up on being able to express complex math concepts verbally. It really has to do with child development. It really is important that we know what we can expect to see at each age level. Explaining a process looks very different at 2nd grade vs 6th. We really have to have this conversation no matter what the subject. Learning looks different at different ages. I’m not sure how we talk about abstract concepts at a young age when their thinking is very concrete.
LikeLike
Why not ask Kati Haycock and/or Michael Cohen to debate you?
LikeLike
I, and I think many others, would not be too upset if Mitchell Chester moved on to another career. MA schools are moving in the same, wrong direction. He does not seem to care and won’t listen. We watch our neighbors in NY going through what we think we are likely to go through here soon.
LikeLike
Common Core has brought together the ‘strangest’ of bedfellows.
It is a rare occurrence when poor Blacks and upper income Whites are in agreement. Or, that teacher’s unions and school choice supporters are in the same side.
So it is when the discussion of Common Core comes up. These diverse factions understand this national education standard is bad for public education.
Both sides battle the corporate-govenment drive to fully implement Common Core independently, rather than unifying
to increase its strength.
Common Core cannot be defeated if varied groups nip at it, We must attack it from every side, so politicians within the states see this is a non-partisan issues and both incumbent Democrats and Republicans risk being defeated for not stopping further implementation.
I strongly suggest Diane and Randi reach out to grass roots, and yes Tea Party groups, and discuss how to best defeat Common Core.
Once we send Bill Gates and Arnie Duncan packing, they we can engage in the merits and detriments of charters, private and vouchers. ajbruno14 gmail
LikeLike
…or at least we should be more circumspect in our criticism of people and policies with which we don’t agree. Our power comes from numbers; we do not all agree on the whys and wherefores. How do we work together without shooting ourselves in the foot? The membership of the unions seems to be pushing the leadership away from their past lovefest with CCSS. It may be time for new leadership, but we’re foolish if we don’t work with the leadership we have now. Correct if I’m wrong, but I don’t see it changing in the near future. Isn’t there some military warning about fighting a battle on too many fronts?
LikeLike
Some excellent points. No citizen should remain wedded to an organization, and no organization should ever forget the people it serves.
Perhaps Common Core will be a Blessing and let us understand institutions which fail the people they were created to benefit do not deserve blind support.
Our role is to change organization which fail us, whether they are political parties, or any number of groups whose missions are compliant with our own interests.
LikeLike
The takeaway from all of the latest “controversies” surrounding High Stakes Testing, Common Core etc. is simply that the “owners”, like Bill Gates e.g., have control of the reins and the politicians are doing their bidding. This is nothing new, you might even consider this an American tradition.
Another point here is that those who think supporting Democrats is a worthwhile political act, in order to defend against the depredations of the more bellicose Republicans, are deluding themselves. The Democrats are the more effective evil as we are seeing with the Obama administration. The likes of Reagan and Bush would only be able to be green with envy at the shrewd manipulations of Obama as his administration makes inroads into public education, for the express purposes of big business unlike anything we’ve seen before,
More importantly it’s essential to understand the system as an integrated whole with education policy, circa 2014, as a perfect illustration of how big business runs the show. Playing D’s and R’s is all Kabuki. None of these people have our interests in mind.
The current situation surrounding Common Core and Race to the Top must be seen in the context of the privatization of everything. Resources are dwindling (being stolen) for municipalities in all areas and those funds are being shifted to private interests. The politicians at all levels- Team Donkey and the Elephants- are merely overseeing and rubber stamping the policies that sanction this theft.
Public education, like all else, is being replaced with a market-based, non-unionized privately managed system. Common Core is merely the latest marketing concept (the hammer to crack open the nut of taking public monies and placing them into private hands) used to manage public opinion and sell the idea that schools need radical restructuring that can only be done by corporate ideology- and investment. It has the convenient (and purposeful) benefit for those who have initiated it of ignoring the unsightly fact that the very same interests and methodologies that are being proposed to “fix” our “broken” schools are the same ones that have been and are destroying our schools (and all else) at breakneck speed. And all of this is by design.
High Stakes Testing, NCLB, Race to the Top, Common Core etc. have never been about educational processes they are political processes driven by business interests.
LikeLike
I feel the same way about the Dems lately, at the federal level anyway.
LikeLike
What is the money the chiefs got from Gates used for?
Propaganda? What did they do with all that money?
LikeLike
Joanna, I think they had a great party.
LikeLike
LOL!
LikeLike
Our state supe is very defensive of Common Core—she even called me on the phone to convince me of its merits. And it leaves me wondering how anyone could be so convinced of something untried, that to me feels unAmerican (the CCSS one set of skills fits all).
So it’s about not biting the hand that fed the chiefs (at a party). Yuck.
I wish Gates had just wanted some buildings named after him. Or auditoriums.
LikeLike
Despite what Bill thinks about the digital age, we still could use more libraries. It would be rather amusing to see his name on libraries. As much as I like computers, I don’t think they should replace print media. We need a “backup” system.
LikeLike
A strong union leader is supposed to protect us from the wolves. Instead both heads invited them into our house and are now surprised to see them gnawing away at our furniture. Of course people like Gates paid them to open the front door and just like business leaders getting giant tax breaks and pols getting large contributions, the money ruled over integrity.
LikeLike
(Part 1)
Dear Diane,
I very much appreciate your passion and advocacy for public education. And I admire the leadership role you’ve undertaken in defending public schools and teachers from corporate-style “reform.”
But I think you re sadly mistaken in attacking me for using a pseudonym to challenge what some public education “leaders” have done to aid and abet the corporate “reformers.” The message is more important than the name of the messenger. In fact, in my case the name – ‘democracy’ – IS the message.
Anyone who’s read my comments on this blog knows that I believe strongly in public schooling and its historical mission in nurturing democratic citizenship. I’ve traced that historic mission back to Aristotle who understood that “the character of democracy creates democracy,” and therefore “”education should be one and the same for all…public, and not private.”
I believe in Horace Mann’s concept of public education as “the balance-wheel of the social machinery” in a democratic society. And I agree with University of Chicago social scientist Earl Johnson that “the supreme end of education in a democracy is the making of the democratic character.” I’m an ardent supporter of the development of critical intelligence –– what Gordon Hullfish and Philip Smith called “reflective reconstruction of knowledge, insights and values” –– as an absolutely essential element in the maintenance of a democratic society. And I subscribe to John Dewey’s philosophical foundation for public schooling:
“What the best and wisest parent wants for his own child, that must the community want for all its children. Any other ideal for our schools is narrow and unlovely; acted upon, it destroys our democracy.”
But I also believe, as Dewey wrote in Democracy and Education, that the “Lack of the free and equitable intercourse…makes intellectual stimulation unbalanced…An undesirable society is one which internally and externally sets up barriers to free intercourse and communication of experience.” It certainly seems to me that your demand that I toe the Network for Public Education (NPE) party line reeks more of “ideological purity” than any of my factually-based criticisms of teacher organization “leaders.”
LikeLike
The following excerpt is from a January 2014 article in the Washington Post (now a wholly Jeff Bezos owned digital property). It indicates that Ms. Weingarten’s leadership role is that of advocate for corporate-style education reform. My personal concern is the inappropriate privatization that is being aggressively pursued under the Obama administration (and during the Clinton era, both terms, but in other areas more than education… maybe).
The Department of Education didn’t develop Common Core, but rather, two “education company” consortia. They will plausibly have oligopoly market power over Common Core (per a prior post, concerning copyright of those standards) and thus, of public education. This has the full faith and backing of federal government, yet your professional organization leader said:
URL to follow.
LikeLike
Exactly, Ellie K. That’s the point I keep making.
You know, there were plenty of legislators who went along with the crowd in voting for the war in Iraq. A fair number of them were afraid of being perceived as “unpatriotic” if they didn’t vote for the war. Yet, there were a number of published articles that detailed Saddam had already disarmed.
The Congressional vote on the Tonkin Gulf Resolution was even more lop-sided, and it came after an “incident” that never happened. One of the two ‘No’ votes came from Senator Wayne Morse (D-Or).
Morse said that he had ” complete faith in the ability of the American people to follow the facts if you’ll give them.”
And that’s part of the problem now…the facts are too often obscured, distorted, misrepresented and lied about.
Here’s Morse on his anti-war vote in 1964:
LikeLike
As a NYC public school teacher who has observed Weingarten closely for over fifteen years, I can unequivocally state that the woman has been a fraud from the beginning.
She is one of Them, and should be treated as such.
LikeLike
Source: Leaders of teachers union, business group join to support Common Core standards (18 Dec 2013)
“The head of the country’s second-largest teachers union and a business leader who tried to weaken unions as a onetime governor of Michigan have made a joint plea to the nation’s governors to stand by the controversial Common Core academic standards.”
I apologize if this does not post consecutively with my prior comment. My intent was to echo democracy’s concerns in both comments.
LikeLike
(Part 2), Dear Diane
The record is more than clear. As head of the AFT, Randi Weingarten took the Common Core money from Bill Gates, signed on to the Common Core standards, and endorsed the Common Core accountability and evaluation measures. Weingarten even joined a and a Gates Foundation nabob to wrote that it was critical for American public education to “align teacher development and evaluation to the Common Core state standards.” The NEA (Dennis Van Roekel) essentially did the same. In essence, both the AFT and NEA bought into the corporate “reform” myth that public education was “in crisis” and needed rigorous standards and a healthy dose of “accountability to recover and to make the U.S. “economically competitive.” And this was AFTER the disaster of No Child Left Behind. So, what kind of “vision” is that?
It was only after a backlash that Weingarten and the NEA began to reconsider. What they signed on to is an awful lot to walk back. And yes, I’m pleased to see that Randi Weingarten is making, as you say, “incremental steps” to undo what she’s helped to set in motion. I too would welcome, from both AFT and NEA, “more changes.” Weingarten has now said she will no longer take Gates cash, and she has distanced herself from value-added evaluations. There’s another step, the big one. And that’s disowning the Common Core. You recently told Salon that the NEA needs to be “more outspoken.” And you praised Weingarten for being “quite outspoken.” So, will she and Van Roekel take that next step?
You told Salon that “Public schools today are under siege…The policy agenda should be one of equity.” I agree. Strongly. However, the explicit purpose of the Common Core is to prepare kids “to compete successfully in the global economy” (someone from the Common Core standards initiative has been listening, because that rationale has recently been scrubbed from the CCSI website). And that’s what the AFT and NEA agreed to. Now, that’s what’s really – to use your term – “dumb.”
And I don’t mind pointing it out.
The big-money foundations –– Gates, Walton, Robertson, Bradley and Koret Foundations –– push “market-driven” corporate-style “reforms.” They are supported by the likes of Pearson (the testing behemoth), ETS (think College Board and PSAT, SAT, AP, and AccuPlacer), ACT, Achieve (funded by big business), McGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin and Microsoft. And by big bankers (Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan) and hedge-funders. And by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable.
These groups have pushed incessantly for corporate and upper-bracket tax cuts and laissez-faire regulatory policies that caused a huge pile-up of deficits and debt and led to a shattered economy. The supply-side policies these organizations pushed led to increases in poverty, millions of lost jobs and houses, a corporate culture that fosters off-shore tax evasion and funds oligarchic ideology, and gross income inequality. They broke the economy. But the perpetrators point the finger of blame at public education. The Chamber says the Common Core standards “are essential to helping the United States remain competitive” in the global economy. The Business Roundtable says that increasing student achievement via the Common Core is vitally important to increasing U.S. competitiveness (the Roundtable has even resurrected the “rising tide of mediocrity” myth).
I am WITH you one hundred percent if you believe in public education’s vital mission, to develop citizens in a democratic re[public who are critically thoughtful and reflective, and who both understand and are committed to the core values of democracy: popular sovereignty, equality, justice, freedoms for all citizens, tolerance, and promoting the general welfare of the nation. I think you do.
But do the current “leaders” of the AFT and NEA believe in it? Actions tend to speak much more loudly than words.
LikeLike
You did not mention Randi’s decade long involvement with the Broad Foundation. See the section “Broad and the Unions” in “Who is Eli Broad and why does he want to destroy public education?”
http://www.defendpubliceducation.net/
LikeLike
Ken, you didn’t mention my two-decade long involvement in the conservative movement. Stop bashing Randi. She is the president of the AFT and we want her as an ally. You help Gates, Walton, and Broad with your attacks on her. You divide us when we need to unite.
LikeLike
Diane – you realised the error of your ways, said so publicly and ACTED on that realisation…. tried to undo the damage you had done…
I dont think we want or need an ally who acts AGAINST the interests of teachers and children… IF Randi wont do an immediate 180, then she needs to go…. for every day that she is allowed to continue her collaboration with the ed reformers (in the name of “having a seat at the table”), millions of children and teachers suffer – and they dont get any of those days back to have a different experience and different outcome…
And we dont have time for Randi to indulge herself in half-hearted ‘baby steps’ towards rehabilitation… For every day that she continues, the ed reformers pour more money and resources into the ed reform agenda, make more progress embedding it into the system and make it so much harder for us to ever stop it and root it out….
LikeLike
and Diane – we are not BASHING Randi…..we are calling her out on her BS, holding her feet to the fire of accountability and responsibility…. having put herself in a powerful position, she MUST expect to be scrutinised and (where necessary criticised) for her actions. She supposedly represents and acts on behalf of millions…. and yet there she was a couple of weeks ago – at NPE if my memory serves me – saying she supports Common Core because she PERSONALLY LIKES it (or the idea of it)….
In her position, she has no right to do anything because she PERSONALLY likes something, thinks it’s a good idea… She is supposed to be the mouthpiece and action arm of and for the millions she represents…. not of the ed reformers and not of her own personal agenda…
I too will continue to hold the mirror up to Randi and call her out on her collaboration/collusion and demand that she either denounce ALL of ed reform and GIVE BACK THE MONEY taken from the reformers, or step down from her position as head of AFT….
and I would be doing the same for Dennis, if I could get access to him – but he hides…..
LikeLike
Sahila, you are a great ally for Gates, Broad, Rhee, Moskowitz, Klein. They would like nothing better than to divide us.
LikeLike
Diane, a person’s actions tell the truth about their true beliefs. Words can be used to obscure the truth. I have no personal animus towards Randi Weingarten.
When researching the Broad Foundation I kept finding her name. I just laid out a factual historical account of those relations. (I provide links for all of my assertions.) If she is offended by the truth being exposed perhaps she should explain her actions. Why would she be offended at the truth?
She may have misunderstood who she was dealing with, but she took millions from them and even, according to you, is still trying to fix the Common Core which is a Bill Gates boondoggle.
Haven’t we learned it is never in the interest of the common good to obscure the truth? The only people this is being kept from are rank and file teachers. The corporate education reformers already know of her involvement with Broad, her support for Common Core, and the money she has taken from Gates.
LikeLike
Clarification: I meant the money the AFT has taken from Gates. I am not saying that Randi Weingarten has personally taken money from Gates.
LikeLike
and to be clear, I too have no animosity towards Randi personally; her personal beliefs are her own and I honour/respect that… my beef with her is the position she’s taken on ed reform, despite all the evidence, despite the wishes of union members and despite the views of the parents of the children her stance affects, every single day…
LikeLike
Diane – IF you (or someone else) have the power to muzzle Randi, to stop her public pronouncements in favour of ed reform, THEN maybe it would be good to keep her as the figurehead boss of the AFT…. BUT YOU DONT…. and there’s no sense in keeping a leader who does damage to the organisation and to public education…
I dont get why you cant see that to keep in place an individual who does ACTIVE AND LONG TERM harm, is not a good idea… and that getting rid of that person from that position HELPS US, rather than the ed reformers…. would you advocate that someone not lance a boil on their body because it might be messy, that they should instead put up with the poison circulating through the body and the pain?
I go after Bill et al on a daily basis…. maybe I dont/wont make much impact, but I intend to be as annoying as a mosquito…. maybe I cant make them stop, but I intend to ‘witness’ – “I see what you are doing, I see through your BS and I’m standing here, saying its not OK – not in my name, and not with my child”…….
LikeLike
To follow up on philaken’s comment about Randi and The Broad Foundation: the infamous 2009 Broad Foundation report that describes how to kill a public school also brags how the Foundation worked ” … to invest in smart, progressive labor leaders like Randi Weingarten.”
To my knowledge, Randi has never made any effort to disabuse anyone of the notion that she is one of Eli Broad’s “investments.” In fact, her actions before and since that statement confirm it.
Also, Diane, comparing your changes in outlook over the years with Randi’s purported ones is not a fair analogy: aside from your time in government service, you spoke as a private individual, not as the paid leader of a trade union responsible for defending the interests of its members.
Randi has a legal and moral obligation to defend and protect teachers, something she has continually failed to do. The disasters teachers and the public schools face could not have proceeded as they have unless the leadership of the unions had been collaborating with those who profit by them.
This post demonstrates that continuing failure, since instead of trying to bury Common Core, she is giving advice on how to have it succeed.
The “success” of Common Core is the beginning of the end of the teacher’s unions and public education, since it and the tests it is a vehicle for are intended to fatally undermine both.
By bringing up these matters publicly, we give no comfort to Gates and Broad, since they are the ones using this woman’s opportunism against us. By exposing her, we are taking the first steps toward having a union that actually represents and fights for its members, rather than a vehicle for a poser and chameleon who sells out her members, not for pieces of silver, but for some fictional (children’s) “seat at the table.”
To paraphrase the great NYC journalist, Murray Kempton: what a lesser person would have sold for money, Randi gave away for free.
LikeLike
Michael, I try never to get involved in union politics. I am not a member of any union, and unions must elect their own officers. That said, I think that Randi has made some important steps forward. First, her insistence that the standards be decoupled from the tests is a game-changer. If that happens, the standards will be revised by teachers, hopefully improved, but will have no power to do harm. You have your opinion, I have mine. I am doing my best to expose the Common Core; Randi has no control over what I say or do. But I think for our movement to succeed, we cannot waste our energy fighting our leaders. NEA is usually silent, except when Dennis is partnering with Wendy Kopp or Teach Plus. Randi heard us at NPE; that’s why she told the Chiefs that they had lost the trust of teachers. We can’t spend our time shooting our leaders or we are lost.
LikeLike
She is going to have to work really hard FOR teachers to at least gain the support of teachers who have been too busy surviving to get involved. I am no longer in a union, and I can’t say they did much for me when I was, so I really have no clue what percentage of the AFT would be willing to support her. I feel pretty battered after my experience; unions have done nothing but give back in recent years. It is time to take a stand FOR teachers, so we can continue to stand for our students.
LikeLike
Diane,
You know, or I hope you know, that I have a great deal of respect for you.
I also have no personal animosity whatsoever toward Randi. I respect her intelligence and work ethic, and she has always been respectful in our personal/professional encounters. Unlike her successor at the UFT, she makes efforts to engage directly with members, even when they are critical of her.
Regarding the leadership and direction of the union, and the struggle against the so-called reformers, we’re just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.
LikeLike
Sorry, but we are NOT solid behind the CCSS. It’s NOT just about the implementation. Randi has done us a huge disservice in rubber stamping this because SHE thought it was right. The “reformers” use her endorsement as a major selling point every time the subject is brought up.
LikeLike
I will stop bashing Randi when she starts acting like the president of the teacher’s union.
LikeLike
The question Is: does Randi support the positions of the union members who elected her? That is what she was entrusted to do.
LikeLike
Well, that is a big part of it. But leaders are elected to lead, too, which entails having the smarts and the moxie to chart new territory without ever sacrificing the principles upon which the organization is based and that moral action demands.
Not only does Weingarten fail to support the best interests of teachers and students, but she does so in ways that make a mockery of the principles of unionism and ethical imperatives.
For her fealty to Michael Bloomberg and his corporate intoxicants , she has been placed in a position for which she is unsuited, by either character or intelligence. All she ever had going for her was an abundance of cunning and guile, which she has used effectively to this point to keep everyone outside her patron’s close circle guessing as to her real corporate habits.
No one believes you anymore, Randi, except Diane and her small band of pathetic apple polishers. Will you reward her loyalty by bringing her down with you? Will she be fool enough to allow you to do so?
LikeLike
She has the Democratic State legislators in NY so tied up that the Republicans are eating her lunch on this. The Dems just rubbers stamped the incumbent Regents that were reelected to the positions after overseeing the CC debacle. They even elected a “faith healer dietician” who has no knowledge of the issue. The Republicans had an excellent bill that would have stopped this nonsense. The Union has destroyed the party, then she goes off to the Ukraine to discuss educational issues there for her buddies Bill and Hillary, when her home front is on fire. We need the education leaders in Ukraine to come and advise us on Common Core.
LikeLike
Randi’s going to Ukraine – where the State Department and CIA spent $5 billion dollars fomenting a coup in hopes of encircling Russia and denying it access to the Black Sea – aside from being an insult to the teachers she won’t go to the barricades for here at home, is a clear repeat of AFT/AFL-CIO involvement with US intelligence agencies in the past, such as Albert Shanker’s support for the fascist coup against Chile’s elected Allende government in 1973.
As a result of Pinochet’s coup – where neoliberalism was given it’s trial run – education in Chile was privatized, something Chilean students are only now widely mobilizing against.
In addition, the business press has reported that IMF bailouts of Ukraine seek as a precondition the introduction of “education reform” to the country. I guess it’s not enough that Randi betray teachers here; she apparently feels the need to turn over the schools to the neo-liberals everywhere. (www.nytimes.com/2014/03/14/business/international/in-ukraine-a-wish-to-be-more-like-poland.html)
Gee, Randi, was it fun serving doughnuts to the neo Nazi’s and anti-Semites on the Maidan?
LikeLike