The next time that a supporter of the Common Core standards says there are no critics on the left, tell them to read this post by Paul Horton.
Arne Duncan says that the opposition to the Common Core standards emanate from the Tea Party and other rightwing extremists. The media have bought that line, and in some states it is surely true.
But recently the media have noticed that the Common Core has outspoken critics on the left, even though they can’t understand why anyone on the left would oppose standards that allegedly produce equity, excellence, critical thinking, and everything good.
Paul Horton is one of the nation’s most articulate and eloquent opponents of the Common Core standards. Paul Horton teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School. He is not a member of the Tea Party; he does not wear a tin foil hat. He is a serious and well-informed teacher.
In this post (which is behind an Education Week paywall), he argues that the purpose of the Common Core standards is to generate profits for business and deskill teachers. He argues that the Common Core standards are essential to the long-term strategy of leaders in business-industry-and-government to eliminate unions, to replace experienced teachers with Teach for America, and to hand public schools over to private management. The driving force, he maintains, is corporate greed.
He insists that the best thing to do with the CCSS is to eliminate it.
He writes:
It has become increasingly clear to me that the Common Core is not about the Common Core and that CBS is not a news network, but a new mindset created by corporate honchos who want to exploit Computer Business Systems to de-skill white- collar professions to break unions and lower wages.
To the extent that teaching and the medical professions, for example, can be scripted and digitalized in measurable units, efficiency targets can demand less human interaction and “time theft.”
This is the brave new world that Simon Head describes in his recently published, Mindless: Why Smarter Machines are Making Dumber Humans. Can you guess? You got it, profit! We have been focusing on Common Core like lonely young men focus on Mona Lisa’s smile. Common Core is like the tip of the iceberg on the surface: it has become the reified image of a global crisis that most of us can not quite get our minds around.
He adds:
But while the corporate-funded technocrats of the Democratic party are pushing their education policies down the throats of as many Americans as they can, inspiring more mobilization from the right, what is left of the union-supported Populist wing of the party is steaming mad. The Tea Party has been successful in its Grover Norquist inspired strangulation of government at all levels, and the Democratic Party is cooperating with corporate-led attempts to break public unions. The Obama administration has gone after teacher unions with a vengeance.
According to Head, most Americans can’t see the big picture because “CBSs (Computer Business Systems) are the semi-discovered black holes of the contemporary economy.” (3) He argues that Information technology is creating income inequality by driving down wages in the white-collar professions that could not be previously “Taylorized.” “By making us dumber, smart machines also diminish our earning power.” (3) In other words my doctor and I face the same set of issues: as machines and algorithms take over, our work can be divided into units and our efficiency can be statistically measured. We are in the same boat as weavers who worked the “putting out” system in the late eighteenth century—they were paid for each piece produced. In other words, corporate bosses are trying to push teachers, doctors, and all white collar-service workers into a work structure that is increasingly deskilled to justify lowering salaries and benefits, busting unions and professional organizations, increase productivity, and forcing all white collar workers to compete through the use of digitalized efficiency reports and student and student test data banks. This data will be shared with consulting firms like McKinsey to evaluate potential and current employees world wide. Troublemakers, union organizers, and those with low productivity and test scores will be funneled into the lowest-paying service jobs.
And he concludes:
The reason Mr. Gates and Mr. Duncan become very upset when states want to drop the Common Core, PARCC, data collection, or standardized testing is that all of these components are required by CBS. Pearson Education, a British company that gave ninety-four percent of its campaign contributions to the Obama campaign, is working with Microsoft and InBloom to scale up data collection. All of these companies are scaling up the de-skilling of the education workplace and they are breaking what is considered learning down to discrete, easily measured units. The global teaching profession at the school and university levels is being set up for work speed-ups with productivity gains going to management and investors. Assessment data for all teachers will be stored to determine salaries based on effectiveness as measure by student test scores. Students will also have their data collected and evaluated at each stage of their academic and professional careers. Based on McKinsey’s model of employment disruption, CBS and data analysis will be used to force white-collar employees to compete with employees around the world. Layoffs will be frequent to motivate greater productivity….
The Common Core deskills the teaching profession by turning the teaching into a delivery machine. Relationships with students are to be ignored and replaced by the mechanical delivery of scripted lessons in a particular sequence. In effect, the teacher craftsman will be forced to work on an assembly line. Evaluations will be based on a standard Charlotte Danielson rubric that has its origins in Kaplan’s “Balanced Scorecard” and “Value Added Measures” based on student test scores….
Understanding Common Core is about seeing a much larger picture. That picture is a collage of the strategic plans of most multinational corporations that are increasingly managed or heavily influenced by the CBS approach to business and labor relations. What the Tea Party erroneously views as the socialistic overreach of the Obama Administration is in reality the administration’s acquiescence to the power of multi-nationals that are pushing the CBS imperative to de-skill and destroy what is left of the American and global skilled white-collar middle-class.
The corporate-owned major editorial boards and television media refuse to report the big picture. They will focus on Glenn Beck’s ignorant bloviating about the Common Core to throw “reasonable people” who read the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal off the real story: corporate greed….
We need to discard every element of the Race to the Top including the Common Core because RTTT is a very different animal than state curriculum standards. The global economy has changed since the mid 80s when states were coordinating education policy reforms. RTTT is the handmaiden of multinational corporations that want to bust unions to capture productivity gains. This might be ok if they planned on sharing some of those gains with a hard-working workforce as Adam Smith believed should happen. The global reality of growing income inequality should serve as a wake-up call to our education unions.

You mean to say you don’t need a tin foil hat to oppose CCSS, only a master’s degree in education?
Does either side fully understand what curriculum is? Is it at all like a story? Do two people ever tell the same story the same way? Do two people who share an experience tell the story the same way? How can you solve a problem that no one understands? How can we arrive at shared understanding?
I think the answer is to do the hard work of democracy. Shared understanding always precedes consensus. Map out the questions, the answers proposed, arguments for and against each, and decisions that can be made, places where understanding already exists. Do we agree learning should be student centered? Then ask students what they want. Do we agree that collaboration is a 21st-century competency? Then collaborate.
LikeLike
“Do we agree that collaboration is a 21st-century competency? ”
Unfortunately too many educators do. And much like the Vichy collaborators they too will eventually see justice done and it won’t be kind to the collaborators.
LikeLike
I think the phrase is “Stockholm Syndrome”.
LikeLike
“Do we agree that collaboration is a 21st-century competency? ”
I agree that is the silliest notion ever. (No offense directed at the one who posed the question–we are surrounded by this type of pondering and language).
Here we are in the 21st Century. 15 years in. 85 to go. We think we’ve got it figured out.
“collaboration” never existed before the 21st Century?
Maybe the idea is:
The more complex societies get and the more complex the networks of interdependence within and beyond community and national borders get, the more people are forced in their own interests to find non–zero-sum solutions. That is, win-win solutions instead of win-lose solutions…. Because we find as our interdependence increases that, on the whole, we do better when other people do better as well — so we have to find ways that we can all win, we have to accommodate each other….
—Bill Clinton, Wired interview, December 2000.
But, so why can’t we just speak frankly about stuff? Corporate speak statements belong in corporate environments. Not in environments that are about people. I feel like while public school folks are having discussions about what century we live in and what skills are to be attributed to it, using corporate lingo in a non-corporate setting, our schools are being taken one by one.
There is language we should just not use. It’s holding us back, not taking us forward.
LikeLike
Here is an explanation from an educator about the issues from a schools superintendent that sums up the issues.
http://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/2014/02/26/get-it-right-on-common-core/5846153/
LikeLike
Classroom management is becoming more difficult in the schools with the new Common Core materials.
One professional indicated that the kids are becoming twice as “noisy”.
They are trying to defend themselves.
LikeLike
In our last round of testing (seems like we’ve been doing non-stop testing since Christmas), one of the students in a co-worker’s class got in trouble for handing back an answer sheet that contained only the following two words:
“NO MAS!”
LikeLike
Well, the student should have gotten into trouble for not citing the author/utterer of that quote-Roberto Duran.
LikeLike
I apologize for the poorly constructed sentence. Here are the issues with Common Core from the perspective of the Superintendent of South Orangetown (NY) schools who is also President of the Lower Hudson Council of School Superintendents.
http://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/2014/02/26/get-it-right-on-common-core/5846153/
LikeLike
I feel like most of the conversations and decisions that have been made in recent years for education policy are about money and not about education. There are elements to education behind each point, but ultimately I don’t feel like the real subtext is education at all; furthermore, even if the underlying subtext prior to reform trends was also not about money, I want to understand more if the qualities they were about were more redeeming to our society than what we have now. (It seems they would have been—integration, working together as a society for a common place for children to learn, a strong middle class, job opportunities for even those who are not from the Ivy League chain, opportunities for women). Certainly those things had cost, everything does. But evaluating the cost to benefit ratio of where we were and where we are now is important and important to continue conveying to the main stream.
LikeLike
That was kind of garbled mess.
In short, I guess I don’t understand why a corporation would want to devour the country that hosts it. That seems short-sighted to me and not business savvy at all. You’ve got to love your country. Maybe that’s why the “global” stuff is so handy a mentality. It allows for putting corporation ahead of God and country.
LikeLike
Joanna, 49 of the 50 largest economic entities in the world today are corporations, not governments but corporations.
LikeLike
Bob. . .can’t help but quote Eddie Izzard:
“Do they have a flag??”
(hee hee)
LikeLike
LikeLike
LOL
LikeLike
Spot on, Joanna.
I am not a conspiracy theorist but the game plan has evolved as such:
Design a system destined to fail (NCLB)
Then proclaim failure
Then say we must fix the failure (that we designed)
Suggested fixes: charter schools, vouchers, etc.
Use “evidence” of the failure to destroy existing system
Repeat that the old system failed (always)
State that the new system is working (always)
When evidence suggests the new system isn’t working
Then say it works just as well and is cost-effective
Then say we have a new system (CCSS)
One that was developed quietly and became a fait accompli
Make sure the profiteers funded the policymakers
Make sure the newspapers provide support
Give the financiers (Gates) endless op-ed columns
The only thing that really changes in this system is who gets the money. It has been the increasingly middle class teacher. Now, it’s time to de-professionalize so the same amount of money can shift to others.
For those who don’t believe me, check out how much charter CEOs make versus their teachers and then do the same for traditional public districts. The income inequality gap is much bigger in the former.
Also, it’s time to stop saying that CCSS isn’t a curriculum. EngageNY material is a heavily scripted curriculum. CCSS as standards is just a step to “scaling up” those “good” lesson plans. CCSS isn’t curriculum. Yet.
LikeLike
CC$$ math is a curriculum outline. CC$$ ELA PRECLUDES a lot of possible curricula, pedagogical approaches, and learning progressions.
LikeLike
All you have to do is have paid attention to American politics over the past 35 years to know this is the game plan. This isn’t “conspiracy” thinking–in fact it has been out in the open for DECADES. Lois Weiner has been writing about this subject for years, and I suspect Paul Horton has read her work. Weiner knows more about neoliberalism and education than perhaps anybody alive, and she is dead right about what the “reforms” are all about. It’s all about a global race to the bottom by restricting education access and upward mobility through education and through unionization.
I knew about all this before I had ever heard of Lois Weiner; I merely observed the absolute reverence politicians had for an “unfettered free market” back during the Reagan years, and it is an extremist ideology that is unworkable and has caused and will cause much in the way of human misery. The GOP fell in love with neoliberalism, and it eventually found its way through the Democratic Party to the point it is ruined. The DLC had those tendencies, with the organization now called The Third Way, but the influence of Wall Street types like Robert Rubin were even more important. Bill Clinton sold out those who were on welfare, then sold out on trade agreements, and eventually capitulated to Congress on the repeal of Glass-Steagall.
The way the neolibs got their stranglehold on American politics was pushing for tax cuts for the rich during the Reagan administration. This started the move toward the huge wage and income inequality we are going through now. Then they had a nonstop propaganda campaign which was facilitated by getting rid of the Fairness Doctrine. Reagan busting PATCO gave businesses all kinds of excuses to destroy unions. And so on down the line.
The neolibs/libertarians have all the time in the world to force their version of Social Darwinism on the masses. They figure future generations can be more easily lied to about the New Deal and other regulations that helped make post-war American prosperity possible because they are further and further away from experiencing that prosperity to have ANY frame of reference. They are being told to scale down their expectations, even their lifestyles (hence this nonsense about “tiny houses”–the shanty towns of the future). They are told unions are the enemy, that teachers are the enemy, that public employees are the enemy, that public education is terrible, that pensions are destroying states, that Social Security is in a crisis, and all of the other lies they have been peddling over the past 30 years.
Next time a politician–and that includes especially Bill Clinton–starts yapping about “globalism” or the “global economy,” shout them down and run them out of town. THEY are the problem because they have been enamored with crackpot Milton Friedman’s ideas for years.
LikeLike
“I knew about all this before I had ever heard of Lois Weiner”
Well look at you!
LikeLike
Susannunes:
I didn’t pay attention because I was busy growing up.
This is all a real shock for some of us who are about 40 years old and never saw it coming. We trusted that there was enthusiasm for a public school system for the common good (systems, within states), or at least I did. Silly me.
Going back and reading, I’d say the trouble started when Carter finally got us the Department of Education, a central command station that is aiding in the destruction.
LikeLike
Susannunes,
this Moyers & company episode fits right with your post: http://billmoyers.com/segment/the-surrender-of-americas-liberals/
LikeLike
Duncan’s speech on privacy is pretty much the standard free market line on regulation:
“But the responsibility here doesn’t lay just with schools systems. Technology providers need to shoulder their responsibility for ensuring the privacy of our students as well.
There’s plenty of energy, in this room and around the country, for stronger regulation of your work. Let me say this clearly: It is in your interest to police yourselves before others do.”
I don’t know why we keep trying this. It never works. It didn’t work with the finance sector and it won’t work with the tech sector. They’re about making money. That’s what they do. The idea that “markets” will work to restrain this is the same boilerplate nonsense we’ve heard for the last 30 years.
Asking them nicely to comply with voluntary norms and letting them write the regulations is a horrible idea. We have a huge problem with regulatory capture in this country and the response to that is to hold “summits” where Joel Klein advises on how to regulate the same product he’s selling?
Not to mention that the administration just took 750 million from the tech industry immediately prior to this lovefest between the regulators and the regulated.
I am really, really sick of this. I don’t want to pay these people NOT to work for me. They can go work for Klein.
LikeLike
“I don’t know why we keep trying this. It never works. It didn’t work with the finance sector and it won’t work with the tech sector. They’re about making money. That’s what they do. The idea that “markets” will work to restrain this is the same boilerplate nonsense we’ve heard for the last 30 years.”
Well said. I would argue that specious arguments will always be made to rally the hens around the fox. The laws that allow special moneyed interests to control elected officials & pervert the public welfare to their own ends is already in place. Citizens’ United & campaign reform are probably the place to start damage-control.
LikeLike
This LONG predates Citizens United. Try going back from the time University of Chicago school crackpot Milton Friedman got his Nobel prize and the 1973 Chilean coup and installment of dictator Augusto Pinochet.
Interesting Horton has worked for the U of Chicago. That gives a good perspective on things.
LikeLike
Good comment, Chiara. Like any policy that impacts more than one person, we need to account for human’s propensity for “sin.” That is, it is human nature to sin, and one of the “deadly sins” is greed. It should be accounted for when determining public policy. Always. The cries for “deregulation” and that the “free market” will solve everything is one of the most asinine beliefs in our existence. We should never under-estimate human nature. The financial collapse of 2008 should serve as a constant reminder of the liability of not accounting for human nature.
LikeLike
The opposition from teachers, administrators and educators will have minimal impact on the current efforts of the corporate reformers. It will be only and IF the parents realize that the greed for profit has been at their children’s “expense” and is in fact abusive that the current changes will be challenged and perhaps addressed.
LikeLike
Only if their votes count. In states and districts where ed is run by the state, things happen by fiat.
LikeLike
I mean, this JUST happened:
“Apple on Wednesday settled a complaint by the Federal Trade Commission alleging the technology giant didn’t do enough to prevent children from making purchases on mobile apps without their parents’ consent.
Apple has settled with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations that the company didn’t do enough to prevent children from making unauthorized purchases on mobile apps.
As part of the settlement, Apple agreed to refund a minimum of $32.5 million for all unauthorized charges and modify its billing practices for mobile apps to ensure it obtains express consent from consumers before charging them.”
This was a case involving children, and the regulator did absolutely nothing. There’s no incentive not to do it again. This is a minor annoyance to that company. “Market forces” apparently failed, and then the regulator slapped them on the wrist.
The First Lady is, right now, traveling the country telling us that food industry giants are selling junk food to kids in public schools. Every one of the executives at those companies would tell you they love children. That didn’t stop them from filling their schools with crap that was harming them.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304419104579322630856864274
LikeLike
Some will dismiss Paul Horton’s views as overly dramatic or inaccurate but, IMHO, it is a sober and realistic picture of what is actually happening.
For example, is the CC just, or mainly, about its purported educational goals?
A well-informed insider of the charterite/privatizer movement, Dr. Frederick Hess of the American Enterprise, gives us a peek behind the curtain:
[start quote]
In truth, the idea that the Common Core might be a “game-changer” has little to do with the Common Core standards themselves, and everything to do with stuff attached to them, especially the adoption of common tests that make it possible to readily compare schools, programs, districts, and states (of course, the announcement that one state after another is opting out of the two testing consortia is hollowing out this promise).
But the Common Core will only make a dramatic difference if those test results are used to evaluate schools or hire, pay, or fire teachers; or if the effort serves to alter teacher preparation, revamp instructional materials, or compel teachers to change what students read and do. And, of course, advocates have made clear that this is exactly what they have in mind. When they refer to the “Common Core,” they don’t just mean the words on paper–what they really have in mind is this whole complex of changes.
[end quote]
Link: http://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/the-american-enterprise-institute-common-core-and-good-cop/
But surely, even if the above is true in measure small or large, the aspirational educational goals of CC are unalloyed gold, right?
To the derision of some, the owner of this blog has quoted John Dewey’s famous phrase:
“What the best and wisest parent wants for his child, that must we want for all the children of the community. Anything less is unlovely, and left unchecked, destroys our democracy.”
Link: https://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/22/what-the-best-and-wisest-parent-wants-for-his-child-2/
So leaving aside what the leading charterites/privatizers are increasingly mandating for OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN, take a look at a few (if outstanding) examples of what they have ensured or are currently ensuring for THEIR OWN CHILDREN:
Link: http://www.lakesideschool.org [Bill Gates]
Link: http://www.harpethhall.org [Michelle Rhee]
Link: http://www.delbarton.org [Chris Christie]
Link: http://www.ucls.uchicago.edu [Rahm Emanuel]
Link: http://www.sidwell.edu [Barack Obama]
Link: http://www.spenceschool.org [Michael Bloomberg]
I also refer interested viewers to the following blog postings:
Link: http://teacherslessonslearned.blogspot.com/2014/02/size-matters_18.html [on class size]
Link: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2014/01/yes-reformers-we-should-talk-about-your.html [on rheephorm double standards re schools for theirs and schools for the rest of us]
Common Core? What Common Core? Ah yes, to paraphrase/update Leona Helmsley’s [in]famous statement, “Common Core is just for the commoners.”
The hypocrisy is stunning.
Many thanks to the owner of this blog and Paul Horton for following one of the best American traditions:
“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.” [Frederick Douglass]
😎
LikeLike
There is nothing overly dramatic about Paul Horton’s comments. They are REPORTING. This is what is happening. Few understand this. Many well-meaning educrats do not and are being PLAYED.
LikeLike
“Arne Duncan says that the opposition to the Common Core standards emanate from the Tea Party and other rightwing extremists”
Some more porcine excrements emanating from perhaps the most unqualified person to ever hold the DOE head position.
Hey Dunkster, chew on this (if it’s not too tough for you): What if one is so RIGHT that they are LEFT out while at the same time being so far LEFT that they are RIGHT.
LikeLike
okay who stole my story plot! I’ve been telling this to my colleagues for months. They looked at me so strangely that I began telling them that it was the story for my new book that I was going to write. In the vernacular of my students “it sucks to be right”
LikeLike
well done! keep up those mad ramblings!
LikeLike
“CBS and data analysis will be used to force white-collar employees to compete with employees around the world.”
And in organizations where the employees are being very efficient, the data will be manipulated to show that they are NOT. At least when that is to the advantage of the owners.
LikeLike
Of course. Thank you, Paul.
The CC$$ was an essential part of a strategic plan. Many Educrats who support the CC$$ are essentially clueless about this. The CC$$ were necessary in order to carry out a plan for creating a monopoly on the computer-adaptive curricula of the future. That’s why Gates paid to have them created. Pearson chipped in because a single set of national standards creates ENORMOUS economies of scale that a big company can exploit but that smaller competitors cannot.
Has it ever occurred to people that objections to these standards MIGHT NOT BE POLITICAL AT ALL but, rather, might have to do with their extraordinarily low quality? The ELA standards remind me of a list of ideas about the teaching of English that some business major had a few years after graduating from college when he half remembered what he studied in the one or two English classes he took. In other words, the CC$$ in ELA are amateurish in the extreme. See my critique of two CC$$ “standards” here:
LikeLike
You will notice that my long list of objections have nothing whatsoever to do with politics. These are objections to the content of these standards and to the dire consequences of standardization.
LikeLike
cx: has, not have
LikeLike
There are a lot of policy wonks and educrats who do not recognizes the extent to which, on the Common Core, they have been PLAYED. The creation of the Common Core was a business move. It was paid for in order to further the business goals of a few key players. A single, invariant, top-down mandate of this kind is the LAST THING that our country needs. It will lead, is leading, to dramatic distortions of curricula and pedagogy and will mean the end of real curricular and pedagogical innovation.
But the adoption of national “standards” will make a few players a lot of money. Billions.
LikeLike
cx: recognize, not recognizes, of course. Oh for an edit feature on WordPress!
LikeLike
Bob, you one heck of a polymath! Hope to see you in Austin! We need to develop a movement culture at the grassroots. The text on this is Larry Goodwyn’s “Democratic Promise” about the Populist Movement (biracial, not the Hofstader straw man reactionary moment, but the movement Larry describes in Texas and I describe in Alabama) I hope that this will come out of Austin and John’s blogger network. The other task is to agree to and propose an alternative vision. I recently sent something called “A Plan For Sustainable Education” to Diane. We have to come up with a way to go “cold turkey” from corporate hand outs that require buy-in to straight jacket corporate reforms. I think a commenter above is correct in that parents are key to a successful movement with New York as the current exemplar.
LikeLike
Paul, unfortunately (and I am sick about this), I don’t think I’m going to be able to make it to Austen. We’ll see. I would love to see that document, Paul, and will gladly assist in any way that I can to put forward an alternative. Please see the general outline of alternative that I posted as part of that standards critique. Warm regards, and thank you for your eloquent voice on behalf of kids and their teachers!!!
LikeLike
cx: Yikes. Austin, not Austen, of course. Oh for a correction feature on WordPress. These typos are embarrassing! 🙂
LikeLike
That is why is frustrating to have to have conversations about its content, with the cloud of knowing its origin. I’ve simply stopped talking to people about it because I always felt like I was in the twilight zone. But I also realized that many teachers just lump it in as the next thing handed to them and they just see it as something that will also go away in a few years. To them it is just another textbook-edition type change. (Or I hear things like, “well once I got used to the scripted lessons. . .”)
I have a friend who is clearly wrestling with what to think of it all and so she asks me and I point her to things to read about it. Today she wanted me to know that a teacher friend of her likes it. And I told her that many teachers do. BUT many teachers also like medicating children, which I do not. So I guess at some point people just have to make up their own minds about the Common Core. Like any other divisive issue in our country.
LikeLike
I’m just honestly not impressed with the quality of the online test prep programs. My 5th grader uses one that the district bought, for math test prep and data collection, so I’m familiar with it.
Back in the DAY, when my eldest was in 5th grade, parents traded what was called “shareware” and it was very basic, no graphics or bell and whistles. It was math drills- no one pretended it was anything else. The whole attraction was the novelty, really. Other than that it had nothing to recommend it.
I’m not seeing a whole of “value-added” in the new version, to put in the bullet-point management terms that ed reformers are so fond of.
Maybe I’m not alone in that.
Maybe they’ll kill this golden goose by over-hyping it.
LikeLike
Let me lay this out again, step by step.
Bill Gates believes that the future of education lies with computer-adaptive curricula.
The idea is to have a single set of national standards and computer-adaptive curricula covering those standards.
Kids are to be served up particular online activities based on real-time computerized analysis of their responses (and comparison of these to responses from other students).
The responses all go into a single national database owned by Bill Gates.
The curriculum will come from various Gates partners. The Gates foundation issued RFPs for start-up companies to create such curricula, and it has entered into partnerships with companies like Pearson and Amplify to create such curricula.
Anyone who wants to play in the online education market of the future will have to go through this database, in order for their material to be adaptive to the student responses. That is, they will have to pay to play.
For this business plan to work, there had to be a single set of national standards to which to key the curriculum and those responses.
So, Bill paid for the creation of those national standards.
What we are seeing is the implementation of a business plan AND a theory of education AND a “disruptive innovation” in the educational materials marketplace.
And what makes it all work is that it’s CHEAPER because the main costs in education are facilities and teachers’ salaries, but teachers are to be largely replaced by software. Gates has spoken and written a lot about the necessity of doing that to get college costs down.
Teaching, there’s an app for that.
That’s the idea, and yet THE TEACHERS UNIONS ARE BACKING THE VERY INSTRUMENT THAT MAKES THIS MACHINE RUN–the national “standards.” That’s not very bright.
LikeLike
My brother,a computer programmer, shared his thoughts about a very similar plan 15 years ago. Education was becoming too costly. It would be more cost effective to give every student a laptop and deliver the instruction through adaptive software.
We see this now, with cyber school, and we all know how well that’s working. I never believed this idea would ever come to fruition. It is time to educate the parents and change course.
LikeLike
Robert:
1. Is this published anywhere step by step? (thank you for this, by the way).
2. Do you think the plan will succeed?
3. Can we assume that anyone who is already working in the education field through Gates money (like NC’s former governor) is set up to be a big player in this new landscape?
4. What is the best method of resisting this plan? Or can the little guys even stand a chance?
LikeLike
Now, I happen to be a proponent of educational software. I think that it has enormous potential (but that there are also many pitfalls). However, one doesn’t need the Orwellian national standards and national database to unleash innovation in educational software. In fact, having national standards and a national database will unleash enormous forces for the MONOPOLIZATION of educational materials markets.
This is obvious, or ought to be.
LikeLike
yeah they’ve pretty much hijacked the best “21st Century” tool we could have used to help with equity. Or at least cloudied up the skies that would point to those stars lining up.
One district could enable more AP classes with technology and so forth. . .but now our hands our tied with CCSS.
LikeLike
Great comments. One of the difficulties I’ve encountered in arguing against CCSS is exactly the fact that the standards, which are the the public face of the reforms, are the tip of a great iceberg. Actually, I consider a better metaphor to be the Trojan Horse. The reformers buried the testing and data collection commitments in the NCLB waivers and RttT agreements, so that once the standards are sold the rest will be hard to stop.
But Horton’s comments are not the whole story. I just finished reading Jacques Ellul’s great book, The Technological Society, and I highly recommend it to anyone struggling to understand the big picture that Horton and Head allude to.
Although the US edition is about 50 years old (and the original French edition about 60), Ellul had a very clear bead on the trends that we see culminating today. Briefly, Ellul argues that since the Enlightenment, and especially with the Industrial Revolution, we have been in the throws of a unique and great sociological shift to a Taylorized, mechanized, and computerized society that is focused solely on what Ellul calls “technique” which aims to optimize “efficiency” in all areas of human activity. The result is the increasing mechanization of humanity, with ever greater efforts to overcome the illnesses introduced by forcing humans to live under inherently un-human conditions.
From Ellul’s point of view, what we see with CCSS and just about every other shift in politics, economics, and social relationships, is just another aspect of the great sociological shift that began around 1850. The Obamas, Gateses, Murdochs, etc., all are just acting out roles as part of that shift, which has created an economy that rewards those who further advance “technique” into education as it does in any other part of our society.
Ellul makes no value judgments about all of this; his point is to demonstrate the trend. Nor does he offer much by way of suggestions to get out. Again, his point is to show what’s happening. I think Horton and Head (and many other commentators on the affect of computers and the Internet on our intellects) have a strong argument that eventually humanity will become too intellectually lazy to maintain its machines. Then, I guess we’ll enter a new sociological era.
I think taking Ellul’s point of view, we have to start asking what it is that we want in our lives. Do we want a culture and society bent on “efficient” actions? Or do we want to define what is “human” and make that our focus? If the latter, are we ready for the trade-offs? Regardless, it’s time to start asking the hard phliosophical questions about what we want, what we need, and what we can have. We have to stop looking at “education” as some sort of deliverable, but a central element to building and maintaining a culture.
LikeLike
You will be interested to know, moosensquirrels, that the market research giant Nielsen paid $950 million (just about a billion dollars) to purchase NeuroFocus, a company that does brainwave research using retinal scanners, galvanic skin response wristbands, electroencephalographs, etc. And the US DOE just put out a report on using such devices to track student Grit, Tenacity, and Perseverance.
O brave new world!
LikeLike
Thank you! I would also recommend Neil Postman’s “Technopoly.”
LikeLike
If you want to reverse the trends in income inequality in the US, you should not marry your college sweetheart, but instead find a spouse with very different educational background and ambitions. Assertive marriage explains much of the increase in income inequality in the United States. An interesting article in Slate: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2014/02/assortative_mating_people_marrying_similar_people_is_raising_income_inequality.html
LikeLike
Of course, dramatically rising inequality in wealth and income in the United States has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the cosy old-boy network among politicians, CEOs, and folks sitting on the compensation committees of corporate boards or with the outsourcing of jobs or with automation or with union busting “right-to-work” laws. It’s all about who is marrying whom.
LikeLike
It is not ALL about any one thing. Assortative marriage, for example, would have little impact if women still found themselves herded into a few relatively low paying occupations and had the low labor force participation rates of the early 60s. As usual, some is neither all or none.
LikeLike
good point, TE
LikeLike
Low-paying occupations like librarian, teacher, and childcare worker, BTW.
In the brave new world of K-college education being envisioned, precious few workers will be herded into those occupations. The Executive Vice Provost of Arizona State recently told a reporter that in three years 80 percent of classes at his school would be taught via computer.
We can have 500 or 1,000 students per class and some low-wage people around to make sure that the computers are up and operating. But hey, that’s just the way it is. One either accepts such “progress” or is King Lud.
But we need those uniform standards first. The software and the databases need to have a common currency.
It’s amazing how few (including leaders of the teachers’ unions) seem to understand how these parts of the puzzle are related.
LikeLike
From the article TE referenced:
“Not only is the prosperous man of the early 21st century much more likely to be married to a women who also earns a substantial income than was his predecessor of 50 years ago, but he also pays a lower income tax rate.”
LikeLike
In Wisconsin it is the Tea Party and our Republican regime in Madison that are out to deep-six the Common Core. Mary Burke, the likely Democratic candidate for governor, supports the Common Core. The plan to replace the Common Core that is presently being considered by the Republicans, who will have their way, is a truly terrible ALEC concoction. We seem to be on a track from bad to worse.
LikeLike
I like what Paul Horton writes and I think he is very brave.
The University of Chicago Lab School is an interesting place. As we all know, Obama sent his children there and many of the financial and political elite of the City – people who also vigorously supported him in his rise to the White House – send their children there too. They likely don’t understand what Horton is banging on about because Barack Obama is genuinely a caring and intelligent guy. How could his policies, and those of Arne Duncan who is also a known quantity, be such a harbinger of doom? Then there are the university professor parents who understand Horton’s point and probably have a few thoughts on how the argument could be improved or elaborated. That is, if they would only enter into the conversation. Instead, these academics (and administrators) closed their school of education and work on the topic of education in various “committees” and institutes rather than in a proper school of education like Harvard, Stanford and Columbia. While the students at Lab still benefit from Dewey’s vision, there is a lack of will to extend this vision and, yes social critique to other quarters of American society.
At the end of the day, Dewey’s vision has become an educational product or brand that can be consumed by elites and not the source of cultural and human transformation he had hoped for. You could throw a pebble randomly into the audience at a school assembly hit a person who could elucidate this point better than me. So I find the whole affair sickening and Paul Horton to be very brave…speaking truth to power.
LikeLike
Thank you, I encourage people to read my colleague’s (Bernard Harcourt, Foucaudian analyst, lawyer, and political scientist) take down of neo-liberal economics: The Illusion of Free Markets.” His neo-liberal colleagues in the Economics Department and Law School here were not very happy with him. He is a profound thinker and, most importantly, a defender of death row inmates. Many of the faculty at the Lab Schools and many of the University faculty share critical perspectives, go to the same parties, hang out at Jimmy’s, and have been friends for a long time. Everyone in this community knows many of the the folks in top administrative positions (Obama administration). Many of us are among the most disappointed with many of his policies because we were among the first to support his candidacy and we have become very disenchanted. He and the people around them are very smart and very decent people, but they have made a devil’s margin on education issues. The party needs money and they are addicted to Wall Street money that DFER uses to fund campaigns in exchange of support of charters. I wrote an article about this a few weeks ago in Ed Week. They had to have Gates on their side and they are paying a heavy price as parents, teachers, and students are mobilized against RTTT. They are very slow to realize that their education policies are keeping the Tea Party alive. They have made awful mistakes in choosing RTTT as the path to take. A member of our community very close to the President told me that ” Arne chose the fastest way to get where we need to go. Not everyone could be in the room when we made these decisions.” I have it on good authority that the “people in the room” were charters school investors.
LikeLike
Hi Paul,
Re: “Many of us are among the most disappointed with many of his policies because we were among the first to support his candidacy”
Very curious as to why?
What really sold you on this guy?
re: “He and the people around them are very smart and very decent people,”
They always are. Everyone we are aquatinted with, in our own social class is quite decent, of course.
Very few mustache twirling villains straight out of central casting. They are all nice people who give to charity, help old ladies across the street, and really, really care about _______ (something nice).
But they are killing us and our students.
Respectfully,
Ang
LikeLike
I meant “devil’s bargain.”
LikeLike
Paul,
Thanks for your insights. Could you possibly link to your Ed Week article that you mentioned? I’d be really interested in reading it.
So many people I work with still can’t wrap their minds around how anyone “makes money” from charters. When I try to explain, it seems like they don’t want to listen.
Maybe they don’t want to look like “conspiracy theorists”.
LikeLike
Paul, I will save you the trouble — it was this, correct?
http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/04/paul_horton_of_common_core_con.html?qs=paul+obama
LikeLike
LOL I posted the link to your article before actually reading much of it, and I just noticed that it opens with a comment about “conspiracy theorists” (in quotes, no less) — just like I ENDED my comment to you above.
Coincidence? Or CONSPIRACY?!?
LikeLike
Ron, just google “Paul Horton and Education Week.” I am in and out of class, so I join when I can. Sorry for the delay.
LikeLike
I just figured that was a new economic term “devil’s margin”-some kind of economic “bet/hedge”.
LikeLike
Paul, I think I linked the wrong article. I’ll look again but if you would be so kind as to link to the correct one, I’m sure I wouldn’t be the only one who would appreciate it.
LikeLike
Diane has it linked twice in her post.
LikeLike
Sigh.
Thank you. I think I need a good night’s sleep. I’m way too scattered today.
Sorry for the mess.
LikeLike
Paul, fantastic article and I will try to share it with others.
I noticed a small problem with the last couple of sentences. I think they should be corrected:
“We would all do well to read our Smith and Marx to understand why we [should] rid ourselves of a Common Core and RTTT [that] make no effort to consider either moral sentiments or alienated labor.”
I think that’s how it was supposed to read anyway. Again, thanks. I’m especially your article will be of interest to my fiancee, who is a pediatric oncologist. I’ve heard enough from her to know that what you said about your doctor was spot on.
LikeLike
Werebat73, I work too fast and I missed two words and you found them. Between chaperoning and coaching student events, grading papers, planning, four independent studies with students, and, oh yes, teaching, I have little time to write and don’t catch as many typos as I should. I type very slowly and am not a good typist, so I am embarrassed when I see the typos in print. I am a very good editor of my student’s work, but not my own, I just don’t take enough time.
LikeLike
Not a problem Paul (I am Werebat73). Don’t feel bad, your article was great and to my own embarrassment I made a couple of typos in pointing out yours! I mentioned the ones I saw only because I felt it was a valuable thing to read and should be as clear as possible.
I blame my typos and scattered thoughts on my general failure to get more than 4 hours of sleep a night. Works for me!
Thanks again for the article!
LikeLike
While it’s unquestionable that CCSS – and the so-called education reform that it’s a vehicle for – is about profit, let’s also not lose sight of the fact that It’s also about power and control (not that these are mutually exclusive).
It’s about the power to reconfigure teacher labor relations and restructure the profession itself.
It’s about the power to control what and how children learn.
It’s about the power to redefine education as training children for a future of work (for those fortunate enough to get it) filled with insecurity, tedium, surveillance and powerlessness.
It’s about the power of the Overclass to take democratic rights from Us, and give all authority to Them.
LikeLike
Yes
LikeLike
yes
LikeLike
“This might be ok if they planned on sharing some of those gains with a hard-working workforce as Adam Smith believed should happen. ”
No, turning students into products will never be okay even if the profit is shared with the worker bees. Otherwise, I find Horton’s analysis compelling. I would guess that either I am missing a context for the comment above or the statement is part of an unfortunate attempt to conclude his essay.
LikeLike
The reference is to the chapter from Smith’s Wealth of Nations that I discussed with my students yesterday: “On the Wages of Labour.” The point is that workers are not being compensated for productivity gains. Smith wanted “liberal compensation.” Check out the last link on Marx from FP, just click on Marx.
LikeLike
Thanks for responding, Paul. I think I misinterpreted what you were saying and drew connections to education that you were not making.
LikeLike
I could just cry over all this.
LikeLike
Time for a song. I will imagine the rambler is a victory for patents and children (but for me it will be a male image because that’s how I roll):
Jolie Holland’s “Poor Girl Blues”
LikeLike
I think Horton’s recommendation to eliminate CCSS is the rambling man.
Oh maybe I’m a poor girl
but it doesn’t bother me at all
Maybe I’m a poor girl
But it doesn’t bother me at all
When this world comes crashing down
I know that I’ll be standing tall
I used to be an angel
Now I’m just like everybody else
I used to be an angel
Now I’m just like everybody else
I left my wings in the gutter
And my halo is lost
Dusty on a shelf
I know a rambling boy
He’s driving me crazy and wild
I know a rambling boy
he’s driving me crazy and wild
wild wild wild
I’d have “public school for my children”
and the world as “our” throne
if only he were by my side again
I got a couple of foodstamps
and a caffiene buzz
I got a couple of foodstamps
and a caffiene buzz
So I’d be set for right now, darling
if I only knew
just where he was
I’d tell him to hold tight honey
don’t lose your spirit to the wind
I’d tell him hold tight honey
don’t lose your spirit to the wind
I know you and I know you’ll be a long time rambling
before you see your rest again
Oh maybe I’m a poor girl
But I don’t worry about it none
Maybe I’m a poor girl
But I don’t worry about it none
When this world comes crashing down
I know that I’ll be standing in the sun
I’ll be standing in the sun
LikeLike
One of the best ways to know what has happened to this country over the past 35 years (especially for those too young to remember or weren’t around then) is to get hold of the three Barlett and Steele paperback books (in addition to their most recent work) that were published in the 1990s and explain just exactly how our country got so screwed up. The blame lies squarely with Congress and the White House and their collusion with special interests.
Those books infuriated people then, and they are even more infuriating now because this whole economic mess NEVER should have happened.
LikeLike
More about Milton Friedman can be found here:
http://www.alternet.org/visions/true-history-libertarianism-america-phony-ideology-promote-corporate-agenda?page=0%2C0
LikeLike
Or here:http://hoohila.stanford.edu/friedman/MF_bio.php
LikeLike
My father always told me to be far more wary of the right than the left (when I would become frustrated with folks who did not understand decorum or who were not top notch students when I was in school).
Now I understand what he meant.
That said, the left has reached out and grabbed on to these ideas too. My other favorite song lately is Lauryn Hill’s “Forgive them Father” (even if she doesn’t like white women—-I like her music).
LikeLike
LikeLike
Or here: http://economics.uwo.ca/epri/workingpapers_docs/wp2012/Laidler_02.pdf
LikeLike
Read up on Friedman:
“In one of his most influential essays, Friedman articulated contemporary capitalism’s core tactical nostrum, what I have come to understand as “the shock doctrine”. He observed that “only a crisis – actual or perceived – produces real change”. When that crisis occurs, the actions taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. Some people stockpile canned goods and water in preparation for major disasters; Friedmanites stockpile free-market ideas. And once a crisis has struck, the University of Chicago professor was convinced that it was crucial to act swiftly, to impose rapid and irreversible change before the crisis-racked society slipped back into the “tyranny of the status quo”. A variation on Machiavelli’s advice that “injuries” should be inflicted “all at once”, this is one of Friedman’s most lasting legacies.”
Naomi Klein
Or this, immediately following Katrina (Hey, people dead, lives in shambles, homes, livelihoods destroyed…let’s pimp vouchers!)
http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/resources/part7/chapter20/friedman-promise-vouchers
LikeLike
The Common Core is “common,” certainly, as in “lowest-common denominator”
common. n. Base, vulgar, mediocre
LikeLike
Reblogged this on LiterateOwl.
LikeLike