Peter DeWitt’s latest blog post strongly criticizes the leadership of New York state for ignoring the cries of parents and educators to stop the punitive policies.
He begins:
Where education is concerned in New York State, the past few years have been both painful and chaotic. It sounds crazy doesn’t it? How can ‘reform’ cause so much controversy, disruption and anger? Onlookers on the outside just assumed public schools were whining because they were unwilling to change, but as they scratched the surface they realized how wrong those changes were, and that they were painful–especially to students.
It began a couple of years ago when Governor Cuomo called himself the “Lobbyist for Children.” As he stood on his bully pulpit, touting statistics, he slashed budgets, increased accountability, and piled on mandates. Besides those changes he did something much worse, he tried to destroy the confidence that the public had in public education.
Educators saw the Common Core State Standards coming, and something interesting happened, many were looking forward to the national standards. Teachers, who have long taught transient students, or just those that came from a lower grade level seemingly unprepared, valued the idea that everyone would be required to teach the same standards. Maybe then, they thought, that there would not be so many gaps in the learning of their incoming students.
Unfortunately, that is when things started to unravel.
Today, the public has no confidence in Commissioner John King and no confidence in the New York Board of Regents. The Regents are appointed by the State Assembly and they are accountable to no one. The Commissioner is appointed by the Regents, and he is accountable only to them. Between King and the Regents, the voice of parents and educators carries no weight.
Only two members of the Board of Regents consistently oppose the board’s tone-deaf policies: Kathleen Cashin, a veteran educator who represents Brooklyn; and Betty A. Rosa, a veteran educator who represents the Bronx. Cashin and Rosa keep asking tough questions, keep dissenting, keep demanding responsiveness, but they are rebuffed and ignored.
Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo and Commissioner King have one thing in common: They are determined to damage public education, to make the public believe that their public schools are failures, and to enact policies that harm the schools.
DeWitt believes that Cuomo–who is running for re-election–should change course.* King should resign. Furthermore, the Assembly should replace the four docile, passive Regents whose terms are expiring and appoint Regents who actually care about the future of our public schools.
A great column from a conscientious educator!
*To readers: DeWitt did not call for Cuomo to resign. He wants Cuomo to pressure King to resign. he called for new Regents who would chart a new course.

DUMP Cuomo
LikeLike
DUMP King!
LikeLike
Dump most of the Democratic and Republican parties throughout the United States . . . . .
LikeLike
+1
LikeLike
The problem is obvious: if we don’t vote vote for Cuomo, then who DO we vote for. Neither party is representative of their constituencies.
LikeLike
I voted for Governor Cuomo when he was elected governor of New York. After seeing how he is really the “lobbyist for Common Core” and his blatant disregard for democracy, and how he has sold out the children of our great state, I will cast my ballot against him in the upcoming 2014 election.
LikeLike
Dump everyone who is colluding with Cuomo, Tisch and King.
LikeLike
There are approximately 300,000 teachers and administrators in NYS. That’s 300,000 votes that Cuomo can only dream about getting.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, the misleaders of our union – especially given the Weingarten/Mulgrew attempt to stage a coup in the statewide union – are intent on backing him no matter how detrimental he has been for interests of teachers and students.
LikeLike
A vote for Andrew Cuomo is nothing short of treason.
LikeLike
Mulgrew just might be the only “educator” who votes for him.
LikeLike
“Educators saw the Common Core State Standards coming, and something interesting happened, many were looking forward to the national standards.”
Please provide proof of that statement. As it is it is just an opinion, nothing more, nothing less and has no validity in the discussion of the CCSS (Crappy Corporate Stalinistic Standards).
LikeLike
That statement is just another of the many edudeformer lies.
LikeLike
Hi Duane,
It’s unfortunate that you have to leave a negative comment which missed the point of the blog. Yes, I did write the opinion that many educators looked forward to the Common Core, but then the support of the CCSS fell apart, especially in New York. Friends of mine and of Diane’s wrote books and blogs welcoming new standards, and then saw the impact they were having on schools due to increased accountability and mandates, and realized that the Common Core was being used in many destructive ways.
As for your comment regarding me as an edudeformer, as you call it but I will leave that up to my staff to decide.
LikeLike
Hi Peter:
Great article. Thank you so much for writing it. Sincerely. The more and louder the voices against the madness the better.
Duane might have been extreme, but you really hit a nerve, there. A LOT of educators that I know (and read from in different blogs) were wondering, “…what in the world…?” when the CCSS first came out with the full support of Randi and (by her count) the AFT. And the more we learned about them, the more our concerns and misgivings became justified.
Then she had Gates as the speaker at the AFT convention. Still don’t get that one.
You refer to the “transient students”. I know that’s one of the selling points for national standards. I’d be curious about the statistics on this, including demographics. Both inter and intra-state. My interest is due to the fact that I know there are business leaders who want this. It makes things much more convenient and quantifiable.
Back at the beginning of the new millennium, NYC was force fed a completely new math curriculum that stressed process over product. Both general and special ed were told to do this, regardless of student needs. The official reason: executives from leading Fortune 500 companies told us, “We need problem solvers. We can buy calculators at any stationery store”.
How many kids do you think will be working behind the desk of a Fortune 500 company? Yet we went with what they wanted, lock, stock, and barrel. Because the business community said so.
It was a disaster for my special needs students and many, many kids in general ed, as well.
Since then, the takeover has been relentless. To the point where, now, we are being treated like 1000 data points of light. Meaningless slogans and uneducated assertions with no weight behind them as to what we need in order to become “competitive” in the new world order.
The article is a very good one and I hope it catches attention. But again: you really hit a nerve, there. I, for one, am completely against these particular standards (bankrolled by Gates and created by non-educators) and am not in favor of national standards, to begin with. NY State’s standards were fine, before. And there were no strings attached (see VAM, the cost of technology for implementation, etc).
LikeLike
Apologies. My main point should’ve been clearer:
Many of us were suspicious of the motives behind the CCSS from the beginning. The fact that so few educators were involved in the decision making processes was a huge red flag. It seemed very “big business” oriented. Time has now told us that this is very much the case.
Add the inflexibilities inherent to the CCSS (remember: on a national scale) and we’ve been seeing a lot of resistance from the start.
LikeLike
“DeWitt believes that Cuomo–who is running for re-election–should resign.” Is this true?
LikeLike