Mark Giaquinta here explains the hoax of vouchers in Indiana. He served as president of the Fort Wayne school board. It was my privilege to visit some of that city’s excellent public schools when I lectured there a couple of years ago.
Vouchers were sold under the pretext of “helping poor kids escape from failing public schools.” So said the sponsors of the legislation.
In fact, the vouchers are now available for students who never attended public schools. They are a direct subsidy of religious schools.
One church, as Phyllis Bush pointed out in a guest post for Anthony Cody, is using the voucher windfall to repair its steeple.
Is this what the people of Indiana want? Or is it ALEC at work again, undermining a democratic institution?
Mark writes:
Greetings:
The voucher program in Indiana was defended as a method that would allow poor Hoosier children to escape from failing schools. Of course, many of us knew that was nothing more than a slogan. There never was a voucher requirement that to become eligible, the student leave a poor performing school or apply to a higher performing school (putting aside the problem of defining either). In addition, the income requirements extended well into middle class. Finally, the program was expanded to those who never attended public schools, thus eliminating once and for all the “help those poor kids escape” illusion.
The vast majority of voucher money is now spent by those desirous of a religious education; a facet of the educational experience with which public schools cannot compete. The recent release of the Voucher Study details the number of students receiving taxpayer assistance and the names of the various Catholic, Lutheran, Islamic and non-denominational schools they attend. There are approximately 2800 voucher students within the FWCS boundaries. (FN1) FWCS estimates it lost about 500 students to vouchers; therefore more than 80% of the recipients were already parochial school students.
More alarming, the common school fund has not grown to accommodate the policy decision to fund both public and private schools. The result is fewer dollars for all public schools as the common school fund is diverted to ….. church steeples! Yes, you read that correctly. In a recent address to parish members, Rev. Jake Runyon , Pastor of St. Jude Parish, spoke at length on the importance of parishioners applying for the tax funded choice scholarships. His remarks were recorded and are available on the parish web site. Pastor Runyon made it clear that increasing the number of voucher students will, “ease the financial burden on the parish.” He then went on to explain to parishioners that expanding the tax supported scholarships will make it less difficult, “for me to do some certain thing on the Church side of things like fix the steeple, paint the roof and maybe grow the ministries we can do, you know, on the Church side of things.” (at 13:00 to 14:00).
I love my Catholic faith and I am proud of my Catholic education, paid for by my dad. I even introduced a Resolution to the FWCS Board a few years back congratulating our Catholic colleagues for Catholic Schools week. My grandfather, Thomas Kelly, stood in for Bishop Noll and broke the ground for Central Catholic High School (with Superintendant Abbot turning dirt beside him). I am, nonetheless, dismayed and disappointed at this acknowledgement that the common school fund has become part of a shell game to support religious activities. It is my hope that community leaders will speak out forcefully to legislators and bring this sorry chapter of constitutional contempt to an end. I fully understand the consequences of speaking out on this issue but I have no desire to serve on the school board and witness its demise as the result of policies which I believe would shock the consciences of the delegates to our Constitutional Conventions of 1816 and 1850.
Thanks for your consideration.
Mark E. GiaQuinta
FN 1: I have not distinguished between a voucher and a “Choice Scholarship” because both direct public dollars from the common school fund to religious education and because the tax funded scholarship program creates voucher eligibility in subsequent years. It is disappointing that so very few taxpayers and “tax watchdogs” understand how the Scholarships work. A taxpayer creates a scholarship of at least $1,000 for her student at a particular school and receives a tax credit (50%) which is taken from the common school fund. The private school can pay the balance of the tuition because the scholarship is a gateway to a voucher in subsequent years.
Mark E. GiaQuinta, Esq.
HALLER & COLVIN, P.C.
444 East Main Street
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802
Telephone: (260) 426-0444
Facsimile: (260) 422-0274
E-mail: mgiaquinta@hallercolvin.com
Legal Assistant: Carrie Thomas, (260) 399-1528, cthomas@hallercolvin.com
I think it might be more productive to ask ed reformers not what role do they see for publicly-funded, privately run schools, but instead what role do they see for public schools?
Why do we have public schools in this country? What is their value? Are they simply a back up for “choice” schools? I live in a state run by ed reformers, Ohio, and like Indiana, the entire focus of our governor is on “choice”, charters and vouchers.
What value does he place on public schools? Do they have any value at all, over and above their role as fulfilling the legal mandate to provide a slot for every child?
Chiara, your governor in Ohio sees a role for public schools. He sees them as dumping grounds for the kids the charters don’t want. He will destroy public education as a community institution if he has enough time to do it.
He’s running for re-election so he’s “rediscovered” public schools 🙂
I do think it’s a good way to frame the question to politicians, however. The entire debate in Ohio has been conducted on the ground chosen by ed reformers, which is “what is the value of choice”?
I want to ask them the question the other way. What is the value of public schools?
If I were a governor or president I would consider existing public schools to be an asset I inherited, was given, because of course generations prior built the system.
I think I need to know whether they consider public schools to be simply a menu item during the “choice” battles and then the “safety” system to rely on as a back up, because I don’t look at public schools that way. I think they’re much more fundamental and important than that to communities, states and the country.
It was learned during testimony at the hearing to stop the voucher program in Douglas County Colorado, by a representative of one of the religious schools that would have received public dollars, that the funds would have been used to pay the mortgage on a closed, empty, campus owned by the church. Had the program moved forward, accountability for the spending of public dollars earmarked for public education simply did not exist.
This is a good piece on Ohio’s voucher program. Ed reformers knew the private religious schools didn’t outperform the public schools when they expanded the program, because Ohio was one of the first states to try vouchers:
Extensive research on Cleveland’s voucher program, one of the first in the country, showed little variation in academic achievement between voucher and public schools students and also indicated the majority of voucher students were attending private schools prior to receiving the voucher. According to 2009-10 state achievement test results, 3rd through 8th grade public school students in Cleveland consistently outperformed voucher students in math and showed mixed results in reading. Similar results were seen in Akron, Canton, Columbus, and Dayton, but Cincinnati and Toledo elementary school students outperformed their voucher peers almost across the board. –
They expanded it anyway.
It has nothing to do with “great schools” or “failing schools”. It was always about politics and ideology.
http://www.policymattersohio.org/privatization-jan2013
All that the pastor was saying is that if he didn’t have to spend so much church money subsidizing the school, he would be able to spend the church money on church matters. That doesn’t mean he’s going to take voucher money and spend it on steeples. It is wrong to accuse him of saying that.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul.
The school could raise tuition.
But I.
Reblogged this on Saint Simon Common Core Information and commented:
Ever wondered about the voucher system in Indiana (this post gives some stats from the Fort Wayne area) ? Here are some details.
Wow. Just… wow. So Indiana parishes failing to find funding parishioners can now count on the public– property-tax-paying citizens– to fix their crumbling churches. With monies that were supposed to fund local public schools. So much for separation of church and state.
Hello, I am a voucher parent that seriously questions the choice system. I write my concerns in this post, which is a response to the post above. Due to my serious concerns regarding this system of “choice” – we have decided that when we move (due to a new job) that our children will attend public schools. There is too much “entangling” of funding with the mission of the church. When you can no longer determine who is managing the school, which was suppose to be managed “locally” – then there is an issue. Using state funds to subsidize the church’s ministry of education does make me wonder what implications this may have on the overall curriculum and evaluations of Catholic schools. And do families have a voice in these decisions? Or is it only the Bishops and the State leaders that have the final say based on the “money trail” — Also, aren’t tuition paying families “stakeholders” in all of this? Shouldn’t they have a voice in making these decisions? Or isn’t there enough funding there by the individuals to make their voices heard? Just wondering.
http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/02/indiana_choice_parent_question.html
Hi Diane.
Would you please give me a call at your convenience.
Thanks in advance
Mark
Hi Mark,
Nice to hear from you. Please email. I don’t post my phone number in public. Neither should you.